pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.09873 · v1 · pith:RLHPHNNDnew · submitted 2019-07-23 · 💻 cs.RO · cs.HC

An extended framework for characterizing social robots

Kim Baraka , Patr\'icia Alves-Oliveira , Tiago Ribeiro This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 17:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO cs.HC
keywords social robotscharacterization frameworkhuman-robot interactionrobot designtaxonomyappearanceautonomyrelational role
0
0 comments X

The pith

Social robots are characterized along seven dimensions relevant to their design and human interactions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents an overview of characteristics that arise in social robots and their interactions with humans. It contributes a framework built from literature review that organizes this variety into seven dimensions: appearance, social capabilities, purpose and application area, relational role, autonomy and intelligence, proximity, and temporal profile. Within each dimension the authors supply classifications and explanations that aim to unify and extend prior taxonomies. The framework is intended as a practical resource for researchers and designers to position existing robots and guide new ones. A sympathetic reader would care because clearer shared language could reduce ambiguity when comparing, evaluating, or building social robots across projects.

Core claim

The central claim is that the variety of social robots is best captured for design purposes by a framework of seven dimensions—appearance, social capabilities, purpose and application area, relational role, autonomy and intelligence, proximity, and temporal profile—each containing classifications and explanations drawn from the literature, extending and unifying earlier taxonomies.

What carries the argument

The seven-dimension framework that classifies social robots by appearance, social capabilities, purpose and application area, relational role, autonomy and intelligence, proximity, and temporal profile.

If this is right

  • Designers can position new robots relative to existing ones using the shared dimensions.
  • Researchers gain a common vocabulary for discussing robot capabilities and contexts.
  • Future work can extend individual dimensions with more granular sub-classifications.
  • The framework supports comparison of robots across different application areas.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same dimensions could be used to evaluate how well a robot matches a stated human need before deployment.
  • Temporal profile and proximity dimensions might help predict long-term acceptance or rejection in real homes or schools.
  • If the framework is adopted, curricula for human-robot interaction could organize case studies along these axes.

Load-bearing premise

The seven dimensions chosen from the literature review are the most relevant and sufficient to describe social robots without major omissions or overlaps.

What would settle it

A documented social robot whose design or interaction features cannot be placed on any of the seven dimensions without introducing a clearly new category.

read the original abstract

Social robots are becoming increasingly diverse in their design, behavior, and usage. In this chapter, we provide a broad-ranging overview of the main characteristics that arise when one considers social robots and their interactions with humans. We specifically contribute a framework for characterizing social robots along 7 dimensions that we found to be most relevant to their design. These dimensions are: appearance, social capabilities, purpose and application area, relational role, autonomy and intelligence, proximity, and temporal profile. Within each dimension, we account for the variety of social robots through a combination of classifications and/or explanations. Our framework builds on and goes beyond existing frameworks, such as classifications and taxonomies found in the literature. More specifically, it contributes to the unification, clarification, and extension of key concepts, drawing from a rich body of relevant literature. This chapter is meant to serve as a resource for researchers, designers, and developers within and outside the field of social robotics. It is intended to provide them with tools to better understand and position existing social robots, as well as to inform their future design.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an extended framework for characterizing social robots along seven dimensions identified from the literature as most relevant to their design: appearance, social capabilities, purpose and application area, relational role, autonomy and intelligence, proximity, and temporal profile. Within each dimension the authors provide classifications and explanations, positioning the framework as a unification, clarification, and extension of existing taxonomies to serve as a resource for researchers and designers.

Significance. If adopted, the framework could supply a shared vocabulary for positioning existing social robots and guiding future designs. Its contribution rests on the synthesis of concepts across the cited literature rather than new empirical data or formal derivations; the value therefore hinges on community uptake and demonstrated utility in subsequent work.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the seven dimensions are 'most relevant' rests on the authors' assessment of the literature without an explicit, reproducible selection procedure or criteria for inclusion/exclusion. This directly affects the defensibility of the framework's claimed comprehensiveness.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful review and constructive feedback. We address the single major comment below and outline revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the seven dimensions are 'most relevant' rests on the authors' assessment of the literature without an explicit, reproducible selection procedure or criteria for inclusion/exclusion. This directly affects the defensibility of the framework's claimed comprehensiveness.

    Authors: We acknowledge the validity of this observation. The seven dimensions were identified through our synthesis of the cited literature, where these aspects recur as central to social robot design and interaction (e.g., appearance and autonomy appear across multiple taxonomies referenced in Sections 2 and 3). However, the manuscript does not articulate an explicit, step-by-step selection procedure. To address this, we will revise the abstract to soften the phrasing to 'seven dimensions identified from the literature as particularly relevant' and add a brief subsection in the introduction (new Section 1.1) that describes the process: a review of key survey papers and taxonomies (Bartneck & Forlizzi 2004, Fong et al. 2003, and others cited), followed by thematic grouping of recurring characteristics. This will improve transparency without altering the framework itself. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper proposes a descriptive 7-dimensional taxonomy for social robots derived from a literature review and synthesis of existing classifications. No mathematical derivations, equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or uniqueness theorems are present. The central claim is an interpretive framework that explicitly builds on cited external literature without reducing any step to self-definition, self-citation chains, or renaming of results by construction. This is a standard non-circular synthesis paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on the domain assumption that the listed dimensions adequately organize the space of social robots; no free parameters or new entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The seven dimensions are the most relevant to the design of social robots.
    Stated directly in the abstract as the basis for the contributed framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5714 in / 1195 out tokens · 51716 ms · 2026-05-24T17:32:37.337850+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

210 extracted references · 210 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bainbridge, W

    Abras, C., Maloney-Krichmar, D., Preece, J.: User-centered design. Bainbridge, W. Encyclo- pedia of Human-Computer Interaction. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications 37(4), 445–456 (2004)

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction, pp

    Adalgeirsson, S.O., Breazeal, C.: Mebot: a robotic platform for socially embodied presence. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction, pp. 15–22. IEEE Press (2010)

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    AI Magazine 37(1), 78–84 (2016)

    Adams, S.S., Banavar, G., Campbell, M.: I-athlon: Towards a multidimensional turing test. AI Magazine 37(1), 78–84 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 6(1), 25–63 (2017)

    Admoni, H., Scassellati, B.: Social eye gaze in human-robot interaction: a review. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 6(1), 25–63 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 1(3), 14 (2017)

    Ahmad, M., Mubin, O., Orlando, J.: A systematic review of adaptivity in human-robot inter- action. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 1(3), 14 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction, pp

    Alonso-Mora, J., Siegwart, R., Beardsley, P.: Human-robot swarm interaction for enter- tainment: From animation display to gesture based control. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction, pp. 98–98. ACM (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    In: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp

    Alves-Oliveira, P., Arriaga, P., Paiva, A., Hoffman, G.: Yolo, a robot for creativity: A co- design study with children. In: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 423–429. ACM (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    In: Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp

    Alves-Oliveira, P., Chandak, A., Cloutier, I., Kompella, P., Moegenburg, P., Bastos Pires, A.E.: Yolo-a robot that will make your creativity boom. In: Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 335–336. ACM (2018)

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    In: 2016 AAAI Fall Symposium Series (2016)

    Alves-Oliveira, P., Küster, D., Kappas, A., Paiva, A.: Psychological science in HRI: Striving for a more integrated field of research. In: 2016 AAAI Fall Symposium Series (2016)

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI)8(1), 3 (2019)

    Alves-Oliveira, P., Sequeira, P., Melo, F.S., Castellano, G., Paiva, A.: Empathic robot for group learning: A field study. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI)8(1), 3 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    In: 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp

    Anderson-Bashan, L., Megidish, B., Erel, H., Wald, I., Hoffman, G., Zuckerman, O., Gr- ishko, A.: The greeting machine: An abstract robotic object for opening encounters. In: 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 595–602. IEEE (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    IEEE Control Systems 34(4), 46–64 (2014)

    Augugliaro, F., Lupashin, S., Hamer, M., Male, C., Hehn, M., Mueller, M.W., Willmann, J.S., Gramazio, F., Kohler, M., D’Andrea, R.: The flight assembled architecture installation: Cooperative construction with flying machines. IEEE Control Systems 34(4), 46–64 (2014)

    work page 2014

  13. [13]

    In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Con- ference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp

    Avelino, J., Moreno, P., Bernardino, A., Correia, F., Paiva, A., Catarino, J., Ribeiro, P.: The power of a hand-shake in human-robot interactions. In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Con- ference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 1864–1869. IEEE (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    In: Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2008

    Bainbridge, W.A., Hart, J., Kim, E.S., Scassellati, B.: The effect of presence on human-robot interaction. In: Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2008. RO-MAN 2008. The 17th IEEE International Symposium on, pp. 701–706. IEEE (2008)

    work page 2008

  15. [15]

    AK Peters/CRC Press (2002) An extended framework for characterizing social robots 35

    Balch, T., Parker, L.E.: Robot teams: from diversity to polymorphism. AK Peters/CRC Press (2002) An extended framework for characterizing social robots 35

    work page 2002

  16. [16]

    In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, pp

    Baraka, K., Couto, M., Melo, F.S., Veloso, M.: An optimization approach for structured agent-based provider/receiver tasks. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, pp. 95–103. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics 10(1), 103–116 (2019)

    Baraka, K., Melo, F.S., Veloso, M.: Interactive robots with model-based ‘autism-like’ behav- iors. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics 10(1), 103–116 (2019)

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    In: International Conference on Social Robotics, pp

    Baraka, K., Veloso, M.: Adaptive interaction of persistent robots to user temporal prefer- ences. In: International Conference on Social Robotics, pp. 61–71. Springer (2015)

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    International Journal of Social Robotics10(1), 65–92 (2018)

    Baraka, K., Veloso, M.: Mobile service robot state revealing through expressive lights: For- malism, design, and evaluation. International Journal of Social Robotics10(1), 65–92 (2018)

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    Inter- national journal of social robotics 1(1), 71–81 (2009)

    Bartneck, C., Kuli ´c, D., Croft, E., Zoghbi, S.: Measurement instruments for the anthropo- morphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Inter- national journal of social robotics 1(1), 71–81 (2009)

    work page 2009

  21. [21]

    In: The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, pp

    Baxter, P., Kennedy, J., Senft, E., Lemaignan, S., Belpaeme, T.: From characterising three years of HRI to methodology and reporting recommendations. In: The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, pp. 391–398. IEEE Press (2016)

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 3(2), 74–99 (2014)

    Beer, J.M., Fisk, A.D., Rogers, W.A.: Toward a framework for levels of robot autonomy in human-robot interaction. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 3(2), 74–99 (2014)

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    Science Robotics 3(21) (2018)

    Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., Tanaka, F.: Social robots for education: A review. Science Robotics 3(21) (2018)

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    In: 2006 AAAI Fall Symposium Series, Aurally Informed Performance: Integrating Machine Listening and Auditory Presentation in Robotic Systems, Washington, DC (2006)

    Bethel, C.L., Murphy, R.R.: Auditory and other non-verbal expressions of affect for robots. In: 2006 AAAI Fall Symposium Series, Aurally Informed Performance: Integrating Machine Listening and Auditory Presentation in Robotic Systems, Washington, DC (2006)

    work page 2006

  25. [25]

    IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) 38(1), 83–92 (2008)

    Bethel, C.L., Murphy, R.R.: Survey of non-facial/non-verbal affective expressions for appearance-constrained robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) 38(1), 83–92 (2008)

    work page 2008

  26. [26]

    Bethel Cindy, L.: Robots without faces: non-verbal social human-robot interaction. Ph.D. thesis, dissertation/Ph.D.’s thesis]. University of South Florida (2009)

    work page 2009

  27. [27]

    Fuzzy sets and systems 127(1), 3–16 (2002)

    Bien, Z., Bang, W.C., Kim, D.Y ., Han, J.S.: Machine intelligence quotient: its measurements and applications. Fuzzy sets and systems 127(1), 3–16 (2002)

    work page 2002

  28. [28]

    In: Romansy 19–Robot Design, Dynamics and Control, pp

    Billard, A., Bonfiglio, A., Cannata, G., Cosseddu, P., Dahl, T., Dautenhahn, K., Mastrogio- vanni, F., Metta, G., Natale, L., Robins, B., et al.: The roboskin project: Challenges and re- sults. In: Romansy 19–Robot Design, Dynamics and Control, pp. 351–358. Springer (2013)

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    Assistive Technology 19(1), 37–49 (2007)

    Billard, A., Robins, B., Nadel, J., Dautenhahn, K.: Building Robota, a mini-humanoid robot for the rehabilitation of children with autism. Assistive Technology 19(1), 37–49 (2007)

    work page 2007

  30. [30]

    IEEE Intelligent Systems 31(3), 86–96 (2016)

    Biswas, J., Veloso, M.: The 1,000-km challenge: Insights and quantitative and qualitative results. IEEE Intelligent Systems 31(3), 86–96 (2016)

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    In: Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp

    Bonani, M., Oliveira, R., Correia, F., Rodrigues, A., Guerreiro, T., Paiva, A.: What my eyes can’t see, a robot can show me: Exploring the collaboration between blind people and robots. In: Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 15–27. ACM (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    Robotics and autonomous systems 42(3-4), 167–175 (2003)

    Breazeal, C.: Toward sociable robots. Robotics and autonomous systems 42(3-4), 167–175 (2003)

    work page 2003

  33. [33]

    IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) 34(2), 181–186 (2004)

    Breazeal, C.: Social interactions in hri: the robot view. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) 34(2), 181–186 (2004)

    work page 2004

  34. [34]

    In: Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems-V olume 3, pp

    Breazeal, C., Hoffman, G., Lockerd, A.: Teaching and working with robots as a collabora- tion. In: Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems-V olume 3, pp. 1030–1037. IEEE Computer Society (2004)

    work page 2004

  35. [35]

    MIT press (2004)

    Breazeal, C.L.: Designing sociable robots. MIT press (2004)

    work page 2004

  36. [36]

    In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems - IROS ’04, vol

    Breemen, A.V .: Animation engine for believable interactive user-interface robots. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems - IROS ’04, vol. 3, pp. 2873–2878 (2004). DOI 10.1109/IROS.2004.1389845

    work page doi:10.1109/iros.2004.1389845 2004

  37. [37]

    International journal of social robotics 1(4), 319 (2009) 36 Kim Baraka, Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, and Tiago Ribeiro

    Broadbent, E., Stafford, R., MacDonald, B.: Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: Review and future directions. International journal of social robotics 1(4), 319 (2009) 36 Kim Baraka, Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, and Tiago Ribeiro

    work page 2009

  38. [38]

    In: ICRA, p

    Bruce, A., Knight, J., Listopad, S., Magerko, B., Nourbakhsh, I.R.: Robot improv: Using drama to create believable agents. In: ICRA, p. 4003 (2000)

    work page 2000

  39. [39]

    Journal of rehabilitation research and development 37(6), 663–674 (2000)

    Burgar, C.G., Lum, P.S., Shor, P.C., Van der Loos, H.M.: Development of robots for rehabili- tation therapy: The Palo Alto V A/Stanford experience. Journal of rehabilitation research and development 37(6), 663–674 (2000)

    work page 2000

  40. [40]

    The Lancet Neurology 12(9), 851–852 (2013)

    Burton, A.: Dolphins, dogs, and robot seals for the treatment of neurological disease. The Lancet Neurology 12(9), 851–852 (2013)

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    Journal of physiology-Paris 103(3-5), 141–148 (2009)

    Buschmann, T., Lohmeier, S., Ulbrich, H.: Humanoid robot lola: Design and walking control. Journal of physiology-Paris 103(3-5), 141–148 (2009)

    work page 2009

  42. [42]

    International journal of social robotics 5(4), 593–618 (2013)

    Cabibihan, J.J., Javed, H., Ang, M., Aljunied, S.M.: Why robots? a survey on the roles and benefits of social robots in the therapy of children with autism. International journal of social robotics 5(4), 593–618 (2013)

    work page 2013

  43. [43]

    In: 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp

    Cannata, G., D’Andrea, M., Maggiali, M.: Design of a humanoid robot eye: models and experiments. In: 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp. 151–156. IEEE (2006)

    work page 2006

  44. [44]

    Autonomous Robots pp

    Cappo, E.A., Desai, A., Collins, M., Michael, N.: Online planning for human–multi-robot interactive theatrical performance. Autonomous Robots pp. 1–16 (2018)

    work page 2018

  45. [45]

    In: Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Con- ference on, pp

    Carlucci, F.M., Nardi, L., Iocchi, L., Nardi, D.: Explicit representation of social norms for social robots. In: Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Con- ference on, pp. 4191–4196. IEEE (2015)

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    In: Human- Robot Interaction (HRI), 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on, pp

    Chao, C., Cakmak, M., Thomaz, A.L.: Transparent active learning for robots. In: Human- Robot Interaction (HRI), 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on, pp. 317–324. IEEE (2010)

    work page 2010

  47. [47]

    In: International Con- ference on Technologies for E-Learning and Digital Entertainment, pp

    Chen, G.D., Wang, C.Y ., et al.: A survey on storytelling with robots. In: International Con- ference on Technologies for E-Learning and Digital Entertainment, pp. 450–456. Springer (2011)

    work page 2011

  48. [48]

    Review of educational research 53(4), 445–459 (1983)

    Clark, R.E.: Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of educational research 53(4), 445–459 (1983)

    work page 1983

  49. [49]

    2012, pp

    Colton, S., Wiggins, G.A., et al.: Computational creativity: The final frontier? In: Ecai, vol. 2012, pp. 21–16. Montpelier (2012)

    work page 2012

  50. [50]

    IEEE Intelligent Systems 21(3), 82–84 (2006)

    Coradeschi, S., Saffiotti, A.: Symbiotic robotic systems: Humans, robots, and smart environ- ments. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21(3), 82–84 (2006)

    work page 2006

  51. [51]

    In: Procs 13th IEEE Int Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN (2004)

    Dautenhahn, K.: Robots we like to live with! a developmental perspective on a personal- ized, life-long robot companion. In: Procs 13th IEEE Int Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN (2004)

    work page 2004

  52. [52]

    Philo- sophical transactions of the royal society B: Biological sciences 362(1480), 679 (2007)

    Dautenhahn, K.: Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interaction. Philo- sophical transactions of the royal society B: Biological sciences 362(1480), 679 (2007)

    work page 2007

  53. [53]

    In: 3rd European Workshop on Advanced Mobile Robots, Eurobot 1999, pp

    Dautenhahn, K., Billard, A.: Studying robot social cognition within a developmental psychol- ogy framework. In: 3rd European Workshop on Advanced Mobile Robots, Eurobot 1999, pp. 187–194. IEEE (1999)

    work page 1999

  54. [54]

    2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, pp

    Dautenhahn, K., Woods, S., Kaouri, C., Walters, M.L., Koay, K.L., Werry, I.: What is a robot companion-friend, assistant or butler? In: Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2005.(IROS 2005). 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, pp. 1192–1197. IEEE (2005)

    work page 2005

  55. [55]

    In: Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on Designing pleasurable products and interfaces, pp

    DiSalvo, C., Gemperle, F.: From seduction to fulfillment: the use of anthropomorphic form in design. In: Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on Designing pleasurable products and interfaces, pp. 67–72. ACM (2003)

    work page 2003

  56. [56]

    In: Proceedings of the 4th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, pp

    DiSalvo, C.F., Gemperle, F., Forlizzi, J., Kiesler, S.: All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads. In: Proceedings of the 4th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, pp. 321–326. ACM (2002)

    work page 2002

  57. [57]

    In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction, pp

    Dragan, A.D., Lee, K.C., Srinivasa, S.S.: Legibility and predictability of robot motion. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction, pp. 301–308. IEEE Press (2013)

    work page 2013

  58. [58]

    Cognition & emotion 6(3-4), 169–200 (1992) An extended framework for characterizing social robots 37

    Ekman, P.: An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & emotion 6(3-4), 169–200 (1992) An extended framework for characterizing social robots 37

    work page 1992

  59. [59]

    Ergonomics 42(3), 462–492 (1999)

    Endsley, M.R.: Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and work- load in a dynamic control task. Ergonomics 42(3), 462–492 (1999)

    work page 1999

  60. [60]

    Psychological review 114(4), 864 (2007)

    Epley, N., Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J.T.: On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropo- morphism. Psychological review 114(4), 864 (2007)

    work page 2007

  61. [61]

    Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics 8(1), 18–38 (2017)

    Esteban, P.G., Baxter, P., Belpaeme, T., Billing, E., Cai, H., Cao, H.L., Coeckelbergh, M., Costescu, C., David, D., De Beir, A., et al.: How to build a supervised autonomous system for robot-enhanced therapy for children with autism spectrum disorder. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics 8(1), 18–38 (2017)

    work page 2017

  62. [62]

    Robotics and Au- tonomous Systems 87, 363–371 (2017)

    Eyssel, F.: An experimental psychological perspective on social robotics. Robotics and Au- tonomous Systems 87, 363–371 (2017)

    work page 2017

  63. [63]

    In: Robot and Human Inter- active Communication, 2009

    Faber, F., Bennewitz, M., Eppner, C., Gorog, A., Gonsior, C., Joho, D., Schreiber, M., Behnke, S.: The humanoid museum tour guide Robotinho. In: Robot and Human Inter- active Communication, 2009. RO-MAN 2009. The 18th IEEE International Symposium on, pp. 891–896. IEEE (2009)

    work page 2009

  64. [64]

    Center for Robotics and Embedded Systems, Los Ange- les, CA (2011)

    Fasola, J., Mataric, M.: Comparing physical and virtual embodiment in a socially assistive robot exercise coach for the elderly. Center for Robotics and Embedded Systems, Los Ange- les, CA (2011)

    work page 2011

  65. [65]

    In: Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005

    Feil-Seifer, D., Mataric, M.J.: Defining socially assistive robotics. In: Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005. 9th International Conference on, pp. 465–468. IEEE (2005)

    work page 2005

  66. [66]

    Interaction Studies 8(3), 423–439 (2007)

    Feil-Seifer, D., Skinner, K., Matari ´c, M.J.: Benchmarks for evaluating socially assistive robotics. Interaction Studies 8(3), 423–439 (2007)

    work page 2007

  67. [67]

    human teachers

    Fernández-Llamas, C., Conde, M.A., Rodríguez-Lera, F.J., Rodríguez-Sedano, F.J., García, F.: May i teach you? students’ behavior when lectured by robotic vs. human teachers. Com- puters in Human Behavior 80, 460–469 (2018)

    work page 2018

  68. [68]

    In: Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2004 (IROS 2004)

    Fincannon, T., Barnes, L.E., Murphy, R.R., Riddle, D.L.: Evidence of the need for social intelligence in rescue robots. In: Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2004 (IROS 2004). Pro- ceedings. 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, vol. 2, pp. 1089–1095. IEEE (2004)

    work page 2004

  69. [69]

    In: International Conference on Social Robotics, pp

    Fink, J.: Anthropomorphism and human likeness in the design of robots and human-robot interaction. In: International Conference on Social Robotics, pp. 199–208. Springer (2012)

    work page 2012

  70. [70]

    Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., Dautenhahn, K.: A survey of socially interactive robots: concepts, design and applications. Tech. Rep. CMU-RI-TR-02-29, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University (2002)

    work page 2002

  71. [71]

    Human-Computer Interaction 19(1), 25–59 (2004)

    Forlizzi, J., DiSalvo, C., Gemperle, F.: Assistive robotics and an ecology of elders living independently in their homes. Human-Computer Interaction 19(1), 25–59 (2004)

    work page 2004

  72. [72]

    In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp

    Friedman, B., Kahn Jr, P.H., Hagman, J.: Hardware companions?: What online aibo discus- sion forums reveal about the human-robotic relationship. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 273–280. ACM (2003)

    work page 2003

  73. [73]

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences365(1537), 165–176 (2010)

    Frith, U., Frith, C.: The social brain: allowing humans to boldly go where no other species has been. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences365(1537), 165–176 (2010)

    work page 2010

  74. [74]

    Harcourt Brace College Publishers (1996)

    Gardner, H., Kornhaber, M.L., Wake, W.K.: Intelligence: Multiple perspectives. Harcourt Brace College Publishers (1996)

    work page 1996

  75. [75]

    Scientific American 296(1), 58–65 (2007)

    Gates, B.: A robot in every home. Scientific American 296(1), 58–65 (2007)

    work page 2007

  76. [76]

    In: XIV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2016, pp

    Georgiadis, D., Christophorou, C., Kleanthous, S., Andreou, P., Santos, L., Christodoulou, E., Samaras, G.: A robotic cloud ecosystem for elderly care and ageing well: The growmeup approach. In: XIV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2016, pp. 919–924. Springer (2016)

    work page 2016

  77. [77]

    ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI ’12 p

    Gielniak, M.J., Thomaz, A.L.: Enhancing interaction through exaggerated motion synthesis. ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI ’12 p. 375 (2012). DOI 10.1145/2157689.2157813

    work page doi:10.1145/2157689.2157813 2012

  78. [78]

    In: Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on, pp

    Glas, D.F., Minato, T., Ishi, C.T., Kawahara, T., Ishiguro, H.: Erica: The erato intelligent conversational android. In: Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on, pp. 22–29. IEEE (2016) 38 Kim Baraka, Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, and Tiago Ribeiro

    work page 2016

  79. [79]

    In: Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2005 (IROS 2005)

    Gockley, R., Bruce, A., Forlizzi, J., Michalowski, M., Mundell, A., Rosenthal, S., Sellner, B., Simmons, R., Snipes, K., Schultz, A.C., et al.: Designing robots for long-term social inter- action. In: Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2005 (IROS 2005). 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, pp. 1338–1343. IEEE (2005)

    work page 2005

  80. [80]

    In: The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003

    Goetz, J., Kiesler, S., Powers, A.: Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to im- prove human-robot cooperation. In: The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003., pp. 55–60. Ieee (2003)

    work page 2003

Showing first 80 references.