pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19225 · v1 · pith:RPAAZGBYnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph

Elastic electron scattering from Zn, Cd, and Hg

Mehrdad Adibzadeh , Constantine E. Theodosiou This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 02:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph
keywords elastic electron scatteringzinccadmiummercurycross sectionspolarization potentialdifferential cross sections
0
0 comments X

The pith

Elastic electron scattering cross sections are calculated for zinc, cadmium, and mercury using a self-consistent semi-empirical method.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies an established calculation approach to zinc, cadmium, and mercury to generate differential, integrated, and momentum transfer cross sections for elastic electron scattering. The method is self-consistent and incorporates a polarization potential with a semi-empirically adjusted cut-off radius, extending prior successful applications to inert gases and alkaline-earth metals. A sympathetic reader would care because these results are positioned to supply reliable theoretical data for these atoms based on the method's track record of agreement with experiments and other theories.

Core claim

We present an extensive set of theoretical results for differential, integrated, and momentum transfer cross sections for the elastic scattering of electrons by zinc, cadmium, and mercury. This study extends the application of our method of calculations, previously employed for stable inert gases and alkaline-earth-metals. Our approach is a self-consistent calculation, with a semi-empirical element in the adjustable cut-off radius of the polarization potential. Our method is expected to provide a set of accurate data for Zn, Cd and Hg, based on the satisfactory agreement in our previous investigations with experimental values and other precise theoretical results.

What carries the argument

Self-consistent calculation with a polarization potential whose cut-off radius is adjusted semi-empirically to model the incoming electron's effect on the target atom.

If this is right

  • The calculations supply a set of data for Zn, Cd, and Hg expected to match experiment closely.
  • The results extend the range of atoms for which the method has been shown to work well.
  • These cross sections can be compared directly with future measurements or independent theories.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same approach could be tested on additional heavy atoms to check consistency across the periodic table.
  • The cross section values may help model electron behavior in vapors or plasmas containing these metals.

Load-bearing premise

The semi-empirically chosen cut-off radius for the polarization potential will give accurate results for Zn, Cd, and Hg as it did for the atoms studied in prior work.

What would settle it

New experimental measurements of differential cross sections for low-energy electron scattering from Zn, Cd, or Hg that differ markedly from the calculated values.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.19225 by Constantine E. Theodosiou, Mehrdad Adibzadeh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Differential cross sections for elastic electron scattering from zinc at 10, 15, 20 and 25 eV: The legend in the figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Same as for figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Integrated ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: A three-dimensional view of differential cross section for elastic electron scattering from zinc. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Differential cross sections for elastic electron scattering from cadmium at 3.4, 6.4, 10 and 15 eV: The legend in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Same as for figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Same as for figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Integrated ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: A three-dimensional view of differential cross section for elastic electron scattering from cadmium. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Differential cross sections for elastic electron scattering from cadmium at scattering angles 24 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Differential cross sections for elastic electron scattering from mercury at 1.4, 2.4, 3.9 and 9 eV: The legend in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Differential cross sections for elastic electron scattering from mercury at 12.2, 15, 17.5 and 20 eV: The legend in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Differential cross sections for elastic electron scattering from mercury at 25, 35, 40 and 50 eV: The legend in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: Differential cross sections for elastic electron scattering from mercury at 60, 100, 150 and 300 eV: The legend in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Differential cross sections for elastic electron scattering from mercury at 400, 500, 800 and 1000 eV: The legend in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: Integrated ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17: A magnified view of the integrated cross section plot of figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18: A three-dimensional view of differential cross section for elastic electron scattering from mercury. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_18.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present an extensive set of theoretical results for differential, integrated, and momentum transfer cross sections for the elastic scattering of electrons by zinc, cadmium, and mercury. This study extends the application of our method of calculations, previously employed for stable inert gases and alkaline-earth-metals. Our approach is a self-consistent calculation, with a semi-empirical element in the adjustable cut-off radius of the polarization potential. Our method is expected to provide a set of accurate data for Zn, Cd and Hg, based on the satisfactory agreement in our previous investigations with experimental values and other precise theoretical results.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents calculations of differential, integrated, and momentum transfer cross sections for elastic electron scattering from Zn, Cd, and Hg. It extends a self-consistent method previously applied to inert gases and alkaline-earth metals, incorporating a semi-empirical adjustable cut-off radius in the polarization potential, and asserts that the results should be accurate based on prior agreement with experiment and other theories.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work would supply a useful dataset for electron scattering on these d-block atoms, where data are relatively sparse. The extension of an established computational approach is a modest but positive contribution to atomic collision physics.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2 (Theoretical framework): The claim that the method will yield accurate data for Zn, Cd, and Hg rests on transferability of the adjustable cut-off radius r_c of the polarization potential. No explicit procedure for selecting or validating r_c for these atoms is shown, nor is a sensitivity analysis or direct comparison to r_c values from the prior noble-gas/alkaline-earth cases provided; this leaves the accuracy assertion dependent on an untested semi-empirical choice rather than a demonstrated parameter-free or re-optimized derivation.
minor comments (2)
  1. Results tables would benefit from inclusion of estimated uncertainties or direct side-by-side comparison with recent experimental or other theoretical values for at least one energy.
  2. [Abstract] Clarify the precise energy range and angular coverage of the reported cross sections in the abstract or introduction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive feedback. We address the major comment point by point below and indicate the revisions we plan to make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2 (Theoretical framework): The claim that the method will yield accurate data for Zn, Cd, and Hg rests on transferability of the adjustable cut-off radius r_c of the polarization potential. No explicit procedure for selecting or validating r_c for these atoms is shown, nor is a sensitivity analysis or direct comparison to r_c values from the prior noble-gas/alkaline-earth cases provided; this leaves the accuracy assertion dependent on an untested semi-empirical choice rather than a demonstrated parameter-free or re-optimized derivation.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that the selection of the cut-off radius r_c requires more explicit documentation to support the claim of accuracy. In our prior works on inert gases and alkaline-earth metals, r_c was adjusted semi-empirically to achieve optimal agreement with available experimental differential cross sections at low energies while maintaining the self-consistent nature of the calculation. For Zn, Cd, and Hg, we used r_c values determined by a similar fitting procedure to the limited available data and by analogy to the neighboring atoms in the periodic table. To address this concern, we will revise Section 2 to include: (i) the specific r_c values employed for each target atom, (ii) a comparison table with r_c from previous studies, and (iii) a sensitivity analysis demonstrating that the cross sections are robust against small changes in r_c. This will make the semi-empirical aspect more transparent without altering the core results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Accuracy claim for Zn/Cd/Hg reduces to transfer of semi-empirical cut-off radius from prior fits

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "Our approach is a self-consistent calculation, with a semi-empirical element in the adjustable cut-off radius of the polarization potential. Our method is expected to provide a set of accurate data for Zn, Cd and Hg, based on the satisfactory agreement in our previous investigations with experimental values and other precise theoretical results."

    The adjustable cut-off radius is tuned semi-empirically on prior atoms; the claim that the identical method will be accurate for Zn, Cd, Hg therefore imports the fitted value as the basis for the new results rather than deriving them independently.

full rationale

The paper's central expectation of accurate cross sections for the new targets rests on the prior performance of the same self-consistent method (including its adjustable polarization cut-off) on other atoms. No independent derivation or re-optimization of the cut-off radius is shown for Zn, Cd, or Hg; the accuracy is therefore carried by the fitted parameter's transferability rather than by a parameter-free calculation or new external validation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on one semi-empirical parameter and the assumption that prior method performance transfers to these elements.

free parameters (1)
  • cut-off radius of the polarization potential
    Semi-empirical adjustable parameter introduced to model polarization effects; value chosen per atom or case.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The self-consistent scattering method validated on inert gases and alkaline-earth metals extends directly to Zn, Cd, and Hg with only the polarization cut-off adjusted.
    Invoked when stating that the approach will yield accurate data for the new elements.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5618 in / 1086 out tokens · 39742 ms · 2026-05-20T02:55:28.643770+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Adibzadeh and C

    M. Adibzadeh and C. E. Theodosiou, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables91, 8 (2005), ISSN 0092-640X, URLhttps: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092640X05000343. 6

    work page 2005

  2. [2]

    Adibzadeh and C

    M. Adibzadeh and C. E. Theodosiou, Phys. Rev. A70, 052704 (2004), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevA.70.052704

    work page 2004

  3. [3]

    Adibzadeh, C

    M. Adibzadeh, C. E. Theodosiou, and N. J. Harmon, Atoms12(2024), ISSN 2218-2004, URLhttps://www.mdpi.com/ 2218-2004/12/6/33

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    R. B. Brode, Phys. Rev.35, 504 (1930), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.35.504

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.35.504 1930

  5. [5]

    E. C. Childs, H. S. W. Massey, and E. Rutherford, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character141, 473 (1933), https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rspa.1933.0131, URLhttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/ doi/abs/10.1098/rspa.1933.0131

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1933.0131 1933

  6. [6]

    Williams and D

    W. Williams and D. Bozinis, Phys. Rev. A12, 57 (1975), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.12.57

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.12.57 1975

  7. [7]

    P. D. Burrow, J. A. Michejda, and J. Comer, Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics9, 3225 (1976), URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3700/9/18/014

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3700/9/18/014 1976

  8. [8]

    B. P. Marinkovi´ c, R. Panajotovi´ c, D.ˇSevi´ c, R. P. McEachran, G. Garc´ ıa, F. Blanco, and M. J. Brunger, Phys. Rev. A99, 062702 (2019), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.062702

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.99.062702 2019

  9. [9]

    D. B. McGarrah, A. J. Antolak, and J. Williamson, W., Journal of Applied Physics69, 6812 (1991), ISSN 0021-8979, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article-pdf/69/10/6812/18643209/6812 1 online.pdf, URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1063/1.347670

    work page 1991

  10. [10]

    Yuan and Z

    J. Yuan and Z. Zhang, Phys. Rev. A45, 535 (1992), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.45.535

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.45.535 1992

  11. [11]

    Kumar, A

    P. Kumar, A. K. Jain, A. N. Tripathi, and S. N. Nahar, Phys. Rev. A49, 899 (1994), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.49.899

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.49.899 1994

  12. [12]

    Born, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics34, 909 (2001), URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/34/6/313

    M. Born, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics34, 909 (2001), URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/34/6/313

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3727/34/6/313 2001

  13. [13]

    R. D. White, R. P. McEachran, R. E. Robson, M. T. Elford, and K. Bartschat, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics37, 021 (2004), URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/37/22/021

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3727/37/22/021 2004

  14. [14]

    D. V. Fursa, I. Bray, R. Panajotovi´ c, D.ˇSevi´ c, V. Pejˇ cev, D. M. Filipovi´ c, and B. P. Marinkovi´ c, Phys. Rev. A72, 012706 (2005), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.72.012706

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.72.012706 2005

  15. [16]

    C. J. Bostock, D. V. Fursa, and I. Bray, Phys. Rev. A85, 062707 (2012), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevA.85.062707

    work page 2012

  16. [17]

    R. P. McEachran, B. P. Marinkovi´ c, G. Garc´ ıa, R. D. White, P. W. Stokes, D. B. Jones, and M. J. Brunger, Jour- nal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data49, 013102 (2020), ISSN 0047-2689, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jpr/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.5135573/19747681/013102 1 online.pdf, URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.5135573

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5135573/19747681/013102 2020

  17. [18]

    Arretche, W

    F. Arretche, W. Tenfen, and B. K. Sahoo, Atoms10(2022), ISSN 2218-2004, URLhttps://www.mdpi.com/2218-2004/ 10/3/69

    work page 2022

  18. [19]

    J. C. Nogueira, W. R. Newell, and W. M. Johnston, Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics20, L537 (1987), URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3700/20/16/005

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3700/20/16/005 1987

  19. [20]

    Marinkovi´ c, V

    B. Marinkovi´ c, V. Pejˇ cev, D. Filipovi´ c, and L. Vuˇ skovi´ c, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics24, 1817 (1991), URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/24/7/029

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-4075/24/7/029 1991

  20. [21]

    J. E. Kontros, L. Sz´ ot´ er, I. V. Chernyshova, and O. B. Shpenik, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics35, 2195 (2002), URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/35/10/301

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-4075/35/10/301 2002

  21. [22]

    J. E. Kontros, I. V. Chernyshova, and O. B. Shpenik, Technical Physics48, 964 (2003), URLhttps://doi.org/10.1134/ 1.1607490

    work page 2003

  22. [23]

    J. P. Sullivan, P. D. Burrow, D. S. Newman, K. Bartschat, J. A. Michejda, R. Panajotovic, M. Moghbelalhossein, R. P. McEachran, and S. J. Buckman, New Journal of Physics5, 159 (2003), URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ 5/1/159

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ 2003

  23. [24]

    Marinkovi´ c, R

    B. Marinkovi´ c, R. McEachran, D. Fursa, I. Bray, H. Umer, F. Blanco, M. Brunger, L. Campbell, and D. Jones, Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data52(2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [25]

    A. W. Pangantiwar and R. Srivastava, Phys. Rev. A40, 2346 (1989), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevA.40.2346

    work page 1989

  25. [26]

    S. N. Nahar, Phys. Rev. A43, 2223 (1991), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.43.2223

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.43.2223 1991

  26. [27]

    D. H. Madison, K. Bartschat, and R. Srivastava, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics24, 1839 (1991), URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/24/7/030

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-4075/24/7/030 1991

  27. [28]

    M. J. Berrington, C. J. Bostock, D. V. Fursa, I. Bray, R. P. McEachran, and A. D. Stauffer, Phys. Rev. A85, 042708 (2012), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.85.042708

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.85.042708 2012

  28. [29]

    M. M. Haque, A. K. Haque, M. A. Uddin, M. Maaza, M. A. R. Patoary, A. K. Basak, and B. C. Saha (Academic Press, 2021), vol. 84 ofAdvances in Quantum Chemistry, pp. 1–72, URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0065327620300046

    work page 2021

  29. [30]

    L. R. Maxwell, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences12, 509 (1926), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.12.8.509, URLhttps://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.12.8.509

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.12.8.509 1926

  30. [31]

    Beuthe, Annalen der Physik389, 949 (1928), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/andp.19283892402, URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/andp.19283892402

    H. Beuthe, Annalen der Physik389, 949 (1928), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/andp.19283892402, URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/andp.19283892402

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.19283892402 1928

  31. [32]

    T. J. Jones, Phys. Rev.32, 459 (1928), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.32.459

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.32.459 1928

  32. [33]

    R. B. Brode, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character125, 134 (1929), https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rspa.1929.0156, URLhttps: 7 //royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/abs/10.1098/rspa.1929.0156

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1929.0156 1929

  33. [34]

    F. L. Arnot, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character130, 655 (1931), https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rspa.1931.0031, URLhttps: //royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/abs/10.1098/rspa.1931.0031

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1931.0031 1931

  34. [35]

    R. R. Palmer, Phys. Rev.37, 70 (1931), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.37.70

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.37.70 1931

  35. [36]

    Kessler and H

    J. Kessler and H. Lindner, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik183, 1 (1965)

    work page 1965

  36. [37]

    Deichsel, E

    H. Deichsel, E. Reichert, and H. Steidl, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik189, 212 (1966)

    work page 1966

  37. [38]

    J. P. Bromberg, The Journal of Chemical Physics51, 4117 (1969), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/51/9/4117/18865009/4117 1 online.pdf, URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.1672634

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1672634 1969

  38. [39]

    Gronemeier, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik A Hadrons and nuclei232, 483 (1970)

    K.-H. Gronemeier, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik A Hadrons and nuclei232, 483 (1970)

    work page 1970

  39. [40]

    D¨ uweke, N

    M. D¨ uweke, N. Kirchner, E. Reichert, and S. Schon, Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics9, 1915 (1976), URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3700/9/11/017

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3700/9/11/017 1915

  40. [41]

    Jost and B

    K. Jost and B. Ohnemus, Phys. Rev. A19, 641 (1979), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.19.641

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.19.641 1979

  41. [42]

    G. F. Hanne, K. J. Kollath, and W. Wubker, Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics13, L395 (1980), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3700/13/12/009

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3700/13/12/009 1980

  42. [43]

    Holtkamp, K

    G. Holtkamp, K. Jost, F. J. Peitzmann, and J. Kessler, Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics20, 4543 (1987), URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3700/20/17/030

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3700/20/17/030 1987

  43. [44]

    F. J. Peitzmann and J. Kessler, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics23, 4005 (1990), URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/23/21/030

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-4075/23/21/030 1990

  44. [45]

    Panajotovi´ c, V

    R. Panajotovi´ c, V. Pejˇ cev, M. Konstantinovi´ c, D. Filipovi´ c, V. Boˇ cvarski, and B. Marinkovi´ c, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics26, 1005 (1993), URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/26/5/020

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-4075/26/5/020 1993

  45. [46]

    Zubek, A

    M. Zubek, A. Danjo, and G. C. King, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics28, 4117 (1995), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/28/18/014

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-4075/28/18/014 1995

  46. [47]

    C. W. McCutchen, Phys. Rev.112, 1848 (1958), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.112.1848

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.112.1848 1958

  47. [48]

    Fink and A

    M. Fink and A. C. Yates, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables1, 385 (1969), ISSN 0092-640X, URLhttps://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092640X6980029X

    work page 1969

  48. [49]

    S. D. Rockwood, Phys. Rev. A8, 2348 (1973), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.8.2348

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.8.2348 1973

  49. [50]

    D. W. Walker, Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics8, L161 (1975), URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ 0022-3700/8/9/004

    work page 1975

  50. [51]

    L. T. S. F. Lam, Australian Journal of Physics33, 261 (1980)

    work page 1980

  51. [52]

    M. T. Elford, Australian Journal of Physics33, 251 (1980)

    work page 1980

  52. [53]

    R. P. McEachran and A. D. Stauffer, Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics20, 5517 (1987), URLhttps: //dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3700/20/20/027

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3700/20/20/027 1987

  53. [54]

    England and M

    J. England and M. Elford, Australian journal of physics44, 647 (1991)

    work page 1991

  54. [55]

    J. E. Sienkiewicz, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics30, 1261 (1997), URLhttps://dx.doi. org/10.1088/0953-4075/30/5/019

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-4075/30/5/019 1997

  55. [56]

    D. V. Fursa, I. Bray, and G. Lister, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics36, 4255 (2003), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/36/21/006

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-4075/36/21/006 2003

  56. [57]

    D. V. Fursa and I. Bray, AIP Conference Proceedings697, 175 (2003), ISSN 0094-243X, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article-pdf/697/1/175/11445185/175 1 online.pdf, URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1. 1643694

    work page doi:10.1063/1 2003

  57. [58]

    R. P. McEachran and M. T. Elford, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics36, 427 (2003), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/36/3/303

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-4075/36/3/303 2003

  58. [60]

    C. J. Bostock, D. V. Fursa, and I. Bray, Phys. Rev. A82, 022713 (2010), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevA.82.022713

    work page 2010

  59. [61]

    M. M. Haque, A. K. F. Haque, P. P. Bhattacharjee, M. A. Uddin, M. A. R. Patoary, A. K. Basak, M. Maaza, and B. C. Saha, Molecular Physics117, 2303 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2018.1548712, URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1080/00268976.2018.1548712

    work page doi:10.1080/00268976.2018.1548712 2019

  60. [62]

    J. B. Furness and I. E. McCarthy, Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics6, 2280 (1973), URLhttps: //dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3700/6/11/021

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3700/6/11/021 1973

  61. [63]

    D. Kolb, W. R. Johnson, and P. Shorer, Phys. Rev. A26, 19 (1982), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA. 26.19

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva 1982

  62. [64]

    Salvat, J

    F. Salvat, J. Fern´ andez-Varea, and W. Williamson, Computer Physics Communications90, 151 (1995), ISSN 0010-4655, URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/001046559500039I. 8 15 eV Marinković et al. BSR ROP CCC Present 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 Angel (deg) 25 eV 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000dσ/dΩ ( a02sr-1) 10 eV 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 0 30 60 90...

    work page arXiv 1995