Diffusion Limit and the optimal convergence rate of the classical solution to the one-species Vlasov-Maxwell-Boltzmann system

Anita Yang; Ke Chen; Mingying Zhong

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 33 references

Diffusion Limit and the optimal convergence rate of the classical solution to the one-species Vlasov-Maxwell-Boltzmann system

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves an optimal-rate diffusion limit of the one-species Vlasov-Maxwell-Boltzmann system to the Navier-Stokes-Maxwell-Fourier system, with a precise initial-layer estimate.

desk verdict A technically strong one-species VMB to NSMF diffusion limit with the right rates, but the load-bearing semigroup decomposition (Theorem 2.17) is stated without proof. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.21729 v1 pith:RQCCEPHH submitted 2025-04-30 math.AP

Ke Chen , Anita Yang , Mingying Zhong This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AP MSC 76P0582C4082D05

keywords Vlasov-Maxwell-BoltzmannsystemdiffusionlimitspectralanalysisconvergencerateinitiallayerNavier-Stokes-Maxwell-Fourieroptimalsemigroupdecomposition

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that classical solutions of the one-species Vlasov-Maxwell-Boltzmann (VMB) system with small initial data near a global Maxwellian converge, as the mean free path $\varepsilon$ tends to zero, to solutions of the incompressible Navier-Stokes-Maxwell-Fourier (NSMF) system, and it gives a quantitative $L^\infty$ error bound. The bound splits into an algebraic decay term $\varepsilon|\ln\varepsilon|^4(1+t)^{-(5-\sigma)/8}$ and an initial-layer term $(1+t/\varepsilon)^{-1}$. When the initial data is already of fluid form, the error improves to $C\delta_0\,\varepsilon(1+t)^{-(5-\sigma)/8}$, uniform down to $t=0$. The paper identifies the high-oscillation semigroup component and the projected kinetic component as the sources of the initial layer, and claims the rate is optimal within this spectral approach.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Fourier-transformed linear VMB operator $\tilde A_\varepsilon(\xi)$ and its spectral decomposition. For small $\varepsilon|\xi|$ it has nine eigenvalues $\lambda_j(\varepsilon,\xi)=\varepsilon\eta_j(|\xi|)-\varepsilon^2 b_j(|\xi|)+O(\varepsilon^3|\xi|^3)$ (with a refined remainder $\varepsilon^3|\xi|^5/(1+|\xi|^2)$ for two branches), where $\eta_j$ are the acoustic, shear, and electromagnetic wave frequencies and $b_j$ are diffusion symbols whose low-frequency limits are the NSMF viscosity coefficients $\kappa_0,\kappa_1$. The semigroup is decomposed as $S_1+S_2+S_3$, with $S_1$ the low-frequency fluid part, $S_2$ the high-frequency oscillatory part, and $S_3$ bounded by $C e^{-dt/\varepsilon^2}$; comparing $S_1$ with the NSMF semigroup $Y_1$ gives the fluid approximation, while the oscillatory part is controlled by the dispersive estimate $\|\mathcal F^{-1}(e^{\pm i\sqrt{1+|\xi|^2}t/\varepsilon}(1+|\xi|^2)^{-5/4})\|_{L^p_x}\le C(t/\varepsilon)^{3/p-3/2}$.

What would settle it

Reconstruct the proof of Theorem 2.17 and verify that the constants $C$ and $d$ in the remainder bound are independent of $\varepsilon$ and $\xi$, especially in the intermediate band $r_0\le \varepsilon|\xi|\le r_1$. If the spectral gap of Lemma 2.6(2) or the decay constant $d$ degenerates as $\varepsilon\to 0$, the $L^\infty$ rate in Theorem 1.2 cannot hold uniformly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.2: for small initial data, the $L^\infty$ distance between the VMB solution $U_\varepsilon$ and the NSMF solution $U_1$ obeys (1.23), and under the fluid-type compatibility condition (1.20) the stronger bound (1.24) holds. The proof splits the difference into the linear semigroup error $e^{t/\varepsilon^2 A_\varepsilon}U_0 - Y_1(t)P_AU_0$, the error from comparing the Boltzmann quadratic nonlinearity with the NSMF nonlinear fluxes, and the error in the Duhamel terms generated by both systems. Each piece is controlled by spectral asymptotics of the linear VMB operator at low frequency, by exponential-in-$\varepsilon^{-2}$ decay of the semigroup remainder, and by Klein-Gordon-type dispersive estimates for the oscillatory eigenvalues. The paper claims these estimates give the first optimal convergence rate for the classical solution of the one-species VMB system toward its fluid limit, together with a precise description of the initial layer.

Load-bearing premise

The proof leans on Theorem 2.17, the semigroup decomposition whose proof is omitted; if its remainder bound $C e^{-dt/\varepsilon^2}$ is not uniform in $\xi$ and $\varepsilon$, the stated convergence-rate estimate does not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The diffusion limit of the one-species VMB system holds in $L^\infty$ with the explicit error rate (1.23), not merely qualitatively.
For fluid-type initial data satisfying (1.20), the convergence is uniform up to $t=0$ and the error is of order $\varepsilon$ with time decay $(1+t)^{-(5-\sigma)/8}$.
The initial layer is generated precisely by the oscillatory semigroup component $U_\varepsilon^{\mathrm{osc}}$ and the projected kinetic part $e^{t/\varepsilon^2 A_\varepsilon}P_BU_0$, and it decays like $(1+t/\varepsilon)^{-1}$.
Within the spectral method, the $\varepsilon|\ln\varepsilon|^4$ factor and the $(1+t/\varepsilon)^{-1}$ layer are claimed to be optimal, so no improvement in the $\varepsilon$-power is available from the eigenprojection estimates used here.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same semigroup comparison should transfer to the two-species VMB system, where the fluid limit is the Navier-Stokes-Maxwell system with Ohm's law; the diffusion symbols $b_j$ here are the direct analogues of the transport coefficients needed there.
The logarithmic factor $\varepsilon|\ln\varepsilon|^4$ likely enters through a low-frequency estimate of the eigenprojections, and sharper $L^p$ dispersive estimates might remove part of the logarithm while keeping the $\varepsilon$-order rate.
A natural extension is to check whether the same rate survives under softer collision kernels, where the collision frequency $\nu(v)$ decays and the eigenvalue expansions would change form.
The uniform bound under (1.20) suggests that generic kinetic initial layers are the only obstruction to $O(\varepsilon)$ convergence; one could test whether projecting out the high-oscillation components restores $O(\varepsilon)$ for arbitrary small initial data.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things to know about this paper. First, it does supply the first explicit convergence rate and initial-layer estimate for the one-species VMB diffusion limit to NSMF, and most of the proof is carried out in detail. Second, the load-bearing semigroup decomposition, Theorem 2.17, is stated without proof, with the sentence 'For brevity, we omit the details of the proof.' That theorem's uniform remainder bound e^{-dt/ε²} is used in every convergence-rate lemma that follows. Until it is proved, the main theorem is not actually established.

What is new and good: the eigenvalue expansions for the one-species VMB operator in Lemmas 2.11–2.13, the fluid approximation estimates in Lemmas 3.3 and 3.5, and the bootstrap argument in Section 4. The framework is adapted from the authors' earlier spectral analysis [24] and the two-species result [33], but the extension is nontrivial: the one-species operator has a different spectral structure and the limiting NSMF system carries the incompressibility constraint. The viscosity coefficients are computed explicitly. The initial-layer estimate and the improved ε(1+t)^{-(5-σ)/8} bound under the well-prepared condition (1.20) are genuine contributions. The citation pattern is fine; the imported spectral lemmas are parameter-free analytical results, not self-referential.

Where it is soft. The omitted proof of Theorem 2.17 is the main problem. The stress-test note is right: the uniformity of the remainder in ξ and ε is not obvious. In the high-frequency region ε|ξ| ≥ r1, the eigenvalues have real part roughly -Cε/|ξ|, which tends to zero as |ξ| grows. The resolvent estimates in Lemmas 2.4 and 2.16 carry constants like δ^{-1} and (1+ε|ξ|)^{-1/2}, and assembling those into a uniform e^{-dt/ε²} bound is exactly the kind of argument that can fail. The decomposition may well be true, but it is not demonstrated here. This is a load-bearing gap, not a matter of exposition. Also, the 'optimal' label is an overclaim: the paper proves an upper bound on the error, with no matching lower bound. If 'optimal' means 'the rate matches the linearized decay,' it is defensible, but the word is not supported as proved. The global existence Lemmas 4.3 and 4.5 are delegated to prior references; acceptable for a paper of this length, but the nonlinear well-posedness is an import.

Who this is for: researchers working on kinetic fluid limits, especially the spectral route to diffusion limits for VMB and VPB systems. It deserves a serious referee. Send it to peer review, but the referee should require a complete proof of Theorem 2.17, or a precise reference that covers this exact uniformity statement, before the main theorem can be accepted.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies the diffusive limit of the one-species Vlasov-Maxwell-Boltzmann (VMB) system (1.2) near a global Maxwellian, with initial data independent of ε. It proves that the global strong solution converges to the solution of the incompressible Navier-Stokes-Maxwell-Fourier (NSMF) system (1.17), with a rate involving ε|ln ε|^4 (1+t)^{-(5-σ)/8} and an initial-layer term (1+t/ε)^{-1} (Theorem 1.2, (1.23)), and an improved rate ε(1+t)^{-(5-σ)/8} under well-prepared data (1.24). The proof is based on spectral analysis of the linearized operator A_ε(ξ), including eigenvalue expansions for ε|ξ| small, high-frequency analysis for ε|ξ| large, a semigroup decomposition, and a nonlinear bootstrap. Theorem 1.1 states global existence and decay for both the VMB and the NSMF systems.

Significance. If completed, the paper would close a genuine gap: a quantitative diffusion-limit rate with explicit initial-layer estimate for the one-species VMB system in the whole space. The spectral expansions (Lemmas 2.11-2.13), the high-frequency eigenvalue analysis (Lemma 2.15), and the nonlinear bootstrap are carried out in detail, and the viscosity coefficients κ0 and κ1 (1.19) are derived explicitly from the linearized collision operator rather than left as free parameters. The sharpened ε-factor under the well-prepared initial condition (1.24) is a valuable addition. The main caveat is that the load-bearing semigroup decomposition (Theorem 2.17) is stated without proof, and the global-existence parts of the nonlinear theorems are delegated to analogous arguments; these gaps need to be closed before the main claims are fully supported.

major comments (3)

[Theorem 2.17 (Section 2.3)] The semigroup decomposition in Theorem 2.17, in particular the uniform remainder bound (2.111), is stated with the sentence "For brevity, we omit the details of the proof" and is used as the backbone of the convergence-rate estimates. It drives the ε|ξ| factor in Lemma 3.2, the estimates of I4 and J4 in Lemmas 3.3 and 3.5, and the S3 contributions in Lemma 3.6. The uniformity in ξ and ε is not a routine consequence of the resolvent estimates in Lemmas 2.4 and 2.16, since in the high-frequency region the eigenvalues β_j have Re β_j ≈ -C ε/|ξ| (Lemma 2.15) and approach the imaginary axis as |ξ|→∞; separating S2 from S3 by a contour while keeping constants independent of ξ and ε requires a delicate argument that is not supplied. Please include the proof, or state precisely which theorem in [24] (with assumptions and conclusion) covers (2.108)-(2.111) in full.
[Lemmas 4.3 and 4.5 (Section 4.1)] The global existence of the VMB solution (Theorem 1.1) is delegated in Lemma 4.3 to "the similar argument used in [10,24,29]", and the existence part of Lemma 4.5 for the NSMF system is dismissed with "the details are omitted." Since Theorem 1.2 uses these solutions and their decay estimates as the starting point of the bootstrap, the nonlinear well-posedness part is not self-contained as written. The authors should either provide the proofs in an appendix or give exact theorem statements with hypotheses from the cited references, rather than relying on an informal delegation.
[Theorem 1.2 (Section 1)] The title and abstract claim an "optimal convergence rate", but the manuscript proves only upper bounds (1.23)-(1.24); no lower bound is established showing that the ε factor in (1.24) or the exponents cannot be improved. If "optimal" is meant in the sense of the best rate obtainable by the present spectral method, that should be stated explicitly; otherwise a sharpness argument or a precise reference to one is required.

minor comments (2)

[Lemma 3.2 proof] In the proof of Lemma 3.2, the displayed identity for V0 - Pε(ξ)V0 should have the second sum restricted to j = -1,0,1,2,3 (matching the definition of Pε); as written, the equality is false because the second sum runs over all j = -1,...,7 while Pε only includes j = -1,...,3.
[Throughout] There are several typographical errors: "electro and magnetic fields" should be "electric and magnetic fields", "ration" should be "ratio", "cosntant" should be "constant", and "genetic constants" in the proof of Lemma 3.6 should be "generic constants".

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the diffusion-limit rate is obtained from spectral estimates and semigroup comparisons that are not equivalent to the claimed convergence by construction.

full rationale

The derivation chain for Theorem 1.2 does not reduce to its inputs. The NSMF coefficients κ0 and κ1 are defined in (1.19) directly from the linearized collision operator L via (−L−1P1(v1χ2),v1χ2) and (−L−1P1(v1χ4),v1χ4); they are not fitted to the VMB solution or to the convergence rate. The semigroup Y1(t) is defined in (3.4)-(3.7) as the fluid eigenmode part of the linearized VMB semigroup and is independently shown in Lemma 3.1 to solve the NSMF system (3.3), so comparing e^{t/ε² Aε} with Y1 is a genuine remainder estimate rather than a tautology. The convergence estimates in Lemmas 3.3 and 3.5 use eigenvalue expansions (2.80)-(2.81), eigenfunction bounds (2.83)-(2.85), and decay lemmas (5.1)-(5.6); none of these inputs contain the conclusion of Theorem 1.2. The sharper bound (1.24) is conditional on (1.20), and the vanishing of the oscillatory terms under (1.20) is shown by direct spectral coefficient calculation; this is a sufficient condition, not a restatement of the result. The paper does rely on prior work by overlapping authors: Theorem 2.17's proof is omitted with 'For brevity, we omit the details of the proof' and delegated to an argument 'similar to that of Theorem 3.4 in [24]', and Lemmas 2.4 and 2.14 are quoted from [33]. These are parameter-free spectral/resolvent estimates with stated assumptions and do not assume the diffusion limit or its rate; accordingly, under the review rules they count as independent support rather than circularity. The omitted proof of (2.111) is a completeness/correctness risk—the uniform ξ,ε bound on S3 is load-bearing—but a missing proof is not a circular reduction. Similarly, the word 'optimal' in the title is not supported by a matching lower bound, another non-circular gap. No step was found in which a prediction is equal by construction to a fitted input or in which a claimed derivation is equivalent to its own assumptions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard kinetic theory assumptions, the explicit ε scaling of the VMB system, ε-independent small initial data, and spectral theorems borrowed from the authors' previous papers. There are no fitted constants: coefficients κ0 and κ1 are defined by collision operator inner products, and the rate is derived, not matched to data.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Collision kernel is the hard-sphere cutoff kernel, giving collision frequency ν(v) with ν0(1+|v|) ≤ ν(v) ≤ ν1(1+|v|).
Invoked in (1.11)-(1.12) and used throughout for the essential spectrum bound Re λ ≤ -ν0 in Lemma 2.3.
standard math Linearized collision operator L is non-positive with spectral gap: (Lf,f) ≤ -μ‖P1 f‖^2.
Standard consequence of the H-theorem for hard potentials; used in (1.16) and Lemma 2.8 to invert the microscopic part.
ad hoc to paper The scaling relation β = αγ/ε holds, and the paper chooses α = β = γ = ε.
This choice produces system (1.2); it is a modeling and scaling assumption inherited from the physical regime, not derived in the paper.
domain assumption Initial data U0 = (f0,E0,B0) is independent of ε and small in X^6_1 ∩ L1, or H^6 ∩ L1 under (1.20).
Smallness and ε-independence enable the uniform bootstrap in Theorem 1.2; the proof does not treat data depending on ε.
standard math Spectral estimates from the authors' earlier papers are used without re-proof: Lemma 2.4 from [33], Lemma 2.14 from [33], and the semigroup decomposition scheme of Theorem 3.4 in [24].
These are parameter-free analytical results with stated assumptions; they are independent support for the present claim even though the authors overlap.
standard math The operators L^{-1}P1(v1χi) inner products define positive coefficients κ0, κ1 via (1.19).
Positivity follows from dissipativity of L; the coefficients appear as diffusion coefficients in the limiting NSMF system and in the eigenvalue expansions (2.82).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Diffusion Limit and the optimal convergence rate of the classical solution to the one-species Vlasov-Maxwell-Boltzmann system." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RQCCEPHH

@misc{pith2026250421729,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Diffusion Limit and the optimal convergence rate of the classical solution to the one-species Vlasov-Maxwell-Boltzmann system},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RQCCEPHH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.21729}
}

read the original abstract

In the present paper, we study the diffusion limit of the strong solution to the one-species Vlasov-Maxwell-Boltzmann (VMB) system with initial data near a global Maxwellian. Based on spectral analysis techniques, we prove the convergence and establish the convergence rate of the classical solution to the VMB system towards the solution to the incompressible Navier--Stokes--Maxwell system with a precise estimation on the initial layer.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

[24]

Li, H.-L., Yang, T., Zhong, M.-Y.: Spectrum Structure a nd Behaviors of the Vlasov-Maxwell-Boltzmann Systems. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 48(1), 595-669, 2016

work page 2016
[33]

Diffusion Limit with Optimal Convergence Rate of Classical Solutions to the Vlasov-Maxwell-Boltzmann System

Yang, T., Zhong, M.-Y.: Diﬀusion limit with optimal con vergence rate of classical solutions to the Vlasov– Maxwell–Boltzmann system. Preprint (2024), arXiv:2404.18389

work page Pith review arXiv 2024
[1]

From the Vlasov-Maxwell-Boltzmann system to incompressib le viscous electro- magneto-hydrodynamics, European Mathematical Society Press, 2016

Ars´ enio, D., Saint-Raymond, L. From the Vlasov-Maxwell-Boltzmann system to incompressib le viscous electro- magneto-hydrodynamics, European Mathematical Society Press, 2016

work page 2016
[2]

Fluid dynamic lim its of kinetic equations I: Formal derivations, J

Bardos, C., Golse F., and Levermore, D. Fluid dynamic lim its of kinetic equations I: Formal derivations, J. Statist. Phys., 63 (1991), 323-344

work page 1991
[3]

and Levermore, D

Bardos, C., Golse, F. and Levermore, D. Fluid dynamic lim its of kinetic equations II: Convergence proofs for the Boltzmann equation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 46 (1993), 667-753

work page 1993
[4]

The classical incompressible Nav ier-Stokes limit of the Boltzmann equation, Math

Bardos C., and Ukai, S. The classical incompressible Nav ier-Stokes limit of the Boltzmann equation, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. , 1 (1991), 235-257

work page 1991
[5]

Cercignani C., Illner R., Pulvirenti M.: The Mathematical Theory of Dilute Gases , AMS. Vol. 106. Springer-Verlag, New York (1994)

work page 1994
[6]

Cambridge University Press, London (1970)

Chapman S., Cowling T.G.: The mathematical theory of non-uniform gases , 3rd edition. Cambridge University Press, London (1970)

work page 1970

Show all 33 references

[7]

Duan, R.J., Liu, S., Yang, T., Zhao, H.: Stability of the n onrelativistic Vlasov-Maxwell-Boltzmann system for angular non-cutoﬀ potentials, Kinet. Relat. Models , 6(1) 159-204, 2013

2013
[8]

Duan, R.J., Lei, Y., Yang, T., Zhao, H.: The Vlasov-Maxwe ll-Boltzmann System Near Maxwellians in the Whole Space with Very Soft Potentials, Comm. Math. Phys. 351, 95-153, 2017

2017
[9]

Duan, R.J.: Dissipative property of the Vlasov-Maxwell -Boltzmann System with a uniform ionic background. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 43(6), 2732-2757 (2011)

2011
[10]

Duan, R.J., Strain R.M.: Optimal large-time behavior o f the Vlasov-Maxwell-Boltzmann system in the whole space. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 64, 1497-1546 (2011)

2011
[11]

and Saint-Raymond, L.: The Navier-Stokes lim it of the Boltzmann equation for bounded collision kernels

Golse, F. and Saint-Raymond, L.: The Navier-Stokes lim it of the Boltzmann equation for bounded collision kernels. Invent. Math. 155(2004), no. 1, 81-161

2004
[12]

Springer

Grafakos, L.: Classical Fourier Analysis. Springer. ( 2008)

2008
[13]

and Jang, J.: Global Hilbert Expansion for the Vl asov-Poisson-Boltzmann System

Guo, Y. and Jang, J.: Global Hilbert Expansion for the Vl asov-Poisson-Boltzmann System. Comm. Math. Phys. , 299 (2010), 469-501

2010
[14]

Guo, Y.: The Vlasov-Maxwell-Boltzmann system near Max wellians. Invent. Math. , 153(3), 593-630 (2003)

2003
[15]

Pure Appl

Guo, Y.: Boltzmann diﬀusive limit beyond the Navier-St okes approximation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 59 (2006), 626-687

2006
[16]

Jang, J.: Vlasov-Maxwell-Boltzmann diﬀusive limit. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 194, 531-584 (2009)

2009
[17]

preprint, arXiv: 2308.12607

Jiang, N., and Lei, Y.: The incompressible Navier-Stok es-Fourier-Maxwell system limits of the Vlasov-Maxwell- Boltzmann system for soft potentials: the noncutoﬀ cases an d cutoﬀ cases. preprint, arXiv: 2308.12607

arXiv
[18]

Annals of PDE (2022) 8:4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40818-022-00117-6

Jiang, N., Luo, Y.-L.: From Vlasov-Maxwell-Boltzmann system to two-ﬂuid incompressible Navier-Stokes- Fourier-Maxwell system with Ohm’s law: convergence for cla ssical solutions. Annals of PDE (2022) 8:4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40818-022-00117-6

2022 doi
[19]

Jiang, N., Luo, Y.-L., Zhang, T.: Hydrodynamic limit of the incompressible Navier-Stokes-Fourier-Maxwell syste m with Ohm’s law from the Vlasov-Maxwell-Boltzmann system: H ilbert expansion approach. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. (2023) 247:55

2023
[20]

Springer, New York (1996)

Kato, T.: Perturbation Theory of Linear Operator . Springer, New York (1996)

1996
[21]

Li, H.-L., Yang T., Zhong M.-Y.: Diﬀusion limit of the Vl asov-Poisson-Boltzmann system. Kinet. Relat. Models , 14(2), 2022: 211-255. Doi: 10.3934/krm.2021003

2022 doi
[22]

Li, H.-L., Yang T., Zhong M.-Y.: Spectral analysis for t he Vlasov-Poisson-Boltzmann system. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 241 (2021), no. 1, 311-355

2021
[23]

Indiana Univ

Li, H.-L., Yang T., Zhong M.-Y.: Spectrum analysis and o ptimal Decay rates of the bipolar Vlasov-Poisson- Boltzmann equations. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 65 (2016), 665–725

2016
[25]

Esposito, R

De Masi, A. Esposito, R. and Lebowitz, J. L.: Incompress ible Navier-Stokes and Euler limits of the Boltzmann equation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 42, (1989), 1189-1214

1989
[26]

Nishida, K.: Fluid dynamical limit of the nonlinear Bol tzmann equation to the level of the compressible Euler equation, Comm. Math. Phys. , 61, (1978), 119-148

1978
[27]

Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 154, (1971)

Nelson, S.: On Some Solutions to the Klein-Gordon Equat ion Related to an Integral of Sonine. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 154, (1971). 227–237

1971
[28]

Pazy A.: Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications to Partial Diﬀerential Equations . AMS Vol. 44. Springer- Verlag, New York, (1983)

1983
[29]

M.: The Vlasov-Maxwell-Boltzmann system in t he whole space

Strain R. M.: The Vlasov-Maxwell-Boltzmann system in t he whole space. Comm. Math. Phys. 268(2), 543-567 (2006)

2006
[30]

JA Barth

Triebel, H.: Interpolation theory, function spaces, d iﬀerential operators. JA Barth . (1995)

1995
[31]

Wang, Y.J.: The Diﬀusive Limit of the Vlasov-Boltzmann System for Binary Fluids, SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 43(1), (2011), 253-301. 54 Vlasov-Maxwell-Boltzmann system

2011
[32]

Wu, W., Zhou, F., Gong, W., and Xu, Y.: Diﬀusive Limit of t he One-species Vlasov-Maxwell-Boltzmann System for Cutoﬀ Hard Potentials. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 57 (2) (2025) 1526-1585

2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [24]

Li, H.-L., Yang, T., Zhong, M.-Y.: Spectrum Structure a nd Behaviors of the Vlasov-Maxwell-Boltzmann Systems. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 48(1), 595-669, 2016

work page 2016

[2] [33]

Diffusion Limit with Optimal Convergence Rate of Classical Solutions to the Vlasov-Maxwell-Boltzmann System

Yang, T., Zhong, M.-Y.: Diﬀusion limit with optimal con vergence rate of classical solutions to the Vlasov– Maxwell–Boltzmann system. Preprint (2024), arXiv:2404.18389

work page Pith review arXiv 2024

[3] [1]

From the Vlasov-Maxwell-Boltzmann system to incompressib le viscous electro- magneto-hydrodynamics, European Mathematical Society Press, 2016

Ars´ enio, D., Saint-Raymond, L. From the Vlasov-Maxwell-Boltzmann system to incompressib le viscous electro- magneto-hydrodynamics, European Mathematical Society Press, 2016

work page 2016

[4] [2]

Fluid dynamic lim its of kinetic equations I: Formal derivations, J

Bardos, C., Golse F., and Levermore, D. Fluid dynamic lim its of kinetic equations I: Formal derivations, J. Statist. Phys., 63 (1991), 323-344

work page 1991

[5] [3]

and Levermore, D

Bardos, C., Golse, F. and Levermore, D. Fluid dynamic lim its of kinetic equations II: Convergence proofs for the Boltzmann equation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 46 (1993), 667-753

work page 1993

[6] [4]

The classical incompressible Nav ier-Stokes limit of the Boltzmann equation, Math

Bardos C., and Ukai, S. The classical incompressible Nav ier-Stokes limit of the Boltzmann equation, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. , 1 (1991), 235-257

work page 1991

[7] [5]

Cercignani C., Illner R., Pulvirenti M.: The Mathematical Theory of Dilute Gases , AMS. Vol. 106. Springer-Verlag, New York (1994)

work page 1994

[8] [6]

Cambridge University Press, London (1970)

Chapman S., Cowling T.G.: The mathematical theory of non-uniform gases , 3rd edition. Cambridge University Press, London (1970)

work page 1970