REVIEW 2 cited by
A significance test for forward stepwise model selection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We apply the methods developed by Lockhart et al. (2013) and Taylor et al. (2013) on significance tests for penalized regression to forward stepwise model selection. A general framework for selection procedures described by quadratic inequalities includes a variant of forward stepwise with grouped variables, allowing us to handle categorical variables and factor models. We provide an algorithm to compute a new statistic with an exact null distribution conditional on the outcome of the model selection procedure. This new statistic, which we denote $T\chi$, has a truncated $\chi$ distribution under the global null. We apply this test in forward stepwise iteratively on the residual after each step. The resulting method has the computational strengths of stepwise selection and addresses the problem of invalid test statistics due to model selection. We illustrate the flexibility of this method by applying it to several specialized applications of forward stepwise including a hierarchical interactions model and a recently described additive model that adaptively chooses between linear and nonlinear effects for each variable.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Statistical Test for Saliency Maps of Graph Neural Networks via Selective Inference
A selective inference framework computes valid p-values for GNN saliency maps by conditioning on the selected salient subgraph, controlling the Type I error rate.
-
Sampling models for selective inference
The paper proves that two forms of ancillarity are preserved under conditioning on a selection event and uses this to guide sampling-model choice in selective inference.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.