Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 45 references

A comparative study of quaternionic rotational Dirac equation and its interpretation

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper says a quaternionic spin-1/2 wave equation with angular momentum in place of linear momentum describes rotating particles and antiparticles.

desk verdict A formally tidy quaternionic rewrite of the Dirac equation whose central equation is dimensionally inconsistent and whose frequency formula has a sign error; no physical claim survives. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.02446 v2 pith:RROU6B7A submitted 2019-08-20 physics.gen-ph

B. C. Chanyal , Sandhya This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.gen-ph MSC 11R5281Q0520Gxx PACS 03.65.-w03.65.Fd02.10.Ud
keywords quaternionfour-vectorenergy-momentumrotationalmotionspin-1/2particlesDiracequationfrequency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to build a rotational analogue of the Dirac spin-1/2 wave equation using quaternions, with the four-angular momentum $L = R \circ P$ standing in for linear momentum, moment of inertia $I$ for mass, and $\lambda = c/R$ for the speed of light. In the proposed equation $(A \circ L - B\lambda^2 I) \circ \Psi = 0$, the scalar quaternionic component carries rotational energy $E_0 = r_0 p_0 - \vec{r}\cdot\vec{p}$ and the vector components carry rotational momentum $L_j = (r_0\vec{p} + p_0\vec{r}) + (\vec{r}\times\vec{p})_j$. Solving it with one-, two-, and four-component quaternionic spinors gives spin-up and spin-down energy and momentum states for both particles and antiparticles, and a plane-wave ansatz yields rotational frequencies $\omega_\pm$ and wave vectors $\vec{k}_\pm$. If this construction is right, a single quaternionic equation can carry the full rotational energy-momentum content of a spinning fermion, giving a common algebraic home for rest energy, rotational energy, and angular momentum.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the quaternionic algebra with basis $e_0, e_1, e_2, e_3$, together with the rotational substitution $L = R \circ P$, $I = M(R \circ R)$, and $\lambda = c/R$. The argument proceeds by writing the spin-1/2 wave-equation matrices as quaternionic D-matrices built from tau-matrices, expanding $A \circ L - B\lambda^2 I$ into scalar and vector parts, and then solving the resulting coupled equations with one-, two-, and four-component quaternionic spinors. This machinery is what makes energy and angular momentum appear as coefficients of $e_0$ and $e_j$ respectively in a single equation.

What would settle it

A direct check is dimensional: in Eq. (4.2), the scalar coefficient $E_0 = r_0 p_0 - \vec{r}\cdot\vec{p}$ has units of action, whereas $B\lambda^2 I$ has units of energy; if no unit convention makes the two expressions comparable, the equation cannot define a physical spectrum. The predicted sign-split rotational frequency $\omega_\pm$ could then be tested against rotating-frame spin measurements.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the generalized quaternionic equation $(A \circ L - B\lambda^2 I) \circ \Psi = 0$ is the rotational counterpart of the Dirac equation for spin-1/2 particles, obtained by replacing linear momentum with the quaternionic four-angular momentum $L = R \circ P$, mass with a quaternionic moment of inertia $I$, and the speed of light with $\lambda = c/R$. In this equation the $e_0$ component carries the rotational energy $E_0 = r_0 p_0 - \vec{r}\cdot\vec{p}$, the $e_j$ components carry the rotational momentum $L_j = (r_0\vec{p} + p_0\vec{r}) + (\vec{r}\times\vec{p})_j$, and plane-wave solutions split into particle and antiparticle branches with rotational frequency $\omega_\pm$ and wave vector $\vec{k}_\pm$. The authors further claim that one-, two-, and four-component quaternionic spinors give isomorphic energy and momentum solutions, so the equation provides a single framework for the dual energy and dual momentum of rotating fermions in Euclidean space-time.

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands on the assumed analogy that a rotating spin-1/2 particle can be described by substituting the four-angular momentum $L = R \circ P$ for linear momentum, moment of inertia for mass, and $\lambda = c/R$ for the speed of light in the standard wave equation; if that substitution is not physically valid, the derived rotational spectrum does not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the quaternionic rotational wave equation is correct, a rotating spin-1/2 particle's rest energy, rotational energy, and angular momentum are all components of one four-quantity, so no separate rotational equation is needed for energy and angular momentum.
  • The plane-wave solution yields the rotational dispersion $\omega_\pm = \pm \frac{\lambda}{\hbar}\sqrt{\lambda^2 I_0^2 - \hbar^2(\vec{e}\cdot\nabla_\Theta)^2}$, so particle and antiparticle states appear as the two signs, with a threshold set by $\lambda^2 I_0^2$.
  • The same equation yields a wave vector $\vec{k}_\pm$ for the rotating state, giving a full four-wave vector $(\omega, \vec{k})$ in Euclidean space-time and a rotational analogue of wave propagation.
  • Because the one-, two-, and four-component quaternionic spinor solutions are claimed to be isomorphic, the physical content of the equation does not depend on which representation of the spinor is chosen.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implicit extension is that the same substitution could be tried in other hypercomplex wave equations: replacing the four-momentum by a four-angular momentum in octonionic or sedenionic formulations would produce rotational spectra for systems with more internal degrees of freedom.
  • A testable extension is the classical limit: as $\vec{r}\cdot\vec{p}$ dominates $r_0 p_0$, the scalar energy $E_0$ reduces to $-\vec{r}\cdot\vec{p}$ and the vector momentum to $\vec{r}\times\vec{p}$, so the equation should recover ordinary rigid-body rotational mechanics.
  • Another consequence, if the derivation is sound, is that the sign of $\omega_\pm$ provides a rotational analogue of the particle-antiparticle energy gap, so a rotating-frame experiment measuring spin-dependent frequency shifts would be a direct probe of the theory.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a quaternionic generalization of the Dirac equation intended to describe rotating spin-1/2 particles. The authors replace, in the free Dirac equation, linear momentum p by quaternionic angular momentum L = R∘P, mass m by moment of inertia I, and light speed c by λ = c/R, where R is the four-dimensional radius. The resulting quaternionic rotational Dirac (QRD) equation (4.2) contains a scalar part identified with rotational energy and a vector part identified with rotational angular momentum. One-, two-, and four-component spinor solutions are derived for positive and negative energy states and for particle and antiparticle momentum states. Plane-wave ansätze lead to formulas for the rotational frequency (7.18) and wave-propagation vector (7.25). The paper claims a unified description of rotational energy and angular momentum for Dirac particles in Euclidean space-time.

Significance. If the construction were physically and dimensionally sound, the paper would offer a compact algebraic framework for rotational extensions of the Dirac equation, with explicit spinor solutions and falsifiable frequency/wave-vector predictions. The quaternionic algebra is developed in detail, and the paper contains a substantial amount of explicit calculation. However, the central equation is dimensionally inconsistent, and the main frequency formula contains a sign error that is internally inconsistent with the paper's own substitution. These are load-bearing problems: they affect the physical meaning of every energy and frequency result. The paper's contribution is therefore primarily algebraic, and its physical claims are not presently supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Secs. 3–4, Eqs. (3.8), (4.2), (5.1)–(5.4)] The QRD equation mixes quantities of different physical dimension. Eq. (3.8) defines E0 = r0p0 − r·p, which has dimensions of action (length × momentum), not energy. Meanwhile the term Bλ²I0 in Eq. (4.2) has dimensions of energy, since I = MR² and λ = 1/T. The scalar component of Eq. (4.9) therefore contains an action-valued first term added to energy-valued second and third terms. The identification of r0p0 with rest mass-energy (text after Eq. (3.8)) is incorrect: m0c² has units of energy while r0p0 has units of angular momentum or action. Consequently the energy equations (5.3)–(5.4), E0 ± λ²I0, add incommensurable quantities. No redefinition of the quaternionic basis fixes this; it is intrinsic to the substitution p → L.
  2. [Sec. 7, Eqs. (7.6)–(7.9), (7.13)–(7.16), (7.18)] The rotational frequency formula (7.18) has an internal sign inconsistency. From the matrix system (7.13)–(7.16), the nontrivial-solution condition is ℏ²ω² = λ⁴I0² − λ²(e·L)². With the paper's substitution L = −iℏ∇Θ and the quaternionic realization e_j = −iσ_j, one obtains (e·L)² = −ℏ²(e·∇Θ)², so that ℏ²ω² = λ⁴I0² + λ²ℏ²(e·∇Θ)². Eq. (7.18) instead contains a minus sign inside the square root. In addition, Eqs. (7.8)–(7.9) repeat the −λ²I0 sign of Eqs. (7.6)–(7.7), while Eqs. (5.7)–(5.8) require +λ²I0. Thus the step from (5.5)–(5.8) to (7.6)–(7.9) is itself inconsistent, and Eq. (7.18) is not a valid consequence of the stated equations.
  3. [Sec. 4, after Eq. (4.1)] The QRD equation is introduced by formal substitution (p → L, m → I, c → λ) into the free Dirac equation rather than derived from a dynamical principle or a Lagrangian. No physical argument is given for why these replacements preserve the structure of the Dirac equation, and the dimensional inconsistency noted above shows that the substitution as written does not produce a well-defined physical equation. The dual-energy and dual-momentum solutions are algebraic consequences of the initial substitution, not independent physical predictions. A derivation starting from, e.g., a rotational kinetic-energy operator or a Hamiltonian for a rigid rotor would be needed to justify the central equation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 5, Eqs. (5.10)–(5.13)] The normalization constants N_E± are written with L_j² in the denominator, but the equations involve the operator (e·L); the squared quantity should be the norm of (e·L) or the eigenvalue of its square, not a component index j. Please clarify.
  2. [Sec. 6, Eqs. (6.10)–(6.21)] The normalization constants N_L± contain a square root of a difference that can become imaginary for physical parameter values; the text does not discuss when these are real or how the complex normalization is interpreted.
  3. [Throughout] There are numerous typographical and notation issues, including 'Schrï¿œdinger' in the Introduction, 'indies' instead of 'indices' in Sec. 2, 'extant' instead of 'extend' in Sec. 6.2, and the notation iℏ ˙T in Eqs. (7.6)–(7.9), where the dot is placed ambiguously relative to ℏ. The manuscript would benefit from a careful proofreading pass.
  4. [Sec. 3, Eq. (3.13)] The interchange R ↔ P is stated to change the angular momentum, but the sign of the cross-product term in the displayed formula (−→r × −→p) appears to be inconsistent with the usual transformation; please verify the expression.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The 'dual energy' prediction is definitionally contained in the QRD ansatz: E0 is the e0 component of L, and Eq. (4.2) is Dirac's equation with p→L, m→I, c→λ.

  1. self definitional [Sec. 3, Eq. (3.8); Sec. 4, Eq. (4.2); Sec. 5, Eq. (5.1)]
    "E0 = r0p0 − (−→r · −→p ), (coefficient of e0). (3.8) ... Now, to check the energy and momentum relations of an electron rotating in quaternionic space-time, we can extend the Dirac equation (4.1) in term of QRD equation form, i.e. (A◦L − Bλ2I)◦Ψ = 0, (4.2) where A, L, B, I and Ψ are quaternionic variables considering for the rotational analogy of α, p, β, m and ψ, respectively. ... In order to attempt the energy solutions of QRD equation, we equate the scalar components (coefficient of e0) in given equation (4.9) as [D0(A)E0 −λ(D(A)·L) −Bλ2I0]Ψ = 0, (5.1)."

    The QRD equation (4.2) is not derived from a more fundamental principle; it is defined by substituting angular momentum L=R◦P for p, moment of inertia I for m, and λ=c/R for c in the free Dirac equation. The quantity called 'rotational energy' E0 was already defined in Eq. (3.8) as the e0 component of that same L. The energy solutions in Sec. 5 (e.g., E0±λ²I0) are just the diagonal entries obtained by separating the e0 component of Eq. (4.2), so the claimed prediction of dual energy is algebraically identical to the input ansatz. The 'dual momentum' solutions in Sec. 6 and the frequency formula (7.18) inherit the same construction; they are solutions of the posited equation, not independent empirical or first-principles outputs.

full rationale

I find no load-bearing self-citation: the citations to Chanyal's earlier work are background, and the key replacement λ=c/R is attributed to the external Carmeli/Malin reference [42]. There are no fitted parameters and no data subset. The circularity is of the definitional type: the paper openly constructs a Dirac-like equation by the rotational analogy, then reads the energy and momentum content back out of the same construction. The 'dual energy' language in the abstract is therefore an interpretation of the ansatz, not a prediction that could fail independently of the input equation. The dimensional inconsistency (E0 = r0p0−r·p has action units while λ²I has energy units) is a serious physical-correctness problem, but it is not itself a circularity argument and I do not count it in the score. Overall, partial circularity: central output reduces by construction to the input analogy, so score 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central construction rests on two ad hoc analogies: identifying quaternionic angular momentum as a momentum-like variable, and replacing c with c/R. No data are fitted, but the free scale R and the unspecified vector masses m_j enter all results, and the dimensional inconsistency of E0 is a load-bearing ad hoc assumption.

free parameters (2)
  • R (rotation radius)
    R enters through lambda = c/R and I = M R squared in Sec. 4. The frequency Eq. (7.18) and wave vector Eq. (7.25) depend on R, but no physical value, boundary condition, or fitting procedure is given.
  • m1, m2, m3 (vector mass components)
    Introduced in Eq. (3.1) as |p_j/v_j| and used in I_j and L_j. No values, equations of motion, or physical interpretation are supplied.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Quaternion algebra with basis (e0, e1, e2, e3) and multiplication (2.8) correctly represents rotations in Euclidean space-time.
    Standard algebraic fact, used throughout, not proven here.
  • domain assumption A rotating spin-1/2 particle can be described by making the replacements p to L = R composed with P, m to I, c to lambda = c/R in the Dirac equation (Eq. 4.2).
    This analogy is the foundation of the paper's equation; it is asserted in Sec. 4 and never derived.
  • domain assumption Four-dimensional Euclidean space-time, with r0 as time, is the appropriate arena for the Dirac equation.
    The paper works in Euclidean signature throughout (Eqs. 3.2-3.3); no justification relative to Minkowski spacetime is given.
  • ad hoc to paper E0 and L_j, as defined in Eqs. (3.8)-(3.9), have the physical dimensions of energy and angular momentum and can be used in Eq. (4.9).
    This is the assumption that fails dimensional analysis; E0 has action units, not energy.
  • domain assumption The substitution L to -i hbar grad_Theta for the angular nabla operator gives a valid dispersion relation.
    Introduced in Sec. 7 before Eq. (7.18), with citation [45], but no range or operator domain is specified.
invented entities (1)
  • Quaternionic four-angular momentum L = R composed with P
    purpose: Encodes rotational energy (scalar part) and angular momentum (vector part) in one quaternionic object, replacing p in the Dirac equation.
    Defined in Eq. (3.5) and used in Eq. (4.2). It has no independent empirical handle; its physical content is entirely that of the definitions of E0 and L_j.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A comparative study of quaternionic rotational Dirac equation and its interpretation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RROU6B7A

@misc{pith2026190902446,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A comparative study of quaternionic rotational Dirac equation and its interpretation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RROU6B7A}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.02446}
}
read the original abstract

In this study, we develop the generalized Dirac like four-momentum equation for rotating spin-half particles in four-dimensional quaternionic algebra. The generalized quaternionic Dirac equation consists the rotational energy and angular momentum of particle and anti-particle. Accordingly, we also discuss the four vector form of quaternionic relativistic mass, moment of inertia and rotational energy-momentum in Euclidean space-time. The quaternionic four angular momentum (i.e. the rotational analogy of four linear momentum) predicts the dual energy (rest mass energy and pure rotational energy) and dual momentum (linear like momentum and pure rotational momentum). Further, the solutions of quaternionic rotational Dirac energy-momentum are obtained by using one, two and four-component of quaternionic spinor. We also demonstrate the solutions of quaternionic plane wave equation which gives the rotational frequency and wave propagation vector of Dirac particles and anti-particles in terms of quaternionic form.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The Quantum theory of electron

    P. A. M. Dirac, “The Quantum theory of electron” , Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A, 117 (1928), 610

    work page 1928

  2. [2]

    Elements of Quaternions

    W. R. Hamilton, “Elements of Quaternions” , Vol. I & II, Chelsea Publishing, New York (1969), 1185

    work page 1969

  3. [3]

    On Quaternion and their Generalization and the History of t he eight square theorem

    L. E. Dickson, “On Quaternion and their Generalization and the History of t he eight square theorem”, Ann. Math., 20 (1919), 153

    work page 1919

  4. [4]

    The Dirac equation on the Quaternion field

    P. Rotelli, “The Dirac equation on the Quaternion field” , Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 4 (1989), 933

    work page 1989

  5. [5]

    Quaternion formulation of Dirac equation

    A. S. Rawat, S. Rawat, and O. P. S. Negi, “Quaternion formulation of Dirac equation” , Int. J. Theor. Phys. Appl. Sciences, 3 (2011), 1

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    Quaternionic Dirac equation and Supersymmetry

    S. Rawat, and O. P. S. Negi, “Quaternionic Dirac equation and Supersymmetry”, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 48 (2008), 2222

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    Rigid body dynamics in terms of quaternions: Hamil- tonian formulation and conserving integration

    P. Betsch, and R. Siebert, “Rigid body dynamics in terms of quaternions: Hamil- tonian formulation and conserving integration” , Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng. 79 (2009), 444

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Quaternions and Special Relativity

    S. D. Leo, “Quaternions and Special Relativity” , J. Math. Phys. 37 (1996), 2955

    work page 1996

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    The Quaternionic Dirac Lagrangian

    S. D. Leo, and P. Rotelli, “The Quaternionic Dirac Lagrangian” , Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 11 (1996), 357

    1996

  2. [10]

    Quaternionic formulation of tachyons, superluminal tran sformations and a complex space-time

    K. Imaeda, “Quaternionic formulation of tachyons, superluminal tran sformations and a complex space-time” , Lett. Nuovo Cimento, 50 (1979), 271

    1979

  3. [11]

    Quaternionic Wave Equation in Curved Space-Time

    J. D. Edmonds, “Quaternionic Wave Equation in Curved Space-Time” , Int. J. Theor. Phys., 10 (1974), 115. 21

    1974

  4. [12]

    Quaternionic formulation for electromagnetic-field equations

    O. P. S. Negi and B. S. Rajput, “Quaternionic formulation for electromagnetic-field equations” , Lett. Nuovo Cimento, 37 (1983), 325

    1983

  5. [13]

    Quaternion Gravi-Electromagnetism

    A. S. Rawat, and O. P. S. Negi, “Quaternion Gravi-Electromagnetism” , Int. J. Theor. Phys., 51 (2012), 738

    2012

  6. [14]

    Quaternionic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Fields

    S. L. Adler, “Quaternionic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Fields” , Oxford University Press, New York, (1995)

    1995

  7. [15]

    A Quaternionic Quantum Mechanics

    A. I. Arbab, “ A Quaternionic Quantum Mechanics ”, Appl. Phys. Res., 3 (2011), 160

    2011

  8. [16]

    Quaternionic particle in a relativistic box

    S. Giardino, “Quaternionic particle in a relativistic box” , Found. Phys. 46 (2016), 473

    2016

  9. [17]

    Quaternionic Approach to Dual Magneto- hydrodynamics of Dyonic cold plasma

    B. C. Chanyal and M. Pathak, “Quaternionic Approach to Dual Magneto- hydrodynamics of Dyonic cold plasma” , Adv. High Energy Phys., Article ID: 7843730 (2018), 1

    2018

  10. [18]

    Complex and quaternionic Analyticity in chiral and Gauge theories

    F. Gursey and H. C. Tze, “Complex and quaternionic Analyticity in chiral and Gauge theories” , Ann. of Phys., 128 (1980), 29

    1980

  11. [19]

    Quaternionic V ariational F ormalism for Poincare Gauge The ory and Supergravity

    K. Morita, “ Quaternionic V ariational F ormalism for Poincare Gauge The ory and Supergravity”, Prog. Theor. Phys., 73 (1985), 4

    1985

  12. [20]

    An extension of quaternionic matrices to octonions

    S. Morques and C. G. Oliveria, “An extension of quaternionic matrices to octonions”, J. Math. Phys., 26 (1985), 3131

    1985

  13. [21]

    Octonions, Quarks and QCD

    K. Morita, “Octonions, Quarks and QCD” , Prog. Theor. Phys., 65 (1981), 787

    1981

  14. [22]

    Generalized Octonion Electrodynam- ics

    B. C. Chanyal, P. S. Bisht and O. P. S. Negi, “Generalized Octonion Electrodynam- ics”, Int. J. Theor. Phys., 49 (2010), 1333

    2010

  15. [23]

    Octonion Quantum Chro- modynamics

    B. C. Chanyal, P. S. Bisht, Tianjun Li and O. P. S. Negi, “Octonion Quantum Chro- modynamics”, Int. J. Theor. Phys., 51 (2012), 3410

    2012

  16. [24]

    Octonion massive electrodynamics

    B. C. Chanyal, “Octonion massive electrodynamics”, Gen. Relativ. Gravit., 46 (2014), 16461

    2014

  17. [25]

    Octonion generalization of Pauli and Dirac matrices

    B. C. Chanyal, “Octonion generalization of Pauli and Dirac matrices ”, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys., 12 (2015), 1550007

    2015

  18. [26]

    Split octonion reformulation of generalized linear gravi tational field equations

    B. C. Chanyal, “Split octonion reformulation of generalized linear gravi tational field equations ”, J. Math. Phys., 56 (2015), 051702

    2015

  19. [27]

    Octonic representation of electromagnetic field equations

    V. L. Mironov and S. V. Mironov, “ Octonic representation of electromagnetic field equations”, J. Math. Phys., 50 (2009), 12901

    2009

  20. [28]

    Sedeonic Equations of Massive Fields

    V. L. Mironov and S. V. Mironov, “ Sedeonic Equations of Massive Fields ”, Int. J. Theor. Phys., 54 (2015), 153. 22

    2015

  21. [29]

    Sedenion unified theory of gravi-electromagnetism

    B. C. Chanyal, “Sedenion unified theory of gravi-electromagnetism ”, Indian J. Phys., 88 (2014), 1197

    2014

  22. [30]

    Some properties of dark matter field in the complex octonion space

    Zi-Hua Weng, “ Some properties of dark matter field in the complex octonion space”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 30 (2015), 1550212

    2015

  23. [31]

    Octonionic Maxwell’s equations for bi-isotropic me- dia

    M Tanışlı and M. E. Kansu, “ Octonionic Maxwell’s equations for bi-isotropic me- dia”, J. Math. Phys. 52 (2011), 053511

    2011

  24. [32]

    A compact biquaternionic formulation of massive field equa - tions in gravi-electromagnetism

    S. Demir, M. Tanisli, “A compact biquaternionic formulation of massive field equa - tions in gravi-electromagnetism”, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 126 (2011), 115

    2011

  25. [33]

    Quaternionic analysis, representation theory and physics

    I. Frenkel and M. Libine, “Quaternionic analysis, representation theory and physics”, Advances Math. 218 (2008), 1806

    2008

  26. [34]

    Quaternion generalization of super- Poincarￜ group

    B. C. S. Chauhan, P. K. Joshi and O. P. S. Negi, “Quaternion generalization of super- Poincarï¿œ group” , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 34 (2019), 1950006

    2019

  27. [35]

    Quaternion-based algorithm for micromagnetics

    P. B. Visscher and X. Feng, “Quaternion-based algorithm for micromagnetics” , Phys. Rev., B 65 (2012), 104412

    2012

  28. [36]

    Scattering in quantum mechanics under quater- nionic Dirac delta potential

    H. Sobhani and H. Hassanabadi, “Scattering in quantum mechanics under quater- nionic Dirac delta potential” , Canadian J. Phys., 94 (2016), 262

    2016

  29. [37]

    Delay time in quaternionic quantum mechanics

    S. D. Leo and G. Ducati, “Delay time in quaternionic quantum mechanics” , J. Math. Phys., 53 (2012), 022102

    2012

  30. [38]

    A relativistic quantum theory of dyons wave propagation

    B. C. Chanyal, “A relativistic quantum theory of dyons wave propagation”, Cana- dian J. Phys., 95 (2017), 1200

    2017

  31. [39]

    A new development in quantum field equations of dyons

    B. C. Chanyal, “A new development in quantum field equations of dyons”, Cana- dian J. Phys., 96 (2018), 1192

    2018

  32. [40]

    Field theory on R × S3 topology 1: The Klein-Gordon and Schrï¿œdinger equations

    M. Carmeli, “Field theory on R × S3 topology 1: The Klein-Gordon and Schrï¿œdinger equations” , Found. Phys., 15 (1983), 175

    1983

  33. [41]

    Field theory on R×S3 topology 11: The Weyl equation

    M. Carmeli and S. Malin, “Field theory on R×S3 topology 11: The Weyl equation” , Found. Phys., 15 (1984), 185

    1984

  34. [42]

    Field theory on R ×S3 topology 111: The Dirac equa- tion

    M. Carmeli and S. Malin, “Field theory on R ×S3 topology 111: The Dirac equa- tion” , Found. Phys., 15 (1985), 1019

    1985

  35. [43]

    Rigid body dynamics in terms of quaternions: Hamil- tonian formulation and conserving integration

    P. Betsch and R. Siebert, “Rigid body dynamics in terms of quaternions: Hamil- tonian formulation and conserving integration” , Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng. 79 (2009), 444

    2009

  36. [44]

    The Quaternionic Particle mass

    L. A. Glinka and A. W. Beckwith, “The Quaternionic Particle mass” , Prespacetime Journal, 3 (2012) 100

    2012

  37. [45]

    Angular momentum in Quantum mechanics

    A. R. Edmonds, “Angular momentum in Quantum mechanics” , Princeton Uni. Press, USA (1957) 13. 23

    1957

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.