Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 20 references

Circuit-Level Design, Modeling, and On-Wafer Characterization of a Coplanar THz Optoelectronic Mixer

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A photoconductive terahertz mixer can be designed and modeled as an integrated RF circuit: a parametric model reproduces its conversion loss within ±1 dB from 1 GHz to 500 GHz, with an effective carrier lifetime of about 0.8 ps and a geomet

desk verdict Genuinely new TMIC treatment of a THz photoconductive mixer with strong 500 GHz passive validation, but the flagship ±1 dB conversion-loss claim is a one-parameter fit and the probe de-embedding is scalar. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.03768 v1 pith:RRWC245Q submitted 2026-08-04 physics.app-ph

S. Islam , V. Merupo , C. Chamek , M. Sassi , C. Coinon , Y. Deblock , E. Okada , S. Lepilliet
show 8 more authors
F. Braud Q. Fornasiero G. Di Gioia M. Faucher G. Ducournau G. Loas S. Arscott E. Peytavit
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.app-ph
keywords optoelectronicmixerphotoconductivemixingterahertzmonolithicintegratedcircuitcoplanarwaveguideconversionlosson-wafercharacterizationparametricLT-GaAsphotoconductor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the first on-wafer circuit-level characterization of a photoconductive terahertz heterodyne mixer treated as a true monolithic integrated circuit rather than as an antenna-coupled device. It shows that a parametric model—using only the photoconductor's carrier lifetime and capacitance plus the measured coplanar-waveguide embedding—predicts the measured conversion loss within ±1 dB across the entire 1 GHz to 500 GHz band. The measured conversion loss is 22.5–25.5 dB below 320 GHz and 26–34 dB up to 500 GHz, comparable to prior photoconductive demonstrations but now obtained in a fully defined 50-ohm coplanar environment with known RF/IF embedding. If correct, this establishes that standard microwave circuit-design methods, not custom free-space optics, are sufficient to engineer and optimize future integrated THz photonic mixers.

What carries the argument

The engine is the time-varying photoconductance G(t) = G0 [1 + sin(2π f_LO t)] / sqrt(1 + (2π f_LO τ)^2), driven by the optical beat note; the photoconductor acts as a passive parametric switch that multiplies the RF voltage by G(t) to produce a downconverted component. This is embedded in a hybrid simulation framework that combines a frequency-domain ABCD-matrix solver for impedance matching and RF/IF filtering with a time-domain modified-nodal-analysis solver for nonlinear conversion, in which the coplanar-waveguide sections are represented by digital waveguide delay lines and the lumped elements by backward-Euler companion models. The CPW propagation constants come from measured test stru

What would settle it

Measure the RF probe's full two-port S-parameters (or a characterized on-wafer thru) up to 500 GHz and re-derive the conversion loss using the actual complex source impedance instead of the assumed 50-ohm perfect match; if the corrected curve departs from the simulation by more than ±1 dB anywhere in the band, the claimed agreement is an artifact of the de-embedding assumption.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a photoconductive heterodyne mixer, when embedded in a coplanar matching network with a shunt resistor, series DC-block, and shunt decoupling capacitor, behaves as a passive parametric frequency converter whose conversion loss is fully described by a circuit-level model with physically constrained parameters. The model fixes the photoconductor capacitance to the geometry-computed value C_pc ≈ 10.8 fF and adjusts only the effective carrier lifetime, finding τ ≈ 0.8 ps; with these values it reproduces the measured conversion loss within ±1 dB from 1 GHz to 500 GHz. The same model, validated in the dark up to 500 GHz by VNA measurements, predicts an input return lo

Load-bearing premise

The measured conversion loss is computed assuming the THz probe and source are perfectly 50-ohm matched at every frequency, with only the probe's scalar insertion loss subtracted; if the probe's actual impedance varies with frequency or has a reactive part, the reported available-power conversion loss—and therefore the ±1 dB model agreement—is biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A photoconductive heterodyne mixer can be specified and simulated with standard RF figures of merit, enabling direct benchmarking against electronic Schottky mixers and insertion into larger THz systems.
  • The validated model transfers unchanged to a series–shunt resistive matching variant (R_s,m = 20 Ω, R_p = 100 Ω) that simulation shows keeps |S11| below about −10 dB across the whole 0.001–0.5 THz band, at a cost of 2.8–4.5 dB of conversion loss—an explicit, application-dependent trade-off.
  • Because the SOI platform supports backside handle removal, the same TMIC topology can migrate to membrane-supported modules with rectangular-waveguide transitions or onto micromachined silicon probe tips for on-wafer spectrum analysis, without rederiving the mixing model.
  • The dominant conversion-loss physics up to 500 GHz is captured by just two photoconductor parameters (τ and C_pc) plus the embedding network; higher-order parasitic effects remain second-order in this frequency range.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The τ ≈ 0.8 ps best fit is an effective lifetime under continuous-wave pumping, about 0.3 ps longer than the ≈0.5 ps value from pulsed photoreflectance; the difference likely reflects trap emptying under steady illumination, so treating τ as pump-power dependent could refine the model.
  • The scalar de-embedding of the THz probe makes the ±1 dB agreement partly hostage to the assumption of a purely real, 50-ohm probe impedance; a full two-port probe characterization would reveal whether the agreement survives a more realistic embedding.
  • The same G(t) parametric-mixer formalism should apply to other photoconductive materials, such as iron-doped InGaAs for 1550-nm operation, so the design methodology may transfer to telecom-wavelength THz receivers rather than remaining exclusive to 780-nm LT-GaAs.
  • The conversion-loss penalty of broadband resistive matching quantifies a fundamental sensitivity-versus-flatness trade-off; a reactive (hence lossless) matching network, not explored here, might recover several dB of sensitivity at a specific sub-band while sacrificing the decade-scale bandwidth.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports the design, fabrication, and on-wafer characterization of a photoconductive terahertz heterodyne mixer implemented as a coplanar true-terahertz monolithic integrated circuit (TMIC). The mixer combines an LT-GaAs microcavity photoconductor with a CPW embedding comprising a Ti shunt resistor, a series MIM DC-blocking capacitor, and a shunt RF/IF-decoupling capacitor. A hybrid distributed/lumped circuit model is developed, with the passive network validated by dark VNA measurements up to 500 GHz. Under illumination, the measured and simulated conversion losses are reported to agree within ±1 dB over 1–500 GHz, using an effective carrier lifetime τ ≈ 0.8 ps and a geometry-computed photoconductor capacitance Cpc ≈ 10.8 fF; the measured conversion loss is 22.5–25.5 dB below 320 GHz and 26–34 dB up to 500 GHz. The paper claims this is the first quantitative on-wafer characterization of an optoelectronic mixer circuit over such a broad band.

Significance. If the model validation is accepted, this is a valuable contribution to the circuit-level design methodology of THz photonic mixers. The paper's strengths include the dark-state VNA validation of the passive embedding up to 500 GHz, the wideband conversion-loss comparison, the use of a geometry-derived Cpc rather than a purely free capacitance, and the clear discussion of the trade-off between return-loss flatness and conversion-loss penalty. The treatment of the mixer with standard RF metrics (return loss, isolation, conversion loss) is a meaningful step beyond antenna-coupled or uncontrolled-probe demonstrations. However, the central predictive claim is weakened by the fact that τ is fitted to the same measured conversion-loss curve, and by the scalar de-embedding assumption that is acknowledged but not quantified. These issues are load-bearing because the paper's contribution is framed as a validated circuit model, not merely as a new device demonstration.

major comments (3)
  1. [§IV-C, Figs. 6–7] The abstract and conclusion state that the model 'predicts' conversion loss within ±1 dB, but τ is selected as the value giving best agreement with the same measured conversion-loss curve (Fig. 6), and Fig. 7 further chooses Cpc = 11.25 fF from the same data. The ±1 dB agreement is therefore a post-fit agreement, not an independent prediction. This is load-bearing because the central claim is model validation. Please reframe the wording (e.g., 'post-fit agreement'), report the sensitivity of the ±1 dB band to the fitted parameters, and preferably provide an independent τ measurement under equivalent CW optical pumping conditions.
  2. [§IV-B and §IV-C] The conversion-loss de-embedding uses scalar insertion loss under the assumption of ideal 50-ohm matching, while the text acknowledges that 'the impedance presented by the probes to the circuit is expected to vary with frequency and is unlikely to remain purely real.' If the RF probe output impedance is not 50 Ω, the available power at the circuit input is not simply the waveguide power minus the probe S21 magnitude; it depends on the interaction between the probe output reflection and the mixer input reflection. The simulation assumes an ideal 50 Ω source, so measurement and simulation share this assumption, and the claimed ±1 dB agreement could partly reflect a common systematic error. Please provide a sensitivity analysis using measured or typical probe S-parameters, or perform an on-wafer calibration at the probe tip, and bound the resulting uncertainty in the reported conversion los
  3. [§IV-A, Fig. 3] A frequency offset is observed between measured and simulated S11 peaks and troughs, attributed to unmodeled parasitic capacitive contributions in the transitions. This means the passive model is validated in amplitude only, not in the resonant frequencies that set the impedance seen by the photoconductor. Since the conversion-loss simulation uses the same electrical network, this offset could affect the predicted conversion loss and the operating-condition return loss. Please quantify the offset (e.g., as a percentage frequency error) and show that its impact on the simulated conversion loss is within the claimed ±1 dB, or add the missing parasitic transition elements to the model.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Table II] The conversion-loss range is given as 20–34 dB in Table II but as 22.5–25.5 dB below 320 GHz and 26–34 dB up to 500 GHz in the text and abstract. Please reconcile these numbers.
  2. [Table I and Fig. 7] Table I lists Cpc = 10.8 fF as the nominal model parameter, while Fig. 7 shows the best agreement at Cpc = 11.25 fF. Clarify that the former is the geometry-computed value used in the main simulations and that the latter is a consistency check, not the final extracted value.
  3. [Figures 3–4] The figure labels in the manuscript version contain garbled glyphs (/uni000000... sequences). Please ensure the final figures are rendered with readable axis labels and legends.
  4. [General] The Python simulation framework is described in some detail, but no code or data availability statement is given. Making the code available would strengthen the reproducibility of the circuit-model validation.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Conversion-loss 'prediction' uses a lifetime fitted to the same measured curve; passive validation is independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section IV-C, 'Conversion loss results'; also Abstract and Conclusion]
    "Instead of treating both as free fit parameters, the capacitance is fixed to the calculated value from the device geometry and only the lifetime is adjusted, keeping the extraction physically constrained. ... The best agreement is obtained for τ=0.8 ps."

    The abstract/conclusion claim that the model 'predicts' conversion loss within ±1 dB with τ≈0.8 ps is an in-sample fit: τ is the single parameter adjusted to maximize agreement with the same measured conversion-loss curve that defines the ±1 dB error. With τ chosen by best fit to those data, the agreement is not an independent out-of-sample prediction; it is a one-parameter fit to the target. The independent content (passive S-parameter validation, geometrical Cpc, measured Ron, measured τ lower bound) is real but does not turn the fitted τ into a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim — 'A parametric circuit model predicts the conversion loss of the full TMIC within ±1 dB ... with τ≈0.8 ps' — is partially circular because τ is explicitly adjusted to give best agreement with the same measured conversion-loss curve that is then quoted as the ±1 dB validation. This is the classic fitted-input-called-prediction pattern: the model is not independently predicting the data used to select its own parameter. The circularity is only partial, however. The dark-state S-parameter validation up to 500 GHz is independent of the conversion-loss fit; Cpc is fixed from geometry; Ron=240 Ω is a separately measured operating point; and the time-resolved τ≈0.5 ps measurement provides an independent lower bound for the sweep. The model does capture a nontrivial spectral shape across 1–500 GHz with a single scalar, so the result is not wholly tautological. I do not count the scalar probe de-embedding as circular: the paper explicitly acknowledges that probe impedance 'is expected to vary with frequency and is unlikely to remain purely real,' and while this may bias both measurement and simulation, it is a measurement-validity risk rather than a derivation that reduces to its own inputs. No load-bearing self-citation or uniqueness-importation circularity is present. Score 6 reflects the partial construction of the 'prediction' from the fitted lifetime, while recognizing the substantial independent validation elsewhere in the paper.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a standard photoconductance model, quasi-TEM CPW extraction, and a scalar probe de-embedding assumption. One parameter (tau) is fitted to the conversion-loss data; a parasitic inductance (Lp) is chosen to improve S21 agreement. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • tau (effective carrier lifetime) = 0.8 ps
    Adjusted in the 0.5-1.0 ps range for best agreement with measured conversion loss (Fig. 6). Lower bound from time-resolved photoreflectance; the CW-pumped value is not independently measured.
  • Lp (air-bridge inductance) = 1 pH
    Added to the model to improve |S21| agreement; value said to be consistent with air-bridge dimensions but not independently extracted.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Photoconductance follows G(t) = G0 [1 + sin(2π fLO t) / sqrt(1 + (2π fLO tau)^2)], with no higher harmonics or nonlinear IV effects.
    Invoked in Section II, Eq. (1), based on references [5],[12],[13]. The conversion-loss simulation depends on this sinusoidal time-varying conductance.
  • domain assumption The CPW sections are modeled by quasi-TEM transmission lines with propagation constants from [14] and lengths from layout, with no coupling or radiation effects.
    Used in Section II; the model agreement up to 500 GHz depends on this representation of the distributed embedding.
  • domain assumption Scalar de-embedding of RF/IF probe insertion loss is valid, assuming ideal 50-ohm matching at the probe tips.
    Stated in Section IV-B: only S21 magnitudes of probes are accounted for, justified by |S11|,|S22| < -15 dB. If violated, the conversion-loss values shift.
  • domain assumption The circuit topology can be represented by lumped elements and CPW line sections, with parasitic transition capacitances negligible.
    Section IV-A attributes the measured |S11| frequency offset to unmodeled parasitic capacitive contributions in transitions, so this simplification limits the dark-model validation.
  • standard math Carrier-lifetime phase delay affects only the phase of the downconverted signal, not its amplitude, and is omitted in Eq. (1).
    Section II, stated assumption; standard for this photomixer model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Circuit-Level Design, Modeling, and On-Wafer Characterization of a Coplanar THz Optoelectronic Mixer." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RRWC245Q

@misc{pith2026260803768,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Circuit-Level Design, Modeling, and On-Wafer Characterization of a Coplanar THz Optoelectronic Mixer},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RRWC245Q}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.03768}
}
read the original abstract

We report the design, modeling, and on-wafer characterization of a photoconductive heterodyne mixer implemented as a true terahertz monolithic integrated circuit (TMIC). Unlike previous photoconductive heterodyne demonstrations, the proposed circuit is characterized using RF integrated circuit metrics including input return loss, RF/IF isolation, broadband impedance matching, and conversion loss. The mixer combines a microcavity photoconductor with a broadband coplanar matching network incorporating a Ti shunt resistor, an RF DC-blocking MIM capacitor, and an RF/IF decoupling capacitor. A circuit-level model including both the photoconductor and the distributed CPW accesses is developed and validated. The passive circuit is experimentally characterized up to 500 GHz using on-wafer VNA measurements and accurately reproduced by simulation. Under illumination, the model predicts an input reflection coefficient below -10 dB up to 215 GHz and better than -6.5 dB up to 500 GHz. Measured and simulated conversion losses agree within +/-1 dB over the entire 1-500 GHz range. Conversion loss varies from 22.5-25.5 dB below 320 GHz and 26-34 dB up to 500 GHz. The proposed TMIC demonstrates broadband operation and provides a validated circuit design methodology for future integrated THz photonic mixers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.03768 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. TMIC topology. (a) Three-dimensional view of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. SEM top view of the fabricated mixer circuit. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Measured (symbols) and simulated (solid) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: On-wafer Conversion Loss measurement setup. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Measured conversion loss (symbols) versus sim [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Measured conversion loss (symbols) versus sim [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Matching penalty of the fabricated nominal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Matching penalty of the proposed series–shunt [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

20 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Generation and detection of coherent terahertz waves using two photomixers,

    S. Verghese, K. A. McIntosh, S. Calawa, W. F. Dinatale, E. K. Duerr, and K. A. Molvar, “Generation and detection of coherent terahertz waves using two photomixers,”Applied Physics Letters, vol. 73, no. 26, p. 3824, dec 1998

    work page 1998

  2. [2]

    Coherent broadband continuous- wave terahertz spectroscopy on solid-state samples,

    A. Roggenbuck, S. Schindler, B. Pradarutti, A. Deninger, F. Buersgens, and S. Preu, “Coherent broadband continuous- wave terahertz spectroscopy on solid-state samples,”New Jour- nal of Physics, vol. 12, p. 043017, 2010

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    2.75 THz tuning with a triple-DFB laser system at 1550 nm and InGaAs photomixers,

    A. J. Deninger, A. Roggenbuck, S. Schindler, and S. Preu, “2.75 THz tuning with a triple-DFB laser system at 1550 nm and InGaAs photomixers,”Journal of Infrared, Millimeter , and Terahertz Waves, vol. 36, pp. 269–277, 2015

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Photoconductive terahertz detectors with≥100 db dynamic range made by ErAs:In(Al)GaAs superlattice growth,

    R. B. Kohlhaas, S. Breuer, L. Liebermeister, S. Nellen, and M. Schell, “Photoconductive terahertz detectors with≥100 db dynamic range made by ErAs:In(Al)GaAs superlattice growth,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 114, p. 221103, 2019

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Highly efficient terahertz detection by optical mixing in a GaAs photoconductor,

    E. Peytavit, F. Pavanello, G. Ducournau, and J.-F. Lampin, “Highly efficient terahertz detection by optical mixing in a GaAs photoconductor,”Applied Physics Letters, vol. 103, no. 20, p. 201107, 2013

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    Photonic THz mixers based on iron-doped InGaAs embedded in a plasmonic microcavity,

    C. Tannoury, F. Pavanello, C. Coinon, S. Lepilliet, V . Avramovic, G. Ducournau, J.-F. Lampin, and E. Peytavit, “Photonic THz mixers based on iron-doped InGaAs embedded in a plasmonic microcavity,”APL Photonics, vol. 8, no. 11, p. 116101, 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Advancing terahertz photomixers through the integration of photoconduc- tive antennas with optical waveguides,

    M. Deumer, S. Nellen, S. Berrios, S. Breuer, S. Keyvaninia, L. Liebermeister, M. Schell, and R. B. Kohlhaas, “Advancing terahertz photomixers through the integration of photoconduc- tive antennas with optical waveguides,”APL Photonics, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 036105, 2025

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Ultra-broadband photonic receiver for (sub- )THz communication between 100 and 600 GHz enabling line rates up to 84 Gbit/s,

    M. Deumeret al., “Ultra-broadband photonic receiver for (sub- )THz communication between 100 and 600 GHz enabling line rates up to 84 Gbit/s,”IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology, 2025

    work page 2025

Show all 20 references
  1. [9]

    Subharmonic and fundamental mixers,

    Virginia Diodes, Inc., “Subharmonic and fundamental mixers,” 2026, product specifications, accessed May 2026. [Online]. Available: https://vadiodes.com/mixers-3/

    2026

  2. [10]

    Millimeter-wave optoelectronic mixers based on uni-traveling carrier photodiodes,

    E. Rouvalis, M. J. Fice, C. C. Renaud, and A. J. Seeds, “Millimeter-wave optoelectronic mixers based on uni-traveling carrier photodiodes,”IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 686–691, 2012

    2012

  3. [11]

    Photonically-driven Schottky diode based 0.3 THz heterodyne receiver,

    I. Belio-Apaolazaet al., “Photonically-driven Schottky diode based 0.3 THz heterodyne receiver,”Optics Express, vol. 30, no. 24, p. 43223, 2022

    2022

  4. [12]

    Mixing and Detection of Coherent Light,

    P. D. Coleman, R. C. Eden, and J. N. Weaver, “Mixing and Detection of Coherent Light,”IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. ED-11, no. 11, pp. 488–497, 1964

    1964

  5. [13]

    THz Photomix- ers,

    E. Peytavit, G. Ducournau, and J.-F. Lampin, “THz Photomix- ers,” inFundamentals of Terahertz Devices and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, jul 2021, pp. 137–186

    2021

  6. [14]

    Quasi-TEM description of MMIC coplanar lines including conductor-loss effects,

    W. Heinrich, “Quasi-TEM description of MMIC coplanar lines including conductor-loss effects,”IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 45–52,

  7. [15]

    The modified nodal approach to network analysis,

    C.-Y . Ho, A. E. Ruehli, and P. A. Brennan, “The modified nodal approach to network analysis,”IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 504–509, 1975

    1975

  8. [16]

    CW Source Based on Photomixing With Output Power Reaching 1.8 mW at 250 GHz,

    E. Peytavit, P. Latzel, F. Pavanello, G. Ducournau, and J.-F. Lampin, “CW Source Based on Photomixing With Output Power Reaching 1.8 mW at 250 GHz,”IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1277–1279, oct 2013. [Online]. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/ e...

    2013

  9. [17]

    Peytavit, S

    E. Peytavit, S. Lepilliet, F. Hindle, C. Coinon, T. Akalin, G. Ducournau, G. Mouret, and J.-F. Lampin, “Milliwatt-level output power in the sub-terahertz range generated by photomix- ISLAMet al.: CIRCUIT-LEVEL DESIGN, MODELING, AND ON-W AFER CHARACTERIZATION OF A COPLANAR THZ ...

    2011

  10. [18]

    Fringing fields in disc capacitors,

    G. J. Sloggett, N. G. Barton, and S. J. Spencer, “Fringing fields in disc capacitors,”Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, vol. 19, no. 14, pp. 2725–2736, 1986

    1986

  11. [19]

    A low-noise fixed- tuned 300–360 GHz sub-harmonic mixer using planar Schottky diodes,

    B. Thomas, A. Maestrini, and G. Beaudin, “A low-noise fixed- tuned 300–360 GHz sub-harmonic mixer using planar Schottky diodes,”IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 865–867, 2005

    2005

  12. [1993]

    Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/ 210228/

    [Online]. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/ 210228/

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.