Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

User Intent Recognition and Satisfaction with Large Language Models: A User Study with ChatGPT

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.02136 v2 pith:RTI7DFNO submitted 2024-02-03 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords usergpt-3intentgpt-4intent-basedintentsmodelsreformulations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rapid evolution of LLMs represents an impactful paradigm shift in digital interaction and content engagement. While they encode vast amounts of human-generated knowledge and excel in processing diverse data types, they often face the challenge of accurately responding to specific user intents, leading to user dissatisfaction. Based on a fine-grained intent taxonomy and intent-based prompt reformulations, we analyze the quality of intent recognition and user satisfaction with answers from intent-based prompt reformulations of GPT-3.5 Turbo and GPT-4 Turbo models. Our study highlights the importance of human-AI interaction and underscores the need for interdisciplinary approaches to improve conversational AI systems. We show that GPT-4 outperforms GPT-3.5 in recognizing common intents but is often outperformed by GPT-3.5 in recognizing less frequent intents. Moreover, whenever the user intent is correctly recognized, while users are more satisfied with the intent-based reformulations of GPT-4 compared to GPT-3.5, they tend to be more satisfied with the models' answers to their original prompts compared to the reformulated ones. The collected data from our study has been made publicly available on GitHub (https://github.com/ConcealedIDentity/UserIntentStudy) for further research.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Training LLMs with Reinforcement Learning for Intent-Aware Personalized Question Answering

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    IAP uses RL to train LLMs to explicitly infer and apply implicit user intent in single-turn personalized QA, achieving ~7.5% average macro-score gains over baselines on LaMP-QA.

  2. Context-KG: Context-Aware Knowledge Graph Visualization with User Preferences and Ontological Guidance

    cs.HC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Context-KG uses LLMs to extract user preferences and context from natural language, driving ontology-guided layouts and insights for knowledge graph visualization that improve interpretability and task performance ove...

  3. Generative AI Practices, Literacy, and Divides: An Empirical Analysis in the Italian Context

    cs.CL 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Survey of Italian adults finds generative AI adoption and capital-enhancing uses stratified by education, age, tech familiarity, and gender, with AI training as key predictor of purposeful engagement.

Pith tools