Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Positivity: Identifiability and Estimability

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.05010 v1 pith:RVW3YSM7 submitted 2022-07-11 stat.ME

classification stat.ME
keywords positivityestimabilityidentifiabilityinferenceactionaddressalgorithmsassumption
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Positivity, the assumption that every unique combination of confounding variables that occurs in a population has a non-zero probability of an action, can be further delineated as deterministic positivity and stochastic positivity. Here, we revisit this distinction, examine its relation to nonparametric identifiability and estimability, and discuss how to address violations of positivity assumptions. Finally, we relate positivity to recent interest in machine learning, as well as the limitations of data-adaptive algorithms for causal inference. Positivity may often be overlooked, but it remains important for inference.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 4 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Decision-analytical models as causal models

    stat.ME 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Decision-analytical models used for cost-effectiveness are causal models whose total bias decomposes into model bias plus target bias from internal and external validity failures of their input parameters.

  2. Constructing g-computation estimators: two case studies in selection bias

    stat.ME 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    New g-computation estimators, expressed as stacked estimating equations, recover average causal effects under treatment-induced selection and under confounding plus selection bias when no single adjustment set exists.

  3. Treatment effect estimation by comparing observed and predicted outcomes: conditions for valid inference and practical illustration

    stat.ME 2025-11 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    Valid estimation of the ATT by comparing observed outcomes under a new treatment with model-based predicted outcomes under standard treatment requires transportability, conditional ignorability, consistency, positivit...

Pith tools