pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.03283 · v1 · pith:RW3JTPB5new · submitted 2026-06-02 · 📡 eess.AS · cs.SD

SpeakerCard-1M: An Evidence-Grounded Speaker Card Corpus for In-the-Wild Speaker Verification

classification 📡 eess.AS cs.SD
keywords speakerunderutterance-levellanguageverificationac-verifyaudiobaseline
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Modern speaker verification (SV) systems rely on speaker embeddings that are effective but difficult to interpret or query in natural language. Most existing speech-text corpora target controllable synthesis or utterance-level captioning, and provide limited speaker-level supervision for in-the-wild speaker recognition. This paper introduces SpeakerCard-1M, a bilingual speaker-centric resource for evidence-grounded SV, derived from VoxCeleb1/2 and CN-Celeb1/2, where the "-1M" suffix refers to the 1.78M utterance-level captions contained in the release. We adopt a tool-first, LLM-last approach: ten acoustic probes produce field-level evidence, the evidence is aggregated into speaker profiles under a schema that separates relatively stable traits from utterance-level states, and bilingual Speaker Cards are rendered by a constrained LLM that sees only the structured fields. The release includes 56.7K Speaker Card records over 10.2K speakers, 1.78M utterance-level captions, and speaker-ID-disjoint hard-negative triplets. We further define two SV-oriented cross-modal protocols, bidirectional Speaker-Text Retrieval (T2S-R / S2T-R) and Attribute-Conditioned Verification (AC-Verify), and compare a dual-encoder baseline against recent audio language models under a zero-shot forced-choice setting. Joint audio-text training increases VoxCeleb1-O EER by 0.31% absolute over the audio-only baseline. Under a style-symmetric LLM-generated counterfactual protocol, eight recent audio language models (7B-30B+ parameters, both open- and closed-source) score 49-77% on pitch-level AC-Verify under two-way forced choice, compared with 88.66% reached by our dual encoder.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.