REVIEW 1 cited by
Consistent estimation of the proportion of false nulls and FDR for adaptive multiple testing Normal means under weak dependence
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We consider multiple testing means of many dependent Normal random variables that do not necessarily follow a joint Normal distribution. Under weak dependence, we show the uniform consistency of proportion estimators that are constructed as solutions to Lebesgue-Stieltjes equations for the setting of a point, bounded and one-sided null, respectively, and characterize via the index of weak dependence the sparsest proportion these estimators can consistently estimate. On the other hand, under a principal correlation structure and employing a suitable definition of p-value for composite null hypotheses, we show that three key empirical processes induced by a single-step multiple testing procedure (MTP) satisfy the strong law of large numbers for testing each of the three types of nulls. Further, under this structure and for testing a point null and a one-sided null respectively, we construct an adaptive single-step MTP that employs a proportion estimator mentioned earlier, and show that the false discovery proportion of this procedure satisfies the weak law of large numbers and hence consistently estimates the false discovery rate of the procedure. In addition, we report some findings on the estimators of Jin and of Meinshausen and Rice of the proportion of false nulls in the critically and very sparse regimes under weak dependence and model misspecifications, respectively.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A grouped, selectively weighted false discovery rate procedure
sGBH selects groups of hypotheses of interest and applies weighted FDR control only to those groups, with conservativeness conditions and improved empirical power over GBH in sparse configurations.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.