Pith. sign in

REVIEW

How long does a lockdown need to be?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.11633 v1 pith:S25LTGF6 submitted 2020-04-24 q-bio.PE

classification q-bio.PE
keywords distancingsocialepidemiclockdownlongmeasuresstrategytime
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Social distancing, often in the form of lockdown, has been adopted by many countries as a way to contrast the spreading of COVID-19. We discuss the temporal aspects of social distancing in contrasting an epidemic diffusion. We argue that a strategy based uniquely on social distancing requires to maintain the relative measures for a very long time, while a more articulate strategy, which also uses early detection and prompt isolation, can be both more efficient on reducing the epidemic peak and allow to relax the social distancing measures after a much shorter time. We consider in more detail the situation in Italy, simulating the effect of different strategies through a recently introduced SIR-type epidemiological model. The short answer to the question in the title is: "it depends on what else you do".

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools