Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Anomalous and Anisotropic Nonlinear Susceptibility in the Proximate Kitaev Magnet $\alpha$-RuCl$_3$

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.01785 v1 pith:S2EQN5VU submitted 2021-06-03 cond-mat.str-el

classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords fieldbehaviorhighmagneticonlyorderresponsezero
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The leading order nonlinear (NL) susceptibility, $\chi_3$, in a paramagnet is negative and diverges as $T \rightarrow 0$. This divergence is destroyed when spins correlate and the NL response provides unique insights into magnetic order. Dimensionality, exchange interaction, and preponderance of quantum effects all imprint their signatures in the NL magnetic response. Here, we study the NL susceptibilities in the proximate Kitaev magnet $\alpha$-RuCl$_3$ which differs from the expected antiferromagnetic behavior. For $T< T_c$ = 7.5 K and field $B$ in the ab-plane, we obtain contrasting NL responses in low ($<$ 2 ${T}$) and high field regions. For low fields the NL behavior is dominated by a quadratic response (positive $\chi_2$), which shows a rapid rise below $T_c$. This large $\chi_2 >0$ implies a broken sublattice symmetry of magnetic order at low temperatures. Classical Monte Carlo (CMC) simulations in the standard ${K-H-\Gamma}$ model secure such a quadratic ${B}$ dependence of ${M}$, only for ${T}$ $\approx$ ${T}_c$ with ${\chi}_2$ being zero as ${T}$ $\rightarrow$ 0. It is also zero for all temperatures in exact diagonalization calculations. On the other hand, we find an exclusive cubic term (${\chi}_3$) describes the high field NL behavior well. ${\chi}_3$ is large and positive both below and above ${T}_c$ crossing zero only for ${T}$ $>$ 50 K. In contrast, for $B$~$\parallel$~c-axis, no separate low/high field behaviors is measured and only a much smaller ${\chi}_3$ is apparent.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools