Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 88 references

Partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms homotopic to the identity in dimension three

T0 review · 5 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A partially hyperbolic diffeomorphism homotopic to the identity on a closed 3-manifold is accessible whenever the fundamental group is not virtually solvable and every point is non-wandering.

desk verdict A serious and likely correct proof of the HHU ergodicity conjecture in the identity homotopy class for non-solvable 3-manifolds, but the Gromov-hyperbolicity step for branching foliations is asserted rather than proved. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.00405 v1 pith:S2UVWEUY submitted 2025-05-31 math.DS

Ziqiang Feng , Raúl Ures This is my paper
classification math.DS MSC 37A2537C8637D3057R30
keywords partialhyperbolicityaccessibilityergodicityfoliations3-manifoldshomotopyclassofidentitynon-wanderingsetGromovhyperbolicleaves
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms homotopic to the identity on closed 3-manifolds are accessible — any two points can be joined by a path made of stable and unstable arcs — provided the fundamental group is not virtually solvable (no finite-index solvable subgroup) and every point is non-wandering. The authors then combine this with earlier ergodicity criteria to show that a volume-preserving $C^r$ such diffeomorphism is a $K$-system, a strong form of ergodicity, unless there is an embedded 2-torus tangent to the stable-unstable distribution $E^s \oplus E^u$. This gives an affirmative answer to the Ergodicity Conjecture for partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms in dimension three, within the homotopy class of the identity. The proof runs through a geometric analysis of the invariant su-lamination and of the branching foliation along the center-stable direction, showing that any failure of accessibility would force a closed stable leaf or contradict the translation behavior of a good lift.

What carries the argument

The engine is the pair $(F^{su}, W^{cs}_\epsilon)$: $F^{su}$ is the minimal foliation obtained by collapsing the complementary I-bundle regions of the invariant su-lamination $\Lambda^{su}$, and $W^{cs}_\epsilon$ is a well-approximated foliation of the invariant branching foliation $W^{cs}$ tangent to $E^s \oplus E^c$. Both are uniform R-covered minimal foliations by non-compact Gromov hyperbolic leaves, meaning their lifted leaf spaces are lines, pairs of lifted leaves lie at bounded Hausdorff distance, and leaves behave coarsely like the hyperbolic plane; their intersection is a one-dimensional foliation $G = F^{su} \cap W^{cs}_\epsilon$. The argument tracks the ideal limit set of $G$ inside the Gromov boundaries, the ideal circles at infinity, of the leaves: a dense limit set combined with Hausdorff or non-Hausdorff leaf spaces forces a closed $G$-leaf, hence a closed stable leaf, which partial hyperbolicity forbids; a degenerate limit set makes the unstable foliation regulating and produces an invariant leaf for the good lift, contradicting the fact that the lift translates the leaf space. A supporting structural theorem says that suitable transverse minimal R-covered foliation pairs with Gromov hyperbolic leaves form the weak-stable and weak-unstable foliations of a transitive topological Anosov flow.

What would settle it

A counterexample would be a $C^1$ partially hyperbolic diffeomorphism homotopic to the identity on a closed 3-manifold with non-virtually solvable fundamental group and $NW(f)=M$ that has two points not joined by any stable-unstable path; the structure theory would then produce an invariant su-lamination, and one could check directly whether its lifted leaves are uniformly Gromov hyperbolic as Theorem 8.6 asserts.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.3: a $C^1$ partially hyperbolic diffeomorphism homotopic to the identity on a closed 3-manifold is accessible whenever the fundamental group is not virtually solvable and $NW(f)=M$. Accessibility means that the stable and unstable foliations together connect any two points. From this, the paper derives Theorem 1.2: a $C^r$ conservative (volume-preserving) such diffeomorphism is a $K$-system, and hence ergodic, unless it admits an embedded 2-torus tangent to $E^s \oplus E^u$. The proof treats the non-accessible case as a rigid geometric configuration: the structure theory of non-accessible diffeomorphisms produces a minimal invariant lamination tangent to $E^s \oplus E^u$; collapsing its complementary I-bundle regions turns it into a uniform R-covered minimal foliation with Gromov hyperbolic leaves; intersecting that foliation with a well-approximated center-stable branching foliation yields a one-dimensional intersection foliation whose ideal-boundary behavior gives the contradictions that prove accessibility.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the uniformization theorem for surface laminations applies to the $C^1$ branching foliation and to the collapsed su-lamination, so all their leaves are uniformly Gromov hyperbolic; if that uniformity fails at branching or collapse points, the ideal-boundary and Anosov-flow constructions in the proof do not get off the ground.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Theorem 1.2: every $C^r$ conservative partially hyperbolic diffeomorphism homotopic to the identity on a closed 3-manifold is a $K$-system unless an embedded 2-torus tangent to $E^s \oplus E^u$ exists.
  • Corollary 1.4: under the same $C^1$ hypotheses, the diffeomorphism is transitive.
  • Theorem 1.5: for $C^r$ conservative such diffeomorphisms, transitivity and ergodicity are equivalent.
  • Corollary 1.6: if $NW(f)=M$ or $f$ is dynamically coherent, and no iterate is a discretized suspension Anosov flow, then $f$ is accessible; if it is $C^r$ and conservative, it is a $K$-system.
  • The non-accessible case is confined to manifolds with virtually solvable fundamental group, so the obstruction to ergodicity in this homotopy class is purely algebraic.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The authors leave implicit that the technical Theorem 1.7 is a purely foliation-theoretic statement: two transverse minimal R-covered foliations with Gromov hyperbolic leaves and suitable intersection behavior always carry a transitive topological Anosov flow, so the same machinery may apply to classification problems outside partial hyperbolicity.
  • The proof uses unpublished results on non-separated leaves of transverse foliations; if those results require additional hypotheses, the affected step would need a replacement, while the overall dichotomy strategy might survive.
  • A natural testable extension is to drop the non-wandering assumption: related work on systems without periodic points suggests accessibility may hold in broader identity-homotopy classes, and the current proof indicates where such a generalization would have to intervene.
  • The $C^1$ accessibility result combined with the $C^r$ ergodicity criterion suggests that regularity of the measure, not accessibility, is what separates accessibility from ergodicity in this setting.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper claims to prove that a C^1 partially hyperbolic diffeomorphism homotopic to the identity on a closed 3-manifold with non-virtually-solvable fundamental group and NW(f)=M is accessible (Theorem 1.3). Combining this with known results [HHU08a, BW10] yields ergodicity for Cr conservative such diffeomorphisms unless there is an embedded 2-torus tangent to Es⊕Eu (Theorem 1.2), giving a positive answer to the Hertz-Hertz-Ures Ergodicity Conjecture in the homotopy class of the identity. The proof reduces the problem to a study of two transverse R-covered foliations with Gromov hyperbolic leaves, their intersection foliation, and the structure of ideal boundaries. It introduces a number of intermediate results (Propositions 4.2, 4.3, 5.1, 5.7, 6.3, 7.1, Theorem 6.1) which are then applied in Section 8 to the su-lamination and the center-stable branching foliation.

Significance. If the main theorem is correct, this is a major advance: it settles the HHU Ergodicity Conjecture for the whole homotopy class of the identity, a class that includes the difficult cases of non-dynamically-coherent systems and non-periodic-point-free settings. The geometric machinery developed in Sections 3-7 is of independent interest, especially Theorem 1.7 on constructing a topological Anosov flow from a pair of transverse foliations. The paper is also notable for its ambition in removing geometric restrictions on the ambient manifold. However, the proof's reliance on a black-box extension of Candel's uniformization theorem to branching foliations and on several unpublished results [BFP25, FU24] means that the contribution is conditional on those external ingredients being fully supplied.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 8.3, Remark 8.7 and Proposition 8.9]
  2. [Section 8.4]
  3. [Theorems 7.1 and Lemma 6.6]
  4. [Section 4.2, Proposition 4.3 and Corollary 4.4]
  5. [Section 8.4, dense-limit-set case]
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 5.3, Proposition 5.7]
  2. [Section 6.3, proof of Theorem 6.1]
  3. [Throughout]
  4. [Theorem 7.1]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central accessibility proof does not assume its conclusion, though it leans on prior and unpublished work by the same and other authors.

full rationale

I find no step of the derivation chain that reduces to its own inputs. Theorem 1.3 is obtained by contradiction from external structural results: Theorem 2.3 [HHU08b] reduces non-accessibility to an su-lamination, Theorem 8.6 and Proposition 8.9 import Gromov hyperbolicity from [FP22, BFP23], and Theorem 8.8 imports the R-covered uniform alternative from [BI08, HHU11, BFFP23]. The authors' own [FU24] is used only to produce a periodic point in the foliation case ('If Λsu is a minimal foliation, then f also admits a periodic point as an immediate corollary of [FU24, Theorem 1.4]', Section 8.1), and the unpublished [BFP25] is used for transverse-intersection and non-separated-leaf facts in Sections 6-7; neither of those results states or presupposes the accessibility conclusion of Theorem 1.3. The main geometric Sections 3-7 are developed in this paper from the stated hypotheses (transverse minimal R-covered foliations with non-compact Gromov hyperbolic leaves) and are applied to Wcs_epsilon and Λsu after the hyperbolicity facts are cited. The weakest point is Remark 8.7, which asserts without proof that Candel's uniformization applies to C1 branching foliations and laminations via [Cal01]; a failure there would invalidate the application of Sections 3-7, but that is a missing proof, not a circular one, since the asserted extension is not derived from Theorem 1.3. There are no fitted parameters renamed as predictions and no equation that is identical to an input by construction. The score 2 reflects the load-bearing self-citations and the unpublished companion dependence, not circularity of the central claim.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters and no invented entities. The proof is a deduction from external structure theorems in partially hyperbolic dynamics and foliation theory. The most fragile import is the extension of Candel's uniformization to non-smooth branching foliations (Remark 8.7), together with reliance on unpublished preprints [BFP25, FP23a, FP23b, Fen24].

assumptions (7)
  • standard math Unique integrability of the strong stable and unstable bundles (Theorem 2.1, citing [BP74, HPS77])
    Defines the stable and unstable foliations used to define accessibility and the su-lamination.
  • domain assumption HHU structure theorem for non-accessible partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms (Theorem 2.3, [HHU08b])
    Provides the invariant lamination or foliation tangent to Es⊕Eu that the contradiction argument starts from.
  • domain assumption Classification of invariant tori tangent to Es⊕Eu, Ec⊕Eu, Es⊕Ec (Theorem 2.2, [HHU11])
    Used to rule out compact leaves under non-virtually-solvable fundamental group.
  • domain assumption Candel's uniformization theorem and its extension to surface laminations (Remark 8.7, [Can93, Cal01])
    Gives uniform Gromov hyperbolicity of leaves of Λsu and W^cs; the lynchpin of the ideal-boundary machinery.
  • domain assumption FP22 Corollary 5.8: leaves of Λsu are uniformly Gromov hyperbolic
    Imports the main geometric input for the su-lamination in the non-accessible case.
  • domain assumption BFFP23/FP22 Theorem 8.8: W^cs is R-covered, uniform, and the good lift translates, unless an iterate is a discretized Anosov flow
    Supplies the second transverse foliation F2 = W^cs_epsilon and controls the action of the good lift; the discretized-Anosov case is handled by [FP22, Theorem C].
  • domain assumption Results of [BFP25] on transverse minimal R-covered foliations and non-separated leaves
    Used in Lemma 6.6 and Theorem 7.1 to swap the roles of F1 and F2; only available as a 2025 preprint.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms homotopic to the identity in dimension three." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/S2UVWEUY

@misc{pith2026250600405,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms homotopic to the identity in dimension three},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/S2UVWEUY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.00405}
}
read the original abstract

We show that any conservative partially hyperbolic diffeomorphism homotopic to the identity is accessible unless the fundamental group of its ambient 3-manifold is virtually solvable. As a consequence, such diffeomorphisms are ergodic, giving an affirmative answer to the Hertz-Hertz-Ures Ergodicity Conjecture in the homotopy class of identity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.00405 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The shadows of the curve sn and its associated geodesic visual measure of the shadow Ix,r0 at x. Changing the choice of y if necessary, we can assume that y is on the boundary of the wedge Wx(Ix,r0 ) and θ ∈ (0, π). Let d := dL0 (x, y) be the distance of x and y in the leaf L0, which is finite. Denote by T(x, a) a transversal to the foliation Fe1, containing x in the interior and having length a > 0, that is contain… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Bounded distance from geodesics to curves under transverse continuity that for any n ≥ Nω, we have |Vx(I i ) − Vxn (I i n )| ≤ ω for i = 1, 2. It turns out that for any n ≥ Nω, we have |Vxn (Ixn,rn ) − Vx(Ix,r0 )| ≤ 3ω, since the ideal point l(yn) + is bounded by η 1 n and η 2 n . As the wedge Wxn (I c xn,sn ) converges to the geodesic ray α which has the ideal point ξ, there is N′ ω ∈ N such that for any n ≥ N′ ω ,… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The leaf l0 has two ideal points distinct from ξ We claim that there are other leaves in L0 ∩ E distinct from l0 accumulated by ln. Indeed, if ln converges to a single leaf l0, then the ideal points l ± n converge to l ± 0 . Otherwise, by Proposition 3.8, there is at least one leaf non-separated from l0 in E accumualted by ln. Using Proposition 3.2, this leaf is also contained in L0, which implies the claim. Now, th… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The leaf en is contained in the half plane disjoint with l0 bounded by e0 Denote by A the collection of leaves in H − l0 non-separated from l0 and B the collection of leaves in H + l0 non-separated from l0. By Proposition 3.2, we know that all leaves in E non-separated…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The leaf Ln contains a leaf en with a single ideal point distinct from ξ contains the disk D(γn(pn), n) in Ln. Then the leaf ln either escapes from Rn through γn(l ∗ ) or converges to γn(l∞). By the argument above, the leaf ln converges to several leaves non-separated …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Two possibilities in each half plane: either every leaf has a single ideal point contained in {l + 0 , l− 0 }, or there is a unique leaf bounding a new half plane with the same ideal points H− s−1 ⊂ H − l0 non-separated from s−1. Analogously, we also have two possibili…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Avila, S

    A. Avila, S. Crovisier, and A. Wilkinson. C^1 density of stable ergodicity. Advances in Mathematics , 379:107496, 2021

    2021

  2. [2]

    T. Adachi. Closed orbits of an A nosov flow and the fundamental group. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 100(3):595--598, 1987

    1987

  3. [3]

    D. V. Anosov. Geodesic flows on closed riemannian manifolds of negative curvature. Trudy Matematicheskogo Instituta Imeni VA Steklova , 90:3--210, 1967

    1967

  4. [4]

    V. Arnold. Small denominators, I : mappings of the circumference into itself. AMS Trans. Series 2 , 46:213, 1965

    1965

  5. [5]

    D. V. Anosov and Ja. G. Sinai. Certain smooth ergodic systems. Uspehi Mat. Nauk , 22(5(137)):107--172, 1967

    1967

  6. [6]

    Avila and M

    A. Avila and M. Viana. Stable accessibility with 2-dimensional center. Ast\'erisque , (416):301--320, 2020. Some aspects of the theory of dynamical systems: a tribute to Jean-Christophe Yoccoz. Vol. II

    2020

  7. [7]

    Avila, M

    A. Avila, M. Viana, and A. Wilkinson. Absolute continuity, L yapunov exponents and rigidity I : geodesic flows. Journal of the European Mathematical Society (JEMS) , 17(6):1435--1462, 2015

    2015

  8. [8]

    Burns, D

    K. Burns, D. Dolgopyat, and Ya. Pesin. Partial hyperbolicity, L yapunov exponents and stable ergodicity. Journal of Statistical Physics , 108(5-6):927--942, 2002. Dedicated to David Ruelle and Yasha Sinai on the occasion of their 65th birthdays

    2002

Show all 88 references
  1. [9]

    Barthelm\'e, S

    T. Barthelm\'e, S. R. Fenley, S. Frankel, and R. Potrie. Partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms homotopic to the identity in dimension 3, II : B ranching foliations. Geometry & Topology , 27(8):3095--3181, 2023

    2023

  2. [10]

    Barthelm\'e, S

    T. Barthelm\'e, S. R. Fenley, S. Frankel, and R. Potrie. Partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms homotopic to the identity in dimension 3, P art I : T he dynamically coherent case. Annales Scientifiques de l'\'Ecole Normale Sup\'erieure. Quatri\`eme S\'erie , 57(2):293--349, 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    Barthelm\'e, S

    T. Barthelm\'e, S. R. Fenley, and R. Potrie. Collapsed A nosov flows and self orbit equivalences. Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici , 98(4):771--875, 2023

    2023

  4. [12]

    Barbot, S

    T. Barbot, S. R. Fenley, and R. Potrie. On transverse R -covered minimal foliations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.14489 , 2025

    2025 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Bonatti, A

    C. Bonatti, A. Gogolev, A. Hammerlindl, and R. Potrie. Anomalous partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms III : abundance and incoherence. Geometry & Topology , 24(4):1751--1790, 2020

    2020

  6. [14]

    Bridson and A

    M. Bridson and A. Haefliger. Metric spaces of non-positive curvature , volume 319. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

    2013

  7. [15]

    Burago and S

    D. Burago and S. Ivanov. Partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms of 3-manifolds with abelian fundamental groups. Journal of Modern Dynamics , 2(4):541, 2008

    2008

  8. [16]

    G. D. Birkhoff. Proof of the ergodic theorem. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 17(12):656--660, 1931

    1931

  9. [17]

    G. D. Birkhoff and B. O. Koopman. Recent contributions to the ergodic theory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 18(3):279--282, 1932

    1932

  10. [18]

    Barthelm\'e and K

    T. Barthelm\'e and K. Mann. Orbit equivalences of R -covered A nosov flows and hyperbolic-like actions on the line. Geometry & Topology , 28(2):867--899, 2024. Appendix written jointly with Jonathan Bowden

    2024

  11. [19]

    M. I. Brin and Ja. B. Pesin. Partially hyperbolic dynamical systems. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. , 38:170--212, 1974

    1974

  12. [20]

    Burns, C

    K. Burns, C. Pugh, and A. Wilkinson. Stable ergodicity and A nosov flows. Topology , 39(1):149--159, 2000

    2000

  13. [21]

    M. Brin. Topological transitivity of one class of dynamic systems and flows of frames on manifolds of negative curvature. Functional Analysis and Its Applications , 9(1):8--16, 1975

    1975

  14. [22]

    Bonatti and A

    C. Bonatti and A. Wilkinson. Transitive partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms on 3-manifolds. Topology , 44(3):475--508, 2005

    2005

  15. [23]

    Burns and A

    K. Burns and A. Wilkinson. Dynamical coherence and center bunching. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems , 22(1-2):89--100, 2008

    2008

  16. [24]

    Burns and A

    K. Burns and A. Wilkinson. On the ergodicity of partially hyperbolic systems. Annals of Mathematics. Second Series , 171(1):451--489, 2010

    2010

  17. [25]

    Calegari

    D. Calegari. The geometry of R -covered foliations. Geometry & Topology , 4(1):457--515, 2000

    2000

  18. [26]

    Calegari

    D. Calegari. Leafwise smoothing laminations. Algebraic & Geometric Topology , 1(1):579--587, 2001

    2001

  19. [27]

    Calegari

    D. Calegari. Promoting essential laminations. Inventiones Mathematicae , 166(3):583--643, 2006

    2006

  20. [28]

    Calegari

    D. Calegari. Foliations and the geometry of 3-manifolds . Oxford Mathematical Monographs. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007

    2007

  21. [29]

    A. Candel. Uniformization of surface laminations. Annales scientifiques de l'Ecole normale sup \'e rieure , 26(4):489--516, 1993

    1993

  22. [30]

    Candel and L

    A. Candel and L. Conlon. Foliations. I , volume 23 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2000

    2000

  23. [31]

    Carrasco, F

    P. Carrasco, F. R. Hertz, J. R. Hertz, and R. Ures. Partially hyperbolic dynamics in dimension three. Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , 38(8):2801--2837, 2018

    2018

  24. [32]

    Invariance principle and non-compact center foliations

    Sylvain Crovisier and Mauricio Poletti. Invariance principle and non-compact center foliations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.14989 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    L. J. D\'iaz, E. R. Pujals, and R. Ures. Partial hyperbolicity and robust transitivity. Acta Mathematica , 183(1):1--43, 1999

    1999

  26. [34]

    Dolgopyat and A

    D. Dolgopyat and A. Wilkinson. Stable accessibility is C^1 dense. Ast\'erisque , (287):xvii, 33--60, 2003. Geometric methods in dynamics. II

    2003

  27. [35]

    S. R. Fenley. Quasi-isometric foliations. Topology , 31(3):667--676, 1992

    1992

  28. [36]

    S. R. Fenley. Anosov flows in 3 -manifolds. Annals of Mathematics. Second Series , 139(1):79--115, 1994

    1994

  29. [37]

    S. R. Fenley. Foliations, topology and geometry of 3-manifolds: R-covered foliations and transverse pseudo-anosov flows. Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici , 77(3):415--490, 2002

    2002

  30. [38]

    Z. Feng. Partially hyperbolic dynamics with quasi-isometric center. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.11836 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    S. R. Fenley and R. Potrie. Minimality of the action on the universal circle of uniform foliations. Groups, Geometry, and Dynamics , 15(4):1489--1521, 2021

    2021

  32. [40]

    S. R. Fenley and R. Potrie. Ergodicity of partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms in hyperbolic 3-manifolds. Advances in Mathematics , 401:108315, 2022

    2022

  33. [41]

    S. R. Fenley and R. Potrie. Intersection of transverse foliations in 3-manifolds: Hausdorff leafspace implies leafwise quasi-geodesic. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.05176 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    S. R. Fenley and R. Potrie. Transverse minimal foliations on unit tangent bundles and applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.14525 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  35. [43]

    S. R. Fenley and R. Potrie. Accessibility and ergodicity for collapsed A nosov flows. American Journal of Mathematics , 146(5):1339--1359, 2024

    2024

  36. [44]

    S. R. Fenley and R. Potrie. Partial hyperbolicity and pseudo- A nosov dynamics. Geometric and Functional Analysis , 34(2):409--485, 2024

    2024

  37. [45]

    Feng and R

    Z. Feng and R. Ures. Accessibility and central integrability in the absence of periodic points. In preparation

  38. [46]

    Feng and R

    Z. Feng and R. Ures. Accessibility and ergodicity of partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms without periodic points. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07062 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    D. Gabai. Foliations and 3-manifolds. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians , volume 1, pages 609--619, 1990

    1990

  40. [48]

    Gabai and U Oertel

    D. Gabai and U Oertel. Essential laminations in 3-manifolds. Annals of Mathematics , 130(1):41--73, 1989

    1989

  41. [49]

    Grayson, C

    M. Grayson, C. Pugh, and M. Shub. Stably ergodic diffeomorphisms. Annals of Mathematics , 140(2):295--329, 1994

    1994

  42. [50]

    M. Gromov. Hyperbolic groups. In Essays in group theory , volume 8 of Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ. , pages 75--263. Springer, New York, 1987

    1987

  43. [51]

    Gan and Y

    S. Gan and Y. Shi. Rigidity of center lyapunov exponents and su -integrability. Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici , 95(3):569--592, 2020

    2020

  44. [52]

    Hammerlindl

    A. Hammerlindl. Ergodic components of partially hyperbolic systems. Comment. Math. Helv , 92:131--184, 2017

    2017

  45. [53]

    F. R. Hertz. Stable ergodicity of certain linear automorphisms of the torus. Annals of Mathematics. Second Series , 162(1):65--107, 2005

    2005

  46. [54]

    Hector and U

    G. Hector and U. Hirsch. Introduction to the Geometry of Foliations, Part B . Springer, 1987

    1987

  47. [55]

    F. R. Hertz, M. R. Hertz, A. Tahzibi, and R. Ures. New criteria for ergodicity and nonuniform hyperbolicity. Duke Mathematical Journal , 160(3):599--629, 2011

    2011

  48. [56]

    F. R. Hertz, M. R. Hertz, A. Tahzibi, and R. Ures. Maximizing measures for partially hyperbolic systems with compact center leaves. Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , 32(2):825--839, 2012

    2012

  49. [57]

    F. R. Hertz, M. R. Hertz, and R. Ures. Accessibility and stable ergodicity for partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms with 1d-center bundle. Inventiones mathematicae , 2(172):353--381, 2008

    2008

  50. [58]

    F. R. Hertz, M. R. Hertz, and R. Ures. Partial hyperbolicity and ergodicity in dimension three. Journal of Modern Dynamics , 2(2):187--208, 2008

    2008

  51. [59]

    F. R. Hertz, J. R. Hertz, and R. Ures. Tori with hyperbolic dynamics in 3-manifolds. Journal of Modern Dynamics , 5(1):185--202, 2011

    2011

  52. [60]

    F. R. Hertz, J. R. Hertz, and R. Ures. A non-dynamically coherent example on t3. Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré C, Analyse non linéaire , 33(4):1023--1032, 2016

    2016

  53. [61]

    Hammerlindl, J

    A. Hammerlindl, J. R. Hertz, and R. Ures. Ergodicity and partial hyperbolicity on S eifert manifolds. J. Mod. Dyn. , 16:331--348, 2020

    2020

  54. [62]

    atischen L inien in M annigfaltigkeiten negativer K r\

    E. Hopf. Statistik der geod\"atischen L inien in M annigfaltigkeiten negativer K r\"ummung. Ber. Verh. S\"achs. Akad. Wiss. Leipzig Math.-Phys. Kl. , 91:261--304, 1939

    1939

  55. [63]

    Hammerlindl and R

    A. Hammerlindl and R. Potrie. Classification of partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms in 3-manifolds with solvable fundamental group. Journal of Topology , 8(3):842--870, 2015

    2015

  56. [64]

    Hirsch, C Pugh, and M Shub

    M. Hirsch, C Pugh, and M Shub. Invariant manifolds. Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 583. , 1977

    1977

  57. [65]

    Hammerlindl and Y

    A. Hammerlindl and Y. Shi. Accessibility of derived-from-anosov systems. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , 374(4):2949--2966, 2021

    2021

  58. [66]

    Hammerlindl and R

    A. Hammerlindl and R. Ures. Ergodicity and partial hyperbolicity on the 3-torus. Communications in Contemporary Mathematics , 16(04):1350038, 22pp, 2014

    2014

  59. [67]

    Inaba and S

    T. Inaba and S. Matsumoto. Nonsingular expansive flows on 3 -manifolds and foliations with circle prong singularities. Japanese Journal of Mathematics. New Series , 16(2):329--340, 1990

    1990

  60. [68]

    Kolmogorov

    A. Kolmogorov. On the conservation of conditionally periodic motions under small perturbation of the hamiltonian. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSR , 98(527):2--3, 1954

    1954

  61. [69]

    Global stability of discretized A nosov flows

    Santiago Martinchich. Global stability of discretized A nosov flows. Journal of Modern Dynamics , 19:561--623, 2023

    2023

  62. [70]

    P. Mendes. On anosov diffeomorphisms on the plane. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society , 63(2):231--235, 1977

    1977

  63. [71]

    E. E. Moise. Geometric topology in dimensions 2 and 3 , volume Vol. 47 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics . Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg, 1977

    1977

  64. [72]

    J. Moser. On invariant curves of area-preserving mappings of an annulus. Nachr. Akad. Wiss. G\"ottingen Math.-Phys. Kl. II , 1962:1--20, 1962

    1962

  65. [73]

    J. v. Neumann. Proof of the quasi-ergodic hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 18(1):70--82, 1932

    1932

  66. [74]

    Ni tic a and A

    V. Ni tic a and A. T\"or\"ok. An open dense set of stably ergodic diffeomorphisms in a neighborhood of a non-ergodic one. Topology , 40(2):259--278, 2001

    2001

  67. [75]

    J. C. Oxtoby and S. M. Ulam. Measure-preserving homeomorphisms and metrical transitivity. Annals of Mathematics. Second Series , 42:874--920, 1941

    1941

  68. [76]

    C. F. Palmeira. Open manifolds foliated by planes. Annals of Mathematics , 107(1):109--131, 1978

    1978

  69. [77]

    K. Parwani. On 3-manifolds that support partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms. Nonlinearity , 23(3):589--606, 2010

    2010

  70. [78]

    Paternain

    M. Paternain. Expansive flows and the fundamental group. Boletim da Sociedade Brasileira de Matem\'atica. Nova S\'erie , 24(2):179--199, 1993

    1993

  71. [79]

    Pugh and M

    C. Pugh and M. Shub. Ergodicity of A nosov actions. Inventiones Mathematicae , 15:1--23, 1972

    1972

  72. [80]

    Rosenberg

    H. Rosenberg. Foliations by planes. Topology , 7(2):131--138, 1968

    1968

  73. [81]

    Roussarie

    R. Roussarie. Sur les feuilletages des vari \'e t \'e s de dimension trois. Annales de l'institut Fourier , 21(3):13--82, 1971

    1971

  74. [82]

    M. Shannon. Hyperbolic models for transitive topological anosov flows in dimension three. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.12000 , 2021

    2021 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Thurston

    W. Thurston. On the geometry and dynamics of diffeomorphisms of surfaces. Bulletin of the American mathematical society , 19(2):417--431, 1988

    1988

  76. [84]

    Thurston

    W. Thurston. Three-manifolds, foliations and circles, I . arXiv preprint arXiv:math/9712268 , 1997

    1997 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Viana and J

    M. Viana and J. Yang. Physical measures and absolute continuity for one-dimensional center direction. Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincar\'e C. Analyse Non Lin\'eaire , 30(5):845--877, 2013

    2013

  78. [86]

    Wilkinson

    A. Wilkinson. Stable ergodicity of the time-one map of a geodesic flow. Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , 18(6):1545--1587, 1998

    1998

  79. [87]

    Wilkinson

    A. Wilkinson. Conservative partially hyperbolic dynamics. In Proceedings of the I nternational C ongress of M athematicians. V olume III , pages 1816--1836. Hindustan Book Agency, New Delhi, 2010

    2010

  80. [88]

    Wilkinson

    A. Wilkinson. The cohomological equation for partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms. Ast\'erisque , (358):75--165, 2013

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.