Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Age-at-harvest models as monitoring and harvest management tools for Wisconsin carnivores

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.06417 v1 pith:S3PWS6S7 submitted 2018-11-15 q-bio.PE

classification q-bio.PE
keywords harvestbobcatspopulationblackdatamodelspopulationswisconsin
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Quantifying and estimating wildlife population sizes is a foundation of wildlife management. However, many carnivore species are cryptic, leading to innate difficulties in estimating their populations. We evaluated the potential for using more rigorous statistical models to estimate the populations of black bears (Ursus americanus) in Wisconisin, and their applicability to other furbearers such as bobcats (Lynx rufus). To estimate black bear populations, we developed an AAH state-space model in a Bayesian framework based on Norton (2015) that can account for variation in harvest and population demographics over time. Our state-space model created an accurate estimate of the black bear population in Wisconsin based on age-at-harvest data and improves on previous models by using little demographic data, no auxiliary data, and not being sensitive to initial population size. The increased accuracy of the AAH state-space models should allow for better management by being able to set accurate quotas to ensure a sustainable harvest for the black bear population in each zone. We also evaluated the demography and annual harvest data of bobcats in Wisconsin to determine trends in harvest, method, and hunter participation in Wisconsin. Each trait of harvested bobcats that we tested (mass, male:female sex ratio, and age) changed over time, and because these were interrelated, and we inferred that harvest selection for larger size biased harvests in favor of a) larger, b) older, and c) male bobcats by hound hunters. We also found an increase in the proportion of bobcats that were harvested by hound hunting compared to trapping, and that hound hunters were more likely to create taxidermy mounts than trappers. We also found that decreasing available bobcat tags and increasing success have occurred over time, and correlate with substantially increasing both hunter populations and hunter interest.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools