pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.02499 · v1 · pith:S3UHI4LKnew · submitted 2026-06-01 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

Evaluating Cepheid Metallicity Effect Determinations via IC1613 and Gaia-independent Parallaxes

Daniel Majaess This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 12:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR
keywords Cepheidsmetallicity correctionIC1613TRGBHST parallaxesWesenheit magnitudedistance modulus
0
0 comments X

The pith

Larger Cepheid metallicity corrections of -0.25 and -0.50 mag dex^{-1} are disfavored by IC1613 TRGB distances.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives a Gaia-independent distance to IC1613 from 18 HST parallaxes of Galactic Cepheids and tests three proposed metallicity corrections in the Wesenheit magnitude. A correction of zero produces a distance modulus of 24.39 that matches the weighted mean of independent TRGB and TRGB/JAGB measurements. Corrections of -0.25 and -0.50 instead yield 24.16 and 23.93, which fall outside the TRGB range. The analysis therefore disfavors the larger corrections while noting that a broader metallicity baseline would be needed to test smaller effects.

Core claim

Using HST parallaxes rather than Gaia to calibrate Cepheids, the implied IC1613 distance modulus is 24.39 for γ(W_VI) = 0, 24.16 for γ(W_VI) = -0.25, and 23.93 for γ(W_VI) = -0.50; the two larger corrections are inconsistent with the TRGB mean of 24.39^{+0.07}_{-0.04} (EDD) and 24.36±0.06 / 24.45±0.11 (CCHP).

What carries the argument

The metallicity correction γ(W_VI) applied to the Wesenheit magnitude W_VI when converting apparent to absolute magnitudes for Cepheids in IC1613.

If this is right

  • Zero correction produces a distance modulus matching the TRGB mean of 24.39.
  • Corrections of -0.25 and -0.50 produce shorter distances that disagree with TRGB results.
  • A wider metallicity range is required to test corrections smaller than -0.1 mag dex^{-1}.
  • Additional non-Gaia parallaxes are needed because of existing concerns with DR3 for long-period Cepheids.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same HST-parallax approach could be applied to other nearby galaxies that have independent TRGB distances to further constrain γ(W_VI).
  • If smaller corrections ultimately prove necessary, they would shift the zero-point of the Cepheid distance ladder used for Hubble constant work.
  • Publication of more HST or future-mission parallaxes for metal-poor Cepheids would directly address the paper's call for an expanded baseline.

Load-bearing premise

The TRGB and TRGB/JAGB distances to IC1613 reported by EDD and CCHP are accurate benchmarks that do not themselves incorporate Cepheid metallicity corrections.

What would settle it

A new independent distance measurement to IC1613 that falls near 24.16 or 23.93 would support the larger metallicity corrections.

read the original abstract

18 HST parallaxes for Galactic classical Cepheids are unified to establish a Gaia-independent IC1613 distance and evaluate metallicity effect determinations, since the Gaia zeropoint is debated. Recently proposed classical Cepheid metallicity corrections of $\gamma (W_{VI}) \simeq 0, -0.25, -0.50$ mag dex$^{-1}$ are benchmarked, and yield $\mu_{0,{W_{VI}}} \simeq 24.39, 24.16, 23.93$ ($\pm0.07$). Larger corrections are disfavored relative to a weighted mean of IC1613 TRGB and TRGB/JAGB distances of $24.39^{+0.07}_{-0.04}$ (EDD) and $24.36\pm0.06$/$24.45\pm0.11$ (CCHP). A more expansive metallicity baseline is desirable to scrutinize smaller corrections (e.g., $\gamma (W_{VI}) \lesssim -0.1$ mag dex$^{-1}$), while concurrently acquiring additional non-Gaia parallaxes since published concerns exist regarding DR3 (e.g., critical long-period Cepheids S Vul, SV Vul).

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper unifies 18 HST parallaxes of Galactic classical Cepheids to derive a Gaia-independent distance to IC1613 and evaluates three proposed metallicity corrections γ(W_VI) ≃ 0, −0.25, −0.50 mag dex^{-1}. These yield μ_{0,WVI} ≃ 24.39, 24.16, 23.93, with the larger corrections disfavored relative to the weighted mean of independent IC1613 TRGB/TRGB+JAGB distances from EDD (24.39^{+0.07}_{-0.04}) and CCHP (24.36±0.06 / 24.45±0.11).

Significance. If the central result holds after methods clarification, the work supplies a useful Gaia-independent cross-check on Cepheid metallicity effects using HST parallaxes, which is relevant to the extragalactic distance ladder and Hubble constant determinations. The explicit call for a wider metallicity baseline and additional non-Gaia parallaxes is a constructive note.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Methods (HST parallax unification)] Abstract and Methods section on HST parallax unification: The abstract states the comparison and resulting μ_{0,WVI} values but supplies no details on how the 18 HST parallaxes were combined into a single IC1613 distance, how errors were propagated, or what data selection (if any) was applied. This procedure is load-bearing for the derived distances that drive the disfavoring of γ = −0.25 and −0.50.
  2. [Results (TRGB benchmark comparison)] Results section (TRGB benchmark comparison): The disfavoring of larger γ rests on the numerical mismatch with the EDD/CCHP TRGB mean; however, the text does not include an explicit statement or table confirming that the cited TRGB and JAGB zero-points contain no shared calibration steps or systematics with the HST-parallax Cepheid PL relation under test.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract could briefly state the metallicity range spanned by the 18 Cepheids to contextualize the call for a more expansive baseline.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive review. We address the two major comments below by expanding the manuscript with the requested details and clarifications. Both points can be resolved through textual additions without altering the core results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Methods (HST parallax unification)] Abstract and Methods section on HST parallax unification: The abstract states the comparison and resulting μ_{0,WVI} values but supplies no details on how the 18 HST parallaxes were combined into a single IC1613 distance, how errors were propagated, or what data selection (if any) was applied. This procedure is load-bearing for the derived distances that drive the disfavoring of γ = −0.25 and −0.50.

    Authors: We agree that the Methods section would benefit from explicit details on the unification procedure. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection describing the weighted combination of the 18 HST parallaxes (using the published values and uncertainties from the original HST programs), the error propagation via standard inverse-variance weighting, and the data selection (all 18 Galactic classical Cepheids with HST parallaxes that satisfy the period and quality cuts used in the PL fit). This addition makes the load-bearing step fully reproducible while leaving the reported μ_{0,WVI} values unchanged. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results (TRGB benchmark comparison)] Results section (TRGB benchmark comparison): The disfavoring of larger γ rests on the numerical mismatch with the EDD/CCHP TRGB mean; however, the text does not include an explicit statement or table confirming that the cited TRGB and JAGB zero-points contain no shared calibration steps or systematics with the HST-parallax Cepheid PL relation under test.

    Authors: We acknowledge the value of an explicit independence statement. The EDD and CCHP TRGB/JAGB distances rely on the tip-of-the-red-giant-branch and JAGB calibrations anchored to the LMC and/or NGC 4258, which are independent of the HST Galactic Cepheid parallaxes used here. In the revised version we have inserted a clarifying paragraph and a short table listing the distinct zero-point anchors and systematic sources for each benchmark, confirming no shared calibration steps with the HST-parallax Cepheid PL relation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; relies on external TRGB benchmarks from other groups

full rationale

The paper derives an IC1613 distance modulus from 18 HST parallaxes of Galactic Cepheids (Gaia-independent) and then tests proposed metallicity corrections γ(W_VI) by comparing resulting μ0,WVI values (24.39, 24.16, 23.93) against a weighted mean of TRGB/TRGB-JAGB distances cited from EDD (24.39+0.07−0.04) and CCHP (24.36±0.06 / 24.45±0.11). These benchmarks are external citations to other groups' work; no equations or text in the abstract reduce the conclusion to a fit from the same Cepheid data, a self-citation chain, or a renamed ansatz. The derivation is therefore self-contained against independent external anchors.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the accuracy of published HST parallaxes for 18 Galactic Cepheids, the independence of TRGB/JAGB distances from the Cepheid method, and the assumption that IC1613 provides a useful metallicity baseline. No free parameters are fitted in the reported comparison; the γ values are taken from prior proposals.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption HST parallaxes can be unified into a single zero-point independent of Gaia DR3 concerns
    Used to establish the Gaia-independent IC1613 distance
  • domain assumption TRGB and JAGB distances from EDD and CCHP are accurate and free of Cepheid-related systematics
    Serve as the benchmark against which metallicity corrections are judged

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5742 in / 1391 out tokens · 22620 ms · 2026-06-28T12:26:30.344632+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 101 canonical work pages · 11 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    S., Rizzi, L., Tully, R

    Anand, G. S., Rizzi, L., Tully, R. B., et al. 2021, AJ, 162, 80, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac0440

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac0440 2021

  2. [2]

    I., Saio, H., Ekstr¨ om, S., Georgy, C., & Meynet, G

    Anderson, R. I., Saio, H., Ekstr¨ om, S., Georgy, C., & Meynet, G. 2016, A&A, 591, A8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201528031

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201528031 2016

  3. [3]

    2021, AJ, 161, 147, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abd806

    Demleitner, M., & Andrae, R. 2021, AJ, 161, 147, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abd806

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd806 2021

  4. [4]

    2018, AJ, 156, 58, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aacb21

    Mantelet, G., & Andrae, R. 2018, AJ, 156, 58, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aacb21

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aacb21 2018

  5. [5]

    F., McArthur, B

    Benedict, G. F., McArthur, B. E., Fredrick, L. W., et al. 2002, AJ, 124, 1695, doi: 10.1086/342014

    work page doi:10.1086/342014 2002

  6. [6]

    F., McArthur, B

    Benedict, G. F., McArthur, B. E., Feast, M. W., et al. 2007, AJ, 133, 1810, doi: 10.1086/511980

    work page doi:10.1086/511980 2007

  7. [7]

    N., Dambis, A

    Berdnikov, L. N., Dambis, A. K., & Vozyakova, O. V. 2000, A&AS, 143, 211, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000177

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:2000177 2000

  8. [8]

    A., Kudritzki, R.-P., Urbaneja, M

    Berger, T. A., Kudritzki, R.-P., Urbaneja, M. A., et al. 2018, ApJ, 860, 130, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac493

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac493 2018

  9. [9]

    M., Macri, L

    Bhardwaj, A., Kanbur, S. M., Macri, L. M., et al. 2016, AJ, 151, 88, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/151/4/88

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/4/88 2016

  10. [10]

    Bobylev, V. V. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.11871, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.11871

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.11871 2025

  11. [11]

    F., & Pietrinferni, A

    Bono, G., Braga, V. F., & Pietrinferni, A. 2024, A&A Rv, 32, 4, doi: 10.1007/s00159-024-00153-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-024-00153-0 2024

  12. [12]

    2008, ApJ, 684, 102, doi: 10.1086/589965

    Bono, G., Caputo, F., Fiorentino, G., Marconi, M., & Musella, I. 2008, ApJ, 684, 102, doi: 10.1086/589965

    work page doi:10.1086/589965 2008

  13. [13]

    2010, ApJ, 715, 277, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/715/1/277 7

    Bono, G., Caputo, F., Marconi, M., & Musella, I. 2010, ApJ, 715, 277, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/715/1/277 7

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/715/1/277 2010

  14. [14]

    1999, in IAU

    Bono, G., & Marconi, M. 1999, in IAU

    1999

  15. [15]

    On the Period-Luminosity-Color Relation of Classical Cepheids

    Symposium, Vol. 190, New Views of the Magellanic Clouds, ed. Y. H. Chu, N. Suntzeff, J. Hesser, & D. Bohlender, 527, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9810460

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9810460

  16. [16]

    A., Gieren, W., Pietrzy´ nski, G., & Kudritzki, R.-P

    Bresolin, F., Urbaneja, M. A., Gieren, W., Pietrzy´ nski, G., & Kudritzki, R.-P. 2007, ApJ, 671, 2028, doi: 10.1086/522571

    work page doi:10.1086/522571 2007

  17. [17]

    2019, in SF2A-2019: Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the French Society of Astronomy and Astrophysics, ed

    Breuval, L., & Kervella, P. 2019, in SF2A-2019: Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the French Society of Astronomy and Astrophysics, ed. P. Di Matteo, O. Creevey, A. Crida, G. Kordopatis, J. Malzac, J. B. Marquette, M. N’Diaye, & O. Venot, Di

    2019

  18. [18]

    G., Kervella, P., Anderson, R

    Breuval, L., Riess, A. G., Kervella, P., Anderson, R. I., & Romaniello, M. 2022, ApJ, 939, 89, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac97e2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac97e2 2022

  19. [19]

    I., et al

    Breuval, L., Kervella, P., Anderson, R. I., et al. 2020, A&A, 643, A115, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038633

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038633 2020

  20. [20]

    G., Casertano, S., et al

    Breuval, L., Riess, A. G., Casertano, S., et al. 2024, ApJ, 973, 30, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad630e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad630e 2024

  21. [21]

    S., Anderson, R

    Breuval, L., Anand, G. S., Anderson, R. I., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.15936, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.15936

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.15936 2025

  22. [22]

    Caldwell, J. A. R., & Coulson, I. M. 1985, MNRAS, 212, 879, doi: 10.1093/mnras/212.4.879

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/212.4.879 1985

  23. [23]

    M., Macri, L

    Chavez, J. M., Macri, L. M., & Pellerin, A. 2012, AJ, 144, 113, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/144/4/113

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/144/4/113 2012

  24. [24]

    2022, ApJ, 939, 28, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac94c0

    Hwang, N. 2022, ApJ, 939, 28, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac94c0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac94c0 2022

  25. [25]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.16118, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.16118

    Das, S., Bhardwaj, A., & Marconi, M. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.16118, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.16118

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.16118 2025

  26. [26]

    2015, ApJ, 806, 21, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/21 Grion Filho, D., Guhathakurta, P., Rinehart, S

    Davies, B., Kudritzki, R.-P., Gazak, Z., et al. 2015, ApJ, 806, 21, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/21 De Somma, G., Marconi, M., Molinaro, R., et al. 2022, ApJS, 262, 25, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac7f3b

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/806/1/21 2015

  27. [27]

    ArXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Efstathiou, G. 2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2007.10716, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2007.10716

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.10716 2020

  28. [28]

    M., Kochanek, C

    Fausnaugh, M. M., Kochanek, C. S., Gerke, J. R., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 3597, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv881

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv881 2015

  29. [29]

    2014, MNRAS, 444, L6, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slu103

    Francis, C. 2014, MNRAS, 444, L6, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slu103

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slu103 2014

  30. [30]

    L., Madore, B

    Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., Scowcroft, V., et al. 2011, AJ, 142, 192, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/142/6/192

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/142/6/192 2011

  31. [31]

    ApJ , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Stanek, K. Z., & Macri, L. M. 2011, ApJ, 743, 176, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/176

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/743/2/176 2011

  32. [32]

    2018, A&A, 620, A99, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833263

    Gieren, W., Storm, J., Konorski, P., et al. 2018, A&A, 620, A99, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833263

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833263 2018

  33. [33]

    B., et al

    Graczyk, D., Pietrzy´ nski, G., Thompson, I. B., et al. 2014, ApJ, 780, 59, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/780/1/59

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/780/1/59 2014

  34. [34]

    B., et al

    Graczyk, D., Pietrzy´ nski, G., Thompson, I. B., et al. 2020, ApJ, 904, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abbb2b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abbb2b 2020

  35. [35]

    Groenewegen, M. A. T. 2013, A&A, 550, A70, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220446

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220446 2013

  36. [36]

    Groenewegen, M. A. T. 2018, A&A, 619, A8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833478

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833478 2018

  37. [37]

    L., Macri, L

    Hoffmann, S. L., Macri, L. M., Riess, A. G., et al. 2016, ApJ, 830, 10, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/830/1/10

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/830/1/10 2016

  38. [38]

    The Chicago Carnegie Hubble Program: Improving the Calibration of SNe Ia with JWST Measurements of the Tip of the Red Giant Branch

    Hoyt, T. J., Jang, I. S., Freedman, W. L., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.11769, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.11769

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.11769 2025

  39. [39]

    C., Stetson, P

    Kennicutt, Jr., R. C., Stetson, P. B., Saha, A., et al. 1998, ApJ, 498, 181, doi: 10.1086/305538

    work page doi:10.1086/305538 1998

  40. [40]

    E., Cracraft, M., et al

    Kervella, P., Bond, H. E., Cracraft, M., et al. 2014, A&A, 572, A7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424395

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424395 2014

  41. [41]

    R., et al

    Kervella, P., Gallenne, A., Evans, N. R., et al. 2019, A&A, 623, A117, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834211

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834211 2019

  42. [42]

    I., Ekstr¨ om, S., Georgy, C., & Breuval, L

    Khan, S., Anderson, R. I., Ekstr¨ om, S., Georgy, C., & Breuval, L. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.22512, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.22512

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.22512 2025

  43. [43]

    I., Miglio, A., Mosser, B., & Elsworth, Y

    Khan, S., Anderson, R. I., Miglio, A., Mosser, B., & Elsworth, Y. P. 2023, A&A, 680, A105, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347919

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347919 2023

  44. [44]

    J., Monson, A

    Lee, A. J., Monson, A. J., Freedman, W. L., et al. 2024, ApJ, 967, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad32c7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad32c7 2024

  45. [45]

    2014, ApJS, 210, 6, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/210/1/6

    Lee, J.-W., L´ opez-Morales, M., Hong, K., et al. 2014, ApJS, 210, 6, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/210/1/6

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/210/1/6 2014

  46. [46]

    2021, A&A, 649, A4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039653 8

    Lindegren, L., Bastian, U., Biermann, M., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039653 8

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039653 2021

  47. [47]

    2011, The Astronomical Journal, 142, 51, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/142/2/51

    Gieren, W., & Graczyk, D. 2011, AJ, 142, 51, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/142/2/51

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/142/2/51 2011

  48. [48]

    M., Stanek, K

    Macri, L. M., Stanek, K. Z., Bersier, D., Greenhill, L. J., & Reid, M. J. 2006, ApJ, 652, 1133, doi: 10.1086/508530

    work page doi:10.1086/508530 2006

  49. [49]

    M., Calzetti, D., Freedman, W

    Macri, L. M., Calzetti, D., Freedman, W. L., et al. 2001, ApJ, 549, 721, doi: 10.1086/319465

    work page doi:10.1086/319465 2001

  50. [50]

    F., & Freedman, W

    Madore, B. F., & Freedman, W. L. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2309.10859, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2309.10859

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.10859 2023

  51. [51]

    F., & Freedman, W

    Madore, B. F., & Freedman, W. L. 2025, ApJ, 983, 161, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adbd3d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adbd3d 2025

  52. [52]

    F., Freedman, W

    Madore, B. F., Freedman, W. L., & Owens, K. 2025, ApJ, 981, 32, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada3d5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada3d5 2025

  53. [53]

    The Cepheids of Centaurus A (NGC 5128) and Implications for H0

    Majaess, D. 2010, AcA, 60, 121, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1006.2458

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1006.2458 2010

  54. [54]

    2020, ApJ, 897, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8d1f

    Majaess, D. 2020, ApJ, 897, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8d1f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab8d1f 2020

  55. [55]

    2024, MNRAS, 529, 2627, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae691

    Majaess, D. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 2627, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae691

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae691 2024

  56. [56]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.04998, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.04998

    Majaess, D. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.04998, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.04998

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.04998 2025

  57. [57]

    2018, Ap&SS, 363, 127, doi: 10.1007/s10509-018-3346-6

    Majaess, D., D´ ek´ any, I., Hajdu, G., et al. 2018, Ap&SS, 363, 127, doi: 10.1007/s10509-018-3346-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s10509-018-3346-6 2018

  58. [58]

    2016, A&A, 593, A124, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628763

    Majaess, D., Turner, D., D´ ek´ any, I., Minniti, D., & Gieren, W. 2016, A&A, 593, A124, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628763

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628763 2016

  59. [59]

    2011a, ApJL, 741, L36, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/741/2/L36

    Majaess, D., Turner, D., & Gieren, W. 2011a, ApJL, 741, L36, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/741/2/L36

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/741/2/l36 2041

  60. [60]

    2012a, PASP, 124, 1035, doi: 10.1086/668292

    Majaess, D., Turner, D., & Gieren, W. 2012a, PASP, 124, 1035, doi: 10.1086/668292

    work page doi:10.1086/668292

  61. [61]

    2013a, Ap&SS, 344, 381, doi: 10.1007/s10509-012-1331-z

    Majaess, D., Turner, D., Gieren, W., Berdnikov, L., & Lane, D. 2013a, Ap&SS, 344, 381, doi: 10.1007/s10509-012-1331-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s10509-012-1331-z

  62. [62]

    2012b, ApJL, 752, L10, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/752/1/L10

    Majaess, D., Turner, D., Gieren, W., & Lane, D. 2012b, ApJL, 752, L10, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/752/1/L10

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/752/1/l10 2041

  63. [63]

    Type II Cepheids as Extragalactic Distance Candles

    Majaess, D., Turner, D., & Lane, D. 2009, AcA, 59, 403, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.0909.0181

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.0909.0181 2009

  64. [64]

    G., & Gieren, W

    Majaess, D., Turner, D. G., & Gieren, W. 2013b, ApJ, 772, 130, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/772/2/130

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/772/2/130

  65. [65]

    G., Gieren, W., & Ngeow, C

    Majaess, D., Turner, D. G., Gieren, W., & Ngeow, C. 2014, A&A, 572, A64, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424444

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424444 2014

  66. [66]

    2008, MNRAS, 388, 117, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13249.x 2, 14 —

    Majaess, D., Turner, D. G., & Lane, D. J. 2008, MNRAS, 390, 1539, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13834.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13834.x 2008

  67. [67]

    Deep Infrared ZAMS Fits to Benchmark Open Clusters Hosting delta Scuti Stars

    Majaess, D., Turner, D. G., Lane, D. J., & Krajci, T. 2011b, JAAVSO, 39, 219, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1102.1705

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1102.1705

  68. [68]

    2009, Mem

    Marconi, M. 2009, Mem. Soc. Astron. Italiana, 80, 141

    2009

  69. [69]

    Stanek, K. Z. 2004, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 310, IAU Colloquium 193: Variable Stars in the Local Group, ed. D. W. Kurtz & K. R. Pollard, 41, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0402309

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0402309 2004

  70. [70]

    2023, MNRAS, 520, 4154, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad440

    Molinaro, R., Ripepi, V., Marconi, M., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 4154, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad440

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad440 2023

  71. [71]

    2025, A&A, 697, A30, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553733

    Narloch, W., Hajdu, G., Pietrzy´ nski, G., et al. 2025, A&A, 697, A30, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553733

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553733 2025

  72. [72]

    2012, ApJ, 747, 50, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/747/1/50

    Ngeow, C.-C. 2012, ApJ, 747, 50, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/747/1/50

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/747/1/50 2012

  73. [73]

    Lee, A. J. 2022, ApJ, 927, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac479e Pietrzy´ nski, G., Gieren, W., Udalski, A., et al. 2004, AJ, 128, 2815, doi: 10.1086/425531

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac479e 2022

  74. [74]

    G., & Breuval, L

    Riess, A. G., & Breuval, L. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2308.10954, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2308.10954

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.10954 2023

  75. [75]

    MacKenty, J., & Filippenko, A. V. 2014, ApJ, 785, 161, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/785/2/161

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/785/2/161 2014

  76. [76]

    G., Casertano, S., Yuan, W., et al

    Riess, A. G., Casertano, S., Yuan, W., et al. 2021, ApJL, 908, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abdbaf

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abdbaf 2021

  77. [77]

    G., Macri, L., Casertano, S., et al

    Riess, A. G., Macri, L., Casertano, S., et al. 2011, ApJ, 730, 119, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/730/2/119

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/730/2/119 2011

  78. [78]

    G., Macri, L

    Riess, A. G., Macri, L. M., Hoffmann, S. L., et al. 2016, ApJ, 826, 56, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/56

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/826/1/56 2016

  79. [79]

    G., Casertano, S., Yuan, W., et al

    Riess, A. G., Casertano, S., Yuan, W., et al. 2018a, ApJ, 855, 136, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaadb7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaadb7

  80. [80]

    G., Casertano, S., Yuan, W., et al

    Riess, A. G., Casertano, S., Yuan, W., et al. 2018b, ApJ, 861, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac82e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac82e

Showing first 80 references.