Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

L1495 Revisited: A PPMAP View of a Star-Forming Filament

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Re-analysing the Taurus filament L1495 with a temperature-resolving dust model, this paper finds it sits right at the critical line-density — mass per unit length — for collapse, and that its interior dust has a lower emissivity index…

desk verdict A solid PPMAP re-analysis that revises L1495's width and line density downward, but the trans-critical headline depends on p=2 fits that the paper's own p=4 fits would likely overturn. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.02295 v1 pith:S4AMZGKE submitted 2019-08-06 astro-ph.GA

A. D. P. Howard , A. P. Whitworth , K. A. Marsh , S. D. Clarke , M. J.Griffin , M. W. L. Smith , O. D. Lomax This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords submillimetre:ISMISM:structureduststars:formationPPMAPL1495prestellarcoresemissivityindex
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Filaments are thought to be the structures that gather gas into prestellar cores, and the main filament in the Taurus cloud L1495 is one of the closest and best-studied examples. This paper re-analyses Herschel and SCUBA-2 continuum observations of that filament with PPMAP, a Bayesian fitting procedure that — unlike standard single-temperature analyses — lets each line of sight contain dust at several temperatures and with several emissivity indices. The added freedom changes the picture: once the warm outer layers are separated from the cold spine, the inferred surface density and line-density fall, and the filament is on average trans-critical (median $\mu = 17.6^{+6.9}_{-6.6}\,M_\odot\,\mathrm{pc}^{-1}$, against $\mu_C \simeq 16.2\,M_\odot\,\mathrm{pc}^{-1}$ at 10 K), not firmly supercritical as previously reported. The locally supercritical segments are precisely the ones that host prestellar cores, which is what one would expect if the local line-density, not the global average, decides where a filament fragments. The same data show that the dust inside the filament has emissivity index $\beta \leq 1.5$ whereas dust outside has $\beta \geq 1.7$, implying that the dense filamentary environment has changed the dust itself.

What carries the argument

The carrier of the argument is PPMAP, a Bayesian fitting procedure that represents each line of sight as a superposition of dust in twelve temperature bins (7 to 40 K) and four emissivity-index bins ($\beta = 1.0$, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5), returning a four-dimensional cube of optical-depth contributions $\Delta^2\tau_{300:k\ell}$ at the reference wavelength 300 μm. Because the input maps keep their native resolutions and several components are allowed per pixel, this cube separates the warm outer layers from the cold spine gas — which drives the reduction in surface density $\Sigma$ and line-density $\mu$ — and separates dust types — which reveals the interior $\beta \leq 1.5$. A tight Gaussian prior on $\beta$ (mean 2.0, standard deviation 0.25) keeps the procedure from leaving the canonical value unless the data really require it. The resulting profiles are interpreted with Plummer-like fits, $n(r) = n_O[1 + (r/r_O)^2]^{-p/2}$, and judged against the critical line-density $\mu_C = 2c_S^2/G \simeq 16.2\,M_\odot\,\mathrm{pc}^{-1}$ for an isothermal gas at 10 K ($c_S = 0.19$ km s$^{-1}$).

What would settle it

Measure the column density of the L1495 Main Filament by a route that does not assume the dust opacity law, for example near-infrared extinction mapping along the same spine. The reported spine column density, $N_{\mathrm{H_2}} \simeq 6.4\times10^{21}\,\mathrm{H_2\,cm^{-2}}$, corresponds to roughly 6–8 magnitudes of visual extinction, well within reach of existing NIR surveys; if the extinction-based line-density reproduces the earlier single-temperature value ($\mu \simeq 54\,M_\odot\,\mathrm{pc}^{-1}$) instead of the trans-critical median ($\mu \simeq 17.6\,M_\odot\,\mathrm{pc}^{-1}$), then the paper's mass calibration — and with it the trans-critical classification and the association of prestellar cores with supercritical segments — is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Re-analysing the Herschel and SCUBA-2 maps of the L1495 Main Filament with PPMAP, we find that previous estimates of the filament's width and line-density need to be revised downward, and that the dust in the filament is not the same as the dust around it. The column-density profile of the whole filament has FWHM $\simeq 0.087 \pm 0.003$ pc, but the closeness of this value to earlier estimates is coincidental: evaluated the way earlier studies evaluate widths (a Gaussian fit to the profile centre), the same data give FWHM $\simeq 0.056$ pc. Because PPMAP separates dust at different temperatures along each line of sight, the warm outer layers of the filament are no longer counted as dense spine gas, and the line-density drops to a median of $\mu = 17.6^{+6.9}_{-6.6}\,M_\odot\,\mathrm{pc}^{-1}$. Adopting the canonical critical line-density $\mu_C \simeq 16.2\,M_\odot\,\mathrm{pc}^{-1}$ for an isothermal filament at 10 K, the filament is trans-critical on average, and the local segments with $\mu > \mu_C$ preferentially host the prestellar cores (median $25.5\,M_\odot\,\mathrm{pc}^{-1}$, versus $16.8\,M_\odot\,\mathrm{pc}^{-1}$ for the remaining segments). The dust in the filament interior also differs from the surroundings: the line-of-sight mean emissivity index is $\bar{\beta} \leq 1.5$ inside and $\bar{\beta} \geq 1.7$ outside, which we attribute to dust growth in the dense medium — mantle accretion whose timescale ($\sim 0.3$ Myr at $n_{\mathrm{H_2}} \sim 10^4\,\mathrm{cm^{-3}}$) is short enough to act before the dynamical timescale.

Load-bearing premise

Every mass and line-density in the paper is obtained by converting the measured dust optical depth into gas mass using fixed assumed values for the dust-to-gas mass ratio ($Z_D = 0.01$) and the dust opacity at 300 μm ($\kappa_{300} = 10\,\mathrm{cm^2\,g^{-1}}$), and the paper itself warns that the very dust changes it detects are likely to be accompanied by changes in both values, of unknown size and sign — if they differ from the assumed constants, the inferred line-density and the trans-critical classification move with them.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Previous estimates that the L1495 filament is supercritical throughout its length ($\mu \simeq 54\,M_\odot\,\mathrm{pc}^{-1}$) are replaced by a trans-critical median, so the stability question shifts from the whole filament to its individual segments.
  • Fragmentation follows the local line-density: the prestellar cores sit almost exclusively on segments with $\mu > \mu_C$ (median $25.5$ versus $16.8\,M_\odot\,\mathrm{pc}^{-1}$), and a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test gives only a $4\times10^{-6}$ probability that core-bearing and other segments share one line-density distribution.
  • Column-density maps of this and other filaments cannot be read off a single opacity law: the interior dust ($\beta \leq 1.5$) and the exterior dust ($\beta \geq 1.7$) require different conversions from optical depth to mass.
  • The better fits obtained locally with $p = 4$ (reduced $\chi^2 = 8.35$ versus $29.23$ for $p = 2$) indicate that small segments of the filament approximate isothermal cylinders in hydrostatic equilibrium, even though the averaged global profile looks shallower.
  • Mantle accretion inside the filament is viable: at central densities near $10^4\,\mathrm{H_2\,cm^{-3}}$ the accretion timescale ($\sim 0.3$ Myr) is comparable to the local freefall time, which is what is needed for the dust properties to change in place.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same single-temperature, single-$\beta$ screen that inflated the L1495 mass is common in filament studies, so the bias this paper exposes — counting warm outer layers as dense spine gas — probably lowers the true masses of many other filaments, with the correction growing as the fraction of low-$\beta$ dust near the spine grows.
  • If local line-density governs fragmentation, one can predict that in any long filament the positions of prestellar cores should trace the segments where $\mu > \mu_C$, and the coincidence should sharpen as the angular resolution of the dust decomposition approaches the filament's thermal scale length; L1495 is a single-region realisation of that prediction.
  • An independent calibration of the optical-depth-to-mass conversion — near-infrared extinction or polarised dust emission across the same spine, neither of which assumes $\kappa_{300} = 10\,\mathrm{cm^2\,g^{-1}}$ or $Z_D = 0.01$ — would settle whether the trans-critical verdict survives the very dust evolution the paper invokes.
  • The analysis masks out optically thick protostellar cores (0.08 pc circles) before fitting, and those patches are exactly where a single opacity law fails hardest; a version of the procedure that models optically thick emission would test whether the hidden mass in those patches changes the census of supercritical segments.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript re-analyses Herschel and SCUBA-2 observations of the L1495 main filament with the PPMAP procedure, which fits multiple dust temperatures and emissivity indices at native angular resolution rather than smoothing all bands to the 500 micron beam. Section 6 produces total column-density and beta maps; Section 7 fits Plummer-like profiles to a global average profile and to 92 local segments along the filament. With p fixed to 2, the median segment line-density is reported as about 17.6-17.8 M_sun/pc, close to the critical value 16.2 M_sun/pc, and segments above critical preferentially host prestellar cores. Section 7.4 reports that p=4 fits are actually better, and Section 9 argues that synthetic maps generated from PPMAP results reproduce the Herschel maps better than synthetic maps generated from the standard procedure of Palmeirim et al.

Significance. If the central results hold, the paper makes a useful contribution: it supports the idea that standard single-temperature, single-beta fits overestimate filament surface densities and line-densities, and it strengthens the case that local line-density regulates core formation by showing a strong KS association between supercritical segments and prestellar cores. The synthetic-map comparison in Table 2 is a real strength, as is the use of multi-wavelength data at native resolution. However, the trans-critical conclusion is derived from p=2 fits even though the paper's own p=4 fits are better, and the beta dichotomy rests on a strong prior with no sensitivity test; these issues leave the headline claims not yet fully supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 7.3 (footnote 5) and Section 7.4]
  2. [Sections 5 and 6 (beta prior)]
  3. [Sections 3.2-3.3 and 7.3]
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 7.3 and Conclusions]
  2. [Figure 6 and Section 7.3]
  3. [Abstract]
  4. [Equation (15)]
  5. [Section 9.2]
  6. [Section 7.4]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: line-density and beta results are data-driven; fixed p=2 exponent is a model-sensitivity caveat, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

PPMAP maps are fitted directly to the Herschel/SCUBA-2 intensities (Eq. 11); the total optical depth, column-density and line-density follow from the stated conversion factors (Eqs. 3-9). The Plummer fits (Eq. 19) determine N0, r0 and p from the data, and mu is obtained by integrating the fitted profile, not by assuming mu is close to mu_C. The beta result is a regularized Bayesian output with the Gaussian prior stated explicitly, and the paper demonstrates that the resulting maps reproduce the Herschel data better than the standard procedure (Table 2), so the beta contrast is not imposed by construction. The core comparison uses an external catalogue and a KS test, so it is not tautological. Self-citations (Marsh et al., Clarke et al., Whitworth) support the method and interpretive scenario but are not the sole evidence for the central measurements; the synthetic-map comparison provides independent internal validation. The fixed p=2 choice in Sec. 7.3 is a model-sensitivity caveat: footnote 5 asserts little influence on the global parameters, while Sec. 7.4 shows p=4 fits better and returns a larger rO, and no p=4 line-densities are reported. This is a robustness concern, not an equation-level circularity, because mu is not defined in terms of p=2 and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. No circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a set of adopted conversion factors (kappa_300, Z_D), a prior for the PPMAP beta decomposition, and standard assumptions of optical thinness, cylindrical symmetry, isothermality, and co-extensive dust and gas. These are not derived in the paper and are only partially tested. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • kappa_300 (dust absorption opacity at 300 um) = 10 cm^2 g^-1 (assumed canonical value)
    Scales all mass estimates (Eqns. 6-7); if grain growth changes kappa, the quoted mu and NH2 shift. Acknowledged as uncertain in Section 3.3.
  • Z_D (dust-to-gas mass ratio) = 0.01 (assumed)
    Used in Eqns. 4-7; likely correlated with kappa if beta changes, as noted in Section 3.3.
  • PPMAP beta prior hyperparameters = Gaussian mean 2.0, sigma 0.25
    Chosen to regularize the beta-T degeneracy (Section 5); directly affects the beta maps and the claim of low beta inside the filament.
  • Filament boundary radius r_B = 0.4 pc (assumed)
    Used in Eqn. 22 for the Global Average Profile line-density; local segment fits avoid r_B via background subtraction.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The dust is optically thin at all Herschel and SCUBA-2 wavelengths used.
    Invoked in Eqn. 10 and Section 5; optically thick protostellar cores are masked, but residual opacity would bias the decomposition.
  • domain assumption The filament is locally cylindrically symmetric and the line of sight crosses a single cylindrical structure.
    Used throughout Section 7 for spine definition, Local Sample Profiles, and Plummer fits.
  • domain assumption The gas is isothermal at about 10 K for comparison with the critical line-density.
    Section 7.3 states there are no robust constraints on the sound speed and adopts c_s = 0.19 km/s.
  • domain assumption Dust and gas are co-extensive and well-mixed.
    Assumed in Section 3.2 for converting tau_300 to NH2 and Sigma.
  • domain assumption A Plummer-like profile (Eqn. 18) describes the filament's true volumetric density cross-section.
    Used for fitting Global and Segment Average Profiles; the p=2 vs p=4 choice is tested but the functional form is assumed.
  • ad hoc to paper The PPMAP beta prior is weak enough that the data dominate the inferred beta distribution.
    Section 5 states the prior is needed to regulate degeneracy; the paper does not test sensitivity to the prior width.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of L1495 Revisited: A PPMAP View of a Star-Forming Filament." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/S4AMZGKE

@misc{pith2026190802295,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: L1495 Revisited: A PPMAP View of a Star-Forming Filament},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/S4AMZGKE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.02295}
}
abstract

We have analysed the Herschel and SCUBA-2 dust continuum observations of the main filament in the Taurus L1495 star forming region, using the Bayesian fitting procedure PPMAP. (i) If we construct an average profile along the whole length of the filament, it has fwhm $\simeq 0.087\pm 0.003\,{\rm pc};\;$, but the closeness to previous estimates is coincidental. (ii) If we analyse small local sections of the filament, the column-density profile approximates well to the form predicted for hydrostatic equilibrium of an isothermal cylinder. (iii) The ability of PPMAP to distinguish dust emitting at different temperatures, and thereby to discriminate between the warm outer layers of the filament and the cold inner layers near the spine, leads to a significant reduction in the surface-density, $\varSigma$, and hence in the line-density, $\mu$. If we adopt the canonical value for the critical line-density at a gas-kinetic temperature of $10\,{\rm K}$, $\mu_{_{\rm CRIT}}\simeq 16\,{\rm M_{_\odot}\,pc^{-1}}$, the filament is on average trans-critical, with ${\bar\mu}\sim \mu_{_{\rm CRIT}};\;$ local sections where $\mu >\mu_{_{\rm CRIT}}$ tend to lie close to pre-stellar cores. (iv) The ability of PPMAP to distinguish different types of dust, i.e. dust characterised by different values of the emissivity index, $\beta$, reveals that the dust in the filament has a lower emissivity index, $\beta\leq1.5$, than the dust outside the filament, $\beta\geq 1.7$, implying that the physical conditions in the filament have effected a change in the properties of the dust.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.02295 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Six contiguous temperature slices for the L1495 region. Each panel gives the distribution of dust with temperature close to the value marked in the top left corner. The white circles are masked-out, optically thick cores. The angular resolution is 1800, which is equivalent to ∼ 0.013 pc at the distance of Taurus. The colour-bar gives the column-density of molecular hydrogen, NH2 , in units of 1020 H2 cm−2 . The red … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Emissivity-index slices for the L1495 region. Each panel gives the distribution of dust with emissivity index close to the value marked in the top left corner. Other details are as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Map of the total column density of molecular hydrogen, NH2 (derived from τ300 using eqn. 6) for the L1495 region. The white circles are masked-out, optically thick cores. The red and blue lines delineate the spines of the B213 and B211 sub-filaments (which together make up the L1495 Main Filament), as identified by the DisPerSE algorithm (see Section 7). The region to the west of this is the L1495 Head. This paper i… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The mean line-of-sight emissivity index, β¯ (top panel) and dust temperature T¯ D (bottom panel) for the L1495 region. The white circles are masked-out, optically thick protostellar cores. The dust in the interior of the filament has lower emissivity index, and is cool…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Profiles of (a) the column density, NH2 (b), (b) the line￾of-sight mean temperature, T¯ D (b), and (c) the line-of-sight mean emissivity index, β¯(b), all three as functions of impact parameter, b (measured relative to the spine of the filament). Pale blue [pink] dots …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Maps illustrating how the various global properties of the filament vary along its length. Each coloured circle sits on one of the 0.05 pc-long segments created by bundling together 12 neighbouring sample points along the spine, and there are 92 segments in total. The …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Kernel-smoothed PDF of µ for the 20 segments that are closest to the 24 prestellar cores (red), and for the remaining 72 segments (blue). The medians are marked by vertical dashed lines. that some of those prestellar cores have by now had time to become protostars; B21…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Reading from top left to bottom right, the panels on the diagonal show the distributions of (a) NO , (c) fwhm, (f) µ and (j) S for the segments along the L1495 Main Filament; the text above each of these panels gives the identity of the parameter, its mean value, and i…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Panels in the lefthand and righthand columns show synthetic maps in four different Herschel bands, derived from, respectively, the ppmap and the P13 results; panels in the central column show the corresponding true Herschel maps. From top to bottom the different rows c…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bipolar HII regions Produced by Cloud-Cloud Collisions

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Head-on collisions of 500 M⊙ clouds form hub-filament systems and short-lived bipolar HII regions whose appearance depends strongly on viewing angle, with secondary radio and mid-IR metrics that may flag CCC origins.

  2. Sutra : An integrated framework for identification and characterization of filaments in the interstellar medium

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Sutra trains a U-Net on the union of DisPerSE and getsf skeletons to predict filament crest-likelihood maps and then filters and characterizes them with beam-scale Plummer fits.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Andr \' e P., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014666 , 518, L102

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014666 2010

  2. [2]

    Andr \'e P., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628378 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628378 2016

  3. [3]

    Arzoumanian D., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201116596 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2011A&A...529L...6A 529, L6

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116596 2011

  4. [4]

    Arzoumanian D., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201832725 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...621A..42A 621, A42

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832725 2019

  5. [5]

    Bernard J.-P., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014540 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014540 2010

  6. [6]

    S., 2015, @doi [Astronomy and Computing] 10.1016/j.ascom.2014.11.004 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A

    Berry D. S., 2015, @doi [Astronomy and Computing] 10.1016/j.ascom.2014.11.004 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A

    doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2014.11.004 2015

  7. [7]

    V., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv438 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.449.2472B 449, 2472

    Buckle J. V., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv438 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.449.2472B 449, 2472

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv438 2015

  8. [8]

    M., 1986, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/223.2.341 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1986MNRAS.223..341C 223, 341

    Casali M. M., 1986, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/223.2.341 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1986MNRAS.223..341C 223, 341

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/223.2.341 1986

Show all 75 references
  1. [9]

    L., Berry D

    Chapin E. L., Berry D. S., Gibb A. G., Jenness T., Scott D., Tilanus R. P. J., Economou F., Holland W. S., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt052 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.430.2545C 430, 2545

    2013 doi

  2. [10]

    C., Henning T., Mac Low M.-M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731836 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A

    Chira R.-A., Kainulainen J., Ib \'a \ n ez-Mej \' a J. C., Henning T., Mac Low M.-M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731836 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A

    2018 doi

  3. [11]

    D., Whitworth A

    Clarke S. D., Whitworth A. P., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv393 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.449.1819C 449, 1819

    2015 doi

  4. [12]

    D., Whitworth A

    Clarke S. D., Whitworth A. P., Hubber D. A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw407 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.458..319C 458, 319

    2016 doi

  5. [13]

    D., Whitworth A

    Clarke S. D., Whitworth A. P., Duarte-Cabral A., Hubber D. A., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx637 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2017MNRAS.468.2489C 468, 2489

    2017 doi

  6. [14]

    D., Whitworth A

    Clarke S. D., Whitworth A. P., Spowage R. L., Duarte-Cabral A., Suri S. T., Jaffa S. E., Walch S., Clark P. C., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1675 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479.1722C 479, 1722

    2018 doi

  7. [15]

    Cox N. L. J., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527068 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A

    2016 doi

  8. [16]

    T., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094840 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ARA

    Draine B. T., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094840 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ARA

    2003 arXiv

  9. [17]

    H., 1978, @doi [ ] 10.1086/156436 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1978ApJ...224..857E 224, 857

    Elias J. H., 1978, @doi [ ] 10.1086/156436 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1978ApJ...224..857E 224, 857

    1978 doi

  10. [18]

    L., Evans Neal J

    Enoch M. L., Evans Neal J. I., Sargent A. I., Glenn J., Rosolowsky E., Myers P., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/589963 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...684.1240E 684, 1240

    2008 doi

  11. [19]

    G., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201218961 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A

    Fischera J., Martin P. G., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201218961 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A

    2012 doi

  12. [20]

    Giardino G., Favata F., Micela G., Reale F., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20034151 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2004A&A...413..669G 413, 669

    2004 doi

  13. [21]

    J., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014519 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A

    Griffin M. J., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014519 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A

    2010 doi

  14. [22]

    Gritschneder M., Heigl S., Burkert A., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/202 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...834..202G 834, 202

    2017 doi

  15. [23]

    Hacar A., Tafalla M., Kauffmann J., Kov \'a cs A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220090 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2013A&A...554A..55H 554, A55

    2013 doi

  16. [24]

    S., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731894 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A

    Hacar A., Tafalla M., Forbrich J., Alves J., Meingast S., Grossschedl J., Teixeira P. S., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731894 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A

    2018 doi

  17. [25]

    He J., Acharyya K., Vidali G., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/89 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...825...89H 825, 89

    2016 doi

  18. [26]

    Heigl S., Burkert A., Gritschneder M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx3145 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474.4881H 474, 4881

    2018 doi

  19. [27]

    Heitsch F., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/769/2/115 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...769..115H 769, 115

    2013 doi

  20. [28]

    III 2017, PACS Handbook

    Herschel Explanatory Supplement Vol. III 2017, PACS Handbook . 2.0 edn, https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/herschel/legacy-documentation-observatory

    2017

  21. [29]

    IV 2017, SPIRE Handbook

    Herschel Explanatory Supplement Vol. IV 2017, SPIRE Handbook . 3.1 edn, https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/herschel/legacy-documentation-observatory

    2017

  22. [30]

    S., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts612 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.430.2513H 430, 2513

    Holland W. S., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts612 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.430.2513H 430, 2513

    2013 doi

  23. [31]

    M., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1086/171162 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ApJ...388..392I 388, 392

    Inutsuka S.-I., Miyama S. M., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1086/171162 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ApJ...388..392I 388, 392

    1992 doi

  24. [32]

    M., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/303982 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1997ApJ...480..681I 480, 681

    Inutsuka S.-i., Miyama S. M., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/303982 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1997ApJ...480..681I 480, 681

    1997 doi

  25. [33]

    E., Henning T., Stutz A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321760 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A

    Kainulainen J., Ragan S. E., Henning T., Stutz A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321760 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A

    2013 doi

  26. [34]

    Kainulainen J., Hacar A., Alves J., Beuther H., Bouy H., Tafalla M., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526017 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A

    2016 doi

  27. [35]

    M., Stanke T., Abreu-Vicente J., Beuther H., Henning T., Johnston K

    Kainulainen J., Stutz A. M., Stanke T., Abreu-Vicente J., Beuther H., Henning T., Johnston K. G., Megeath S. T., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628481 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A

    2017 doi

  28. [36]

    K \"o nyves V., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201525861 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A

    2015 doi

  29. [37]

    T., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/323147 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...554..778L 554, 778

    Li A., Draine B. T., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/323147 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...554..778L 554, 778

    2001 doi

  30. [38]

    A., Whitworth A

    Marsh K. A., Whitworth A. P., Lomax O., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2248 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454.4282M 454, 4282

    2015 doi

  31. [39]

    A., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw301 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.459..342M 459, 342

    Marsh K. A., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw301 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.459..342M 459, 342

    2016 doi

  32. [40]

    S., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.aa.28.090190.000345 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990ARA

    Mathis J. S., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.aa.28.090190.000345 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990ARA

    1990

  33. [41]

    P., Waters B., Schiebel D., Young W., Golap K., 2007, in Shaw R

    McMullin J. P., Waters B., Schiebel D., Young W., Golap K., 2007, in Shaw R. A., Hill F., Bell D. J., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 376, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI. p. 127

    2007

  34. [42]

    Motte F., Andr \'e P., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20000072 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2001A&A...365..440M 365, 440

    2001 doi

  35. [43]

    Nakamura F., Li Z.-Y., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/591641 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2008ApJ...687..354N 687, 354

    2008 doi

  36. [44]

    B., Ingargiola A., 2014, ] 10.5281/zenodo.11813

    Newville M., Stensitzki T., Allen D. B., Ingargiola A., 2014, ] 10.5281/zenodo.11813

    2014 doi

  37. [45]

    M., Stamatellos D., Ward- Thompson D., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12750.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2008MNRAS.384..755N 384, 755

    Nutter D., Kirk J. M., Stamatellos D., Ward- Thompson D., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12750.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2008MNRAS.384..755N 384, 755

    2008

  38. [46]

    Onishi T., Mizuno A., Kawamura A., Tachihara K., Fukui Y., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/341347 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2002ApJ...575..950O 575, 950

    2002 doi

  39. [47]

    Ossenkopf V., Henning T., 1994, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1994A&A...291..943O 291, 943

    1994

  40. [48]

    Ostriker J., 1964, @doi [ ] 10.1086/148005 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1964ApJ...140.1056O 140, 1056

    1964 doi

  41. [49]

    Palmeirim P., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220500 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A

    2013 doi

  42. [50]

    V., Tassis K., Goldsmith P

    Panopoulou G. V., Tassis K., Goldsmith P. F., Heyer M. H., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1601 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.444.2507P 444, 2507

    2014 doi

  43. [51]

    V., Psaradaki I., Skalidis R., Tassis K., Andrews J

    Panopoulou G. V., Psaradaki I., Skalidis R., Tassis K., Andrews J. J., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw3060 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2017MNRAS.466.2529P 466, 2529

    2017 doi

  44. [52]

    Pearson K., 1895, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Vol. 58, Taylor & Francis

  45. [53]

    Peters T., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx341 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2017MNRAS.467.4322P 467, 4322

    2017 doi

  46. [54]

    Poglitsch A., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014535 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A

    2010 doi

  47. [55]

    E., Pon A., Tafalla M., Hacar A., Bizzocchi L., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731159 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018A&A...617A..27P 617, A27

    Punanova A., Caselli P., Pineda J. E., Pon A., Tafalla M., Hacar A., Bizzocchi L., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731159 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018A&A...617A..27P 617, A27

    2018 doi

  48. [56]

    M., et al., 2010, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.1088/0067-0049/186/2/259 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2010ApJS..186..259R 186, 259

    Rebull L. M., et al., 2010, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.1088/0067-0049/186/2/259 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2010ApJS..186..259R 186, 259

    2010 doi

  49. [57]

    Schmalzl M., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/1327 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...725.1327S 725, 1327

    2010 doi

  50. [58]

    Seifried D., Walch S., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1458 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.452.2410S 452, 2410

    2015 doi

  51. [59]

    Seifried D., S \'a nchez-Monge \'A ., Suri S., Walch S., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx399 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467.4467S 467, 4467

    2017 doi

  52. [60]

    M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/805/2/185 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...805..185S 805, 185

    Seo Y. M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/805/2/185 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...805..185S 805, 185

    2015 doi

  53. [61]

    A., 2009a, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/676 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...696..676S 696, 676

    Shetty R., Kauffmann J., Schnee S., Goodman A. A., 2009a, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/676 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...696..676S 696, 676

    doi

  54. [62]

    A., Ercolano B., 2009b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/696/2/2234 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...696.2234S 696, 2234

    Shetty R., Kauffmann J., Schnee S., Goodman A. A., Ercolano B., 2009b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/696/2/2234 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...696.2234S 696, 2234

    doi

  55. [63]

    H., Adams F

    Shu F. H., Adams F. C., Lizano S., 1987, @doi [Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1146/annurev.aa.25.090187.000323 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1987ARA&A..25...23S 25, 23

    1987

  56. [64]

    J., Glover S

    Smith R. J., Glover S. C. O., Klessen R. S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1915 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.445.2900S 445, 2900

    2014 doi

  57. [65]

    J., Glover S

    Smith R. J., Glover S. C. O., Klessen R. S., Fuller G. A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2559 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.455.3640S 455, 3640

    2016 doi

  58. [66]

    Sousbie T., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18394.x , 414, 350

    2011

  59. [67]

    M., Strom S

    Strom K. M., Strom S. E., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/173886 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...424..237S 424, 237

    1994 doi

  60. [68]

    T., et al., 2019, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2019arXiv190100176S p

    Suri S. T., et al., 2019, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2019arXiv190100176S p. arXiv:1901.00176

    2019 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Tafalla M., Hacar A., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201424576 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A

    2015 doi

  62. [70]

    Ward-Thompson D., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/521277 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007PASP..119..855W 119, 855

    2007 doi

  63. [71]

    Ward-Thompson D., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1978 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2016MNRAS.463.1008W 463, 1008

    2016 doi

  64. [72]

    P., Jaffa S

    Whitworth A. P., Jaffa S. E., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731871 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...611A..20W 611, A20

    2018 doi

  65. [73]

    P., Ward-Thompson D., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/318373 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2001ApJ...547..317W 547, 317

    Whitworth A. P., Ward-Thompson D., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/318373 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2001ApJ...547..317W 547, 317

    2001 doi

  66. [74]

    Zhukovska S., Henning T., Dobbs C., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab438 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2018ApJ...857...94Z 857, 94

    2018 doi

  67. [75]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.