Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Artificial Buildings: Safety, Complexity and a Quantifiable Measure of Beauty

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.11113 v1 pith:S57PG5RF submitted 2020-06-17 cs.OH

classification cs.OH
keywords fullymeasureartificialbuildingscomplexityautomatedbeautyconcerns
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

A place to live is one of the most crucial necessities for all living organisms since the advent of life on planet Earth. The nature of homes has changed considerably over time. At the very early stages, human begins lived in natural places such as caves. Later on, they started to use their intelligence to build places with special purposes. Nowadays, modern technologies such as robotics and artificial intelligence have made their ways into the construction process and opened up a whole new area of opportunities and concerns that may be of interest to both technologists and philosophers. In this article, I review the evolution of buildings from fully natural to fully artificial and discuss philosophical thoughts that a fully automated construction technology may raise. I elaborate on the safety concerns of a fully automated architectural process. Then, I'll borrow Kolmogorov complexity from algorithmic information theory to define a complexity measure for buildings. The proposed measure is then used to provide a quantifiable measure of beauty.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools