Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 78 references

No evidence for a supermassive black hole binary in GSN 069

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Timing of GSN 069's X-ray bursts rules out a black hole binary.

desk verdict A solid null-result paper with a genuinely new survival diagnostic; the central timing exclusion depends on an unpublished cycle-number assignment that should be made public before the claim is treated as settled. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05534 v1 pith:SA2NTPO7 submitted 2026-08-06 astro-ph.HE

Yuhe Zeng , Zhen Pan , Bin Liu , Cong Zhou This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords quasi-periodiceruptionsGSN069supermassiveblackholebinaryextreme-mass-ratioinspirallight-travel-timetimingvonZeipel-Lidov-KozaimechanismX-rayaccretiondisk
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether the quasi-periodic X-ray eruptions from the galactic nucleus GSN 069 carry any timing imprint of a supermassive black hole binary. In the standard picture the eruptions are produced by a stellar-mass object repeatedly crossing an accretion disk around a central black hole, so the eruption clock traces the inner orbit. The authors derive that a distant companion black hole would make the host wobble around the binary's center of mass, adding a light-travel-time delay that appears as an in-phase modulation of even and odd eruption intervals. Fitting this binary-modulation model to GSN 069's observed timings, they find the modulation amplitude is consistent with zero, at 95% credibility $A_0<254\,M_\bullet$, and the log Bayes factor $\log B = -3.31\pm0.25$ strongly favors the single-black-hole model over the companion model. They also show that a surviving stellar orbiter would be tidally disrupted for a range of companion configurations, giving an independent constraint. If correct, GSN 069 shows no evidence for a supermassive black hole binary at the sensitivity of its eruption timing.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the extended QPE timing model: a Bayesian fit to the observed eruption arrival times in which the base hypothesis (single SMBH, apsidal precession producing anti-phase even/odd branches) is compared with a binary-modulation hypothesis that adds the term $\delta t_{\rm binary} = -A_0\cos(\omega t + \Delta\Phi_0)$ from the host's motion about the binary center of mass. The three new parameters $A_0$, $\omega$, and $\Delta\Phi_0$ carry the companion signature, and the Bayes factor between the two models is the quantitative verdict. The secondary machinery is the hierarchical-triple evolution of Liu and Lai (single-averaged, octupole order, 1PN precession), used to map the maximum inner eccentricity over initial inclination and the relativistic-precession parameter $\varepsilon_{\rm GR}$; the boundary $a_{\rm in}(1-e_{\rm in,max})=r_{\rm TDE}$ marks where a surviving star would be tidally disrupted.

What would settle it

Re-fit the GSN 069 eruption timings with an independently determined cycle-number assignment, or with a systematic shift of the even/odd labels; if a significant in-phase modulation appears (for example $\log B>0$ favoring the binary model), the no-companion conclusion is an artifact of the numbering. An independent detection of a sub-parsec binary in GSN 069, for instance through radio imaging or gravitational-wave observations, would also falsify the exclusion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is a null result: the QPE timing of GSN 069 contains no detectable in-phase modulation of the even and odd recurrence branches, the signature an external supermassive black hole would imprint through the host's motion about the binary center of mass. The posteriors place the modulation amplitude at $A_0<254\,M_\bullet$ (95% credibility), and the log Bayes factor $\log B = -3.31\pm0.25$ is read as strong support for the base hypothesis with no companion. The same fit recovers the familiar anti-phase apsidal-precession modulation and a central mass $\log_{10}(M_\bullet/M_\odot)=5.6\pm0.1$, consistent with earlier measurements. For the indirect probe, survival maps computed with single-averaged octupole equations and first-post-Newtonian precession show that a companion in part of the excluded parameter space would drive a solar-type stellar orbiter into tidal disruption, while the TDE boundary itself is nearly insensitive to the assumed initial eccentricity.

Load-bearing premise

The null result depends on the eruption cycle numbers used in the timing analysis being assigned correctly; a different assignment can spuriously create or erase the in-phase modulation that would signal a companion.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • GSN 069's eruption timing does not support the claimed in-phase binary signature, so the supermassive-black-hole-binary interpretation of this source is disfavored unless the underlying cycle-number assignment is revised.
  • The same light-travel-time diagnostic can be applied to other QPE sources with long timing baselines, turning a null-result pipeline into a search for hidden black hole companions in nearby galactic nuclei.
  • The stellar-survival map provides an independent exclusion region whose tidal-disruption boundary is robust to the assumed initial inner eccentricity, so surviving QPE orbiters can constrain companion mass and separation.
  • The recovered central mass of about $4\times10^5\,M_\odot$ under the binary model confirms that QPE timing remains a viable dynamical measurement of the central black hole even when a companion is allowed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The authors' own caveat about cycle-number assignment is the main internal risk: if an independent count of eruption cycles changes the even/odd labeling, the in-phase amplitude could shift, so the null result is only as secure as that labeling.
  • The two diagnostics probe different regions of companion parameter space, so combining them for a single source brackets the allowed companion mass and separation more tightly than either alone.
  • A longer timing baseline for GSN 069, or application to sources with more eruptions, could push the $A_0$ upper limit well below $254\,M_\bullet$ and either reveal a weak signal or sharpen the exclusion.
  • If any future QPE source shows a genuine in-phase modulation, the same framework would yield a direct measurement of companion mass and separation from $A_0$ and $\omega$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes two ways to search for a wide SMBH companion in QPE sources. Section 3 adds the light-travel-time modulation from the host SMBH's motion about the SMBHB center of mass to the QPE timing model of Zhou et al. (2025b). For GSN 069 the authors report A0 < 254 M• at 95% credibility and log B = -3.31 favoring the base hypothesis, hence no SMBHB. Section 4 computes ZLK survival maps for a solar-type stellar EMRI and shows that a TDE boundary in the (i_in,ini, eps_GR) plane is insensitive to initial eccentricity. The paper concludes that QPE timing and stellar survival are complementary probes of hidden SMBH companions.

Significance. If the null result is robust, the paper makes a useful contribution by quantifying the sensitivity of QPE timing to SMBH companions and by providing a survival-based exclusion map. The derivation of Eq. (8) is clean and parameter-free for a circular outer orbit, and the posterior for A0 is internally consistent with zero. The SA evolution equations in Appendix B are given in detail. However, the headline constraint is not yet reproducible: it depends on a discrete cycle-number assignment dismissed in a one-sentence footnote citing an unpublished same-group note, and no arrival-time table or code is provided. The significance of the direct probe is therefore conditional on an unverifiable preprocessing step.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3, footnote 1, Eqs. (13)-(14)] The central null result is conditional on a cycle-number assignment that is neither tabulated nor reproduced. The manuscript dismisses the competing in-phase detection by Miniutti et al. (2025) in footnote 1 by citing Zhou et al. (2026), an unpublished same-group note. In an alternating long/short QPE sequence, shifting one branch by one cycle changes which intervals are labelled even/odd and can create or destroy exactly the in-phase component that Eq. (13) constrains. Because no arrival-time table, cycle-number list, or analysis code is provided, a reader cannot determine whether A0 < 254 M• and log B = -3.31 are artifacts of the preprocessing. The authors should either include the cycle-number table and demonstrate that the result is stable under all self-consistent integer assignments, or soften the claim to be conditional on the adopted assignment.
  2. [Sec. 3, Eq. (14)] The reported log Bayes factor is not accompanied by the likelihood model, evidence integrals, or a definition of the log base (natural vs base 10), and it is computed under the same assumed cycle numbering. Given that the competing detection is dismissed solely by the cycle-number assignment, Eq. (14) cannot be interpreted as a model-independent preference for the base hypothesis. Please specify the exact likelihood, prior volume, and numerical evidence (with uncertainties) and provide the data products needed to recompute it.
  3. [Sec. 4, Fig. 3] The indirect survival constraint is not translated into the astrophysical parameter space of the putative SMBHB in GSN 069. The scan is presented in (i_in,ini, eps_GR) after marginalizing over a grid of M_e and a_out, but the paper does not state which (M_e, a_out, inclination) combinations are excluded for the observed source, nor does it connect the assumed a_in=300 M• and M•=4e5 M_sun to the posterior constraints from Section 3. The statement that 'the region enclosed by the TDE contour is excluded' holds only under the unproven assumption that the SMO is a surviving solar-type star; without that assumption, the map does not constrain the companion. Please add a projection of the excluded region onto (M_e, a_out) and a discussion of the stellar-survival assumption.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Throughout] Please fix missing spaces in compound terms such as 'in-phasemodulation' and 'anti-phasemodulation'.
  2. [Fig. 1] Define the convention for labeling even/odd eruptions and which recurrence interval belongs to each branch; the in-phase/anti-phase classification depends on this convention.
  3. [Eq. (14)] State explicitly whether the Bayes factor is a natural logarithm and describe the numerical evidence estimate and its uncertainty.
  4. [Fig. 4] Define the parameters a, q_r,ini, q_z,ini, q_phi,ini, theta_min, and sigma_sys in the main text or in a parameter table; the corner plot is not self-contained.
  5. [Data availability] Add a data availability statement specifying where the GSN 069 arrival times, cycle-number list, and analysis code are available; without these, the central result cannot be checked.
  6. [References] Please standardize author names in citations: 'Sniegowska' has a stray leading apostrophe and 'Huang Xiaoshan' appears in text while the reference list uses 'Huang, X.'.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Central timing constraint is data-driven, but the rejection of the competing in-phase detection rests on an unpublished same-group note; mild self-citation load.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 2, footnote 1 (page 2); also referenced in Section 5 summary]
    "In the recent literature, there are claims of an in-phase modulation in recurrence times of even and odd eruptions of GSN 069, which has been interpreted as evidence for a SMBHB. These claims are likely false alarms caused by mismatched cycle number assignment in their O-C analyses as shown by Zhou et al. (2026)."

    This is the paper's only engagement with the published in-phase detection (Miniutti et al. 2025), and the dismissal is delegated to Zhou et al. (2026), a preprint by overlapping authors (C. Zhou and Z. Pan). The note's cycle-number analysis is not reproduced or summarized, and no arrival-time table or cycle-number list is provided. Since the null result in Eq. (13) and the Bayes factor in Eq. (14) are defined on the O-C residuals whose even/odd branch assignment is exactly what the note defends, this step of the argument carries a load that reduces to an unverified self-citation rather than to an independently presented calculation. The central A0 posterior is nevertheless computed from the data, so the paper is not fully circular.

full rationale

The derivation of the in-phase modulation (Eq. 8) is a parameter-free light-travel-time model for a circular outer SMBHB orbit, and the constraint A0 < 254 M• (Eq. 13) with log Bayes factor -3.31 (Eq. 14) comes from a Bayesian fit to the GSN 069 timing data under the stated priors (Eq. 11). The base timing model and priors are adopted from the same group's published work (Zhou et al. 2025b), but the essential comparison is a likelihood-based model comparison, not a restatement of that prior result. The survival maps in Sec. 4 are independent dynamical integrations with stated equations and parameters, and their TDE boundary is insensitive to the assumed initial eccentricity. The only circularity-relevant step is the footnote dismissal of the competing in-phase detection via an unpublished same-group note; this is a load-bearing self-citation for the paper's treatment of contradictory literature, but the central quantitative claim has independent data content. No equations are equivalent by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Accordingly the circularity score is moderate-low (4), reflecting self-citation rather than definitional circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The direct probe introduces three free parameters (A0, omega, Delta_Phi_0) plus the existing timing-model parameters and noise. The indirect probe depends on hand-chosen a_in, e_in,ini, M, and stellar parameters. No new physical entities are postulated. The key assumptions are the EMRI+disk model, circular outer orbit, test-particle limit, and the secular dynamics equations.

free parameters (8)
  • A0 (projected light-travel amplitude) = 113.51 +209.27 -106.40 M (posterior; 95% upper limit 254 M)
    Central parameter of the direct probe; its posterior is the main result.
  • omega (SMBHB angular frequency) = Weakly constrained (corner plot shows order 10^5 M^-1)
    New timing-model parameter; prior U[0, 1e-4] M^-1, posterior mostly unconstrained.
  • Delta_Phi_0 (initial phase offset) = 3.84 +2.23 -3.43 rad
    New timing-model parameter; posterior weakly constrained.
  • sigma_sys (jitter / systematic timing noise) = 187.26 +375.92 -177.94 s
    Fitted noise term that absorbs unmodeled timing scatter; affects the significance of A0.
  • e (EMRI eccentricity) = 0.04 +0.02 -0.02
    Fitted in the timing model; sets the anti-phase amplitude that must be separated from any in-phase signal.
  • T_obt (orbital period) = 64736.59 +19.38 -24.34 s
    Fitted in the timing model; combined with apsidal period to infer M.
  • a_in (inner orbital semi-major axis for survival map) = 300 M
    Chosen by hand as 'motivated by the typical orbital scale of GSN 069' (Sec. 4); directly sets the TDE boundary location in the survival maps.
  • e_in,ini (initial inner eccentricity for survival map) = 0.01 and 1e-5
    Chosen by hand; the low-eccentricity contour e_in,max = 0.04 depends appreciably on this choice, as the authors note.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption QPEs in GSN 069 are produced by an EMRI repeatedly crossing an accretion disk, with two eruptions per orbital period.
    Section 2 and throughout; the timing method and the light-travel-time interpretation require the EMRI+disk model rather than accretion-disk instability or other models.
  • domain assumption The anti-phase recurrence pattern is caused by apsidal precession of a mildly eccentric EMRI orbit.
    Section 2, Eqs. (1)-(3); used to infer M and to distinguish the SMBHB in-phase signal.
  • domain assumption The SMBHB outer orbit is circular, so the projected modulation amplitude A0 = A_CM sin(theta_obs,CM) fully captures the geometry.
    Section 3, first paragraph; an eccentric outer orbit would introduce higher harmonics and additional parameters.
  • domain assumption For the survival maps, the inner companion is treated as a test particle and the outer orbit as circular.
    Section 4; the test-particle limit ignores the stellar mass back-reaction on the inner orbit, standard in ZLK studies, but approximate for a 1 solar mass star.
  • standard math The secular single-averaged equations with octupole terms and 1PN precession (Liu and Lai 2018; Huang et al. 2026) correctly capture the maximum eccentricity over 1000 t_ZLK.
    Appendix B; relied on for the survival map and TDE boundary.
  • standard math A solar-type star is tidally disrupted at r_TDE = R_star (M/m_star)^{1/3}.
    Eq. (16); standard tidal-disruption radius, used to define the excluded region.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of No evidence for a supermassive black hole binary in GSN 069." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SA2NTPO7

@misc{pith2026260805534,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: No evidence for a supermassive black hole binary in GSN 069},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SA2NTPO7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05534}
}
read the original abstract

Quasi-periodic eruptions (QPEs) are recurrent soft X-ray flares from galactic nuclei and provide a new time-domain probe of stellar-mass objects (SMOs) orbiting supermassive black holes (SMBHs). In an extreme-mass-ratio inspiral (EMRI) system interacting with an accretion disk, QPEs are produced when the SMO repeatedly crosses an accretion disk, so that the eruption times trace the orbital motion of the EMRI. We investigate whether such timing information can be used to probe a more distant SMBH companion. We develop two complementary diagnostics: (1) the motion of the EMRI host SMBH around the SMBH-binary (SMBHB) center of mass induces a light-travel-time modulation in the observed QPE arrival times, specifically an \emph{in-phase} modulation in arrival times of even and odd eruptions; (2) if the QPE source contains a surviving stellar orbiter, the external SMBH must not drive the SMO into tidal disruption through eccentricity excitation by the von Zeipel--Lidov--Kozai (ZLK) mechanism. Using GSN 069 as an example, we find \emph{no} in-phase modulation in the QPE timing (i.e., no evidence for a SMBHB) and constrain the excluded parameter space of the companion SMBH. These results demonstrate that QPE timing and stellar survival offer complementary routes for constraining otherwise hidden SMBH companions in nearby galactic nuclei.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05534 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Time intervals between adjacent eruptions of GSN 069 (Miniutti et al. 2019). There are clearly two anti-phase branches, denoted as Teven(t) and Todd(t), where both of them vary with a period ≈ 76 d, while the sum Teven(t) + Todd(t) ≈ 65 ks (Zhou et al. 2025a,b). Tagawa & Haiman 2023; Zhou et al. 2024a,b; Yao et al. 2024; Liu et al. 2026; Jankovic, T. et al. ˇ 2026; Huang, S. et al. 2026; Chen et al. 2026). In this w… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic plot of an EMRI system perturbed by an ex￾ternal SMBH Me as the tertiary in the system. The tertiary SMBH Me forms a wider SMBHB with M•, causing the EMRI center to move around the C.O.M. and thereby inducing an additional light￾travel-time modulation in the observed QPE arrival times. The EMRI geometry is described in the coordinate system (x, y,z), while the wider SMBHB is described in the C.O.M. coordin… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left: Survival map of a star in the (iin,ini, εGR) plane for a fiducial EMRI configuration motivated by the typical orbital scale of GSN 069. The color indicates the maximum inner orbital eccentricity ein,max reached during the SA evolution including octupole-order terms and 1PN relativistic apsidal precession. The calculation uses M• = 4 × 105 M⊙, ain = 300 M•, ein,ini = 0.01, and a circular outer orbit with eout =… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Corner plot of the posterior distributions inferred from the GSN 069 QPE timing data. The sampled parameters are p[M•], e, cos θmin, qr,ini, qz,ini, qϕ,ini, Tobt[sec], a, T˙ obt, A0[M•], ω[M−1 • ], ∆Φ0, θobs,eff, σsys[sec]. The parameters A0, ω, and ∆Φ0 char￾acterize t…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of ˙ωtide and ˙ωGR as a function of ein. The vertical dashed line marks ein = 0.711, which corresponds to the TDE boundary for ain = 300 M• in this work. The horizontal red dotted line indicates ˙ωtide = ω˙ GR. REFERENCES Allievi, C. M., Broggi, L., Sesana, …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and Saxton, R

    Miniutti, G. and Saxton, R. D. and Giustini, M. and Alexander, K. D. and Fender, R. P. and Heywood, I. and Monageng, I. and Coriat, M. and Tzioumis, A. K. and Read, A. M. and Knigge, C. and Gandhi, P. and Pretorius, M. L. and Ag. Nine-hour X-ray quasi-periodic eruptions from a low-mass black hole galactic nucleus , journal =. 2019 , volume =. doi:10.1038/...

    doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1556-x 2019

  2. [2]

    Relativistic treatment of extreme mass ratio inspirals crossing accretion disks

    Zeng, Yuhe and Pan, Zhen. Relativistic treatment of extreme mass ratio inspirals crossing accretion disks. Phys. Rev. D. 2026. doi:10.1103/fxnd-r4bs. arXiv:2601.11925

    arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    QPEs from Warped Disk Collisions with EMRIs: Brightness-Recurrence Diagram and Gravitational-Wave Follow-up

    Chen, Bo-An and others. QPEs from Warped Disk Collisions with EMRIs: Brightness-Recurrence Diagram and Gravitational-Wave Follow-up. 2026. arXiv:2605.24905

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

  4. [4]

    and Giustini, M

    Miniutti, G. and Giustini, M. and Arcodia, R. and Saxton, R. D. and Read, A. M. and Bianchi, S. and Alexander, K. D. , year=. Repeating tidal disruptions in GSN 069: Long-term evolution and constraints on quasi-periodic eruptions’ models , volume=. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244512 , journal=

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244512

  5. [5]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , abstract =

    Xian, Jingtao and Zhang, Fupeng and Dou, Liming and He, Jiasheng and Shu, Xinwen , title =. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , abstract =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac31aa , url =

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac31aa 2021

  6. [6]

    Probing orbits of stellar mass objects deep in galactic nuclei with quasiperiodic eruptions , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.103031 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.103031 2024

  7. [7]

    Probing orbits of stellar mass objects deep in galactic nuclei with quasiperiodic eruptions. II. Population analysis , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.083019 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.083019 2024

  8. [8]

    The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =

    Zhou, Cong and Zeng, Yuhe and Pan, Zhen , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adcee2 , url =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adcee2 2025

Show all 78 references
  1. [9]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Zhou, Cong and Pan, Zhen and Jiang, Ning and Zhao, Wen , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1580 , url =

    2025 doi

  2. [10]

    2026 , eprint=

    Quasi-periodic Eruptions from Stellar-mass Black Holes Impacting Accretion Disks in Galactic Nuclei , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  3. [11]

    2026 , eprint=

    Resolving Oblique Star-Disk Collisions in Quasi-Periodic Eruptions: Numerical Requirements and the Importance of Geometry , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  4. [12]

    2026 , month =

    Resolving Oblique Star–Disk Collisions in Quasiperiodic Eruptions: Numerical Requirements and the Importance of Geometry , journal =. 2026 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae78d4 , url =

    2026 doi

  5. [13]

    , year = 1962, month = nov, volume =

    Secular perturbations of asteroids with high inclination and eccentricity. , year = 1962, month = nov, volume =. doi:10.1086/108790 , adsurl =

    1962 doi

  6. [14]

    1962 , issn =

    The evolution of orbits of artificial satellites of planets under the action of gravitational perturbations of external bodies , journal =. 1962 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(62)90129-0 , url =

    1962 doi

  7. [15]

    The Eccentric Kozai-Lidov Effect and Its Applications

    Naoz, Smadar. The Eccentric Kozai-Lidov Effect and Its Applications. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023315

    2016 doi

  8. [16]

    and Lai, Dong , title =

    Liu, Bin and Muñoz, Diego J. and Lai, Dong , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2396 , url =

    2015 doi

  9. [17]

    2026 , month =

    Limiting Eccentricity in Restricted Hierarchical Three-body Systems with Short-range Forces , journal =. 2026 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae3e8a , url =

    2026 doi

  10. [18]

    Ivanov, P. B. and Polnarev, A. G. and Saha, P. , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2005 , month =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08843.x , url =

    2005

  11. [19]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Mazzolari, Giovanni and Bonetti, Matteo and Sesana, Alberto and Colombo, Riccardo M and Dotti, Massimo and Lodato, Giuseppe and Izquierdo-Villalba, David , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2255 , url =

    2022 doi

  12. [20]

    , title =

    Giustini, Margherita and Miniutti, Giovanni and Saxton, Richard D. , title =. Astronomy & Astrophysics , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037610 , url =

    doi

  13. [21]

    and Merloni, A

    Arcodia, R. and Merloni, A. and Nandra, K. and Buchner, J. and Salvato, M. and Pasham, D. and Remillard, R. and Comparat, J. and Lamer, G. and Ponti, G. and Malyali, A. and Wolf, J. and Arzoumanian, Z. and Bogensberger, D. and Buckley, D. A. H. and Gendreau, K. and Gromadzki, ...

    doi

  14. [22]

    and Giustini, M

    Miniutti, G. and Giustini, M. and Arcodia, R. and Saxton, R. D. and Chakraborty, J. and Read, A. M. and Kara, E. , title =. Astronomy & Astrophysics , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346653 , url =

    doi

  15. [23]

    Giustini, Margherita and Miniutti, Giovanni and Arcodia, Riccardo and Goodwin, Adelle and Alexander, Kate D. and Chakraborty, Joheen and Buchner, Johannes and Kosec, Peter and Saxton, Richard and Bonetti, Matteo and Franchini, Alessia and Ryu, Taeho and Shu, Xinwen and Kara, E...

    doi

  16. [24]

    and Pasham, D

    Nicholl, M. and Pasham, D. R. and Mummery, A. and Guolo, M. and Gendreau, K. and Dewangan, G. C. and Ferrara, E. C. and Remillard, R. and Bonnerot, C. and Chakraborty, J. and Hajela, A. and Dhillon, V. S. and Gillan, A. F. and Greenwood, J. and Huber, M. E. and Janiuk, A. and ...

  17. [25]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , abstract =

    Chakraborty, Joheen and Kara, Erin and Arcodia, Riccardo and Buchner, Johannes and Giustini, Margherita and Hernández-García, Lorena and Linial, Itai and Masterson, Megan and Miniutti, Giovanni and Mummery, Andrew and Panagiotou, Christos and Quintin, Erwan and Sánchez-Sáez, P...

    2025 doi

  18. [26]

    and Eracleous, Michael and Haggard, Daryl and Runnoe, Jessie C

    Gilbert, Olivier and Ruan, John J. and Eracleous, Michael and Haggard, Daryl and Runnoe, Jessie C. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1745 , url =

    2025 doi

  19. [27]

    2025 , eprint=

    Using Infrared Dust Echoes to Identify Bright Quasi-periodic Eruption Sources , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  20. [28]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , abstract =

    Jiang, Ning and Pan, Zhen , title =. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , abstract =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adc456 , url =

    2025 doi

  21. [29]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    King, Andrew , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1641 , url =

    2022 doi

  22. [30]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , abstract =

    Pan, Xin and Li, Shuang-Liang and Cao, Xinwu and Miniutti, Giovanni and Gu, Minfeng , title =. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , abstract =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac5faf , url =

    2022 doi

  23. [31]

    The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =

    Pan, Xin and Li, Shuang-Liang and Cao, Xinwu , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd180 , url =

    2023 doi

  24. [33]

    , title =

    Vurm, Indrek and Linial, Itai and Metzger, Brian D. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb74d , url =

    2025 doi

  25. [34]

    and Quataert, Eliot and Jiang, Yan-Fei and Lu, Wenbin and White, Christopher J

    Yao, Philippe Z. and Quataert, Eliot and Jiang, Yan-Fei and Lu, Wenbin and White, Christopher J. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8911 , url =

    2024 doi

  26. [35]

    2025 , month =

    Multiband Emission from Star–Disk Collisions and Implications for Quasiperiodic Eruptions , journal =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae07ca , url =

    2025 doi

  27. [36]

    and Bonetti, Matteo and Franchini, Alessia and Kejriwal, Shubham and Miniutti, Giovanni and Arcodia, Riccardo and Hughes, Scott A

    Chakraborty, Joheen and Drummond, Lisa V. and Bonetti, Matteo and Franchini, Alessia and Kejriwal, Shubham and Miniutti, Giovanni and Arcodia, Riccardo and Hughes, Scott A. and Duque, Francisco and Kara, Erin and Sesana, Alberto and Giustini, Margherita and Motta, Amedeo and B...

    2025 doi

  28. [37]

    The quest for dual and binary supermassive black holes: A multi-messenger view , journal =

    Alessandra. The quest for dual and binary supermassive black holes: A multi-messenger view , journal =. 2019 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newar.2020.101525 , url =

    2019

  29. [38]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Charisi, Maria and Taylor, Stephen R and Runnoe, Jessie and Bogdanovic, Tamara and Trump, Jonathan R , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3713 , url =

    2022 doi

  30. [39]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Suzuguchi, Tomoya and Matsumoto, Tatsuya , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2026 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2243 , url =

    2026 doi

  31. [40]

    Evolution of quasi-periodic eruptions in the post-tidal disruption event accretion disk perturbed by an orbiting star , journal =

    Mondek, Martin and Zaja. Evolution of quasi-periodic eruptions in the post-tidal disruption event accretion disk perturbed by an orbiting star , journal =. 2026 , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202558531 , url =

    2026 doi

  32. [41]

    2026 , eprint=

    Extreme Mass Ratio Inspirals in Light of Quasi-periodic Eruptions: Milli-Hertz Gravitational Wave Background , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  33. [42]

    , title =

    Linial, Itai and Metzger, Brian D. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acf65b , url =

    2023 doi

  34. [43]

    and Pasham, D

    Wevers, T. and Pasham, D. R. and Jalan, P. and Rakshit, S. and Arcodia, R. , title =. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  35. [44]

    Discovery of Extreme Quasi-Periodic Eruptions in a Newly Accreting Massive Black Hole , journal =

    Hern. Discovery of Extreme Quasi-Periodic Eruptions in a Newly Accreting Massive Black Hole , journal =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  36. [45]

    and Liu, Z

    Arcodia, R. and Liu, Z. and Merloni, A. and Malyali, A. and Rau, A. and Chakraborty, J. and Goodwin, A. and Buckley, D. and Brink, J. and Gromadzki, M. and Arzoumanian, Z. and Buchner, J. and Kara, E. and Nandra, K. and Ponti, G. and Salvato, M. and Anderson, G. and Baldini, P...

    2024

  37. [46]

    and Caplan, Matt E

    Bellinger, Earl P. and Caplan, Matt E. and Ryu, Taeho and Bollimpalli, Deepika and Ball, Warrick H. and Kühnel, Florian and Farmer, R. and de Mink, S. E. and Christensen-Dalsgaard, Jørgen , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/...

    2023 doi

  38. [47]

    2020 , month = sep, volume =

    Possible mechanism for multiple changing-look phenomena in active galactic nuclei , journal =. 2020 , month = sep, volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038575 , url =

    2020 doi

  39. [48]

    and Blandford, Roger , title =

    Dai, Lixin and Fuerst, Steven V. and Blandford, Roger , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , year =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16038.x , url =

    2009

  40. [49]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters , year =

    King, Andrew , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters , year =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaa020 , url =

    doi

  41. [50]

    10.1051/0004-6361:20031537

    X-ray flares from Sgr A*: Star-disk interactions? , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361:20031537", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20031537", journal =

    doi

  42. [51]

    and Nixon, C

    Raj, A. and Nixon, C. J. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abdc25 , url =

    2021 doi

  43. [52]

    The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =

    MacLeod, Morgan and Ramirez-Ruiz, Enrico and Grady, Sean and Guillochon, James , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2013 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/777/2/133 , url =

    2013 doi

  44. [53]

    and Clarke, C

    Syer, D. and Clarke, C. J. and Rees, M. J. , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , year =. doi:10.1093/mnras/250.3.505 , url =

    doi

  45. [54]

    10.1051/0004-6361/202243828

    Modified models of radiation pressure instability applied to 10, 105, and 107 M⊙ accreting black holes , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/202243828", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243828", journal =

    doi

  46. [55]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Kaur, Karamveer and Stone, Nicholas C and Gilbaum, Shmuel , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1894 , url =

    2023 doi

  47. [56]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Lu, Wenbin and Quataert, Eliot , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2203 , url =

    2023 doi

  48. [57]

    10.1051/0004-6361/202346565

    Quasi-periodic eruptions from impacts between the secondary and a rigidly precessing accretion disc in an extreme mass-ratio inspiral system , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/202346565", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346565", journal =

    doi

  49. [58]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Tagawa, Hiromichi and Haiman, Zoltán , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2616 , url =

    2023 doi

  50. [59]

    10.1051/0004-6361/202659222

    Radiation hydrodynamics of star-disc collisions for quasi-periodic eruptions , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/202659222", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202659222", journal =

    doi

  51. [60]

    2024 , eprint=

    Alive and Strongly Kicking: Stable X-ray Quasi-Periodic Eruptions from eRO-QPE2 over 3.5 Years , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    2024

  52. [61]

    10.1051/0004-6361/202452400

    Eppur si muove: Evidence of disc precession or a sub-milliparsec SMBH binary in the QPE-emitting galaxy GSN 069 , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/202452400", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452400", journal =

    doi

  53. [62]

    and French, K

    Wevers, T. and French, K. D. and Zabludoff, A. I. and Fischer, T. C. and Rowlands, K. and Guolo, M. and Dalla Barba, B. and Arcodia, R. and Berton, M. and Bian, F. and Linial, I. and Miniutti, G. and Pasham, D. R. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , abstract =. 2024...

    2024 doi

  54. [63]

    The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =

    Xiong, Yifei and Jiang, Ning and Pan, Zhen and Hao, Lei and Li, Zhenzhen , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade2d7 , url =

    2025 doi

  55. [64]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , abstract =

    Wu, Mingxin and Jiang, Ning and Zhu, Jiazheng and Luo, Di and Dou, Liming and Wang, Tinggui , title =. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , abstract =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adf229 , url =

    2025 doi

  56. [65]

    and Baldini, P

    Arcodia, R. and Baldini, P. and Merloni, A. and Rau, A. and Nandra, K. and Chakraborty, J. and Goodwin, A. J. and Page, M. J. and Buchner, J. and Masterson, M. and Monageng, I. and Arzoumanian, Z. and Buckley, D. and Kara, E. and Ponti, G. and Ramos-Ceja, M. E. and Salvato, M....

    2025 doi

  57. [66]

    10.1051/0004-6361/202558241

    Discovery of crested quasi-periodic eruptions following the most luminous SRG/eROSITA tidal disruption event , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/202558241", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202558241", journal =

    doi

  58. [67]

    The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =

    Sun, Luming and Shu, Xinwen and Wang, Tinggui , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2013 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/768/2/167 , url =

    2013 doi

  59. [68]

    2026 , eprint=

    Two-body relaxation in the EMRI-TDE disk model for Quasi Periodic Eruptions , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  60. [69]

    Probing formation channels of extreme mass-ratio inspirals , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2026 , month =. doi:10.1103/3gvb-rv11 , url =

    2026 doi

  61. [70]

    2026 , eprint=

    Dynamics in Nuclear Stellar Clusters: The Impact of Collisions and Disrupted Binaries , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  62. [71]

    2026 , eprint=

    Multimessenger prospects of quasi-periodic eruptions , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  63. [72]

    Formation rate of extreme mass ratio inspirals in active galactic nuclei , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.103018 , url =

    2021 doi

  64. [73]

    Wet extreme mass ratio inspirals may be more common for spaceborne gravitational wave detection , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.063007 , url =

    2021 doi

  65. [74]

    10.1051/0004-6361/202348949

    Cosmic hide and seek: The volumetric rate of X-ray quasi-periodic eruptions , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/202348949", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348949", journal =

    doi

  66. [75]

    2026 , eprint=

    A Note on QPE Timing: False Alarms in O-C , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  67. [76]

    and Talbot, Colm and Ackley, Kendall and Biscoveanu, Sylvia and Chu, Qi and Divakarla, Atul and Easter, Paul J

    Ashton, Gregory and Hübner, Moritz and Lasky, Paul D. and Talbot, Colm and Ackley, Kendall and Biscoveanu, Sylvia and Chu, Qi and Divakarla, Atul and Easter, Paul J. and Goncharov, Boris and Vivanco, Francisco Hernandez and Harms, Jan and Lower, Marcus E. and Meadors, Grant D....

    2019

  68. [77]

    Nested sampling with normalizing flows for gravitational-wave inference , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.103006 , url =

    2021 doi

  69. [78]

    The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =

    Liu, Bin and Lai, Dong , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad09f , url =

    2018 doi

  70. [79]

    Shu, X. W. and Wang, S. S. and Dou, L. M. and Jiang, N. and Wang, J. X. and Wang, T. G. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , abstract =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaba17 , url =

    2018 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.