Pith. sign in

REVIEW

What Predicts Interpersonal Affect? Preliminary Analyses from Retrospective Evaluations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.09378 v1 pith:SB52UDSY submitted 2023-11-15 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords retrospectiveaffectinteractioninterpersonalotherratingsanalyseshuman-robot
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

While the field of affective computing has contributed to greatly improving the seamlessness of human-robot interactions, the focus has primarily been on the emotional processing of the self, rather than the perception of the other. To address this gap, in a user study with 30 participant dyads, we collected the users' retrospective ratings of the interpersonal perception of the other interactant, after a short interaction. We made use of CORAE, a novel web-based open-source tool for COntinuous Retrospective Affect Evaluation. In this work, we analyze how these interpersonal ratings correlate with different aspects of the interaction, namely personality traits, participation balance, and sentiment analysis. Notably, we discovered that conversational imbalance has a significant effect on the retrospective ratings, among other findings. By employing these analyses and methodologies, we lay the groundwork for enhanced human-robot interactions, wherein affect is understood as a highly dynamic and context-dependent outcome of interaction history.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools