Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

MARTA: The connection between chemical enrichment, feedback, and dust in a Wolf-Rayet galaxy at z${\sim}$2

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In a galaxy at cosmic noon, Wolf-Rayet stars free iron from dust without changing the global abundance pattern.

desk verdict A genuinely new WR-bump detection and Te-based Fe/O at z~2, with a plausible but fragile Fe-enhancement interpretation that hinges on ICF and dust-depletion corrections. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.06622 v3 pith:SBFLLRLJ submitted 2025-09-08 astro-ph.GA

Mirko Curti , Elisa Cataldi , Francesco Belfiore , Bianca Moreschini , Magda Arnaboldi , Martyna Chruślińska , Filippo Mannucci , Alessandro Marconi
show 12 more authors
Quirino D'Amato Stefano Carniani William M. Baker Annalisa De Cia Nimisha Kumari Amirnezam Amiri Giovanni Cresci Chiaki Kobayashi Fergus Cullen Anna Feltre Roberto Maiolino Irene Shivaei
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxies:high-redshiftevolutionabundancesstars:Wolf-RayetJWST/NIRSpecspectroscopyironabundancedustdepletiongalacticoutflows
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

MARTA-4327 is a star-forming galaxy seen when the Universe was roughly three billion years old, and this paper reports one of the highest-redshift detections of the broad spectral 'blue' and 'red' bumps that signal Wolf-Rayet stars in an unlensed galaxy. Using deep JWST/NIRSpec spectra and the electron-temperature ('direct') method, the authors measure abundances of oxygen, nitrogen, neon, argon, sulfur, helium, and—for one of the first times at this redshift—iron, asking whether these short-lived, very massive stars measurably alter the surrounding interstellar medium. The answer is split: nitrogen, neon, and argon ratios match local galaxies of the same metallicity, so the Wolf-Rayet imprint on global chemical enrichment is minimal, but the gas-phase iron-to-oxygen ratio sits above the local trend. The authors interpret the excess iron as the signature of dust grains destroyed in the Wolf-Rayet-driven environment, releasing depleted iron back into the gas, and they connect this to a young ($\sim$5–6 Myr), nitrogen-type Wolf-Rayet population, a modest ionized outflow, and an O I $\lambda$8446 line excited in dense neutral clumps.

What carries the argument

The chain that carries the central claim converts measured emission lines into a statement about dust. First, a Bayesian MCMC fit simultaneously solves for electron temperature $T_e$, density $n_e$, extinction $A_V$, and dust covering fraction $f_{\rm cov}$ against hydrogen Balmer/Paschen ratios, auroral-to-nebular ratios ([O III] $\lambda$4363/$\lambda$5007, [O II] $\lambda$7325/$\lambda$3727) and the [S II] $\lambda$6718/$\lambda$6732 density diagnostic, using a non-unity covering-fraction dust model. Second, the 'direct' $T_e$ method turns dust-corrected line ratios into ionic abundances, with the iron abundance from [Fe III] $\lambda$4658 relative to [O II] $\lambda$3727, corrected by the ionization correction factor ICF(Fe). Third—the load-bearing step for the headline result—Equation 1 of Méndez-Delgado et al. (2024) converts gas-phase Fe/O to total Fe/O by fixing the depleted fraction $\mathrm{Fe_{dust}/Fe_{total}} = 0.65$ from the gas-phase N/H abundance. On the stellar side, BPASS v2.2.1 single bursts and empirical Wolf-Rayet templates date the burst at $\sim$5–6 Myr and identify it as WN-dominated, while blue/red-bump equivalent-width diagrams exclude very massive stars; the same young population is then the natural agent of the local dust destruction invoked to explain the iron excess.

What would settle it

Measure the galaxy's dust content directly, for example with ALMA millimeter continuum to derive its dust-to-metal ratio: the dust-destruction interpretation predicts a dust-to-metal ratio below that of non-Wolf-Rayet galaxies at the same metallicity, whereas the alternative iron-enrichment scenarios predict a normal dust content. The paper itself identifies ALMA as the discriminator. A second check is spectroscopic: if deeper data resolve additional iron ionization stages and show that the assumed ionization-correction factor is wrong, or if rest-UV spectra reveal strong He II $\lambda$1640 and P-Cygni profiles typical of very massive stars, the stellar-population and iron-enhancement interpretation would need revision.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the gas-phase iron-to-oxygen ratio in MARTA-4327 is enhanced relative to local star-forming nebulae at the same oxygen abundance, and that this enhancement is best explained by reduced iron depletion onto dust rather than by an unusual nucleosynthetic enrichment pattern. From the [Fe III] $\lambda$4658 and [O II] $\lambda$3727 lines, with a temperature-based ionization correction, the authors derive $\log(\mathrm{Fe/O})_{\rm gas} = -2.07^{+0.14}_{-0.15}$ (including systematics), placing the galaxy in the upper envelope of the local reference distribution; a similar offset is shown by essentially every comparison system with Wolf-Rayet signatures, from local Wolf-Rayet galaxies to the lensed Sunburst Arc at $z \approx 2.37$. Applying a dust-depletion scaling calibrated on local nebulae, which sets $\mathrm{Fe_{dust}/Fe_{total}} = 0.65$, the total abundance becomes $\log(\mathrm{Fe/O})_{\rm total} = -1.61 \pm 0.22$, i.e. $[\mathrm{O/Fe}] = 0.38 \pm 0.22$—an $\alpha$-element enhancement of roughly $2.4\times$ solar if the gas composition tracks the young stellar population. Because N/O, Ne/O, and Ar/O all agree with local abundance patterns, the Wolf-Rayet population's chemical impact is argued to be strongly localized, and the elevated Fe/O is attributed to dust destruction (or partial destruction) in the winds and radiation fields of the young massive stars. The corrected Fe/O value places MARTA-4327 on the [O/Fe]–sSFR relation, a position the authors note formally favors relatively short ($\sim$40 Myr) minimum delay times for Type Ia supernovae.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that iron depletes onto dust in MARTA-4327 according to the same nitrogen-based scaling calibrated on local nebulae, which fixes 65% of the iron as locked in grains; if dust in this galaxy's interstellar medium depletes iron more or less effectively, the claimed iron enhancement, the value $[\mathrm{O/Fe}] = 0.38 \pm 0.22$, and the agreement with the [O/Fe]-sSFR relation would all change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the iron excess is real, Wolf-Rayet populations at $z \sim 2$ can locally modify the interstellar medium's iron content and dust properties without leaving a trace in the global N/O, Ne/O, or Ar/O ratios.
  • Te-based iron measurements in individual high-redshift galaxies can constrain Type Ia supernova delay-time distributions: the corrected Fe/O of MARTA-4327 sits on the [O/Fe]–sSFR relation in the regime favoring a short ($\sim$40 Myr) minimum delay time.
  • The detection of the Wolf-Rayet blue and red bumps in an unlensed $z = 2.224$ galaxy shows that deep NIRSpec spectroscopy can catch these short-lived massive-star signatures in ordinary galaxies at cosmic noon, giving stellar-population models a new benchmark.
  • The broad, blueshifted H$\alpha$ component implies an ionized outflow with mass loading factor $\eta \approx 0.16$–$0.27$, inside the star-formation-driven regime and unlikely on its own to unbind the galaxy's gas; the multi-phase outflow rate could be larger.
  • If O I $\lambda$8446 traces Ly$\beta$ fluorescence or collisional excitation in dense clumps, the same dense neutral structures could host the dust destruction and the localized iron enrichment, tying the outflow, the O I line, and the iron excess into one picture.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If reduced dust depletion in Wolf-Rayet environments is a general phenomenon, gas-phase Fe/O at fixed O/H could serve as a practical tracer of recent dust destruction in high-redshift galaxies, complementing direct dust-continuum measurements—a use the paper hints at but does not develop.
  • The dust-destruction scenario predicts that MARTA-4327 has a dust-to-metal ratio below that of non-Wolf-Rayet galaxies at the same metallicity and specific star-formation rate; ALMA observations, which the paper calls for, would test this directly.
  • The result is a single-object measurement, so the striking pattern that every Wolf-Rayet system in the comparison shows elevated gas-phase Fe/O suggests a selection or physics worth testing on a sample of $z \sim 2$ galaxies with and without Wolf-Rayet features.
  • Because the N/H-based depletion correction is the fragile step, an independent calibration route would compare gas-phase Fe/O from emission lines with stellar iron abundance from the rest-UV and optical continuum in the same galaxy, bypassing the local-nebula scaling.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents deep JWST/NIRSpec MSA spectroscopy of MARTA-4327, a star-forming galaxy at z=2.224, reporting detections of the Wolf-Rayet blue and red bumps, multiple Te-based elemental abundances (N/O, Ne/O, S/O, Ar/O, Fe/O), a broad H-alpha outflow component, and O I 8446 emission. The abundance analysis finds that N/O, Ne/O, and Ar/O are consistent with local Te-based samples, while the gas-phase Fe/O ratio appears enhanced relative to local nebulae of similar metallicity. This is interpreted as evidence for reduced Fe depletion onto dust, possibly caused by dust destruction in WR-driven environments. After applying a local dust-depletion correction, the total Fe/O yields [O/Fe]=0.38 and places the galaxy on the [O/Fe] versus sSFR relation. The paper also reports an ionized outflow with mass-loading factor ~0.2 and discusses possible excitation mechanisms for O I 8446.

Significance. If the Fe/O result holds, this is one of the first Te-based gas-phase iron measurements at z~2 and a potentially important link between WR populations, dust processing, and ISM enrichment at Cosmic Noon. The data processing and abundance analysis are generally careful: multiple auroral lines are used, the Te/ne/AV/fcov parameters are derived in a simultaneous MCMC framework, and the hydrogen-line dust modeling includes a non-unity covering fraction. The WR blue-bump analysis and the O I 8446 detection are valuable in their own right. However, the central Fe enhancement claim currently rests on a single line plus an ICF and a temperature assignment whose uncertainties are comparable to the claimed offset, and the total Fe/O value additionally depends on a local dust-depletion calibration. The paper also contains internal inconsistencies in reported values. The manuscript is an important observational benchmark, but the headline Fe interpretation needs to be either made quantitatively robust or substantially reframed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sect. 4.3.3, Fig. 6] The claim that log(Fe/O)_gas = -2.07 is enhanced relative to local nebulae is not statistically secure. M4327 lies at the upper envelope of the DESIRED distribution, and the offset from the local trend is comparable to the quoted systematic uncertainty of about 0.15 dex. The value is derived from the single [FeIII]4658 line, using the Rodriguez & Rubin (2005) ICF and T_e[OII] = 12260 K. The manuscript itself notes that Fe ICFs are affected by large scatter, yet the added 30% relative uncertainty is an ad hoc assignment. A shift of roughly 0.1-0.2 dex in the ICF or in the temperature assigned to the Fe++ zone would bring M4327 into agreement with the local relation and erase the reduced-depletion interpretation. Please quantify the significance of the offset (e.g., the residual relative to the DESIRED fit including its intrinsic scatter) and provide a sensitivity analysis over alternative ICF prescriptions and plausible T_e[Fe++] choices.
  2. [Sect. 4.3.3, Fig. 10] The conversion from gas-phase to total Fe/O and the resulting [O/Fe]=0.38 rely on Fe_dust/Fe_total=0.65 from Equation 1 of Mendez-Delgado et al. (2024), a calibration based on local nebulae and tying depletion to N/H. Applying this calibration to a z~2 WR galaxy is an external assumption, and it is in tension with the paper's own hypothesis that the WR environment has reduced Fe depletion. If the true depletion fraction is lower, the inferred total Fe/O and [O/Fe] change, and the agreement with the [O/Fe]-sSFR relation in Fig. 10 is not independent evidence for the Fe abundance. The [O/Fe] result should be presented as conditional on the adopted local depletion scaling, and the paper should discuss how the conclusion shifts under a plausible range of Fe_dust/Fe_total values.
  3. [Table 1 vs. Sect. 4.3] There are internal inconsistencies between values quoted in the text and in Table 1 that must be resolved. Section 4.3.2 states y+ = 0.085 +/- 0.002, while Table 1 lists y+ = 0.074 +/- 0.004; the reported helium mass fraction Y = 0.253 corresponds to the former value. Similarly, log(S/O) is -1.74 in the text but -1.71 in Table 1, and log(Fe/N)_gas is -0.98 in the text but -0.93 in Table 1. In addition, Table 1's footnote reports a 20% relative uncertainty on the ICF, whereas the text specifies 30% for the Fe++ ICF and a further 20% for the dust-depletion correction. These discrepancies affect the quantitative reliability of the paper and need to be reconciled.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sect. 3.2 and Abstract] The red bump detection is marginal: the EW is 6 +/- 3 A for the 5780-5850 A range and 12 +/- 4 A for the extended 5730-5850 A range, so the 2-3 sigma significance should be stated explicitly. The abstract's unqualified phrase 'detections of the WR blue and red bumps' is stronger than the evidence, even though the blue bump is robust.
  2. [Sect. 4.3.3, footnote 6] The footnote says a further 20% uncertainty is applied to the dust depletion correction, but the main text says 30% on the ICF and the table note says 20% on the ICF; please make the error budget consistent and clearly separate the ICF and depletion terms.
  3. [Sect. 5.1.1] There is a typo in 'the strength of the nitroegn emission' (nitrogen), and the phrase 'firsts' in the abstract and Sect. 5.4 should be 'first detections.'
  4. [Sect. 4.3.3] The reference to 'Equation 1 from Mendez-Delgado et al. (2024)' is ambiguous because the reference list contains both an A&A 690, A248 paper and an arXiv:2410.17381 paper; please specify which one is used for the depletion scaling.
  5. [Sect. 5.3] The outflow mass-loading factor is explicitly a lower limit based on the ionized phase, and the sensitivity to R_out and n_e is acknowledged; a sentence noting that the quoted eta values are conditional on the assumed fcov dust model would help the reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Fe/O enhancement, WR burst age, and outflow properties are derived from independent observed line ratios and external calibrations, not from the conclusions.

full rationale

I traced the paper's main derivation chains and found no step in which a target result is assumed as an input. The Te-based oxygen abundance is obtained from observed auroral-to-nebular ratios ([OIII]4363/5007 and [OII]7325/3727) through an MCMC forward model (Sect. 4.2), and element ratios including N/O, Ne/O, Ar/O, and S/O follow from independent line ratios with standard ICFs (Sect. 4.3.1). The gas-phase Fe/O is derived from [FeIII]4658/[OII]3728 with the Rodríguez & Rubin (2005) ICF, explicitly including an added 30% systematic on the ICF (Sect. 4.3.3); this is a measurement, not a fitted prediction. The dust-depletion correction to total Fe/O uses Equation 1 of Méndez-Delgado et al. (2024), an external calibration from local nebulae, and the paper states the resulting [O/Fe] uncertainty of 0.22. The WR burst age is a model comparison result: BPASS and Crowther et al. (2023) templates are fitted to the observed HeII and bump EWs (Sect. 5.1.1), and the age is not used to construct the Fe/O abundance. The [O/Fe]-sSFR comparison in Sect. 5.2.3 invokes the relation from Chruślińska et al. (2024), a co-author's prior work, but that relation is used only for interpretation and does not enter the measured abundances. Self-citations such as Cataldi et al. (2025) for the pipeline and Chruślińska et al. (2024) for the sSFR relation are present but are not load-bearing; the central claims rest on the new NIRSpec detections and external calibrations. Therefore the paper shows no circularity by construction, and the minor self-citations do not warrant a score above 1.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The Fe/O enhancement claim rests on a chain of model-dependent corrections: the Reddy et al. (2025) partial-covering dust model (A_V and f_cov fitted in MCMC), the Rodriguez & Rubin (2005) ICF for Fe++, and a dust-depletion correction calibrated on local nebulae. The outflow claim assumes a geometry with R_out = 1 kpc. Standard assumptions include Case B recombination and the Cardelli extinction curve.

free parameters (7)
  • ne (electron density) = 80 (+50, -40) cm^-3
    Fitted in MCMC from [SII] doublet and included in all abundance and outflow calculations.
  • Te[OII] = 12260 (+480, -520) K
    Fitted in MCMC; used for O+, N+, S+ abundances and Fe++/O+.
  • Te[OIII] = 11430 (+150, -160) K
    Fitted in MCMC; used for O++, Ne++, Ar++, S++ abundances.
  • A_V = 1.53 (+0.15, -0.16) mag
    Fitted under partial-covering dust model; controls extinction correction of all line ratios.
  • f_cov = 0.74 +/- 0.01
    Dust covering fraction fitted in MCMC; strongly affects reddening and inferred temperatures.
  • Fe_dust/Fe_total = 0.65
    Adopted from Mendez-Delgado et al. (2024) Eq. 1 to convert gas-phase Fe/O to total Fe/O.
  • R_out = 1 kpc (assumed)
    Assumed outflow radius; scales mass outflow rate and mass loading factor.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Case B recombination for H and He line emissivities.
    Assumed in Sect 4.2 and 4.3.2 for hydrogen and helium line modeling.
  • standard math Cardelli et al. (1989) extinction curve with RV=3.1.
    Adopted in Sect 4.1 for all dust attenuation corrections.
  • domain assumption BPASS v2.2.1 stellar templates (Chabrier IMF, M_up=300 Msun, Z=0.2 Zsun, [alpha/Fe]=0.4) represent the stellar population.
    Used in Sect 5.1.1 to infer burst age and WR composition; authors note templates fail on N features.
  • domain assumption Rodriguez & Rubin (2005) ICF for Fe++ from O++/O+.
    Used in Sect 4.3.3 to correct unseen Fe ionization states.
  • domain assumption Reddy et al. (2025) partial-covering dust model describes the Balmer/Paschen discrepancy.
    Adopted in Sect 4.1 over the simpler uniform-screen model.
  • domain assumption Mendez-Delgado et al. (2024) Fe depletion vs N/H relation applies to M4327.
    Used in Sect 4.3.3 to infer Fe_dust/Fe_total = 0.65.
  • domain assumption Outflow is conical, steady, with R_out = 1 kpc.
    Assumed in Sect 5.3 to compute mass outflow rate.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of MARTA: The connection between chemical enrichment, feedback, and dust in a Wolf-Rayet galaxy at z${\sim}$2." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SBFLLRLJ

@misc{pith2026250906622,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: MARTA: The connection between chemical enrichment, feedback, and dust in a Wolf-Rayet galaxy at z$\sim$2},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SBFLLRLJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.06622}
}
abstract

We present the analysis of the stellar and interstellar medium (ISM) properties of MARTA-4327, a star-forming galaxy at z=2.224 observed by means of deep JWST/NIRSpec spectroscopy in both medium- and high-resolution gratings as part of the "Measuring Abundances at high Redshift with the Te Approach" (MARTA) programme. We report one of the highest-redshift detections of the Wolf-Rayet (WR) blue and red bumps in a non-lensed system. The broad He ii${\lambda}$4686 feature is consistent with a young (${\sim 5-6}$ Myr) burst dominated by WN stars, although both SSP models and empirical templates struggle to reproduce the nitrogen stellar features at ${\approx}$ 4640 A. Based on the relative strength of the available optical stellar features, we disfavor the presence of very massive stars (VMS) in this system. Elemental abundance ratios such as Ne/O, N/O, and Ar/O align with observations of local star-forming galaxies (including WR galaxies), suggesting that any impact of the WR population on the chemical enrichment of the ISM is strongly localized. However, the gas-phase Fe/O ratio appears enhanced compared to local galaxies of similar metallicity, which we interpret as evidence for reduced Fe depletion onto dust grains, possibly linked to localized destruction in WR-driven wind environments. In addition, we detect a broad and blueshifted (~70 km/s) H${\alpha}$ component, revealing the presence of an ionized outflow with a mass loading factor ${\eta \sim 0.2}$. Finally, we report the robust detection of O I${\lambda}$8446 emission (among the firsts at high redshift), which we interpret as originating from Ly${\beta}$ fluorescence and/or collisional excitation in dense clumps. Overall, MARTA-4327 represents a unique system for studying the role of massive stars in shaping the ISM in galaxies at Cosmic Noon.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.06622 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. False colour RGB image of M4327. The 3-shutters-long [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. JWST/NIRSpec spectrum of MARTA-4327. Top panel : Combined G140M/F100LP (green) and G235M/F170LP (red) spec￾trum. The main emission lines detected are reported. Middle panels: Zoom-in onto the region of the auroral lines, i.e. [O iii]λ4363 and [S ii]λ4069 in G140M (left), [S iii]λ6312 and [O ii]λλ7320,7330 in G235M (right). The ppxf best-fit to the spectrum is overlaid in red (continuum in green, emission lines highl… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Blue and red bump features in M4327. The plots show a zoom-in on the spectral region between 4550 - 4750 Å (left panel), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: R versus wavelength for M4327. The logarithm of the ratio between observed and theoretical (case B) line ratios of hydrogen lines to Hα, R, is plotted as a function of wavelength. Coloured lines represent the R vs λ relationship predicted for dif￾ferent values of E(B −…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Relative gas-phase Fe, O, and N abundance patterns. The position of M4327 in the log(Fe/ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of blue and red bump features in M4327 with SSP models and empirical templates. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison between the EWs of the blue and red bump features. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Chemical abundance patterns. From left to right, we show the position of M4327 in the Ne/ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: [O/Fe] versus sSFR relationship for galaxies. The location of M4327 is reported alongside a literature sample comprised of nearby dwarf galaxies, local galaxies with blue supergiant-based metallicity estimates, extremely metal-poor dwarf galaxies, and high-redshift st…

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BlackTHUNDER: Evidence of three massive black holes in a z~5 galaxy

    astro-ph.GA 2025-09 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Observations of the z=5.0167 galaxy J0148-4214 reveal three spatially distinct broad H-alpha regions, interpreted as three massive accreting black holes, including a close 190 pc pair.

  2. The AURORA Survey: Constraining Chemical Enrichment Pathways at Cosmic Noon with Argon Abundances

    astro-ph.GA 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Median-stacked spectra of 46 z=2–3.5 galaxies give Ar/O ≈ 0.42 solar in both redshift bins, a subsolar ratio consistent with CCSNe-dominant enrichment and rapid, bulge-like star formation.

  3. Little Red and Blue Dots: AGN-excited narrow lines, Lyman-$\alpha$ emission, and resemblance to standard quasars

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    JWST data on LRDs and LBDs show AGN-like excitation, strong Lyα with broad components, and X-ray weakness, implying clumpy or equatorial geometries around growing black holes rather than complete gas envelopes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

167 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    J., & Morrell, N

    Aadland, E., Massey, P., Hillier, D. J., & Morrell, N. 2022, ApJ, 924, 44

    2022

  2. [2]

    D., Vanzella , E., et al

    Adamo , A., Bradley , L. D., Vanzella , E., et al. 2024, , 632, 513

    2024

  3. [3]

    G., Groves, B

    Allen, M. G., Groves, B. A., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., & Kewley, L. J. 2008, , 178, 20

    2008

  4. [4]

    M., Nissen , P

    Amarsi , A. M., Nissen , P. E., & Sk \'u lad \'o ttir , \'A . 2019, , 630, A104

    2019

  5. [5]

    2021, , 505, 2361

    Amayo , A., Delgado-Inglada , G., & Stasi \'n ska , G. 2021, , 505, 2361

    2021

  6. [6]

    Anderson, J. P. 2019, A&A, 628, A7

    2019

  7. [7]

    Z., Cullen , F., Carnall , A

    Arellano-C \'o rdova , K. Z., Cullen , F., Carnall , A. C., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.10557

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    2022, , 666, A109

    Arnaboldi , M., Bhattacharya , S., Gerhard , O., et al. 2022, , 666, A109

    2022

Show all 167 references
  1. [9]

    M., & Grevesse , N

    Asplund , M., Amarsi , A. M., & Grevesse , N. 2021, , 653, A141

    2021

  2. [10]

    A., Olive , K

    Aver , E., Berg , D. A., Olive , K. A., et al. 2021, , 2021, 027

    2021

  3. [11]

    A., & Skillman , E

    Aver , E., Olive , K. A., & Skillman , E. D. 2010, , 2010, 003

    2010

  4. [12]

    A., & Skillman , E

    Aver , E., Olive , K. A., & Skillman , E. D. 2011, , 2011, 043

    2011

  5. [13]

    A., Pogge, R

    Berg, D. A., Pogge, R. W., Skillman, E. D., et al. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 893, 96

    2020

  6. [14]

    A., Skillman , E

    Berg , D. A., Skillman , E. D., Chisholm , J., et al. 2024, , 971, 87

    2024

  7. [15]

    A., Skillman, E

    Berg, D. A., Skillman, E. D., Henry, R. B. C., Erb, D. K., & Carigi, L. 2016, , 827, 126

    2016

  8. [16]

    2025, , 983, L30

    Bhattacharya , S., Arnaboldi , M., Gerhard , O., Kobayashi , C., & Saha , K. 2025, , 983, L30

    2025

  9. [17]

    J., & Dopita, M

    Bian, F., Kewley, L. J., & Dopita, M. A. 2018, , 859, 175

    2018

  10. [18]

    2008 a , , 485, 657

    Brinchmann , J., Kunth , D., & Durret , F. 2008 a , , 485, 657

    2008

  11. [19]

    2008 b , , 385, 769

    Brinchmann , J., Pettini , M., & Charlot , S. 2008 b , , 385, 769

    2008

  12. [20]

    Byrne , C. M. & Stanway , E. R. 2023, , 521, 4995

    2023

  13. [21]

    2021, , 646, A39

    Calabr \`o , A., Castellano , M., Pentericci , L., et al. 2021, , 646, A39

    2021

  14. [22]

    J., Katz , H., Rey , M

    Cameron , A. J., Katz , H., Rey , M. P., & Saxena , A. 2023, , 523, 3516

    2023

  15. [23]

    2017, , 466, 798

    Cappellari, M. 2017, , 466, 798

    2017

  16. [24]

    2023, , 526, 3273

    Cappellari , M. 2023, , 526, 3273

    2023

  17. [25]

    & Emsellem, E

    Cappellari, M. & Emsellem, E. 2004, , 116, 138

    2004

  18. [26]

    A., Clayton, G

    Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, , 345, 245

    1989

  19. [27]

    C., Cullen , F., McLure , R

    Carnall , A. C., Cullen , F., McLure , R. J., et al. 2024, , 534, 325

    2024

  20. [28]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.03839

    Cataldi , E., Belfiore , F., Curti , M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.03839

    2025

  21. [29]

    2003, , 115, 763

    Chabrier, G. 2003, , 115, 763

    2003

  22. [30]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.15435

    Chakraborty , P., Sarkar , A., Smith , R., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.15435

    2024

  23. [31]

    2023, , 673, L7

    Charbonnel , C., Schaerer , D., Prantzos , N., et al. 2023, , 673, L7

    2023

  24. [32]

    2025, , 698, A16

    Choe , S., Emil Rivera-Thorsen , T., Dahle , H., et al. 2025, , 698, A16

    2025

  25. [33]

    2012, , 427, 1973

    Christensen, L., Laursen, P., Richard, J., et al. 2012, , 427, 1973

    2012

  26. [34]

    2024, , 686, A186

    Chru \'s li \'n ska , M., Pakmor , R., Matthee , J., & Matsuno , T. 2024, , 686, A186

    2024

  27. [35]

    2014, , 562, A21

    Cicone, C., Maiolino, R., Sturm, E., et al. 2014, , 562, A21

    2014

  28. [36]

    Crowther , P. A. 2000, , 356, 191

    2000

  29. [37]

    Crowther , P. A. 2007, , 45, 177

    2007

  30. [38]

    A., Rate , G., & Bestenlehner , J

    Crowther , P. A., Rate , G., & Bestenlehner , J. M. 2023, , 521, 585

    2023

  31. [39]

    E., McLure , R

    Cullen , F., Shapley , A. E., McLure , R. J., et al. 2021, , 505, 903

    2021

  32. [40]

    2017, , 465, 1384

    Curti, M., Cresci, G., Mannucci, F., et al. 2017, , 465, 1384

    2017

  33. [41]

    2023, , 518, 425

    Curti , M., D'Eugenio , F., Carniani , S., et al. 2023, , 518, 425

    2023

  34. [42]

    2025, , 697, A89

    Curti , M., Witstok , J., Jakobsen , P., et al. 2025, , 697, A89

    2025

  35. [43]

    & Humphreys , R

    Davidson , K. & Humphreys , R. M. 2012, , 486, E1

    2012

  36. [44]

    J., et al

    De Cia , A., Ledoux , C., Fox , A. J., et al. 2012, , 545, A64

    2012

  37. [45]

    2016, , 596, A97

    De Cia , A., Ledoux , C., Mattsson , L., et al. 2016, , 596, A97

    2016

  38. [46]

    S., Abraham , R

    Dunlop , J. S., Abraham , R. G., Ashby , M. L. N., et al. 2021, PRIMER: Public Release IMaging for Extragalactic Research , JWST Proposal. Cycle 1, ID. \#1837

    2021

  39. [47]

    Eldridge, J. J. & Stanway, E. R. 2009, MNRAS, 400, 1019

    2009

  40. [48]

    J., Stanway , E

    Eldridge , J. J., Stanway , E. R., Xiao , L., et al. 2017, , 34, e058

    2017

  41. [49]

    Eldridge, J. J. & Vink, J. S. 2006, A&A, 452, 295–301

    2006

  42. [50]

    K., Steidel, C

    Erb, D. K., Steidel, C. C., Shapley, A. E., et al. 2006, , 647, 128

    2006

  43. [51]

    2017, , 601, A143

    Fiore, F., Feruglio, C., Shankar, F., et al. 2017, , 601, A143

    2017

  44. [52]

    W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J

    Foreman-Mackey , D., Hogg , D. W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J. 2013, , 125, 306

    2013

  45. [53]

    M., Übler, H., Davies, R

    Förster Schreiber, N. M., Übler, H., Davies, R. L., et al. 2018, arXiv e-prints

    2018

  46. [54]

    2011, , 733, 101

    Genzel, R., Newman, S., Jones, T., et al. 2011, , 733, 101

    2011

  47. [55]

    D., Clayton , G

    Gordon , K. D., Clayton , G. C., Misselt , K. A., Landolt , A. U., & Wolff , M. J. 2003, , 594, 279

    2003

  48. [56]

    E., & Groh , J

    G \"o tberg , Y., de Mink , S. E., & Groh , J. H. 2017, , 608, A11

    2017

  49. [57]

    Grandi, S. A. 1980, ApJ, 238, 10

    1980

  50. [58]

    Greene , J. E. & Ho , L. C. 2007, , 667, 131

    2007

  51. [59]

    Gunawardhana , M. L. P., Brinchmann , J., Croom , S., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.12584

    2025 arXiv

  52. [60]

    2014, A&A, 565, A27

    Hainich, R., R \"u hling, U., Todt, H., et al. 2014, A&A, 565, A27

    2014

  53. [61]

    Hillier, D. J. & Miller, D. L. 1999, ApJ, 519, 354

    1999

  54. [62]

    J., Prochaska , J

    Hsyu , T., Cooke , R. J., Prochaska , J. X., & Bolte , M. 2020, , 896, 77

    2020

  55. [63]

    & Tutukov , A

    Iben , Jr., I. & Tutukov , A. V. 1984, , 54, 335

    1984

  56. [64]

    2023, , 518, 1818

    Imasheva , L., Janka , H.-T., & Weiss , A. 2023, , 518, 1818

    2023

  57. [65]

    2023, , 959, 100

    Isobe , Y., Ouchi , M., Tominaga , N., et al. 2023, , 959, 100

    2023

  58. [66]

    I., Stasińska, G., Meynet, G., Guseva, N

    Izotov, Y. I., Stasińska, G., Meynet, G., Guseva, N. G., & Thuan, T. X. 2006, , 448, 955

    2006

  59. [67]

    I., Thuan, T

    Izotov, Y. I., Thuan, T. X., & Guseva, N. G. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 548

    2017

  60. [68]

    I., Thuan , T

    Izotov , Y. I., Thuan , T. X., & Guseva , N. G. 2021, , 504, 3996

    2021

  61. [69]

    I., Thuan , T

    Izotov , Y. I., Thuan , T. X., Guseva , N. G., & Liss , S. E. 2018, , 473, 1956

    2018

  62. [70]

    Jenkins , E. B. 2009, , 700, 1299

    2009

  63. [71]

    2024, , 535, 881

    Ji , X., \"U bler , H., Maiolino , R., et al. 2024, , 535, 881

    2024

  64. [72]

    & Letokhov , V

    Johansson , S. & Letokhov , V. S. 2004, , 428, 497

    2004

  65. [73]

    & Letokhov, V

    Johansson, S. & Letokhov, V. S. 2005, MNRAS, 364, 731

    2005

  66. [74]

    J., Renzini , A., et al

    Kashino , D., Lilly , S. J., Renzini , A., et al. 2022, , 925, 82

    2022

  67. [75]

    D., Sanders, D., et al

    Kashino, D., Silverman, J. D., Sanders, D., et al. 2019, , 241, 10

    2019

  68. [76]

    Kennicutt, R. C. & Evans, N. J. 2012, , 50, 531

    2012

  69. [77]

    I., & Lugaro , M

    Kobayashi , C., Karakas , A. I., & Lugaro , M. 2020, , 900, 179

    2020

  70. [78]

    Kobulnicky, H. A. & Skillman, E. D. 1997, ApJ, 489, 636

    1997

  71. [79]

    A., Skillman , E

    Kobulnicky , H. A., Skillman , E. D., Roy , J.-R., Walsh , J. R., & Rosa , M. R. 1997, , 477, 679

    1997

  72. [80]

    2021, ApJ, 913, 22

    Kojima, T., Ouchi, M., Rauch, M., et al. 2021, ApJ, 913, 22

    2021

  73. [81]

    H., Maseda , M

    Laseter , I. H., Maseda , M. V., Curti , M., et al. 2024, , 681, A70

    2024

  74. [82]

    L \'o pez-S \'a nchez , \'A . R. & Esteban , C. 2010, , 517, A85

    2010

  75. [83]

    R., Esteban , C., Garc \' a-Rojas , J., Peimbert , M., & Rodr \' guez , M

    L \'o pez-S \'a nchez , \'A . R., Esteban , C., Garc \' a-Rojas , J., Peimbert , M., & Rodr \' guez , M. 2007, , 656, 168

    2007

  76. [84]

    2008, , 488, 463

    Maiolino, R., Nagao, T., Grazian, A., et al. 2008, , 488, 463

    2008

  77. [85]

    2009, , 398, 1915

    Mannucci, F., Cresci, G., Maiolino, R., et al. 2009, , 398, 1915

    2009

  78. [86]

    & Graur , O

    Maoz , D. & Graur , O. 2017, , 848, 25

    2017

  79. [87]

    2023, , 670, A92

    Marasco , A., Belfiore , F., Cresci , G., et al. 2023, , 670, A92

    2023

  80. [88]

    & Palacios , A

    Martins , F. & Palacios , A. 2022, , 659, A163

    2022

  81. [89]

    & Palacios, A

    Martins, F. & Palacios, A. 2022, A&A, 659, A163

    2022

  82. [90]

    2023, , 678, A159

    Martins , F., Schaerer , D., Marques-Chaves , R., & Upadhyaya , A. 2023, , 678, A159

    2023

  83. [91]

    2007, , 663, 781

    Matsuoka , Y., Oyabu , S., Tsuzuki , Y., & Kawara , K. 2007, , 663, 781

    2007

  84. [92]

    E., Esteban , C., Garc \' a-Rojas , J., Kreckel , K., & Peimbert , M

    M \'e ndez-Delgado , J. E., Esteban , C., Garc \' a-Rojas , J., Kreckel , K., & Peimbert , M. 2023, , 618, 249

    2023

  85. [93]

    E., Kreckel , K., Esteban , C., et al

    M \'e ndez-Delgado , J. E., Kreckel , K., Esteban , C., et al. 2024, , 690, A248

    2024

  86. [94]

    2009, , 395, 855

    Mesa-Delgado , A., Esteban , C., Garc \' a-Rojas , J., et al. 2009, , 395, 855

    2009

  87. [95]

    2023, , 673, A50

    Me s tri \'c , U., Vanzella , E., Upadhyaya , A., et al. 2023, , 673, A50

    2023

  88. [96]

    L., & Bressan , A

    Moll \'a , M., Garc \' a-Vargas , M. L., & Bressan , A. 2009, , 398, 451

    2009

  89. [97]

    E., Skillman , E

    M 'endez-Delgado , J. E., Skillman , E. D., Aver , E., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.17381

    2024 arXiv

  90. [98]

    L., Kere s , D., Faucher-Gigu \`e re , C.-A., et al

    Muratov , A. L., Kere s , D., Faucher-Gigu \`e re , C.-A., et al. 2015, , 454, 2691

    2015

  91. [99]

    P., Pillepich , A., Springel , V., et al

    Naiman , J. P., Pillepich , A., Springel , V., et al. 2018, , 477, 1206

    2018

  92. [100]

    2023, , 269, 33

    Nakajima , K., Ouchi , M., Isobe , Y., et al. 2023, , 269, 33

    2023

  93. [101]

    2013, in IAU Symposium, Vol

    Nelemans , G., Toonen , S., & Bours , M. 2013, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 281, Binary Paths to Type Ia Supernovae Explosions, ed. R. Di Stefano , M. Orio , & M. Moe , 225--231

    2013

  94. [102]

    2019, MNRAS, 490, 3234

    Nelson, D., Pillepich, A., Springel, V., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 3234

    2019

  95. [103]

    2019, Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology, 6, 2

    Nelson , D., Springel , V., Pillepich , A., et al. 2019, Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology, 6, 2

    2019

  96. [104]

    & Penston, M

    Netzer, H. & Penston, M. V. 1976, MNRAS, 174, 319

    1976

  97. [105]

    2013, , 51, 457

    Nomoto , K., Kobayashi , C., & Tominaga , N. 2013, , 51, 457

    2013

  98. [106]

    2006, , 777, 424

    Nomoto , K., Tominaga , N., Umeda , H., Kobayashi , C., & Maeda , K. 2006, , 777, 424

    2006

  99. [107]

    1993, , 276, 415

    Oliva , E. 1993, , 276, 415

    1993

  100. [108]

    Olive , K. A. & Skillman , E. D. 2004, , 617, 29

    2004

  101. [109]

    N., Pradhan, A

    Palay, E., Nahar, S. N., Pradhan, A. K., & Eissner, W. 2012, , 423, L35

    2012

  102. [110]

    F., & Tsang , B

    Pascale , M., Dai , L., McKee , C. F., & Tsang , B. T. H. 2023, , 957, 77

    2023

  103. [111]

    Patrício, V., Christensen, L., Rhodin, H., Cañameras, R., & Lara-López, M. A. 2018, , 481, 3520

    2018

  104. [112]

    & Pagel, B

    Pettini, M. & Pagel, B. E. J. 2004, , 348, L59

    2004

  105. [113]

    E., Steidel , C

    Pettini , M., Shapley , A. E., Steidel , C. C., et al. 2001, , 554, 981

    2001

  106. [114]

    2018, , 473, 4077

    Pillepich , A., Springel , V., Nelson , D., et al. 2018, , 473, 4077

    2018

  107. [115]

    2020, , 641, A6

    Planck Collaboration , Aghanim , N., Akrami , Y., et al. 2020, , 641, A6

    2020

  108. [116]

    L., Ferland , G

    Porter , R. L., Ferland , G. J., Storey , P. J., & Detisch , M. J. 2013, , 433, L89

    2013

  109. [117]

    A., Shapley , A

    Reddy , N. A., Shapley , A. E., Sanders , R. L., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.17396

    2025 arXiv

  110. [118]

    E., Greene , J

    Reines , A. E., Greene , J. E., & Geha , M. 2013, , 775, 116

    2013

  111. [119]

    E., Chisholm , J., Welch , B., et al

    Rivera-Thorsen , T. E., Chisholm , J., Welch , B., et al. 2024, , 690, A269

    2024

  112. [120]

    G., Puls , J., & Najarro , F

    Rivero Gonz \'a lez , J. G., Puls , J., & Najarro , F. 2011, , 536, A58

    2011

  113. [121]

    & Rubin , R

    Rodr \' guez , M. & Rubin , R. H. 2005, , 626, 900

    2005

  114. [122]

    2023, , 955, 71

    Rodr \' guez , \'O ., Maoz , D., & Nakar , E. 2023, , 955, 71

    2023

  115. [123]

    G., Viegas , S., Sigut , T

    Rodr \' guez-Ardila , A., Pastoriza , M. G., Viegas , S., Sigut , T. A. A., & Pradhan , A. K. 2004, , 425, 457

    2004

  116. [124]

    Rogers , N. S. J., Strom , A. L., Rudie , G. C., et al. 2024, , 964, L12

    2024

  117. [125]

    B., Tchernyshyov , K., et al

    Roman-Duval , J., Jenkins , E. B., Tchernyshyov , K., et al. 2022, , 928, 90

    2022

  118. [126]

    J., Erwin , P., Rossano , G

    Rudy , R. J., Erwin , P., Rossano , G. S., & Puetter , R. C. 1992, , 384, 536

    1992

  119. [127]

    J., Rossano , G

    Rudy , R. J., Rossano , G. S., & Puetter , R. C. 1989, , 342, 235

    1989

  120. [128]

    S., Veilleux , S., & Sanders , D

    Rupke , D. S., Veilleux , S., & Sanders , D. B. 2005, , 632, 751

    2005

  121. [129]

    N., Vink , J

    Sabhahit , G. N., Vink , J. S., Sander , A. A. C., & Higgins , E. R. 2023, , 524, 1529

    2023

  122. [130]

    R., & Todt , H

    Sander , A., Hamann , W. R., & Todt , H. 2012, , 540, A144

    2012

  123. [131]

    L., Shapley, A

    Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., Kriek, M., et al. 2015, , 799, 138

    2015

  124. [132]

    L., Shapley, A

    Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., Kriek, M., et al. 2016, , 825, L23

    2016

  125. [133]

    L., Shapley , A

    Sanders , R. L., Shapley , A. E., Topping , M. W., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.10099

    2025 arXiv

  126. [134]

    L., Shapley , A

    Sanders , R. L., Shapley , A. E., Topping , M. W., Reddy , N. A., & Brammer , G. B. 2024, , 962, 24

    2024

  127. [135]

    & Suwa, Y

    Sawada, R. & Suwa, Y. 2023, ApJ (submitted) [ arXiv:2301.03610 ]

    2023 arXiv

  128. [136]

    A., Bower , R

    Schaye , J., Crain , R. A., Bower , R. G., et al. 2015, , 446, 521

    2015

  129. [137]

    C., et al

    Scholte , D., Cullen , F., Carnall , A. C., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.10499

    2025 arXiv

  130. [138]

    1978, Annals of Statistics, 6, 461

    Schwarz , G. 1978, Annals of Statistics, 6, 461

    1978

  131. [139]

    Shapley, A. E. 2011, , 49, 525

    2011

  132. [140]

    E., Reddy, N

    Shapley, A. E., Reddy, N. A., Kriek, M., et al. 2015, , 801, 88

    2015

  133. [141]

    E., Sanders , R

    Shapley , A. E., Sanders , R. L., Topping , M. W., et al. 2025, , 980, 242

    2025

  134. [142]

    2012, , 539, A136

    Sommariva, V., Mannucci, F., Cresci, G., et al. 2012, , 539, A136

    2012

  135. [143]

    M., Cullen , F., Carnall , A

    Stanton , T. M., Cullen , F., Carnall , A. C., et al. 2025, , 537, 1735

    2025

  136. [144]

    Stanway , E. R. & Eldridge , J. J. 2018, , 479, 75

    2018

  137. [145]

    C., Adelberger, K

    Steidel, C. C., Adelberger, K. L., Shapley, A. E., et al. 2003, , 592, 728

    2003

  138. [146]

    C., Rudie, G

    Steidel, C. C., Rudie, G. C., Strom, A. L., et al. 2014, , 795, 165

    2014

  139. [147]

    C., Strom, A

    Steidel, C. C., Strom, A. L., Pettini, M., et al. 2016, , 826, 159

    2016

  140. [148]

    & Laor , A

    Stern , J. & Laor , A. 2012, , 423, 600

    2012

  141. [149]

    Strickland, D. K. & Heckman, T. M. 2009, ApJ, 697, 2030

    2009

  142. [150]

    L., Rudie , G

    Strom , A. L., Rudie , G. C., Trainor , R. F., et al. 2023, , 958, L11

    2023

  143. [151]

    L., Steidel , C

    Strom , A. L., Steidel , C. C., Rudie , G. C., Trainor , R. F., & Pettini , M. 2018, , 868, 117

    2018

  144. [152]

    2007, , 660, 516

    Tominaga , N., Umeda , H., & Nomoto , K. 2007, , 660, 516

    2007

  145. [153]

    W., Shapley, A

    Topping, M. W., Shapley, A. E., Reddy, N. A., et al. 2020, arXiv:2008.02282 [astro-ph], arXiv: 2008.02282

    2020 arXiv

  146. [154]

    W., Shapley , A

    Topping , M. W., Shapley , A. E., Reddy , N. A., et al. 2020, , 495, 4430

    2020

  147. [155]

    W., Stark , D

    Topping , M. W., Stark , D. P., Senchyna , P., et al. 2024, , 529, 3301

    2024

  148. [156]

    M., Sanyal , D., et al

    Tramper , F., Straal , S. M., Sanyal , D., et al. 2015, , 581, A110

    2015

  149. [157]

    S., & Werk, J

    Tumlinson, J., Peeples, M. S., & Werk, J. K. 2017, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 55, 389

    2017

  150. [158]

    2016, , 460, 1739

    Vale Asari, N., Stasińska, G., Morisset, C., & Cid Fernandes, R. 2016, , 460, 1739

    2016

  151. [159]

    Vink , J. S. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.18980

    2024 arXiv

  152. [160]

    Vink , J. S. & Gr \"a fener , G. 2012, , 751, L34

    2012

  153. [161]

    S., Muijres , L

    Vink , J. S., Muijres , L. E., Anthonisse , B., et al. 2011, , 531, A132

    2011

  154. [162]

    & Draine , B

    Waxman , E. & Draine , B. T. 2000, , 537, 796

    2000

  155. [163]

    Webbink , R. F. 1984, , 277, 355

    1984

  156. [164]

    E., Rigby , J

    Welch , B., Rivera-Thorsen , T. E., Rigby , J. R., et al. 2025, , 980, 33

    2025

  157. [165]

    Woosley, S. E. & Heger, A. 2007, Phys. Rep., 442, 269

    2007

  158. [166]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sent...

  159. [167]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.