Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
As of 22 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 8 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2407.13948.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-16T11:37:23.882213Z
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z
0 of 0 outbound references displayed
External citation measurements
0
arxiv_reference, observed 2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z
No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.
Observation 2db38281-c978-47fe-acb5-cde6d3070dbd · inbound
Safety case template for frontier AI: A cyber inability argument Assurance of AI Systems From a Dependability Perspective
Reference 9
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation e5b5e353-5dfd-45bf-a606-8ccff4489b86 · inbound
Where AI Assurance Might Go Wrong: Initial lessons from engineering of critical systems Assurance of AI Systems From a Dependability Perspective
Reference 9
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation a15c8d27-e579-4b0f-a0f2-173e5ea33ed3 · inbound
Safety Co-Option and Compromised National Security: The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy of Weakened AI Risk Thresholds Assurance of AI Systems From a Dependability Perspective
Reference 10
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 0cb5294e-b796-4177-951b-3fdc09958c5c · inbound
Understanding: reframing automation and assurance Assurance of AI Systems From a Dependability Perspective
Reference 11
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.
Observation a5a19e61-de11-470e-8323-9c4bf3c15fc5 · inbound
Not All Anquan Is the Same: A Terminological Proposal for Chinese Computer Science and Engineering Assurance of AI Systems From a Dependability Perspective
Reference 53
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.
Observation e1ac7e26-6704-4c58-bfb8-f5d44876df27 · inbound
Not All Anquan Is the Same: A Terminological Proposal for Chinese Computer Science and Engineering Assurance of AI Systems From a Dependability Perspective
Reference 53
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.
Observation caabf259-a088-459a-bb27-e1e886c71b6b · inbound
CEDAR-42001: From ISO/IEC 42001 Conformity to Architecture-Aware, Audit-Visible Assurance Posture for AI Cyber-Physical Systems Assurance of AI Systems From a Dependability Perspective
Reference 1
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.
Observation 4c7ef342-f662-441c-a046-a24ed6d27b45 · inbound
From Agent Failure Paths to Quantified Residual Risk: A Compositional Framework for Resilient Agentic AI Assurance of AI Systems From a Dependability Perspective
Reference 20
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.