Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 55 references

FramePrompt: In-context Controllable Animation with Zero Structural Changes

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Pretrained video diffusion transformers can animate characters without architectural changes, FramePrompt argues.

desk verdict A clean and plausible recipe for skeleton-driven animation without new modules, but the quantitative case rests on a small test set and one overreaching attention claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.17301 v2 pith:SEUK7SC5 submitted 2025-06-17 cs.GR

Guian Fang , Yuchao Gu , Mike Zheng Shou This is my paper
classification cs.GR
keywords controllablecharacteranimationvideodiffusiontransformervisualin-contextlearningunifiedsequencepromptingmaskeddenoisingskeleton-guidedfuturepredictionzeroarchitecturalmodification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that controllable character animation does not require specialized conditioning architectures. It claims that a pretrained video diffusion transformer, when given a reference image, skeleton motion, and target frames as one concatenated visual sequence, already has enough in-context capability to generate the target animation. The method, FramePrompt, only changes how inputs are organized and where the denoising loss is applied, leaving the model weights and architecture untouched. If true, this simplifies training and deployment, and the authors report large gains over representative baselines on standard metrics.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is Unified Sequential Prompting: the input is arranged as $X = [I_{\text{ref}}, S_1, \ldots, S_T, Z_1, \ldots, Z_T]$, a single sequence of reference, skeleton, and placeholder target frames, with a binary mask $M$ that freezes context tokens and noises only prediction tokens. The pretrained transformer's causal attention naturally restricts target tokens to attending to preceding context, so the model learns to extend the reference and skeleton into coherent animation. Only the denoised target segment is decoded, and applying the loss only on those frames (half-frame loss) is the key training choice.

What would settle it

Run FramePrompt and the leading baseline on a large held-out set of real videos (several hundred clips) with multiple training seeds, and compute confidence intervals for SSIM, PSNR, LPIPS, and FVD; a failure to beat the baseline beyond the interval would refute the paper's central performance claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

FramePrompt discovers that pretrained video diffusion transformers inherently possess contextual understanding for heterogeneous visual input, needing no architectural modifications or extra conditioning mechanisms. The model treats the reference image, skeleton sequence, and target frames as a unified visual sequence and applies selective noise diffusion only to target tokens, effectively reformulating animation as conditional future prediction. Under the best configuration, the paper reports improvements of roughly 5.93% in SSIM, 20.65% in PSNR, 34.95% in LPIPS, and 53.87% in FVD over the UniAnimate-DiT 1.3B baseline.

Load-bearing premise

The reported superiority rests on a test set of only 30 synthetic videos; if those clips do not give low-variance estimates of FVD and other metrics, the claimed margins over baselines may evaporate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Character animation becomes a data-organization problem: the same pretrained weights can be reused without adding trainable modules.
  • Training can be far more data-efficient: the paper uses 394 synthetic videos, while baselines use over 10,000, yet FramePrompt still leads on metrics.
  • Applying denoising loss only on target frames improves results over all-frame loss across all reported metrics.
  • On the synthetic benchmark the smaller 1.3B model matches or beats the 14B model, suggesting capacity should be matched to data scale.
  • Validation on the real-world TikTok dataset shows the advantage transfers beyond synthetic data.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the central claim holds, other conditional video tasks such as video inpainting, camera control, or multi-character interaction may be solvable by the same prompting trick, since the underlying capability is general context modeling rather than task-specific modules.
  • The 30-video test set leaves room for a larger benchmark; a natural next step is measuring FramePrompt against baselines on hundreds of real clips to verify the reported margins.
  • The method's ceiling is the pretrained model's context length, so extending effective sequence length or handling boundary frames would likely become the main research bottleneck.
  • A controlled comparison with the same data and fine-tuning budget would clarify how much of the gain comes from sequence organization versus fine-tuning itself.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. FramePrompt proposes a minimalist framework for controllable character animation from a reference image and skeleton guidance. Instead of adding specialized encoder modules or architectural modifications, the method concatenates the reference image, skeleton frames, and target video frames into a single spatio-temporal sequence, feeds this sequence into a pretrained video diffusion transformer (Wan-I2V), and applies masked denoising so that only the target frames are generated. The paper claims that this reformulation of animation as future-sequence prediction lets pretrained video diffusion transformers perform the task without structural changes, and that it outperforms representative baselines (U-Net and DiT-based) on SSIM, PSNR, LPIPS, and FVD. The main evidence is in Table 1 and Figure 3, with additional TikTok results in the appendix and ablations over loss design, model size, and fine-tuning strategy.

Significance. If the quantitative claims hold, FramePrompt is a useful and striking simplification: it suggests that a single pretrained video DiT can handle heterogeneous visual conditioning inputs by sequence organization alone, avoiding the architectural overhead of prior human-animation methods. The paper is clearly written, the ablations are internally consistent, and the idea of reformulating animation as masked future prediction is elegant and likely to be of interest to the video-generation community. However, the significance is currently constrained by the small evaluation set, the lack of statistical rigor, and the fairness of the baseline comparisons; the headline outperformance claims need stronger evidence before the central conclusion can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4.1.1, Table 1] The quantitative superiority claim rests on a test set of only 30 synthetic videos, with no confidence intervals, standard deviations, or multiple-seed runs reported. This is especially problematic for FVD, a distributional metric estimated from video embeddings; with 30 clips, the FVD estimates and covariance terms are high-variance, so the reported margin (e.g., FVD 150.21 vs. 325.62, a 53.87% improvement) may not be statistically meaningful. The authors should provide bootstrap confidence intervals, run multiple seeds, or use a substantially larger held-out test set; without this, the central claim that FramePrompt 'significantly outperforms' baselines is not established.
  2. [Sec. 4.1.3, Table 1] The comparison to U-Net baselines is not fair: MimicMotion, DisPose, AnimateAnyone, and MagicAnimate are evaluated zero-shot without fine-tuning, while FramePrompt and the DiT baselines are fine-tuned (full or LoRA) on the target domain. Additionally, the synthetic test set is drawn from the same Blender pipeline used for training, which can inflate performance for methods trained on that distribution. The authors should either fine-tune the U-Net baselines on the same data or clearly label the comparison as zero-shot and provide a matched fine-tuning comparison for at least one strong U-Net baseline.
  3. [Sec. 3.1, Sec. 3.5] The novelty framing needs sharper positioning. Wan-I2V already supports masked temporal completion (video continuation, first-last interpolation), and FramePrompt essentially applies this masking mechanism to skeleton-guided animation with a specific sequence arrangement. The claim to demonstrate 'for the first time' that pretrained video diffusion transformers possess contextual understanding for heterogeneous visual input is too strong without a direct comparison to a Wan-I2V baseline that uses its default masking and conditioning; the paper should include such a baseline or soften the claim.
  4. [Sec. A.1.1] All experiments use a single random seed (42). Given the small test set and the stochastic nature of diffusion generation, the reported metric differences between configurations (e.g., half-frame vs. all-frame loss) may not be stable. Reporting mean and variance over at least three seeds, or providing per-video metric distributions, would substantially strengthen the empirical claims.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract (first sentence)] The sentence 'The project website are available at: Website' contains a grammatical error and an incomplete reference; it should be revised.
  2. [Figure 2] The label '3D VA E' has a spacing error ('VA E' should be 'VAE').
  3. [Sec. 4.1.1] The dataset description states 394 videos and 30 reserved for testing, but it is not specified how many are used for training versus validation; please clarify the exact train/validation/test split and whether validation was used for early stopping.
  4. [Sec. 3.3, Eq. (1)] In Eq. (1), the dimensions of Iref, St, and Zt are not explicitly defined before use; please add a sentence clarifying that each is in RC×1×H×W and that the concatenation is along the temporal dimension.
  5. [Sec. 4.3.1] The reported relative improvements for half-frame loss over all-frame loss (0.78% SSIM, 2.39% PSNR, 8.98% LPIPS, 22.06% FVD) are consistent with Table 1, but the FVD improvement is large and should be discussed in light of the small test set.
  6. [Sec. 4.2] Figure 3 shows training curves over 10 epochs, but does not include error bars or multiple runs; without this, the 'faster convergence' and 'better final performance' claims are not statistically supported.
  7. [Sec. B.1, Table 3] The TikTok dataset results are reported without specifying the number of test videos or the test split; please provide this information so the reader can judge the reliability of these numbers.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central claim is an empirical, out-of-sample measurement, and the only self-citation (MagicAnimate as a baseline) is not load-bearing.

full rationale

FramePrompt is an empirical methods paper, not a derivation, and its central claim does not reduce to its own inputs. The method (Eqs. 1-8) is a standard masked noise-prediction pipeline: the reference image and skeleton frames serve as context tokens, the target segment is masked and noised, and the model is trained to predict the noise on the target segment (Eqs. 4-5); at inference (Eqs. 6-7) the denoised target segment is decoded and compared against held-out ground truth. No parameter is fitted to the reported metrics and then renamed as a prediction; the SSIM/PSNR/LPIPS/FVD numbers in Tables 1 and 3 are measured on reserved test videos (30 synthetic clips per Sec. 4.1.1, plus the TikTok dataset) with the trained model frozen, so the claimed gains over UniAnimate-DiT and VideoX-Fun are out-of-sample measurements rather than consequences of the paper's own assumptions. The framing as 'future sequence prediction' consciously extends Wan-I2V's masked temporal completion (cited explicitly in Sec. 3.1 as 'the conceptual basis'), so the presentation does not disguise a prior result as a new one. The only self-citation is MagicAnimate ([2],[51], co-authored by M.Z. Shou), used solely as one of six Table 1 baselines and in Related Work; the central claim that pretrained DiTs handle heterogeneous sequences without structural change does not rest on MagicAnimate's results, so this is a minor, non-load-bearing self-citation. Acknowledged weaknesses - the 30-video test set with no confidence intervals (Sec. 4.1.1), in-distribution synthetic testing, zero-shot U-Net baselines, and the 'inherently possess' wording despite fine-tuning - are statistical-validity and claim-precision concerns, not circularity; they belong in a correctness review rather than this pass. No equation equals its own input, no fitted value is relabeled as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' own prior work. Verdict: no significant circularity, with the score reflecting only the minor non-load-bearing MagicAnimate self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method introduces no new entities or fitted free parameters. The central claim rests on assumptions about the pretrained model's ability to handle heterogeneous inputs and the reliability of the VAE for skeleton frames, plus the standard diffusion formulation.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math The latent diffusion forward and reverse processes (Eqs. 4-6) are valid for the masked target segment.
    The paper applies standard Gaussian diffusion noise and denoising only to target tokens, which is a well-established formulation in latent diffusion models.
  • domain assumption The pretrained Wan-I2V video diffusion transformer can process heterogeneous visual inputs (reference image, skeleton frames) as ordinary video frames in a single sequence.
    The method constructs input sequence Eq. 1 and relies on the pretrained model's ability to attend over these frames; the paper validates this experimentally, but it is not derived from first principles.
  • domain assumption The 3D VAE can faithfully encode skeleton frames and reference images into latents that retain sufficient appearance and motion information.
    Skeleton frames are sparse line drawings, potentially out-of-distribution for the VAE trained on natural videos; if the VAE discards skeleton details, the motion guidance would be lost. The paper does not analyze this.
  • domain assumption The pretrained transformer uses causal attention that enforces temporal directionality, as stated in Eq. 8.
    The paper treats causal attention as an inherent property of the base model, but does not verify whether Wan-I2V actually has a causal mask over the temporal dimension. If it does not, the stated mechanism is unsubstantiated, though the method might still work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of FramePrompt: In-context Controllable Animation with Zero Structural Changes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SEUK7SC5

@misc{pith2026250617301,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: FramePrompt: In-context Controllable Animation with Zero Structural Changes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SEUK7SC5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.17301}
}
read the original abstract

Generating controllable character animation from a reference image and motion guidance remains a challenging task due to the inherent difficulty of injecting appearance and motion cues into video diffusion models. Prior works often rely on complex architectures, explicit guider modules, or multi-stage processing pipelines, which increase structural overhead and hinder deployment. Inspired by the strong visual context modeling capacity of pre-trained video diffusion transformers, we propose FramePrompt, a minimalist yet powerful framework that treats reference images, skeleton-guided motion, and target video clips as a unified visual sequence. By reformulating animation as a conditional future prediction task, we bypass the need for guider networks and structural modifications. Experiments demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms representative baselines across various evaluation metrics while also simplifying training. Our findings highlight the effectiveness of sequence-level visual conditioning and demonstrate the potential of pre-trained models for controllable animation without architectural changes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.17301 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of conditioning training strategies in video diffusion models: (a) Unified Sequential Prompting: Reference images, skeleton motions, and target frames are concatenated into a single sequence, enabling contextual modeling without architectural changes. (b) Token-wise Residual Addition: Image and pose inputs are embedded and added post-patchification, requiring dedicated encoders. (c) Channel-wise Concatena… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Inference pipeline of our Unified Sequential Framework: A reference image, a time￾ordered skeleton sequence, and zero-padded placeholder frames are concatenated into a single video clip and encoded by a 3D VAE to form spatio-temporal latents. A binary mask designates context tokens (white) to be frozen and prediction tokens (black) to be noised. Only the prediction tokens undergo iterative denoising through N DiT bl… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of different animation methods over 10 epochs in terms of SSIM ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitative comparison of animation results. From left to right: reference image, ground [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Showcase of our FramePrompt approach generating diverse animations from the TikTok dataset. Each row displays a different test case, showing sequential frames from the generated animation. Our method successfully captures a wide range of motion patterns while maintaini…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Examples of animations generated by our FramePrompt approach on the synthetic dataset. Each row demonstrates our model’s ability to faithfully reproduce complex character appearances and motion patterns while maintaining temporal consistency across frames. 2. Temporal …

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Animate anyone: Consistent and controllable image-to-video synthesis for character animation

    Li Hu, Xin Gao, Peng Zhang, Ke Sun, Bang Zhang, and Liefeng Bo. Animate anyone: Consistent and controllable image-to-video synthesis for character animation. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8153–8163, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Magicanimate: Temporally consistent human image animation using diffusion model

    Zhongcong Xu, Jianfeng Zhang, Jun Hao Liew, Hanshu Yan, Jia-Wei Liu, Chenxu Zhang, Jiashi Feng, and Mike Zheng Shou. Magicanimate: Temporally consistent human image animation using diffusion model. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 1481–1490, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Animate anyone 2: High-fidelity character image animation with environment affordance

    Li Hu, Guangyuan Wang, Zhen Shen, Xin Gao, Dechao Meng, Lian Zhuo, Peng Zhang, Bang Zhang, and Liefeng Bo. Animate anyone 2: High-fidelity character image animation with environment affordance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.06145, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Champ: Controllable and consistent human image animation with 3d parametric guidance

    Shenhao Zhu, Junming Leo Chen, Zuozhuo Dai, Zilong Dong, Yinghui Xu, Xun Cao, Yao Yao, Hao Zhu, and Siyu Zhu. Champ: Controllable and consistent human image animation with 3d parametric guidance. In European Conference on Computer Vision, volume 15113, pages 145–162, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Disco: Disentangled control for realistic human dance generation

    Tan Wang, Linjie Li, Kevin Lin, Yuanhao Zhai, Chung-Ching Lin, Zhengyuan Yang, Hanwang Zhang, Zicheng Liu, and Lijuan Wang. Disco: Disentangled control for realistic human dance generation. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 9326–9336, 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [7]

    Musepose: a pose- driven image-to-video framework for virtual human generation

    Zhengyan Tong, Chao Li, Zhaokang Chen, Bin Wu, and Wenjiang Zhou. Musepose: a pose- driven image-to-video framework for virtual human generation. arxiv, 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [8]

    https://github.com/MooreThreads/Moore-AnimateAnyone, 2024

    Moore-animateanyone. https://github.com/MooreThreads/Moore-AnimateAnyone, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [9]

    Realisdance: Equip controllable character animation with realistic hands

    Jingkai Zhou, Benzhi Wang, Weihua Chen, Jingqi Bai, Dongyang Li, Aixi Zhang, Hao Xu, Mingyang Yang, and Fan Wang. Realisdance: Equip controllable character animation with realistic hands. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.06202, 2024

    arXiv 2024

Show all 55 references
  1. [10]

    https://viggleai.io/, 2024

    Viggle ai. https://viggleai.io/, 2024

    2024

  2. [11]

    Con- trolnext: Powerful and efficient control for image and video generation

    Bohao Peng, Jian Wang, Yuechen Zhang, Wenbo Li, Ming-Chang Yang, and Jiaya Jia. Con- trolnext: Powerful and efficient control for image and video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06070, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  3. [12]

    https://github.com/aigc-apps/VideoX-Fun, 2025

    Moore-animateanyone. https://github.com/aigc-apps/VideoX-Fun, 2025

    2025

  4. [13]

    Unianimate: Taming unified video diffusion models for consistent human image animation

    Xiang Wang, Shiwei Zhang, Changxin Gao, Jiayu Wang, Xiaoqiang Zhou, Yingya Zhang, Luxin Yan, and Nong Sang. Unianimate: Taming unified video diffusion models for consistent human image animation. Science China Information Sciences , 2025

    2025

  5. [14]

    Skyreels-a1: Expressive portrait animation in video diffusion transformers

    Di Qiu, Zhengcong Fei, Rui Wang, Jialin Bai, Changqian Yu, Mingyuan Fan, Guibin Chen, and Xiang Wen. Skyreels-a1: Expressive portrait animation in video diffusion transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.10841, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  6. [15]

    Experiment with gemini 2.0 flash native image generation, 2025

    Google Gemini2. Experiment with gemini 2.0 flash native image generation, 2025

    2025

  7. [16]

    Introducing 4o image generation, 2025

    OpenAI. Introducing 4o image generation, 2025

    2025

  8. [17]

    Step1x-edit: A practical framework for general image editing

    Shiyu Liu, Yucheng Han, Peng Xing, Fukun Yin, Rui Wang, Wei Cheng, Jiaqi Liao, Yingming Wang, Honghao Fu, Chunrui Han, Guopeng Li, Yuang Peng, Quan Sun, Jingwei Wu, Yan Cai, Zheng Ge, Ranchen Ming, Lei Xia, Xianfang Zeng, Yibo Zhu, Binxing Jiao, Xiangyu Zhang, Gang Yu, and Dax...

    2025 arXiv

  9. [18]

    Nexus- gen: A unified model for image understanding, generation, and editing

    Hong Zhang, Zhongjie Duan, Xingjun Wang, Yingda Chen, Yuze Zhao, and Yu Zhang. Nexus- gen: A unified model for image understanding, generation, and editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.21356, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  10. [19]

    Video diffusion models

    Jonathan Ho, Tim Salimans, Alexey Gritsenko, William Chan, Mohammad Norouzi, and David J Fleet. Video diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.03458, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  11. [20]

    Scalable diffusion models with transformers

    William Peebles and Saining Xie. Scalable diffusion models with transformers. In Int. Conf. Comput. Vis., pages 4195–4205, 2023

    2023

  12. [21]

    Pixart- α: Fast training of diffusion transformer for photorealistic text-to-image synthesis

    Junsong Chen, Jincheng Yu, Chongjian Ge, Lewei Yao, Enze Xie, Yue Wu, Zhongdao Wang, James Kwok, Ping Luo, Huchuan Lu, et al. Pixart- α: Fast training of diffusion transformer for photorealistic text-to-image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.00426, 2023

    arXiv

  13. [22]

    Magicvideo: Efficient video generation with latent diffusion models

    Daquan Zhou, Weimin Wang, Hanshu Yan, Weiwei Lv, Yizhe Zhu, and Jiashi Feng. Magicvideo: Efficient video generation with latent diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.11018, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  14. [23]

    Modelscope text-to-video technical report

    Jiuniu Wang, Hangjie Yuan, Dayou Chen, Yingya Zhang, Xiang Wang, and Shiwei Zhang. Modelscope text-to-video technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06571, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  15. [24]

    Animatediff: Animate your personalized text-to-image diffusion models without specific tuning.International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024

    Yuwei Guo, Ceyuan Yang, Anyi Rao, Zhengyang Liang, Yaohui Wang, Yu Qiao, Maneesh Agrawala, Dahua Lin, and Bo Dai. Animatediff: Animate your personalized text-to-image diffusion models without specific tuning.International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024

    2024

  16. [25]

    GenmoTeam. Mochi 1. https://github.com/genmoai/models, 2024

    2024

  17. [26]

    Hunyuanvideo: A systematic framework for large video generative models

    Weijie Kong, Qi Tian, Zijian Zhang, Rox Min, Zuozhuo Dai, Jin Zhou, Jiangfeng Xiong, Xin Li, Bo Wu, Jianwei Zhang, et al. Hunyuanvideo: A systematic framework for large video generative models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03603, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  18. [27]

    Wan: Open and advanced large-scale video generative models

    Ang Wang, Baole Ai, Bin Wen, Chaojie Mao, Chen-Wei Xie, Di Chen, Feiwu Yu, Haiming Zhao, Jianxiao Yang, Jianyuan Zeng, Jiayu Wang, Jingfeng Zhang, Jingren Zhou, Jinkai Wang, Jixuan Chen, Kai Zhu, Kang Zhao, Keyu Yan, Lianghua Huang, Mengyang Feng, Ningyi Zhang, Pandeng Li, Pin...

    2025 arXiv

  19. [28]

    Ltx-video: Realtime video latent diffusion

    Yoav HaCohen, Nisan Chiprut, Benny Brazowski, Daniel Shalem, Dudu Moshe, Eitan Richard- son, Eran Levin, Guy Shiran, Nir Zabari, Ori Gordon, Poriya Panet, Sapir Weissbuch, Victor Kulikov, Yaki Bitterman, Zeev Melumian, and Ofir Bibi. Ltx-video: Realtime video latent diffusion....

    2024 arXiv

  20. [29]

    Open-sora: Democratizing efficient video production for all, March 2024

    Zangwei Zheng, Xiangyu Peng, Tianji Yang, Chenhui Shen, Shenggui Li, Hongxin Liu, Yukun Zhou, Tianyi Li, and Yang You. Open-sora: Democratizing efficient video production for all, March 2024

    2024

  21. [30]

    Open-sora plan: Open-source large video generation model

    Bin Lin, Yunyang Ge, Xinhua Cheng, Zongjian Li, Bin Zhu, Shaodong Wang, Xianyi He, Yang Ye, Shenghai Yuan, Liuhan Chen, et al. Open-sora plan: Open-source large video generation model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.00131, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  22. [31]

    Pyramidal flow matching for efficient video generative modeling

    Yang Jin, Zhicheng Sun, Ningyuan Li, Kun Xu, Kun Xu, Hao Jiang, Nan Zhuang, Quzhe Huang, Yang Song, Yadong Mu, and Zhouchen Lin. Pyramidal flow matching for efficient video generative modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.05954, 2024

  23. [32]

    CogVideoX: Text-to-Video Diffusion Models with An Expert Transformer

    Zhuoyi Yang, Jiayan Teng, Wendi Zheng, Ming Ding, Shiyu Huang, Jiazheng Xu, Yuanming Yang, Wenyi Hong, Xiaohan Zhang, Guanyu Feng, Da Yin, Xiaotao Gu, Yuxuan Zhang, Weihan Wang, Yean Cheng, Ting Liu, Bin Xu, Yuxiao Dong, and Jie Tang. CogVideoX: Text-to-Video Diffusion Models ...

    2025

  24. [33]

    First order motion model for image animation

    Aliaksandr Siarohin, Stéphane Lathuilière, Sergey Tulyakov, Elisa Ricci, and Nicu Sebe. First order motion model for image animation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 32, pages 7135–7145, 2019

    2019

  25. [34]

    Woodford, Jian Ren, Menglei Chai, and Sergey Tulyakov

    Aliaksandr Siarohin, Oliver J. Woodford, Jian Ren, Menglei Chai, and Sergey Tulyakov. Motion representations for articulated animation. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 13653–13662, 2021

    2021

  26. [35]

    Animate-x: Universal character image animation with enhanced motion representation

    Shuai Tan, Biao Gong, Xiang Wang, Shiwei Zhang, Dandan Zheng, Ruobing Zheng, Kecheng Zheng, Jingdong Chen, and Ming Yang. Animate-x: Universal character image animation with enhanced motion representation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10306, 2024

    arXiv

  27. [36]

    Humanvid: Demystifying training data for camera-controllable human image animation

    Zhenzhi Wang, Yixuan Li, Yanhong Zeng, Youqing Fang, Yuwei Guo, Wenran Liu, Jing Tan, Kai Chen, Tianfan Xue, Bo Dai, and Dahua Lin. Humanvid: Demystifying training data for camera-controllable human image animation. In The Thirty-eight Conference on Neural Information Processi...

    2024

  28. [37]

    Omnihuman-1: Rethinking the scaling-up of one-stage conditioned human animation models

    Gaojie Lin, Jianwen Jiang, Jiaqi Yang, Zerong Zheng, and Chao Liang. Omnihuman-1: Rethinking the scaling-up of one-stage conditioned human animation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.01061, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  29. [38]

    Humandit: Pose-guided diffusion transformer for long-form human motion video generation

    Qijun Gan, Yi Ren, Chen Zhang, Zhenhui Ye, Pan Xie, Xiang Yin, Zehuan Yuan, Bingyue Peng, and Jianke Zhu. Humandit: Pose-guided diffusion transformer for long-form human motion video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.04847, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  30. [39]

    Vace: All-in-one video creation and editing

    Zeyinzi Jiang, Zhen Han, Chaojie Mao, Jingfeng Zhang, Yulin Pan, and Yu Liu. Vace: All-in-one video creation and editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.07598, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  31. [40]

    Humandit: Pose-guided diffusion transformer for long-form human motion video generation, 2025

    Qijun Gan, Yi Ren, Chen Zhang, Zhenhui Ye, Pan Xie, Xiang Yin, Zehuan Yuan, Bingyue Peng, and Jianke Zhu. Humandit: Pose-guided diffusion transformer for long-form human motion video generation, 2025

    2025

  32. [41]

    Ominicontrol: Minimal and universal control for diffusion transformer

    Zhenxiong Tan, Songhua Liu, Xingyi Yang, Qiaochu Xue, and Xinchao Wang. Ominicontrol: Minimal and universal control for diffusion transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15098 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  33. [42]

    Ace: All-round creator and editor following instructions via diffusion transformer

    Zhen Han, Zeyinzi Jiang, Yulin Pan, Jingfeng Zhang, Chaojie Mao, Chenwei Xie, Yu Liu, and Jingren Zhou. Ace: All-round creator and editor following instructions via diffusion transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.00086, 2024

    arXiv

  34. [43]

    Lumina-omnilv: A unified multimodal framework for general low-level vision

    Yuandong Pu, Le Zhuo, Kaiwen Zhu, Liangbin Xie, Wenlong Zhang, Xiangyu Chen, Pneg Gao, Yu Qiao, Chao Dong, and Yihao Liu. Lumina-omnilv: A unified multimodal framework for general low-level vision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.04903, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  35. [44]

    I2vgen-xl: High-quality image-to-video synthesis via cascaded diffusion models

    Shiwei Zhang, Jiayu Wang, Yingya Zhang, Kang Zhao, Hangjie Yuan, Zhiwu Qin, Xiang Wang, Deli Zhao, and Jingren Zhou. I2vgen-xl: High-quality image-to-video synthesis via cascaded diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.04145, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets

    Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Sumith Kulal, Daniel Mendelevitch, Maciej Kilian, Do- minik Lorenz, Yam Levi, Zion English, Vikram V oleti, Adam Letts, et al. Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  37. [46]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. , pages 8748–8763. PMLR, 2021

    2021

  38. [47]

    Ip-adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to-image diffusion models

    Hu Ye, Jun Zhang, Sibo Liu, Xiao Han, and Wei Yang. Ip-adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to-image diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06721, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  39. [48]

    Mimicmotion: High-quality human motion video generation with confidence-aware pose guidance

    Yuang Zhang, Jiaxi Gu, Li-Wen Wang, Han Wang, Junqi Cheng, Yuefeng Zhu, and Fangyuan Zou. Mimicmotion: High-quality human motion video generation with confidence-aware pose guidance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.19680, 2024. 12

    2024 arXiv

  40. [49]

    Dispose: Disentangling pose guidance for controllable human image animation

    Hongxiang Li, Yaowei Li, Yuhang Yang, Junjie Cao, Zhihong Zhu, Xuxin Cheng, and Chen Long. Dispose: Disentangling pose guidance for controllable human image animation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.09349, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  41. [50]

    Animateanyone: Consistent human motion transfer in realistic videos

    Moore Threads. Animateanyone: Consistent human motion transfer in realistic videos. https: //github.com/MooreThreads/Moore-AnimateAnyone, 2024. Accessed: 2025-05-15

    2024

  42. [51]

    Magicanimate: Temporally consistent human image animation using diffusion model

    Zhongcong Xu, Jianfeng Zhang, Jun Hao Liew, Hanshu Yan, Jia-Wei Liu, Chenxu Zhang, Jiashi Feng, and Mike Zheng Shou. Magicanimate: Temporally consistent human image animation using diffusion model. In arXiv, 2023

    2023

  43. [52]

    Learning high fidelity depths of dressed humans by watching social media dance videos

    Yasamin Jafarian and Hyun Soo Park. Learning high fidelity depths of dressed humans by watching social media dance videos. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 12753–12762, June 2021. 13 A Experimental Details A.1 I...

    2021

  44. [53]

    15 Figure 5: Showcase of our FramePrompt approach generating diverse animations from the TikTok dataset

    Motion Diversity: Our model effectively handles a wide range of motion patterns, from expressive hand gestures and facial movements to full-body dancing motions, demonstrating its adaptability to different animation scenarios. 15 Figure 5: Showcase of our FramePrompt approach ...

  45. [54]

    Temporal Consistency: Across all examples, our method maintains smooth transitions between frames with minimal flickering or jitter, producing natural-looking animations that preserve the temporal coherence of human movements

  46. [55]

    Identity Preservation: The character appearance remains consistent throughout the anima- tion sequences, with accurate preservation of facial features, hairstyles, clothing details, and other distinctive attributes from the reference images

  47. [56]

    These visual results complement our quantitative findings, providing concrete evidence of our method’s effectiveness in generating high-quality character animations

    Cross-Domain Performance: The consistent quality across both synthetic and real-world examples demonstrates our method’s robustness to domain shifts and its effectiveness in diverse visual contexts. These visual results complement our quantitative findings, providing concrete ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.