Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 47 references

Applications of extrapolations to wavelet characterization of various function spaces and extension operators

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read On any ball Banach function space where the local Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator is bounded along with its dual, smooth wavelets give a norm equivalence between f and its square function, characterizing the X-based Sobolev space W^s_X.

desk verdict The local extrapolation theorem is real and the example list is useful, but the two advertised applications (Theorem 2.2 and Example 2.7) are not proved as stated, and Corollary 2.4 contains a false local/global equivalence; worth a referee, but only as a request for serious revision. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.09912 v2 pith:SFAQTE2Y submitted 2025-01-17 math.FA

Mitsuo Izuki , Takahiro Noi , Yoshihiro Sawano This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.FA MSC 42B3541A1726B33
keywords extrapolationwaveletRiesztransformHardy-LittlewoodmaximaloperatorMuckenhouptweightballBanachfunctionspaceSobolevextension
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that smooth wavelet expansions give a complete norm characterization of Sobolev-type spaces built on very general Banach function spaces, not only L^p and its weighted variants. Its main theorem says: if the local Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator is bounded on a ball Banach function space X and on its Köthe dual X', and the wavelets are smooth enough, then a function f in X belongs to the X-based Sobolev space $W^s_X$ exactly when the wavelet square function $Vf+W_s f$ lies in X, with equivalent norms. The proof is a short extrapolation step: one weighted wavelet inequality for every local Muckenhoupt weight is transferred to any X satisfying only maximal-boundedness conditions. The same technique yields vector-valued maximal inequalities and refines a recent extension-operator theorem by dropping the absolutely continuous norm assumption. One uniform mechanism now covers weighted Lebesgue, Lorentz, Herz, variable-exponent, Orlicz, Morrey, and Besov-Bourgain-Morrey spaces.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is an extrapolation theorem for ball Banach function spaces (Theorem 1.3): if a pair $(f,g)$ satisfies $\|f\|_{L^p(w)} \le N([w]_{A_{p,\mathrm{loc}}})\|g\|_{L^p(w)}$ for every local Muckenhoupt weight $w$, then $\|f\|_X \le C\|g\|_X$ whenever $M_{\mathrm{loc}}$ is bounded on $X$ and on its Köthe dual $X'$. A ball Banach function space is a Banach lattice of measurable functions whose norm has finite value on balls and satisfies the Fatou property. The paper feeds two weighted pairings from [22, Theorem 4.6] into this machine, comparing the wavelet square function $Vf+W_s f$ with the Bessel potential $(1-t_0^2\Delta)^{s/2}f$; the wavelets enter through square functions built from normalized cube indicators, with $Vf$ collecting coarse-scale coefficients and $W_s f$ the detail coefficients scaled by $2^{js}$. A short appendix proves Theorem 1.3 by dualizing with an iterated maximal operator that turns local maximal boundedness into a local $A_1$ weight.

What would settle it

Take a ball Banach function space $X$ with $M_{\mathrm{loc}}$ bounded on $X$ and $X'$, and a compactly supported smooth function $f$. If for some local Muckenhoupt weight $w$ the ratio $\|Vf+W_s f\|_{L^p(w)}/\|(1-t_0^2\Delta)^{s/2}f\|_{L^p(w)}$ is unbounded as the scales vary, then the pairings (2.5)-(2.6) fail and Theorem 2.2 collapses. A concrete check is to test this ratio for wavelets of exactly borderline smoothness $K=s$ on weighted Lebesgue spaces with weights in $A_{p,\mathrm{loc}}$ but not in $A_p$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is Theorem 2.2: fix $s>0$ and choose compactly supported wavelets $\phi,\psi_l$ of smoothness $K>s$. Whenever the local Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator $M_{\mathrm{loc}}$ is bounded on a ball Banach function space $X$ and on its Köthe dual $X'$, the following equivalence holds for every $f\in X$: $f$ lies in the $X$-based Sobolev space $W^s_X(R^n)$, defined by requiring the Bessel potential $(1-t_0^2\Delta)^{s/2}f$ to belong to $X$, if and only if the square function $Vf+W_s f$ belongs to $X$, and the two norms are comparable. The paper also claims that the same extrapolation setup gives a vector-valued local maximal inequality and, in Example 2.7, that the known extension operator for bounded Lipschitz domains satisfies a norm equivalence using only boundedness of $M$ on $X$ and $X'$, removing the absolutely continuous norm hypothesis required by the earlier extension-operator result it refines.

Load-bearing premise

The proof depends on a previously established weighted comparison: for every local Muckenhoupt weight, the wavelet square function and the Bessel-potential version of f satisfy the same weighted norm inequalities as f, with constants controlled by the weight's local characteristic. If that comparison fails at the required generality, the main theorem does not follow from the proof given.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every space listed in Section 3 — weighted Lebesgue, Lorentz, Herz, variable-exponent, Orlicz, Morrey, and Besov-Bourgain-Morrey — Theorem 2.2 gives $\|f\|_{W^s_X} \simeq \|Vf+W_s f\|_X$.
  • The wavelet expansion of $f$ converges to $f$ in $X$ for any separable $X$ satisfying the maximal-boundedness assumption, and for nonseparable spaces such as weak Lebesgue or Morrey spaces the convergence can be captured in an $L^\eta(w)$ space with an $A_1$ weight.
  • The extension operator is bounded from $W^k_X(D)$ to $X$ for bounded Lipschitz domains, with norm comparable to the sum of norms of $Z\partial^\alpha f$, and the absolutely continuous norm assumption in the earlier result is not needed.
  • The vector-valued local maximal inequality holds for $X$ whenever $M_{\mathrm{loc}}$ is bounded on $X$ and $X'$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The proof transfers to any operator with a known local $A_{p,\mathrm{loc}}$ weighted bound: fractional integrals or commutators would produce analogous square-function characterizations of their natural smoothness spaces without rechecking the whole lattice class.
  • Because convexification is never used, the same mechanism is a plausible template for quasi-Banach lattices and for Hardy-type spaces built from such norms, once a valid extrapolation theorem is available there.
  • The extension-operator part suggests that trace and extension theory for Sobolev spaces on non-reflexive lattices can be built from maximal-operator control alone, avoiding density of test functions that fails in spaces like Morrey spaces.
  • A sharpness test of the smoothness condition $K>s$: with wavelets at the borderline smoothness $K=s$, the weighted comparison should degrade and the equivalence should fail for some $X$; this is directly checkable by weighted $L^p$ computation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Formalized claims in Lean

  1. Claim #1: On its own terms, the paper's central claim is Theorem 2.2: fix $s>0$ and choose compactly supported wavelets $\phi,\psi_l$ of smoothness $K>s$. Whenever the local Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator $M_{\mathrm{loc}}$ is bounded on a ball Banach function space $X$ and on its Köthe dual $X'$, the following equivalence holds for every $f\in X$: $f$ lies in the $X$-based Sobolev space $W^s_X(R^n)$, de

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proves a local version of Rubio de Francia extrapolation for ball Banach function spaces (Theorem 1.3, with a self-contained appendix proof) and uses it, together with the global version (Theorem 1.1), to derive applications: a wavelet characterization of X-based Sobolev spaces (Theorem 2.2 and Corollary 2.4), a vector-valued maximal inequality (Example 2.6), and an extension-operator result on bounded Lipschitz domains (Example 2.7, claimed as a refinement of Zhu--Yang--Yuan). The advertised wavelet theorem is derived by citing the weighted wavelet result [22, Theorem 4.6] and then applying the extrapolation theorems. The paper also surveys which classical spaces (weighted Lebesgue, Lorentz, Herz, variable-exponent, Orlicz, Morrey, Besov--Bourgain--Morrey) fall under the assumptions.

Significance. If Theorem 2.2 and Example 2.7 can be made fully rigorous, the paper would provide a uniform and quite general wavelet characterization of Sobolev spaces built on ball Banach function spaces, requiring only boundedness of the local Hardy--Littlewood maximal operator on X and its Kothe dual, with no convexification and no absolute-continuity assumption. The appendix proof of Theorem 1.3 is a genuine, self-contained contribution, and the survey of applications to many concrete spaces is potentially useful. However, the central advertised wavelet theorem currently rests on a one-line citation whose hypotheses are not verified, and on a local/global Bessel-potential identification that is not established; the false Riesz-transform equivalence in Corollary 2.4 is an independent error. The significance is therefore conditional on substantial technical repair.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.1, Theorem 2.2] The proof of Theorem 2.2 is a single sentence: after fixing 0<t0≪1, it asserts that (2.5) and (2.6) follow from [22, Theorem 4.6], and ends. This is not a proof as written. First, the cited theorem is a weighted statement for functions lying in certain weighted Sobolev spaces L^{p,s}(w) with w in the local Muckenhoupt class, but the present theorem must hold for arbitrary f∈X, and no argument is given that an arbitrary f∈X (or f∈W^s_X) belongs to any class to which [22, Theorem 4.6] applies, nor that the quantities ((1−t0²Δ)^{s/2}f, Vf+W_s f) are a pair of measurable functions (i.e., an element of L^0(R^n)^2) as required by the definition of F_loc. Second, the theorem statement uses W^s_X defined via the global Bessel potential (1−Δ)^{s/2} in Definition 2.1, while the pairings (2.5)--(2.6) use the local operator (1−t0²Δ)^{s/2}; the equivalence of the two Sobolev norms under only M_loc-boundedness is neither proved nor obvious, since the Fourier multipliers differ by a global zero-order factor. The claimed equivalence of norms therefore does not follow from the displayed argument. The theorem may be repairable by reformulating W^s_X with (1−t0²Δ)^{s/2} and proving a bridge between the local and global potential, or by citing a weighted wavelet theorem that directly uses (1−Δ)^{s/2}, but as it stands the central claim is not established.
  2. [§2.1, Corollary 2.4] The statement 'Assume that M_loc is bounded on X and on X′, or equivalently, each R_j is bounded on X' is false. For X=L^p(w) with w(x)=e^{|x|}, one has w∈A_{p,loc}∖A_p, so M_loc is bounded on X and X′, but the global Riesz transforms R_j are unbounded on L^p(w); this is exactly the classical distinction between local and global Muckenhoupt classes. The equivalence stated in the corollary is Rutsky's theorem for the global maximal operator M, not for M_loc. This incorrect equivalence should be removed or replaced by the correct global statement, and the corollary should state the wavelet equivalence under the M_loc assumption alone if that is what is intended.
  3. [§2.3, Example 2.7] The assertion 'Let f∈W^k_X(D). Then f∈L^{p,k}(w,D) for some w∈A_1' is not proved and does not follow immediately from the stated assumptions. The natural route is the embedding X↪L^η(w) with w∈A_1 mentioned in Remark 1.4, taking p=η and applying the embedding to f and all its derivatives up to order k, but this argument is absent. Without it, the operator Λf is not defined and the claimed norm equivalence ‖Λf‖_X∼∑_{|α|≤k}‖Z∂^α f‖_X is unjustified. This is load-bearing for the advertised refinement of [47, Theorem 5.4], since the entire purpose of the example is to remove the absolute-continuity hypothesis while retaining the extension property.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.1, Theorem 2.2] The parameter t0 appears only in the proof ('Let 0<t0≪1'), but the statement of Theorem 2.2 does not mention t0 or its relation to the wavelet scale J; the statement should either incorporate t0 explicitly or explain why the equivalence is independent of its choice.
  2. [Remark 1.4] The sentence 'we can establish֒→Lη(w) for some w∈A1' is incomplete due to a garbled embedding symbol; it should read 'we can establish an embedding of X into L^η(w) for some w∈A_1.'
  3. [§4, equation (4.4)] The displayed inequality contains a typo: the middle expression '[R_{g+f}^{1-p}R'_h]_{A1,loc}' is not the right object; the intended factorization is [R_{g+f}^{1-p}R'_h]_{A_{p,loc}} ≤ [R_{g+f}]^{p-1}_{A_{1,loc}} [R'_h]_{A_{1,loc}}.
  4. [References] Reference [34] contains the garbled name 'M. Masty/suppress lo'; this should be corrected to 'M. Mastyło'.
  5. [§3.1] The sentence 'This condition also applies to the weight W' is ambiguous; it should explicitly state that for W(x)=max(1,|x|)^α the membership condition is also −n<α<n(q−1).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: Theorem 2.2 applies a published weighted wavelet equivalence through extrapolation; the proof's gaps are correctness concerns, not equation-level circularity.

full rationale

The central claim (Theorem 2.2) is not obtained by fitting or by definition. The proof asserts (2.5)-(2.6) from [22, Theorem 4.6], a published, parameter-free weighted theorem for local Muckenhoupt weights, and then relies on Theorem 1.3 (extrapolation on ball Banach function spaces) to transfer the norm equivalence to X. The cited theorem's assumptions do not contain the ball-Banach-space conclusion, so the transfer is substantive rather than a renaming. No displayed equation in the paper is identical to its input by construction; the wavelet square function and the Bessel potential are independent objects. The proof is certainly terse: it does not verify that arbitrary f in X yields pairings in F_loc, and it silently uses (1 - t0^2 Delta)^(s/2) in the pairings while Definition 2.1 defines W^s_X via (1 - Delta)^(s/2); Corollary 2.4 also asserts an equivalence with Riesz boundedness that is not proved. These are correctness and rigor risks under the stated hypotheses, not instances of the conclusion being assumed in the input. Self-citations occur ([19], [22], [41], [34]), including an in-preparation item [34] used for an embedding in Example 2.7; heavy reliance on overlapping-author prior work weakens independent verification but does not, on the quoted evidence, make the derivation circular, since the cited weighted theorem is externally checkable and does not state the target X result. Overall: no significant circularity; the score reflects self-citation load, not circular reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's claims rest on several cited theorems rather than on new derivations. The most important is the weighted wavelet equivalence from [22, Theorem 4.6], which is by the same research group; it is an independent published result, but it is not reproduced here. The extrapolation theorems themselves are known, and the examples in Section 3 rely on standard boundedness results for each space.

free parameters (2)
  • t0 = 0 < t0 << 1
    An unspecified small constant in the operator (1 - t0^2 Delta)^(s/2) in Theorem 2.2; any sufficiently small value works, so it is a proof parameter rather than a fitted number.
  • alpha in the appendix proof of Theorem 1.3 = alpha > 2 (beta [W]^{p'}_{A_{p,loc}})^(1/p) / ||M_loc||
    Chosen sufficiently large to make the series (4.13) converge; it is an auxiliary proof parameter, not fitted to data.
assumptions (9)
  • standard math Ball Banach function norm axioms (P1)-(P5) and Kothe duality X = (X')' hold for the spaces considered.
    Section 1 defines ball Banach function spaces and the appendix dualizes against X' using X = (X')' from [42].
  • standard math Theorem 1.1, the global extrapolation theorem, is valid as stated, credited to [7], [4], and [36].
    The paper restates this known theorem and does not prove it; Corollary 1.2 relies on it.
  • standard math Rutsky's characterization [38]: M is bounded on X and X' iff every Riesz transform R_j is bounded on X.
    Used in Corollary 1.2 and in the hypotheses of the extension operator example.
  • domain assumption Weighted wavelet pairings (2.5) and (2.6) from [22, Theorem 4.6] hold for all w in A_{p,loc} with constants depending only on [w].
    This is the load-bearing input for Theorem 2.2; the paper does not reproduce or verify its hypotheses.
  • standard math Bessel potential estimates: (1 - Delta)^(-s/2) is bounded on X and satisfies |(1 - Delta)^(-s/2) f| bounded by Mf, from [42].
    Used to define W^s_X as a Banach space in Section 2.
  • standard math Chua's extension theorem [6] gives (Lambda f, sum_{|alpha| <= k} |Z partial^alpha f|) in F with a suitable N(.).
    Used in Example 2.7 but not stated precisely.
  • standard math Lerner's local weighted maximal inequality (4.12) with constant beta [W]^{p'}_{A_{p,loc}} holds for local A_{p,loc} weights.
    Used in the appendix proof of Theorem 1.3; cited to [28].
  • domain assumption If M is bounded on X and X', then X embeds into L^eta(w) for some w in A1, as stated in Remark 1.4 from [29], [34], and [41].
    Underpins the claim in Example 2.7 that f in W^k_X(D) belongs to L^{p,k}(D,w) for some A1 weight.
  • domain assumption The boundedness facts for each example space in Section 3, such as M and R_j being bounded on Lorentz, Herz, Morrey, Orlicz, variable exponent, and Besov-Bourgain-Morrey spaces, are taken from the cited literature and are not reproved.
    These are needed to apply Theorems 1.1 and 1.3 to each space.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Applications of extrapolations to wavelet characterization of various function spaces and extension operators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SFAQTE2Y

@misc{pith2026250109912,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Applications of extrapolations to wavelet characterization of various function spaces and extension operators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SFAQTE2Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.09912}
}
read the original abstract

The aim of this paper is to apply an extrapolation result without relying on convexification. We characterize ball Banach function spaces in terms of wavelets, formulated in a way that takes into account the smoothness properties of the spaces under consideration. The same technique can also be applied to prove vector-valued inequalities, for example. Furthermore, the result presented here refines a recent extension operator result by Zhu, Yang, and Yuan.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [22]

    Izuki, T

    M. Izuki, T. Nogayama, T. Noi and Y. Sawano, Wavelet char acterization of local Mucken- houpt weighted Sobolev spaces with variable exponents, Constructive Approx. 57 (2022), 161–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00365-022-09573-6 [5, 7] W A VELET CHARACTERIZATION AND EXTENSION OPERATORS 19

    work page doi:10.1007/s00365-022-09573-6 2022

  2. [1]

    H. A. Aimar, A. L. Bernardis, and F. J. Mart´ ın-Reyes, Multiresolution approximations and wavelet bases of weighted Lp spaces, J. Fourier Anal. Appl. , 9 (2003), 497–510. [1]

    work page 2003

  3. [2]

    Bergh and J

    J. Bergh and J. L¨ ofstr¨ om, Interpolation spaces. An introduction. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, No. 223. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1976

    work page 1976

  4. [3]

    Bennett and R

    C. Bennett and R. Sharpley, Interpolation of Operators, Academic Press, 1988. ISBN: 9780123994585. [10]

    work page 1988

  5. [4]

    M. M. Cao, J. J. Mar´ ın, and J. M. Martell, Extrapolation o n function and modular spaces, and applications, Adv. Math., 406 (2022), 108520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2022.108520. [4]

    arXiv 2022

  6. [5]

    Chiarenza and M

    F. Chiarenza and M. Frasca, Morrey spaces and Hardy–Litt lewood maximal function, Rend. Mat. , 7 (1987), 273–279. [3, 9]

    work page 1987

  7. [6]

    S. K. Chua, Extension theorems on weighted Sobolev space s, Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 41 (1992), 1027–1076. [14]

    work page 1992

  8. [7]

    Extrapolation and Factorization

    D. Cruz-Uribe, Extrapolation and Factorization. Funct ion Spaces, Embeddings and Extrapolation X, Paseky 2017. Edited by Lukes, J. and Pick, L. Prague: Matfy zpress, Charles University, 2017, 45–92. arXiv:1706.02620. [9]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

Show all 47 references
  1. [8]

    Cruz-Uribe, A

    D. Cruz-Uribe, A. Fiorenza, and C. J. Neugebauer, Weight ed norm inequalities for the maximal operator on variable Lebesgue spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 394 (2012), 744–760. [3]

    2012

  2. [9]

    Cruz-Uribe, SFO and L.-W

    D. Cruz-Uribe, SFO and L.-W. Wang, Extrapolation and wei ghted norm inequalities in the variable Lebesgue spaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 369 (2016), 1205–1235. [11]

    2016

  3. [10]

    G. P. Curbera, J. Garc´ ıa-Cuerva, J. M. Martell, and C. P ´ erez, Extrapolation with weights, rearrangement-invariant function spaces, modular inequalities, and applications to singular integrals, Adv. Math., 203 (2006), 256–318. [11]

    2006

  4. [11]

    C. Deng, J. W. Sun, and B. Li, Extrapolations on ball Bana ch function spaces and applications, Ann. Funct. Anal. , 14 (2023), no. 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43034-022-00236-y. [3][3]

    2023 doi

  5. [12]

    Duoandikoetxea, Fourier Analysis, Graduate Studie s in Mathematics, vol

    J. Duoandikoetxea, Fourier Analysis, Graduate Studie s in Mathematics, vol. 29, American Mathe- matical Society, Providence, RI, 2001. Translated and revi sed from the 1995 Spanish original by D. Cruz-Uribe. [13]

    2001

  6. [13]

    Garc´ ıa-Cuerva and J

    J. Garc´ ıa-Cuerva and J. M. Martell, Wavelet characterization of weighted spaces, J. Geom. Anal. , 11 (2001), 241–264. [1]

    2001

  7. [14]

    Hatano, T

    N. Hatano, T. Nogayama, Y. Sawano, and D. I. Hakim, Bourg ain–Morrey spaces and their applica- tions to boundedness of operators, J. Funct. Anal. , 284 (2023), Paper No. 109720, 52 pp. [15]

    2023

  8. [15]

    Hern´ andez and G

    E. Hern´ andez and G. Weiss, A First Course on Wavelets, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL., 1996. [6, 7]

    1996

  9. [16]

    Hern´ andez, G

    E. Hern´ andez, G. Weiss, and D. Yang, The ϕ -transform and wavelet characterizations of Herz-type spaces, Collect. Math. , 47 (1996), 285–320. [2, 10]

    1996

  10. [17]

    Ho, Generalized Boyds indices and applications, Analysis (Munich), 32 (2012), 97–106

    K.-P. Ho, Generalized Boyds indices and applications, Analysis (Munich), 32 (2012), 97–106. [3]

    2012

  11. [18]

    Izuki, Wavelets and modular inequalities in variabl e Lp spaces, Georgian Math

    M. Izuki, Wavelets and modular inequalities in variabl e Lp spaces, Georgian Math. J. , 15 (2008), 281–293. [2]

    2008

  12. [19]

    Izuki, The characterization of weighted Sobolev spa ces, Taiwanese J

    M. Izuki, The characterization of weighted Sobolev spa ces, Taiwanese J. Math. 13 (2009), 467–492. [5, 7]

    2009

  13. [20]

    Izuki, Boundedness of sublinear operators on Herz sp aces with variable exponent and application to wavelet characterization, Analysis Mathematica, 36 (2010), 33–50

    M. Izuki, Boundedness of sublinear operators on Herz sp aces with variable exponent and application to wavelet characterization, Analysis Mathematica, 36 (2010), 33–50. [1, 12]

    2010

  14. [21]

    Izuki, E

    M. Izuki, E. Nakai, and Y. Sawano, Wavelet characteriza tion and modular inequalities for weighted Lebesgue spaces with variable exponent, Annales Academia Scientiarum Fennica Mathematica , 40 (2015), 551–571. [1, 8, 11]

    2015

  15. [23]

    Izuki and T

    M. Izuki and T. Noi, Two weighted Herz spaces with variab le exponents, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc., 43 (2020), No.1, 169–200. [13]

    2020

  16. [24]

    Izuki, T

    M. Izuki, T. Noi, and Y. Sawano, Extrapolation to two-we ighted Herz spaces with three variable exponents, Advances in Operator Theory , 9(2) (2024), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43036-024- 00130-9 [12, 13]

    2024 doi

  17. [25]

    Izuki and K

    M. Izuki and K. Tachizawa, Wavelet characterizations o f weighted Herz spaces, Sci. Math. Jpn. , 67 (2008), 353–363. [1, 10]

    2008

  18. [26]

    A. Yu. Karlovich, Wavelet bases in Banach function spaces, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. , 44 (2021), 3, 1669–1689. [8]

    2021

  19. [27]

    T. S. Kopaliani, Greediness of the wavelet system in Lp(t)(R), East J. Approx. , 14 (2008), 59–67. [2]

    2008

  20. [28]

    Lerner, An elementary approach to several results on the Hardy–Littlewood maximal operator

    A.K. Lerner, An elementary approach to several results on the Hardy–Littlewood maximal operator. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 136 (2008), no. 8, 2829–2833. [17]

    2008

  21. [29]

    A. K. Lerner and C. P´ erez, A new characterization of the Muckenhoupt Ap weights through an extension of the Lorentz–Shimogaki theorem, Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 56 (2007), no. 6, 2697–2722. [3]

    2007

  22. [30]

    P. G. Lemari´ e-Rieusset, Ondelettes et poids de Muckenhoupt, Studia Math. , 108 (1994), 127–147. [1, 7]

    1994

  23. [31]

    Lu and D

    S. Lu and D. Yang, Oscillatory singular integrals on Har dy spaces associated with Herz spaces, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 123 (1995), 1695–1701. [10]

    1995

  24. [32]

    Lu and D

    S. Lu and D. Yang, Some characterizations of weighted Herz-type Hardy spaces and their applications, Acta Math. Sinica (N.S.), 13 (1997), 45–58. [10]

    1997

  25. [33]

    Lu and D

    S. Lu and D. Yang, Boundedness of sublinear operators in Herz spaces on Vilenkin groups and its application, Math. Nachr. , 191 (1998), 229–246. [10]

    1998

  26. [34]

    Masty/suppress lo and Y

    M. Masty/suppress lo and Y. Sawano, The Navier–Stokes equation in some general Banach spaces, in prepa- ration. [3, 9]

  27. [35]

    Meyer, Wavelets and Operators, Cambridge Universit y Press, Cambridge, 1992

    Y. Meyer, Wavelets and Operators, Cambridge Universit y Press, Cambridge, 1992. [6, 7]

    1992

  28. [36]

    Nieraeth, Extrapolation in general quasi-Banach fu nction spaces, J

    Z. Nieraeth, Extrapolation in general quasi-Banach fu nction spaces, J. Funct. Anal. 285 (2023), no. 10, 110130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2023.110130 [3]

    2023

  29. [37]

    Nieraeth, The Muckenhoupt Condition

    Z. Nieraeth, The Muckenhoupt Condition. 2024. https:/ /arxiv.org/pdf/2405.20907. [3]

    2024

  30. [38]

    D. V. Rutsky, A1-regularity and boundedness of Riesz transforms in Banach l attices of measurable functions, Zap. Nauchn. Sem. S.-Peterburg. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov. (POMI), 447 (2016), 113–122. [2]

    2016

  31. [39]

    Sawano, Wavelet characterization of Besov-Morrey a nd Triebel-Lizorkin-Morrey spaces, Funct

    Y. Sawano, Wavelet characterization of Besov-Morrey a nd Triebel-Lizorkin-Morrey spaces, Funct. Approx. Comment. Math., 38, part 1, 93–107 (2008) [14]

    2008

  32. [40]

    Sawano, Theory of Besov Spaces, Springer, 2018

    Y. Sawano, Theory of Besov Spaces, Springer, 2018. [5]

    2018

  33. [41]

    Sawano, Factorization of Hardy spaces using the ball Banach spaces, In: Conference Proceedings ”The 50, 70, 80,

    Y. Sawano, Factorization of Hardy spaces using the ball Banach spaces, In: Conference Proceedings ”The 50, 70, 80, . . . ∞ Conference in Mathematics” (Karlstad, Sweden, 2024), pp. 240-254, Element, Zagreb, 2024. [3]

    2024

  34. [42]

    Sawano, G

    Y. Sawano, G. Di Fazio, and D. I. Hakim, Morrey Spaces. Vo l. I. Introduction and applications to integral operators and PDE’s, Monographs and Research Note s in Mathematics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2020), 479 pp. ISBN: 978-1-4987-6551-0; 978-0-4 29-08592-5. [3, 5, 9, 10, 14, 16]

    2020

  35. [43]

    Sawano, K.-P

    Y. Sawano, K.-P. Ho, D. Yang and S. Yang, Hardy spaces for ball quasi-Banach function spaces. Dissertationes Math. (Rozprawy Mat.) 525, 1–102 (2017) [2]

    2017

  36. [44]

    Sawano and H

    Y. Sawano and H. Tanaka, Predual spaces of Morrey spaces with non-doubling measures, Tokyo J. Math. 32 (2009), 471–486. [14]

    2009

  37. [45]

    Soardi, Wavelet bases in rearrangement invariant fu nction spaces, Proc

    P. Soardi, Wavelet bases in rearrangement invariant fu nction spaces, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 125 (1997), 3669–3673. [10, 14]

    1997

  38. [46]

    Y. Zhao, J. Tao, D. Yang, W. Yuan, and Y. Sawano, Bourgain –Morrey Spaces mixed with structure of Besov spaces, Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. , 323 (2024), 244–295. [15]

    2024

  39. [47]

    Zhu, D.C

    C.F. Zhu, D.C. Yang and W. Yuan, Bourgain-Brezis-Miron escu-type characterization of inhomoge- neous ball Banach Sobolev spaces on extension domains, J. Geom. Anal. 34 (2024), no. 10, Paper No. 295, 70 pp. [5, 6, 9] 20 MITSUO IZUKI, TAKAHIRO NOI AND YOSHIHIRO SA W ANO F aculty...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.