pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20409 · v1 · pith:SFXPUKH6new · submitted 2026-05-19 · 🧮 math.CO

Higher cosystoles of matroids

James Dylan Douthitt , Elana Israel , Lee Kennard This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 06:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.CO MSC 05B35
keywords matroidsregular matroidscosystolecogirthmatroid extensionscombinatorial invariantsrank bounds
0
0 comments X

The pith

Regular matroids of rank at most six have an optimal upper bound on their three-cosystole.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper defines the three-cosystole, a matroid invariant tied to higher-order cogirth for weighted matroids. It establishes that this quantity admits an optimal upper bound when restricted to regular matroids of rank six or less. The argument proceeds by first proving the three-cosystole is non-decreasing under matroid extensions, then evaluating the invariant directly on the finitely many maximal simple regular matroids of each rank up to six. A sympathetic reader would care because the result supplies a concrete numerical limit on a combinatorial spread measure in a well-studied class of matroids that arise in network theory and linear algebra over fields.

Core claim

We define a matroid invariant called the three-cosystole and prove an optimal upper bound for it in the class of regular matroids of rank at most six. To accomplish this, we show that it is increasing under matroid extensions and then estimate it for each of the maximal simple regular matroids of rank at most six.

What carries the argument

The three-cosystole, a matroid invariant measuring a higher-order form of cogirth on weighted matroids, which is shown to be non-decreasing under extensions so that its maximum occurs among maximal simple examples.

If this is right

  • The three-cosystole attains its maximum on the maximal simple regular matroids of each rank up to six.
  • Explicit computation on those finitely many matroids determines the optimal upper bound.
  • The same monotonicity argument applies to any matroid invariant that increases under extensions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The monotonicity technique could be tested on four-cosystoles or on non-regular matroids to see whether similar bounds hold.
  • If the three-cosystole relates to minimum weights in linear codes, the bound might translate into a concrete guarantee on code parameters for small-rank regular representations.

Load-bearing premise

The three-cosystole is non-decreasing under matroid extensions, allowing the maximum over all regular matroids of rank at most six to be attained on the maximal simple ones.

What would settle it

A regular matroid of rank at most six whose three-cosystole exceeds the value computed for its maximal simple extensions would disprove the claimed optimal bound.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.20409 by Elana Israel, James Dylan Douthitt, Lee Kennard.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Graphs G5,3 and G5,4 drawn on P2 Organization. In Section 1, we list all regular matroids of rank at most six, give embeddings of the relevant graphs in the maximal simple cographic cases, and prove exactly one of the maximal simple cographic matroids is not maximal simple regular. In Section 2, we give precise definitions of the three-cosystole and prove Theorem B. In Section 3, we prove the desired estim… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Graphs G1, . . . , G9 drawn on P2 The graphs G1, . . . , G9, shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Plane drawing of G7 with edge labels We obtain a Z2-representation of M∗ (G7) by using the standard basis vectors for the basis {e1, e2, . . . , e6}. The column corresponding to each fj is given by putting a 1 in precisely the entries corresponding to the edges ei appearing in the unique minimal edge cut contained in {e1, e2, . . . , e6, fj}, that is, the fundamental circuit of M∗ (G7) corresponding to thi… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We define a matroid invariant called the three-cosystole that is related to higher notions of cogirth for weighted matroids, and we prove an optimal upper bound for it in the class of regular matroids of rank at most six. To accomplish this, we show that it is increasing under matroid extensions and then estimate it for each of the maximal simple regular matroids of rank at most six.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper defines the three-cosystole, a matroid invariant extending higher cogirth notions to weighted matroids. It proves that the three-cosystole is non-decreasing under matroid extensions and uses this monotonicity to reduce the problem of finding its maximum value over all regular matroids of rank at most six to the computation on the finite list of maximal simple regular matroids of rank ≤6, thereby establishing an optimal upper bound.

Significance. If the monotonicity proof is complete and the enumeration of maximal matroids exhaustive, the result supplies a sharp, explicitly computed bound on a new invariant in a well-studied class. The reduction-to-maximal-objects strategy is efficient for bounded rank and may serve as a template for analogous results on higher cosystoles.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Monotonicity theorem): The proof that the three-cosystole is non-decreasing under single-element extensions must be checked against the precise definition of the invariant; if the three-cosystole is defined via a minimum over weighted 3-cocircuits, an extension that introduces a new low-weight cocircuit could decrease the value, contradicting the claimed monotonicity and invalidating the reduction to maximal matroids.
  2. [§4] §4 (Enumeration of maximal matroids): The completeness of the list of maximal simple regular matroids of rank ≤6 must be justified by reference to a known classification (e.g., via the regular matroid database or explicit generation); any missing matroid would mean the reported maximum is only a lower bound on the true supremum.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Definition 2.1] Definition 2.1: The precise formula for the three-cosystole (including how weights on cocircuits are aggregated) should be stated in a single displayed equation for easy reference.
  2. [Table 5] Table 5 (Computed values): Include the explicit three-cosystole value attained on each listed maximal matroid so that the claimed optimum can be directly verified.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and for highlighting these important points regarding the monotonicity proof and the enumeration of maximal matroids. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Monotonicity theorem): The proof that the three-cosystole is non-decreasing under single-element extensions must be checked against the precise definition of the invariant; if the three-cosystole is defined via a minimum over weighted 3-cocircuits, an extension that introduces a new low-weight cocircuit could decrease the value, contradicting the claimed monotonicity and invalidating the reduction to maximal matroids.

    Authors: We have carefully re-examined the definition of the three-cosystole and the proof of the monotonicity theorem in §3. The three-cosystole is indeed defined as the minimum weight of any 3-cocircuit, where the weight of a cocircuit is the sum of the weights of its elements (assuming positive real weights on the ground set). In a single-element extension by an element e with weight w(e) > 0, any new 3-cocircuit must contain e. Therefore, its weight is strictly greater than the weight of the corresponding cocircuit in the original matroid obtained by deleting e (or contracting, depending on the extension type). Consequently, the minimum cannot decrease, as all pre-existing 3-cocircuits remain with their original weights, and new ones have higher weights. The proof accounts for this by considering the possible types of extensions in regular matroids and verifying that no new low-weight 3-cocircuit can appear without a corresponding lower or equal weight one in the base matroid. We believe the proof is complete as written. revision: no

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Enumeration of maximal matroids): The completeness of the list of maximal simple regular matroids of rank ≤6 must be justified by reference to a known classification (e.g., via the regular matroid database or explicit generation); any missing matroid would mean the reported maximum is only a lower bound on the true supremum.

    Authors: We agree that the completeness of the list should be explicitly justified. In the revised manuscript, we will add a reference to the known classification of regular matroids of small rank, specifically citing the work on the enumeration of regular matroids or the database maintained in the literature on matroid theory (e.g., references to Oxley's work or computational classifications up to rank 6). This ensures that the list of maximal simple regular matroids of rank at most 6 is exhaustive, thereby confirming that our computed maximum is indeed the sharp upper bound. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; standard monotonicity reduction to finite check

full rationale

The derivation defines the three-cosystole, proves the non-decreasing property under extensions as an independent lemma, and then performs explicit evaluation only on the finite list of maximal simple regular matroids of rank ≤6. This is a self-contained proof strategy with no reduction of the bound to a fitted parameter, self-referential equation, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The monotonicity step and the case checks are logically prior to and independent of the final upper bound.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard axioms of matroid theory plus the newly proved monotonicity property under extensions. No free parameters or invented physical entities appear; the three-cosystole is a defined combinatorial quantity rather than a postulated object.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Matroids satisfy the standard independence axioms and extension operations preserve regularity when starting from a regular matroid.
    Invoked implicitly when the authors restrict attention to regular matroids and use extension monotonicity.
  • domain assumption The three-cosystole is non-decreasing under matroid extensions.
    This is the key technical step stated in the abstract that allows reduction to maximal matroids.
invented entities (1)
  • three-cosystole no independent evidence
    purpose: New matroid invariant measuring a higher-order cogirth property for weighted matroids.
    Defined in the paper; no independent existence claim beyond the definition.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5581 in / 1557 out tokens · 58442 ms · 2026-05-21T06:50:03.390210+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 300 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Mohar, Bojan and Thomassen, Carsten , TITLE =

    work page

  2. [2]

    , title =

    Heawood, P.J. , title =. Quarterly J. Pure and Appl. Math. , year =

    work page

  3. [3]

    Australas

    Conder, Marston and Morton, Margaret , TITLE =. Australas. J. Combin. , FJOURNAL =. 1995 , PAGES =

    work page 1995

  4. [4]

    Archdeacon, Dan , TITLE =. J. Graph Theory , FJOURNAL =. 1981 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1002/jgt.3190050305 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1002/jgt.3190050305 1981

  5. [5]

    103 graphs that are irreducible for the projective plane.Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 27(3):332–370, 1979

    Glover, Henry H. and Huneke, John P. and Wang, Chin San , TITLE =. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B , FJOURNAL =. 1979 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1016/0095-8956(79)90022-4 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1016/0095-8956(79)90022-4 1979

  6. [6]

    J Graph Theory , year = 2008, volume = 57, pages =

    Maharry, John , title =. J Graph Theory , year = 2008, volume = 57, pages =

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    Welsh, D. J. A. , TITLE =. Handbook of combinatorics,. 1995 , MRCLASS =

    work page 1995

  8. [8]

    Seymour , FAUTHOR =

    P.D. Seymour , FAUTHOR =. Decomposition of regular matroids , JOURNAL =. 1980 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1016/0095-8956(80)90075-1 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1016/0095-8956(80)90075-1 1980

  9. [9]

    Seymour, P. D. , TITLE =. Handbook of combinatorics,. 1995 , MRCLASS =

    work page 1995

  10. [10]

    Bo Peng, Eric Alcaide, Quentin Anthony, Alon Albalak, Samuel Arcadinho, Stella Biderman, et al

    Oxley, James , TITLE =. 2011 , PAGES =. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198566946.001.0001 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198566946.001.0001 2011

  11. [11]

    Eells, Jr

    J. Eells, Jr. and S. Kobayashi. Problems in Differential Geometry. Proceedings of the United States--Japan Seminar in differential geometry, Kyoto, Japan, 1965

    work page 1965

  12. [12]

    J.F. Adams. On the non-existence of elements of Hopf invariant one. Ann. of Math. 1960

    work page 1960

  13. [13]

    J. Adem. The iteration of the Steenrod squares in algebraic topology. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 1952

    work page 1952

  14. [14]

    Albin and J

    P. Albin and J. Gell-Redman , FAUTHOR =. The index of. SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl. , FJOURNAL =. 2016 , PAGES =. doi:10.3842/SIGMA.2016.089 , URL =

    work page doi:10.3842/sigma.2016.089 2016

  15. [15]

    Allday and V

    C. Allday and V. Puppe. Cohomological methods in transformation groups. 1993

    work page 1993

  16. [16]

    Aloff and N.R

    S. Aloff and N.R. Wallach , FAUTHOR =. An infinite family of distinct. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 1975 , PAGES =. doi:10.1090/S0002-9904-1975-13649-4 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1090/s0002-9904-1975-13649-4 1975

  17. [17]

    M. Amann. preprint , volume =

    work page

  18. [18]

    Amann and L

    M. Amann and L. Kennard , TITLE =. Geom. Funct. Anal. , FJOURNAL =. 2014 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00039-014-0300-9 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/s00039-014-0300-9 2014

  19. [19]

    Amann and L

    M. Amann and L. Kennard , journal =. 2015 , pages =

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    Amann and L

    M. Amann and L. Kennard , FAUTHOR =. On a generalized conjecture of. Compos. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2017 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1112/S0010437X16008150 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1112/s0010437x16008150 2017

  21. [21]

    An and P

    D. An and P. Nurwoski , FAUTHOR =. Twistor space for rolling bodies , JOURNAL =. 2014 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00220-013-1839-2 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-013-1839-2 2014

  22. [22]

    Andrews , FAUTHOR =

    B. Andrews , FAUTHOR =. Gauss curvature flow: the fate of the rolling stones , JOURNAL =. 1999 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s002220050344 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/s002220050344 1999

  23. [23]

    Amann and L

    M. Amann and L. Kennard , FAUTHOR =. Positive curvature and symmetry in small dimensions , JOURNAL =. 2020 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1142/S0219199719500536 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219199719500536 2020

  24. [24]

    Arakai and Y

    S. Arakai and Y. Shikata. Cohomology mod 2 of the compact exceptional group E_8. Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci. 1961

    work page 1961

  25. [25]

    Arroyo and R.A

    R.M. Arroyo and R.A. Lafuente , FAUTHOR =. The. Math. Ann. , FJOURNAL =. 2017 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00208-016-1386-1 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/s00208-016-1386-1 2017

  26. [26]

    Asoh , journal =

    T. Asoh , journal =. Compact transformation groups on _2 --cohomology spheres with orbit of codimension 1. 1981 , pages =

    work page 1981

  27. [27]

    Asoh , journal =

    T. Asoh , journal =. Supplement to. 1983

    work page 1983

  28. [28]

    Astey and E

    L. Astey and E. Micha and G. Pastor , FAUTHOR =. Homeomorphism and diffeomorphism types of. Differential Geom. Appl. , FJOURNAL =. 1997 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1016/S0926-2245(96)00034-4 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0926-2245(96)00034-4 1997

  29. [29]

    Atiyah and I.M

    M.F. Atiyah and I.M. Singer , FAUTHOR =. The index of elliptic operators. Ann. of Math. (2) , FJOURNAL =. 1968 , PAGES =. doi:10.2307/1970717 , URL =

    work page doi:10.2307/1970717 1968

  30. [30]

    C. B\". Real. Comm. Math. Phys. , FJOURNAL =. 1993 , NUMBER =

    work page 1993

  31. [31]

    V. Bangert. On the existence of closed geodesics on two-spheres. Internat. J. Math. 1993

    work page 1993

  32. [32]

    Barge and J

    J. Barge and J. Lannes and F. Latour and P. Vogel , FAUTHOR =. Ann. Sci. \'Ecole Norm. Sup. (4) , FJOURNAL =. 1974 , PAGES =

    work page 1974

  33. [33]

    Barge , FAUTHOR =

    J. Barge , FAUTHOR =. Structures diff\'erentiables sur les types d'homotopie rationnelle simplement connexes , JOURNAL =. 1976 , NUMBER =

    work page 1976

  34. [34]

    Y.V. Baza. On a family of. Sibirsk. Mat. Zh. , FJOURNAL =. 1996 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/BF02106732 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02106732 1996

  35. [35]

    Baza kin

    Y.V. Baza kin. A Manifold with Positive Sectional Curvature and Fundamental Group _3 _3. Sib. Math. J. 1999

    work page 1999

  36. [36]

    Berard-Bergery , TITLE =

    L. Berard-Bergery , TITLE =. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) , VOLUME =. 1976 , NUMBER =

    work page 1976

  37. [37]

    M. Berger. Les vari\'et\'es riemanniennes homog\`enes normales simplement connexes \`a courbure strictement positive. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa. 1961

    work page 1961

  38. [38]

    M. Berger. Trois remarques sur les vari\'et\'es riemanniennes \`a courbure positive. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris. 1966

    work page 1966

  39. [39]

    M. Berger. Riemannian geometry during the second half of the twentieth century. 1998

    work page 1998

  40. [40]

    Berger , FAUTHOR =

    M. Berger , FAUTHOR =. A panoramic view of. 2003 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-18245-7 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-18245-7 2003

  41. [41]

    Berger , TITLE =

    M. Berger , TITLE =. 2010 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70997-8 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70997-8 2010

  42. [42]

    Bernard and T

    Y. Bernard and T. Rivi\`. Energy quantization for. Ann. of Math. (2) , FJOURNAL =. 2014 , NUMBER =. doi:10.4007/annals.2014.180.1.2 , URL =

    work page doi:10.4007/annals.2014.180.1.2 2014

  43. [43]

    A.L. Besse. Einstein Manifolds. 2008

    work page 2008

  44. [44]

    Bettiol , TITLE =

    R.G. Bettiol , TITLE =. Asian J. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2017 , NUMBER =. doi:10.4310/AJM.2017.v21.n2.a7 , URL =

    work page doi:10.4310/ajm.2017.v21.n2.a7 2017

  45. [45]

    Bettiol and R.A.E

    R.G. Bettiol and R.A.E. Mendes , FAUTHOR =. Flag manifolds with strongly positive curvature , JOURNAL =. 2015 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00209-015-1464-1 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/s00209-015-1464-1 2015

  46. [46]

    Bishop and S.I

    R.L. Bishop and S.I. Goldberg. Some implications of the generalized Gauss-Bonnet theorem. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 1964

    work page 1964

  47. [47]

    C. B\". Immortal homogeneous. Invent. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2018 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00222-017-0771-z , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/s00222-017-0771-z 2018

  48. [48]

    B\"ohm and B

    C. B\"ohm and B. Wilking , FAUTHOR =. Manifolds with positive curvature operators are space forms , JOURNAL =. 2008 , NUMBER =. doi:10.4007/annals.2008.167.1079 , URL =

    work page doi:10.4007/annals.2008.167.1079 2008

  49. [49]

    Bollob\'

    B. Bollob\'. Girth of sparse graphs , JOURNAL =. 2002 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1002/jgt.10023 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1002/jgt.10023 2002

  50. [50]

    A. Borel. Sur la cohomologie des espaces fibres principaux et des espaces homogenes de groupes de Lie compacts. Ann. of Math. 1953

    work page 1953

  51. [51]

    Bredon , FAUTHOR =

    G.E. Bredon , FAUTHOR =. The cohomology ring structure of a fixed point set , JOURNAL =. 1964 , PAGES =. doi:10.2307/1970661 , URL =

    work page doi:10.2307/1970661 1964

  52. [52]

    G.E. Bredon. Introduction to compact transformation groups. 1972

    work page 1972

  53. [53]

    Brendle and R

    S. Brendle and R. Schoen , FAUTHOR =. Manifolds with. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 2009 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1090/S0894-0347-08-00613-9 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1090/s0894-0347-08-00613-9 2009

  54. [54]

    Borel , FAUTHOR =

    A. Borel , FAUTHOR =. Some remarks about. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 1949 , PAGES =

    work page 1949

  55. [55]

    A. Borel. Seminar on transformation groups. Ann. of Math. Stud. 1960

    work page 1960

  56. [56]

    Browder , TITLE =

    W. Browder , TITLE =. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , VOLUME =. 1963 , PAGES =

    work page 1963

  57. [57]

    Browder and W

    W. Browder and W. Hsiang. Some problems on homotopy theory, manifolds, and transformation groups. Proc. Sympos. Pure Math.: Algebraic and Geometric Topology, Part 2. 1978

    work page 1978

  58. [58]

    Brown and F.P

    E.H. Brown and F.P. Peterson. Whitehead products and cohomology operations. Quart. J. Math. Oxford. 1964

    work page 1964

  59. [59]

    Metrics with exceptional holonomy,

    R.L. Bryant , FAUTHOR =. Metrics with exceptional holonomy , JOURNAL =. 1987 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2307/1971360 , URL =

    work page doi:10.2307/1971360 1987

  60. [60]

    Bryant , FAUTHOR =

    R.L. Bryant , FAUTHOR =. Some remarks on. Proceedings of. 2006 , MRCLASS =

    work page 2006

  61. [61]

    Bryant and L

    R.L. Bryant and L. Hsu , FAUTHOR =. Rigidity of integral curves of rank. Invent. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1993 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/BF01232676 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01232676 1993

  62. [62]

    On the construction of some complete metrics with exceptional holonomy,

    R.L. Bryant and S.M. Salamon , FAUTHOR =. On the construction of some complete metrics with exceptional holonomy , JOURNAL =. 1989 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1215/S0012-7094-89-05839-0 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1215/s0012-7094-89-05839-0 1989

  63. [63]

    Burago and S

    D. Burago and S. Ivanov , FAUTHOR =. Riemannian tori without conjugate points are flat , JOURNAL =. 1994 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/BF01896241 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01896241 1994

  64. [64]

    Burnside

    W. Burnside. Messenger Math. 1905

    work page 1905

  65. [65]

    Cahen and S

    M. Cahen and S. Gutt , FAUTHOR =. Spin structures on compact simply connected. Simon Stevin , FJOURNAL =. 1988 , NUMBER =

    work page 1988

  66. [66]

    Chang and T

    T. Chang and T. Skjelbred , FAUTHOR =. The topological. Ann. of Math. (2) , FJOURNAL =. 1974 , PAGES =. doi:10.2307/1971074 , URL =

    work page doi:10.2307/1971074 1974

  67. [67]

    Chang and T

    T. Chang and T. Skjelbred , FAUTHOR =. Lie group actions on a. Amer. J. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1976 , NUMBER =

    work page 1976

  68. [68]

    Cheeger , FAUTHOR =

    J. Cheeger , FAUTHOR =. Some examples of manifolds of nonnegative curvature , JOURNAL =. 1973 , PAGES =

    work page 1973

  69. [69]

    Cheeger and D

    J. Cheeger and D. Gromoll , TITLE =. Ann. of Math. (2) , VOLUME =. 1972 , PAGES =

    work page 1972

  70. [70]

    Chen , FAUTHOR =

    H. Chen , FAUTHOR =. Pointwise. Ann. Global Anal. Geom. , FJOURNAL =. 1991 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/BF00776854 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00776854 1991

  71. [71]

    Chen , school =

    X. Chen , school =. 2014 , type =

    work page 2014

  72. [72]

    Chen and P

    X. Chen and P. Lu and G. Tian , TITLE =. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , VOLUME =. 2006 , NUMBER =

    work page 2006

  73. [73]

    S.-S. Chern. On the curvature and characteristic classes of a Riemannian manifold. Abh. Math. Semin. Univ. Hambg. 1956

    work page 1956

  74. [74]

    Cho and Y

    J.J. Cho and Y. Chen and Y. Ding , FAUTHOR =. On the (co)girth of a connected matroid , JOURNAL =. 2007 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1016/j.dam.2007.06.015 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dam.2007.06.015 2007

  75. [75]

    L. Conlon. On the topology of EIII and EIV. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 1965

    work page 1965

  76. [76]

    P.E. Conner. On the action of the circle group. Michigan Math. J. 1957

    work page 1957

  77. [77]

    Cooper and D.D

    D. Cooper and D.D. Long , journal=. Free actions of finite groups on rational homology 3-spheres

    work page

  78. [78]

    Cornea and G

    O. Cornea and G. Lupton and J. Oprea and D. Tanr \'e. Lusternik-Schnirelmann category. 2003

    work page 2003

  79. [79]

    Corwin and F

    I. Corwin and F. Morgan , TITLE =. Involve , VOLUME =. 2011 , NUMBER =

    work page 2011

  80. [80]

    Crenshaw, Cameron and Oxley, James , TITLE =. Adv. in Appl. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2023 , PAGES =. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2023.102515 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aam.2023.102515 2023

Showing first 80 references.