Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 68 references

Multi-messenger dynamic imaging of laser-driven shocks in water using a plasma wakefield accelerator

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that one laser wakefield accelerator can image a laser-driven shock in water with synchronized X-ray and electron probes, revealing electromagnetic fields and ion-species separation that photon-only diagnostics miss.

desk verdict A genuinely new dual-probe LWFA platform with solid shock hydrodynamics, but the ion-species claim is overreach and needs a forward model or independent measurement. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.03179 v1 pith:SHQUUQEK submitted 2025-07-03 physics.plasm-ph hep-ex

Mario D. Balcazar , Hai-En Tsai , Tobias Ostermayr , Paul T. Campbell , Qiang Chen , Cary Colgan , Gillis M. Dyer , Zachary Eisentraut
show 22 more authors
Eric Esarey Cameron G. R. Geddes Benjamin Greenwood Anthony Gonsalves Sahel Hakimi Robert Jacob Brendan Kettle Paul King Karl Krushelnick Nuno Lemos Eva Los Yong Ma Stuart P. D. Mangles John Nees Isabella M. Pagano Carl Schroeder Raspberry Simpson Alexander G. R. Thomas Matthew Trantham Jeroen van Tilborg Anthony Vazquez Carolyn C. Kuranz
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-phhep-ex
keywords LaserWakefieldAccelerationInertialConfinementFusionLaser-PlasmaPhysicsHighEnergyDensityBetatronX-rayImagingElectronRadiographyLaser-DrivenShocksMulti-messengerDiagnostics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a single laser wakefield accelerator can provide two synchronized, complementary probes—ultrafast betatron X-rays and a relativistic electron beam—to image a laser-driven shock in a free-flowing water jet at 1 Hz. The X-rays track the hydrodynamic shock, showing that a low-density vapor layer makes the compression cylindrically symmetric, similar to foam-lined fusion targets. The electron beam, sensitive to electric and magnetic fields, reveals expanding charge-separated plasma with two distinct ion populations (oxygen and hydrogen) that neither the photons nor the fluid simulations show. If correct, this dual-probe method opens high-repetition-rate, multi-messenger diagnostics for dense-plasma dynamics relevant to inertial confinement fusion.

What carries the argument

The central object is the dual-probe laser wakefield accelerator platform: one roughly 33 TW, 40 fs pulse drives a gas jet to produce synchronized betatron X-rays and a roughly 146 MeV electron beam, while a split 200 ps pulse heats a 30 $\mu$m water jet at delays up to 8 ns. The X-ray arm is a propagation-based phase-contrast imager; the electron arm is a field-sensitive radiograph whose intensity modulations are inverted with a Poisson-equation field-recovery method to estimate path-integrated $\int E\,dl$ and $\int B\,dl$. The comparison machinery is synthetic phase-contrast imaging: 3D radiation-hydrodynamic runs are post-processed with a Fresnel-Kirchhoff propagator to produce simulated X-ray images that are matched against experiment.

What would settle it

A charge-state- or species-resolved measurement of the expanding plume (for example, optical emission spectroscopy or ion spectroscopy) that shows only one ion species, or a kinetic simulation that reproduces the two-ring radiograph without separate H and O plasmas, would settle whether the ion-differentiation claim is right.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

A laser wakefield accelerator can simultaneously deliver a sub-micron X-ray source and a relativistic electron beam with femtosecond-scale timing, and using both on the same laser-heated water column exposes physics that each probe alone misses. The betatron X-ray images match synthetic phase-contrast images from radiation-hydrodynamics simulations only when a low-density vapor layer surrounds the water column; that vapor allows electron heat transport around the target, yielding a cylindrically symmetric shock-compression morphology analogous to foam-layer-assisted hohlraum targets. The electron beam radiographs show an early ionization channel, then a dark plasma cloud with a caustic ring, from which the authors recover path-integrated fields on the order of $\int E\,dl \sim 10^{4}\,\mathrm{V}$ or $\int B\,dl \sim 10^{-4}\,\mathrm{T}\cdot\mathrm{m}$; tracking the annular features yields expansion velocities $u_O = 191 \pm 7$ $\mu$m/ns and $u_H = 731 \pm 74$ $\mu$m/ns, which they assign to oxygen and hydrogen ion plasmas. These ion-species and field features are absent from single-fluid fluid simulations, and the paper argues this demonstrates the need for hybrid kinetic-radiation-hydrodynamic models.

Load-bearing premise

The interpretation assumes that the two expanding dark rings seen in the electron radiographs are distinct oxygen and hydrogen ion plasmas, identified from expansion speed and field topology alone, without any independent measurement of ion species or charge state.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Betatron X-ray imaging at 1 Hz can track shock propagation in a replenishable liquid target with sub-micron resolution and nanosecond delays, enabling time-series hydrodynamic measurements that single-shot backlighter systems cannot provide.
  • The vapor layer naturally formed around a water jet in vacuum changes the compression morphology from one-sided ablation to cylindrically symmetric compression, meaning target initial conditions such as evaporation must be included in simulations to match experiments.
  • Electron radiography with a wakefield-accelerated beam can recover lower bounds on path-integrated electromagnetic fields and identify distinct expanding ion populations, giving access to kinetic-scale physics invisible to X-rays.
  • Because the two probes are intrinsically synchronized from the same accelerator, the platform can correlate density structure and field topology on the same shot, a combination no single-probe source provides.
  • The observed discrepancies with single-fluid simulations point to the need for hybrid models that include hot electrons, nonlocal transport, and kinetic field generation in radiation-hydrodynamics codes for fusion-relevant plasmas.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the two-ring assignment holds, the same electron-radiography technique could be used to measure species-resolved expansion velocities in other multi-component laser-ablated targets, effectively turning a wakefield electron beam into a field-and-species-resolved diagnostic for warm dense matter.
  • The vapor-assisted cylindrical compression suggests a scaleable laboratory analogue for foam-lined hohlraum physics: a single laser ablator plus a low-density gas layer can produce symmetric compression, which could be tested in other liquid or gas targets with different vapor pressures.
  • The authors' field-recovery method assumes small deflections, yet the observed caustics violate that assumption; a quantitative inversion that handles caustics or uses energy-resolved electron bins could extract full field maps rather than lower bounds, making the electron probe a more precise magnetometer.
  • At 1 Hz, the platform could be extended to pump-probe delay scans across many shots, mapping the full shock-and-field evolution as a movie; that is a testable extension of the present 5-10 shot per delay protocol.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports a dual-probe platform in which a laser wakefield accelerator provides synchronized betatron X-ray and relativistic electron-beam probes to image a laser-driven shock in a 30 μm water jet in vacuum. The X-ray time series and FLASH simulations are used to infer a cylindrically symmetric shock compression morphology that the authors attribute to a low-density vapor layer around the water column; the electron radiographs are interpreted as time-evolving electromagnetic fields around the expanding plasma, with two annular features assigned to oxygen and hydrogen ion expansion. The paper's central novelty is the synchronized, high-repetition-rate multi-messenger capability and the claimed observation of charge separation and ion-species differentiation.

Significance. If secured, the dual-probe platform would be a significant diagnostic advance for high-energy-density physics: it provides simultaneous, synchronized hydrodynamic (X-ray) and field-sensitive (electron) measurements at 1 Hz on a replenishable liquid target, and the shock-velocity comparison with FLASH in Fig. 3 is a straightforward and credible validation. The data and code are deposited, supporting reproducibility. However, the most novel physical claim—ion-species differentiation from electron radiographs—rests on an interpretation that is not yet independently supported, and one key simulation parameter is stated inconsistently. The platform demonstration is strong; the physical-inference claims require additional evidence.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4.8.4 and Figs. 5–6] The claim of H/O ion-species differentiation is not secured. The two annular features are interpreted as separate O and H plasma populations based on expansion speeds whose ratio matches sqrt(m_O/m_H) at equal energy, but this check is necessary, not sufficient; any two populations with that speed ratio pass it. The recovery method itself is stated in Sec. 4.8.4 to be non-unique in the caustic regime, and the bright rings in the radiographs indicate caustics, so two rings do not by themselves establish two species. The 'absence of a plausible physical mechanism' argument (Fig. 12) is negative evidence only. Because this claim appears verbatim in the abstract as a central result, it requires either a species-sensitive independent measurement (e.g., spectroscopy or charge-state diagnosis), a forward-modeled electron radiograph from a kinetic/hybrid simulation containing distinct H and O species, or an explicit downgrade of the claim to a hypothesis.
  2. [Sec. 4.7 and Sec. 3] The vapor-layer density is inconsistent. Sec. 4.7 defines the evaporative profile with rho0 = 10^-3 g/cm^3, while Sec. 3 quotes rho0 = 0.01 g/cm^3 (10^-2 g/cm^3). This parameter controls the cylindrical-compression morphology that is a key experimental result, and the vapor layer was introduced after the experimental morphology was observed, making the agreement partly post-hoc. Please correct the discrepancy and show that the simulated compression morphology is robust over a plausible range of rho0, rather than tuned at a single value.
  3. [Sec. 4.8.4, Eqs. (21)–(29)] The field recovery assumes a rotation-less, single-valued mapping (nabla x alpha = 0) and small deflection angles, but the observed bright/dark ring structures are in the caustic regime, where the mapping is non-unique as the text acknowledges. The paper asserts that 'key features... may still be robustly extracted' but provides no validation on synthetic fields. Please benchmark the recovery on a known field model (for example, a single-species sheath field) and demonstrate that the two-ring topology cannot arise purely from caustics of a single expanding plasma; if it can, the H/O interpretation must be revised.
  4. [Sec. 4.4 and Fig. 7] The beam energy used for field recovery (E0 = 44 MeV) is not characterized. The only reported beam spectrum is 146 ± 7 MeV; if the detuned condition differs, the recovered integrated fields (Eqs. 23–24) scale with the assumed energy, so the quoted field magnitudes and inferred temperatures carry an unquantified systematic error. Please provide the spectrum and divergence at the field-recovery condition or quantify the sensitivity.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] The manuscript contains several typographical errors and awkward phrasings, including 'inaccesible' in the Discussion, 'discrepencies', 'absense', 'to to support' in Sec. 2, and 'ther combination' in the Introduction; a careful proofreading pass is needed.
  2. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption states that dashed circles identify 'an Oxygen plasma' and 'a Hydrogen plasma'; this is the interpretation being advanced, not an established result, and should be worded as a proposed identification.
  3. [Sec. 4.7] The evaporative density profile is written as rho_c = rho0 (r0/sqrt(r^2)), which is dimensionally unclear; it should be stated explicitly as rho_c = rho0 (r0/r) for r > r0 or an equivalent unambiguous form.
  4. [Sec. 4.8.1] The Fourier-mask parameters (a = 0.5, b = 2.0, N = 16) are selected heuristically; a brief statement of how the results depend on these parameters would help assess the robustness of the processed images.
  5. [Sec. 4.8.2, Eq. (13)] In Eq. (13), the sentence 'where Aj are the atomic number and the atomic weight of the j-th element of molecule' should be split into separate variables for atomic number and atomic weight; as written it is confusing.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Minor post-hoc simulation adjustment in the vapor-layer morphology; central multi-messenger and electron-beam claims remain independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 2 (Fig. 4 discussion) and Section 4.7 (FLASH simulations)]
    "Instead, a much better agreement with the structure produced experimentally was achieved in Fig. 4a panel (2), by incorporating a low-density layer surrounding the target, approximating the vapor expected from water evaporation in vacuum ... producing a cylindrical shock and symmetric compression morphology closely matching the experimental observations."

    The vapor density profile is an input chosen after the no-vapor FLASH simulation failed to match the observed rear-driven structure. The simulation output (cylindrically symmetric compression) is therefore generated by the very morphology it is used to explain: the vapor layer is the cause of the symmetric compression in the simulation, and it was inserted because that symmetry was already seen in the experiment. This makes the simulation-experiment agreement for the morphology a post-hoc reproduction rather than an independent prediction. The circularity is limited: the text invokes the electron-beam probe as separate observational support, and the shock velocity comparison is an independent observable that is not fitted.

full rationale

The paper's claimed derivation chain is mostly self-contained. The shock-velocity result is obtained by comparing tracked positions in betatron X-ray images with FLASH synthetic images, with no free parameter adjusted to force agreement; the post-shock pressure and temperature estimates follow from standard Rankine-Hugoniot relations. The electron radiography field recovery uses the external Kugland et al. method, and the paper itself notes the caustic/non-unique regime, so the field magnitudes are presented as lower bounds rather than overclaimed. The H/O species identification is an interpretation based on expansion speeds and known proton acceleration physics, not a result that is equivalent by definition to its inputs; its weakness is a lack of independent species-sensitive confirmation, which is a correctness or verification risk, not circularity. No load-bearing self-citation chain or imported uniqueness assertion is present. The only circular-adjacent element is the vapor layer added after observing the experimental morphology; since the central multi-messenger and field-evolution claims do not reduce to this fit, the overall circularity is minor.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The main free parameter is the vapor layer density in FLASH, which is tuned to match the X-ray morphology and is inconsistently reported. The field recovery relies on standard but approximate assumptions. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Vapor layer density rho0 in FLASH = 10^-3 g/cm^3 (Sec 4.7) or 0.01 g/cm^3 (Discussion)
    Added to the simulation to reproduce the observed cylindrically symmetric shock compression; no measurement or uncertainty given.
  • Flux limiter coefficient f = 0.17
    Chosen in FLASH for flux-limited diffusion based on laser parameters and Ref [65]; affects heat transport and shock morphology.
  • Effective beam energy E0 for field recovery = 44 MeV
    Chosen as representative operating condition for field recovery; lower energy increases field sensitivity but introduces chromatic effects.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Kugland field recovery assumptions: small deflection angles, rotation-less deflection, linear mapping between object and image planes
    Used in Sec 4.8.4 to recover field integrals from electron radiographs; the paper notes caustics and chromatic effects limit this.
  • domain assumption FLASH radiation hydrodynamic simulations omit electric and magnetic fields and hot electron populations
    Stated in Sec 4.7; used to interpret features not seen in simulation as kinetic phenomena.
  • domain assumption Polytropic index gamma = 5/3 for fully ionized weakly coupled plasma
    Used in Mach number and Rankine-Hugoniot analysis in Results; typical for such systems per Ref [48].
  • standard math Paraxial approximation and Fresnel-Kirchhoff propagation for phase-contrast images
    Used in Sec 4.8.2 to synthesize phase-contrast X-ray images from FLASH density maps.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multi-messenger dynamic imaging of laser-driven shocks in water using a plasma wakefield accelerator." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SHQUUQEK

@misc{pith2026250703179,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multi-messenger dynamic imaging of laser-driven shocks in water using a plasma wakefield accelerator},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SHQUUQEK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.03179}
}
read the original abstract

Understanding dense matter hydrodynamics is critical for predicting plasma behavior in environments relevant to laser-driven inertial confinement fusion. Traditional diagnostic sources face limitations in brightness, spatiotemporal resolution, and inability to detect relevant electromagnetic fields. In this work, we present a dual-probe, multi-messenger laser wakefield accelerator platform combining ultrafast X-rays and relativistic electron beams at 1 Hz, to interrogate a free-flowing water target in vacuum, heated by an intense 200 ps laser pulse. This scheme enables high-repetition-rate tracking of the interaction evolution using both particle types. Betatron X-rays reveal a cylindrically symmetric shock compression morphology assisted by low-density vapor, resembling foam-layer-assisted fusion targets. The synchronized electron beam detects time-evolving electromagnetic fields, uncovering charge separation and ion species differentiation during plasma expansion - phenomena not captured by photons or hydrodynamic simulations. We show that combining both probes provides complementary insights spanning kinetic to hydrodynamic regimes, highlighting the need for hybrid physics models to accurately predict fusion-relevant plasma behavior

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nature 601(7894), 542–548 (2022) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41586-021-04281-w

    Zylstra, A.B., Hurricane, O.A., Callahan, D.A., Kritcher, A.L., Ralph, J.E., Robey, H.F., Ross, J.S., Young, C.V., Baker, K.L., Casey, D.T., D¨ oppner, T., Divol, L., Hohen- berger, M., Le Pape, S., Pak, A., Patel, P.K., Tommasini, R., Ali, S.J., Amendt, P.A., Atherton, L.J., Bachmann, B., Bai- ley, D., Benedetti, L.R., Berzak Hopkins, L., Betti, R., Bhan...

    2022

  2. [2]

    Nature Physics 18(3), 251–258 (2022) https://doi.org/10

    Kritcher, A.L., Young, C.V., Robey, H.F., Weber, C.R., Zylstra, A.B., Hurricane, O.A., Callahan, D.A., Ralph, J.E., Ross, J.S., Baker, K.L., Casey, D.T., Clark, D.S., D¨ oppner, T., Divol, L., Hohenberger, M., Hopkins, L.B., Le Pape, S., Meezan, N.B., Pak, A., Patel, P.K., Tommasini, R., Ali, S.J., Amendt, P.A., Atherton, L.J., Bachmann, B., Bailey, D., B...

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Rubery, M.S., Rosen, M.D., Aybar, N., Lan- den, O.L., Divol, L., Young, C.V., Weber, C., Hammer, J., Moody, J.D., Moore, A.S., Kritcher, A.L., Zylstra, A.B., Hurricane, O., Pak, A.E., MacLaren, S., Zimmerman, G., Harte, J., Woods, T.: Hohlraum reheating from burning nif implosions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 065104 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.1...

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Hurricane, O.A., Callahan, D.A., Casey, D.T., Christopherson, A.R., Kritcher, A.L., Landen, O.L., Maclaren, S.A., Nora, R., Patel, P.K., Ralph, J., Schlossberg, D., Springer, P.T., Young, C.V., Zylstra, A.B.: Energy principles of scientific breakeven in an inertial fusion experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 065103 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett...

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Abu-Shawareb, H., Acree, R., Adams, P., Adams, J., Addis, B., Aden, R., Adrian, P., Afeyan, B.B., Aggleton, M., Aghaian, L., Aguirre, A., Aikens, D., Akre, J., Albert, F., Albrecht, M., Albright, B.J., Albritton, J., Alcala, J., Alday, C., Alessi, D.A., Alexan- der, N., Alfonso, J., Alfonso, N., Alger, E., Ali, S.J., Ali, Z.A., Allen, A., Alley, W.E., Ama...

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Physics of Plasmas 21(12) (2014) https://doi.org/10

    Casner, A., Masse, L., Delorme, B., Martinez, D., Huser, G., Galmiche, D., Liberatore, S., Igumenshchev, I., Olazabal-Loume, M., Nico- lai, P.H., Breil, J., Michel, D.T., Froula, D., Seka, W., Riazuelo, G., Fujioka, S., Suna- hara, A., Grech, M., Chicanne, C., Theobald, M., Borisenko, N., Orekhov, A., Tikhonchuk, V.T., Remington, B., Goncharov, V.N., Sma-...

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Physical Review Letters 115(4), 5001 (2015) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.145001

    Wan, W.C., Malamud, G., Shimony, A., Di Stefano, C.A., Trantham, M.R., Klein, S.R., Shvarts, D., Kuranz, C.C., Drake, R.P.: Observation of single-mode, kelvin-helmholtz instability in a supersonic flow. Physical Review Letters 115(4), 5001 (2015) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.145001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.145001 2015

  8. [8]

    Nature Communications 9, 1564 (2018) https://doi

    Kuranz, C.C., Park, H.-S., Huntington, C.M., Miles, A.R., Remington, B.A., Plewa, T., Trantham, M.A., Shvarts, D., Shimony, A., Raman, K., MacLaren, S., Wan, W.C., Doss, F.W., Kline, J., Flippo, K.A., Malamud, G., Handy, T.A., Prisbey, S., Krauland, C.M., Klein, S.R., Harding, E.C., Wallace, R., Grosskopf, M., Marion, D.C., Kalantar, D., Giraldez, E., Dra...

    work page 2018

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    Review of Scien- tific Instruments 81(10) (2010) https://doi

    Workman, J., Cobble, J., Flippo, K., Gautier, D.C., Montgomery, D.S., Offermann, D.T.: Phase-contrast imaging using ultrafast x-rays in laser-shocked materials. Review of Scien- tific Instruments 81(10) (2010) https://doi. org/10.1063/1.3485109

    2010 doi

  2. [10]

    Physics of Plas- mas 13(5) (2006) https://doi.org/10.1063/1

    Park, H.-S., Chambers, D.M., Chung, H.- K., Clarke, R.J., Eagleton, R., Giraldez, E., Goldsack, T., Heathcote, R., Izumi, N., Key, M.H., King, J.A., Koch, J.A., Landen, O.L., Nikroo, A., Patel, P.K., Price, D.F., Rem- ington, B.A., Robey, H.F., Snavely, R.A., Steinman, D.A., S...

    2006

  3. [11]

    1103/PhysRevLett.92.165005

    Fournier, K.B., Constantin, C., Gregori, 22 G., Miller, M.C., Back, C.A., Suter, L.J., Davis, J., Grun, J.: Efficient multi-kev x- ray sources from ti-doped aerogel targets 730(1), 223–232 (2004) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.92.165005

    2004

  4. [12]

    Li, C.K., S´ eguin, F.H., Frenje, J.A., Rygg, J.R., Petrasso, R.D., Town, R.P.J., Amendt, P.A., Hatchett, S.P., Landen, O.L., Mack- innon, A.J., Patel, P.K., Smalyuk, V.A., Sangster, T.C., Knauer, J.P.: Measuring e and b fields in laser-produced plasmas with monoenergetic prot...

    2006 doi

  5. [13]

    Reviews of Modern Physics 95, 045007 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.95.045007

    Schaeffer, D.B., Bott, A.F.A., Borghesi, M., Flippo, K.A., Fox, W., Fuchs, J., Li, C., S´ eguin, F.H., Park, H.-S., Tzeferacos, P., Willingale, L.: Proton imaging of high- energy-density laboratory plasmas. Reviews of Modern Physics 95, 045007 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1103/R...

    2023 doi

  6. [14]

    Nature Com- munications 11(1), 6174 (2020) https://doi

    Ostermayr, T.M., Kreuzer, C., Englbrecht, F.S., Gebhard, J., Hartmann, J., Huebl, A., Haffa, D., Hilz, P., Parodi, K., Wenz, J.,et al.: Laser-driven x-ray and proton micro-source and application to simultaneous single-shot bi-modal radiographic imaging. Nature Com- munications...

    2020 doi

  7. [15]

    Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 46(9R), 5853 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP

    Orimo, S., Nishiuchi, M., Daido, H., Yogo, A., Ogura, K., Sagisaka, A., Li, Z., Pirozhkov, A., Mori, M., Kiriyama, H., et al.: Simulta- neous proton and x-ray imaging with fem- tosecond intense laser driven plasma source. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 46(9R), 5853 (2007)...

    2007 doi

  8. [16]

    Journal of Physics: Conference Series 112(4), 042036 (2008) https://doi.org/10

    Nishiuchi, M., Daido, H., Yogo, A., Sag- isaka, A., Ogura, K., Orimo, S., Mori, M., Ma, J., Pirozhkov, A.S., Kiriyama, H., et al.: Laser-driven proton sources and their appli- cations: femtosecond intense laser plasma driven simultaneous proton and x-ray imag- ing. Journal of ...

    2008

  9. [17]

    Physical Review Letters 43(4), 267 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.43.267

    Tajima, T., Dawson, J.M.: Laser elec- tron accelerator. Physical Review Letters 43(4), 267 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.43.267

    1979

  10. [18]

    Nature 431(7008), 535–538 (2004) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nature02939

    Mangles, S.P.D., Murphy, C.D., Najmudin, Z., Thomas, A.G.R., Collier, J.L., Dan- gor, A.E., Divall, E.J., Foster, P.S., Gal- lacher, J.G., Hooker, C.J., et al.: Monoen- ergetic beams of relativistic electrons from intense laser–plasma interactions. Nature 431(7008), 535–538 (2...

    2004 doi

  11. [19]

    Nature 431(7008), 538–541 (2004) https: //doi.org/10.1038/nature02900

    Geddes, C.G.R., Toth, C., Van Tilborg, J., Esarey, E., Schroeder, C.B., Bruhwiler, D., Nieter, C., Cary, J., Leemans, W.P.: High- quality electron beams from a laser wake- field accelerator using plasma-channel guid- ing. Nature 431(7008), 538–541 (2004) https: //doi.org/10.10...

    2004 doi

  12. [20]

    Nature 431(7008), 541–544 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02963

    Faure, J., Glinec, Y., Pukhov, A., Kiselev, S., Gordienko, S., Lefebvre, E., Rousseau, J.-P., Burgy, F., Malka, V.: A laser–plasma accelerator producing monoenergetic electron beams. Nature 431(7008), 541–544 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02963

    2004 doi

  13. [21]

    Nature Physics 2(10), 696–699 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys418

    Leemans, W.P., Nagler, B., Gonsalves, A.J., T´ oth, C., Nakamura, K., Geddes, C.G.R., Esarey, E., Schroeder, C.B., Hooker, S.M.: Gev electron beams from a centimetre-scale accelerator. Nature Physics 2(10), 696–699 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys418

    2006 doi

  14. [22]

    Nature Photonics 2(9), 571–577 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2008.155

    Hafz, N.A.M., Jeong, T.M., Choi, I.W., Lee, S.K., Pae, K.H., Kulagin, V.V., Sung, J.H., Yu, T.J., Hong, K.H., Hosokai, T., et al.: Stable generation of gev-class electron beams from self-guided laser–plasma chan- nels. Nature Photonics 2(9), 571–577 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1...

    2008 doi

  15. [23]

    : Quasi-monoenergetic laser-plasma accelera- tion of electrons to 2 gev

    Wang, X., Zgadzaj, R., Fazel, N., Li, Z., Yi, S.A., Zhang, X., Henderson, W., Chang, Y.-Y., Korzekwa, R., Tsai, H.-E., et al. : Quasi-monoenergetic laser-plasma accelera- tion of electrons to 2 gev. Nature Communi- cations 4(1), 1–9 (2013) https://doi.org/10. 1038/ncomms2988 23

    2013

  16. [24]

    : Petawatt laser guiding and electron beam acceleration to 8 gev in a laser-heated capillary dis- charge waveguide

    Gonsalves, A., Nakamura, K., Daniels, J., Benedetti, C., Pieronek, C., De Raadt, T., Steinke, S., Bin, J., Bulanov, S., Van Tilborg, J., et al. : Petawatt laser guiding and electron beam acceleration to 8 gev in a laser-heated capillary dis- charge waveguide. Physical review l...

    2019

  17. [25]

    Physics of Plas- mas 14(8), 080701 (2007) https://doi.org/10

    Ta Phuoc, K., Fitour, R., Tafzi, A., Garl, T., Artemiev, N., Shah, R., Albert, F., Boschetto, D., Rousse, A., Kim, D.E., Pukhov, A., Seredov, V., Kostyukov, I.: Demonstration of the ultrafast nature of laser produced betatron radiation. Physics of Plas- mas 14(8), 080701 (2007...

    2007

  18. [26]

    Applied Physics Letters 118(13) (2021) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0046184

    Grigoriadis, A., Andrianaki, G., Tatarakis, M., Benis, E.P., Papadogiannis, N.A.: Betatron-type laser-plasma x-ray sources generated in multi-electron gas targets. Applied Physics Letters 118(13) (2021) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0046184

    2021 doi

  19. [27]

    Nature Physics 7(9), 737 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1789

    Kneip, S., McGuffey, C., Martins, J.L., Mar- tins, S.F., Bellei, C., Chvykov, V., Dollar, F., Fonseca, R., Huntington, C., Kalintchenko, G., Maksimchuk, A., Mangles, S.P.D., Mat- suoka, T., Nagel, S.R., Palmer, C.A.J., Schreiber, J., Phuoc, K.T., Thomas, A.G.R., Yanovsky, V., ...

    2011 doi

  20. [28]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 56(8), 084015 (2014) https://doi.org/10

    Albert, F., Thomas, A.G.R., Mangles, S.P.D., Banerjee, S., Corde, S., Flacco, A., Litos, M., Neely, D., Vieira, J., Najmudin, Z., Bingham, R., Joshi, C., Katsouleas, T.: Laser wakefield accelerator based light sources: potential applications and require- ments. Plasma Physics ...

    2014

  21. [29]

    Physical Review E 74(4), 045401 (2006) https://doi.org/10

    Shah, R.C., Albert, F., Phuoc, K.T., Shevchenko, O., Boschetto, D., Pukhov, A., Kiselev, S., Burgy, F., Rousseau, J.- P., Rousse, A.: Coherence-based transverse measurement of synchrotron x-ray radiation from relativistic laser-plasma interaction and laser-accelerated electron...

    2006

  22. [30]

    Review of Scien- tific Instruments 66(12), 5486–5492 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1146073

    Snigirev, A., Snigireva, I., Kohn, V., Kuznetsov, S., Schelokov, I.: On the possibilities of x-ray phase contrast microimaging by coherent high-energy synchrotron radiation. Review of Scien- tific Instruments 66(12), 5486–5492 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1146073

    1995 doi

  23. [31]

    Nature 384(6607), 335–338 (1996) https:// doi.org/10.1038/384335a0

    Wilkins, S.W., Gureyev, T.E., Gao, D., Pogany, A., Stevenson, A.W.: Phase-contrast imaging using polychromatic hard x-rays. Nature 384(6607), 335–338 (1996) https:// doi.org/10.1038/384335a0

    1996 doi

  24. [32]

    Optics Letters 36(13), 2426–2428 (2011) https:// doi.org/10.1364/OL.36.002426

    Fourmaux, S., Corde, S., Phuoc, K.T., Las- sonde, P., Lebrun, G., Payeur, S., Martin, F., Sebban, S., Malka, V., Rousse, A., Kieffer, J.C.: Single shot phase contrast imaging using laser-produced betatron x-ray beams. Optics Letters 36(13), 2426–2428 (2011) https:// doi.org/10...

    2011 doi

  25. [33]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 61(5) (2019) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1361-6587/ab0e4f

    Vargas, M., Schumaker, W., He, Z.-H., Behm, K., Chvykov, V., Hou, B., Krushel- nick, K., Maksimchuk, A., Nees, J.A., Yanovsky, V., Zhao, Z., Thomas, A.G.R.: X- ray phase contrast imaging of additive man- ufactured structures using a laser wakefield accelerator. Plasma Physics ...

    2019

  26. [34]

    Sci- entific Reports 8 (2018) https://doi.org/10

    Wood, J.C., Chapman, D.J., Poder, K., Lopes, N.C., Rutherford, M.E., Whites, T.G., Albert, F., Behm, K.T., Booth, N., Bryant, J.S.J., Foster, P.S., Glanzer, S., Hill, E., Krushelnick, K., Najmudin, Z., Pollock, B.B., Rose, S., Schumaker, W., Scott, R.H.H., Sher- lock, M., Thom...

    2018

  27. [35]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences 115(25), 6335–6340 (2018) https://doi

    Cole, J.M., Symes, D.R., Lopes, N.C., Wood, J.C., Poder, K., Alatabi, S., Botchway, S.W., Foster, P.S., Gratton, S., Johnson, S., Bing- ham, R., Joshi, C., Katsouleas, T.: High- resolution µct of a mouse embryo using a compact laser-driven x-ray betatron source. Proceedings of...

    2018 doi

  28. [36]

    Scientific Reports 9(1), 3249 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41598-019-39845-4

    Hussein, A.E., Senabulya, N., Ma, Y., Streeter, M.J.V., Kettle, B., Dann, S.J.D., Albert, F., Bourgeois, N., Cipiccia, S., Cole, J.M., Finlay, O., Gerstmayr, E., Gonz´ alez, I.G., Higginbotham, A., Jaroszynski, D.A., Falk, K., Krushelnick, K., Lemos, N., Lopes, N.C., Lumsdon, ...

    2019

  29. [37]

    Nature Communications 9(1), 3276 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-018-05791-4

    Mahieu, B., Jourdain, N., Ta Phuoc, K., Dorchies, F., Goddet, J.-P., Lifschitz, A., Renaudin, P., Lecherbourg, L.: Probing warm dense matter using femtosecond x-ray absorp- tion spectroscopy with a laser-produced betatron source. Nature Communications 9(1), 3276 (2018) https:/...

    2018

  30. [38]

    Communications Physics 7(1), 247 (2024) https://doi.org/10

    Kettle, B., Colgan, C., Los, E.E., Gerstmayr, E., Streeter, M.J.V., Albert, F., Astbury, S., Baggott, R.A., Cavanagh, N., Falk, K., et al.: Extended x-ray absorption spectroscopy using an ultrashort pulse laboratory-scale laser-plasma accelerator. Communications Physics 7(1), ...

    2024

  31. [39]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 58(10) (2016) https://doi.org/10

    Albert, F., Thomas, A.G.R.: Applications of laser wakefield accelerator-based light sources. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 58(10) (2016) https://doi.org/10. 1088/0741-3335/58/10/103001

    2016

  32. [40]

    Physical Review Let- ters 110(1), 015003 (2013) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.015003

    Schumaker, W., Nakanii, N., McGuffey, C., Zulick, C., Chyvkov, V., Dollar, F., Habara, H., Kalintchenko, G., Maksimchuk, A., Tanaka, K.A.: Ultrafast electron radio- graphy of magnetic fields in high-intensity laser-solid interactions. Physical Review Let- ters 110(1), 015003 (...

    2013 doi

  33. [41]

    Nature Physics 18(10), 1186–1190 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-022-01717-6

    Wan, Y., Seemann, O., Tata, S., Andriyash, I.A., Smartsev, S., Kroupp, E., Malka, V.: Direct observation of relativistic bro- ken plasma waves. Nature Physics 18(10), 1186–1190 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-022-01717-6

    2022

  34. [42]

    Scientific Reports 6(1), 29485 (2016) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/srep29485

    Zhang, C.J., Hua, J.F., Xu, X.L., Li, F., Pai, C.-H., Wan, Y., Wu, Y.P., Gu, Y.Q., Mori, W.B., Joshi, C.: Capturing relativistic wake- field structures in plasmas using ultrashort high-energy electrons as a probe. Scientific Reports 6(1), 29485 (2016) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/...

    2016 doi

  35. [43]

    Physical Review Letters 119(6), 064801 (2017) https://doi

    Zhang, C.J., Hua, J.F., Wan, Y., Pai, C.H., Guo, B., Zhang, J., Ma, Y., Li, F., Wu, Y.P., Chu, H.H., Gu, Y.Q., Xu, X.L., Mori, W.B., Joshi, C., Wang, J., Lu, W.: Femtosecond probing of plasma wakefields and observa- tion of the plasma wake reversal using a relativistic electro...

    2017 doi

  36. [44]

    Nature Reviews Physics 1(10), 585–599 (2019) https: //doi.org/10.1038/s42254-019-0101-z

    M´ esz´ aros, P., Fox, D.B., Hanna, C., Murase, K.: Multi-messenger astrophysics. Nature Reviews Physics 1(10), 585–599 (2019) https: //doi.org/10.1038/s42254-019-0101-z

    2019 doi

  37. [45]

    Kruer, W.L.: The physics of laser plasma interactions (2019) https://doi.org/10.1201/ 9781003003243

    2019

  38. [46]

    shine-through

    Bradley, D.K., Boehly, T., Brown, D.L., Delettrez, J., Seka, W., Smith, D.: Early-time “shine-through” in laser irradiated targets. Laser Interaction and Related Plasma Phe- nomena 9, 323–334 (1991) https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-1-4615-3804-2 23 25

    1991 doi

  39. [47]

    The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 131(1), 273 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1086/ 317361

    Fryxell, B., Olson, K., Ricker, P., Timmes, F.X., Zingale, M., Lamb, D.Q., MacNeice, P., Rosner, R., Truran, J.W., Tufo, H.: Flash: An adaptive mesh hydrodynamics code for mod- eling astrophysical thermonuclear flashes. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 131(1), 273 (...

    2000

  40. [48]

    Drake, R.P.: High-energy-density physics: Foundation of inertial fusion and experimen- tal astrophysics, 658 (2018) https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-319-67711-8

    2018 doi

  41. [49]

    Nature Commu- nications 15(1), 7896 (2024) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41467-024-52232-6

    Laso Garcia, A., Yang, L., Bouffetier, V., Appel, K., Baehtz, C., Hagemann, J., H¨ oppner, H., Humphries, O., Kluge, T., Mishchenko, M., et al.: Cylindrical compres- sion of thin wires by irradiation with a joule-class short-pulse laser. Nature Commu- nications 15(1), 7896 (20...

    2024 doi

  42. [50]

    Canadian Journal of Physics 64(8), 932–943 (1986) https://doi

    Delettrez, J.: Thermal electron transport in direct-drive laser fusion. Canadian Journal of Physics 64(8), 932–943 (1986) https://doi. org/10.1139/p86-162

    1986 doi

  43. [51]

    Physics of Plasmas 8(2), 542–549 (2001) https://doi

    Wilks, S.C., Langdon, A.B., Cowan, T.E., Roth, M., Singh, M., Hatchett, S., Key, M.H., Pennington, D., MacKinnon, A., Snavely, R.A.: Energetic proton generation in ultra- intense laser–solid interactions. Physics of Plasmas 8(2), 542–549 (2001) https://doi. org/10.1063/1.1333697

    2001 doi

  44. [53]

    Fusion Science and Technol- ogy 73(2), 194–209 (2018) https://doi.org/ 10.1080/15361055.2017.1406248

    Bhandarkar, S., Baumann, T., Alfonso, N., Thomas, C., Baker, K., Moore, A., Larson, C., Bennett, D., Sain, J., Nikroo, A.: Fabrica- tion of low-density foam liners in hohlraums for nif targets. Fusion Science and Technol- ogy 73(2), 194–209 (2018) https://doi.org/ 10.1080/1536...

    2018

  45. [54]

    : Quantitative phase contrast imaging of a shock-wave with a laser- plasma based x-ray source

    Barbato, F., Atzeni, S., Batani, D., Bleiner, D., Boutoux, G., Brabetz, C., Bradford, P., Mancelli, D., Neumayer, P., Schiavi, A., et al. : Quantitative phase contrast imaging of a shock-wave with a laser- plasma based x-ray source. Scientific Reports 9(1), 1–11 (2019) https:/...

    2019

  46. [55]

    Review of Scientific Instruments 90(3) (2019) https://doi.org/10

    King, P.M., Lemos, N., Shaw, J.L., Milder, A.L., Marsh, K.A., Pak, A., Hegelich, B.M., Michel, P., Moody, J., Joshi, C., Albert, F.: X-ray analysis methods for sources from self- modulated laser wakefield acceleration driven by picosecond lasers. Review of Scientific Instrumen...

    2019

  47. [56]

    Physical Review E 65(5), 056505 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE

    Esarey, E., Shadwick, B.A., Catravas, P., Leemans, W.P.: Synchrotron radiation from electron beams in plasma-focusing chan- nels. Physical Review E 65(5), 056505 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE. 65.056505

    2002 doi

  48. [57]

    Physics of Plasmas 25(4) (2018) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5023694

    Tsai, H.-E., Swanson, K.K., Barber, S.K., Lehe, R., Mao, H.-S., Mittelberger, D.E., Steinke, S., Nakamura, K., Tilborg, J., Schroeder, C., et al.: Control of quasi- monoenergetic electron beams from laser- plasma accelerators with adjustable shock density profile. Physics of P...

    2018 doi

  49. [58]

    Physi- cal Review Special Topics—Accelerators and Beams 14(6), 062801 (2011) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.14.062801

    Nakamura, K., Gonsalves, A., Lin, C., Smith, A., Rodgers, D., Donahue, R., Byrne, W., Leemans, W.: Electron beam charge diag- nostics for laser plasma accelerators. Physi- cal Review Special Topics—Accelerators and Beams 14(6), 062801 (2011) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevSTA...

    2011 doi

  50. [59]

    Physical Review Letters 26 104(2), 025004 (2010) https://doi.org/10

    McGuffey, C., Thomas, A.G.R., Schumaker, W., Matsuoka, T., Chvykov, V., Dollar, F.J., Kalintchenko, G., Yanovsky, V., Mak- simchuk, A., Krushelnick, K., et al.: Ion- ization induced trapping in a laser wake- field accelerator. Physical Review Letters 26 104(2), 025004 (2010) h...

    2010

  51. [61]

    Review of Scientific Instruments 81(3) (2010) https://doi.org/10

    Plateau, G., Matlis, N., Geddes, C., Gon- salves, A., Shiraishi, S., Lin, C., Van Mourik, R., Leemans, W.: Wavefront-sensor-based electron density measurements for laser- plasma accelerators. Review of Scientific Instruments 81(3) (2010) https://doi.org/10. 1063/1.3360889

    2010

  52. [62]

    Review of scientific instruments 75(5), 1209–1218 (2004) https://doi.org/10

    Charvat, A., Lugovoj, E., Faubel, M., Abel, B.: New design for a time-of-flight mass spectrometer with a liquid beam laser des- orption ion source for the analysis of biomolecules. Review of scientific instruments 75(5), 1209–1218 (2004) https://doi.org/10. 1063/1.1710704

    2004

  53. [63]

    Nature Communications 9(1), 1–8 (2018) https:// doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03696-w

    Koralek, J.D., Kim, J.B., Brˇ za, P., Curry, C.B., Chen, Z., Bechtel, H.A., Cordones, A.A., Sperling, P., Toleikis, S., Kern, J.F., et al.: Generation and characterization of ultrathin free-flowing liquid sheets. Nature Communications 9(1), 1–8 (2018) https:// doi.org/10.1038/...

    2018 doi

  54. [64]

    Review of Scientific Instruments 87(11), 11–328 (2016) https://doi.org/10

    Kim, J.B., G¨ ode, S., Glenzer, S.H.: Devel- opment of a cryogenic hydrogen microjet for high-intensity, high-repetition rate exper- iments. Review of Scientific Instruments 87(11), 11–328 (2016) https://doi.org/10. 1063/1.4961089

    2016

  55. [65]

    Physics of Plas- mas 30(6) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1063/5

    Chen, Z.H., Yang, X.H., Zhang, G.B., Ma, Y.Y., Xu, H., Luan, S.X., Zhang, J.: Effect of non-local transport of hot electrons on the laser-target ablation. Physics of Plas- mas 30(6) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1063/5. 0146342

    2023 doi

  56. [66]

    Born, M., Wolf, E.: Principles of optics: elec- tromagnetic theory of propagation, interfer- ence and diffraction of light (2013) https: //doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139644181

    2013 doi

  57. [67]

    Physics in Medicine & Biology 43(10), 2845 (1998) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/0031-9155/43/10/013

    Arfelli, F., Assante, M., Bonvicini, V., Bravin, A., Cantatore, G., Castelli, E., Dalla Palma, L., Di Michiel, M., Longo, R., Olivo, A., et al.: Low-dose phase contrast x- ray medical imaging. Physics in Medicine & Biology 43(10), 2845 (1998) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/0031-9155...

    1998 doi

  58. [68]

    Physics in Medicine & Biology 51(12), 3015 (2006) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/0031-9155/51/12/001

    Olivo, A., Speller, R.: Experimental valida- tion of a simple model capable of predicting the phase contrast imaging capabilities of any x-ray imaging system. Physics in Medicine & Biology 51(12), 3015 (2006) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/0031-9155/51/12/001

    2006 doi

  59. [69]

    Cytometry Part A: the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytol- ogy 58(2), 167–176 (2004) https://doi.org/ 10.1002/cyto.a.20022

    Meijering, E., Jacob, M., Sarria, J.-C.F., Steiner, P.L., Hirling, H., Unser, E.M.: Design and validation of a tool for neurite trac- ing and analysis in fluorescence microscopy images. Cytometry Part A: the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytol- ogy 58(2),...

    2004 doi

  60. [70]

    Review of Scientific Instruments 83(10) (2012) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4750234 Acknowledgments The work was supported by the U.S

    Kugland, N.L., Ryutov, D.D., Plechaty, C., Ross, J.S., Park, H.-S.: Invited article: Rela- tion between electric and magnetic field structures and their proton-beam images. Review of Scientific Instruments 83(10) (2012) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4750234 Acknowledgments The wor...

    2012 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.