Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Generalised additive mixed models for dynamic analysis in linguistics: a practical introduction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1703.05339 v1 pith:SHSEFLTT submitted 2017-03-15 stat.AP

classification stat.AP
keywords gammsintroductionmodelsadditiveanalysisdynamicgeneralisedlinguistics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This is a hands-on introduction to Generalised Additive Mixed Models (GAMMs) in the context of linguistics with a particular focus on dynamic speech analysis (e.g. formant contours, pitch tracks, diachronic change, etc.). The main goal is to explain some of the main ideas underlying GAMMs, and to provide a practical guide to frequentist significance testing using these models. The introduction covers a range of topics including basis functions, the smoothing penalty, random smooths, difference smooths, smooth interactions, model comparison and autocorrelation. It is divided into two parts. The first part looks at what GAMMs are, how they work and why/when we should use them. Although the reader can replicate some of the example analyses in this section, this is not essential. The second part is a tutorial introduction that illustrates the process of fitting and evaluating GAMMs in the R statistical software environment, and the reader is strongly encouraged to work through the examples on their own machine.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Language Models Largely Exhibit Human-like Constituent Ordering Preferences

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across heavy NP shift, dative alternation and multiple PP shift, LLM ordering preferences correlate with human judgments, but particle movement preferences do not.

Pith tools