Pith sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.15172 v1 pith:SLKWVFWA submitted 2023-08-29 eess.IV cs.CVcs.LG

Is visual explanation with Grad-CAM more reliable for deeper neural networks? a case study with automatic pneumothorax diagnosis

classification eess.IV cs.CVcs.LG
keywords deepdiagnosislearningdifferentgrad-camnetworkspneumothoraxarchitectures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

While deep learning techniques have provided the state-of-the-art performance in various clinical tasks, explainability regarding their decision-making process can greatly enhance the credence of these methods for safer and quicker clinical adoption. With high flexibility, Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) has been widely adopted to offer intuitive visual interpretation of various deep learning models' reasoning processes in computer-assisted diagnosis. However, despite the popularity of the technique, there is still a lack of systematic study on Grad-CAM's performance on different deep learning architectures. In this study, we investigate its robustness and effectiveness across different popular deep learning models, with a focus on the impact of the networks' depths and architecture types, by using a case study of automatic pneumothorax diagnosis in X-ray scans. Our results show that deeper neural networks do not necessarily contribute to a strong improvement of pneumothorax diagnosis accuracy, and the effectiveness of GradCAM also varies among different network architectures.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.