Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Distances and absolute magnitudes from trigonometric parallaxes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/9812094 v1 pith:SNAU4M6Z submitted 1998-12-04 astro-ph

classification astro-ph
keywords errorshipparcossystematicabsolutedistanceseitherestimatesmagnitudes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We first review the current knowledge of Hipparcos systematic and random errors, in particular small-scale correlations. Then, assuming Gaussian parallax errors and using examples from the recent Hipparcos literature, we show how random errors may be misinterpreted as systematic errors, or transformed into systematic errors. Finally we summarise how to get unbiased estimates of absolute magnitudes and distances, using either Bayesian or non-parametrical methods. These methods may be applied to get either mean quantities or individual estimates. In particular, we underline the notion of astrometry-based luminosity, which avoids the truncation biases and allows a full use of Hipparcos samples.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 13 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Absolute Calibration of Cluster Mira Variables to Provide a New Anchor for the Hubble Constant Determination

    astro-ph.GA 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Mira variables in globular clusters are used as a new, independent distance anchor, yielding a 3.7% Hubble constant of 73.06 ± 2.67 km/s/Mpc.

Pith tools