REVIEW 1 cited by
Distances and absolute magnitudes from trigonometric parallaxes
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We first review the current knowledge of Hipparcos systematic and random errors, in particular small-scale correlations. Then, assuming Gaussian parallax errors and using examples from the recent Hipparcos literature, we show how random errors may be misinterpreted as systematic errors, or transformed into systematic errors. Finally we summarise how to get unbiased estimates of absolute magnitudes and distances, using either Bayesian or non-parametrical methods. These methods may be applied to get either mean quantities or individual estimates. In particular, we underline the notion of astrometry-based luminosity, which avoids the truncation biases and allows a full use of Hipparcos samples.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Absolute Calibration of Cluster Mira Variables to Provide a New Anchor for the Hubble Constant Determination
Mira variables in globular clusters are used as a new, independent distance anchor, yielding a 3.7% Hubble constant of 73.06 ± 2.67 km/s/Mpc.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.