REVIEW 1 cited by
The lens mass in the Einstein ring JWST-ER1
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
JWST has made several surprising discoveries, underscored by the `too early' appearance of well-formed galaxies and supermassive black holes. It recently also uncovered a compact galaxy (JWST-ER1g) associated with a complete Einstein ring (JWST-ER1r) at photometric redshift $z_l=1.94^{+0.13}_{-0.17}$, produced by a lensed galaxy at $z_s=2.98^{+0.42}_{-0.47}$. In two independent studies, this system ($M_{\rm lens}\sim 6.5\times 10^{11}\;M_\odot$) has yielded different conclusions concerning whether or not it requires an unexpected contribution of mass from sources other than stars and fiducial dark matter. The different redshift inferred by these two analysis for the lensed galaxy appears to be the culprit. In this paper, we examine the impact of the background cosmology on our interpretation of the JWST data. We compare the measured characteristics of JWST-ER1 in flat-$\Lambda$CDM with those emerging in the context of $R_{\rm h}=ct$. We show that, unlike the latter model's mitigation of the tension created by JWST's other discoveries, neither cosmology is favored by this particular Einstein ring. The disparity is common to both models, leaving open the question of whether a new type of mass, or a modified initial mass function, may be present in this source.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Comparison of $R_h=ct$ and $\Lambda$CDM using DESI DR1 measurements
Using DESI DR1 distance measurements, flat LambdaCDM is decisively preferred over R_h=ct, driven almost entirely by the Lyman-alpha data point at redshift 2.33.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.