Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Measuring Scientific Broadness

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1805.04647 v2 pith:SROR4J7S submitted 2018-05-12 physics.soc-ph cs.DL

classification physics.soc-phcs.DL
keywords broadnessscientificanalysisapplyarxivcommentfindingshere
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Who has not read letters of recommendations that comment on a student's `broadness' and wondered what to make of it? We here propose a way to quantify scientific broadness by a semantic analysis of researchers' publications. We apply our methods to papers on the open-access server arXiv.org and report our findings.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools