Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development

As of 22 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 30 of 30 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2505.04521.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2505.04521 v1

Coverage vector

measured 30 of 30 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.369521Z

measured 30 of 30 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00

measured 0 of 0 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: cited_works

Reference resolution

30 of 30 outbound references displayed

verified exact0
verified fuzzy26
unresolved4
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation 058c3f0c-0a09-4728-a1ae-9bd8ae122879 · outbound

This paper cites https://codeforces.com/.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development https://codeforces.com/

Reference 1

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.927958Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.

Observation 6d7f3ff5-f65a-4e73-b6fe-dd8fe9d98f4a · outbound

This paper cites https://www.nowtricity.com/country/ united-kingdom/.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development https://www.nowtricity.com/country/ united-kingdom/

Reference 2

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.911036Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.

Observation 9ae52dd1-2b7a-413b-858d-140f6deb7f1f · outbound

This paper cites https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/

Reference 3

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.894741Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.

Observation 80884cb4-b0af-4c15-8a03-df8641e0bb71 · outbound

This paper cites https://www.hackerrank.com/.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development https://www.hackerrank.com/

Reference 4

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.878052Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.

Observation 396da1b6-2fad-4e4b-8c91-464d6d878da1 · outbound

This paper cites https://www.delltechnologies.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development https://www.delltechnologies

Reference 5

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.862335Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.

Observation bd962d01-bd16-414c-85b6-95b2a0376276 · outbound

This paper cites https://leetcode.com/problemset/.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development https://leetcode.com/problemset/

Reference 6

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.844783Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.

Observation 6312387e-0ceb-40ab-933e-a93b8cb0768d · outbound

This paper cites https://unece.org/sites/ default/files/2022-04/LCA_3_FINAL%20March%202022.pdf.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development https://unece.org/sites/ default/files/2022-04/LCA_3_FINAL%20March%202022.pdf

Reference 7

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.828370Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.

Observation 5d3aad51-e254-4ede-aa10-04a7c0c55a95 · outbound

This paper cites https://esg.asus.com/english/file/PEP_ Notebook_C423.pdf.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development https://esg.asus.com/english/file/PEP_ Notebook_C423.pdf

Reference 8

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.811087Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.

Observation 0510c0a4-6ddf-45b4-9437-2e52d6f45614 · outbound

This paper cites https://github.com/HayatoKanee/Green-LLM, 2025.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development https://github.com/HayatoKanee/Green-LLM, 2025

Reference 9

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.793150Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.

Observation 6961cf8e-6275-45f1-82f8-a3d38cf7cef0 · outbound

This paper cites Green software process factors: A qualitative study.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development Green software process factors: A qualitative study

Reference 10

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.776667Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.

Observation a8c7eb5f-5db6-4def-b658-dd38956ddbed · outbound

This paper cites Generative ai tools in media and entertainment.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development Generative ai tools in media and entertainment

Reference 11

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.759828Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.

Observation 32fa077e-4e5d-464e-bd6e-059d96420a28 · outbound

This paper cites Requirements engineering for sustainable software systems: a systematic mapping study.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development Requirements engineering for sustainable software systems: a systematic mapping study

Reference 12

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.742892Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.

Observation 5aee3b9d-524e-4e10-a20e-e32a717a8ad0 · outbound

This paper cites Code green: Evaluating the carbon and energy implications of llm integration in software development.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development Code green: Evaluating the carbon and energy implications of llm integration in software development

Reference 13

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.726385Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.

Observation a41ee5e8-5226-4d14-8874-0d2d7edb8787 · outbound

This paper cites Large language model assisted software engineering: Prospects, challenges, and case study.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development Large language model assisted software engineering: Prospects, challenges, and case study

Reference 14

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.707788Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.

Observation 3e2623cb-9646-4837-ac8b-9101894309f1 · outbound

This paper cites LLMCarbon: Modeling the end-to-end carbon footprint of large language models.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development LLMCarbon: Modeling the end-to-end carbon footprint of large language models

Reference 15

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.688894Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.

Observation 6d510197-f854-43fd-9465-df572a2b48d8 · outbound

This paper cites Mourão, and Ivan Machado.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development Mourão, and Ivan Machado

Reference 16

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.672020Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.

Observation aca7ea38-a018-4168-8731-0f12ee27846c · outbound

This paper cites Ko, Brad A.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development Ko, Brad A

Reference 17

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.654283Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.

Observation 11478e06-b83f-4b0d-a1b4-bd3838832268 · outbound

This paper cites Sustainable software engineering: Visions and perspectives beyond energy efficiency.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development Sustainable software engineering: Visions and perspectives beyond energy efficiency

Reference 18

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.636425Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.

Observation 1e0321d3-06a4-40ee-ba56-0547521e479c · outbound

This paper cites ChatGPT’s Energy Use per Query.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development ChatGPT’s Energy Use per Query

Reference 19

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.618337Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.

Observation 163a2820-6150-46d3-bd7f-66d9d3e427ef · outbound

This paper cites Large language models: Their success and impact.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development Large language models: Their success and impact

Reference 20

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.312596Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 41426009-3d7e-417f-8f7d-40e6e01f16d8 · outbound

This paper cites Sustainability is stratified: Toward a better theory of sustainable software engineering.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development Sustainability is stratified: Toward a better theory of sustainable software engineering

Reference 21

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.585028Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.

Observation a36e5241-4d97-4ff9-9c6b-7ccb6274bf75 · outbound

This paper cites I know what you did last summer - an investigation of how developers spend their time.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development I know what you did last summer - an investigation of how developers spend their time

Reference 22

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.566647Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.

Observation 803184e4-f0f6-4ee4-a0de-251ee31f5f40 · outbound

This paper cites CodeCarbon: Estimate and Track Carbon Emissions from Machine Learning Computing.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development CodeCarbon: Estimate and Track Carbon Emissions from Machine Learning Computing

Reference 23

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.328426Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation d76b19c4-e246-4b46-84d1-eae99783aa0a · outbound

This paper cites The developer coefficient.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development The developer coefficient

Reference 24

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.547116Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.

Observation e611f1ed-2882-49fa-9732-7d429c3bc7ba · outbound

This paper cites Models of sustainable software: A scoping review.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development Models of sustainable software: A scoping review

Reference 25

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.527167Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.

Observation a14a19d3-8c11-40e6-a192-78e0cd081db8 · outbound

This paper cites Learn to Code Sustainably: An Empirical Study on LLM-based Green Code Generation.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development Learn to Code Sustainably: An Empirical Study on LLM-based Green Code Generation

Reference 26

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.347191Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation c7164e5c-51a6-4565-9b4b-93e3ee765706 · outbound

This paper cites Carbon footprint evaluation of code generation through as a service.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development Carbon footprint evaluation of code generation through as a service

Reference 27

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.506624Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.

Observation 909e32c0-57c7-4659-9a51-65f68b40cc72 · outbound

This paper cites Venters, Rafael Capilla, Elisa Yumi Nakagawa, Stefanie Betz, Birgit Penzenstadler, Tom Crick, and Ian Brooks.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development Venters, Rafael Capilla, Elisa Yumi Nakagawa, Stefanie Betz, Birgit Penzenstadler, Tom Crick, and Ian Brooks

Reference 28

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.487132Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.

Observation 0564a16e-33b2-45bf-ac32-1dd53bbb7560 · outbound

This paper cites Exploring assessment criteria for sustainable software engineering processes.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development Exploring assessment criteria for sustainable software engineering processes

Reference 29

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.468762Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.

Observation 19d00516-0329-4d1e-a4c4-33fbd979b8f1 · outbound

This paper cites Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review.

Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Manual vs. LLM-Assisted Code Development Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review

Reference 30

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T23:31:10.369521Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Pith citing papers

No inbound Pith citation observations are available.