Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Convergence Analysis of the Alternating Anderson-Picard Method for Nonlinear Fixed-point Problems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.10472 v2 pith:SSJ5X5WC submitted 2024-07-15 math.NA cs.NA

classification math.NAcs.NA
keywords methodconvergencenonlinearlinearalternatinganalysisanderson-picardbeen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Anderson Acceleration (AA) has been widely used to solve nonlinear fixed-point problems due to its rapid convergence. This work focuses on a variant of AA in which multiple Picard iterations are performed between each AA step, referred to as the Alternating Anderson-Picard (AAP) method. Despite introducing more ``slow'' Picard iterations, this method has been shown to be efficient and even more robust in both linear and nonlinear cases. However, there is a lack of theoretical analysis for AAP in the nonlinear case. In this paper, we address this gap by establishing the equivalence between AAP and a multisecant-GMRES method that uses GMRES to solve a multisecant linear system at each iteration. From this perspective, we show that AAP ``converges'' to the Newton-GMRES method. Specifically, as the residual approaches zero, the multisecant matrix, the approximate Jacobian inverse, the search direction, and the optimization gain of AAP converge to their counterparts in the Newton-GMRES method. These connections provide insights for analyzing the asymptotic convergence properties of AAP. Consequently, we show that AAP is locally $q$-linear convergent and provide an upper bound for the convergence factor of AAP. To validate the theoretical results, numerical examples are provided.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A gradient-based and determinant-free framework for fully Bayesian Gaussian process regression

    math.NA 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A determinant-free, gradient-based HMC sampler for fully Bayesian GPR that uses the pseudofermion trick and pole expansions to avoid the kernel determinant.

Pith tools