Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Proxy Controls and Panel Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1810.00283 v8 pith:ST2QLBBD submitted 2018-09-30 econ.EM

classification econ.EM
keywords panelidentificationsettingscausalcontrolsdataeffectsestimate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We provide new results for nonparametric identification, estimation, and inference of causal effects using `proxy controls': observables that are noisy but informative proxies for unobserved confounding factors. Our analysis applies to cross-sectional settings but is particularly well-suited to panel models. Our identification results motivate a simple and `well-posed' nonparametric estimator. We derive convergence rates for the estimator and construct uniform confidence bands with asymptotically correct size. In panel settings, our methods provide a novel approach to the difficult problem of identification with non-separable, general heterogeneity and fixed $T$. In panels, observations from different periods serve as proxies for unobserved heterogeneity and our key identifying assumptions follow from restrictions on the serial dependence structure. We apply our methods to two empirical settings. We estimate consumer demand counterfactuals using panel data and we estimate causal effects of grade retention on cognitive performance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Adaptive Proximal Causal Inference with Some Invalid Proxies

    stat.ME 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Using LASSO-style penalties and a median trick over candidate proxies, the paper estimates causal effects when some treatment and outcome proxies violate exclusion restrictions.

  2. Philip G. Wright, directed acyclic graphs, and instrumental variables

    econ.EM 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A teaching-oriented editorial that recasts Wright's 1928 simultaneous equations appendix as an early contribution to instrumental variables and causal DAGs, with a modern GMM exposition.

Pith tools