Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Towards Optimizing and Evaluating a Retrieval Augmented QA Chatbot using LLMs with Human in the Loop

As of 20 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2407.05925.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2407.05925 v1

Coverage vector

measured 0 of 0 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 2 of 2 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00

measured 2 of 2 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-16T05:52:50.529508Z

measured 1 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z

Reference resolution

0 of 0 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact0
  • verified fuzzy0
  • unresolved0
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier0
  • metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

2
arxiv_reference, observed 2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z

Outbound references

No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.

Pith citing papers

Observation 0e88ca3d-683d-4cad-ab11-859631eeb11d · inbound

Can LLMs Be Trusted for Evaluating RAG Systems? A Survey of Methods and Datasets cites this paper.

Can LLMs Be Trusted for Evaluating RAG Systems? A Survey of Methods and Datasets Towards Optimizing and Evaluating a Retrieval Augmented QA Chatbot using LLMs with Human in the Loop

Reference 42

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T05:52:50.529508Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-16T05:52:50.529508Z digest=sha256:175ab68ab1445bef3b3209056088de3ec00d4f3095d8cd2ebd123aa0c0a65a34

Observation bdd4ec95-6856-4fb1-afc7-f36312ba84fd · inbound

Evaluating Multi-Hop Reasoning in RAG Systems: A Comparison of LLM-Based Retriever Evaluation Strategies cites this paper.

Evaluating Multi-Hop Reasoning in RAG Systems: A Comparison of LLM-Based Retriever Evaluation Strategies Towards Optimizing and Evaluating a Retrieval Augmented QA Chatbot using LLMs with Human in the Loop

Reference 1

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-10T04:04:47.592352Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-10T04:01:21.400171Z digest=sha256:b3af434f92aea9f6a42aebad9e98bee72b14892074d7a35312f32cce8206c343