Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 66 references

From K\"ahler Ricci solitons to Calabi-Yau K\"ahler cones

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read A Fano manifold with a Kähler–Ricci soliton gives Calabi–Yau cones after adding a large projective-space factor.

desk verdict Asymptotic Mabuchi–Nakagawa is proved cleanly via Han–Li's weighted YTD criterion; the paper deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.02564 v2 pith:SXT2DGFZ submitted 2024-12-03 math.DG math.AG

classification math.DGmath.AG MSC 53C2553C5532Q2014J45
keywords Kähler–RiccisolitonCalabi–YauconeSasaki–Einsteinmetricv-solitonweightedDingfunctionalK-stabilityFanomanifoldcoercivity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that soliton-type canonical metrics on a Fano manifold produce Ricci-flat cone metrics on a related space. More precisely, it claims that if the smooth Fano manifold $X$ admits a Kähler–Ricci soliton, then for every sufficiently large $k$ the canonical cone $K^\times_Z$ of $Z = X \times \mathbb{P}^k_{\mathbb{C}}$ carries a Ricci-flat Kähler cone metric, also called a Calabi–Yau cone. This is an asymptotic version of the conjecture that $k=0$ already works. The engine is Theorem 1.1: the set of weights $v$ for which the $v$-weighted Ding functional is coercive relative to the complexified torus is an open convex cone in the space of weights with vanishing $v$-Futaki invariant. The argument approximates the soliton weight $e^{\langle\tau,x\rangle}$ by explicit rational weights, obtains $v$-solitons on $X$ for all sufficiently large $N$, and converts the product soliton on $Z$ into a Calabi–Yau cone metric.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the $v$-weighted Ding functional $D_v$ on the space of $T$-invariant Kähler potentials: its critical points are exactly the $v$-solitons, and its coercivity relative to the complex torus $T^{\mathbb{C}}$ is the analytic criterion for existence. Theorem 1.1 proves that the coercive locus $D(X)$ is open and convex in $F(X)$ by a comparison estimate: if normalized weights $\bar v_1,\bar v_2$ satisfy $\inf_{P_X}(\bar v_1-\bar v_2)=-\lambda_0$, then $D_{v_1}-D_{v_2} \geq -\lambda_0 J(\omega) + \text{constant}$, so coercivity of slope $\Lambda_0$ at one weight transfers to nearby weights with slope $\Lambda_0-\lambda_0$. Convexity comes from linearity of the weighted Aubin–Mabuchi functional in the weight. The approximation sequence $v_N$ arises from convex volume functionals and an implicit-function-theorem deformation of the Kähler–Ricci soliton weight.

What would settle it

Take a smooth Fano $X$ with a Kähler–Ricci soliton and compute the weighted $\beta$-invariant of a $T$-equivariant prime divisor for the approximating weights $v_N$; finding $\beta_{v_N} < 0$ for arbitrarily large $N$ would contradict the openness of $S(X)$ and invalidate Theorem 1.2. Alternatively, producing weights $v_N \in F(X)$ that converge in $C^0$ to an existing soliton weight but admit no $v_N$-soliton for infinitely many $N$ would falsify the paper's central mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Let $X$ be a smooth Fano manifold and $T$ a maximal compact torus of automorphisms, with canonically normalized momentum polytope $P_X$. Let $F(X)$ be the cone of positive weight functions $v$ on $P_X$ whose $v$-Futaki invariant vanishes. Theorem 1.1 asserts that the subset $D(X)$ where the $v$-weighted Ding functional $D_v$ is $T^{\mathbb{C}}$-coercive is open and convex in $F(X)$. By the criterion of [37], a $v$-soliton exists exactly when $D_v$ is $T^{\mathbb{C}}$-coercive, so $S(X)=D(X)$. The main application, Theorem 1.2, constructs for a manifold $X$ admitting a Kähler–Ricci soliton a sequence of weights $v_N(x) = (1 - \langle x, \xi_N\rangle/N)^{-N}$ in $F(X)$ that converges uniformly to $e^{\langle\tau,x\rangle}$; for $N$ large these weights are in $S(X)$, the product of the resulting $v_N$-soliton with the Fubini–Study metric is a $v_N$-soliton on $Z = X \times \mathbb{P}^{N-n-2}_{\mathbb{C}}$ with weight of the form $\ell^{-(\dim Z+2)}$, and the correspondence of [3] turns this into a Ricci-flat Kähler cone metric on the canonical cone $K^\times_Z$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a $v$-soliton exists precisely when the $v$-weighted Ding functional is coercive; if that equivalence fails for some smooth positive weights, the openness theorem and the Calabi–Yau cone conclusion do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If $X$ admits a Kähler–Ricci soliton, then for every $k \geq k_0$ the canonical cone of $X \times \mathbb{P}^k_{\mathbb{C}}$ admits a Ricci-flat Kähler cone metric; the proof gives no explicit bound on $k_0$.
  • The projective-space factor can be replaced by any $k$-dimensional Kähler–Einstein Fano manifold.
  • A transversal Kähler–Ricci soliton on a Sasaki structure persists under nearby Sasaki–Reeb polarizations, recovering a known deformation theorem as Theorem 1.3.
  • A Kähler–Ricci soliton on $X$ forces $\langle\tau,x\rangle < n$ on the canonical polytope $P_X$, with the analogous bound $\langle\tau_\xi,x\rangle < n(\langle\xi,x\rangle+1)$ for transversal Kähler–Ricci solitons.
  • For a normalized $v$-soliton weight, the first Chern number satisfies $c_1(X)^n \leq \left(\frac{n+1}{\inf_{P_X} v}\right)^n$, a weighted version of Fujita's volume bound.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The openness theorem implies that the soliton locus is convex in weight space, so convex combinations of soliton weights in $F(X)$ should again admit solitons; the paper does not isolate this as a separate statement.
  • If the coercivity slope could be estimated explicitly from the Kähler–Ricci soliton weight, the proof would yield a quantitative $k_0$; the paper only establishes existence of some such $k_0$.
  • The weighted Fujita bound can be read as an obstruction on the size of admissible weights: a normalized $v$-soliton weight cannot have its minimum too small relative to the anti-canonical volume.
  • The same deformation mechanism, run through the Appendix A argument, should give openness of transversal Kähler–Ricci solitons for Fano orbifolds, an extension the paper gestures at in Remark 4.5 but does not state as a theorem.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the space S(X) of weight functions v on the momentum polytope of a smooth Fano manifold for which a v-soliton exists. The main structural result, Theorem 1.1, states that the coercivity locus D(X) of the v-weighted Ding functional is an open convex cone inside the vanishing-v-Futaki space F(X); combined with Han-Li's criterion S(X)=D(X), this yields quantitative openness of S(X). The main application, Theorem 1.2, shows that if X admits a Kähler-Ricci soliton, then for all sufficiently large k the product Z=X×P^k admits an ℓ^{-(dim Z+2)}-soliton, hence the canonical cone of Z is a Calabi-Yau cone, giving an asymptotic version of the Mabuchi-Nakagawa conjecture. The paper also proves relative openness of transversal KRS Sasaki structures (Theorem 1.3), an upper bound on the soliton potential (Theorem 1.4), and a weighted Fujita volume bound (Theorem 1.5), with an appendix giving a LeBrun-Simanca style deformation argument.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper gives a clean new route to constructing Calabi-Yau cones by perturbing KRS weights, and establishes openness of the v-soliton locus in C^0 topology as a corollary of Han-Li's analytic criterion. The proof of Theorem 1.2 is a genuine consequence of external results applied in their valid regime: Han-Li's weighted YTD theorem (Theorem 2.1) identifies S(X)=D(X), and the authors' earlier correspondence [3, Prop.2] converts ℓ^{-(m+2)}-solitons into Ricci-flat cone metrics. The approximation of the KRS weight by v_N via the implicit function theorem is explicit and coherent, and the absence of a quantitative k0 is honestly stated as a limitation. The secondary results give useful complements: a new Lichnerowicz-type obstruction and a weighted Fujita bound.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Introduction, organization paragraph] The organization paragraph says 'In Sect. 5, we prove Theorem 1.4' and then 'The final Sect. 5, we prove Theorem 1.5', but Theorem 1.5 is proved in Section 6; the numbering should be corrected.
  2. [Abstract and throughout] There are several typos that should be fixed: 'caries' should be 'carries', 'Nikagawa' should be 'Nakagawa', 'Licherowicz' should be 'Lichnerowicz', 'Fujita'a' should be 'Fujita's', and 'Ricci-flal' should be 'Ricci-flat'.
  3. [Equation (2.5)] The Duistermaat-Heckman measure is denoted dµDH in the text but the displayed equation (2.5) writes dµDM; the notation should be made uniform.
  4. [Proof of Theorem 1.1] The proof of convexity is too terse: the sentence 'The convexity of D(X) follows from the fact that the subspace of normalized weight functions is linearly convex' does not by itself explain why D(X) is a cone, since a cone also requires dilation invariance; a one-sentence clarification would be helpful.
  5. [Corollary 3.1 and proof of Theorem 1.1] In the comparison of normalized weights it is assumed that inf(˚v - ˚v0) = -λ0 with λ0 > 0; since both weights are normalized the case λ0 = 0 forces ˚v = ˚v0, but this reasoning is implicit and could be stated explicitly.
  6. [Appendix B, Corollary B.1] The maximum principle argument for positivity of the transversal scalar curvature is very compressed: at a minimum of Scal the displayed identity (B.2) gives ΔScal ≥ 0 and |Ric|² - Scal ≥ 0, which does not by itself show Scal > 0; the sign conventions for the Laplacian and the precise maximum principle argument should be expanded.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: Theorem 1.2 follows from the external Han–Li weighted YTD criterion and the independently established [3, Prop.2] correspondence, neither of which is equivalent to the target result.

full rationale

The claimed derivation chain is not circular. Theorem 1.2 is obtained by (i) constructing weights v_N in F(X) that converge uniformly to the KRS weight e^{<tau,x>}, with v_N's Futaki vanishing by construction; (ii) invoking the new openness Theorem 1.1, whose proof uses the external Han–Li theorem [37, Theorem 1.7] only to identify coercivity with existence of v-solitons; and (iii) converting the resulting product w_N-soliton on Z = X x P^{N-n-2} into a Ricci-flat Kähler cone metric via the earlier correspondence [3, Prop.2]. The Han–Li theorem is external to this paper and does not have the target result as an input. The same-author citations [3] and [41] supply supporting equivalences (v-solitons versus weighted cscK metrics, and the LeBrun–Simanca deformation argument) that are stated with their own assumptions and proved in prior work; they are used as tools, not as the conclusion. The weights v_N are not fitted to the output: their v-Futaki vanishing is the necessary normalization forced by membership in F(X), and convergence to the KRS weight is proved by the implicit function theorem. No equation in the paper defines a quantity in terms of the result it is used to prove, and the non-quantitative nature of k0 is explicitly acknowledged as a limitation. The central derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks, and no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters fitted to data and no new geometric or physical entities. The central claim rests on imported theorems: Han-Li's weighted YTD criterion, the authors' earlier [3] Sasaki correspondence, and Fujita's volume inequality. These are legitimate published results, but they carry most of the analytic burden.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Han-Li weighted YTD criterion: X admits a T-invariant v-soliton iff D_v is coercive relative to T^C, and S(X)=D(X).
    Stated as Theorem 2.1 and [37, Theorem 1.7]; it is the main bridge between coercivity and existence and is used without proof throughout the paper.
  • domain assumption Existence of T^C-orbit minimizers of the Aubin functional J, as used in the proof of Theorem 1.1.
    Imported from [37, Lemma 29]; needed to transfer coercivity from a representative to the infimum over the complex torus orbit.
  • domain assumption Apostolov-Jubert-Lahdili correspondence [3, Prop.2]: an l^{-(dim Z+2)}-soliton on a Fano Z is equivalent to a Calabi-Yau cone structure on K_Z^×.
    This is the final step of Theorem 1.2, converting the approximate soliton on the product into the desired Ricci-flat cone metric.
  • domain assumption Fujita volume lower bound [29, Theorem 2.3]: Vol(b^*K_X - xD) ≥ Vol(-K_X) - x^n for prime divisors over a Fano manifold X.
    Used without proof in Theorem 1.5; the theorem is imported as a black box and its hypotheses must cover the v-soliton case.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of From K\"ahler Ricci solitons to Calabi-Yau K\"ahler cones." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SXT2DGFZ

@misc{pith2026241202564,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: From K\"ahler Ricci solitons to Calabi-Yau K\"ahler cones},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SXT2DGFZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.02564}
}
abstract

We show that if $X$ is a smooth Fano manifold which caries a K\"ahler Ricci soliton, then the canonical cone of the product of $X$ with a complex projective space of sufficiently large dimension is a Calabi--Yau cone. This can be seen as an asymptotic version of a conjecture by Mabuchi and Nikagawa. This result is obtained by the openness of the set of weight functions $v$ over the momentum polytope of a given smooth Fano manifold, for which a $v$-soliton exists. We discuss other ramifications of this approach, including a Licherowicz type obstruction to the existence of a K\"ahler Ricci soliton and a Fujita type volume bound for the existence of a $v$-soliton.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Apostolov, D

    V. Apostolov, D. J. Calderbank, The CR geometry of weighted extremal Kahler and Sasaki metrics , Math. Ann. 379 (2021), 1047–1088

  2. [2]

    Apostolov, D

    V. Apostolov, D. J. Calderbank, E. Legendre, Weighted K-stability of polarized varieties and extremal- ity of Sasaki manifolds , Advances in Math. 391 (2021), Paper No 107969

  3. [3]

    Apostolov, S

    V. Apostolov, S. Jubert and A. Lahdili, Weighted K-stability and coercivity with applications to ex- tremal K¨ ahler and Sasaki metrics, Geometry & Topology 8 (2023), 3229–3302

  4. [4]

    Atiyah, Convexity and commuting Hamiltonians , Bull

    M.F. Atiyah, Convexity and commuting Hamiltonians , Bull. London Math. Soc. 14 (1982) 1—15

  5. [5]

    Aubin, R´ eduction du cas positif de l’´ equation de Monge-Amp` eere sur les vari´ et´ es k¨ ahl´ eriennes compactes ` a la d´ emonstration d’une in´ egalit´ e, J

    Th. Aubin, R´ eduction du cas positif de l’´ equation de Monge-Amp` eere sur les vari´ et´ es k¨ ahl´ eriennes compactes ` a la d´ emonstration d’une in´ egalit´ e, J. Funct. Anal. 57 (1984), 143–153

  6. [6]

    Berline, M

    M. Berline, M. Vergne, Z´ eros d’un champs de vecteur et classes charact´ eristiques ´ equivarientes, Duke Math. J. 50 (1983), 539–549

  7. [7]

    Berman, K-polystability of Q-Fano varieties admitting K¨ ahler-Einstein metrics, Invent

    R. Berman, K-polystability of Q-Fano varieties admitting K¨ ahler-Einstein metrics, Invent. Math. 203 (2016), 973—1025

  8. [8]

    The projective space has maximal volume among all toric K\"ahler-Einstein manifolds

    R. Berman and B. Berndtsson, The projective space has maximal volume among all toric K¨ ahler- Einstein manifolds , arXiv:1112.4445

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    Berman and B

    R. Berman and B. Berndtsson, The volume of K¨ ahler–Einstein Fano varieties and convex bodies , J. Reine Angew. Math., 723 (2017), 127–152

  2. [10]

    Berman, S

    R. Berman, S. Boucksom and M. Jonsson, A variational approach to the Yau-Tian-Donaldson conjec- ture, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 34 (2021), 605–652

  3. [11]

    R. J. Berman and D. Witt-Nystr¨ om,Complex optimal transport and the pluripotential theory of K¨ ahler- Ricci solitons, arXiv:1401.8264. 27

  4. [12]

    Boucksom, C

    S. Boucksom, C. Favre and M. Jonsson, Differentiability of volumes of divisors and a problem of Teissier. J. Algebraic Geom. 18 (2009), 279—308

  5. [13]

    Boyer, H.Huang, E

    C. Boyer, H.Huang, E. Legendre, C. W. Tønnesen–Friedman,Existence and Non-Existence of Constant Scalar Curvature and Extremal Sasaki Metrics , Math. Z. 304 (2023), Article No 61

  6. [14]

    C. P. Boyer and C. van Coevering, Relative K-stability and extremal Sasaki metrics , Math. Res. Lett. 28 (2018), 1–19

  7. [15]

    Calabi, On K¨ ahler manifolds with vanishing canonical class, in Algebraic Geometry and Topology : A symposium in honour of Lefschetz, Princeton University Press (1955), 78–89

    E. Calabi, On K¨ ahler manifolds with vanishing canonical class, in Algebraic Geometry and Topology : A symposium in honour of Lefschetz, Princeton University Press (1955), 78–89

  8. [16]

    H.-D. Cao, G. Tian and X. Zhu, K¨ ahler–Ricci solitons on compact complex manifolds withc1(M ) > 0, Geom. Funct. Anal. 15 (2005), 697–719

  9. [17]

    Donaldson and S

    X.X.Chen, S. Donaldson and S. Sun, K¨ ahler–Einstein metrics on Fano manifolds, I: approximation of metrics with cone singularities . J. Amer. Math. Soc. 28 (2015), 183—197

  10. [18]

    Donaldson and S

    X.X.Chen, S. Donaldson and S. Sun, K¨ ahler–Einstein metrics on Fano manifolds, II: limits with cone angle less than 2π. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 28 (2015), 199—234

  11. [19]

    Donaldson and S

    X.X.Chen, S. Donaldson and S. Sun, K¨ ahler–Einstein metrics on Fano manifolds, III: limits as cone angle approaches 2π and completion of the main proof . J. Amer. Math. Soc. 28 (2015), 235—278

  12. [20]

    X.X. Chen, S. Sun and B. Wang, K¨ ahler-Ricci flow, K¨ ahler-Einstein metric, and K-stability, Geometry & Topology 22 (2018), 3145–3173

  13. [21]

    Collins and G

    T. Collins and G. Sz´ ekelyhidi, K-semistability for irregular Sasaki manifolds , J. Differential Geom. 109 (2018), 81–109

  14. [22]

    Collins and G

    T. Collins and G. Sz´ ekelyhidi, Sasaki-Einstein metrics and K-stability , Geometry & Topology 23 (2019), 1339–1413

  15. [23]

    Darvas and Y

    T. Darvas and Y. Rubinstein, Tian ’s properness conjectures and Finsler geometry of the space of K¨ ahler metrics, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 30 (2017), 347–387

  16. [24]

    Datar and G

    V. Datar and G. Sz´ ekelyhidi, K¨ ahler-Einstein metrics along the smooth continuity method . Geom. Funct. Anal. 26 (2016), 975–1010

  17. [25]

    Delcroix, Weight sensibility in K-stability of Fano varieties , arXiv:2411.07864

    T. Delcroix, Weight sensibility in K-stability of Fano varieties , arXiv:2411.07864

  18. [26]

    Dervan, E

    R. Dervan, E. Legendre Valuative stability of polarized varieties , Math. Ann. 385 (2023), 357–391

  19. [27]

    Donaldson, Scalar curvature and stability of toric varieties

    S. Donaldson, Scalar curvature and stability of toric varieties . J. Differential Geom. 62 (2002), 289— 349

  20. [28]

    Duistermaat and G

    J. Duistermaat and G. J. Heckman, On the variation in the cohomology of the symplectic form of the reduced phase space, Invent. Math. 69 (1982), 259—268

  21. [29]

    Fujita, Optimal bounds for the volumes of K¨ ahler-Einstein Fano manifolds , American J

    K. Fujita, Optimal bounds for the volumes of K¨ ahler-Einstein Fano manifolds , American J. Math., 140 (2018), 391–414

  22. [30]

    Futaki, An obstruction to the existence of Einstein K¨ ahler metrics, Invent

    A. Futaki, An obstruction to the existence of Einstein K¨ ahler metrics, Invent. Math. 73 (1983) 437— 443

  23. [31]

    Mabuchi Bilinear forms and extremal K¨ ahler vector fields associated with K¨ ahler classes, Math

    A.Futaki and T. Mabuchi Bilinear forms and extremal K¨ ahler vector fields associated with K¨ ahler classes, Math. Ann. 301 (1995) 199–210

  24. [32]

    Futaki, H

    A. Futaki, H. Ono, G. Wang, Transverse K¨ ahler geometry of Sasaki manifolds and toric Sasaki– Einstein manifolds J. Differential Geom. 83, (2009) 585–635

  25. [33]

    Gauduchon Calabi’s extremal metrics: An elementary introduction , Lecture notes available upon request

    P. Gauduchon Calabi’s extremal metrics: An elementary introduction , Lecture notes available upon request

  26. [34]

    Gauntlett, D

    J.P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, J. Sparks, S.-T. Yau Obstructions to the Existence of Sasaki–Einstein Metrics. Commun. Math. Phys. 273 (2007), 803–827

  27. [35]

    Guillemin and S

    V. Guillemin and S. Sternberg, Convexity properties of the moment mapping , Invent. Math. 67 (1982), 491—513

  28. [36]

    Hallam, The Geometry and Stability of Fibrations , Oxford PhD thesis 2022, availabe at https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:941370e7-4267-40ce-ae45-8b009c168130

    M. Hallam, The Geometry and Stability of Fibrations , Oxford PhD thesis 2022, availabe at https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:941370e7-4267-40ce-ae45-8b009c168130

  29. [37]

    Han and C

    J. Han and C. Li, On the Yau-Tian-Donaldson conjecture for generalized K¨ ahler-Ricci soliton equa- tions, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 76 (2023), 1793–1867

  30. [38]

    J. Han, C. Li, Algebraic uniqueness of K¨ ahler-Ricci flow limits and optimal degenerations of Fano varieties, Geometry & Topology 28 (2024) 539—592

  31. [39]

    H¨ attig, J

    D. H¨ attig, J. Hausen, H. S¨ uss, Log DelPezzo C∗-surfaces, K¨ ahler–Einstein metrics, K¨ ahler–Ricci solitons and sasaki–Einstein metrics , to appear in Michigan Math. J., arXiv:2306.03796v1

  32. [40]

    He and S

    W. He and S. Sun, Frankel conjecture and Sasaki geometry, Adv. Math. 291 (2016), 912—960

  33. [41]

    Lahdili, K¨ ahler metrics with constant weighted scalar curvature and weighted K-stability , Proc

    A. Lahdili, K¨ ahler metrics with constant weighted scalar curvature and weighted K-stability , Proc. London Math. Soc. 119 (2019), 1065–1114

  34. [42]

    Lazarsfeld, Positivity in algebraic geometry I: Classical setting line bundles and linear series

    R. Lazarsfeld, Positivity in algebraic geometry I: Classical setting line bundles and linear series. Ergeb- nisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics,

  35. [43]

    LeBrun and S

    C.R. LeBrun and S. Simanca, Extremal K¨ ahler metrics and complex deformation theory, Geom. Funct. Anal. 4 (1994), 298–336

  36. [44]

    K. L. Lee, J. Sturm and X. Wang, Moment map, convex function and extremal point, arXiv:2208.03724

  37. [45]

    Li, Minimizing normalized volumes of valuations , Math

    C. Li, Minimizing normalized volumes of valuations , Math. Z. 289 (2018), 491–513

  38. [46]

    Li, G-uniform stability and K¨ ahler-Einstein metrics on singular Fano varieties, Invent

    C. Li, G-uniform stability and K¨ ahler-Einstein metrics on singular Fano varieties, Invent. Math. 227 (2022), 661–744

  39. [47]

    C. Li, Y. Liu, C. Xu A guided tour to normalized volume , Geometric Analysis, volume 333 of Progr. Math., pages 167-219. Birkauser/Springer, Cham, 2020

  40. [48]

    xviii+387 p 28 V

    Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004. xviii+387 p 28 V. APOSTOLOV, A. LAHDILI, AND E. LEGENDRE

  41. [49]

    Lichnerowicz, G´ eom´ etrie des groupes de transformation, Travaux et Recherches Math´ ematiques 3, Dunod (1958)

    A. Lichnerowicz, G´ eom´ etrie des groupes de transformation, Travaux et Recherches Math´ ematiques 3, Dunod (1958)

  42. [50]

    Mabuchi, Multiplier Hermitian structures on K¨ ahler manifolds, Nagoya J

    T. Mabuchi, Multiplier Hermitian structures on K¨ ahler manifolds, Nagoya J. Math. 170 (2003), 73– 115

  43. [51]

    Mabuchi and Y

    T. Mabuchi and Y. Nakagawa, New examples of Sasaki–Einstein manifolds , Tohoku Math. J. 65 (2013), 243-252

  44. [52]

    Martelli, J

    D. Martelli, J. Sparks, S.-T. Yau Sasaki-Einstein manifolds and volume minimisation , Comm. Math. Phys. 280 (2008), 611–673

  45. [53]

    Matsushima, Sur la structure du groupe d’hom´ eomorphismes analytiques d’une certaine vari´ et´ e k¨ ahl´ erienne, Nagoya Math

    Y. Matsushima, Sur la structure du groupe d’hom´ eomorphismes analytiques d’une certaine vari´ et´ e k¨ ahl´ erienne, Nagoya Math. J. 11 (1957), 145—150

  46. [54]

    Jerison, D

    D. Jerison, D. and J. M. Lee, Extremals for the Sobolev inequalitiy for the Heisenberg group and the CR Yamabe problem. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 1 (1988), 1—13

  47. [55]

    Petersen and W

    P. Petersen and W. Wylie, Rigidity of gradient Ricci solitons , Pacific J. Math. 241 (2009), 329–345

  48. [56]

    Petrecca, On Sasaki–Ricci solitons and their deformations , Adv

    D. Petrecca, On Sasaki–Ricci solitons and their deformations , Adv. Geom. 16 (2016), 57–70

  49. [57]

    Ross and R.P

    J. Ross and R.P. Thomas An obstruction to the existence of constant scalar curvature K¨ ahler metrics J. Differential Geom. 72 (2006), no. 3, 429-466

  50. [58]

    Tian, K¨ ahler–Einstein metrics with positive scalar curvature

    G. Tian, K¨ ahler–Einstein metrics with positive scalar curvature. Invent. Math. 130 (1997), 1–37

  51. [59]

    Tian, K-stability and K¨ ahler–Einstein metrics

    G. Tian, K-stability and K¨ ahler–Einstein metrics. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 68 (2015), 1085–1156; Corrigendum, 68 (2015), 2082–2083

  52. [60]

    Tian and X

    G. Tian and X. Zhu, A new holomorphic invariant and uniqueness of K¨ ahler-Ricci solitons, Comment. Math. Helv. 77 (2002) 297–325

  53. [61]

    Tian and X

    G. Tian and X. Zhu, Uniqueness of K¨ ahler-Ricci solitons, Acta Math. 184 (2000), 271–305

  54. [62]

    van Coevering, Examples of asymptotically conical Ricci-flat K¨ ahler manifolds, Math

    C. van Coevering, Examples of asymptotically conical Ricci-flat K¨ ahler manifolds, Math. Z. 267 (2011), 465–496

  55. [63]

    S. T. Yau, Open problems in Geometry . In: Differential Geometry: Partial Differential Equations on Manifolds. Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 54, pp. 1–28. AMS, Los Angeles, CA (1990)

  56. [64]

    Wang A valuative criterion of K-polystability , arXiv:2406.06176

    L. Wang A valuative criterion of K-polystability , arXiv:2406.06176

  57. [65]

    Woodward, Moment maps and geometric invariant theory , Les cours du CIRM, Tome 1 (2010) no

    C. Woodward, Moment maps and geometric invariant theory , Les cours du CIRM, Tome 1 (2010) no. 1, pp. 55-98

  58. [66]

    Zhang, A quantization proof of the uniform Yau–Tian–Donaldson conjecture

    K. Zhang, A quantization proof of the uniform Yau–Tian–Donaldson conjecture . J. Eur. Math. Soc. (2023), published online, DOI 10.4171/JEMS/1373. Vestislav Apostolov, D´epartement de Math´ematiques, UQAM, C.P. 8888, Succursale Centre- ville, Montr´eal (Qu´ebec), H3C 3P8, Canad...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.