Pith. sign in

REVIEW

XR Input Error Mediation for Hand-Based Input: Task and Context Influences a User's Preference

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.10899 v1 pith:SYBFWABZ submitted 2023-09-19 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords mediationusererrorimpacttasktechniquesuserscontext
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Many XR devices use bare-hand gestures to reduce the need for handheld controllers. Such gestures, however, lead to false positive and false negative recognition errors, which detract from the user experience. While mediation techniques enable users to overcome recognition errors by clarifying their intentions via UI elements, little research has explored how mediation techniques should be designed in XR and how a user's task and context may impact their design preferences. This research presents empirical studies about the impact of user perceived error costs on users' preferences for three mediation technique designs, under different simulated scenarios that were inspired by real-life tasks. Based on a large-scale crowd-sourced survey and an immersive VR-based user study, our results suggest that the varying contexts within each task type can impact users' perceived error costs, leading to different preferred mediation techniques. We further discuss the study implications of these results on future XR interaction design.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools