pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.19503 · v1 · pith:T2B53GWEnew · submitted 2026-06-17 · ✦ hep-lat

Kernel transformations and bounds for smeared spectral functions

William I. Jay , Matteo Saccardi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 18:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-lat
keywords smeared spectral functionskernel transformationsanalytic conditionserror boundsinverse problemslattice QCDspectral positivity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Analytic conditions enable exact transformations between spectral functions smeared by different kernels, with direct error bounds when exact maps are unavailable.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out conditions under which smeared spectral functions computed with one kernel can be converted exactly into those computed with another kernel, without introducing arbitrary regularization. Explicit conversion formulas are given for several pairs, such as Cauchy to Gaussian and mixtures of Gaussians with different widths. When an exact map does not exist, regulated transformations are supplied together with computable bounds on the systematic error that follow from the input data alone. Errors, whether statistical or given as pointwise bounds, are propagated forward, and the positivity of the underlying spectrum can be used to shrink the resulting uncertainty intervals.

Core claim

A framework is developed for transforming between smeared spectral functions computed using different smearing kernels. Analytic conditions are established for the maps to exist and converge without arbitrary regularization. Explicit expressions are provided for several kernel classes of interest, including Cauchy-to-Gaussian transformations and Gaussian-to-Cauchy width mixtures. When exact transformations are unavailable, the inverse problem is tackled through regulated maps paired with bounds on the associated systematic error, directly computable from the given input data. Errors on the input smeared spectral functions, either statistical or in the form of pointwise rigorous bounds, are t

What carries the argument

Kernel transformation maps between different smearing functions, defined under analytic conditions on the spectral function that guarantee convergence without extra regularization.

If this is right

  • Exact maps exist between certain kernel families once the spectral function satisfies the required analyticity.
  • Systematic-error bounds for regulated maps are obtained directly from the supplied smeared data without additional modeling.
  • Input uncertainties, statistical or rigorous, propagate to the final transformed observables.
  • Positivity constraints on the spectrum reduce the size of the allowed error intervals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Lattice results obtained with one smearing choice can be compared directly with results or phenomenology that use a different choice.
  • The same transformation machinery may apply to other inverse problems that involve energy smearing or resolution functions.
  • If the analytic conditions can be verified on a given ensemble, multiple kernel computations become redundant.

Load-bearing premise

The spectral functions possess enough analyticity and positivity that the kernel maps remain well-defined and the derived bounds stay useful.

What would settle it

An explicit spectral function obeying positivity whose Cauchy-smeared version cannot be mapped to a Gaussian-smeared version within the stated analytic conditions, or for which the computed error bound is violated by the actual difference.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.19503 by Matteo Saccardi, William I. Jay.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The transition kernel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The transition kernel for a Gaussian-to-Cauchy width [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. RK bounds for the transition kernel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Determination of the optimal smearing parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Rigorous Cauchy-to-Cauchy sharpening ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. RK bounds with the positive L´evy kernel, see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Gaussian-to-Cauchy reconstructions at different val [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Exponential-to-Gaussian and exponential-to-Cauchy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This work develops a framework for transforming between smeared spectral functions computed using different smearing kernels. The kernel-transformation problem naturally arises when information is available for one family of energy-smeared observables, while phenomenology or comparison with other calculations require a different smearing. For exact transformations, analytic conditions are established for the maps to exist and converge without arbitrary regularization. Explicit expressions are provided for several kernel classes of interest, including Cauchy-to-Gaussian transformations and Gaussian-to-Cauchy width mixtures. When exact transformations are unavailable, the inverse problem is tackled through regulated maps paired with bounds on the associated systematic error, directly computable from the given input data. Errors on the input smeared spectral functions, either statistical or in the form of pointwise rigorous bounds, are then propagated to the target observables. Enforcing spectral positivity can be used to tighten the bounds.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a framework for transforming smeared spectral functions between different kernels. Analytic conditions are established under which exact transformations exist and converge without regularization. Explicit expressions are derived for several kernel classes, including Cauchy-to-Gaussian maps and Gaussian-to-Cauchy width mixtures. When exact transformations are unavailable, the work introduces regulated maps together with directly computable bounds on the systematic error; input errors (statistical or rigorous pointwise bounds) are propagated to the target, and spectral positivity is used to tighten the resulting bounds.

Significance. If the analytic conditions hold for the spectral functions that arise in lattice QCD, the framework would supply a controlled route to convert between different smearing prescriptions and to obtain rigorous bounds on the inverse problem without ad-hoc regularization. The explicit kernel expressions and the computable error bounds constitute concrete, reusable tools that could reduce systematic uncertainty when comparing smeared observables across calculations.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claim that exact kernel transformations exist and converge under stated analytic conditions (abstract) is load-bearing for the entire framework. The manuscript does not verify that the analyticity and positivity properties required by these conditions are satisfied by spectral functions reconstructed from finite Euclidean lattice correlators, whose analytic continuation is limited by volume, discretization, and statistical noise. Without such verification or a concrete counter-example test, the applicability to hep-lat data remains unestablished.
  2. When exact transformations are unavailable, the regulated maps are paired with bounds on the systematic error that are asserted to be computable directly from the input data (abstract). No explicit derivation or numerical demonstration is supplied showing that these bounds remain finite and useful when the input spectral function only approximately satisfies the analyticity premise; this gap directly affects the claimed utility of the regulated procedure.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the various kernels and their widths should be introduced with a single consolidated table or figure early in the text to aid readability.
  2. The propagation of input errors to the target observables is described at a high level; a short worked example with explicit formulas would clarify the procedure.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major comment below, clarifying the scope of the work and indicating revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that exact kernel transformations exist and converge under stated analytic conditions (abstract) is load-bearing for the entire framework. The manuscript does not verify that the analyticity and positivity properties required by these conditions are satisfied by spectral functions reconstructed from finite Euclidean lattice correlators, whose analytic continuation is limited by volume, discretization, and statistical noise. Without such verification or a concrete counter-example test, the applicability to hep-lat data remains unestablished.

    Authors: The manuscript derives the precise analytic conditions (analyticity in a strip of the complex plane together with positivity) under which exact, convergent kernel transformations exist without regularization. These conditions are stated explicitly and are the central contribution; the framework applies whenever they hold. We agree that spectral functions reconstructed from finite-volume, discretized Euclidean correlators satisfy the conditions only approximately. The regulated maps and associated bounds are introduced exactly for this practical regime. Because the paper develops the general mathematical framework rather than applying it to specific lattice ensembles, no numerical verification on lattice data is included. We will add a paragraph in the introduction and conclusions relating the stated conditions to typical lattice reconstructions and noting that the regulated procedure is designed for approximate satisfaction of analyticity. revision: partial

  2. Referee: When exact transformations are unavailable, the regulated maps are paired with bounds on the systematic error that are asserted to be computable directly from the input data (abstract). No explicit derivation or numerical demonstration is supplied showing that these bounds remain finite and useful when the input spectral function only approximately satisfies the analyticity premise; this gap directly affects the claimed utility of the regulated procedure.

    Authors: Sections 4 and 5 contain the explicit derivation of the regulated maps and the error bounds, showing that the bounds are obtained directly from the input smeared spectral function, its statistical or rigorous pointwise errors, and the chosen regulation parameter. The regulation is constructed so that the bounds remain finite even when analyticity holds only approximately; the truncation error induced by regulation is included in the bound. We acknowledge that an explicit numerical illustration would strengthen the claim of utility and will add a short example in the revised manuscript using a model spectral function that satisfies the analyticity condition only approximately. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; mathematical framework is self-contained

full rationale

The paper develops a mathematical framework establishing analytic conditions for kernel transformations between smeared spectral functions and provides explicit expressions for specific kernel classes. When exact maps are unavailable, it uses regulated maps with bounds computed directly from input data. No steps reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations; the derivation relies on stated analyticity and positivity assumptions applied to external inputs rather than internal redefinitions. This is the standard case of a self-contained mathematical construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on standard domain assumptions about spectral functions in quantum field theory; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Smeared spectral functions admit analytic kernel transformations under stated convergence conditions and possess positivity that can be used to tighten bounds.
    Invoked when the abstract asserts existence of exact maps and the utility of positivity enforcement.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5665 in / 1140 out tokens · 42824 ms · 2026-06-26T18:09:44.594393+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 18 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    (81) is satisfied for allωand all positiveε

    Positivity: Eq. (81) is satisfied for allωand all positiveε

  2. [2]

    Divergence asε→0 +:ρ c ε+(ω)−ρ c ε−(ω) diverges polynomially in 1/ε, with the lower and upper bounds saturating the trivial bounds of 0 and∞, respectively

  3. [3]

    Convergence of the bounds for largeε: asε→+∞, the bounds approach the true resultρ c ε±(ω)→ ρc ε(ω) polynomially inε. 11 −100 −10−1 0 10−1 100 K g←c σ←ε(ω′ − ω) (a)K(ω) > 0 K(ω) < 0 −100 −10−1 −10−2 0 10−2 10−1 100 (b)max[K(ω)ρc ε±(ω)] [Kρ c ε]−(ω) −1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 ω/σ 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 ρc ε(ω) (c)ρc ε(ω) ρc ε+(ω) ρc ε−(ω) −1 0 1 2 3 4 5 ...

  4. [4]

    relaxations

    For simplicity, and since the ex- act values are known in this example,χ 2 0/Nt ≈0.8 was chosen to match theχ 2 between the noisy and exact cor- relator values. As emphasized in Refs. [32–34], this choice has a statistical interpretation. In phenomenological ap- plications, care must be taken in choosingχ 2 0 appropri- ately. 8 All quantities are given in...

  5. [5]

    Alibertiet al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: an update, Phys

    R. Alibertiet al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: an update, Phys. Rept. 1143, 1 (2025), arXiv:2505.21476 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Bailas, S

    G. Bailas, S. Hashimoto, and T. Ishikawa, Reconstruction of smeared spectral function from Euclidean correlation functions, PTEP2020, 043B07 (2020), arXiv:2001.11779 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Gambino and S

    P. Gambino and S. Hashimoto, Inclusive Semileptonic Decays from Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 032001 (2020), arXiv:2005.13730 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Evangelista, R

    A. Evangelista, R. Frezzotti, N. Tantalo, G. Gagliardi, F. Sanfilippo, S. Simula, and V. Lubicz (Extended Twisted Mass), Inclusive hadronic decay rate of theτlep- ton from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D108, 074513 (2023), arXiv:2308.03125 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    Alexandrouet al.(Extended Twisted Mass), Inclusive Hadronic Decay Rate of theτLepton from Lattice QCD: The u¯s Flavor Channel and the Cabibbo Angle, Phys

    C. Alexandrouet al.(Extended Twisted Mass), Inclusive Hadronic Decay Rate of theτLepton from Lattice QCD: The u¯s Flavor Channel and the Cabibbo Angle, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 261901 (2024), arXiv:2403.05404 [hep- lat]

    arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    J¨ uttner, Standard Model tests with smeared experi- ment and theory (2026), arXiv:2603.15487 [hep-lat]

    A. J¨ uttner, Standard Model tests with smeared experi- ment and theory (2026), arXiv:2603.15487 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2026

  11. [11]

    Davier, A

    M. Davier, A. Hocker, and Z. Zhang, The Physics of Hadronic Tau Decays, Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 1043 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0507078

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  12. [12]

    E. C. Poggio, H. R. Quinn, and S. Weinberg, Smearing the Quark Model, Phys. Rev. D13, 1958 (1976)

    1958

  13. [13]

    Luscher, SELECTED TOPICS IN LATTICE FIELD THEORY, Conf

    M. Luscher, SELECTED TOPICS IN LATTICE FIELD THEORY, Conf. Proc. C880628, 451 (1988)

    1988

  14. [14]

    Maiani and M

    L. Maiani and M. Testa, Final state interactions from Euclidean correlation functions, Phys. Lett. B245, 585 (1990)

    1990

  15. [15]

    J. C. A. Barata and K. Fredenhagen, Particle scattering in Euclidean lattice field theories, Commun. Math. Phys. 138, 507 (1991)

    1991

  16. [16]

    M. T. Hansen, H. B. Meyer, and D. Robaina, From deep inelastic scattering to heavy-flavor semileptonic decays: Total rates into multihadron final states from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D96, 094513 (2017), arXiv:1704.08993 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  17. [17]

    Bulava and M

    J. Bulava and M. T. Hansen, Scattering amplitudes from finite-volume spectral functions, Phys. Rev. D100, 034521 (2019), arXiv:1903.11735 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2019

  18. [18]

    Bruno and M

    M. Bruno and M. T. Hansen, Variations on the Maiani- Testa approach and the inverse problem, JHEP06, 043, arXiv:2012.11488 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2012

  19. [19]

    Patella and N

    A. Patella and N. Tantalo, Scattering amplitudes from Euclidean correlators: Haag-Ruelle theory and approxi- mation formulae, JHEP01, 091, arXiv:2407.02069 [hep- lat]

    arXiv

  20. [20]

    Cabibbo and R

    N. Cabibbo and R. Gatto, Electron Positron Colliding Beam Experiments, Phys. Rev.124, 1577 (1961)

    1961

  21. [21]

    Cabibbo, G

    N. Cabibbo, G. Parisi, and M. Testa, Hadron Production in e+ e- Collisions, Lett. Nuovo Cim.4S1, 35 (1970)

    1970

  22. [22]

    Alexandrouet al.(Extended Twisted Mass Collabo- ration (ETMC)), Probing the Energy-Smeared R Ratio Using Lattice QCD, Phys

    C. Alexandrouet al.(Extended Twisted Mass Collabo- ration (ETMC)), Probing the Energy-Smeared R Ratio Using Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 241901 (2023), arXiv:2212.08467 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    F. A. Bresciani, M. Bruno, and M. T. Hansen, Finite- volume effects on smeared spectral densities (2026), arXiv:2606.14349 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    Bulava, M

    J. Bulava, M. T. Hansen, M. W. Hansen, A. Patella, and N. Tantalo, Inclusive rates from smeared spectral den- sities in the two-dimensional O(3) non-linearσ-model, JHEP07, 034, arXiv:2111.12774 [hep-lat]

    arXiv

  25. [25]

    Luscher, Volume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in Massive Quantum Field Theories

    M. Luscher, Volume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in Massive Quantum Field Theories. 1. Stable Particle States, Commun. Math. Phys.104, 177 (1986)

    1986

  26. [26]

    Luscher, Volume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in Massive Quantum Field Theories

    M. Luscher, Volume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in Massive Quantum Field Theories. 2. Scattering States, Commun. Math. Phys.105, 153 (1986)

    1986

  27. [27]

    Luscher, Two particle states on a torus and their re- lation to the scattering matrix, Nucl

    M. Luscher, Two particle states on a torus and their re- lation to the scattering matrix, Nucl. Phys. B354, 531 (1991)

    1991

  28. [28]

    Rummukainen and S

    K. Rummukainen and S. A. Gottlieb, Resonance scatter- ing phase shifts on a nonrest frame lattice, Nucl. Phys. B450, 397 (1995), arXiv:hep-lat/9503028

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  29. [29]

    Lellouch and M

    L. Lellouch and M. Luscher, Weak transition matrix ele- ments from finite volume correlation functions, Commun. Math. Phys.219, 31 (2001), arXiv:hep-lat/0003023

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  30. [30]

    C. h. Kim, C. T. Sachrajda, and S. R. Sharpe, Finite- volume effects for two-hadron states in moving frames, Nucl. Phys. B727, 218 (2005), arXiv:hep-lat/0507006

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  31. [31]

    M. T. Hansen and S. R. Sharpe, Relativistic, model- independent, three-particle quantization condition, Phys. Rev. D90, 116003 (2014), arXiv:1408.5933 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  32. [32]

    R. A. Briceno, J. J. Dudek, and R. D. Young, Scattering processes and resonances from lattice QCD, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 025001 (2018), arXiv:1706.06223 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    M. T. Hansen and S. R. Sharpe, Lattice QCD and Three- particle Decays of Resonances, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69, 65 (2019), arXiv:1901.00483 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    Abbott, W

    R. Abbott, W. I. Jay, and P. R. Oare, Moment problems and bounds for matrix-valued smeared spectral functions (2025), arXiv:2508.01377 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    I. V. Kovalishina, Analytic theory of a class of interpo- lation problems, Mathematics of the USSR-Izvestiya22, 419 (1984)

    1984

  36. [36]

    Lawrence, Model-free spectral reconstruction via La- grange duality (2024), arXiv:2408.11766 [hep-lat]

    S. Lawrence, Model-free spectral reconstruction via La- grange duality (2024), arXiv:2408.11766 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Abbott, S

    R. Abbott, S. Fields, W. I. Jay, P. Oare, and M. Sac- cardi, The Causal Bootstrap: Bounding Smeared Spec- tral Functions from Non-Perturbative Euclidean Data (2026), arXiv:2605.20509 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    Mutzel and A

    S. Mutzel and A. Tilloy, Certified spectral functions from lattice Monte Carlo data (2026), arXiv:2606.09791 [hep- lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  39. [39]

    Bruno, L

    M. Bruno, L. Giusti, and M. Saccardi, On the prediction of spectral densities from Lattice QCD, Nuovo Cim. C 47, 197 (2024), arXiv:2310.16243 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Di Carlo, F

    M. Di Carlo, F. Erben, and M. T. Hansen, Long dis- tance contributions to neutral D-meson mixing from lat- tice QCD, JHEP07, 229, arXiv:2504.16189 [hep-lat]

    arXiv

  41. [41]

    Candido, L

    A. Candido, L. Del Debbio, T. Giani, and G. Petrillo, Bayesian inference with Gaussian processes for the de- termination of parton distribution functions, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 716 (2024), arXiv:2404.07573 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    Del Debbio, A

    L. Del Debbio, A. Lupo, M. Panero, and N. Tantalo, Multi-representation dynamics of SU(4) composite Higgs models: chiral limit and spectral reconstructions, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 220 (2023), arXiv:2211.09581 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    Gambino, S

    P. Gambino, S. Hashimoto, S. M¨ achler, M. Panero, 24 F. Sanfilippo, S. Simula, A. Smecca, and N. Tantalo, Lat- tice QCD study of inclusive semileptonic decays of heavy mesons, JHEP07, 083, arXiv:2203.11762 [hep-lat]

    arXiv

  44. [44]

    Barone, S

    A. Barone, S. Hashimoto, A. J¨ uttner, T. Kaneko, and R. Kellermann, Approaches to inclusive semileptonic B(s)-meson decays from Lattice QCD, JHEP07, 145, arXiv:2305.14092 [hep-lat]

    arXiv

  45. [45]

    Kellermann, Z

    R. Kellermann, Z. Hu, A. Barone, A. Elgaziari, S. Hashimoto, T. Kaneko, and A. J¨ uttner, Inclusive semileptonic decays from lattice QCD: Analysis of sys- tematic effects, Phys. Rev. D112, 014501 (2025), arXiv:2504.03358 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Kellermann, A

    R. Kellermann, A. Barone, A. Elgaziari, S. Hashimoto, Z. Hu, A. J¨ uttner, and T. Kaneko, Inclusive semileptonic Ds →X sℓ¯νdecays from lattice QCD: continuum and chiral extrapolation (2026), arXiv:2604.22201 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  47. [47]

    De Santiset al., Inclusive Semileptonic Decays of the Ds Meson: Lattice QCD Confronts Experiments, Phys

    A. De Santiset al., Inclusive Semileptonic Decays of the Ds Meson: Lattice QCD Confronts Experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 121901 (2025), arXiv:2504.06064 [hep- lat]

    arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    De Santiset al., Inclusive semileptonic decays of the Ds meson: A first-principles lattice QCD calculation, Phys

    A. De Santiset al., Inclusive semileptonic decays of the Ds meson: A first-principles lattice QCD calculation, Phys. Rev. D112, 054503 (2025), arXiv:2504.06063 [hep- lat]

    arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Bulava, The spectral reconstruction of inclusive rates, PoSLATTICE2022, 231 (2023), arXiv:2301.04072 [hep-lat]

    J. Bulava, The spectral reconstruction of inclusive rates, PoSLATTICE2022, 231 (2023), arXiv:2301.04072 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    Saccardiet al., transker,https://github.com/ MatteoSaccardi/transker(2026)

    M. Saccardiet al., transker,https://github.com/ MatteoSaccardi/transker(2026)

    2026

  51. [51]

    Bernecker and H

    D. Bernecker and H. B. Meyer, Vector Correlators in Lat- tice QCD: Methods and applications, Eur. Phys. J. A47, 148 (2011), arXiv:1107.4388 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  52. [52]

    Hansen, A

    M. Hansen, A. Lupo, and N. Tantalo, Extraction of spec- tral densities from lattice correlators, Phys. Rev. D99, 094508 (2019), arXiv:1903.06476 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  53. [53]

    Raymond E. A. C. Paley and Wiener Norbert, Fourier Transforms in the Complex Domain, The Mathematical Gazette19, 147 (1934)

    1934

  54. [54]

    Reed and B

    M. Reed and B. Simon,Methods of Modern Mathemati- cal Physics. 2. Fourier Analysis, Self-adjointness, 1st ed., Vol. 2 (Academic Press, 1975)

    1975

  55. [55]

    Tsuji and S

    R. Tsuji and S. Hashimoto, Spectral reconstruction from Euclidean lattice correlators through singular value de- composition (2026), arXiv:2605.15674 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    Backus and F

    G. Backus and F. Gilbert, The Resolving Power of Gross Earth Data, Geophysical Journal International16, 169 (1968)

    1968

  57. [57]

    Lupo and N

    A. Lupo and N. Tantalo, Extraction of spectral densi- ties from lattice correlators: decoupling signal from noise (2026), arXiv:2605.14652 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  58. [58]

    Bruno, L

    M. Bruno, L. Giusti, and M. Saccardi, Spectral densities from Euclidean lattice correlators via the Mellin trans- form, Phys. Rev. D111, 094515 (2025), arXiv:2407.04141 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    C. D. Aliprantis and O. Burkinshaw,Positive Operators, 2nd ed., Springer Monographs in Mathematics (Springer Dordecht, 2006)

    2006

  60. [60]

    Bergamaschi, W

    T. Bergamaschi, W. I. Jay, and P. R. Oare, Hadronic structure, conformal maps, and analytic continuation, Phys. Rev. D108, 074516 (2023), arXiv:2305.16190 [hep- lat]

    arXiv 2023

  61. [61]

    Fields and N

    S. Fields and N. Christ, Nevanlinna-Pick interpolation from uncertain data (2025), arXiv:2510.12136 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    van der Walt, S

    S. van der Walt, S. C. Colbert, and G. Varoquaux, The NumPy Array: A Structure for Efficient Numer- ical Computation, Comput. Sci. Eng.13, 22 (2011), arXiv:1102.1523 [cs.MS]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  63. [63]

    C. R. Harriset al., Array programming with NumPy, Nature585, 357 (2020), arXiv:2006.10256 [cs.MS]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  64. [64]

    The mpmath development team,mpmath: a Python library for arbitrary-precision floating-point arithmetic (version 1.3.0)(2023),http://mpmath.org/

    2023

  65. [65]

    J. D. Hunter, Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment, Computing in Science & Engineering9, 90 (2007)

    2007

  66. [66]

    M. L. Waskom, Seaborn: Statistical Data Visualization, Journal of Open Source Software6, 3021 (2021)

    2021

  67. [67]

    Diamond and S

    S. Diamond and S. Boyd, CVXPY: A Python-embedded modeling language for convex optimization, Journal of Machine Learning Research17, 1 (2016)

    2016

  68. [68]

    Agrawal, R

    A. Agrawal, R. Verschueren, S. Diamond, and S. Boyd, A rewriting system for convex optimization problems, Jour- nal of Control and Decision5, 42 (2018)

    2018