Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 32 references

Quantum Kinetic Modeling of KEEN waves in a Warm-Dense Regime

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Quantum diffraction systematically erodes the trapping mechanism that sustains KEEN waves, damping higher harmonics and hastening their post-drive decay.

desk verdict First Wigner-Poisson simulation of KEEN waves shows a plausible H-dependent trend, but the abstract outruns the evidence and key drive parameters are missing. read the letter →

arxiv 2510.23690 v1 pith:T2CFVQD4 submitted 2025-10-27 physics.plasm-ph

F. Alejandro Padilla-Gomez (1) , Sining Gong (1) , Michael S. Murillo (1) , F. R. Graziani (2) , Andrew J. Christlieb (1) ((1) Michigan State University , Department of Computational Mathematics , Science , Engineering
show 2 more authors
(2) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory High Energy Density Science Center)
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-ph
keywords Wigner-PoissonKEENwavesquantumdiffractionwarmdensematterharmoniclockingLandaudampingtrappedparticlevorticessemi-LagrangianWENO
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper extends the study of KEEN waves — long-lived, multiharmonic electron oscillations that persist after a laser drive is removed — from classical kinetics to the quantum Wigner–Poisson description relevant to warm-dense plasmas. It claims that quantum diffraction, measured by the dimensionless parameter H, weakens the particle-trapping vortices that classically lock harmonics together, narrowing the surviving spectrum toward the driver's fundamental frequency and accelerating the wave's decay once driving stops. If correct, classical Vlasov models would overestimate both the longevity and the harmonic richness of sub-plasma-frequency oscillations in warm-dense and high-energy-density settings, with consequences for laser-plasma coupling, energy transport, and stopping-power modeling. The paper also suggests the late-time plasma density structure could serve as a diagnostic of how quantum the plasma is.

What carries the argument

The central object is the dimensionless Wigner–Poisson system, whose nonlocal Wigner potential operator encodes quantum diffraction through the parameter H = ħ/(m_e λ_D^2 ω_pe) — the ratio of the electron thermal de Broglie wavelength to the Debye length. H is the knob the paper turns, from near zero (classical Vlasov) to O(1) (warm-dense regimes). The solver splits the system into free advection steps handled by a conservative semi-Lagrangian high-order interpolation and a velocity-space Fourier update that solves the nonlocal Wigner term analytically under a frozen-field approximation. Continuous wavelet analysis of the electrostatic energy then diagnoses how the mode content concentrates

What would settle it

A temperature-density scan of driven sub-plasma-frequency oscillations in a warm-dense plasma (or a Wigner–Poisson run with an added collision operator) would settle it: if the higher harmonics persist and decay times do not shorten as H increases, or if collisional damping alone reproduces the trend, the attribution to quantum diffraction fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors report the first fully kinetic quantum study of KEEN waves, using a 1D1V Wigner–Poisson solver. Driving a uniform Maxwellian plasma with a short, frequency-tuned ponderomotive pulse, they find that as the dimensionless quantum parameter H (the ratio of the electron thermal de Broglie wavelength to the Debye length) rises from the classical limit to warm-dense values, the drive threshold increases, higher harmonics are progressively damped (third and fourth harmonics at H=1, second as well by H=8), trapped electron vortices diffuse, and the electrostatic energy relaxes sooner to a lower stationary level. Wavelet analysis confirms the harmonic patch at H=1 contracts to a single rid

Load-bearing premise

The study assumes that in the warm-dense regime, collisions are weak enough that the harmonic damping and faster relaxation come from quantum diffraction rather than from collisional dissipation; the paper itself notes that collisions can mimic a larger H, so if collisions dominate in practice, the quantum fingerprint would not be uniquely attributable.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Classical Vlasov models of driven, warm-dense plasmas will overestimate KEEN-wave longevity and multiharmonic content; kinetic predictions of laser-plasma coupling and energy transport should include quantum diffraction.
  • The late-time plasma density profile is proposed as a 'quantum fingerprint': smaller H leaves more complex density structure, so measuring density structure after the drive could indicate how quantum the plasma is.
  • For H around 1, harmonic locking shifts selectively (with a possible small energy rise), marking a transition regime where partial quantum effects are visible before diffraction dominates.
  • Resonant wave–particle coupling — the width of the resonance, trapping fraction, and the suppression of Landau damping — changes with H, so stopping-power and screening models that assume a near-equilibrium background may need quantum-kinetic corrections.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same diffraction-driven erosion of trapping should apply to other persistent kinetic structures (BGK modes, stimulated electron-acoustic-wave scattering) in warm-dense plasmas, raising their drive thresholds as H grows — a testable prediction for experiments at different densities or temperatures.
  • Editorial inference: because H ∝ √n / T (at fixed composition), a single experiment sweeping temperature at fixed density should show the third harmonic dropping as T falls — a signature that would separate quantum diffraction from collisional damping, which would depend on density differently.
  • Editorial inference: the observed numerical convergence suggests the Wigner–Poisson system has a natural small-length scale set by H, which may mitigate the recurrence problem of classical Vlasov simulations in this regime; if so, quantum kinetic solvers could be numerically more robust for warm-dense kinetics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper studies driven electron plasma waves in the Wigner-Poisson (WP) model with classical ions, using a second-order Strang-split conservative semi-Lagrangian WENO scheme with an analytic Fourier-space update for the Wigner potential. It scans the dimensionless quantum parameter H (0.1 validation, 0.5, 1, 8) under a ponderomotive drive and diagnoses electrostatic energy, electric-field Fourier modes, wavelet spectra, phase-space distributions, and density profiles. The central claim is that increasing quantum diffraction systematically erodes KEEN-wave trapping, narrows harmonic locking to the fundamental, and accelerates post-drive relaxation, so classical Vlasov models overestimate KEEN persistence in warm-dense plasmas.

Significance. If correct, this is the first fully kinetic quantum extension of KEEN-wave physics and is relevant to warm-dense-matter, HED, and ICF applications. Strengths include the parameter-free nature of the H scan (no fitting to the output), a numerical method benchmarked against a classical Vlasov case at H=0.1, and mutually consistent energy, Fourier-mode, and wavelet diagnostics. The main risk is external validity for warm-dense plasmas: the model is collisionless, and Section IV.F concedes that collisions can mimic larger H, so the unique attribution to quantum diffraction is not yet secured. In addition, the numerical resolution used for the H=0.5 production runs appears to contradict the paper's own refinement requirement, weakening the near-classical baseline of the trend.

major comments (3)
  1. [IV.B, IV.C] The manuscript states that "All diagnostics were extracted from a single run... Nx=Nv=4096" but later says "We therefore adopt Nx=Nv=2048 for the production runs reported in the main text." The refinement study explicitly concludes that "at H=0.5 the coarser grid washes out a noticeable amount of structure... a mesh of 4096 points is required for the small-scale quantum ripples to converge." Since H=0.5 is the near-classical baseline used to exhibit the H-trend (Figs. 3 and 5a), the production resolution contradicts the paper's own convergence requirement and can corrupt the case that anchors the classical-like limit. Please rerun H=0.5 at 4096 or remove H=0.5 from quantitative comparisons, and fix the spacing statement: with Nx=4096, Δx=8π/(Nx-1), not 8π/2048.
  2. [IV.F, Abstract] The central claim that "classical kinetic models overestimate KEEN-wave persistence" in warm-dense plasmas rests on a collisionless Wigner-Poisson model, while Section IV.F concedes that "collisions can have a similar effect to larger H." In warm-dense matter electron-ion collisions are typically not negligible; a classical Vlasov-Fokker-Planck model with realistic ν_ei could reproduce the same harmonic suppression and faster post-drive decay without quantum diffraction. To secure the attribution, provide an order-of-magnitude comparison of ν_ei/ω_pe for the target ρ, T conditions, or add a collisional classical run. Without this, the observed trend is not uniquely a quantum 'fingerprint,' and the abstract's statement about real warm-dense plasmas is unsupported.
  3. [IV.C, IV.D] All damping rates, Fourier-mode levels, and wavelet patterns are derived from a single realization, with no error bars, no repeated runs, and no reported conservation or numerical-error diagnostics. This is materially important because the energy-envelope damping is partly sensitive to numerical dissipation, especially at H=0.5 where the production grid is under-resolved. Please quantify convergence for integrated quantities (e.g., compare UE(t) at 2048 versus 4096 for H=0.5 and H=1) and report at least one conservation diagnostic (L1/L2 norm, Poisson residual, or equivalent).
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (2a)] The right-hand side of Eq. (2a) has a '+' sign between Φ(x+x'/2) and Φ(x-x'/2), while Eqs. (4a), (7), and (12) use a '−'. Please check the sign convention and make it consistent.
  2. [Fig. 1] The caption uses a rescaled parameter Hb without defining it in the text. Define b = sqrt(m/m_DT) and state its relation to the H used in the simulations.
  3. [Eq. (16)] Equation (16) is difficult to parse. Please define k_n explicitly and write the mode amplitude in a clearer normalized form; the notation 'lognFM' is also misleading.
  4. [IV.A] The classical-limit validation is only qualitative ('simulates fairly well Vlasov-Poisson'). A quantitative comparison with refs. 40/48—e.g., mode amplitudes or electrostatic energy at t=60—would considerably strengthen the classical-limit claim.
  5. [Fig. 7 caption] The caption says 'For H≈1 we see that we need a a finer mesh...', but the text says that at H=1 the island core and pedestal have already converged at 1024. Please make the caption and text consistent.
  6. [Throughout] There are several typos and duplicated references: 'reveling', 'solds', 'multiharmminc', 'the the smaller H', and references 1/33, 2/34, etc. appear duplicated. Please proofread and renumber.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: H is a scanned control parameter, the Wigner–Poisson system is solved rather than fitted, and the central result is independently anchored.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that increasing the dimensionless quantum parameter H erodes KEEN-wave trapping, narrows harmonic locking, and hastens post-drive decay. The derivation chain is a direct numerical solution of the non-dimensionalized Wigner–Poisson system (Eqs. 4a–4b) over a scanned H. H enters through the model equations and the stated nondimensionalization (Eq. 3), not through any fit to the diagnostics (electrostatic energy, Fourier modes, wavelet spectra); no parameter is calibrated to the target result. The numerical method is substantially drawn from the co-authors' ref. 49, but that is implementation support rather than the physics claim, and the solver is externally anchored: Section IV.A validates against the classical Vlasov-Poisson results of refs. 40 and 48, while Section IV.B provides a refinement study for H=0.5, 1, and 8. The self-citations (refs. 4/36, 42, 49) do not carry the central argument alone, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported as a substitute for the calculation. The paper's own limitation statements are explicit rather than concealed: Section IV.F concedes 'collisions can have a similar effect to larger H,' and Section V flags the H≈1 rise as tentative because H<1 requires finer resolution. These are model-validity and confounding concerns for the warm-dense application, not circularity of the internal derivation. The use of a single production run is a statistical limitation, but it does not make the prediction equivalent to an input. No fitted value is renamed as a prediction, no result is shown to reduce by construction to an assumption, and no known result is merely relabeled. Thus no circular step reaches the evidentiary standard required by the rubric.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted constants; H is scanned as a control parameter. The main hidden inputs are the external drive amplitude, wavenumber, and frequency (k and omega never specified numerically), plus numerical-resolution choices that affect H=0.5 results.

free parameters (3)
  • drive wavenumber k = not stated
    Appears in Eq. (13) for the external drive but its numerical value is never given; KEEN excitation and harmonic content depend on it.
  • drive frequency omega = not stated
    Appears in Eq. (13); it must be tuned between plasma and electron-acoustic frequencies (Section I) but the exact value is omitted, so the H-scan cannot be reproduced.
  • drive amplitude coefficient = 0.4
    Fixed in Eq. (14), not fitted, but the threshold and harmonic response depend on it.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Wigner-Poisson is the appropriate mean-field (Vlasov-level) description of electrons in warm-dense plasmas.
    Section II adopts the Wigner-Poisson system from KTMD (refs. 36,39); this neglects collisions, exchange-correlation, and ionic dynamics.
  • domain assumption The plasma is collisionless on the simulated timescale.
    No collision operator is included; Section IV.F admits collisions can mimic larger H effects.
  • domain assumption Ions form a fixed, classical neutralizing background.
    Only electrons are evolved; ion dynamics are not modeled.
  • domain assumption Boundary and initial conditions: periodic domain x in [0,8pi], v in [-8,8], uniform Maxwellian initial state.
    Eq. (15) and Section IV; results are for this geometry and initial state.
  • domain assumption Frozen-field approximation in the Wigner update is accurate at the chosen time step.
    Step 3, Eq. (10) treats the potential as frozen over dt; no convergence test for this approximation is reported.
  • domain assumption The external potential drive of Eq. (13) excites KEEN waves in the classical limit.
    Validated against classical Vlasov results from refs. 40/48 at H=0.1; exact k/omega values are not stated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum Kinetic Modeling of KEEN waves in a Warm-Dense Regime." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/T2CFVQD4

@misc{pith2026251023690,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum Kinetic Modeling of KEEN waves in a Warm-Dense Regime},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/T2CFVQD4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.23690}
}
read the original abstract

We report a fully kinetic, quantum study of Kinetic Electrostatic Electron Nonlinear (KEEN) waves, showing that quantum diffraction systematically erodes the classical trapping mechanism, narrow harmonic locking to the fundamental, and hasten post-drive decay. Electrons are evolved with a second-order Strang-split 1D1V Wigner-Poisson solver that couples conservative semi-Lagrangian WENO advection to an analytic Fourier space update for the non-local Wigner term, while ions remain classical. Short, frequency-tuned ponderomotive pulses drive KEEN formation in a uniform Maxwellian plasma; as the dimensionless quantum parameter H rises from the classical limit to values relevant to warm-dense matter, doped semiconductors, and 2D electron systems, the drive threshold increases, higher harmonics are damped, trapped electron vortices diffuse, and the subplasma electrostatic energy relaxes to a lower stationary level, as confirmed by continuous wavelet analysis. These microscopic changes carry macroscopic weight. Ignition-scale capsules now compress matter to regimes where the electron de Broglie wavelength rivals the Debye length, making classical kinetic descriptions insufficient. By extending KEEN physics into this quantum domain, our results offer a potential diagnostic of nonequilibrium electron dynamics for next-generation inertial-confinement designs and high-energy-density platforms, indicating that predictive fusion modeling may benefit from the integration of kinetic fidelity with quantum effects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.23690 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Log-scale heatmap of the Warm-Dense parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Phase-spaces of KEEN wave at t=60, showing that [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Electrostatic energy for different values of H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: For [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The first four Fourier modes of the electric field for KEEN waves in Wigner-Poisson are shown above for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Wavelet spectrum of electrostatic energy, for the case H=1, its shown a persistent trapped particle vortex. For the case [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Phase-spaces solutions of the Wigner-Poisson system for KEEN waves at t=120. For [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Plasma densities at four different times for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. M. Marinak, G. B. Zimmerman, T. Chapman, G. D. Kerbel, M. V. Patel, J. M. Koning, S. M. Sepke, B. Chang, C. R. Schroeder, J. A. Harte, et al., ``How numerical simulations helped to achieve breakeven on the NIF,'' Physics of Plasmas 31(7) (2024)

    2024

  2. [2]

    Afeyan, K

    B. Afeyan, K. Won, V. Savchenko, T. W. Johnston, A. Ghizzo, and P. Bertrand, ``Kinetic Electrostatic Electron Nonlinear (KEEN) Waves and their Interactions Driven by the Ponderomotive Force,'' Inertial Fusion Sciences and Applications 2003: State of the Art 2003 (American Nuclear Society, 2004)

    2003

  3. [3]

    T. W. Johnston, Y. Tyshetskiy, A. Ghizzo, and Pierre Bertrand, ``Persistent subplasma-frequency kinetic electrostatic electron nonlinear waves,'' Physics of Plasmas 16(4) (2009)

    2009

  4. [4]

    F. R. Graziani, J. D. Bauer, and M. S. Murillo, ``Kinetic theory molecular dynamics and hot dense matter: Theoretical foundations,'' Phys. Rev. E 90(3), 033104 (2014). doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.90.033104. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.90.033104

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.90.033104 2014

  5. [5]

    Afeyan, K

    B. Afeyan, K. Won, V. Savchenko, Tudor Johnston, Alain Ghizzo, and P. Bertrand, ``Kinetic Electrostatic Electron Nonlinear (KEEN) Waves and their Interactions Driven by the Ponderomotive Force of Crossing Laser Beams,'' (2012)

    2012

  6. [6]

    Bedros Afeyan, Fernando Casas, Nicolas Crouseilles, Adila Dodhy, Erwan Faou, Michel Mehrenberger, and Eric Sonnendr \"u cker, ``Simulations of kinetic electrostatic electron nonlinear (KEEN) waves with variable velocity resolution grids and high-order time-splitting,'' The European Physical Journal D 68, 1--21 (2014)

    2014

  7. [7]

    Haas, Quantum plasmas: an hydrodynamic approach (Springer, New York, 2011)

    F. Haas, Quantum plasmas: an hydrodynamic approach (Springer, New York, 2011). URL: http://www.springer.com/physics/atomic,+molecular,+optical+\

    2011

  8. [8]

    doi:10.1007/s10915-012-9680-x

    Yingda Cheng, Irene Gamba, and Philip Morrison, ``Study of conservation and recurrence of Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin schemes for Vlasov-Poisson systems,'' Journal of Scientific Computing 56 (2012). doi:10.1007/s10915-012-9680-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s10915-012-9680-x 2012

Show all 32 references
  1. [9]

    S. K. Kodanova, T. S. Ramazanov, and M. K. Issanova, ``Demarcating the classical and quantum approaches for the Coulomb logarithm in plasmas,'' arXiv:2408.09293 (2024). URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.09293

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2009.10.016

    Jing-Mei Qiu and Andrew Christlieb, ``A conservative high order semi-Lagrangian WENO method for the Vlasov equation,'' Journal of Computational Physics 229(4), 1130--1149 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2009.10.016. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999109005610

    2010 doi

  3. [11]

    URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2158320

    Anton Arnold and Christian Ringhofer, ``An Operator Splitting Method for the Wigner-Poisson Problem,'' SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 33(4), 1622--1643 (1996). URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2158320

    1996

  4. [12]

    Y. P. Opachich, R. F. Heeter, Heather Marie Johns, Evan S. Dodd, John L. Kline, Natalia Sergeevna Krasheninnikova, D. C. Mayes, M. H. Montgomery, D. E. Winget, Todd James Urbatsch, et al., ``Density measurements for the National Ignition Facility (NIF) opacity platform,'' Revi...

    2022

  5. [13]

    D. S. Montgomery, R. J. Focia, H. A. Rose, D. A. Russell, J. A. Cobble, J. C. Fern \'a ndez, and R. P. Johnson, ``Observation of stimulated electron-acoustic-wave scattering,'' Physical Review Letters 87(15), 155001 (2001)

    2001

  6. [14]

    Bedros Afeyan, K. Won, V. Savchenko, T. Johnston, A. Ghizzo, and P. Bertrand, ``Kinetic electrostatic electron nonlinear (KEEN) waves and their interactions driven by the ponderomotive force of crossing laser beams,'' arXiv:1210.8105 (2012)

    2012 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Taitano, Brett D

    William T. Taitano, Brett D. Keenan, Luis Chacon, Steven E. Anderson, Hans R. Hammer, and Andrei N. Simakov, ``An Eulerian Vlasov-Fokker--Planck algorithm for spherical implosion simulations of inertial confinement fusion capsules,'' Computer Physics Communications 263, 107861 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Feix, and Pierre Bertrand, ``Numerical simulation of the quantum Liouville-Poisson system,'' Journal of Computational Physics 94(2), 403--418 (1991)

    Nam-Duk Suh, Marl R. Feix, and Pierre Bertrand, ``Numerical simulation of the quantum Liouville-Poisson system,'' Journal of Computational Physics 94(2), 403--418 (1991)

    1991

  9. [17]

    URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.21314

    Andrew Christlieb, Sining Gong, Jing-Mei Qiu, and Nanyi Zheng, ``A Sampling-Based Adaptive Rank Approach to the Wigner-Poisson System,'' arXiv:2506.21314 (2025). URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.21314

    2025 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Frensley, ``Wigner-function model of a resonant-tunneling semiconductor device,'' Physical Review B 36(3), 1570 (1987)

    William R. Frensley, ``Wigner-function model of a resonant-tunneling semiconductor device,'' Physical Review B 36(3), 1570 (1987)

    1987

  11. [19]

    Pierre Degond and Peter A. Markowich, ``A quantum-transport model for semiconductors: the Wigner-Poisson problem on a bounded Brillouin zone,'' ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis 24(6), 697--709 (1990)

    1990

  12. [20]

    Markowich, ``The three-dimensional Wigner-Poisson problem: existence, uniqueness and approximation,'' Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences 14(1), 35--61 (1991)

    Franco Brezzi and Peter A. Markowich, ``The three-dimensional Wigner-Poisson problem: existence, uniqueness and approximation,'' Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences 14(1), 35--61 (1991)

    1991

  13. [21]

    Costolanski and C

    Anne S. Costolanski and C. T. Kelley, ``Efficient solution of the Wigner--Poisson equations for modeling resonant tunneling diodes,'' IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology 9(6), 708--715 (2010)

    2010

  14. [22]

    331--363

    Anton Arnold and Ansgar J \"u ngel, ``Multi-scale modeling of quantum semiconductor devices,'' in Analysis, Modeling and Simulation of Multiscale Problems (Springer, 2006), pp. 331--363

    2006

  15. [23]

    Murillo, ``X-ray Thomson scattering in warm dense matter at low frequencies,'' Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 81(3), 036403 (2010)

    Michael S. Murillo, ``X-ray Thomson scattering in warm dense matter at low frequencies,'' Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 81(3), 036403 (2010)

    2010

  16. [24]

    Haines, ``Charged particle transport coefficient challenges in high energy density plasmas,'' Physics of Plasmas 31(5) (2024)

    Brian M. Haines, ``Charged particle transport coefficient challenges in high energy density plasmas,'' Physics of Plasmas 31(5) (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Mannion, William T

    Owen M. Mannion, William T. Taitano, Brian D. Appelbe, Aidan J. Crilly, Chad J. Forrest, V. Yu. Glebov, James P. Knauer, Patrick W. McKenty, Zaarah L. Mohamed, Christian Stoeckl, et al., ``Evidence of non-Maxwellian ion velocity distributions in spherical shock-driven implosio...

    2023

  18. [26]

    Bender, Oleg Schilling, Kumar S

    Jason D. Bender, Oleg Schilling, Kumar S. Raman, Robert A. Managan, Britton J. Olson, Sean R. Copeland, C. Leland Ellison, David J. Erskine, Channing M. Huntington, Brandon E. Morgan, et al., ``Simulation and flow physics of a shocked and reshocked high-energy-density mixing l...

    2021

  19. [27]

    S. H. Glenzer, O. L. Landen, P. Neumayer, R. W. Lee, K. Widmann, S. W. Pollaine, R. J. Wallace, G. Gregori, A. H \"o ll, Th. Bornath, et al., ``Observations of plasmons in warm dense matter,'' Physical Review Letters 98(6), 065002 (2007)

    2007

  20. [28]

    Ajayan, Peter Nordlander, Naomi J

    Zheyu Fang, Sukosin Thongrattanasiri, Andrea Schlather, Zheng Liu, Lulu Ma, Yumin Wang, Pulickel M. Ajayan, Peter Nordlander, Naomi J. Halas, and F. Javier Garc \' a de Abajo, ``Gated tunability and hybridization of localized plasmons in nanostructured graphene,'' ACS Nano 7(3...

    2013

  21. [29]

    Sophia Malko, Witold Cayzac, Valeria Ospina-Bohorquez, Krish Bhutwala, Mathieu Bailly-Grandvaux, Christopher McGuffey, Robert Fedosejevs, Xavier Vaisseau, An Tauschwitz, J. I. Api \ n aniz, et al., ``Proton stopping measurements at low velocity in warm dense carbon,'' Nature C...

    2022

  22. [30]

    Cayzac, A

    W. Cayzac, A. Frank, A. Ortner, V. Bagnoud, M. M. Basko, S. Bedacht, C. Bl \"a ser, A. Bla z evi \'c , S. Busold, O. Deppert, et al., ``Experimental discrimination of ion stopping models near the Bragg peak in highly ionized matter,'' Nature Communications 8(1), 15693 (2017)

    2017

  23. [31]

    Tian-Xing Hu, Jiong-Hang Liang, Zheng-Mao Sheng, and Dong Wu, ``Kinetic investigations of nonlinear electrostatic excitations in quantum plasmas,'' Physical Review E 105(6), 065203 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Tito Mendon c a, ``Landau damping and particle trapping in the quantum regime,'' Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics 7(1), 26 (2023)

    J. Tito Mendon c a, ``Landau damping and particle trapping in the quantum regime,'' Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics 7(1), 26 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.