Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Velocity profiles in strongly turbulent Taylor-Couette flow

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1310.6196 v1 pith:T3TQJ5A6 submitted 2013-10-23 physics.flu-dyn

classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords velocityprofilesprofileangularazimuthalcylinderlargestrongly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We derive the velocity profiles in strongly turbulent Taylor-Couette flow for the general case of independently rotating cylinders. The theory is based on the Navier-Stokes equations in the appropriate (cylinder) geometry. In particular, we derive the axial and the angular velocity profiles as functions of distance from the cylinder walls and find that both follow a logarithmic profile, with downwards-bending curvature corrections, which are more pronounced for the angular velocity profile as compared to the axial velocity profile, and which strongly increase with decreasing ratio $\eta$ between inner and outer cylinder radius. In contrast, the azimuthal velocity does not follow a log-law. We then compare the angular and azimuthal velocity profiles with the recently measured profiles in the ultimate state of (very) large Taylor numbers. Though the {\em qualitative} trends are the same -- down-bending for large wall distances and (properly shifted and non-dimensionalized) angular velocity profile $\omega^+(r)$ being closer to a log-law than (properly shifted and non-dimensionalized) azimuthal velocity profile $u^+_{\varphi}(r)$ -- {\em quantitative} deviations are found for large wall distances. We attribute these differences to the Taylor rolls and the height dependence of the profiles, neither of which are considered in the theoretical approach.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools