Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 35 references

Trace maps on chiral Clifford algebras for the rank two fermionic vertex operator superalgebra

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A trace map on the free-fermion chiral Clifford chain complex is a quasi-isomorphism to the BV zero-mode algebra, intertwines the chiral differential with the BV operator, and reproduces variations of fermionic analytic torsion.

desk verdict Serious, explicitly constructed fermionic analogue of Gui's trace map, but the quasi-isomorphism proof in Lemma 7.7 rests on a false finiteness claim about O_BV and needs a corrected spectral sequence argument. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.02065 v1 pith:T4XEZF5M submitted 2026-08-03 math.FA

A. Zuevsky This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.FA MSC 81T4017B6914D2158J5230F30
keywords chiralalgebrasCliffordvertexoperatorsuperalgebrasBatalin-Vilkoviskyformalismbc-systemsSzegőkernelanalytictorsionquantummasterequation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper constructs a trace map on the chiral homology of the chiral Clifford algebra attached to the purely odd bundle $E = \Pi(F \oplus F^\vee \otimes \omega_X)$ — the algebra of operator-product observables of the rank-two free-fermion (bc) system built from a dual pair of odd fields — and proves that this map lands in the Batalin-Vilkovisky (BV) algebra of harmonic zero modes, satisfies the generalized quantum master equation, and is a quasi-isomorphism. If correct, the chiral homology of the fermionic algebra is computed by ordinary finite zero-mode data, giving the fermionic counterpart of the existing bosonic trace map for symplectic bosons. The paper also shows that applying the map to a deformed current and a deformed stress tensor reproduces, purely algebraically from the chiral chain complex, the classical first-variation formulas for the fermionic analytic torsion (the regularized determinant of the Cauchy-Riemann operator) along the moduli of the bundle and of the curve. A sympathetic reader would care because this puts the bc-ghost system of two-dimensional conformal field theory into a rigorous chain-level algebraic framework tied to analytic torsion.

What carries the argument

The object that carries the construction is the chiral Clifford algebra $\mathcal{C}_E = U(L)^\flat$, the chiral envelope of the purely odd bundle $E = \Pi(F \oplus F^\vee \otimes \omega_X)$; it is the sheaf of operator-product observables of a rank-two free-fermion system with dual fields $\beta_i \in F$ and $\gamma^j \in F^\vee \otimes \omega_X$ satisfying $\beta_i(z)\gamma^j(w) \sim \delta_i^j/(z-w)$. Four mechanisms do the work. First, the fermionic chiral PBW theorem — the statement that the associated graded of $\mathcal{C}_E$ is the exterior algebra $\bigwedge^\bullet L$ of the underlying bundle — lets homological bookkeeping be done on an exterior algebra. Second, the target is the fermionic BV superalgebra $\mathcal{O}_{\mathrm{BV}} = \bigwedge^\bullet H^0(X,E) \otimes \mathrm{Sym}\,H^1(X,E)$ of harmonic zero modes, with the field/antifield parity flip that makes the odd BV operator $\Delta_{\mathrm{BV}}$ square to zero and satisfy the graded Leibniz rule. Third, a fermionic Szegő kernel — the Green's kernel for $\bar\partial$ on the Hermitian bundle — regulates all contractions, and the Pfaffian (alternating) contraction rule encodes fermionic statistics where the permanent encodes bosonic statistics. Fourth, the trace map $\mathrm{Tr}_{\mathrm{ch}}$ sums contractions against a background class $e$, projects to the unit chiral algebra, and integrates; the identity carrying the conclusion is the generalized quantum master equation $(d^{\mathrm{ch}}_{\mathcal{C}_E} + \Delta_{\mathrm{BV}}) \circ \mathrm{Tr}_{\mathrm{ch}} = 0$, which gives the chain-map property and, through a fermion-number filtration, the claimed quasi-isomorphism.

What would settle it

Take $X$ an elliptic curve and $F = \mathcal{O}_X$, so that $E = \Pi(\mathcal{O}_X \oplus \omega_X)$ and $H^0(X,E) \cong H^1(X,E) \cong \mathbb{C}^2$. In the target $\mathcal{O}_{\mathrm{BV}} = \bigwedge^\bullet \mathbb{C}^2 \otimes \mathrm{Sym}\,\mathbb{C}^2$, the powers $(e^1)^m$ of a nonzero class $e^1 \in H^1(X,E)$ occupy fermion-number filtration degree $m$ for arbitrarily large $m$, contradicting Lemma 7.7's assertion that the filtration has finitely many nonzero steps, '$k = 0,\ldots,2r$, on both sides.' Inspecting this filtration in degrees above $2r = 2$ settles the matter: the target filtration never stabilizes, so the spectral-sequence comparison invoked to prove the quasi-isomorphism has no finite first page on the target side.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 7.5: the map $\mathrm{Tr}_{\mathrm{ch}} : (\widetilde{\mathcal{C}}^{\mathrm{ch}}(X,\mathcal{C}_E)_Q, d^{\mathrm{ch}}_{\mathcal{C}_E}) \to (\mathcal{O}_{\mathrm{BV}}, -\Delta_{\mathrm{BV}})$, built from Pfaffian (fermionic Wick) contractions regulated by the fermionic Szegő kernel, intertwines the chiral chain differential with the BV operator, satisfies the generalized quantum master equation $(d^{\mathrm{ch}}_{\mathcal{C}_E} + \Delta_{\mathrm{BV}}) \circ \mathrm{Tr}_{\mathrm{ch}} = 0$, and is a quasi-isomorphism: the chiral homology of $\mathcal{C}_E$ is thereby isomorphic to the zero-mode BV algebra $\mathcal{O}_{\mathrm{BV}} = \bigwedge^\bullet H^0(X,E) \otimes \mathrm{Sym}\,H^1(X,E)$. To get there the paper proves the fermionic chiral PBW theorem (the associated graded of $\mathcal{C}_E$ is the exterior algebra of the underlying bundle), a fermionic Wick theorem organized by Pfaffian contraction operators, existence and uniqueness of the fermionic Szegő kernel, super-cyclicity of the trace pairing, and homotopy uniqueness and metric-independence of $\mathrm{Tr}_{\mathrm{ch}}$. In the applications, $\mathrm{Tr}_{\mathrm{ch}}$ evaluated on a modified affine current and on a modified energy-momentum tensor recovers, by purely algebraic manipulation of the chiral chain complex, the classical first-order variation formulas for the fermionic analytic torsion along the moduli of the bundle $F$ and along the moduli of the curve $X$, with the sign flip relative to the bosonic symplectic-boson theory that the reciprocal relation between Grassmann and Gaussian determinants predicts.

Load-bearing premise

The quasi-isomorphism proof rests on an unproved 'standard' comparison between Dolbeault cohomology and harmonic zero modes, which conflicts with the paper's own definitions whenever $H^1(X,E)$ is nonzero, because the polynomial factor $\mathrm{Sym}\,H^1(X,E)$ then makes the target algebra infinite-dimensional although the paper's standing hypothesis (A5) calls it finite-dimensional.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Corollary 7.8: the chiral homology of the rank-two fermionic chiral Clifford algebra is isomorphic to the cohomology of the zero-mode BV algebra, so the full chiral chain complex collapses to finite zero-mode data after passing to homology.
  • Both the deformation of the holomorphic structure of $F$ and the Beltrami deformation of the curve $X$ give expectation values expressed as integrals of local coefficients of the fermionic Green's kernel, reproducing the classical first-variation formulas for the fermionic analytic torsion from the chiral complex alone.
  • The trace map is canonical up to explicit chain homotopy: it is independent of the Hermitian metric used in its definition, and any two chain maps that solve the generalized quantum master equation and induce the same map on the associated graded are chain homotopic.
  • Every algebraic consistency check required of a BV-quantized system is verified at the chain level: $d^2 = 0$ for each differential introduced, $\Delta_{\mathrm{BV}}^2 = 0$, the graded Leibniz rule for the induced bracket, and super-cyclicity of the trace pairing.
  • The fermionic expectation value of the deformed current is the negative of the symplectic-boson expectation value, reflecting the reciprocal relation between the Grassmann determinant and the Gaussian inverse determinant of the same Cauchy-Riemann operator.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same construction should specialize to the self-dual rank-one free fermion attached to a spin structure $\omega_X^{1/2}$, where no doubled pair of fields is needed; the paper identifies this case as open, and there the harmonic spaces would carry a symmetric rather than a dual-pair pairing.
  • If the filtration argument is repaired, the natural next step is the family version: evaluate $\mathrm{Tr}_{\mathrm{ch}}$ over moduli spaces where $H^0$ and $H^1$ jump in dimension, where the naive determinant vanishes and the zeta-regularized (Quillen-metric) framing becomes essential; the paper gestures at this in a remark but does not carry it out.
  • The fermionic/bosonic sign flip suggests that a single interpolating 'super chiral Weyl-Clifford algebra,' whose pairing runs between symmetric and antisymmetric, could realize both trace maps through one common resolution; the paper lists this as future work.
  • Iterated insertions of the deformed current and stress tensor should reproduce the higher-order variations of the analytic torsion obtained by sewing or plumbing Riemann surfaces, giving a purely algebraic route to higher moduli derivatives that the paper does not compute.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper develops a fermionic analogue of Gui's trace map on chiral Weyl algebras. For a holomorphic vector bundle F on a smooth Riemann surface X, it considers the purely odd bundle E = Π(F ⊕ F^∨ ⊗ ω_X), constructs the associated chiral Clifford algebra C_E, and identifies it with the chiral algebra of a rank-two fermionic vertex operator superalgebra bundle (Theorem 4.3). It then defines a BV superalgebra O_BV built from harmonic zero modes (Definition 5.2, Proposition 5.5), constructs a trace map Tr_ch from the chiral chain complex to O_BV via Pfaffian contractions regulated by a fermionic Szegő kernel, and claims that Tr_ch is a chain map, satisfies the generalized quantum master equation, and is a quasi-isomorphism (Theorem 7.5). In Section 8, the trace map is evaluated on a modified affine current and a modified energy-momentum tensor, and the results are connected to Fay's formulas for the variation of fermionic analytic torsion.

Significance. If the quasi-isomorphism in Theorem 7.5 is correct, the paper provides a substantial fermionic counterpart of Gui's chiral HKR-type trace map, with the chiral homology of the chiral Clifford algebra computed by a zero-mode BV algebra. The paper has genuine strengths: it tracks Koszul signs in detail, proves the fermionic chiral PBW theorem, verifies Δ_BV^2 = 0 with an explicit field/antifield parity argument, supplies a Pfaffian Wick theorem, and works out concrete examples at genus zero. The applications to current and stress-tensor insertions are natural and would be valuable if the supporting identification with analytic torsion were made rigorous. However, as explained below, the proof of the central quasi-isomorphism statement has a load-bearing gap in the nonzero H^1 case, and the analytic-torsion applications are presented with a heuristic identification that the text itself acknowledges.

major comments (4)
  1. [§5.4 (A5) and Definition 5.2] Hypothesis (A5) asserts that O_BV is finite-dimensional, citing Theorem 3.11 and §5.1. This is contradicted by Definition 5.2, where O_BV = V•H^0(X,E) ⊗_C Sym H^1(X,E). Whenever H^1(X,E) is nonzero, Sym H^1 is an infinite-dimensional polynomial algebra, so (A5) is false in the generality in which Theorem 7.5 is stated. Remark 5.3 explicitly allows n = dim H^0 = dim H^1 > 0, so the contradiction is internal rather than merely a restrictive assumption. Consequently, the finiteness of the fermion-number filtration claimed in Lemma 7.7 is not available on the target side.
  2. [Lemma 7.7] The quasi-isomorphism proof asserts that the associated graded of Tr_ch under the fermion-number filtration is the harmonic projection from V•L to V•H^0(X,E) ⊗ Sym H^1(X,E), and that this induces a quasi-isomorphism by a standard Dolbeault/de Rham comparison. This comparison is not demonstrated. Moreover, because Sym H^1 has unbounded polynomial degree, the filtration on O_BV has infinitely many nonzero graded pieces when H^1(X,E) is nonzero. The finite-filtration spectral sequence argument quoted from [16] and [17] therefore does not apply as written, and no separate convergence argument for the unbounded filtration is supplied. Since Lemma 7.7 is the entire proof of the quasi-isomorphism part of Theorem 7.5, the central claim is not established for arbitrary compact X and F.
  3. [Theorem 6.6 and Proposition 6.9] Theorem 6.6, the global intertwining property of W^{τ_z}_U, is stated with its proof omitted as 'identical in structure' to [16, Thm. 5.7]. Proposition 6.9 then uses this theorem to define W^v and hence Tr_ch, so the construction of the trace map itself rests on an unverified central statement. Because the Clifford setting changes the relevant combinatorics from permanents to Pfaffians and introduces Koszul signs at every transposition, a genuine verification or a precise reduction explaining why every step of [16, Thm. 5.7] survives the parity change is needed; an appeal to line-by-line identity is not sufficient for a load-bearing step.
  4. [§8.2, Remark 8.5, and Corollary 8.10] The paper advertises a purely algebraic recovery of Fay's formulas for the variation of fermionic analytic torsion. However, the identification of Tr_ch(J_ν) with the variation of log Z_ferm for Z_ferm = det ∂bar is assumed as a physics input in Remark 8.5, and Corollary 8.10 explicitly states that the sign comparison with the symplectic-boson formula is a path-integral heuristic rather than a chiral-algebraic proof, with a further acknowledgment in §9.2. Thus Section 8 computes the trace-map expectation value of J_ν but does not independently derive the torsion variation formulas from the chiral chain complex. The claim of a purely algebraic recovery should be weakened or supported by a rigorous comparison with the determinant-line construction.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Before Lemma 3.12] The text reads 'Les us discuss compatibility of Clifford multiplication with the grading'; 'Les' should be 'Let'.
  2. [§9.3] The sentence 'The results of this paper is also useful in other areas of mathematical physics...' has a subject-verb agreement error and would read better as 'The results of this paper are also useful...'.
  3. [Corollary 8.10] Because the proof of Corollary 8.10 is explicitly heuristic and is later described in §9.2 as a remark rather than a theorem, the statement should be re-labeled as a remark or conjecture, or supplied with a proof.
  4. [Theorem 8.3] The normalization factor 1/π in Theorem 8.3 is asserted without derivation; since the trace map tr_ω is described abstractly in Definition 7.1, a short explanation of how this normalization is fixed would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the trace-map construction is self-contained, and the flagged analytic-torsion and quasi-isomorphism concerns are correctness gaps, not reductions of the claimed results to their own inputs.

full rationale

The core construction of Tr_ch is not circular: the target (O_BV, Delta_BV) is defined in Section 5 from harmonic cohomology and the parity flip forced by Lemma 5.1; the trace map is defined in Section 7 by Szego-kernel-regulated Pfaffian contractions; and the chain-map/QME identity in Lemma 7.6 is proved from the Lie*-level identity Theorem 7.3, which uses the reproducing property of the Szego kernel (7.1). No parameter is fitted to the quasi-isomorphism target, and the main theorem does not assume the classical torsion formulas it later compares with. The applications in Section 8 compute Tr_ch(J_nu) and Tr_ch(eT_mu) from the same definitions, then compare with Fay's formulas; even though the identification with analytic-torsion variation in Remark 8.5 and the sign flip in Corollary 8.10 rely on path-integral/determinant heuristics, the paper explicitly labels Corollary 8.10 a remark rather than a theorem, so this is not a hidden circular input. I also flag a genuine proof gap, not a circularity: Lemma 7.7 claims the fermion-number filtration is finite using hypothesis (A5), but Definition 5.2 makes O_BV = wedge^bullet H^0(X,E) tensor Sym H^1(X,E), which is infinite-dimensional whenever n = dim H^1(X,E) > 0; the finite-filtration spectral-sequence argument is therefore unsupported as written. This affects correctness of the quasi-isomorphism proof, not the logical circularity of the derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numerical free parameters are fitted anywhere in the paper; the auxiliary Hermitian metric, the metric on the spin bundle, and the projective connection are choices shown to drop out up to chain homotopy or to be irrelevant to the final global sections. The main unstated reliance is on Gui's bosonic framework and on a physics heuristic connecting the trace map to determinants, which is the most circular element.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Standard elliptic Hodge theory for the Cauchy-Riemann operator on compact Riemann surfaces, including harmonic representatives, the Green's operator, and the existence and uniqueness of the fermionic Szegő kernel with the prescribed pole.
    Used in Section 5.1 and Theorem 6.1 to define H^0, H^1, and the Szegő kernel P on which the trace map formula depends.
  • domain assumption The analytic-category nuclear Fréchet framework of Beilinson-Drinfeld and Gui, including closedness of vacuum-module ideals and convergence of chiral envelope quotients.
    Invoked in Section 2.3, Remark 3.7, and Appendix A to justify the PBW filtration; no independent verification is given.
  • domain assumption Gui's bosonic trace map and chiral Weyl algebra results [16] are valid and transfer to the super setting in the manner claimed.
    Theorem 6.6 and parts of Lemma 7.7 and Proposition 8.2 are justified by reference to [16] without reproducing the argument.
  • standard math A projective connection exists on any Riemann surface and fixes the Virasoro-twisted vertex bundle gluing.
    Used in Remark B.1 and Appendix B for the vertex superalgebra bundle; stated as a standard fact without proof.
  • ad hoc to paper The physics identification Z_ferm = det of the Cauchy-Riemann operator, linking the trace-map expectation value to the variation of fermionic Ray-Singer analytic torsion.
    Used in Remark 8.5 and Corollary 8.10 to claim recovery of Fay's formulas; the paper itself calls Corollary 8.10 a path-integral heuristic rather than an algebraic theorem.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Trace maps on chiral Clifford algebras for the rank two fermionic vertex operator superalgebra." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/T4XEZF5M

@misc{pith2026260802065,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Trace maps on chiral Clifford algebras for the rank two fermionic vertex operator superalgebra},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/T4XEZF5M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.02065}
}
abstract

For a holomorphic vector bundle $F$ of rank $r$ on a smooth Riemann surface $X$ we construct a trace map on the chiral homology of the chiral Clifford algebra $\CE$ attached to the purely odd bundle $E=\Pi(F\oplus F^\vee\otimes\omega_X)$. It is the chiral-algebraic realization of the rank two fermionic vertex operator superalgebra. The free-fermion (bc-type) conformal field theory built from a dual pair of odd fields $ \beta_i\in F$, $\gamma^j\in F^\vee\otimes\omega_X$. We give a complete construction of this vertex operator superalgebra, its associated vertex superalgebra bundle, and the isomorphism between the latter's chiral algebra and the chiral envelope $\CE$. Using the Batalin-Vilkovisky (BV) formalism together with Feynman diagrams we prove that the resulting trace map \[ \Trch : \bigl(\widetilde\sC^{\ch}(X,\CE)_{\sQ},\, \dch_{\CE}\bigr)\longrightarrow (\OBV,-\DBV) \] is a chain map satisfying a generalized quantum master equation and is a quasi-isomorphism, generalizing to the odd/Clifford setting the trace map on chiral Weyl algebras constructed by Gui for symplectic bosons. We establish existence, homotopy uniqueness, and functoriality (including explicit metric-independence up to chain homotopy) of the trace map, prove cyclicity of the relevant supertrace, and verify nilpotency of $\DBV$, the graded Leibniz rule, $d^2=0$ for every differential introduced. As an application we compute the trace map on a modified affine current and on a modified energy-momentum tensor, recovering, purely algebraically from the chiral chain complex, Fay's classical formulas for the variation of the fermionic (Ray-Singer) analytic torsion along the moduli of the bundle $F$ and along the moduli of the curve $X$.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [16]

    Gui,Trace map on chiral Weyl algebras, Comm

    Z. Gui,Trace map on chiral Weyl algebras, Comm. Math. Phys.407(2026), article 153; arXiv:2310.15086

    arXiv 2026

  2. [17]

    Z. Gui, S. Li,Elliptic trace map on chiral algebras, arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.14572 (2021)

    arXiv 2021

  3. [1]

    Alvarez-Gaum´ e, G

    L. Alvarez-Gaum´ e, G. Moore, C. Vafa,Theta functions, modular invariance, and strings, Comm. Math. Phys.106(1986), 1-40

    work page 1986

  4. [2]

    Bakker, A

    B. Bakker, A. Veselov, M. Zubkov. Central dominance and the confinement mechanism in gluodynamics. Physics Letters B 471, 214 (1999)

    work page 1999

  5. [3]

    Batalin, G

    I. Batalin, G. Vilkovisky,Gauge algebra and quantization, Phys. Lett. B102(1981), no. 1, 27-31

    work page 1981

  6. [4]

    Beilinson, V

    A. Beilinson, V. Drinfeld,Chiral Algebras, American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, vol. 51, American Mathematical Society, 2004

    work page 2004

  7. [5]

    Bismut, D

    J.-M. Bismut, D. Freed,The analysis of elliptic families I: Metrics and connections on determinant bundles, Comm. Math. Phys.106(1986), 159-176

    work page 1986

  8. [6]

    M. N. Chernodub, M. Zubkov. Scale magnetic effect in quantum electrodynamics and the wigner-weyl formalism. Physical Review D 96, 056006 (2017)

    work page 2017

Show all 35 references
  1. [7]

    Costello, O

    K. Costello, O. Gwilliam,Factorization Algebras in Quantum Field Theory, vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, 2021

    2021

  2. [8]

    Costello,A geometric construction of the Witten genus, I, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians 2010, World Scientific, 2010, pp

    K. Costello,A geometric construction of the Witten genus, I, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians 2010, World Scientific, 2010, pp. 942-959. 38 A. ZUEVSKY

    2010

  3. [9]

    Costello,A geometric construction of the Witten genus, II, arXiv preprint arXiv:1112.0816

    K. Costello,A geometric construction of the Witten genus, II, arXiv preprint arXiv:1112.0816

    arXiv

  4. [10]

    D’Hoker, D

    E. D’Hoker, D. H. Phong,The geometry of string perturbation theory, Rev. Mod. Phys.60(1988), 917-1065

    1988

  5. [11]

    Frenkel, D

    E. Frenkel, D. Ben-Zvi,Vertex Algebras and Algebraic Curves, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, no. 88, American Mathematical Society, 2004

    2004

  6. [12]

    Friedan, E

    D. Friedan, E. Martinec, S. Shenker,Conformal invariance, supersymmetry and string theory, Nucl. Phys. B271(1986), 93-165

    1986

  7. [13]

    J. D. Fay,Kernel Functions, Analytic Torsion, and Moduli Spaces, Memoirs of the American Mathe- matical Society, no. 464, American Mathematical Society, 1992

    1992

  8. [14]

    Fr¨ ohlich, J

    J. Fr¨ ohlich, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, C. Schweigert,Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress on Mathematical Physics (2010) 608-613

    2010

  9. [15]

    Griffiths, J

    P. Griffiths, J. Harris,Principles of Algebraic Geometry, Wiley, 1978

    1978

  10. [18]

    Kovyrshin, A

    G. Kovyrshin, A. Mekrami, J. Miller, M. A. Zubkov and A. Zuevsky, Topological invariant responsible for the integer QHE and noncommutative geometry, arXiv:2606.08868, preprint IM CAS No. IM-2026- 19, 1-53 2026

    2026 arXiv

  11. [19]

    H. B. Lawson, M.-L. Michelsohn,Spin Geometry, Princeton Mathematical Series, no. 38, Princeton University Press, 1989

    1989

  12. [20]

    Quillen,Determinants of Cauchy-Riemann operators over a Riemann surface, Funct

    D. Quillen,Determinants of Cauchy-Riemann operators over a Riemann surface, Funct. Anal. Appl. 19(1985), 31-34

    1985

  13. [21]

    D. B. Ray, I. M. Singer,Analytic torsion for complex manifolds, Ann. of Math.98(1973), 154-177

    1973

  14. [22]

    Razumov, M.V

    A.V. Razumov, M.V. Saveliev, A.B. Zuevsky. Nonabelian Toda equations associated with classical Lie groups. arXiv:math-ph/9909008

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    G. E. Volovik and M. Zubkov. Nambu sum rule in the njl models: from superfluidity to top quark condensation. JETP letters 97, 301 (2013)

    2013

  16. [24]

    G. E. Volovik and M. A. Zubkov. Standard model as the topological material, New Journal of Physics 19 (1), 015009 (2017)

    2017

  17. [25]

    R. O. Wells,Differential Analysis on Complex Manifolds, 3rd ed., Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 65, Springer, 2008

    2008

  18. [26]

    Witten,Elliptic genera and quantum field theory, Comm

    E. Witten,Elliptic genera and quantum field theory, Comm. Math. Phys.109(1987), no. 4, 525-536

    1987

  19. [27]

    C. X. Zhang and M. A. Zubkov, Influence of interactions on the anomalous quantum Hall effect,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical53(2021), 195002

    2021

  20. [28]

    M. Zubkov. Momentum space topology of qcd, Annals of Physics 393, 264 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    M. A. Zubkov, R. A. Abramchuk. Effect of interactions on the topological expression for the chiral separation effect. Physical Review D 107, 094021 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Zubkov, G

    M. Zubkov, G. Volovik. Momentum space topological invariants for the 4d relativistic vacua with mass gap. Nuclear Physics B 860, 295 (2012)

    2012

  23. [31]

    Zhang, M

    C. Zhang, M. Zubkov. Hall conductivity as the topological invariant in the phase space in the presence of interactions and a nonuniform magnetic field. JETP letters 110, 487 (2019)

    2019

  24. [32]

    Zuevsky, On a category ofV-structures for foliations,Reviews in Mathematical Physics36(4) (2024), 2430004

    A. Zuevsky, On a category ofV-structures for foliations,Reviews in Mathematical Physics36(4) (2024), 2430004

    2024

  25. [33]

    Zuevsky, Reduction cohomology of Riemann surfaces,Reviews in Mathematical Physics35(2023), 2330005

    A. Zuevsky, Reduction cohomology of Riemann surfaces,Reviews in Mathematical Physics35(2023), 2330005

    2023

  26. [34]

    Zuevsky, Characterization of codimension one foliations on complex curves by connections,Reviews in Mathematical Physics34(2022), 2230002

    A. Zuevsky, Characterization of codimension one foliations on complex curves by connections,Reviews in Mathematical Physics34(2022), 2230002

    2022

  27. [35]

    Zuevsky, Cosimplicial meromorphic functions cohomology on complex manifolds,Reviews in Math- ematical Physics35(5) (2023), 2330002

    A. Zuevsky, Cosimplicial meromorphic functions cohomology on complex manifolds,Reviews in Math- ematical Physics35(5) (2023), 2330002. Institute of Mathematics, Czech Academy of Sciences, ˇZitn´a 25, 115 67 Praha 1, Czech Republic Email address:zuevsky@yahoo.com

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.