The Promise of Spiking Neural Networks for Ubiquitous Computing: A Survey and New Perspectives

Archan Misra; Archit Mukherjee; Arpan Pal; Dong Ma; Hemanth Sabbella; Sounak Dey; Thivya Kandappu

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 239 references

The Promise of Spiking Neural Networks for Ubiquitous Computing: A Survey and New Perspectives

T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that spiking neural networks, which compute with sparse binary spikes and carry temporal memory in their membrane potentials, are a promising, underused alternative for energy-efficient, real-time processing of…

desk verdict A useful but uneven survey: the taxonomy and toolchain review are genuinely helpful, but the corpus selection and unverifiable Figure 1 power claim weaken the central 'promise' narrative. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.01737 v1 pith:TBFK7AJF submitted 2025-06-02 cs.NE eess.SP

Hemanth Sabbella , Archit Mukherjee , Thivya Kandappu , Sounak Dey , Arpan Pal , Archan Misra , Dong Ma This is my paper

classification cs.NEeess.SP

keywords SpikingNeuralNetworksUbiquitousComputingTime-seriesSignalsNeuromorphicHardwareEnergyEfficiencySensorDataSurveyEncodingSchemes

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's central claim is that spiking neural networks (SNNs) are a promising, under-adopted alternative to conventional artificial neural networks for the time-series sensing tasks that dominate ubiquitous computing, because their event-driven computation and internal temporal memory avoid the redundant, window-based processing of standard deep models. To back this claim, the authors survey 76 peer-reviewed studies across six application domains—human activity recognition, heart monitoring, audio classification, emotion recognition, gesture recognition, and touch classification—and organize each study by neuron model, spike encoding, training strategy, dataset, and accuracy. The recurring pattern they report is that SNNs match or exceed ANN accuracy on many benchmark tasks while consuming one to three orders of magnitude less energy per inference when run on neuromorphic hardware. The paper also reviews current software frameworks and neuromorphic chips, offers tool-selection guidance, and lays out research directions such as streaming (window-free) inference, multimodal fusion, early-response training, and hardware-aware compression. If the survey's picture is right, a reader leaves with a concrete map of where SNNs already work and what must be solved before they become the default for always-on, battery-constrained sensing.

What carries the argument

The central object is the spiking neural network itself, defined by three components: a spiking neuron model (most commonly the Leaky Integrate-and-Fire neuron, whose membrane potential integrates input over time, leaks toward rest, and fires a binary spike when a threshold is crossed), an encoding scheme that turns continuous sensor values into spike trains (rate, temporal, delta, level-crossing, or direct encoding), and a training strategy that handles the non-differentiable spike function (STDP, SpikeProp, BPTT with surrogate gradients, SLAYER, STBP, SSTDP, or ANN-to-SNN conversion). The survey uses this three-part decomposition as its lens for organizing the 76 studies: each application is summarized by which encoding and training route was taken, and the recurring result is that the encoding choice, not just the network size, determines accuracy and energy. The taxonomy of six application domains and the software and hardware decision tables are the survey's operative instruments for turning that lens into practical guidance.

What would settle it

A controlled, published benchmark that runs the same six families of time-series tasks on the same edge hardware—measuring end-to-end power including analog-to-spike encoding, inference, and memory—would settle the claim; if SNNs do not beat equally accurate ANN baselines on energy for the majority of tasks, the survey's central promise fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core claim is that spiking neural networks, precisely because of the properties that make them harder to train than ANNs—binary spike communication, non-differentiable dynamics, and a membrane potential that accumulates information over time—are the right computational model for time-series data on resource-constrained ubiquitous devices. The survey argues that spikes are one-bit events, so computation happens only when input crosses a threshold; the membrane potential gives the network a form of memory that captures temporal context without recurrent layers or sliding windows; and the resulting sparsity translates directly into energy savings. Across the 76 reviewed studies, the authors find SNNs achieving competitive or better accuracy than ANN baselines in most domains—for example, 98.29% accuracy at 0.031 μJ per classification on MIT-BIH ECG, 99.5% on WISDM activity data, and 94.58% on radar gesture recognition—while reporting power reductions of 10× to 1900× on neuromorphic platforms. The authors also claim that no previous SNN survey has centered on time-series data and the ubiquitous-computing perspective, which is the gap this paper fills, and they identify the open engineering problems—standardized spike encoding, streaming processing, hardware portability, and SNN-specific compression—as the field's true bottlenecks.

Load-bearing premise

The survey's conclusions rest on the assumption that the 76 papers it selected—filtered by relevance, venue prestige, and citation count—are representative of the broader SNN-for-time-series literature; if that corpus skews toward favorable results, the central 'SNNs are promising' conclusion weakens.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

SNNs can match or exceed ANN accuracy on many time-series benchmarks, such as above 95% on UCI-HAR and HHAR activity data and above 98% on MIT-BIH ECG, while cutting per-inference energy on neuromorphic hardware by one to three orders of magnitude.
Choosing the right spike encoding is a first-order design decision: delta and multi-threshold delta encodings are reported as especially effective for IMU-based activity and gesture data, level-crossing sampling for heart signals, and rate or direct encoding for audio and EEG.
ANN-to-SNN conversion is the fastest route to deployment but sacrifices temporal dynamics and energy efficiency unless followed by fine-tuning, whereas directly trained SNNs using BPTT and surrogate gradients retain the temporal advantage.
For time-series edge deployment, application-specific software and hardware pairings, such as Rockpool with Xylo and DYNAP-SE2 or Lava with Loihi 2, are recommended over general-purpose simulators that do not port cleanly to neuromorphic chips.
Future work should move from sliding-window processing to streaming per-sample inference, develop multimodal SNN fusion, and design encoding schemes and front-end hardware that capture entropy, phase, or correlation directly in spike streams.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A fair end-to-end energy comparison would need to count the analog-to-spike conversion stage, which many surveyed papers omit from their per-inference figures; if included, it would likely narrow, though probably not erase, the reported SNN energy advantage.
Because the corpus was filtered by relevance, venue prestige, and citation count without a documented screening log, the 'promising' conclusion could be tested by re-running a broader, protocol-registered version of the same search to see whether the favorable pattern survives.
The survey's observation that encoding choice often matters more than architecture suggests a concrete benchmark: fix one SNN architecture and one dataset, sweep the five encoding families on the same hardware, and report accuracy and measured energy jointly.
The proposed streaming, window-free paradigm becomes directly testable with event-based sensors that already emit spikes, such as event cameras or spike-encoding audio front-ends, which sidestep the encoding bottleneck and put the SNN's temporal-memory advantage on display.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this survey is worth engaging, but not as a neutral map. It is a useful organizer of 76 papers on SNNs for time-series ubiquitous sensing, with a clear six-domain taxonomy and a genuinely current software/hardware review. If you work in mobile sensing and want to know what SNNs offer, this is a reasonable entry point.

What's actually new: the time-series-focused framing, the taxonomy (HAR, heart, audio, emotion, gesture, touch), and the toolchain comparison (Table 8, Figure 10) are more current than prior surveys. Table 1's comparison of eight earlier surveys helps position the contribution. The domain summaries are mostly consistent with the cited literature, as far as I can tell, and the practical guidance (e.g., Rockpool for Xylo, SpikingJelly for general development) is concrete.

Soft spots, in rough order of severity. First, the Section 2.2 inclusion criterion requires papers to 'focus on low-power, real-time implementations aligned with ubiquitous computing principles.' That selects on the dependent variable. The survey's 'SNNs are promising for energy-efficient sensing' conclusion is therefore partly guaranteed by how the corpus was built. The authors don't report how many of the 166 initial papers were excluded, nor whether any excluded paper reported unfavorable energy trade-offs. This should be stated as a limitation, and if possible the authors should say something about excluded papers.

Second, Figure 1 claims a 71x power reduction for SNN vs ANN fall detection, but gives no experimental setup, no dataset, no measurement conditions, and no citation. As written it's an unverifiable self-reported number, and it's used to motivate the whole paper. It should either be backed by a reproducible experiment or removed.

Third, some energy comparisons in Section 4 compare SNN-on-neuromorphic-chip vs ANN-on-GPU/CPU (e.g., Blouw 110x on Loihi vs GPU; Taunyazov 1900x). These confound the spiking algorithm with the hardware platform. The survey doesn't flag this, which overstates what the SNN paradigm alone buys on typical embedded devices.

Fourth, table errors: Dong et al. [63] shows 3.8% on TIMIT, but the text says 93.8%. There are also typos (e.g., 'possion' in Table 6). These are minor but undermine confidence in transcription. I'd want the tables rechecked against every source.

Overall: the central argument is plausible but the evidence base is softer than the text suggests. This paper is for newcomers to SNNs in ubiquitous computing, and for researchers looking for a starting bibliography. It deserves a serious referee; the main revision should address corpus transparency, the Figure 1 claim, and the hardware confound.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. This survey paper aims to introduce spiking neural networks (SNNs) to the ubiquitous computing community, focusing on time-series sensor data. It reviews 76 SNN-based studies across six application domains (human activity recognition, heart activity monitoring, audio classification, emotion recognition, gesture recognition, and touch classification), summarizes SNN neuron models, encoding schemes, and training methods, and provides a comparative review of software frameworks and neuromorphic hardware platforms. The paper's central claim is that SNNs, through sparse event-driven computation and temporal dynamics, are a promising and under-adopted alternative to conventional ANNs for energy-efficient ubiquitous sensing, and it closes with future research directions including streaming processing, multi-modal SNNs, and middleware development.

Significance. If its claims hold, the paper provides a useful map of the SNN-for-time-series literature and actionable guidance for choosing development tools. Its strengths are a clear application taxonomy, a broad and mostly consistent synthesis of domain-specific results, current software/hardware comparisons with concrete recommendations, and a readable introduction to SNN fundamentals for a non-specialist audience. The paper does not ship machine-checked proofs or code; its main contribution is synthesis. However, the central energy-efficiency narrative rests on corpus construction rules that select for low-power papers and on self-reported or hardware-confounded comparisons, so the paper's significance is conditional on the authors making the evidence base transparent and separating algorithm-level from system-level claims.

major comments (5)

[Section 2.2, filtering criterion (1)] The first inclusion criterion requires that papers 'had to focus on low-power, real-time implementations aligned with ubiquitous computing principles.' This selects on the dependent variable: a paper applying an SNN to a ubiquitous time-series task but reporting poor energy efficiency or no energy focus would be excluded, making the survey's conclusion that SNNs enable energy-efficient ubiquitous sensing partly guaranteed by the corpus construction rule. The authors should report how many candidate papers were excluded by this criterion and include, or explicitly discuss, papers with unfavorable or null energy trade-offs, or alternatively reframe the survey as a review of the design space rather than as evidence of superiority.
[Introduction, Figure 1] The claim of a '71× reduction' in power for fall detection is presented as an experimental finding of the authors, but no experimental protocol, dataset, hardware versions, measurement methodology, or confidence bounds are provided, and no peer-reviewed citation is given for this measurement. Since Figure 1 motivates the paper's central promise of SNN energy efficiency, a survey should not rest its headline claim on an unreported self-measurement; the authors should either remove this figure or replace it with a reproducible, externally citable comparison.
[Sections 4.4.1 and 4.7.5 (also 4.2.2)] Several headline energy-efficiency numbers confound the SNN algorithm with the neuromorphic hardware platform. Section 4.4.1 reports Blouw et al.'s 110× reduction on Loihi versus a GPU, Section 4.7.5 reports Taunyazov et al.'s 1,900× reduction on Loihi versus a GPU, and Section 4.2.2 cites a 94% energy reduction from an ANN-to-SNN conversion evaluated with a simulator. These comparisons do not establish that the spiking paradigm itself is more efficient than a matched ANN baseline on the same hardware; the text should explicitly flag this confound and, where possible, require matched-baseline or same-platform comparisons before attributing gains to spike-based computation.
[Table 4, Dong et al. [63] row] Table 4 reports a TIMIT accuracy of 3.8% for Dong et al., while Section 4.4.2 states that the same work reports 'accuracies of 97.5% and 93.8% on TIDIGITS and TIMIT, respectively.' One of these is a typographical error, but as published the inconsistency is load-bearing because the survey's credibility depends on accurate reporting of the summarized studies. The authors must verify the source and correct the table or the text.
[Section 2.2, reproducibility of corpus selection] The filtering process is described only qualitatively: there is no screening log, no count of papers excluded at each step, no operational definition of 'high-impact venues' or 'significant citation count,' and no record of disagreements resolved under the 'four-eyed principle.' The reader cannot reconstruct the corpus or assess whether the 76 papers are representative. The authors should add a PRISMA-style flow diagram or an equivalent reproducible protocol with inclusion/exclusion counts, and define the quality thresholds explicitly.

minor comments (6)

[Section 5.1(2)] The software is referred to as 'Brain2' in the main text but as 'Brian2' in the reference and table; the correct name is Brian2.
[Section 5.1(3)] The phrase 'indluding' appears in Section 3.4.1 and 'Comversion' appears in Section 5.1(3); both are typos that should be corrected in proof.
[Table 8] Table 8 contains spelling errors such as 'Possion' for Poisson, 'Hodgin-Huxley' for Hodgkin-Huxley, and 'Gradient-decent' for gradient descent; these should be corrected.
[Table 1 and references] There are inconsistent author-name renderings across the text and tables: 'Bouveir et al.' versus reference [35] Bouvier et al., 'Manon et al.' versus reference [49] Dampfhoffer et al., 'Catherine et al.' versus reference [173] Schuman et al., and 'Alzhrani et al.' in Table 5 versus 'Alzahrani et al.' in the text. These should be harmonized.
[Reference list] Reference [1] appears as '2022. 7. Sub-mW Neuromorphic SNN Audio Processing Applications with Rockpool and Xylo. 69–78,' which is malformed, and reference [2] lacks author and year information; the bibliography needs a full editorial pass.
[Figures 1 and 10] Figure 1 has no labeled axes or units, and Figure 10 contains the typo '≤ 1, mW' with a misplaced comma; both should be clarified for a survey aimed at a broad community.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant derivation-level circularity; self-citations and the self-reported Figure 1 measurement are minor credibility caveats, not circular inputs.

full rationale

This is a survey, not a derivation, so there is no equation-level chain in which a prediction reduces to a fitted input. The abstract's claim that SNNs are a promising route to energy-efficient ubiquitous sensing is a synthesis of the 76 surveyed papers; the reported accuracy and power figures are external measurements summarized from those papers. The Section 2.2 filter ('Papers had to focus on low-power, real-time implementations aligned with ubiquitous computing principles') is a topical scoping rule: it selects for relevance, and it does not by itself fix the accuracy/power numbers that constitute the survey's evidence. The conclusion is therefore not entailed by the filter in the way a derived equation is entailed by its definition. Several supporting references are to the authors' own prior work (e.g., Banerjee et al. [15,16] in the encoding remark, and their application papers in Tables 2-3), but these are used as surveyed results rather than as an unverified uniqueness theorem or as the sole justification of the paper's central premise; the central claim also rests on numerous independent works (Blouw et al., Bos et al., Taunyazov et al., etc.). Figure 1's 71x power reduction is a self-reported measurement without an external protocol, but it is a reported observation, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, so it is not circular in the sense relevant here. Overall, no claimed result is equivalent to its inputs by construction; the minor self-citation and self-report issues are appropriately reflected in a low non-circularity score of 2.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey introduces no fitted parameters and no invented entities. Its conclusions rest on the representativeness of the selected corpus, the accuracy of transcribed numbers, and the validity of the authors' own Figure 1 power comparison.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption The filtered 76-paper corpus is representative of the SNN-for-time-series literature.
Section 2.2 selects papers by subjective relevance, venue prestige, and citation count, so the survey's coverage and takeaways depend on this representativeness.
domain assumption Energy and accuracy numbers reported in the cited papers are accurately transcribed and mutually comparable.
Tables 2 through 7 compile accuracy and energy metrics from heterogeneous studies; the apparent TIMIT transcription error in Table 4 shows this assumption is fragile.
ad hoc to paper The 71x power reduction claim in Figure 1 is valid.
Section 1 and the Figure 1 caption state the authors 'experimentally found' this reduction, but no dataset, hardware details, model, or measurement protocol is provided, so the survey relies on this unverified result as motivational evidence.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Promise of Spiking Neural Networks for Ubiquitous Computing: A Survey and New Perspectives." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TBFK7AJF

@misc{pith2026250601737,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Promise of Spiking Neural Networks for Ubiquitous Computing: A Survey and New Perspectives},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TBFK7AJF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.01737}
}

read the original abstract

Spiking neural networks (SNNs) have emerged as a class of bio -inspired networks that leverage sparse, event-driven signaling to achieve low-power computation while inherently modeling temporal dynamics. Such characteristics align closely with the demands of ubiquitous computing systems, which often operate on resource-constrained devices while continuously monitoring and processing time-series sensor data. Despite their unique and promising features, SNNs have received limited attention and remain underexplored (or at least, under-adopted) within the ubiquitous computing community. To address this gap, this paper first introduces the core components of SNNs, both in terms of models and training mechanisms. It then presents a systematic survey of 76 SNN-based studies focused on time-series data analysis, categorizing them into six key application domains. For each domain, we summarize relevant works and subsequent advancements, distill core insights, and highlight key takeaways for researchers and practitioners. To facilitate hands-on experimentation, we also provide a comprehensive review of current software frameworks and neuromorphic hardware platforms, detailing their capabilities and specifications, and then offering tailored recommendations for selecting development tools based on specific application needs. Finally, we identify prevailing challenges within each application domain and propose future research directions that need be explored in ubiquitous community. Our survey highlights the transformative potential of SNNs in enabling energy-efficient ubiquitous sensing across diverse application domains, while also serving as an essential introduction for researchers looking to enter this emerging field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.01737 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Application-wise distribution of papers in the filtered corpus. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Biological neuron in contrast with Spiking neuron. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (6 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Rate encoding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Delta encoding. and motion variations in gesture recognition. Specifically, gesture-based studies have employed delta modulation and demonstrated superior performance [133, 174, 202]. 3.3.4 Level Crossing (LC) Sampling. LC Sampling is another type of spike encoding tha…

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Level Crossing (LC) Sampling. spikes at each timestep based on their membrane potential dynamics. Due to its alignment with the fundamental behavior of biological neurons, the LIF-based encoding layer has been widely used in time-series data processing. Remark: Numerou…

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: (a) Dead neuron problem in the flow of gradients in ANN (top) vs SNN (bottom) backpropagation (left), (b) The dead [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Taxonomy based on the applications using SNNs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: An illustration of neuromorphic hardware chipsets. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_10.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

239 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

[63]

Meng Dong, Xuhui Huang, and Bo Xu. 2018. Unsupervised speech recognition through spike-timing-dependent plasticity in a convolutional spiking neural network. PloS one 13, 11 (2018), e0204596

2018
[1]

2022. 7. Sub-mW Neuromorphic SNN Audio Processing Applications with Rockpool and Xylo . 69–78

2022
[2]

DYNAP-CNN

2024. DYNAP-CNN. https://www.synsense.ai/products/dynap-cnn/. Accessed: April 2025

2024
[3]

Essam Abdellatef, Rasha M Al-Makhlasawy, and Wafaa A Shalaby. 2025. Detection of human activities using multi-layer convolutional neural network. Scientific Reports 15, 1 (2025), 7004

2025
[4]

MAH Akhand, MA Maria, MAS Kamal, and K Murase. [n. d.]. Improved EEG-based emotion recognition through information enhancement in connectivity feature map. Sci. Rep. 13, 13804 (2023)

2023
[5]

Abeer Al-Nafjan, Khulud Alharthi, and Heba Kurdi. 2020. Lightweight building of an electroencephalogram-based emotion detection system. Brain Sciences 10, 11 (2020), 781

2020
[6]

Mahmood Alsaadi, Ismail Keshta, Janjhyam Venkata Naga Ramesh, Divya Nimma, Mohammad Shabaz, Nirupma Pathak, Pavitar Parkash Singh, Sherzod Kiyosov, and Mukesh Soni. 2025. Logical reasoning for human activity recognition based on multisource data from wearable device. Scientific Reports 15, 1 (2025), 380

2025
[7]

Wael Alzhrani, Maryam Doborjeh, Zohreh Doborjeh, and Nikola Kasabov. 2021. Emotion recognition and understanding using EEG data in a brain-inspired spiking neural network architecture. In 2021 international joint conference on neural networks (ijcnn) . IEEE, 1–9

2021

Show all 239 references

[8]

Alireza Amirshahi and Matin Hashemi. 2019. ECG Classification Algorithm Based on STDP and R-STDP Neural Networks for Real-Time Monitoring on Ultra Low-Power Personal Wearable Devices. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems 13, 6 (2019), 1483–1493. https://doi.org...

2019
[9]

Davide Anguita, Alessandro Ghio, Luca Oneto, Xavier Parra, Jorge Luis Reyes-Ortiz, et al. 2013. A public domain dataset for human activity recognition using smartphones.. In Esann, Vol. 3. 3–4

2013
[10]

Muhammad Asif, Muhammad Usaid, Munaf Rashid, Tabarka Rajab, Samreen Hussain, and Sarwar Wasi. 2022. Large-scale audio dataset for emergency vehicle sirens and road noises. Scientific data 9, 1 (2022), 599

2022
[11]

Manfredo Atzori, Arjan Gijsberts, Simone Heynen, Anne-Gabrielle Mittaz Hager, Olivier Deriaz, Patrick Van Der Smagt, Claudio Castellini, Barbara Caputo, and Henning Müller. 2012. Building the Ninapro database: A resource for the biorobotics community. In 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EM...

2012
[12]

Daniel Auge, Julian Hille, Felix Kreutz, Etienne Mueller, and Alois Knoll. 2021. End-to-end spiking neural network for speech recognition using resonating input neurons. In International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks . Springer, 245–256

2021
[13]

Daniel Auge, Julian Hille, Etienne Mueller, and Alois Knoll. 2021. A survey of encoding techniques for signal processing in spiking neural networks. Neural Processing Letters 53, 6 (2021), 4693–4710

2021
[14]

Jimmy Ba and Rich Caruana. 2014. Do deep nets really need to be deep? Advances in neural information processing systems 27 (2014)

2014
[15]

George, and Arijit Mukherjee

Dighanchal Banerjee, Sounak Dey, Arun M. George, and Arijit Mukherjee. 2020. Efficient Optimized Spike Encoding for Spiking Neural Networks. In 12th OPT Workshop, 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (Virtual Event, USA) (NeurIPS ’20). https://opt...

2020
[16]

George, and Arijit Mukherjee

Dighanchal Banerjee, Sounak Dey, Arun M. George, and Arijit Mukherjee. 2022. Efficient Optimized Spike Encoding of Multivariate Time-series. In Proceedings of the 2022 Annual Neuro-Inspired Computational Elements Conference (Virtual Event, USA) (NICE ’22). Association for Comp...

2022
[17]

Dighanchal Banerjee, Sounak Dey, and Arpan Pal. 2022. An snn based ecg classifier for wearable edge devices. InNeurIPS 2022 workshop on learning from time series for health

2022
[18]

Dighanchal Banerjee, Sounak Dey, and Arpan Pal. 2024. Atrial Fibrillation Detector from ECG on Wearable Edge Devices using Spiking Neural Networks. In 2024 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) . 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN60899.2024. 10650023

2024
[19]

Dighanchal Banerjee, Sounak Dey, and Arpan Pal. 2024. Atrial Fibrillation Detector from ECG on Wearable Edge Devices using Spiking Neural Networks. In 2024 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) . IEEE, 1–8

2024
[20]

George, Arijit Chowdhury, Sounak Dey, Arijit Mukherjee, Tapas Chakravarty, and Arpan Pal

Dighanchal Banerjee, Smriti Rani, Arun M. George, Arijit Chowdhury, Sounak Dey, Arijit Mukherjee, Tapas Chakravarty, and Arpan Pal. 2020. Application of Spiking Neural Networks for Action Recognition from Radar Data. In 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (I...

2020
[21]

Felix Christian Bauer, Dylan Richard Muir, and Giacomo Indiveri. 2019. Real-Time Ultra-Low Power ECG Anomaly Detection Using an Event-Driven Neuromorphic Processor. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems 13, 6 (2019), 1575–1582. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBCAS.2019.2953001

2019
[22]

Trevor Bekolay, James Bergstra, Eric Hunsberger, Travis DeWolf, Terrence C Stewart, Daniel Rasmussen, Xuan Choo, Aaron Russell Voelker, and Chris Eliasmith. 2014. Nengo: a Python tool for building large-scale functional brain models. Frontiers in neuroinformatics 7 (2014), 48

2014
[23]

Curtis C Bell, Victor Z Han, Yoshiko Sugawara, and Kirsty Grant. 1997. Synaptic plasticity in a cerebellum-like structure depends on temporal order. Nature 387, 6630 (1997), 278–281

1997
[24]

Guillaume Bellec, Darjan Salaj, Anand Subramoney, Robert Legenstein, and Wolfgang Maass. 2018. Long short-term memory and learning-to-learn in networks of spiking neurons. Advances in neural information processing systems 31 (2018)

2018
[25]

Moshe Bensimon, Shlomo Greenberg, and Moshe Haiut. 2021. Using a low-power spiking continuous time neuron (SCTN) for sound signal processing. Sensors 21, 4 (2021), 1065

2021
[26]

Haoyu Bian, Bin Guo, Sicong Liu, Yasan Ding, Shanshan Gao, and Zhiwen Yu. 2024. UbiHR: Resource-efficient Long-range Heart Rate Sensing on Ubiquitous Devices. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 8, 4 (2024), 1–26

2024
[27]

Sizhen Bian, Elisa Donati, and Michele Magno. 2024. Evaluation of Encoding Schemes on Ubiquitous Sensor Signal for Spiking Neural Network. IEEE Sensors Journal (2024)

2024
[28]

Sizhen Bian and Michele Magno. 2023. Evaluating Spiking Neural Network on Neuromorphic Platform For Human Activity Recognition. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (Cancun, Quintana Roo, Mexico)(ISWC ’23). Association for Computing Mach...

2023
[29]

Sizhen Bian, Vitor Fortes Rey, Siyu Yuan, and Paul Lukowicz. 2022. The contribution of human body capacitance/body-area electric field to individual and collaborative activity recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.14794 (2022)

2022 arXiv
[30]

Peter Blouw, Xuan Choo, Eric Hunsberger, and Chris Eliasmith. 2019. Benchmarking Keyword Spotting Efficiency on Neuromorphic Hardware. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Neuro-Inspired Computational Elements Workshop (Albany, NY, USA) (NICE ’19). Association for Computing Machin...

2019
[31]

Marius Bock, Michael Moeller, and Kristof Van Laerhoven. 2024. Temporal Action Localization for Inertial-based Human Activity Recognition. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 8, 4 (2024), 1–19. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publicat...

2024
[32]

Sander M Bohte, Joost N Kok, and Han La Poutre. 2002. Error-backpropagation in temporally encoded networks of spiking neurons. Neurocomputing 48, 1-4 (2002), 17–37

2002
[33]

Hannah Bos and Dylan R Muir. 2024. Micro-power spoken keyword spotting on Xylo Audio 2. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.15112 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[34]

Ralf Bousseljot, Dieter Kreiseler, and Allard Schnabel. 1995. Nutzung der EKG-Signaldatenbank CARDIODAT der PTB über das Internet. (1995)

1995
[35]

Maxence Bouvier, Alexandre Valentian, Thomas Mesquida, Francois Rummens, Marina Reyboz, Elisa Vianello, and Edith Beigne. 2019. Spiking neural networks hardware implementations and challenges: A survey. ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems (JETC) 15, 2 (20...

2019
[36]

Kendra S Burbank. 2015. Mirrored STDP implements autoencoder learning in a network of spiking neurons. PLoS computational biology 11, 12 (2015), e1004566

2015
[37]

Enea Ceolini, Charlotte Frenkel, Sumit Bam Shrestha, Gemma Taverni, Lyes Khacef, Melika Payvand, and Elisa Donati. 2020. Hand- gesture recognition based on EMG and event-based camera sensor fusion: A benchmark in neuromorphic computing. Frontiers in neuroscience 14 (2020), 637

2020
[39]

Y Chen and E Keogh. [n. d.]. ECG5000 dataset (2000). URL http://www. timeseriesclassification. com/description. php ([n. d.])

2000
[40]

Haoming Chu, Hao Jia, Yulong Yan, Yi Jin, Liyu Qian, Leijing Gan, Yuxiang Huan, Lirong Zheng, and Zhuo Zou. 2021. A Neuromorphic Processing System for Low-Power Wearable ECG Classification. In 2021 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS) . 1–5. https://doi.org...

2021
[41]

Haoming Chu, Yulong Yan, Leijing Gan, Hao Jia, Liyu Qian, Yuxiang Huan, Lirong Zheng, and Zhuo Zou. 2022. A neuromorphic processing system with spike-driven SNN processor for wearable ECG classification. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems 16, 4 (2022), 511–523

2022
[42]

Gari D Clifford, Chengyu Liu, Benjamin Moody, Li-wei H Lehman, Ikaro Silva, Qiao Li, AE Johnson, and Roger G Mark. 2017. AF classification from a short single lead ECG recording: The PhysioNet/computing in cardiology challenge 2017. In 2017 computing in cardiology (CinC). IEEE, 1–4

2017
[43]

Iulia M Comsa, Krzysztof Potempa, Luca Versari, Thomas Fischbacher, Andrea Gesmundo, and Jyrki Alakuijala. 2020. Temporal coding in spiking neural networks with alpha synaptic function. In ICASSP 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processin...

2020
[44]

Federico Corradi, Sandeep Pande, Jan Stuijt, Ning Qiao, Siebren Schaafsma, Giacomo Indiveri, and Francky Catthoor. 2019. ECG-based Heartbeat Classification in Neuromorphic Hardware. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2019.8852279

2019
[45]

Alice Coucke, Mohammed Chlieh, Thibault Gisselbrecht, David Leroy, Mathieu Poumeyrol, and Thibaut Lavril. 2019. Efficient keyword spotting using dilated convolutions and gating. In ICASSP 2019-2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASS...

2019
[46]

Benjamin Cramer, Yannik Stradmann, Johannes Schemmel, and Friedemann Zenke. 2020. The heidelberg spiking data sets for the systematic evaluation of spiking neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 33, 7 (2020), 2744–2757

2020
[48]

Ali Dabbous, Ali Ibrahim, Maurizio Valle, and Chiara Bartolozzi. 2021. Touch Modality Classification using Spiking Neural Networks and Supervised-STDP Learning. In 2021 28th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems (ICECS) . 1–4. https: //doi.org/10....

2021
[49]

Manon Dampfhoffer, Thomas Mesquida, Alexandre Valentian, and Lorena Anghel. 2024. Backpropagation-Based Learning Techniques for Deep Spiking Neural Networks: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 35, 9 (2024), 11906–11921. https://doi.org/10.1109/...

2024
[50]

Gourav Datta, Haoqin Deng, Robert Aviles, and Peter A Beerel. 2022. Towards energy-efficient, low-latency and accurate spiking LSTMs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.12613 (2022)

2022 arXiv
[51]

Gourav Datta, Souvik Kundu, and Peter A Beerel. 2021. Training energy-efficient deep spiking neural networks with single-spike hybrid input encoding. In 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) . IEEE, 1–8

2021
[52]

Hoang Anh Dau, Anthony Bagnall, Kaveh Kamgar, Chin-Chia Michael Yeh, Yan Zhu, Shaghayegh Gharghabi, Chotirat Ann Ratanama- hatana, and Eamonn Keogh. 2019. The UCR time series archive. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica 6, 6 (2019), 1293–1305

2019
[53]

Mike Davies, Narayan Srinivasa, Tsung-Han Lin, Gautham Chinya, Yongqiang Cao, Sri Harsha Choday, Georgios Dimou, Prasad Joshi, Nabil Imam, Shweta Jain, et al. 2018. Loihi: A neuromorphic manycore processor with on-chip learning. Ieee Micro 38, 1 (2018), 82–99

2018
[54]

Matthias De Lange, Rahaf Aljundi, Marc Masana, Sarah Parisot, Xu Jia, Aleš Leonardis, Gregory Slabaugh, and Tinne Tuytelaars. 2021. A continual learning survey: Defying forgetting in classification tasks. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 44, , Vol...

2021
[55]

David Dean, Sridha Sridharan, Robert Vogt, and Michael Mason. 2010. The QUT-NOISE-TIMIT corpus for evaluation of voice activity detection algorithms. In Proceedings of the 11th annual conference of the international speech communication association . International Speech Commu...

2010
[56]

Giorgia Dellaferrera, Flavio Martinelli, and Milos Cernak. 2020. A bin encoding training of a spiking neural network based voice activity detection. In ICASSP 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) . IEEE, 3207–3211

2020
[57]

Lei Deng, Yujie Wu, Xing Hu, Ling Liang, Yufei Ding, Guoqi Li, Guangshe Zhao, Peng Li, and Yuan Xie. 2020. Rethinking the performance comparison between SNNS and ANNS. Neural networks 121 (2020), 294–307

2020
[58]

Jonathan Dennis, Tran Huy Dat, and Haizhou Li. 2015. Combining robust spike coding with spiking neural networks for sound event classification. In 2015 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP) . IEEE, 176–180

2015
[59]

George, Arijit Mukherjee, and Arpan Pal

Sounak Dey, Dighanchal Banerjee, Arun M. George, Arijit Mukherjee, and Arpan Pal. 2022. Efficient Time Series Classification using Spiking Reservoir. In 2022 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) . 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN55064.2022. 9892728

2022
[60]

Peter U Diehl, Daniel Neil, Jonathan Binas, Matthew Cook, Shih-Chii Liu, and Michael Pfeiffer. 2015. Fast-classifying, high-accuracy spiking deep networks through weight and threshold balancing. In 2015 International joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN) . ieee, 1–8

2015
[61]

Juan P Dominguez-Morales, Qian Liu, Robert James, Daniel Gutierrez-Galan, Angel Jimenez-Fernandez, Simon Davidson, and Steve Furber. 2018. Deep spiking neural network model for time-variant signals classification: a real-time speech recognition approach. In 2018 International ...

2018
[62]

Elisa Donati, Melika Payvand, Nicoletta Risi, Renate Krause, and Giacomo Indiveri. 2019. Discrimination of EMG Signals Using a Neuromorphic Implementation of a Spiking Neural Network. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems 13, 5 (2019), 795–803. https://doi.org/1...

2019
[64]

Bard Ermentrout. 1996. Type I membranes, phase resetting curves, and synchrony. Neural computation 8, 5 (1996), 979–1001

1996
[65]

Jason K Eshraghian, Max Ward, Emre O Neftci, Xinxin Wang, Gregor Lenz, Girish Dwivedi, Mohammed Bennamoun, Doo Seok Jeong, and Wei D Lu. 2023. Training spiking neural networks using lessons from deep learning. Proc. IEEE (2023)

2023
[66]

Wei Fang, Yanqi Chen, Jianhao Ding, Zhaofei Yu, Timothée Masquelier, Ding Chen, Liwei Huang, Huihui Zhou, Guoqi Li, and Yonghong Tian. 2023. Spikingjelly: An open-source machine learning infrastructure platform for spike-based intelligence. Science Advances 9, 40 (2023), eadi1480

2023
[67]

Abolfazl Farahani, Sahar Voghoei, Khaled Rasheed, and Hamid R Arabnia. 2021. A brief review of domain adaptation. Advances in data science and information engineering: proceedings from ICDATA 2020 and IKE 2020 (2021), 877–894

2021
[68]

Yifei Feng, Shijia Geng, Jianjun Chu, Zhaoji Fu, and Shenda Hong. 2022. Building and training a deep spiking neural network for ECG classification. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 77 (2022), 103749

2022
[69]

Jone Follmann, Cosimo Gentile, Francesca Cordella, Loredana Zollo, and Cesar Ramos Rodrigues. 2024. Touch and slippage detection in robotic hands with spiking neural networks. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 136 (2024), 108953

2024
[70]

Vittorio Fra, Evelina Forno, Riccardo Pignari, Terrence C Stewart, Enrico Macii, and Gianvito Urgese. 2022. Human activity recognition: suitability of a neuromorphic approach for on-edge AIoT applications. Neuromorphic Computing and Engineering 2, 1 (2022), 014006

2022
[71]

Robert H Fujii and Kenjyu Oozeki. 2006. Temporal data encoding and sequencelearning with spiking neural networks. In Artificial Neural Networks–ICANN 2006: 16th International Conference, Athens, Greece, September 10-14, 2006. Proceedings, Part I 16 . Springer, 780–789

2006
[72]

Daiheng Gao, Hongwei Wang, Hehui Zhang, Meng Wang, and Zhenzhi Wu. [n. d.]. A SPIKING SEQUENTIAL MODEL: RECURRENT LEAKY INTEGRATE-AND-FIRE. ([n. d.])
[73]

Ruihan Gao, Tasbolat Taunyazov, Zhiping Lin, and Yan Wu. 2020. Supervised autoencoder joint learning on heterogeneous tactile sensory data: Improving material classification performance. In 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, ...

2020
[74]

John S Garofolo, Lori F Lamel, William M Fisher, David S Pallett, Nancy L Dahlgren, Victor Zue, and Jonathan G Fiscus. 1993. TIMIT acoustic-phonetic continuous speech corpus. (No Title) (1993)

1993
[75]

George, Sounak Dey, Dighanchal Banerjee, Arijit Mukherjee, and Manan Suri

Arun M. George, Sounak Dey, Dighanchal Banerjee, Arijit Mukherjee, and Manan Suri. 2023. Online time-series forecasting using spiking reservoir. Neurocomputing 518 (2023), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2022.10.067

2023 doi
[76]

Arun M George, Andrew Gigie, A Anil Kumar, Sounak Dey, Arpan Pal, and K Aditi. 2022. EchoWrite-SNN: Acoustic Based Air-Written Shape Recognition Using Spiking Neural Networks. In 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) . 1067–1071. https://doi.org/10....

2022
[77]

Stefan Gerber, Marc Steiner, Maryada, Giacomo Indiveri, and Elisa Donati. 2022. Neuromorphic implementation of ECG anomaly detection using delay chains. In 2022 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS) . 369–373. https://doi.org/10.1109/ , Vol. 1, No. 1, Articl...

2022
[78]

Wulfram Gerstner. 1995. Time structure of the activity in neural network models. Physical review E 51, 1 (1995), 738

1995
[79]

Wulfram Gerstner and Werner M Kistler. 2002. Spiking neuron models: Single neurons, populations, plasticity . Cambridge university press

2002
[80]

Wulfram Gerstner, Raphael Ritz, and J Leo Van Hemmen. 1993. Why spikes? Hebbian learning and retrieval of time-resolved excitation patterns. Biological cybernetics 69, 5 (1993), 503–515

1993
[81]

Marc-Oliver Gewaltig and Markus Diesmann. 2007. NEST (NEural Simulation Tool). Scholarpedia 2, 4 (2007), 1430. https://doi.org/10. 4249/scholarpedia.1430

2007
[82]

Samanwoy Ghosh-Dastidar and Hojjat Adeli. 2009. Spiking neural networks. International journal of neural systems 19, 04 (2009), 295–308

2009
[83]

Andrew Gigie, Arun M George, A Anil Kumar, Sounak Dey, and Arpan Pal. 2023. StereoGest-SNN: Robust Gesture Detection With Stereo Acoustic Setup Using Spiking Neural Networks. In 2023 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) . 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/IS...

2023
[84]

Jennifer Gohumpu, Mengru Xue, and Yanchi Bao. 2023. Emotion recognition with multi-modal peripheral physiological signals. Frontiers in Computer Science 5 (2023), 1264713

2023
[85]

Fuqiang Gu, Weicong Sng, Tasbolat Taunyazov, and Harold Soh. 2020. TactileSGNet: A Spiking Graph Neural Network for Event- based Tactile Object Recognition. In 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) . 9876–9882. https://doi.org/10.1109/...

2020
[86]

Weiyu Guo, Ying Sun, Yijie Xu, Ziyue Qiao, Yongkui Yang, and Hui Xiong. 2024. SpGesture: Source-Free Domain-adaptive sEMG-based Gesture Recognition with Jaccard Attentive Spiking Neural Network. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.14398 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[87]

Bing Han and Kaushik Roy. 2020. Deep spiking neural network: Energy efficiency through time based coding. In European conference on computer vision. Springer, 388–404

2020
[88]

Song Han, Huizi Mao, and William J Dally. 2015. Deep compression: Compressing deep neural networks with pruning, trained quantization and huffman coding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.00149 (2015)

2015 arXiv
[89]

Song Han, Jeff Pool, John Tran, and William J. Dally. 2015. Learning both weights and connections for efficient neural networks. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems - Volume 1 (Montreal, Canada) (NIPS’15). MIT Press, Cam...

2015
[90]

Hananel Hazan, Daniel J Saunders, Hassaan Khan, Devdhar Patel, Darpan T Sanghavi, Hava T Siegelmann, and Robert Kozma. 2018. Bindsnet: A machine learning-oriented spiking neural networks library in python. Frontiers in neuroinformatics 12 (2018), 89

2018
[91]

Geoffrey Hinton. 2015. Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531 (2015)

2015 arXiv
[92]

Alan L Hodgkin and Andrew F Huxley. 1952. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. The Journal of physiology 117, 4 (1952), 500

1952
[93]

Zejiang Hou and Sun-Yuan Kung. 2022. Multi-Dimensional Dynamic Model Compression for Efficient Image Super-Resolution. In 2022 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (W ACV). 3492–3502. https://doi.org/10.1109/WACV51458.2022.00355

2022
[94]

Andrew G Howard. 2017. Mobilenets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04861 (2017)

2017 arXiv
[95]

Yongrui Huang, Jianhao Yang, Pengkai Liao, and Jiahui Pan. 2017. Fusion of facial expressions and EEG for multimodal emotion recognition. Computational intelligence and neuroscience 2017, 1 (2017), 2107451

2017
[96]

Zhaojing Huang, Wing Hang Leung, Leping Yu, Luis Fernando Herbozo Contreras, Ziyao Zhang, Nhan Duy Truong, Armin Nikpour, and Omid Kavehei. 2024. On-device edge-learning for cardiac abnormality detection using a bio-inspired and spiking shallow network. APL Machine Learning 2,...

2024
[97]

Intel Neuromorphic Computing Team. 2024. Lava Software Framework: A Software Framework for Neuromorphic Computing. https://lava-nc.org. Accessed: 10 June 2024

2024
[98]

Naomi Irvine, Chris Nugent, Shuai Zhang, Hui Wang, and Wing WY Ng. 2019. Neural network ensembles for sensor-based human activity recognition within smart environments. Sensors 20, 1 (2019), 216

2019
[99]

Eugene M Izhikevich. 2003. Simple model of spiking neurons. IEEE Transactions on neural networks 14, 6 (2003), 1569–1572

2003
[100]

Eugene M Izhikevich. 2007. Solving the distal reward problem through linkage of STDP and dopamine signaling. Cerebral cortex 17, 10 (2007), 2443–2452

2007
[101]

Zohar Jackson, César Souza, Jason Flaks, Yuxin Pan, Hereman Nicolas, and Adhish Thite. 2018. Jakobovski/free-spoken-digit-dataset: v1. 0.8. Zenodo, August (2018)

2018
[102]

Jianxin Wu Jian-Hao Luo and Weiyao Lin. 2017. ThiNet: A Filter Level Pruning Method for Deep Neural Network Compression. In ICCV. 5058–5066

2017
[103]

Peng Kang, Srutarshi Banerjee, Henry Chopp, Aggelos Katsaggelos, and Oliver Cossairt. 2023. Boost event-driven tactile learning with location spiking neurons. Frontiers in Neuroscience 17 (2023), 1127537. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: September 2025. The Promise...

2023
[104]

Nikola K Kasabov. 2014. NeuCube: A spiking neural network architecture for mapping, learning and understanding of spatio-temporal brain data. Neural Networks 52 (2014), 62–76

2014
[105]

Stamos Katsigiannis and Naeem Ramzan. 2017. DREAMER: A database for emotion recognition through EEG and ECG signals from wireless low-cost off-the-shelf devices. IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics 22, 1 (2017), 98–107

2017
[106]

Weijie Ke, Mina Khoei, and Dylan Muir. 2024. Neurobench: DCASE 2020 Acoustic Scene Classification benchmark on XyloAudio 2. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.23776 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[107]

Jaehun Kim, Sung-Phil Kim, Jungjun Kim, Heeseon Hwang, Jaehyun Kim, Doowon Park, and Unyong Jeong. 2020. Object shape recognition using tactile sensor arrays by a spiking neural network with unsupervised learning. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybe...

2020
[108]

Sander Koelstra, Christian Muhl, Mohammad Soleymani, Jong-Seok Lee, Ashkan Yazdani, Touradj Ebrahimi, Thierry Pun, Anton Nijholt, and Ioannis Patras. 2011. Deap: A database for emotion analysis; using physiological signals. IEEE transactions on affective computing 3, 1 (2011), 18–31

2011
[109]

Shreya Kshirasagar, Benjamin Cramer, Andre Guntoro, and Christian Mayr. 2024. Auditory Anomaly Detection using Recurrent Spiking Neural Networks. In 2024 IEEE 6th International Conference on AI Circuits and Systems (AICAS) . IEEE, 278–281

2024
[110]

Lane, Sourav Bhattacharya, Petko Georgiev, Claudio Forlivesi, Lei Jiao, Lorena Qendro, and Fahim Kawsar

Nicholas D. Lane, Sourav Bhattacharya, Petko Georgiev, Claudio Forlivesi, Lei Jiao, Lorena Qendro, and Fahim Kawsar. 2016. DeepX: A Software Accelerator for Low-Power Deep Learning Inference on Mobile Devices. In 2016 15th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Proce...

2016
[111]

L Lapicque. 1907. Recherches quantitatives sur l’excitation electrique des nerfs. Journal de physiologie et de pathologie générale 9 (1907), 620–635

1907
[112]

Chankyu Lee, Syed Shakib Sarwar, and Kaushik Roy. 2019. Enabling spike-based backpropagation in state-of-the-art deep neural network architectures.(2019). arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.06379 (2019)

2019 arXiv
[113]

Jin Pyo Lee, Hanhyeok Jang, Yeonwoo Jang, Hyeonseo Song, Suwoo Lee, Pooi See Lee, and Jiyun Kim. 2024. Encoding of multi-modal emotional information via personalized skin-integrated wireless facial interface. Nature Communications 15, 1 (2024), 530

2024
[114]

Clayton Frederick Souza Leite and Yu Xiao. 2022. Resource-efficient continual learning for sensor-based human activity recognition. ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems 21, 6 (2022), 1–25

2022
[115]

Gregor Lenz, Kenneth Chaney, Sumit Bam Shrestha, Omar Oubari, Serge Picaud, and Guido Zarrella. 2021. Tonic: event-based datasets and transformations. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5079802 Documentation available under https://tonic.readthedocs.io

2021 doi
[116]

R Gary Leonard and George Doddington. 1993. TIDIGITS LDC93S10. Web Download. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium (1993)

1993
[117]

Cong Sheng Leow, Wang Ling Goh, and Yuan Gao. 2023. Sparsity Through Spiking Convolutional Neural Network for Audio Classification at the Edge. In 2023 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) . IEEE, 1–4

2023
[118]

Anna Li, Eliane Bodanese, Stefan Poslad, Tianwei Hou, Kaishun Wu, and Fei Luo. 2022. A trajectory-based gesture recognition in smart homes based on the ultrawideband communication system. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 9, 22 (2022), 22861–22873

2022
[119]

Hao Li, Asim Kadav, Igor Durdanovic, Hanan Samet, and Hans Peter Graf. 2016. Pruning filters for efficient convnets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.08710 (2016)

2016 arXiv
[120]

Wei Li, Cheng Fang, Zhihao Zhu, Chuyi Chen, and Aiguo Song. 2023. Fractal spiking neural network scheme for EEG-based emotion recognition. IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine (2023)

2023
[121]

Wanqing Li, Zhengyou Zhang, and Zicheng Liu. 2010. Action recognition based on a bag of 3d points. In 2010 IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition-workshops . IEEE, 9–14

2010
[122]

Yuhang Li, Ruokai Yin, Youngeun Kim, and Priyadarshini Panda. 2023. Efficient human activity recognition with spatio-temporal spiking neural networks. Frontiers in Neuroscience 17 (09 2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1233037

2023
[123]

Yuhang Li, Ruokai Yin, Hyoungseob Park, Youngeun Kim, and Priyadarshini Panda. 2022. Wearable-based Human Activity Recognition with Spatio-Temporal Spiking Neural Networks. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.02233

2022 doi arXiv
[124]

Zhenghui Li, Julien Le Kernec, Qammer Abbasi, Francesco Fioranelli, Shufan Yang, and Olivier Romain. 2023. Radar-based human activity recognition with adaptive thresholding towards resource constrained platforms. Scientific Reports 13, 1 (2023), 3473

2023
[125]

Jian Liang, Ran He, and Tieniu Tan. 2025. A comprehensive survey on test-time adaptation under distribution shifts. International Journal of Computer Vision 133, 1 (2025), 31–64

2025
[126]

Fangxin Liu, Wenbo Zhao, Yongbiao Chen, Zongwu Wang, Tao Yang, and Li Jiang. 2021. SSTDP: Supervised spike timing dependent plasticity for efficient spiking neural network training. Frontiers in Neuroscience 15 (2021), 756876

2021
[127]

Qian Liu, Ole Richter, Carsten Nielsen, Sadique Sheik, Giacomo Indiveri, and Ning Qiao. 2019. Live demonstration: face recognition on an ultra-low power event-driven convolutional neural network asic. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Rec...

2019
[128]

Zhuang Liu, Jianguo Li, Zhiqiang Shen, Gao Huang, Shoumeng Yan, and Changshui Zhang. 2017. Learning efficient convolutional networks through network slimming. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision . 2736–2744

2017
[129]

Chamika Mihiranga Liyanagedera, Manish Nagaraj, Wachirawit Ponghiran, and Kaushik Roy. 2023. Low-Power Real-Time Sequential Processing with Spiking Neural Networks. In 2023 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) . IEEE, 1–5. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Pub...

2023
[130]

BrainChip Holdings Ltd. 2023. Akida Neural Processor SoC. https://brainchip.com/akida-neural-processor-soc/ [Online]

2023
[131]

Yuling Luo, Qiang Fu, Juntao Xie, Yunbai Qin, Guopei Wu, Junxiu Liu, Frank Jiang, Yi Cao, and Xuemei Ding. 2020. EEG-based emotion classification using spiking neural networks. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 46007–46016

2020
[132]

Chenxiang Ma, Xinyi Chen, Yanchen Li, Qu Yang, Yujie Wu, Guoqi Li, Gang Pan, Huajin Tang, Kay Chen Tan, and Jibin Wu. 2025. Spiking Neural Networks for Temporal Processing: Status Quo and Future Prospects. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.09449 (2025)

2025 arXiv
[133]

Yongqiang Ma, Elisa Donati, Badong Chen, Pengju Ren, Nanning Zheng, and Giacomo Indiveri. 2020. Neuromorphic Implementation of a Recurrent Neural Network for EMG Classification. In 2020 2nd IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Circuits and Systems (AICAS). ...

2020
[134]

Flavio Martinelli, Giorgia Dellaferrera, Pablo Mainar, and Milos Cernak. 2020. Spiking neural networks trained with backpropagation for low power neuromorphic implementation of voice activity detection. InICASSP 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and ...

2020
[135]

Timothée Masquelier and Simon J Thorpe. 2007. Unsupervised learning of visual features through spike timing dependent plasticity. PLoS computational biology 3, 2 (2007), e31

2007
[136]

Karolina Mateńczuk, Agata Kozina, Aleksandra Markowska, Kateryna Czerniachowska, Klaudia Kaczmarczyk, Paweł Golec, Marcin Hernes, Krzysztof Lutosławski, Adrianna Kozierkiewicz, Marcin Pietranik, et al. 2021. Financial time series forecasting: Comparison of traditional and spik...

2021
[137]

Ali Mehrabi, Nik Dennler, Yeshwanth Bethi, André van Schaik, and Saeed Afshar. 2024. Real-time anomaly detection using hardware- based unsupervised spiking neural network (tinysnn). In 2024 IEEE 33rd International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE) . IEEE, 1–8

2024
[138]

Gabriele Meoni, Luca Pilato, and Luca Fanucci. 2018. A low power voice activity detector for portable applications. In 2018 14th conference on Ph. D. research in microelectronics and electronics (PRIME) . IEEE, 41–44

2018
[139]

Annamaria Mesaros, Toni Heittola, and Tuomas Virtanen. 2018. A multi-device dataset for urban acoustic scene classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.09840 (2018)

2018 arXiv
[140]

Daniela Micucci, Marco Mobilio, and Paolo Napoletano. 2017. Unimib shar: A dataset for human activity recognition using acceleration data from smartphones. Applied Sciences 7, 10 (2017), 1101

2017
[141]

Marek Miskowicz. 2006. Send-on-delta concept: An event-based data reporting strategy. sensors 6, 1 (2006), 49–63

2006
[142]

Navid Mohammadi Foumani, Lynn Miller, Chang Wei Tan, Geoffrey I Webb, Germain Forestier, and Mahsa Salehi. 2024. Deep learning for time series classification and extrinsic regression: A current survey. Comput. Surveys 56, 9 (2024), 1–45

2024
[143]

Pavlo Molchanov, Stephen Tyree, Tero Karras, Timo Aila, and Jan Kautz. 2016. Pruning convolutional neural networks for resource efficient inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.06440 (2016)

2016 arXiv
[144]

George Moody. 1983. A new method for detecting atrial fibrillation using RR intervals. Proc. Comput. Cardiol. 10 (1983), 227–230

1983
[145]

George B Moody and Roger G Mark. 2001. The impact of the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database. IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine 20, 3 (2001), 45–50

2001
[146]

Catherine Morris and Harold Lecar. 1981. Voltage oscillations in the barnacle giant muscle fiber. Biophysical journal 35, 1 (1981), 193–213

1981
[147]

Bernhard A Moser and Thomas Natschläger. 2014. On stability of distance measures for event sequences induced by level-crossing sampling. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 62, 8 (2014), 1987–1999

2014
[148]

Muir, Felix Bauer, and Philipp Weidel

Dylan R. Muir, Felix Bauer, and Philipp Weidel. 2019. Rockpool Documentaton. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3773845

2019 doi
[149]

Anand Kumar Mukhopadhyay, Moses Prabhakar Naligala, Divya Lakshmi Duggisetty, Indrajit Chakrabarti, and Mrigank Sharad. 2022. Acoustic scene analysis using analog spiking neural network. Neuromorphic Computing and Engineering 2, 4 (2022), 044003

2022
[150]

Satoshi Nakamura, Kazuo Hiyane, Futoshi Asano, Takanobu Nishiura, and Takeshi Yamada. 2000. Acoustical sound database in real environments for sound scene understanding and hands-free speech recognition. (2000)

2000
[151]

Innatera Nanosystems. 2024. Spiking Neural Processor T1. https://innatera.com/products/spiking-neural-processor-t1 [Online]

2024
[152]

Kamil Nar, Yuan Xue, and Andrew M Dai. 2020. Learning unstable dynamical systems with time-weighted logarithmic loss. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.05189 (2020)

2020 arXiv
[153]

Emre O Neftci, Hesham Mostafa, and Friedemann Zenke. 2019. Surrogate gradient learning in spiking neural networks: Bringing the power of gradient-based optimization to spiking neural networks. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 36, 6 (2019), 51–63

2019
[154]

Nunes, Marcelo Carvalho, Diogo Carneiro, and Jaime S

João D. Nunes, Marcelo Carvalho, Diogo Carneiro, and Jaime S. Cardoso. 2022. Spiking Neural Networks: A Survey. IEEE Access 10 (2022), 60738–60764. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3179968

2022
[155]

Mohanad Odema, Nafiul Rashid, and Mohammad Abdullah Al Faruque. 2021. EExNAS: Early-Exit Neural Architecture Search Solutions for Low-Power Wearable Devices. In 2021 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design (ISLPED) . 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IS...

2021
[156]

Robert Thomas Olszewski. 2001. Generalized feature extraction for structural pattern recognition in time-series data . Carnegie Mellon University. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: September 2025. The Promise of Spiking Neural Networks for Ubiquitous Computing: A Su...

2001
[157]

Vassil Panayotov, Guoguo Chen, Daniel Povey, and Sanjeev Khudanpur. 2015. Librispeech: an asr corpus based on public domain audio books. In 2015 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP) . IEEE, 5206–5210

2015
[158]

Christian Pehle and Jens Egholm Pedersen. 2021. Norse - A deep learning library for spiking neural networks . https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.4422025 Documentation: https://norse.ai/docs/

2021
[159]

Nicolas Perez-Nieves, Vincent CH Leung, Pier Luigi Dragotti, and Dan FM Goodman. 2021. Neural heterogeneity promotes robust learning. Nature communications 12, 1 (2021), 5791

2021
[160]

Michael Pfeiffer and Thomas Pfeil. 2018. Deep learning with spiking neurons: opportunities and challenges. Frontiers in neuroscience 12 (2018), 409662

2018
[161]

Stefano Pizzolato, Luca Tagliapietra, Matteo Cognolato, Monica Reggiani, Henning Müller, and Manfredo Atzori. 2017. Comparison of six electromyography acquisition setups on hand movement classification tasks. PloS one 12, 10 (2017), e0186132

2017
[162]

Antonio Polino, Razvan Pascanu, and Dan Alistarh. 2018. Model compression via distillation and quantization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.05668 (2018)

2018 arXiv
[163]

Michael Price, James Glass, and Anantha P Chandrakasan. 2017. A low-power speech recognizer and voice activity detector using deep neural networks. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 53, 1 (2017), 66–75

2017
[164]

Amrita Rana and Kyung Ki Kim. 2024. Electrocardiography Classification with Leaky Integrate-and-Fire Neurons in an Artificial Neural Network-Inspired Spiking Neural Network Framework. Sensors 24, 11 (2024), 3426

2024
[165]

Mahdi Rasouli, Yi Chen, Arindam Basu, Sunil L Kukreja, and Nitish V Thakor. 2018. An extreme learning machine-based neuromorphic tactile sensing system for texture recognition. IEEE transactions on biomedical circuits and systems 12, 2 (2018), 313–325

2018
[166]

Nitin Rathi, Indranil Chakraborty, Adarsh Kosta, Abhronil Sengupta, Aayush Ankit, Priyadarshini Panda, and Kaushik Roy. 2023. Exploring neuromorphic computing based on spiking neural networks: Algorithms to hardware. Comput. Surveys 55, 12 (2023), 1–49

2023
[167]

Nitin Rathi and Kaushik Roy. 2021. Diet-snn: A low-latency spiking neural network with direct input encoding and leakage and threshold optimization. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 34, 6 (2021), 3174–3182

2021
[168]

Antônio H Ribeiro, Manoel Horta Ribeiro, Gabriela MM Paixão, Derick M Oliveira, Paulo R Gomes, Jéssica A Canazart, Milton PS Ferreira, Carl R Andersson, Peter W Macfarlane, Wagner Meira Jr, et al. 2020. Automatic diagnosis of the 12-lead ECG using a deep neural network. Nature...

2020
[169]

Ole Richter, Chenxi Wu, Adrian M Whatley, German Köstinger, Carsten Nielsen, Ning Qiao, and Giacomo Indiveri. 2024. DYNAP-SE2: a scalable multi-core dynamic neuromorphic asynchronous spiking neural network processor. Neuromorphic Computing and Engineering 4, 1 (2024), 014003

2024
[170]

Ole Richter, Yannan Xing, Michele De Marchi, Carsten Nielsen, Merkourios Katsimpris, Roberto Cattaneo, Yudi Ren, Yalun Hu, Qian Liu, Sadique Sheik, et al. 2023. Speck: A smart event-based vision sensor with a low latency 327k neuron convolutional neuronal network processing pi...

2023
[171]

Udaya Bhaskar Rongala, Alberto Mazzoni, and Calogero Maria Oddo. 2015. Neuromorphic artificial touch for categorization of naturalistic textures. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems 28, 4 (2015), 819–829

2015
[172]

K Sangeeta, B Swathi, Alok Jain, Vijay Bhutani, Lalit Kumar Tyagi, and Kadhim A Jabbar. 2023. Autonomous Aerial Robots for Search and Rescue Missions. In 2023 10th IEEE Uttar Pradesh Section International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (UPCON), ...

2023
[173]

Birdwell, Mark Dean, Garrett Rose, and James Plank

Catherine Schuman, Thomas Potok, Robert Patton, J. Birdwell, Mark Dean, Garrett Rose, and James Plank. 2017. A Survey of Neuromorphic Computing and Neural Networks in Hardware. (05 2017). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.06963

2017 doi arXiv
[174]

Matteo Antonio Scrugli, Gianluca Leone, Paola Busia, Luigi Raffo, and Paolo Meloni. 2024. Real-Time sEMG Processing with Spiking Neural Networks on a Low-Power 5K-LUT FPGA. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems (2024)

2024
[175]

Argha Sen, Anirban Das, Swadhin Pradhan, and Sandip Chakraborty. 2024. Continuous Multi-user Activity Tracking via Room-Scale mmWave Sensing. In 2024 23rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN) . IEEE, 163–175

2024
[176]

Abhronil Sengupta, Yuting Ye, Robert Wang, Chiao Liu, and Kaushik Roy. 2019. Going deeper in spiking neural networks: VGG and residual architectures. Frontiers in neuroscience 13 (2019), 95

2019
[177]

Jonghyeon Seon, Jaedong Hwang, Jonghwan Mun, and Bohyung Han. 2023. Stop or Forward: Dynamic Layer Skipping for Efficient Action Recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (W ACV) . 3361–3370

2023
[178]

Fatemeh Serpush, Mohammad Bagher Menhaj, Behrooz Masoumi, and Babak Karasfi. 2022. Wearable sensor-based human activity recognition in the smart healthcare system. Computational intelligence and neuroscience 2022, 1 (2022), 1391906

2022
[179]

Dhruv R Seshadri, Ryan T Li, James E Voos, James R Rowbottom, Celeste M Alfes, Christian A Zorman, and Colin K Drummond. 2019. Wearable sensors for monitoring the physiological and biochemical profile of the athlete. NPJ digital medicine 2, 1 (2019), 72

2019
[180]

Sadique Sheik, Gregor Lenz, Felix Bauer, and Nogay Kuepelioglu. [n. d.]. SINABS: A simple Pytorch based SNN library specialised for Speck. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8385545

doi
[181]

Jiangrong Shen, Jian K Liu, and Yueming Wang. 2021. Dynamic spatiotemporal pattern recognition with recurrent spiking neural network. Neural Computation 33, 11 (2021), 2971–2995. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: September 2025. 48 • Sabbella et al

2021
[182]

Sumit B Shrestha and Garrick Orchard. 2018. Slayer: Spike layer error reassignment in time. Advances in neural information processing systems 31 (2018)

2018
[183]

Deepika Singh, Erinc Merdivan, Sten Hanke, Johannes Kropf, Matthieu Geist, and Andreas Holzinger. 2017. Convolutional and recurrent neural networks for activity recognition in smart environment. In Towards Integrative Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction: BIRS Workshop, B...

2017
[184]

Mohammad Soleymani, Jeroen Lichtenauer, Thierry Pun, and Maja Pantic. 2011. A multimodal database for affect recognition and implicit tagging. IEEE transactions on affective computing 3, 1 (2011), 42–55

2011
[185]

Sen Song, Kenneth D Miller, and Larry F Abbott. 2000. Competitive Hebbian learning through spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity. Nature neuroscience 3, 9 (2000), 919–926

2000
[186]

Tengfei Song, Wenming Zheng, Cheng Lu, Yuan Zong, Xilei Zhang, and Zhen Cui. 2019. MPED: A multi-modal physiological emotion database for discrete emotion recognition. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 12177–12191

2019
[187]

Marcel Stimberg, Romain Brette, and Dan FM Goodman. 2019. Brian 2, an intuitive and efficient neural simulator.elife 8 (2019), e47314

2019
[188]

Allan Stisen, Henrik Blunck, Sourav Bhattacharya, Thor Siiger Prentow, Mikkel Baun Kjærgaard, Anind Dey, Tobias Sonne, and Mads Møller Jensen. 2015. Smart devices are different: Assessing and mitigatingmobile sensing heterogeneities for activity recognition. In Proceedings of ...

2015
[189]

Jiong Sun, Erik Billing, Fernando Seoane, Bo Zhou, Dan Högberg, and Paul Hemeren. 2017. Categories of touch: Classifying human touch using a soft tactile sensor. In The robotic sense of touch: From sensing to understanding, workshop at the IEEE International Conference on Robo...

2017
[190]

Nor Surayahani Suriani and Fadilla‘Atyka Nor Rashid. 2021. Smartphone sensor accelerometer data for human activity recognition using spiking neural network. Int. J. Machine Learn. Comput 11 (2021), 298–303

2021
[191]

SynSense. 2022. Xylo ™: Ultra-low power neuromorphic chip. https://www.synsense.ai/products/xylo/. [Online]

2022
[192]

Clarence Tan, Marko Šarlija, and Nikola Kasabov. 2021. NeuroSense: Short-term emotion recognition and understanding based on spiking neural network modelling of spatio-temporal EEG patterns. Neurocomputing 434 (2021), 137–148

2021
[193]

Mingxing Tan and Quoc Le. 2019. Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 6105–6114

2019
[194]

Yee Leong Tan, Yan Chiew Wong, and Syafeeza Ahmad Radzi. 2021. Brain-inspired spiking neural networks for Wi-Fi based human activity recognition. Jordanian Journal of Computers and Information Technology 7, 4 (2021)

2021
[195]

Simone Tanzarella, Massimiliano Iacono, Elisa Donati, Dario Farina, and Chiara Bartolozzi. 2023. Neuromorphic decoding of spinal motor neuron behaviour during natural hand movements for a new generation of wearable neural interfaces. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Reh...

2023
[196]

Tasbolat Taunyazov, Yansong Chua, Ruihan Gao, Harold Soh, and Yan Wu. 2020. Fast texture classification using tactile neural coding and spiking neural network. In 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) . IEEE, 9890–9895

2020
[197]

Tasbolat Taunyazov, Hui Fang Koh, Yan Wu, Caixia Cai, and Harold Soh. 2019. Towards effective tactile identification of textures using a hybrid touch approach. In 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) . IEEE, 4269–4275

2019
[198]

Tasbolat Taunyazov, Weicong Sng, Brian Lim, Hian Hian See, Jethro Kuan, Abdul Fatir Ansari, Benjamin Tee, and Harold Soh. 2020. Event-Driven Visual-Tactile Sensing and Learning for Robots. In Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems . Corvalis, Oregon, USA. https://doi.org...

2020 doi
[199]

Amirhossein Tavanaei, Masoud Ghodrati, Saeed Reza Kheradpisheh, Timothée Masquelier, and Anthony Maida. 2019. Deep learning in spiking neural networks. Neural networks 111 (2019), 47–63

2019
[200]

J Camilo Vasquez Tieck, Sandro Weber, Terrence C Stewart, Jacques Kaiser, Arne Roennau, and Rüdiger Dillmann. 2020. A spiking network classifies human sEMG signals and triggers finger reflexes on a robotic hand. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 131 (2020), 103566

2020
[201]

Aaron Van Den Oord, Sander Dieleman, Heiga Zen, Karen Simonyan, Oriol Vinyals, Alex Graves, Nal Kalchbrenner, Andrew Senior, Koray Kavukcuoglu, et al. 2016. Wavenet: A generative model for raw audio. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.03499 12 (2016)

2016 arXiv
[202]

Antonio Vitale, Elisa Donati, Roger Germann, and Michele Magno. 2022. Neuromorphic Edge Computing for Biomedical Applications: Gesture Classification Using EMG Signals. IEEE Sensors Journal 22, 20 (2022), 19490–19499. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2022.3194678

2022
[203]

Bingsen Wang, Jian Cao, Jue Chen, Shuo Feng, and Yuan Wang. 2023. A new ann-snn conversion method with high accuracy, low latency and good robustness. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence . 3067–3075

2023
[204]

Pete Warden. 1804. Speech commands: A dataset for limited-vocabulary speech recognition. arXiv 2018. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.03209 (1804)

2018 arXiv
[205]

Philipp Weidel and Sadique Sheik. 2021. WaveSense: Efficient Temporal Convolutions with Spiking Neural Networks for Keyword Spotting. arXiv:2111.01456 [cs.LG] https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.01456

2021 arXiv
[206]

Gary Weiss. 2019. WISDM Smartphone and Smartwatch Activity and Biometrics Dataset . UCI Machine Learning Repository. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24432/C5HK59

2019 doi
[207]

Paul J Werbos. 1990. Backpropagation through time: what it does and how to do it. Proc. IEEE 78, 10 (1990), 1550–1560. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: September 2025. The Promise of Spiking Neural Networks for Ubiquitous Computing: A Survey and New Perspectives • 49

1990
[208]

Jibin Wu, Yansong Chua, and Haizhou Li. 2018. A biologically plausible speech recognition framework based on spiking neural networks. In 2018 international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN) . IEEE, 1–8

2018
[209]

Jibin Wu, Yansong Chua, Malu Zhang, Haizhou Li, and Kay Tan. 2018. A Spiking Neural Network Framework for Robust Sound Classification. Frontiers in Neuroscience 12 (11 2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00836

2018
[210]

Jiaxiang Wu, Cong Leng, Yuhang Wang, Qinghao Hu, and Jian Cheng. 2016. Quantized convolutional neural networks for mobile devices. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition . 4820–4828

2016
[211]

Jibin Wu, Qi Liu, Malu Zhang, Zihan Pan, Haizhou Li, and Kay Chen Tan. 2021. HuRAI: A brain-inspired computational model for human-robot auditory interface. Neurocomputing 465 (2021), 103–113

2021
[212]

Jibin Wu, Emre Yılmaz, Malu Zhang, Haizhou Li, and Kay Chen Tan. 2020. Deep spiking neural networks for large vocabulary automatic speech recognition. Frontiers in neuroscience 14 (2020), 199

2020
[213]

Peiliang Wu, Haozhe Zhang, Yao Li, Wenbai Chen, and Guowei Gao. 2024. VT-SGN:Spiking Graph Neural Network for Neuromorphic Visual-Tactile Fusion. IEEE Transactions on Haptics (2024), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2024.3449411

2024
[214]

Yujie Wu, Lei Deng, Guoqi Li, Jun Zhu, and Luping Shi. 2018. Spatio-temporal backpropagation for training high-performance spiking neural networks. Frontiers in neuroscience 12 (2018), 331

2018
[215]

FeiFan Xu, Deng Pan, Haohao Zheng, Yu Ouyang, Zhe Jia, and Hong Zeng. 2024. EESCN: A novel spiking neural network method for EEG-based emotion recognition. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 243 (2024), 107927

2024
[216]

Xuhai Xu, Jun Gong, Carolina Brum, Lilian Liang, Bongsoo Suh, Shivam Kumar Gupta, Yash Agarwal, Laurence Lindsey, Runchang Kang, Behrooz Shahsavari, et al. 2022. Enabling hand gesture customization on wrist-worn devices. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Facto...

2022
[217]

Kashu Yamazaki, Viet-Khoa Vo-Ho, Darshan Bulsara, and Ngan Le. 2022. Spiking neural networks and their applications: A review. Brain Sciences 12, 7 (2022), 863

2022
[218]

Zhanglu Yan, Zhenyu Bai, Tulika Mitra, and Weng-Fai Wong. 2024. SparrowSNN: A Hardware/software Co-design for Energy Efficient ECG Classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.06543 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[219]

Zhanglu Yan, Jun Zhou, and Weng-Fai Wong. 2021. Energy efficient ECG classification with spiking neural network. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 63 (2021), 102170

2021
[220]

Zhanglu Yan, Jun Zhou, and Weng-Fai Wong. 2022. EEG classification with spiking neural network: Smaller, better, more energy efficient. Smart Health 24 (2022), 100261

2022
[221]

Jing Yang, Tingqing Liu, Yaping Ren, Qing Hou, Shaobo Li, and Jianjun Hu. 2023. AM-SGCN: Tactile Object Recognition for Adaptive Multichannel Spiking Graph Convolutional Neural Networks. IEEE Sensors Journal 23, 24 (2023), 30805–30820. https: //doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2023.3329559

2023
[222]

Jing Yang, Qingyuan Wu, Maiqi Huang, and Ting Luo. 2018. Real time human motion recognition via spiking neural network. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering , Vol. 366. IOP Publishing, 012042

2018
[223]

Jing Yang, Zukun Yu, Xiaoyang Ji, Zhidong Su, Shaobo Li, and Yang Cao. 2024. Spiking neural network tactile classification method with faster and more accurate membrane potential representation. IET Collaborative Intelligent Manufacturing 6, 4 (2024), e70004

2024
[224]

Jing Yang, Zukun Yu, Shaobo Li, Yang Cao, JianJun Hu, and Ji Xu. 2024. GGT-SNN: Graph learning and Gaussian prior integrated spiking graph neural network for event-driven tactile object recognition. Information Sciences (2024), 120998

2024
[225]

Minhao Yang, Chung-Heng Yeh, Yiyin Zhou, Joao P Cerqueira, Aurel A Lazar, and Mingoo Seok. 2018. A 1𝜇W voice activity detector using analog feature extraction and digital deep neural network. In 2018 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference-(ISSCC) . IEEE, 346–348

2018
[226]

Qu Yang, Qianhui Liu, Nan Li, Meng Ge, Zeyang Song, and Haizhou Li. 2024. SVAD: A Robust, Low-Power, and Light-Weight Voice Activity Detection with Spiking Neural Networks. In ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). I...

2024
[227]

Esin Yavuz, James Turner, and Thomas Nowotny. 2016. GeNN: a code generation framework for accelerated brain simulations.Scientific reports 6, 1 (2016), 18854

2016
[228]

Emre Yilmaz, Maaike Andringa, Sigrid Kingma, Jelske Dijkstra, Frits Van der Kuip, Hans Van de Velde, Frederik Kampstra, Jouke Algra, Henk Van den Heuvel, and David Van Leeuwen. 2016. A longitudinal bilingual Frisian-Dutch radio broadcast database designed for code-switching re...

2016
[229]

Emre Yılmaz, Ozgür Bora Gevrek, Jibin Wu, Yuxiang Chen, Xuanbo Meng, and Haizhou Li. 2020. Deep convolutional spiking neural networks for keyword spotting. In Proceedings of INTERSPEECH . 2557–2561

2020
[230]

Ruokai Yin, Abhishek Moitra, Abhiroop Bhattacharjee, Youngeun Kim, and Priyadarshini Panda. 2023. SATA: Sparsity-Aware Training Accelerator for Spiking Neural Networks. Trans. Comp.-Aided Des. Integ. Cir. Sys. 42, 6 (June 2023), 1926–1938. https: //doi.org/10.1109/TCAD.2022.3213211

2023
[231]

Zukun Yu, Jing Yang, Qin Ran, Shaobo Li, and Zhidong Su. 2024. G2T-SNN: Fusing Topological Graph and Gaussian Prior Spiking Neural Networks for Tactile Object Recognition. IEEE Sensors Journal 24, 12 (2024), 19647–19660. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2024.3397884 , Vol. 1, No. ...

2024
[232]

Silvio Zanoli, Flavio Ponzina, Tomás Teijeiro, Alexandre Levisse, and David Atienza. 2023. An Error-Based Approximation Sensing Circuit for Event-Triggered Low-Power Wearable Sensors. IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems 13, 2 (2023), 489–501. h...

2023
[233]

Friedemann Zenke and Surya Ganguli. 2018. Superspike: Supervised learning in multilayer spiking neural networks.Neural computation 30, 6 (2018), 1514–1541

2018
[234]

Anguo Zhang, Yuzhen Niu, Yueming Gao, Junyi Wu, and Zhipeng Gao. 2022. Second-order information bottleneck based spiking neural networks for sEMG recognition. Inf. Sci. 585, C (March 2022), 543–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.11.065

2022 doi
[235]

Xiangyu Zhang, Xinyu Zhou, Mengxiao Lin, and Jian Sun. 2018. Shufflenet: An extremely efficient convolutional neural network for mobile devices. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition . 6848–6856

2018
[236]

Kai Zheng, Kun Qian, Timothy Woodford, and Xinyu Zhang. 2024. NeuroRadar: A Neuromorphic Radar Sensor for Low-Power IoT Systems. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (Istanbul, Turkiye) (SenSys ’23). Association for Computing Machinery...

2024
[237]

Wei-Long Zheng, Wei Liu, Yifei Lu, Bao-Liang Lu, and Andrzej Cichocki. 2018. Emotionmeter: A multimodal framework for recognizing human emotions. IEEE transactions on cybernetics 49, 3 (2018), 1110–1122

2018
[238]

Wei-Long Zheng and Bao-Liang Lu. 2015. Investigating critical frequency bands and channels for EEG-based emotion recognition with deep neural networks. IEEE Transactions on autonomous mental development 7, 3 (2015), 162–175

2015
[239]

Yi Zhengkun and Zhang Yilei. 2017. Recognizing tactile surface roughness with a biomimetic fingertip. Neurocomput. 244, C (June 2017), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.03.025

2017 doi
[240]

Xiaokang Zhou, Wei Liang, I Kevin, Kai Wang, Hao Wang, Laurence T Yang, and Qun Jin. 2020. Deep-learning-enhanced human activity recognition for internet of healthcare things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 7, 7 (2020), 6429–6438

2020
[241]

Zhaokun Zhou, Yuesheng Zhu, Chao He, Yaowei Wang, Shuicheng YAN, Yonghong Tian, and Li Yuan. 2023. Spikformer: When Spiking Neural Network Meets Transformer. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations . https://openreview.net/ forum?id=frE4fUwz_h , Vo...

2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [63]

Meng Dong, Xuhui Huang, and Bo Xu. 2018. Unsupervised speech recognition through spike-timing-dependent plasticity in a convolutional spiking neural network. PloS one 13, 11 (2018), e0204596

2018

[2] [1]

2022. 7. Sub-mW Neuromorphic SNN Audio Processing Applications with Rockpool and Xylo . 69–78

2022

[3] [2]

DYNAP-CNN

2024. DYNAP-CNN. https://www.synsense.ai/products/dynap-cnn/. Accessed: April 2025

2024

[4] [3]

Essam Abdellatef, Rasha M Al-Makhlasawy, and Wafaa A Shalaby. 2025. Detection of human activities using multi-layer convolutional neural network. Scientific Reports 15, 1 (2025), 7004

2025

[5] [4]

MAH Akhand, MA Maria, MAS Kamal, and K Murase. [n. d.]. Improved EEG-based emotion recognition through information enhancement in connectivity feature map. Sci. Rep. 13, 13804 (2023)

2023

[6] [5]

Abeer Al-Nafjan, Khulud Alharthi, and Heba Kurdi. 2020. Lightweight building of an electroencephalogram-based emotion detection system. Brain Sciences 10, 11 (2020), 781

2020

[7] [6]

Mahmood Alsaadi, Ismail Keshta, Janjhyam Venkata Naga Ramesh, Divya Nimma, Mohammad Shabaz, Nirupma Pathak, Pavitar Parkash Singh, Sherzod Kiyosov, and Mukesh Soni. 2025. Logical reasoning for human activity recognition based on multisource data from wearable device. Scientific Reports 15, 1 (2025), 380

2025

[8] [7]

Wael Alzhrani, Maryam Doborjeh, Zohreh Doborjeh, and Nikola Kasabov. 2021. Emotion recognition and understanding using EEG data in a brain-inspired spiking neural network architecture. In 2021 international joint conference on neural networks (ijcnn) . IEEE, 1–9

2021