Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 47 references

Liouville Rigidity for Real and Complex Degenerate Hessian Equations

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The Liouville property for Hessian inclusions is characterized by a recursive geometric condition on the admissible set.

desk verdict The central iff theorem is new and the overall strategy is sound, but Definition 2.2's supersolution condition is inconsistent with the proofs and must be fixed before the main statement is trustworthy. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.21024 v1 pith:TBFXXZTR submitted 2026-07-23 math.AP math.DG

Hao Fang , Biao Ma , Jinyang Wu This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath.DG MSC 35B5335J6035D40
keywords LiouvilletheoremHessianequationsviscositysolutionsadmissiblesetsquotientreductionterminalGårdingpolynomialsmonotonerootsequence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asserts that, for translation-invariant real and complex Hessian equations, whether every bounded Hölder-continuous entire viscosity solution of $Hess_F u \in \partial A$ must be constant is fully determined by the geometry of the admissible set $A$, not by the algebraic form of the boundary equation. It introduces Liouville admissible sets: after quotienting by any proper linear subspace, the reduced boundary set must either reproduce the boundary of the reduced admissible set or collapse into a terminal set, where bounded-above subsolutions are already constant. The main theorem proves this geometric condition is equivalent to the analytic Liouville property. As a consequence, spectral (rotation-invariant) admissible sets are automatically Liouville admissible, and a large family of examples arises by polarizing univariate polynomials with monotone root sequences, recovering standard k-Hessian equations and mixed equations such as $\sigma_{n-1}+\sigma_n=0$. The upshot is that a classic rigidity question in PDEs becomes a checkable condition on the defining set.

What carries the argument

Quotient reduction of an admissible set: for a linear subspace $N$, $A/N$ is the set of forms $B$ on $V/N$ whose pullback $q_N^*B$ belongs to $A$; this transports the inclusion problem down to a lower-dimensional space. The boundary dichotomy (Proposition 3.8) says that for any proper quotient, either $\partial(A/N)=\Sigma/N$ (the boundary structure persists) or $\Sigma/N=A/N$, in which case the quotient ceases to be a genuine boundary problem. A terminal set is any admissible set for which every continuous bounded-above viscosity subsolution of $Hess_F u \in T$ is constant, with the positive semidefinite cone as the basic example and the real logarithmic cone as a larger real example. Liouville admissibility is the recursive r

What would settle it

Directly check the function $u$ in Example 2.4. At a point on the boundary $\{|x'|=1\}$ where $u = -1$, take a test function $\phi$ touching $u$ from below with $\text{Hess} \phi$ having $11$-entry $0$ and $(22+33+44)$-entry $0$, so $\text{Hess} \phi \in \partial A$. Under the literal Definition 2.2 such $\phi$ is forbidden because $\text{Hess} \phi \notin A^c$, so $u$ is not a supersolution and the example collapses; under the $Q \setminus \mathrm{int} A$ reading, $\text{Hess} \phi \notin \mathrm{int} A$ holds and $u$ qualifies. This single check decides whether the intended viscosity notion — and hence the main theorem — is the weak one used in the proofs.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim (Theorem 2.9) is the equivalence: an admissible set $A \subset Q(V)$ is Liouville admissible if and only if every bounded, globally $C^{0,\alpha}$ entire viscosity solution of the boundary inclusion $Hess_F u \in \partial A$ is constant, for any $0 < \alpha \leq 1$. Here 'admissible' means a closed convex subset of the space of real symmetric (or Hermitian) forms that contains 0, is closed under adding positive semidefinite forms, and lies in a half-space of positive trace. A set is Liouville admissible if for every nonzero proper linear subspace $N$, the quotient set $A/N$ either has boundary coinciding with the reduced boundary ($\partial(A/N) = \Sigma/N$) or is contained in a terminal set — a set for which every bounded-abov

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a viscosity supersolution of the inclusion $Hess_F u \in \partial A$ is defined by requiring every test function's Hessian to lie outside the interior of $A$ ($Q \setminus \mathrm{int} A$); if one instead enforces the literal complement $A^c$ as written in Definition 2.2, then solutions touching the boundary cease to be supersolutions and both the example and the converse direction unravel.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the main theorem is correct, then verifying a Liouville theorem for any translation-invariant Hessian inclusion reduces to checking a recursive, purely linear-algebraic condition on quotient sets.
  • Every spectral (orthogonally or unitarily invariant) admissible set — including the cones for the Laplace, k-Hessian, and Monge–Ampère equations — is automatically Liouville admissible, so rigidity holds for the associated boundary equation.
  • The framework recovers earlier Liouville theorems for complex k-Hessian equations and for the critical LYZ-type equation σ_{n−1}+σ_n=0 without requiring gradient bounds beyond bounded C^{0,α} regularity.
  • Polarization of univariate Gårding polynomials satisfying the monotone root sequence condition yields a supply of new Liouville-rigid equations, including non-stable examples not obtainable from real-stable polynomials.
  • Liouville admissibility is closed under finite intersections and linear pullbacks, so anisotropic (non-spectral) rigid equations can be produced by combining multiple admissible sets.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same recursive quotient-dichotomy may apply to other translation-invariant subequation inclusions beyond Hessian ones, as long as the equation class admits a restriction/quotient calculus and a terminal-set classification; the paper's argument uses only convexity, ellipticity, and mollification, not the special form of the Hessian.
  • The viscosity-solution wording in Definition 2.2 appears inconsistent with the proofs: supersolutions are actually used with the condition Hess φ ∉ int A (i.e., Q \ int A), not the literal Hess φ ∈ A^c = Q \ A. Under the literal complement, a smooth function with Hessian exactly on ∂A would not be a supersolution, and the converse construction in Proposition 7.3 would not produce a viscosity solut
  • The identification of maximal spectral terminal sets (positive semidefinite cone in the complex case, the real logarithmic cone in the real case) suggests that the class of terminal sets — and therefore of Liouville admissible sets — may be larger than the paper's examples; any sharp characterization of terminal sets in the non-spectral case would tighten the condition.
  • For non-spectral admissible sets built as finite intersections of pullbacks of spectral sets (as in Appendix B), the theorem predicts exact rigidity; one could attempt to construct explicit nonconstant bounded solutions when one of the terminal-containment hypotheses is dropped, which would delineate the boundary of the condition.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies entire viscosity solutions of translation-invariant Hessian inclusions Hess_F u ∈ ∂A, where A is a closed convex elliptic subset of the space of symmetric/Hermitian forms. It introduces quotient reductions A/N and defines a set A to be Liouville admissible if every quotient is either boundary-compatible or contained in a terminal set. Theorem 2.9 asserts that A is Liouville admissible if and only if every bounded globally C^{0,α} entire viscosity solution of Hess_F u ∈ ∂A is constant. The forward direction is proved by dimension induction (Prop. 7.1, Thm. 7.2); the converse is proved by constructing a nonconstant smooth pullback from a nonterminal quotient (Prop. 7.3). Spectral admissible sets are shown to be Liouville admissible (Thm. 3.12), and polarizations of univariate Gårding polynomials satisfying the monotone root sequence condition are used to produce classes of examples, including k-Hessian cones and Fu–Yau–Zhang's σ_{n-1}+σ_n equation. Appendices discuss maximal spectral terminal cones and anisotropic examples.

Significance. The proposed geometric characterization is attractive and, if the technical inconsistencies are repaired, would provide a genuine unification of known Liouville theorems (Dinew–Kołodziej, Székelyhidi, Fu–Yau–Zhang) and a systematic source of new anisotropic examples. The paper is transparent about dependencies: the Gårding polarization input is quoted from the authors' preprints [13,14], but the main equivalence is proved from viscosity theory and does not fit the examples to the theorem; there are no fitted parameters. The proof structure is coherent and substantial. However, the manuscript's central definition of viscosity solution is internally inconsistent, and the Gårding cone used for the examples is left open/closed ambiguous; these issues must be fixed before the main theorem is acceptable. No circularity was detected.

major comments (2)
  1. [Definition 2.2; (P1), (P6), (P9), Prop. 7.3] Definition 2.2's supersolution clause (A^c) conflicts with every proof in the paper. (P1) proves a C² function w with Hess w∈Σ is a supersolution by showing Hess φ∉int A, i.e. the condition Q(V)\int A; literally, taking φ=w gives Hess φ∈∂A⊂A, not A^c. (P6) and (P9) also use Q(V)\A. The converse (Prop. 7.3) constructs q_N^*[u]_ε, a smooth bounded function with Hessian in Σ; under the literal A^c definition this is not a supersolution, so the 'only if' direction fails. The intended condition is evidently Q(V)\int A; Definition 2.2 and the comparison/restriction proofs must be corrected and re-verified with that definition. This ambiguity affects both directions of Theorem 2.9.
  2. [Section 4, Theorem 4.4 and Remark 4.5] The Gårding component C_g from Theorem 4.3 is the unique connected component of {g>0}, hence open, but Theorem 4.4 asserts A_g={λ:λ∈C_g} is closed, as required by Definition 2.1, and the proof uses 'C_g is closed' and '0∈∂C_g'. The inequalities in Remark 4.5 are strict. Example 4.6 silently switches to the closed k-Hessian cone. The authors should define A_g as the spectral lift of the closure of C_g, prove that the closure is admissible, and state the boundary equation with the corresponding non-strict inequalities; otherwise Theorem 1.3 is not formulated for admissible sets.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Definition 2.2] The notation A^c should be defined explicitly as the complement in Q(V), and the intended supersolution condition (Q(V)\int A vs. Q(V)\A) should be stated unambiguously.
  2. [Example 2.4] The example is only piecewise C²; the text asserts u_{11}≡0 and concludes D²u∈Σ without verifying the viscosity conditions at |x'|=1. A short viscosity verification or a smooth approximation would make the example rigorous.
  3. [Proposition 6.1, (P5)] The sentence 'because w is subharmonic, [w]_ε ≥ w' should specify that subharmonicity is with respect to the metric g and follows from (A2) and (A4).
  4. [Theorem 3.12 and Section 3.4] The relationship between the metric g used for spectrality and the metric h in (A4) deserves a clearer statement; the proof appears to use h=g implicitly.
  5. [Section 4, Example 4.6] The same symbol Γ^+_k is used for both the open set {σ_1>0,...,σ_k>0} and the closed cone {σ_1≥0,...,σ_k≥0}; please distinguish these and make clear which is the admissible set.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Theorem 2.9 is derived by induction from quotient geometry and viscosity stability, with no fitted parameter or definitional reduction; self-citations affect only the example section and are dependencies, not circular inputs.

full rationale

The central if-and-only-if (Theorem 2.9) is self-contained: the forward direction uses Proposition 7.1 and the recursive quotient dichotomy to force constancy, and the converse negates Liouville admissibility, obtains a nonconstant bounded subsolution from the definition of terminal set, mollifies it, and pulls it back to a bounded C^{0,alpha} solution of Hess_F u in ∂A through the equality Σ/N = A/N. The conclusion is not used as an input at any step. The Gårding-polarization input of Section 4 is quoted from the authors' own [13,14]; this is a real dependency for the examples but the cited theorem is a parameter-free statement whose assumptions do not contain the Liouville conclusion, so under the rubric it is independent support and not circular. One issue is flagged but not scored as circularity: Definition 2.2 defines supersolutions via A^c, while (P1), (P6), and (P9) operate with Q(V) minus int A (equivalently Q(V) minus A in places); under the literal A^c reading (P1) would be false and the converse's smooth pullback would not qualify as a supersolution. This is a well-posedness/correctness gap in the written statement, not a reduction of the claim to its own inputs. No circular steps were identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central theorem is a pure-math if-and-only-if proved from viscosity theory and convex geometry. No free parameters are fitted. The paper introduces the definition of Liouville admissibility and the terminal-set taxonomy; these are new definitions, not empirical postulates. The main unstated load is the importation of Gårding polarization theory from the same authors' earlier preprints.

assumptions (7)
  • standard math Crandall-Ishii-Lions maximum principle for viscosity solutions [9]
    Used in Lemma 3.3 to pass subsolutions through quotient maps.
  • standard math Caffarelli-Cabré upper-envelope and convex-envelope estimates for fully nonlinear equations [6]
    Used in (P5) to prove sums and mollifications of subsolutions are subsolutions; Theorem 5.4 and 5.5 are cited rather than proved.
  • standard math Cartan's lemma on asymptotic density of exceptional sets for bounded subharmonic functions [11,27]
    Used in Corollary 5.2 and in Proposition 7.1 Case 2 to get [w]_β(0)→1 and [w²]_r(0)→1.
  • standard math Harvey-Lawson restriction theorem [26]
    Used in Proposition 2.6 to prove the positive cone is terminal.
  • standard math Davis's convexity theorem for spectral sets [10]
    Used in Theorem 4.4 to conclude spectral lifts of convex permutation-invariant cones are convex.
  • domain assumption Gårding polarization theorem: MRS univariate polynomials polarize to Gårding polynomials with a convex PRT component [13,14]
    Theorem 4.3 is imported from the authors' own unpublished preprints; Theorem 1.3/4.4 and the 'full class' Remark 1.4 rest on it.
  • domain assumption MRS condition (monotone root sequence) is the right algebraic input [37,38,13]
    Theorem 1.3 assumes f satisfies (3)-(4); Remark 1.4 claims necessity via [13].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Liouville Rigidity for Real and Complex Degenerate Hessian Equations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TBFXXZTR

@misc{pith2026260721024,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Liouville Rigidity for Real and Complex Degenerate Hessian Equations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TBFXXZTR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.21024}
}
abstract

We prove Liouville rigidity theorems for translation-invariant real and complex Hessian equations in the viscosity sense, where the PDE is encoded by an admissible set $\mathcal{A}$. The main structural notion is Liouville admissibility, a recursive geometric condition requiring each quotient set to be either boundary compatible or to fall into a terminal class. Our main theorem states that every bounded, globally $C^{0,\alpha}$ entire viscosity solution of \[ \mathrm{Hess}_{\mathbb F}u\in\partial\mathcal{A} \] is constant if and only if $\mathcal{A}$ is Liouville admissible; thus the Liouville-type property is characterized as a geometric property of the admissible set. A central class of examples arises from polarizations of univariate G{\aa}rding polynomials satisfying the monotone root sequence condition, producing mixed elementary-symmetric admissible sets and recovering the standard $k$-Hessian equations as monomial cases. The framework also allows anisotropic constructions, including linear pullbacks and intersections of admissible sets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Fundamental solutions of homogeneous fully nonlinear elliptic equations

    Scott N. Armstrong, Boyan Sirakov, and Charles K. Smart. “Fundamental solutions of homogeneous fully nonlinear elliptic equations”. In:Comm. Pure Appl. Math.64.6 (2011), pp. 737–777.doi:10.1002/cpa.20360

    work page doi:10.1002/cpa.20360 2011

  2. [2]

    Liouville property and regularity of a Hessian quotient equation

    Jiguang Bao et al. “Liouville property and regularity of a Hessian quotient equation”. In:Amer. J. Math.125.2 (2003), pp. 301–316

    2003

  3. [3]

    The Dirichlet problem for nonlin- ear second-order elliptic equations. I. Monge-Ampère equation

    L. Caffarelli, L. Nirenberg, and J. Spruck. “The Dirichlet problem for nonlin- ear second-order elliptic equations. I. Monge-Ampère equation”. In:Comm. Pure Appl. Math.37.3 (1984), pp. 369–402.doi:10.1002/cpa.3160370306

    doi:10.1002/cpa.3160370306 1984

  4. [4]

    The Dirichlet problem for non- linear second-order elliptic equations. III. Functions of the eigenvalues of the Hessian

    L. Caffarelli, L. Nirenberg, and J. Spruck. “The Dirichlet problem for non- linear second-order elliptic equations. III. Functions of the eigenvalues of the Hessian”. In:Acta Math.155.3-4 (1985), pp. 261–301.doi:10 . 1007 / BF02392544. 32 REFERENCES

    1985

  5. [5]

    The Dirichlet problem for nonlinear second-order elliptic equations. II. Complex Monge-Ampère, and uniformly elliptic, equations

    L. Caffarelli et al. “The Dirichlet problem for nonlinear second-order elliptic equations. II. Complex Monge-Ampère, and uniformly elliptic, equations”. In:Comm. Pure Appl. Math.38.2 (1985), pp. 209–252.doi:10.1002/cpa. 3160380206

    doi:10.1002/cpa 1985

  6. [6]

    Caffarelli and Xavier Cabré.Fully nonlinear elliptic equations

    Luis A. Caffarelli and Xavier Cabré.Fully nonlinear elliptic equations. Vol. 43. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications. American Mathe- matical Society, Providence, RI, 1995, pp. vi+104.doi:10.1090/coll/043

    doi:10.1090/coll/043 1995

  7. [7]

    A Liouville problem for the sigma- 2 equation

    Sun-Yung Alice Chang and Yu Yuan. “A Liouville problem for the sigma- 2 equation”. In:Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.28.2 (2010), pp. 659–664.doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.28.659

    work page doi:10.3934/dcds.2010.28.659 2010

  8. [8]

    BaoZhi Chu, YanYan Li, and Zongyuan Li.Liouville theorems for conformally invariant fully nonlinear equations. I. 2024. arXiv:2311.07542 [math.AP]

    arXiv 2024

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    User’s guide to viscosity solutions of second order partial differential equations

    Michael G. Crandall, Hitoshi Ishii, and Pierre-Louis Lions. “User’s guide to viscosity solutions of second order partial differential equations”. In:Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.)27.1 (1992), pp. 1–67.doi:10.1090/S0273-0979- 1992-00266-5

    1992 doi

  2. [10]

    All convex invariant functions of hermitian matrices

    Chandler Davis. “All convex invariant functions of hermitian matrices”. In: Arch. Math.8 (1957), pp. 276–278.doi:10.1007/BF01898787

    1957 doi

  3. [11]

    Liouville and Calabi-Yau type theorems for complex Hessian equations

    Sławomir Dinew and Sławomir Kołodziej. “Liouville and Calabi-Yau type theorems for complex Hessian equations”. In:Amer. J. Math.139.2 (2017), pp. 403–415.doi:10.1353/ajm.2017.0009

    2017

  4. [12]

    Onafullynonlinearellipticequationwithdifferential forms

    HaoFangandBiaoMa.“Onafullynonlinearellipticequationwithdifferential forms”. In:Adv. Math.454 (2024), Paper No. 109867, 89.doi:10.1016/j. aim.2024.109867

    2024

  5. [13]

    Gårding Polynomials

    Hao Fang and Biao Ma. “Gårding Polynomials”. In: (2026). arXiv:2604 . 27755 [math.CO]

    2026

  6. [14]

    Hao Fang and Biao Ma.Ideal Gårding polynomials. 2026. arXiv:2607.16832 [math.CO]

    2026 arXiv

  7. [15]

    The Critical LYZ Equation in Kähler Geometry

    Jixiang Fu, Shing-Tung Yau, and Dekai Zhang. “The Critical LYZ Equation in Kähler Geometry”. In: (2026). arXiv:2511.21492 [math.DG]

    2026 arXiv

  8. [16]

    TheexteriorDirichletproblem for the homogeneous complexk-Hessian equation

    ZhenghuanGao,XinanMa,andDekaiZhang.“TheexteriorDirichletproblem for the homogeneous complexk-Hessian equation”. In:Adv. Nonlinear Stud. 23.1 (2023), Paper No. 20220039, 33.doi:10.1515/ans-2022-0039

    2023 doi

  9. [17]

    Second-order estimates and regularity for fully nonlinear ellip- tic equations on Riemannian manifolds

    Bo Guan. “Second-order estimates and regularity for fully nonlinear ellip- tic equations on Riemannian manifolds”. In:Duke Math. J.163.8 (2014), pp. 1491–1524.doi:10.1215/00127094-2713591

    2014 doi

  10. [18]

    The Dirichlet problem for fully nonlinear elliptic equations on Riemannian manifolds

    Bo Guan. “The Dirichlet problem for fully nonlinear elliptic equations on Riemannian manifolds”. In:Adv. Math.415 (2023), Paper No. 108899, 32. doi:10.1016/j.aim.2023.108899

    2023

  11. [19]

    The Dirichlet problem for a complex Monge-Ampère type equation on Hermitian manifolds

    Bo Guan and Qun Li. “The Dirichlet problem for a complex Monge-Ampère type equation on Hermitian manifolds”. In:Adv. Math.246 (2013), pp. 351– 367.doi:10.1016/j.aim.2013.07.006

    2013 doi

  12. [20]

    On a class of fully nonlinear elliptic equations on Her- mitian manifolds

    Bo Guan and Wei Sun. “On a class of fully nonlinear elliptic equations on Her- mitian manifolds”. In:Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations54.1 (2015), pp. 901–916.doi:10.1007/s00526-014-0810-1

    2015 doi

  13. [21]

    A class of curvature type equations

    Pengfei Guan and Xiangwen Zhang. “A class of curvature type equations”. In:Pure Appl. Math. Q.17.3 (2021), pp. 865–907.doi:10.4310/PAMQ.2021. v17.n3.a2. REFERENCES 33

    2021 doi

  14. [22]

    Tangents to subsolutions: existence and uniqueness, Part I

    F. Reese Harvey and H. Blaine Lawson. “Tangents to subsolutions: existence and uniqueness, Part I”. In:Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. (6)27.4 (2018), pp. 777–848.doi:10.5802/afst.1583

    2018 doi

  15. [23]

    Dirichletdualityandthenonlinear Dirichlet problem

    F.ReeseHarveyandH.BlaineLawsonJr.“Dirichletdualityandthenonlinear Dirichlet problem”. In:Comm. Pure Appl. Math.62.3 (2009), pp. 396–443. doi:10.1002/cpa.20265

    2009 doi

  16. [24]

    Dirichletdualityandthenonlinear Dirichlet problem on Riemannian manifolds

    F.ReeseHarveyandH.BlaineLawsonJr.“Dirichletdualityandthenonlinear Dirichlet problem on Riemannian manifolds”. In:J. Differential Geom.88.3 (2011), pp. 395–482

    2011

  17. [26]

    The Restriction Theorem for Fully Nonlinear Subequations

    F. Reese Harvey and Jr. Lawson H. Blaine. “The Restriction Theorem for Fully Nonlinear Subequations”. In:Annales de l’Institut Fourier64.1 (2014), pp. 217–265.doi:10.5802/aif.2846

    2014 doi

  18. [27]

    W. K. Hayman and P. B. Kennedy.Subharmonic functions. Vol. I. Vol. No. 9. London Mathematical Society Monographs. Academic Press [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers], London-New York, 1976, pp. xvii+284

    1976

  19. [28]

    A second order estimate for complex Hessian equations on a compact Kähler manifold

    Zuoliang Hou, Xi-Nan Ma, and Damin Wu. “A second order estimate for complex Hessian equations on a compact Kähler manifold”. In:Math. Res. Lett.17.3 (2010), pp. 547–561.doi:10.4310/MRL.2010.v17.n3.a12

    2010 doi

  20. [29]

    Existence of entire solutions to the Monge- Ampère equation

    Huaiyu Jian and Xu-Jia Wang. “Existence of entire solutions to the Monge- Ampère equation”. In:Amer. J. Math.136.4 (2014), pp. 1093–1106.doi: 10.1353/ajm.2014.0029

    2014

  21. [30]

    A Liouville theorem for solutions of degen- erate Monge-Ampère equations

    Tianling Jin and Jingang Xiong. “A Liouville theorem for solutions of degen- erate Monge-Ampère equations”. In:Comm. Partial Differential Equations 39.2 (2014), pp. 306–320.doi:10.1080/03605302.2013.814143

    2014

  22. [31]

    Isolated singularities for fully nonlinear elliptic equations

    Denis A. Labutin. “Isolated singularities for fully nonlinear elliptic equations”. In:J. Differential Equations177.1 (2001), pp. 49–76.doi:10.1006/jdeq. 2001.3998

    2001

  23. [32]

    On some conformally invariant fully nonlinear equations

    Aobing Li and Yanyan Li. “On some conformally invariant fully nonlinear equations”. In:Comm. Pure Appl. Math.56.10 (2003), pp. 1416–1464.doi: 10.1002/cpa.10099

    2003 doi

  24. [33]

    An interior estimate for convex solutions and a rigidity theorem

    Ming Li, Changyu Ren, and Zhizhang Wang. “An interior estimate for convex solutions and a rigidity theorem”. In:J. Funct. Anal.270.7 (2016), pp. 2691– 2714.doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2016.01.008

    2016 doi

  25. [34]

    Local gradient estimates of solutions to some conformally invari- ant fully nonlinear equations

    YanYan Li. “Local gradient estimates of solutions to some conformally invari- ant fully nonlinear equations”. In:Comm. Pure Appl. Math.62.10 (2009), pp. 1293–1326.doi:10 . 1002 / cpa . 20289. arXiv, Preprint, 2006:math / 0605559v2

    2009

  26. [35]

    Symmetry, quantitative Liouville theorems and analysis of large solutions of conformally invariant fully nonlinear elliptic equations

    YanYan Li and Luc Nguyen. “Symmetry, quantitative Liouville theorems and analysis of large solutions of conformally invariant fully nonlinear elliptic equations”. In:Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations56.4 (2017), Paper No. 99, 35.doi:10.1007/s00526-017-1192-y

    2017 doi

  27. [36]

    Towards a Liouville theorem for continuousviscositysolutionstofullynonlinearellipticequationsinconformal geometry

    YanYan Li, Luc Nguyen, and Bo Wang. “Towards a Liouville theorem for continuousviscositysolutionstofullynonlinearellipticequationsinconformal geometry”. In:Geometric analysis—in honor of Gang Tian’s 60th birthday. 34 REFERENCES Vol. 333. Progr. Math. Birkhäuser/Springer, Cham,...

    2020 doi

  28. [37]

    On the convexity of general inverseσ k equations

    Chao-Ming Lin. “On the convexity of general inverseσ k equations”. In:J. Funct. Anal.285.7 (2023), Paper No. 110038, 59.doi:10 . 1016 / j . jfa . 2023.110038

    2023

  29. [38]

    Corrigendum to “On the convexity of general inverse sigma-k equations

    Chao-Ming Lin. “Corrigendum to “On the convexity of general inverse sigma-k equations” [J. Funct. Anal. 285(7) (2023) 110038]”. In:Journal of Functional Analysis286.11 (2024), p. 110398.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa. 2024.110398

    2023

  30. [39]

    The Neumann problem for Hessian equations

    Xinan Ma and Guohuan Qiu. “The Neumann problem for Hessian equations”. In:Comm. Math. Phys.366.1 (2019), pp. 1–28.doi:10.1007/s00220-019- 03339-1

    2019 doi

  31. [40]

    On uniform estimate of complex elliptic equations on closed Her- mitian manifolds

    Wei Sun. “On uniform estimate of complex elliptic equations on closed Her- mitian manifolds”. In:Commun. Pure Appl. Anal.16.5 (2017), pp. 1553–1570. doi:10.3934/cpaa.2017074

    2017 doi

  32. [41]

    Fully non-linear elliptic equations on compact Hermitian manifolds

    Gábor Székelyhidi. “Fully non-linear elliptic equations on compact Hermitian manifolds”. In:J. Differential Geom.109.2 (2018), pp. 337–378.doi:10 . 4310/jdg/1527040875

    2018

  33. [42]

    The Monge-Ampère equation for(n− 1)-plurisubharmonic functions on a compact Kähler manifold

    Valentino Tosatti and Ben Weinkove. “The Monge-Ampère equation for(n− 1)-plurisubharmonic functions on a compact Kähler manifold”. In:J. Amer. Math. Soc.30.2 (2017), pp. 311–346.doi:10.1090/jams/875

    2017 doi

  34. [43]

    On the Dirichlet problem for Hessian equations

    Neil S. Trudinger. “On the Dirichlet problem for Hessian equations”. In:Acta Math.175.2 (1995), pp. 151–164.doi:10.1007/BF02393303

    1995 doi

  35. [44]

    Hessian measures. I

    Neil S. Trudinger and Xu-Jia Wang. “Hessian measures. I”. In: vol. 10. 2. Dedicated to Olga Ladyzhenskaya. 1997, pp. 225–239.doi:10.12775/TMNA. 1997.030

    1997 doi

  36. [45]

    Hessian measures. II

    Neil S. Trudinger and Xu-Jia Wang. “Hessian measures. II”. In:Ann. of Math. (2)150.2 (1999), pp. 579–604.doi:10.2307/121089

    1999 doi

  37. [46]

    Hessian measures. III

    Neil S. Trudinger and Xu-Jia Wang. “Hessian measures. III”. In:J. Funct. Anal.193.1 (2002), pp. 1–23.doi:10.1006/jfan.2001.3925

    2002

  38. [47]

    A class of fully nonlinear elliptic equations and related func- tionals

    Xu Jia Wang. “A class of fully nonlinear elliptic equations and related func- tionals”. In:Indiana Univ. Math. J.43.1 (1994), pp. 25–54.doi:10.1512/ iumj.1994.43.43002

    1994

  39. [48]

    Hessian equations on closed Hermitian manifolds

    Dekai Zhang. “Hessian equations on closed Hermitian manifolds”. In:Pacific J. Math.291.2 (2017), pp. 485–510.doi:10.2140/pjm.2017.291.485. Email address:hao-fang@uiowa.edu Department of Mathematics, University of Iow a, Iow a City, IA 52246, USA Email address:bma@math.ecnu.edu...

    2017 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.