Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 38 references

The unusual spectrum of the X-ray transient source XRISM J174610.8-290021 near the Galactic center

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that XRISM J174610.8−290021, an X-ray transient near the Galactic center, is an intrinsically bright neutron-star low-mass X-ray binary seen only through scattered light from a photoionized disk corona, not a magnetic…

desk verdict A genuinely new GC transient with an unusual Fe line ratio and a solid mCV exclusion, but the 10^37 erg/s intrinsic luminosity rests on an internally inconsistent blackbody-area scaling; worth publishing after revision. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.20088 v1 pith:TBOQUILL submitted 2025-06-25 astro-ph.HE

A. Yoshimoto , S. Yamauchi , M. Nobukawa , H. Uchiyama , K. K. Nobukawa , Y. Aoki , M. Ishida , Y. Kanemaru
show 15 more authors
M. Shidatsu T. Hayashi Y. Maeda H. Matsumoto Y. Tsuboi H. Suzuki H. Nakajima Q. D. Wang S. Eguchi T. Yoneyama T. Dotani E. Behar Y. Terada N. Suzuki M. Yoshimoto
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords GalacticcenterX-raytransientslow-massbinariesphotoionizedplasmaironemissionlinesneutronstarsaccretiondiskcoronaXRISM
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

During 2024 performance-verification observations of the Galactic center with XRISM/Xtend, a point-like X-ray transient appeared in February–March and faded below detection six months later. The paper argues that this source, XRISM J174610.8−290021, is not the magnetic cataclysmic variable its hard spectrum and $\sim 10^{35}$ erg s$^{-1}$ luminosity superficially suggest, but a neutron-star low-mass X-ray binary that is intrinsically about a hundred times brighter and is seen only through scattered light. The decisive anomaly is the iron-line ratio: hydrogen-like Fe XXVI-Ly$\alpha$ at 6.97 keV is about four times stronger than helium-like Fe XXV-He$\alpha$ at 6.7 keV, which a single-temperature thermal plasma cannot produce consistently. The proposed resolution is that a highly inclined accretion disk hides the neutron star, and what we see is emission scattered by photoionized plasma with ionization parameter $\log \xi \sim 5$ above the disk. If this reading is right, the object demonstrates an edge-on viewing mode of accreting neutron stars and a way that luminous sources can masquerade as faint ones.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is the proposed geometry: a neutron star hidden by a nearly edge-on accretion disk, with photoionized plasma above the disk scattering X-rays toward the observer. The quantitative machinery consists of the ionization parameter $\xi = L_X/(n_e R^2)$ (with $\log \xi \gtrsim 4.4$ needed for Fe XXVI-Ly$\alpha$ to dominate, and $\log \xi \sim 5$ inferred), the measured blackbody radius $R_{\rm bb} = 0.33$ km, and the Shimura–Takahara color-to-effective temperature correction that turns the 1.6 keV color temperature into a full-surface luminosity estimate of $10^{37}$ erg s$^{-1}$. The argument also leans on the line-ratio mismatch—ionization temperature $\sim 30$ keV versus electron temperature $\sim 7$ keV—as the diagnostic that rules out thermal collisional plasma and motivates the photoionized scattering picture.

What would settle it

A high-resolution spectrum taken during a future bright state would settle the photoionization claim: the model predicts narrow, Fe XXVI-Ly$\alpha$-dominated lines with $\log \xi \gtrsim 4.4$ and no accompanying thermal Fe XXV dominance, while a thermal-plasma alternative requires matched line widths and a $\sim 7$ keV temperature; catching an X-ray burst from the neutron-star surface through the supposed occulting disk would directly contradict the hidden-NS geometry.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that XRISM J174610.8−290021 is an intrinsically luminous neutron-star low-mass X-ray binary, with $\sim 10^{37}$ erg s$^{-1}$ in the 2–10 keV band, observed through a scattering screen rather than directly. Two NS-LMXB spectral models—disk blackbody plus blackbody, and a Comptonized model with blackbody seed photons—reproduce the continuum well, whereas the magnetic-CV post-shock column model cannot fit continuum and iron lines together. The fitted blackbody emission radius is $0.33$ km, far smaller than a neutron star; scaling to a full $10$ km surface with the Shimura and Takahara (1995) color-to-effective temperature correction raises the intrinsic luminosity two orders of magnitude above the observed value. The observed Fe XXVI-Ly$\alpha$/Fe XXV-He$\alpha$ intensity ratio of $4^{+5}_{-2}$ gives an ionization temperature near 30 keV while the bremsstrahlung electron temperature is only about 7 keV, and a photoionized plasma with $\log \xi > 4.4$ reproduces the iron lines. The authors therefore propose that the disk is seen at high inclination, the direct neutron-star emission is blocked, and only scattered emission from the photoionized accretion-disk corona reaches the observer; the marginal 1537 s periodicity is consistent with a short-period LMXB but not secure.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the fitted $0.33$ km blackbody component represents radiation from a representative fraction of a uniformly emitting $10$ km neutron-star surface, so scaling it up gives the true $10^{37}$ erg s$^{-1}$ luminosity; if that region is instead a small hotspot, boundary layer, or non-uniform patch, the source could be intrinsically faint and the high-inclination scattered-light geometry would not be required.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the classification is correct, some Galactic-center transients that appear to be faint ($\sim 10^{35}$ erg s$^{-1}$) hard X-ray sources may actually be luminous NS-LMXBs whose apparent luminosity is suppressed by edge-on viewing.
  • A hydrogen-dominated iron-line ratio does not by itself require a $\sim 30$ keV plasma; photoionized gas with $\log \xi \sim 10^5$ can produce it, so such ratios should be read as ionization diagnostics rather than temperature diagnostics.
  • The source class is unlikely to contribute significantly to the unresolved Galactic-center X-ray emission, because the scattered-light viewing geometry that reveals it is rare.
  • If the 1537 s periodicity is real, the object belongs at the short end of the known LMXB orbital-period distribution.
  • Wide-field X-ray instruments that can measure iron-line equivalent widths should find more low-luminosity, strongly lined sources, and those could account for part of the unresolved Galactic-center emission.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication the authors leave implicit: in this geometry the scattered component should lag the hidden source's variability by a light-crossing time of the disk corona; timed monitoring of continuum versus Fe XXVI line could test the scattering site.
  • A testable extension: if the 5.9 keV feature is real Cr XXIV-Ly$\alpha$ and appears only in the high phase, a higher-resolution spectrum could tie it to the same photoionized structure or rule it out as an artifact.
  • A population-level extension the paper does not quantify: simulate an ensemble of edge-on NS-LMXBs to estimate how many would appear as faint, strongly Fe-lined transients and what fraction of the unresolved Galactic-center emission they could hide.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports the discovery of a transient point-like X-ray source, XRISM J174610.8−290021, in XRISM/Xtend observations of the Galactic center. The source was bright in 2024 February–March, varied by more than an order of magnitude on a week timescale, and faded below detection by August 2024. The 2–10 keV spectrum is absorbed, shows a thermal continuum with kT ~ 7 keV, and contains Fe XXV-Heα and Fe XXVI-Lyα lines with an intensity ratio of about 4 in favor of the hydrogen-like line, plus a marginal 5.9 keV feature. The authors test phenomenological and physical models, find that a magnetic-CV model (ACRAD) fails while NS-LMXB models (diskbb+bbodyrad and compPS with a blackbody seed) fit well, and propose that the source is an intrinsically luminous (~10^37 erg/s) NS-LMXB viewed at high inclination through a scattering photoionized corona; they also discuss a possible contribution of such transients to the Galactic center X-ray emission.

Significance. If the interpretation were secure, the source would be a rare example of an obscured NS-LMXB with a photoionized corona, and its transient nature would add to the population of faint hard X-ray sources near the Galactic center. The detection, light curve, and line measurements are solid, and the paper is careful with background subtraction and model comparisons, explicitly flagging the marginal periodicity and the 3σ 5.9 keV line. However, the central claim depends on a luminosity-scaling step that is in tension with the proposed geometry, so the significance of the classification is currently limited; the paper is most valuable as a detailed report of an unusual transient spectrum.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.1 and Table 5] The intrinsic luminosity of 10^37 erg/s is derived from the fitted blackbody radius R_bb = 0.33 km by assuming that this radius is the visible fraction of a uniformly emitting neutron-star surface and scaling to a ~10 km star with the Shimura & Takahara color correction. This scaling is inconsistent with the proposed geometry: if the neutron star is hidden behind the accretion disk and only scattered emission is seen, the bbodyrad normalization fitted to the observed spectrum is a phenomenological representation of the scattered continuum, not the projected area of the neutron-star surface; applying a surface-area scaling therefore double-counts the obscuration. If, instead, the blackbody is taken literally as a small emission region (a boundary layer or hot spot), the observed luminosity is ~10^35 erg/s at 8 kpc, and the high-inclination, intrinsically bright scenario is not required. Since the classification as a hidden, intrinsically luminous NS-LMXB rests on this step, the central claim needs to be either supported by an independent argument or revised to present the obscured-bright-source interpretation as one of several possible geometries.
  2. [§4.1] The photoionization-model test with photemis is presented as confirmation that a plasma with log ξ > 4.4 (or ξ ~ 10^5) explains the unusual iron-line ratio, but this is a consistency check rather than an independent validation of the 10^37 erg/s luminosity. The model is fitted to the same spectrum whose iron lines are being explained, and ξ is a free parameter of the fit; no calculation is shown that links the assumed L_int = 10^37 erg/s, the electron density, and the distance R through ξ = L/(n_e R^2). As a result, the photemis fit does not independently confirm the high-luminosity, obscured geometry. The paper should either provide the density and distance estimates that connect the fitted ξ to the proposed geometry or soften the claim to 'consistent with' rather than 'explains'.
  3. [§3.3.2] The conclusion that the source is unlikely to be a magnetic CV is based on the failure of a single model implementation, ACRAD (Hayashi & Ishida 2014a), which is designed for intermediate polars with a specific post-shock column structure. The observed luminosity of ~10^35 erg/s, the thermal continuum, and the presence of iron K lines are all properties seen in magnetic CV populations, so the fit failure of this one model does not exclude all mCV classes, particularly polars or systems with different accretion geometries. The classification as an NS-LMXB would be strengthened by testing additional mCV spectral models or by identifying a more distinctive observable signature that separates the two classes.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4.3] The text states that the source has an intrinsic X-ray luminosity of 1 × 10^38 erg/s, which is inconsistent with the 10^37 erg/s quoted in the Abstract, §4.1, and the Conclusions; this should be corrected.
  2. [§3.2 and §4.1] There are several typographical errors: 'discribed' in §3.2, 'ecxplained' in §4.1, 'Althoug' in §4.2, and 'bremsstrahluhg' in the Figure 5 caption; these should be fixed.
  3. [§3.1] The citation 'A Tel#16481 (Reynolds et al. 2024)' is informal; please provide a proper reference to the Astronomer's Telegram or explain the convention used.
  4. [Table 6] The upper limit for the He-like iron line intensity in the low phase is given as '0.02 (< 0.55)' without units; for consistency with Table 4, the units of 10^-5 photons cm^-2 s^-1 should be stated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Observational analysis with no circular derivation; the central luminosity estimate is a transparent rescaling of a fitted blackbody radius, not an independent prediction.

full rationale

This paper is an observational spectral analysis, not a derivation from first principles. The central claim is that the source is an intrinsically bright NS-LMXB seen through scattered light. The only quantity styled as a 'prediction' is the intrinsic luminosity of about 10^37 erg/s, which is computed by rescaling the fitted blackbody radius R_bb = 0.33 km to a 10 km neutron star using the Shimura and Takahara (1995) color-to-effective temperature correction. This is a deterministic function of the fitted R_bb with assumed distance, NS radius, and color-correction factor, so it is an extrapolation rather than an independent confirmation. However, the paper explicitly labels the step as an assumption, stating 'We estimate the intrinsic luminosity by assuming that the blackbody emission originates from the whole surface of the NS,' and it does not feed back into the spectral fitting or into the model comparison that establishes the NS-LMXB classification. The exclusion of the mCV alternative rests on the applied Hayashi and Ishida (2014a) ACRAD model, on the fitted bremsstrahlung temperature of about 7 keV, and on the absence of Fe I-Kα; although Hayashi and Ishida are co-authors of the present paper, the cited model is an externally published, falsifiable spectral model, so the self-citation is not load-bearing circularity. The photoionized plasma interpretation is tested by fitting a photemis model to the same spectrum with a free ionization parameter, yielding log(ξ) > 4.4; this is a post-hoc consistency check, not a prediction that is independent of the data. The alternative interpretation that R_bb represents a hot spot or boundary layer rather than a fraction of the NS surface is a physical degeneracy and an interpretive risk, but it is not a circular reduction: no equation in the paper is equivalent to its inputs by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as an independent prediction in a way that validates the model. The self-citations to earlier work on the Galactic center X-ray emission are contextual rather than load-bearing. The paper's central classification is therefore self-contained against the Xtend spectrum, and no significant circularity is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim depends on standard spectral fit parameters (N_H, temperatures, line intensities, R_bb) and on two structural assumptions: the 8 kpc distance and the whole-surface blackbody scaling that produces the 10^37 erg/s intrinsic luminosity. The photoionized corona is a postulated component with no independent falsifiable handle in this paper.

free parameters (6)
  • Blackbody area R_bb = 0.33 (+0.03/-0.05) km at 8 kpc
    Fitted from the bbodyrad component; its small value is the basis for the claim that only a fraction of the NS surface is seen.
  • Blackbody color temperature kT_bb = 1.59-1.60 keV
    Fitted; combined with the assumed color-to-effective temperature correction (Shimura & Takahara 1995) it sets the 10^37 erg/s intrinsic luminosity scale.
  • Fe XXVI-Lyalpha / Fe XXV-Healpha line intensity ratio = 4 (+5/-2) in bremsstrahlung fit; 4 (+8/-2) in NS-LMXB fit
    Fitted Gaussian intensities; the anomalous ratio is the key observable that motivates the photoionization scenario.
  • Ionization parameter log(xi) = > 4.4 (quoted as ~10^5)
    Fitted with the photemis model to match the iron line structure; not predicted from first principles.
  • Chromium abundance for the 5.9 keV line = 60 solar
    Ad hoc value required to reproduce a 3-sigma line-like feature; the authors call this too large and peculiar.
  • Hydrogen column density N_H = 13.0-20.9 x 10^22 cm^-2 depending on model
    Fitted absorption; used to argue the source lies at or beyond the Galactic center.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The source is at the Galactic center distance of 8 kpc with zero redshift.
    Stated in Section 1; all luminosities, radii, and the inferred intrinsic luminosity scale as the square of the assumed distance.
  • domain assumption The blackbody component originates from the whole neutron star surface, isotropically, with a radius of about 10 km and a color-to-effective temperature correction from Shimura & Takahara (1995).
    Section 4.1; this is the step that converts the fitted 0.33 km area into an intrinsic luminosity of 10^37 erg/s. If the emitting region is a small hot spot rather than a fraction of the whole surface, the intrinsic luminosity and the need for a disk-hidden geometry disappear.
  • domain assumption The XSTAR/warmabs photemis model with default population files and a power-law ionizing spectrum of photon index 2 describes the photoionized plasma that produces the iron lines.
    Section 4.1; the reproduction of the Fe XXVI/Fe XXV ratio with log(xi) > 4.4 depends on this assumed ionizing continuum and on fixing the iron abundance to 1.5 solar.
  • domain assumption The background regions properly remove the Galactic center X-ray emission and the bright transient AX J1745.6-2901 contamination.
    Section 3.2; errors in the background subtraction would directly alter the measured iron line intensities and the continuum shape.
invented entities (1)
  • Photoionized accretion disk corona (scattering plasma)
    purpose: To explain the anomalously strong Fe XXVI-Lyalpha line and to provide the scattered light through which the hidden neutron star is observed.
    The photemis model is fitted to the same spectrum that motivated it; no independent observation (e.g., a predicted absorption line or a specific variability signature) is presented that could confirm the plasma outside this dataset.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The unusual spectrum of the X-ray transient source XRISM J174610.8-290021 near the Galactic center." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TBOQUILL

@misc{pith2026250620088,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The unusual spectrum of the X-ray transient source XRISM J174610.8-290021 near the Galactic center},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TBOQUILL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.20088}
}
abstract

The Galactic center region was observed with the XRISM X-ray observatory during the performance verification phase in 2024 and a point-like X-ray source was detected with the X-ray imager Xtend at a position of (RA, Dec)=(17h46m10.8s, -29{\deg}00'21''), which is thus named XRISM J174610.8-290021. This source was bright in February to March and showed time variations in count rate by more than one order of magnitude in one week. The 2-10 keV X-ray luminosity was ~$10^{35}$ erg/s for the assumed distance of 8 kpc. However, after six months, it was below the detection limit. We found a hint of periodicity of 1537 s from timing analysis. The XRISM/Xtend spectrum has emission lines from helium-like iron (Fe He$\alpha$) at 6.7 keV and hydrogen-like iron (Fe Ly$\alpha$) at 6.97 keV; their intensity ratio is unusual with the latter being four times stronger than the former. If the emission is of thermal origin, the ionization temperature estimated from the iron-line intensity ratio is ~30 keV, which is inconsistent with the electron temperature estimated from the thermal bremsstrahlung, ~7 keV. Spectral models of magnetic cataclysmic variables, which are often seen in the Galactic center in this luminosity range, are found to fail to reproduce the obtained spectrum. By contrast, we found that the spectrum is well reproduced with the models of low-mass X-ray binaries containing a neutron star plus two narrow Gaussian lines. We consider that the source is intrinsically bright reaching $10^{37}$ erg/s, but is blocked from direct view due to a high inclination and only the scattered emission is visible. The photoionized plasma above the accretion disk with an ionization parameter of ~$10^{5}$ may explain the unusual iron line ratio. We further discuss the potential contribution of point sources of the type of XRISM J174610.8-290021 to the diffuse Galactic center X-ray emission.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.20088 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Xtend images of the GC in the energy range of 2–10 keV. The color bar shows surface brightness in counts s−1 pixel−1 on a logarithmic scale (1 pixel = 1.8 arcsec). Upper-left, upper-right, lower-left, and lower-right panels show those of the observations from 2024 February 26 (ObsID: 300044010, GC1), 2024 February 29 (ObsID: 300045010, GC2-1), 2024 August 23 (ObsID: 300045020, GC2-2), and 2024 August 28 (ObsID: 3000… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. shows the 2–10 keV background-subtracted light curve in GC1 and GC2-1, where the source was significantly detected. Hereafter, we subtracted the background by using the light curve of the background region. The source clearly shows time variability in the count rates by more than one order of magnitude in one week. Fast variation on time scale of ∼ 10 minutes is also seen, 0 105 2×105 3×105 4×105 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 Cou… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Searching results for periodicities of XRISM J174610.8−290021 in the 2–10 keV band. Left panel: The result of epoch-folding search for a maximum chi-square for periods around 1537 s. The search is performed for 128 periods with a step of 1.0 s. Right panel: Folded light curve for the best-estimated period of 1537 s for two complete cycles. The red and gray shadows indicate the boundaries of the phases (high phase fo… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Folded light curves in the high (2–5 keV) and low (5–10 keV) energy bands and its hardness ratio for the period of 1537 s. Alt text: Three line graphs. would be 1.2%. Thus, the significance of the peak is marginal, and we should interpret it as just a hint of periodici…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Results of the spectral fitting with the phenomenological models. In the top panel, crosses are the data points, and the histogram is the best-fit model composed of thermal bremsstrahlung with photoelectric ab￾sorption plus two narrow Gaussian lines. The dotted lines s…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Xtend spectrum (in crosses) of XRISM J174610.8−290021 with the best-fit model and fitting residuals (in the lower panels). Histograms in the upper panels show the best-fit models, and dotted lines do their individual components. The applied models are (Left panel) a mC…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Phase-dependent spectra of XRISM J174610.8−290021. The no￾tations are the same as in figure 6. The model is a Comptonized spectral model assuming blackbody for the seed photon source with photoelectric absorption plus two narrow Gaussian lines (the same as in the right…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Proposed geometry of XRISM J174610.8−290021. The system should be an NS-LMXB (see text). Dashed-line arrows show the path of X-rays to the observer. Alt text: A schematic view showing the position of the neutron star, photoionized plasma, and the observer. disk and a b…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Arnaud, K. A. 1996, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V , eds. Jacoby G. and Barnes J., 17, ASP Conf. Series volume 101

    work page 1996

  2. [2]

    1999, ApJS, 120, 277

    Ezuka, H., & Ishida, M. 1999, ApJS, 120, 277

    work page 1999

  3. [3]

    2024, A Tel, 16642 Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan (2024), Vol

    Degnaar, N., et al. 2024, A Tel, 16642 Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan (2024), Vol. 00, No. 0 11

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    2002, Accretion Power in Astr ophysics (England: Cambridge Univ Pr)

    Frank, J., King, A., & Raine, D. 2002, Accretion Power in Astr ophysics (England: Cambridge Univ Pr)

    work page 2002

  5. [5]

    1997, ApJ, 485, 2, L87-L90

    Dotani, T., et al. 1997, ApJ, 485, 2, L87-L90

    work page 1997

  6. [6]

    Iaria, R., Di Salvo, T., D’Aì, A., Burderi, L., Mineo, T., Rig gio, A., Papitto, A., & Robba, N. R. 2013, A&A, 549, A33

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    1991, PhD thesis, University of Tokyo

    Ishida, M. 1991, PhD thesis, University of Tokyo

    work page 1991

  8. [8]

    2022, Proc

    Ishisaki, Y ., et al. 2022, Proc. SPIE, 12181, 121811S

    work page 2022

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    R., Palmeri, P ., Bautista, M

    Kallman, T. R., Palmeri, P ., Bautista, M. A., Mendoza, C., & K rolik, J. H. 2004, ApJS, 155, 675

    2004

  2. [10]

    R., et al

    Kallman, T. R., et al. 2019, ApJ, 874, 51

    2019

  3. [11]

    2024, Proc

    Kanemaru, Y . 2024, Proc. SPIE, 13093, 130935V

    2024

  4. [12]

    2007, PASJ, 59, S245

    Koyama, K., et al. 2007, PASJ, 59, S245

    2007

  5. [13]

    Kubota, A., & Makishima, K., 2004, ApJ, 601, 1, 428-438

    2004

  6. [14]

    Lewin, W. H. G., van Paradijs, J., & van den Heuvel, E. P . J. ed. 1995, X-ray Binaries (England: Cambridge Univ Pr), 126

    1995

  7. [15]

    2022, Proc

    Mori, K., et al. 2022, Proc. SPIE, 12181, 121811T

    2022

  8. [16]

    P ., et al

    Muno, M. P ., et al. 2004, ApJ, 613, 1179

    2004

  9. [17]

    P ., et al

    Muno, M. P ., et al. 2006, ApJS, 165,173

    2006

  10. [18]

    1984, PASJ, 36, 741

    Mitsuda, K., et al. 1984, PASJ, 36, 741

    1984

  11. [19]

    1989, PASJ, 41, 97

    Mitsuda, K., Inoue, H., Nakamura, N., & Tanaka, Y . 1989, PASJ, 41, 97

    1989

  12. [20]

    K., Y amauchi, S., & Koyama, K

    Nobukawa, M., Uchiyama, H., Nobukawa, K. K., Y amauchi, S., & Koyama, K. 2016, ApJ, 833, 268

    2016

  13. [21]

    2025, PASJaccepted, arXiv:2502.08030

    Noda, H., et al. 2025, PASJaccepted, arXiv:2502.08030

    2025 arXiv

  14. [22]

    A., Wojtowicz, D

    Pastor-Marazuela, I., Webb, N. A., Wojtowicz, D. T., & Leeuw en, J. van 2020, A&A, 640, A124

    2020

  15. [23]

    G., Sazonov, S., Gilfanov, M., Churazov, E., & Sunyaev, R

    Revnivtsev, M. G., Sazonov, S., Gilfanov, M., Churazov, E., & Sunyaev, R. 2006, A&A, 452, 1, 169

    2006

  16. [24]

    G., Vikhlinin, A., & Sazonov, S

    Revnivtsev, M. G., Vikhlinin, A., & Sazonov, S. 2007, A&A, 47 3, 857

    2007

  17. [25]

    2024, A Tel, 16481

    Reynolds, M., et al. 2024, A Tel, 16481

    2024

  18. [26]

    2012, PASJ, 66, 1

    Sakurai, S., Y amada, S., Torii, S., Noda, H., Nakazawa, K., M akishima, K., & Takahashi, H. 2012, PASJ, 66, 1

    2012

  19. [27]

    2014, PASJ, 66, 1

    Sakurai, S., et al. 2014, PASJ, 66, 1

    2014

  20. [28]

    W., et al

    Shaw, A. W., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 1, 124-137

    2022

  21. [29]

    2011, PASJ, 63, SP3, S785-S801

    Shidatsu, M., et al. 2011, PASJ, 63, SP3, S785-S801

    2011

  22. [30]

    1995, ApJ, 445, 780

    Shimura, T., & Takahara, F. 1995, ApJ, 445, 780

    1995

  23. [31]

    2008, PASJ, 60, SP1, S69–S84

    Takahashi, H., et al. 2008, PASJ, 60, SP1, S69–S84

    2008

  24. [32]

    2025, PASJaccepted

    Tashiro, M., et al. 2025, PASJaccepted

    2025

  25. [33]

    B., Tucker, W

    Tarter, C. B., Tucker, W. H., & Salpeter, E. E. 1969, ApJ, 156, 943

    1969

  26. [34]

    2025, PASJaccepted, arXiv:2503.20180

    Uchida, H., et al. 2025, PASJaccepted, arXiv:2503.20180

    2025 arXiv

  27. [35]

    G., & Koyama, K

    Uchiyama, H., Nobukawa, M., Tsuru, T. G., & Koyama, K. 2013, P ASJ, 65, 1, 19

    2013

  28. [36]

    Q., Gotthelf, E

    Wang, D. Q., Gotthelf, E. V ., & Lang, C. C. 2002, Nature, 415, 1 48–150

    2002

  29. [37]

    Q., Dong, H., & Lang, C

    Wang, D. Q., Dong, H., & Lang, C. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 1, 38–54

    2006

  30. [38]

    2000, A&AS, 143, 9 Y amauchi, S., Nobukawa, K

    Wenger, M., et al. 2000, A&AS, 143, 9 Y amauchi, S., Nobukawa, K. K., Nobukawa, M., Uchiyama, H., & Koyama, K. 2016, PASJ, 68, 4 Y uasa, T., Makishima, K., & Nakazawa, K. 2012, ApJ, 753, 2, 12 9

    2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.