Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 35 references

Numerical analysis for a chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that a fully discrete finite element scheme for the chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system is well-posed, mass-conservative, and converges to weak solutions with error of order $\Delta t + \max\{h^{r_1+1}, h^{r_2+1}, h^{r_3+1}…

desk verdict Solid, substantial 2D error analysis for a new chemotaxis–Navier–Stokes scheme; the 3D claims overreach and the numerical test is invalid. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03639 v1 pith:TBTAUCXB submitted 2019-08-09 math.NA cs.NA

Abelardo Duarte-Rodríguez , María A. Rodríguez-Bellido , Diego A. Rueda-Gómez , Élder J. Villamizar-Roa This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.NAcs.NA MSC 35Q3535Q9292C1765M1265M1565M60
keywords chemotaxis-Navier-StokessystemfiniteelementmethoderrorestimatesconvergencetoweaksolutionsmassconservationsplittingchemotaxisNavier-Stokes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper develops a fully discrete finite element scheme for the chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system that models bacteria swimming in an incompressible fluid, and it proves that the scheme is well-posed, conserves total cell mass, and converges to weak solutions. The main result is an error estimate of order $\Delta t + \max\{h^{r_1+1}, h^{r_2+1}, h^{r_3+1}, h^{r+1}\}$ for the discrete cell density, chemical concentration, chemical gradient, and fluid velocity in two dimensions, with the same form in three dimensions under a sufficiently regular exact solution. If the proof is correct, this is the first rigorous numerical analysis for this coupled system, giving a theoretical basis for simulations of bioconvection, bacterial aggregation, and plume formation. The paper also presents numerical experiments that match the predicted convergence rates.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the splitting mixed formulation: rewriting the chemoattractant equation so that the cell-density equation sees only $\sigma=\nabla c$, while the $\sigma$-equation enforces $\sigma=\nabla c$ weakly with divergence and curl penalties. The time discretization uses skew-symmetric trilinear forms $A$ and $B$ for the convection terms, which vanish when tested against the solution itself and supply the coercivity that makes each linear step unconditionally well-posed. In space, conforming finite element spaces for $n,c,\sigma,u,\pi$ with a discrete inf-sup condition (a stable velocity-pressure pairing) yield interpolation and Stokes projection estimates, and a discrete Gronwall inequality converts the assembled energy estimates into the stated convergence rates. The 2D proof closes the loop by verifying the needed inductive bound on $\|\sigma_h^{m-1}\|_{H^1}$; the 3D analogue replaces it with a joint bound on $\sigma_h$ and $c_h$.

What would settle it

Run the scheme on a three-dimensional manufactured solution with smooth data—say, an analytic triple $(n,c,u)$ satisfying (1.1) on a cube—and halve $h$ and $\Delta t$ repeatedly; the theorem predicts errors of order $\Delta t + \max\{h^{r_1+1},h^{r_2+1},h^{r_3+1},h^{r+1}\}$. If the measured rates are worse, or if a 3D solution known only to be weak cannot be shown to carry the required $H^{r+1}$ regularity, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the strong chemotaxis coupling $\nabla\cdot(\eta\nabla c)$ can be tamed numerically by introducing $\sigma=\nabla c$ as an independent variable and discretizing the resulting mixed variational form (2.12). For this reformulation, the paper constructs a first-order-in-time, linear, semi-coupled finite element scheme (3.15) and proves, in Theorems 5.4 and 5.5, that its errors against a regular solution are bounded by $C(T)(\Delta t + \max\{h^{r_1+1},h^{r_2+1},h^{r_3+1},h^{r+1}\})$ in the natural $L^2$/$H^1$ norms, with a stronger velocity-pressure estimate in Theorem 5.5. Consequently, as $\Delta t$ and $h$ tend to zero, the discrete solutions converge to weak solutions of the continuous model, and the discrete cell density preserves the total mass exactly.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a sufficiently regular exact solution of the continuous problem exists, with all the norms appearing in the error bounds finite; for the three-dimensional Navier-Stokes component this regularity is not known, and the paper's verification of the 3D inductive hypothesis is only sketched as 'in the same spirit'.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In two dimensions, the discrete solution converges to a weak solution of the chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system as $\Delta t$ and $h$ go to zero, at the rates stated in Theorems 5.4 and 5.5.
  • Each time step of the scheme is a linear system with a unique solution, so the method is unconditionally well-posed in the sense that no CFL-type restriction is needed for existence of discrete solutions.
  • The discrete cell density preserves total mass exactly at every step, matching the continuous conservation law $\int_\Omega \eta(\cdot,t)=\int_\Omega \eta_0$.
  • The numerical experiments with manufactured solutions show second-order convergence in $L^2$ and first-order convergence in $H^1$, consistent with the proven rates.
  • In three dimensions, the same error estimates hold whenever a sufficiently regular exact solution exists, so the scheme provides a convergent discretization for the 3D weak-solution regime as well.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The splitting variable $\sigma=\nabla c$ is a transferable device: the same mixed formulation should control the chemo-attraction coupling in Keller-Segel variants with logistic sources or different signal kinetics, as long as the signal equation keeps coercivity in $H^1_\sigma$.
  • Because the 3D error estimate inherits the open regularity problem of the Navier-Stokes equations, a practical user should treat the 3D rate as conditional; without extra smallness or regularization, convergence may still occur but without a proven order.
  • The scheme's linear, semi-coupled structure means it can be inserted into existing incompressible-flow finite element codes with minimal changes, making the proven rates a realistic target for production-scale bioconvection simulations.
  • A natural stress test is to replace the consumption term $\gamma\eta c$ by a linear production term and check whether the same inductive estimates survive; this would show exactly which part of the proof depends on the specific biology.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a fully discrete finite element scheme for the chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system (1.1)-(1.2) in two and three space dimensions. The authors introduce an auxiliary flux variable sigma = grad c and a splitting variational formulation, leading to a linear, semi-coupled, mass-conservative scheme (3.15). They prove unconditional well-posedness and discrete mass conservation (Theorem 4.2, Lemma 4.1), derive detailed two-dimensional error estimates in weak and strong norms (Theorems 5.4 and 5.5) under an inductive hypothesis on the discrete flux and a regularity assumption on the exact solution, sketch a three-dimensional analogue (Theorem 6.1), and claim convergence to weak solutions (Remark 5.7). The paper closes with two numerical experiments, including a manufactured-solution convergence study. The two-dimensional estimates are detailed and largely plausible, but the three-dimensional theorem is conditional on regularity that no cited existence result supplies, the claimed convergence to weak solutions is not proved, and the manufactured solution used in Test 2 is not verified against the target PDE.

Significance. If the two-dimensional error analysis can be made fully rigorous, it would be a valuable first contribution to the numerical analysis of this strongly coupled chemotaxis-fluid system. The scheme is attractive: it is linear, semi-coupled, mass-conservative, and built on a clean mixed formulation using sigma = grad c. The detailed inequalities (5.25), (5.35), (5.45), and (5.52) show real technical work and are the strongest part of the manuscript. However, the advertised three-dimensional error estimates and the convergence-to-weak-solutions claim are not established as stated, and the numerical validation is currently not meaningful for the target problem. The paper's significance in its present form is therefore substantially lower than claimed; the core two-dimensional analysis is the part that could survive a careful revision.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 6, Theorem 6.1] Theorem 6.1 asserts 3D error estimates under the assumption that a 'sufficiently regular solution' of (2.12) exists with norms such as ||n||_{L∞(H^{r1+1})}, ||[u,π]||_{L∞(H^{r+1}×H^r)}, and ||σ||_{L∞(H^{r3+1})}. The only 3D existence result quoted in the paper, Theorem 2.3 from Winkler, gives weak solutions with regularity n ∈ L∞(L1)∩L^{5/4}(W^{1,5/4}), c ∈ L∞(L∞)∩L^4(W^{1,4}), u ∈ L^2(V); none of these spaces provides the higher H^s norms required by Theorem 6.1. No global regularity theorem supplying the hypotheses of Theorem 6.1 is cited or proved, so the paper does not identify any known non-vacuous hypothesis under which the 3D result applies. The proof of Theorem 6.1 is also only sketched: the 3D modifications of I9 and R6+R9 are presented as two estimates, and the verification of the inductive hypothesis (6.1) is dismissed with 'can be verified in the same spirit of the two-dimensional case.' Because the abstract advertises error estimates and convergence for d=2,3, this incomplete conditional result is load-bearing.
  2. [Remark 5.7] The statement that Theorems 5.4 and 5.5 'in particular imply the convergence of the discrete solutions of the scheme (3.15) towards weak solutions of model (1.1)' is not justified. Theorems 5.4 and 5.5 are error estimates relative to a fixed sufficiently regular exact solution of the variational formulation (2.12). They do not address the case in which no such regular solution is known, and they contain no compactness argument or passage to the limit in the nonlinear terms that would identify a weak solution of the original system. This is an assertion rather than a proof, and it is repeated in the abstract. The claim should either be removed or replaced by a genuine compactness-based convergence theorem.
  3. [Section 7, Test 2] The manufactured solution in Test 2 is not shown to satisfy the homogeneous system (1.1)-(1.2) with all parameters set to 1. No potential φ is specified for the momentum equation, and no residual or source term is added to the scheme to compensate for the mismatch. Without such a verification, the convergence rates reported in Tables 1-5 do not validate the error estimates for the target problem; they validate the scheme only for a modified problem with an unspecified right-hand side. This undermines the numerical evidence for the paper's central claims.
  4. [Theorem 5.4, proof of (5.1)] The bootstrap used to verify the inductive hypothesis (5.1) is not closed as written. The error estimate (5.54) is derived under the inductive hypothesis (5.1), and then (5.1) is verified by invoking (5.54); the text states 'We derive (5.1) by using (5.54) recursively.' This is circular. Moreover, the constants in (5.24) and (5.51) depend on the bound K appearing in (5.1), and the paper does not show that the final constant C(T) in (5.54) is independent of K or that the recursive choice K = C0+1 is compatible with the smallness conditions in (5.56)-(5.57). The argument can likely be repaired by an explicit induction over m with a single smallness condition chosen after K is fixed, but the manuscript does not provide such an induction.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (5.53)] Equation (5.53) has a missing closing bracket: the norm is written as ||[n_t,c_t,u_t,σ_t|| and should be ||[n_t,c_t,u_t,σ_t]||.
  2. [Table 2] The header of Table 2 contains the typo ||c_h^m - c_h^m|| in the second column; this should presumably be ||c(t_m) - c_h^m||.
  3. [Section 3.1 and Introduction] There are several typographical errors, including 'Hyphotesis' in the Section 3.1 heading, 'atraction' in the Introduction, and 'validity' used where 'validate' is meant. These should be corrected.
  4. [Theorem 5.5] The proof refers to 'Lemma 11 of [12]' without stating the lemma. For a self-contained numerical analysis paper, the cited lemma (a Stokes projection inequality) should be stated explicitly or quoted in full.
  5. [Section 2.2] The derivation of the mixed formulation (2.12) from (2.10) involves differentiating the relation sigma = grad c with respect to time and is only formal for weak solutions. A sentence clarifying that this step is justified for smooth solutions and that the error analysis is performed under a regularity assumption would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the inductive bootstrap in Section 5 is a standard proof technique, and the 3D regularity caveat is a correctness gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The numerical scheme (3.15) is a linear, semi-coupled system whose well-posedness is proved by a purely algebraic uniqueness argument (Theorem 4.2), and the mass-conservation property follows immediately from the chosen finite element space X_n ⊂ \hat H^1(Ω) and the initialization, not from the error estimates. The error analysis in Section 5 is conditional on the inductive hypothesis (5.1), and the paper explicitly verifies it: "We derive (5.1) by using (5.54) recursively." This is a standard bootstrap, not a circular reduction: the base case ‖σ_h^0‖_{H^1} ≤ C0 ≤ K is known from the interpolation operator, and for each m the estimate (5.54) up to m−1 controls ‖ξ_σ^{m−1}‖_{H^1}, which with the inverse-inequality dichotomy (5.56)-(5.57) yields ‖σ_h^{m−1}‖_{H^1} ≤ K. The constants in (5.54) are stated to be independent of m, Δt, and h; dependence on the data-dependent constant K is harmless because K is fixed before Δt and h are taken small. The cited results are external or non-load-bearing: Winkler's weak solution theorem (Theorem 2.3) and the finite element interpolation estimates are used as hypotheses, not as the conclusions. The 3D Theorem 6.1 is explicitly conditional on the existence of "a sufficiently regular solution of (2.12)" and on the inductive hypothesis (6.1), and the verification of (6.1) is only asserted ("can be verified in the same spirit of the two-dimensional case"); this is an incompleteness or regularity limitation, not an equation-by-construction circularity. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is used to force the choice of scheme. Therefore no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numbers are fitted to data; the error constants C(T) depend on Sobolev norms of the exact solution and are not quantified. The auxiliary variables σ=∇c and the centered density n=η−α0 are mathematical reformulations of existing variables, not new physical entities, so they carry no independent experimental handle.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Global existence of 2D classical solutions (Theorem 2.1, cited from Winkler [30]) with regularity (2.7).
    Provides the regular exact solution that the 2D error estimates are measured against; without it the main theorem has no object to approximate.
  • domain assumption Existence of 3D weak solutions (Theorem 2.3, cited from Winkler [31]).
    Used to justify that weak solutions of (1.1)-(1.2) exist in 3D, but the error analysis needs more regularity than this theorem supplies.
  • standard math Discrete inf-sup condition (3.1) and Stokes projection approximation estimates (3.3)-(3.4).
    Standard finite element theory for Taylor-Hood or P1-bubble/P1 spaces, cited from [11] and [12]; underpins the pressure-velocity error control.
  • ad hoc to paper Inductive hypotheses (5.1) and (6.1), ||σ_h^{m-1}||_{H1} ≤ K and in 3D ||[σ_h,c_h]||_{H1} ≤ K.
    Introduced to close the nonlinear estimates; the verification uses the error estimates that it supports, and the paper does not show the constants are independent of K.
  • standard math Lemma 11 of [12] providing W^{1,6}×L^6 stability estimates for the Stokes problem.
    Used without proof in Theorem 5.5 to bootstrap velocity error to strong norms.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Numerical analysis for a chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TBTAUCXB

@misc{pith2026190803639,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Numerical analysis for a chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TBTAUCXB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03639}
}
abstract

In this paper we develop a numerical scheme for approximating a $d$-dimensional chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system, $d=2,3$, modeling cellular swimming in incompressible fluids. This model describes the chemotaxis-fluid interaction in cases where the chemical signal is consumed with a rate proportional to the amount of organisms. We construct numerical approximations based on the Finite Element method and analyze some error estimates and convergence towards weak solutions. In order to construct the numerical scheme, we use a splitting technique to deal with the chemo-attraction term in the cell-density equation, leading to introduce a new variable given by the gradient of the chemical concentration. Having the equivalent model, we consider a fully discrete Finite Element approximation which is well-posed and it is mass-conservative. We obtain uniform estimates and analyze the convergence of the scheme. Finally, we present some numerical simulations to verify the good behavior of our scheme, as well as to check numerically the error estimates proved in our theoretical analysis.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.03639 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Cell density vs Chemical concentration. (a) Discrete velocity field at time t=1e-5 (b) Discrete velocity field at time t=12e-5 (c) Discrete velocity field at time t=30e-5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Evolution of the velocity field of the fluid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Amrouche and N

    C. Amrouche and N. E. H. Seloula, Lp-theory for vector potentials and Sobolev’s inequalities for vector fields: application to the Stokes equations with pressure boundary conditions. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 23 (2013), no. 1, 37-92

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Bessemoulin-Chatard and A

    M. Bessemoulin-Chatard and A. J¨ ungel. A finite volume scheme for a Keller-Segel model with additional cross-diffusion, IMA J. Numer. Anal. 34 (2014), no. 1, 96-122

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    Brenner and L.R

    S.C. Brenner and L.R. Scott, The mathematical theory of finite element methods , Third edition, Texts in Applied Mathematics, 15. Springer, New York (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Chertock, K

    A. Chertock, K. Fellner, A. Kurganov, A. Lorz and P. Markowich.Sinking, merging and stationary plumes in a coupled chemotaxis-fluid model: a high-resolution numerical approach.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 694 (2012), 155-190

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    M. Cui. Analysis of a semidiscrete discontinuous Galerkin scheme for compressible miscible dis- placement problem. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 214 (2008) 617-636

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    Deleuze, C.-Y

    Y. Deleuze, C.-Y. Chiang, M. Thiriet and T. W. Sheu. Numerical study of plume patterns in a chemotaxis-diffusion-convection coupling system. Computers and Fluids, 126 (2016), 58-70

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Duarte-Rodr´ ıguez, L

    A. Duarte-Rodr´ ıguez, L. C. F. Ferreira, E. J. Villamizar-Roa, Global existence for an attraction- repulsion chemotaxis fluid model with logistic source. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 24 (2019), no. 2, 423-447

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Epshteyn and A

    Y. Epshteyn and A. Izmirlioglu. Fully discrete analysis of a discontinuous finite element method for the Keller-Segel chemotaxis model, J. Sci. Comput. 40 (2009), no. 1-3, 211-256

    work page 2009

Show all 35 references
  1. [9]

    Jr. J. Douglas and J. E. Roberts, Numerical Methods for a Model for Compressible Miscible Displacement in Porous Media. Math. Comp. 41 (1983), no. 164, 441-459

    1983

  2. [10]

    Filbet, A finite volume scheme for the Patlak-Keller-Segel chemotaxis model, Numer

    F. Filbet, A finite volume scheme for the Patlak-Keller-Segel chemotaxis model, Numer. Math. 104 (2006), no. 4, 457-488

    2006

  3. [11]

    Girault and P.-A

    V. Girault and P.-A. Raviart, Finite element methods for Navier-Stokes equations. Theory and algorithms, Springer-Verlag, 1986

    1986

  4. [12]

    Guill´ en-Gonz´ alez and M

    F. Guill´ en-Gonz´ alez and M. V. Redondo-Neble, Spatial error estimates for a finite element viscosity-splitting scheme for the Navier-Stokes equations . Int. J. Numer. Anal. Model. 10 (2013), no. 4, 826-844

    2013

  5. [13]

    Guill´ en-Gonz´ alez, M

    F. Guill´ en-Gonz´ alez, M. A. Rodr´ ıguez-Bellido and D. A. Rueda-G´ omez.Unconditionally energy stable fully discrete schemes for a chemo-repulsion model. Mathematics of Computation88 (2019), no. 319, 2069-2099

    2019

  6. [14]

    Guill´ en-Gonz´ alez, M

    F. Guill´ en-Gonz´ alez, M. A. Rodr´ ıguez-Bellido and D. A. Rueda-G´ omez.Study of a chemo- repul- sion model with quadratic production. Part I: Analysis of the continuous problem and time-discrete numerical schemes, submitted

  7. [15]

    Guill´ en-Gonz´ alez, M

    F. Guill´ en-Gonz´ alez, M. A. Rodr´ ıguez-Bellido and D. A. Rueda-G´ omez.Study of a chemo- repulsion model with quadratic production. Part II: Analysis of an unconditional energy- stable fully discrete scheme, submitted

  8. [16]

    Heywood and R

    J. Heywood and R. Rannacher. Finite element approximation of the nonstationary Navier-Stokes problem. IV. Error analysis for second order time discretization. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 27 (1990), 353-384. Numerical analysis of a chemotaxis-fluid model 25

    1990

  9. [17]

    Hill and T

    N. Hill and T. Pedley. Bioconvection. Fluid Dynamics Research, 37(1):1-20, 2005

    2005

  10. [18]

    Jiang, H

    J. Jiang, H. Wu and S. Zheng. Global existence and asymptotic behavior of solutions to a chemotaxis-fluid system on general bounded domains, Asympt. Anal. 92 (2015) 249-258

    2015

  11. [19]

    Karimi and M

    A. Karimi and M. Paul. Bioconvection in spatially extended domains. Physical Review E, 87(5):053016, 2013

    2013

  12. [20]

    Lankeit, Long-term behaviour in a chemotaxis-fluid system with logistic source, Math

    J. Lankeit, Long-term behaviour in a chemotaxis-fluid system with logistic source, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 26 (2016), 2071-2109

    2016

  13. [21]

    H. G. Lee and J. Kim. Numerical investigation of falling bacterial plumes caused by bioconvection in a three-dimensional chamber. European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids, 52 (2015), 120-130

    2015

  14. [22]

    Marrocco

    A. Marrocco. Numerical simulation of chemotactic bacteria aggregation via mixed finite elements, M2AN Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 37 (2003), no. 4, 617-630

    2003

  15. [23]

    Mizoguchi and Ph

    N. Mizoguchi and Ph. Souplet, Nondegeneracy of blow-up points for the parabolic Keller-Segel system, Ann. I. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire, 31 (2014) 851-875

    2014

  16. [24]

    Necas, Les M´ ethodes Directes en Th´ eorie des Equations Elliptiques

    J. Necas, Les M´ ethodes Directes en Th´ eorie des Equations Elliptiques. Editeurs Academia, Prague (1967)

    1967

  17. [25]

    Saito, Conservative upwind finite-element method for a simplified Keller-Segel system modelling chemotaxis, IMA J

    N. Saito, Conservative upwind finite-element method for a simplified Keller-Segel system modelling chemotaxis, IMA J. Numer. Anal. 27 (2007), no. 2, 332-365

    2007

  18. [26]

    Saito, Error analysis of a conservative finite-element approximation for the Keller-Segel system of chemotaxis, Commun

    N. Saito, Error analysis of a conservative finite-element approximation for the Keller-Segel system of chemotaxis, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 11 (2012), no. 1, 339-364

    2012

  19. [27]

    Stenberg, A technique for analysing finite element methods for viscous incompressible flow

    R. Stenberg, A technique for analysing finite element methods for viscous incompressible flow. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 11 (1990), 935–948

    1990

  20. [28]

    Tao and M

    Y. Tao and M. Winkler, Boundedness and decay enforced by quadratic degradation in a three- dimensional chemotaxis-fluid system, Zeitschrift f¨ ur angewandte Mathematik und Physik, 66 (2015), no. 5, 2555-2573

    2015

  21. [29]

    Tuval, L

    I. Tuval, L. Cisneros, C. Dombrowski, C. W. Wolgemuth, J. O. Kessler and R. E. Goldstein. Bacterial swimming and oxygen transport near contact lines, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102 (2005), 2277-2282

    2005

  22. [30]

    M. Winkler. Global large-data solutions in a chemotaxis-(Navier-) Stokes system modelling cellular swimming in fluid drops, Communications in Partial Differential Equations, 37 (2012), 319-351

    2012

  23. [31]

    M. Winkler. Global weak solutions in a three-dimensional chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system, An- nales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e (C)Non Linear Analysis, 33 (2016), 1329-1352

    2016

  24. [32]

    M. Winkler. Stabilization in a two-dimensional chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 211 (2014) 455-487

    2014

  25. [33]

    Yang and Y.Chen

    J. Yang and Y.Chen. Superconvergence of a Combined Mixed Finite Element and Discontinuous Galerkin Method for a Compressible Miscible Displacement Problem. Acta Mathematicae Appli- catae Sinica, English Series, 27, No. 3 (2011) 481-494

    2011

  26. [34]

    Zhang and Y

    Q. Zhang and Y. Li. Convergence rates of solutions for a two-dimensional chemotaxis- Navier- Stokes system, Discrete Contin. Dynam. Syst. Ser. B 20 (2015) 2751-2759

    2015

  27. [35]

    Zhang, J

    J. Zhang, J. Zhu and R. Zhang. Characteristic splitting mixed finite element analysis of Keller- Segel chemotaxis models. Applied Mathematics and Computation 278 (2016) 33-44

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.