Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Unbiased Cosmic Opacity Constraints from Standard Sirens and Candles

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1902.00223 v2 pith:TC3VUGGV submitted 2019-02-01 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords cosmicopacitykappastandardconstraintsdistanceseventssimulated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The observation of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) plays an essential role in probing the expansion history of the universe. But the possible presence of cosmic opacity can degrade the quality of SNe Ia. The gravitational-wave (GW) standard sirens, produced by the coalescence of double neutron stars and black hole--neutron star binaries, provide an independent way to measure the distances of GW sources, which are not affected by cosmic opacity. In this paper, we first propose that combining the GW observations of third-generation GW detectors with SN Ia data in similar redshift ranges offers a novel and model-independent method to constrain cosmic opacity. Through Monte Carlo simulations, we find that one can constrain the cosmic opacity parameter $\kappa$ with an accuracy of $\sigma_{\kappa}\sim0.046$ by comparing the distances from 100 simulated GW events and 1048 current Pantheon SNe Ia. The uncertainty of $\kappa$ can be further reduced to $\sim0.026$ if 800 GW events are considered. We also demonstrate that combining 2000 simulated SNe Ia and 1000 simulated GW events could result in much severer constraints on the transparent universe, for which $\kappa=0.0000\pm0.0044$. Compared to previous opacity constraints involving distances from other cosmic probes, our method using GW standard sirens and SN Ia standard candles at least achieves competitive results.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools