Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 25 references

Thermal-Gradient Cooling of Atomic Vapor Fluid

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A heated vapor cell, cooled internally by laser-driven convection, can hold densities above 10^22 per cubic meter at tens of kelvins, raising optical depth 4.3-fold over uniform heating.

desk verdict Interesting derivation, but the central steady state is not physical: the cooling beams are absorbed in the hot shell, and the c=0 solution contradicts the claimed convection. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.02112 v1 pith:TCSI4XH7 submitted 2025-05-04 physics.atom-ph

Changhao Cheng , Jinxian Guo This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-ph
keywords thermal-gradientcoolingatomicvaporlaserBoltzmanntransportequationNavier-Stokesequationsopticaldepthconvectivefluidnon-equilibriumsteadystate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Hot atomic vapors give high optical depth but short coherence times, while laser-cooled atoms give long coherence but low density. This paper proposes to break that trade-off by combining a heated cell wall with six red-detuned Doppler laser beams, so that evaporation from the wall and velocity-selective laser forces set up a convective atomic fluid: hot atoms are expelled at the boundary and cold atoms accumulate at the center. The authors derive Navier-Stokes equations for the vapor from a Boltzmann-type transport equation and solve the stationary heat-conduction limit. For a 7.5 cm rubidium cell at a 520 K boundary with $\Omega=10\Gamma$ and $\delta=-100\Gamma$, the simulation gives a central temperature of 88.5 K and density $2.9\times10^{22}\,\mathrm{m^{-3}}$, a 4.3-fold gain in effective optical depth over the uniformly heated cell. If correct, this offers a room-temperature-compatible route to ensembles that are simultaneously dense and cold.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Boltzmann-type transport equation $\partial_t\omega + v\nabla\omega + \frac{1}{m}\partial_v\cdot(F\omega) - \frac{1}{m^2}\partial_v\partial_v:D\omega = J[\omega,\omega]$, which adds a velocity-dependent cooling force $F(v)$ and momentum-space diffusion $D$ from laser cooling to the standard collision term. A Chapman-Enskog expansion turns this into Navier-Stokes equations for the vapor, and in the stationary, no-flow limit they collapse to two ordinary equations: momentum balance $k_B\nabla(nT)=I(T)\nabla T$ and heat balance $\nabla\cdot\kappa(T)\nabla T + Q^{(0)}(n,T)+Q^{(1)}(T)=0$. The key identity is $n(T)=\frac{\int_{T_0}^{T}I(T')\,dT'+n_0k_BT_0}{k_BT}$, which converts a temperature drop into a density rise, directly producing the negative density-temperature correlation. The numerical solution uses rigid-sphere transport coefficients for $\kappa$ and $I$ and drops $Q^{(1)}$ after a BGK-model estimate shows it is small at high density.

What would settle it

Measure the transmission of the cooling beams through a cell under the claimed conditions: if a 7.5 cm rubidium cell at central density near $3\times10^{22}\,\mathrm{m^{-3}}$ attenuates a resonant beam within tens of micrometers, the uniform-intensity assumption fails and the predicted central temperature is not reachable; alternatively, probe the center's velocity distribution and find a Doppler width consistent with 88 K rather than hundreds of kelvins.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a non-equilibrium steady state in which density and temperature are anti-correlated in space: the vapor is hottest and least dense at the cell wall and coldest and most dense at the center. The mechanism is thermal-gradient transport: boundary heating maintains a saturated vapor at the wall, while the six Doppler lasers exert a velocity-dependent force that slows atoms moving inward and, together with spontaneous-emission diffusion, dissipates their kinetic energy. In the stationary no-flow limit the momentum balance reduces to $k_B\nabla(nT)=I(T)\nabla T$, so the density profile is determined by the temperature profile through $n(T)=\left(\int_{T_0}^{T} I(T')\,dT' + n_0 k_B T_0\right)/(k_B T)$, and the temperature profile follows a heat-conduction equation whose dissipation term is proportional to density. Numerically, for a 7.5 cm cell at $T_0=520$ K with $\Omega=10\Gamma$ and $\delta=-100\Gamma$, the center reaches 88.5 K at $2.9\times10^{22}\,\mathrm{m^{-3}}$, raising the effective optical depth by a factor of 4.3 compared with the same cell heated uniformly; matching that optical depth by heating alone would require 569 K. At the center the estimated atomic collision time is about 163 ns, long enough for several coherent operations.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes the six cooling lasers pass through the vapor as undiminished plane waves, so their intensity is constant from the wall to the center; if beam absorption or scattering becomes significant, the predicted 88 K center cannot be reached.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A room-temperature (or modestly heated) vapor cell could deliver both high optical depth and low central temperature, removing the usual need to choose between dense hot vapors and sparse cold atoms.
  • The effective optical depth of the central region rises 4.3-fold over the uniformly heated cell; reproducing that optical depth by heating alone would require 569 K instead of 520 K.
  • Longer central collision times, about 163 ns in the simulated case, open a window for several coherent operations in a simple hot-cell geometry.
  • The steady state exists only for limited cell sizes and densities; beyond that, the stationary heat equation has no solution and the full time-dependent Navier-Stokes equations must be used.
  • Increasing the boundary temperature or the cell radius can lower the central temperature further, because the laser dissipation grows with density and the center is farther from the hot wall.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A quantitative check the paper does not perform: at the predicted central density and detuning $\delta=-100\Gamma$, the resonant absorption length for the cooling beams is only tens of micrometers, so the constant-intensity plane-wave assumption likely fails long before the beams reach the center; including Beer-Lambert attenuation in the heat equation would test whether the 88 K state survives.
  • The same thermal-gradient mechanism should be testable with other alkalis such as sodium, potassium, or cesium, whose saturated vapor pressures set the boundary density and hence the achievable dissipation; comparing central temperature versus boundary temperature across species would isolate the role of vapor pressure.
  • A direct experimental falsifier would be to measure the Doppler-broadened linewidth of a weak probe through the cell center: a central temperature near 88 K would show a narrow line, while failure of the cooling beams to penetrate would leave the line broad.
  • The scheme requires continuous power input to maintain the non-equilibrium steady state; a natural follow-up is to estimate the heat load and entropy production, since the claimed advantage is precisely a departure from equilibrium thermodynamics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript proposes a 'thermal-gradient cooling' scheme for a hot alkali vapor cell. The authors augment the Boltzmann equation with a velocity-dependent Doppler laser force and a momentum-diffusion term, derive hydrodynamic moment equations, apply the Chapman-Enskog expansion to obtain Navier-Stokes-like equations, and then study the stationary state. For a spherical 7.5 cm rubidium cell with wall temperature 520 K and six detuned laser beams (Ω=10Γ, δ=-100Γ), they numerically solve the resulting stationary heat-conduction equation and report a central temperature of 88.5 K, central density 2.9×10^22 m^-3, and a 4.3-fold enhancement of optical depth relative to a uniformly heated cell. They also discuss how the central temperature and density scale with cell radius and reservoir temperature.

Significance. The formal part of the paper is a useful exercise: the kinetic derivation from the Boltzmann equation through the Chapman-Enskog expansion with velocity-dependent forces is systematic, and the paper is candid about the regime in which no stationary solution exists and about the smallness of the first-order dissipative correction Q^(1). If the predicted state were realizable, the scheme would be significant for quantum metrology and quantum information. However, the quantitative central claim rests on load-bearing assumptions that are not valid for the stated parameters: the stationary state is taken to have zero flow, contradicting the advertised convective mechanism, and the cooling lasers are treated as uniform plane waves despite severe Beer-Lambert absorption at the claimed densities. In addition, the rigid-sphere collision radius used in the numerics is never specified. The significance of the scheme is therefore not established by the present manuscript.

major comments (3)
  1. [III, Eqs. (25)-(27)] The derivation of the stationary state sets c≡0, but this does not follow from the stated boundary conditions. At steady state Eq. (25a) gives ∇·(ρc)=0; together with c|r=0=0 and ∇·c|r=0=0 this does not force c to vanish in the bulk. Moreover, the abstract and Fig. 1 motivate the scheme by a 'convective atomic fluid' and 'thermal convection' from the boundary to the center, so the zero-flow ansatz contradicts the advertised mechanism. With c=0, Eqs. (32)-(34) describe heat conduction with a laser force, not convective transport. In the limit I(T)→0, Eq. (33) reduces to n(T)=n0T0/T, so the density contrast is essentially isobaric cooling compression rather than convective accumulation. The authors should either prove from the full stationary Eqs. (25) and the boundary conditions that the only regular solution has c=0, or they must reconcile the claimed convective mechanism with a nonzero-flow steady state.
  2. [II.A and IV, Eq. (34), Fig. 2] The assumption 'the cooling lasers are all plane waves, thus ∇Ω=0' is not a harmless idealization at the densities claimed. For the parameters of Fig. 2 (87Rb D2, δ=-100Γ, Ω=10Γ, n0=4.9×10^21 m^-3 at T0=520 K), the cooling beams are strongly absorbed before reaching the cell center. Estimating the velocity-averaged absorption coefficient for a Doppler-shifted resonance, α = n0 σ0 ∫ dv g(v) [1+s+(2(δ-kv)/Γ)^2]^{-1} with s=2Ω²/Γ² and power broadening included, gives a 1/e absorption length of order 10 μm, compared with a cell radius of 7.5 cm. Since F_mac and Q^(0) in Eqs. (31)-(32) are proportional to the local laser intensity, the central region has essentially no laser-cooling source, so Eq. (34) cannot produce the predicted T_c=88.5 K in a real cell. The model must include beam attenuation or provide an explicit justification of intensity uniformity at these densities before the central quantitative prediction can be accepted.
  3. [IV, Eqs. (35)-(37), Fig. 2] The rigid-sphere collision radius σ is the only interatomic interaction parameter in the model, and the numerical results are not reproducible without it. Equations (37) show κ(T)∝1/σ² and I(T)∝1/σ², so the stationary solution of Eq. (34) shown in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 depends sensitively on σ. The text defines σ only as 'the average collision radius' and gives no numerical value or source. Please state the value used for rubidium and provide a sensitivity analysis in σ; otherwise the quantitative claims (T_c=88.5 K, n_c=2.9×10^22 m^-3, 4.3-fold OD enhancement) cannot be checked.
minor comments (5)
  1. [II.B, Eq. (16b)] In Eq. (16b) and also in Eq. (25b), the advective term is written as −c_j ∂c_j/∂x_j, which is inconsistent with the free index i on the left-hand side; it should presumably be −c_j ∂c_i/∂x_j.
  2. [Title] The title contains a typo: 'Thermal-Gradient Cooling of Atomic V apor Fluid' should read 'Atomic Vapor Fluid'.
  3. [IV, Table I caption] The caption of Table I reads 'Th Maximum order of magnitude'; this should be 'The maximum order of magnitude'.
  4. [IV, Fig. 2] The numerical method used to solve Eq. (34) is not described (mesh, boundary treatment, solver); please add a brief description so the results can be reproduced.
  5. [V, Conclusion] The Knudsen-number estimates in the conclusion (Kn≈0.1 at 160°C and ≈0.01 at 220°C for R=5 cm) are not derived; please specify the mean-free-path expression and the cross-section used for these estimates.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the steady-state result is obtained by solving the stated transport equations with fixed boundary and laser parameters.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The inputs are the boundary temperature T0=520 K, laser parameters Ω=10Γ and δ=-100Γ, the rigid-sphere collision radius σ, and the saturated-vapor boundary density; the outputs Tc=88.5 K and nc=2.9×10^22 m^-3 are obtained by numerically solving the stationary heat-conduction equation (Eq. 34) after integrating the force-balance relation (Eq. 33). No output quantity is used to set an input: n(T) is derived from kB∇(nT)=I(T)∇T, not imposed, and the Q(1) term is discarded only after an internal BGK-model estimate of |Q(1)/Q(0)| (Table I). The self-citations (Refs. [5] and [6]) are application examples in the introduction and do not carry the mathematical derivation. The appended limitations (possible absence of steady state for large R or high n; Kn≈0.1 at 160 °C) and the plane-wave assumption ∇Ω=0 are physical soundness issues rather than circularity: they concern whether the model's input assumption holds, not whether an output was built into the derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The prediction depends on the Boltzmann equation with a velocity-dependent laser force, the Chapman-Enskog expansion, the rigid-sphere model, the c=0 steady-state ansatz, and the uniform-intensity assumption. The last two are especially fragile and are not validated.

free parameters (4)
  • Rigid-sphere collision radius sigma = not stated
    Entered via kappa(T) and I(T) in Eq. 37; the displayed temperature and density profiles depend on its value, but the paper never gives it.
  • Laser Rabi frequency Omega = 10 Gamma
    Chosen simulation parameter; a control knob, not a fitted constant.
  • Laser detuning delta = -100 Gamma
    Chosen simulation parameter; a control knob, not a fitted constant.
  • Reservoir temperature T0 = 520 K
    Boundary condition for the steady-state solution; an input from the experimental setup.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The Boltzmann transport equation with two-body collisions describes the dense alkali vapor (mean free path much smaller than system size).
    Invoked in Section II.A; requires the gas to be dilute enough for binary collisions yet dense enough for continuum flow. At n about 10^22 m^-3 the mean free path is roughly 20 micrometers, so Kn about 3e-4, which supports the continuum assumption.
  • standard math Chapman-Enskog expansion in powers of the flow gradient converges, and the laser force can be treated at the same order.
    Standard kinetic theory (Cercignani, Chapman-Cowling); the paper assumes convergence without explicit small-parameter checks.
  • domain assumption Rigid-sphere potential V=infinity for r<sigma models Rb-Rb collisions.
    Introduced in Eq. 35 to compute B, kappa and I; a crude approximation for alkali atoms with no validation at the quoted densities.
  • ad hoc to paper The stationary state has zero flow velocity, c identical to 0.
    Eq. 27 is asserted from the continuity equation and boundary density, but a divergence-free flow with fixed boundary density is not unique. This contradicts the claimed convective transport in the abstract.
  • ad hoc to paper The laser intensity is uniform across the cell (grad Omega = 0) with no Beer-Lambert attenuation.
    Stated after Eq. 2. At the quoted densities this assumption is invalid: the far-detuned absorption length is tens of micrometers, far smaller than the cell radius.
  • domain assumption The first-order heat dissipation Q(1) is negligible compared with Q(0).
    Supported by BGK estimates in Table I showing |Q(1)/Q(0)| below 10^-2, so dropping it is a controlled approximation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Thermal-Gradient Cooling of Atomic Vapor Fluid." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TCSI4XH7

@misc{pith2026250502112,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Thermal-Gradient Cooling of Atomic Vapor Fluid},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TCSI4XH7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.02112}
}
read the original abstract

The pursuit of high optical depth and long coherence time in atomic ensembles faces a fundamental thermodynamic constraint: heating enhances light-atom coupling via increased density but degrades coherence through thermal broadening, while laser cooling preserves coherence at the cost of density loss. Here, we demonstrate a non-equilibrium strategy that spatially achieves a negative correlation between density and temperature via controlled thermal-gradient transport. By engineering a temperature gradient via laser-cooling in a hot vapor cell, we drive a convective atomic fluid that expels hot atoms at the boundary while confining low-temperature atoms in the central region. This dynamic process sustains a density of 10^22m^-3 and a temperature of tens of kelvins at the center. A theoretical scheme based on the Boltzmann-type transport equation is established, which gives Navier-Stokes equations for non-equilibrium thermal-gradient atomic fluid. The results of numerical simulation indicate that this scheme can enhance the optical depth while reducing the temperature of the system, establishing a route to bypass equilibrium thermodynamics in room-temperature atom-light interactions, boosting high-performance quantum metrology and quantum information applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.02112 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of thermal-gradient cooling. (a) Six [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Stationary temperature distribution and number density distribution of thermal gradient cooling on the cross-section of the vapor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The central temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Laser spectroscopy of hot atomic vapours: from’scope to theoretical fit

    D Pizzey , JD Briscoe, FD Logue, FS Ponciano-Ojeda, SA Wrathmall, and IG Hughes. Laser spectroscopy of hot atomic vapours: from’scope to theoretical fit. New Journal of Physics, 24(12):125001, 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Here we set the temperature of the thermal reservoir as T0 = 520K and specify the parameters of the cooling laser as Ω = 10Γ andδ =−100Γ . It can be seen that the tem- perature decreases rapidly from 520K at the boundary to 88.5K at the center ( X = 0cm, Y = 0cm) as the distance to the center decreases, with a minimum value occurring at the center. This i...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Oberthaler, Roman Schmied, and Philipp Treutlein

    Luca Pezzè, Augusto Smerzi, Markus K. Oberthaler, Roman Schmied, and Philipp Treutlein. Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles. Rev. Mod. Phys. , 90:035005, Sep 2018

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Ad- vances in quantum metrology

    Vittorio Giovannetti, Seth Lloyd, and Lorenzo Maccone. Ad- vances in quantum metrology . Nature photonics, 5(4):222– 229, 2011

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    J. C. Allred, R. N. Lyman, T . W . Kornack, and M. V . Romalis. High-sensitivity atomic magnetometer unaffected by spin- exchange relaxation. Phys. Rev. Lett., 89:130801, Sep 2002

    work page 2002

  6. [6]

    Quan- tum magnetic gradiometer with entangled twin light beams

    Shuhe Wu, Guzhi Bao, Jinxian Guo, Jun Chen, Wei Du, Min- wei Shi, Peiyu Yang, Liqing Chen, and Weiping Zhang. Quan- tum magnetic gradiometer with entangled twin light beams. Science Advances, 9(15):eadg1760, 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Jinxian Guo, Xiaotian Feng, Peiyu Yang, Zhifei Yu, L. Q. Chen, Chun-Hua Yuan, and Weiping Zhang. High-performance Ra- man quantum memory with optimal control in room temper- ature atoms. Nature Communications, 10(1):148, January 2019

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Springer, 1973

    Wolfgang Demtröder.Laser spectroscopy, volume 2. Springer, 1973

    work page 1973

Show all 25 references
  1. [9]

    Goldenstein, R.Mitchell Spearrin, Jay

    Christopher S. Goldenstein, R.Mitchell Spearrin, Jay . B. Jef- fries, and Ronald K. Hanson. Infrared laser-absorption sens- ing for combustion gases. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 60:132–176, 2017

    2017

  2. [10]

    Kluttz, Todd D

    Kelly A. Kluttz, Todd D. Averett, and Brian A. Wolin. Pressure broadening and frequency shift of the D1 and D2 lines of rb and k in the presence of3he and n2. Phys. Rev. A, 87:032516, Mar 2013

    2013

  3. [11]

    Many-body physics with ultracold gases

    Immanuel Bloch, Jean Dalibard, and Wilhelm Zwerger. Many-body physics with ultracold gases. Rev. Mod. Phys. , 80:885–964, Jul 2008

    2008

  4. [12]

    Cold-atom densities of more than 10 12 cm- 3 in a holographically shaped dark spontaneous-force optical trap

    N Radwell, G Walker, and S Franke-Arnold. Cold-atom densities of more than 10 12 cm- 3 in a holographically shaped dark spontaneous-force optical trap. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics , 88(4):043409, 8 2013

    2013

  5. [13]

    Electromag- netic trapping of cold atoms

    VI Balykin, VG Minogin, and VS Letokhov. Electromag- netic trapping of cold atoms. Reports on Progress in Physics, 63(9):1429, 2000

    2000

  6. [14]

    Influence of nonconservative external forces on self-diffusion in dilute gases

    V Garzó, A Santos, and JJ Brey . Influence of nonconservative external forces on self-diffusion in dilute gases. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , 163(2):651–671, 1990

    1990

  7. [15]

    Influence of a drag force on linear transport in low-density gases

    José Carlos Pérez-Fuentes and Vicente Garzó. Influence of a drag force on linear transport in low-density gases. stability analysis. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 410:428–438, 2014

    2014

  8. [16]

    Kinetic theory of gases in shear flows: nonlinear transport , volume 131

    Vicente Garzó and Andrés Santos. Kinetic theory of gases in shear flows: nonlinear transport , volume 131. Springer Sci- ence & Business Media, 2013

    2013

  9. [17]

    The semiclassical theory of laser cooling

    Stig Stenholm. The semiclassical theory of laser cooling. Re- views of modern physics, 58(3):699, 1986

    1986

  10. [18]

    The boltzmann equa- tion

    Carlo Cercignani and Carlo Cercignani. The boltzmann equa- tion. Springer, 1988

    1988

  11. [19]

    The mathe- matical theory of non-uniform gases: an account of the kinetic theory of viscosity, thermal conduction and diffusion in gases

    Sydney Chapman and Thomas George Cowling. The mathe- matical theory of non-uniform gases: an account of the kinetic theory of viscosity, thermal conduction and diffusion in gases . Cambridge university press, 1990

    1990

  12. [20]

    Rubidium 87 d line data

    Daniel A Steck. Rubidium 87 d line data. 2001

    2001

  13. [21]

    A model for collision processes in gases

    Prabhu Lal Bhatnagar, Eugene P Gross, and Max Krook. A model for collision processes in gases. i. small amplitude pro- cesses in charged and neutral one-component systems.Phys- ical review, 94(3):511, 1954

    1954

  14. [22]

    Serf atomic magnetometer–recent advances and applications: A review

    Jundi Li, Wei Quan, Binquan Zhou, Zhuo Wang, Jixi Lu, Zhaohui Hu, Gang Liu, and Jiancheng Fang. Serf atomic magnetometer–recent advances and applications: A review. IEEE Sensors Journal, 18(20):8198–8207, 2018

    2018

  15. [23]

    C Vadla, Robert Beuc, Vlasta Horvatic, Mladen Movre, Alfred Quentmeier, and Kay Niemax. Comparison of theoretical and experimental red and near infrared absorption spectra in overheated potassium vapour.The European Physical Journal D-Atomic, Molecular, Optical and Plasma Phys...

    2006

  16. [24]

    Accurate determination of the atomic number density in dense cs va- pors by absorption measurements of cs 2 triplet bands

    Cedomil Vadla, Vlasta Horvatic, and Kay Niemax. Accurate determination of the atomic number density in dense cs va- pors by absorption measurements of cs 2 triplet bands. Ap- plied Physics B, 84:523–527, 2006

    2006

  17. [25]

    Alkali pressure shifts and their temperature dependence: Measurements with the rb isoclinic point

    N Wells, T Driskell, and J Camparo. Alkali pressure shifts and their temperature dependence: Measurements with the rb isoclinic point. In 2014 IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium (FCS), pages 1–1. IEEE, 2014

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.