Averaging principles for time-inhomogeneous multi-scale SDEs via nonautonomous Poisson equations

Jian Wang; Xiaobin Sun; Yingchao Xie

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Averaging principles for time-inhomogeneous multi-scale SDEs via nonautonomous Poisson equations

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves explicit strong and weak averaging rates for time-inhomogeneous multi-scale SDEs, with rates that depend on the time-dependent dissipation of the fast process.

desk verdict New explicit rates for nonautonomous multiscale averaging, but the weak-rate proof has a gap that needs a real fix before the main claim can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.09850 v1 pith:TEUFUUY4 submitted 2024-12-13 math.PR

Xiaobin Sun , Jian Wang , Yingchao Xie This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.PR MSC 34D0834D2560H20

keywords averagingprincipletime-inhomogeneousstochasticdifferentialequationsmulti-scaleSDEnonautonomousPoissonequationevolutionsystemofmeasuresexplicitconvergenceratesslow-fastsystemsperiodiccoefficients

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that the slow component of a two-scale stochastic system can be approximated by an averaged equation even when the fast dynamics depends on time through the scaled clock $t/\varepsilon$, and it gives explicit rates for the error in mean square and in law. The rates are controlled by a single function $\alpha(t)$ that measures how fast the frozen fast process forgets its past; depending on $\alpha$, the strong error can be smaller or larger than the classical $\varepsilon^{1/2}$, and explicit formulas are obtained when $\alpha(t)=c_0(1+t)^{\beta}$. To reach these rates, the paper replaces the classical invariant measure with an evolution system of measures and replaces the autonomous Poisson equation with a nonautonomous one, whose solution is a conditional integral of the centred fluctuation. When the fast coefficients converge or are periodic in time, the averaged equation can be chosen independent of $\varepsilon$, and the paper tracks how the convergence modulus or the period enters the rate. Two solvable one-dimensional examples show that the rates are sharp and that earlier periodic averaging statements missed the optimal strong order.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the nonautonomous Poisson equation $\partial_s\Phi(s,x,y)+\mathcal{L}_x(s)\Phi(s,x,\cdot)(y)=-H(s,x,y)$, where $\mathcal{L}_x(s)$ is the generator of the frozen fast SDE; its solution is represented as $\Phi(s,x,y)=\int_s^{\infty}\mathbb{E}H(r,x,Y_r^{s,x,y})\,dr$, which is the time-inhomogeneous analogue of the classical Poisson equation used for optimal rates in autonomous slow-fast systems. The companion object is the evolution system of measures $\{\mu_t^x\}$, the family of laws reached from the infinite past, which replaces the invariant measure and defines the averaged coefficients $\bar b(t,x)=\int b(x,y)\,\mu_t^x(dy)$ and $\overline{\sigma\sigma^*}(t,x)=\int(\sigma\sigma^*)(x,y)\,\mu_t^x(dy)$. The derivative estimates (2.29) on $\Phi$, together with Itô's formula applied along the slow-fast trajectories, convert the error into $\varepsilon$ times integrals of $\alpha$ and the kernels $\Lambda$ and $\Lambda_\gamma$.

What would settle it

The sharpness claim in Example 6.1 is directly checkable: with $\alpha(t)=c_0(1+t)^{\beta}$, the paper's formulas say the mean-square error is of order $\varepsilon^{1+\beta}$ for $-1<\beta<1$, $\varepsilon^2\log(1/\varepsilon)$ for $\beta=1$, and $\varepsilon^2$ for $\beta>1$; computing the exact covariance of the linear system would reveal whether these exponents hold, and any mismatch would invalidate the rate theorems.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the Poisson-equation route to optimal averaging rates works in the time-inhomogeneous setting, provided one uses the evolution system of measures $\{\mu_t^x\}_{t\in\mathbb{R}}$ of the frozen fast SDE $dY_t=f(t,x,Y_t)\,dt+g(t,x,Y_t)\,dW_t^2$ and solves the nonautonomous Poisson equation $\partial_s\Phi(s,x,y)+\mathcal{L}_x(s)\Phi(s,x,\cdot)(y)=-H(s,x,y)$ by $\Phi(s,x,y)=\int_s^{\infty}\mathbb{E}H(r,x,Y_r^{s,x,y})\,dr$ for centred $H$. With the derivative bounds (2.29) this yields the strong error bound $\sup_{0\le t\le T}\mathbb{E}|X_t^\varepsilon-\bar X_t^\varepsilon|^2\le C_{T,x,y}\,\varepsilon^2[\sup_{0\le t\le T}|\Lambda_\gamma(t/\varepsilon)|^2+\int_0^{T/\varepsilon}\alpha(s)\Lambda^2(s)\,ds]$ when $\sigma\equiv\sigma(x)$ (Theorem 3.5), and the weak error bound $\sup_{0\le t\le T}|\mathbb{E}\phi(X_t^\varepsilon)-\mathbb{E}\phi(\bar X_t^\varepsilon)|\le C_{\phi,T,x,y}\,\varepsilon\sup_{t\in[0,T]}\Lambda_\gamma(t/\varepsilon)$ for general $\sigma$ (Theorem 3.9). When the fast coefficients converge to a time-homogeneous limit or are $\tau$-periodic, the averaged coefficients can be taken independent of $\varepsilon$, and the same Poisson machinery produces rates involving the convergence modulus $\varphi$ or the period $\tau$ (Theorems 4.4, 4.5, 5.3 and 5.5).

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the frozen fast equation being dissipative at a time-dependent rate $\alpha(t)$ whose two-sided integral diverges, so that an evolution system of measures exists and the nonautonomous Poisson solution can be written as an integral from $s$ to infinity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For $\alpha(t)=c_0(1+t)^{\beta}$, the strong error scales as $\varepsilon^{(1+\beta)/2}$ for $-1<\beta<1$, $\varepsilon\sqrt{\log(1/\varepsilon)}$ at $\beta=1$, and $\varepsilon$ for $\beta>1$, so time-dependent dissipation can improve or worsen the classical $\varepsilon^{1/2}$ strong order (Remark 3.7).
The weak error is of order $\varepsilon^{1+\beta}$ for $-1<\beta<0$ and of order $\varepsilon$ for $\beta\ge 0$, recovering order $1$ in the stationary case and slowing down when the dissipation decays (Remark 3.10).
In the convergent-coefficients case the error contains the convolution term $\int_0^{T/\varepsilon}(\int_0^s e^{-2\beta\alpha(s-r)}\varphi^2(r)\,dr)^{1/2}\,ds$, so the transient $\varphi$ of the fast coefficients directly sets the effective convergence rate (Theorems 4.4 and 4.5).
For $\tau$-periodic fast coefficients, the averaged equation is the period average of the $\varepsilon$-dependent averaged coefficients, with general strong order $\varepsilon^{2/3}$ and weak order $\varepsilon^{1/3}$; the strong order improves to $\varepsilon$ when $\alpha$ is constant and $\sigma\equiv 0$ with the supremum outside the expectation (Theorems 5.3 and 5.5).
Example 6.1 shows the rates are sharp: for a linear test system the mean-square error is comparable to the expression predicted by Theorem 3.5, confirming that the $\alpha$-dependent formulas are the correct leading behaviour.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same nonautonomous Poisson representation, with its derivative bounds, is exactly the input a central limit theorem and a diffusion approximation for time-inhomogeneous slow-fast systems would need; those limit theorems are a natural next step even though the paper does not state them.
The $\varepsilon$-dependence of the averaged equation in the general case is a modelling choice, not a flaw: a numerical method that wants an $\varepsilon$-free model must first know whether the fast coefficients converge or are periodic, because the two regimes lead to different error structures.
The rate formulas give a ready diagnostic for multiscale integrators: from the frozen fast coefficients one can compute $\alpha$, $\Lambda$, and $\int_0^{T/\varepsilon}\alpha(s)\Lambda^2(s)\,ds$, then use that closed-form quantity as an a priori estimate of the averaging bias before running a simulation.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: this is a serious paper, worth refereeing, but the weak averaging theorem has a load-bearing gap. The strong averaging result (Theorem 3.5) looks solid: with sigma independent of y, the Poisson-equation decomposition and the estimates do lead to the epsilon^2-bound, and Example 6.1's closed-form lower bound matching the upper rate is a strong sign the rate is right. The nonautonomous Poisson equation setup is new and should be reusable. The paper also does well to state assumptions precisely and to give two explicit examples that check the claims.

The soft spot is Theorem 3.9. Proposition 2.7 only covers H with no auxiliary parameter r, and condition (2.25) requires sup_{t,x,y}||d_x^i d_y^j H|| finite for j>=1. For F^t, the mixed derivative d_y d_r F^t is only bounded by C_T(1+|x|), so the proposition does not apply as stated, and the asserted bound on d_r Phi^t does not follow. The stress-test note is accurate. You need an extra argument differentiating the integral representation of Phi^t, using centering of d_r F^t and controlling the difference involving the frozen flow; that argument may hold but it is not in the paper. Since Theorems 4.5 and 5.5 rely on Theorem 3.9, this is not a cosmetic issue.

Other concerns are minor. Lemma 2.3 asserts x-differentiability with details omitted, but the pattern is standard and the omitted proof is likely routine. The symmetric extension to negative times in Remark 3.1 is natural but should be checked carefully. The two-sided divergence condition in A1 is restrictive, but the paper is explicit about it. The citation pattern is fine: self-citations are used as background tools, not to force the claim, and there is no circularity.

Who this is for: stochastic analysts working on averaging and homogenization, and anyone who needs explicit convergence rates for time-inhomogeneous slow-fast systems. The strong rate with the sharp example is the core takeaway; the weak rate is plausible but not proven as written.

Recommendation: send to a serious referee. Ask specifically for the missing argument in Theorem 3.9 before trusting (3.28) or the later theorems built on it.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper develops an averaging theory for the time-inhomogeneous slow-fast SDE (3.1), in which the fast component has coefficients f(t/ε,x,y), g(t/ε,x,y). Under a dissipativity condition (Assumption A1) with time-dependent rate α(·), the authors construct an evolution system of measures (Proposition 2.6) and solve nonautonomous Poisson equations of the form (2.26) with representation (2.28) and regularity estimates (2.29). These tools are applied to prove: (i) a strong mean-square error bound (Theorem 3.5) for σ(x,y)=σ(x); (ii) a weak error bound (Theorem 3.9) for general σ; (iii) averaged equations and rates when the fast coefficients converge as t→∞ (Theorems 4.4 and 4.5) or are τ-periodic (Theorems 5.3 and 5.5). The paper closes with two explicit one-dimensional examples; Example 6.1 gives an exact computation of the strong error for an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck fast component and shows the rate can be ε^{(1+β)/2}, ε(log 1/ε)^{1/2}, or ε depending on the growth of α, matching the bounds of Theorem 3.5.

Significance. The paper's main contribution is the derivation of explicit, parameter-free strong and weak averaging rates for time-inhomogeneous multi-scale SDEs, a regime where previous works (e.g., [8,40,42]) did not provide rates. The nonautonomous Poisson framework is natural and the proof itinerary is largely standard: Itô expansion, Poisson solution, martingale estimates, and Gronwall. A particular strength is that the strong rate in Theorem 3.5 is not a fitted constant bound: it is compared with an exact Gaussian computation in Example 6.1, which confirms the sharp order. The extensions to convergent and periodic fast coefficients are useful, and the dependence on the convergence profile φ(·) in Theorems 4.4 and 4.5 is new. However, the weak-rate proof in Theorem 3.9 rests on an unverified regularity statement for the parameter-dependent Poisson solution, and Lemma 2.3 omits the proof of the x-differentiability estimates on which Proposition 2.7 relies. These are load-bearing and need to be completed before the results can be accepted as established.

major comments (2)

[§3.2, Theorem 3.9 (Eqs. (3.28)–(3.29))] The statement that Proposition 2.7 'and its proof' yield a solution Φ^t of (3.29) with the displayed bound, including the term |∂_r Φ^t|, is not justified. Proposition 2.7 is stated for a single function H(s,x,y), and its proof uses condition (2.25), which requires uniform control of ∂_x^i ∂_y^j H for j≥1; it contains no statement about differentiating the solution with respect to an auxiliary parameter r. For the family F^t(r,s,x,y), the mixed derivative ∂_y ∂_r F^t is only bounded by C_T(1+|x|) by (3.26)–(3.27), and such a bound is not enough to apply Proposition 2.7 directly to obtain |∂_r Φ^t| with the factor Λ_γ(s). A separate argument differentiating (2.28) in r, using the centering of ∂_r F^t and controlling E[∂_r F^t(r,u,x,Y) - ∂_r F^t(r,u,x,η)] with a Lipschitz constant that may grow linearly in |x|, is required but absent. Since (3.28) is one of the two central claims and Theorems 4.5 and 5.5 build on it, this is a load-bearing gap.
[§2.1, Lemma 2.3 (Eq. (2.9))] The assertions that Y^{s,x,y}_t is twice mean-square differentiable in x and that sup_{t≥s} E||∂_x Y^{s,x,y}_t||^4 and sup_{t≥s} E||∂_x^2 Y^{s,x,y}_t||^2 are bounded are stated with the proof 'omitted here.' These bounds enter directly into Proposition 2.7 through the estimates for ∂_x Φ and ∂_x^2 Φ in (2.29), and hence into Theorem 3.5 and the later averaging theorems. The x-derivative equation contains additional terms involving ∂_x f, ∂_x g, ∂_y f, and ∂_y g that are not present in the y-derivative argument, so the reduction to the y-argument is not immediate. A detailed proof, or a precise statement of the analogous argument, is needed.

minor comments (4)

[Example 6.1, final display] The final display 'sup_{t∈[0,T]} E|X^ε_t - \bar X^ε_t| ≍ ...' is inconsistent with the preceding computation, which yields E|X^ε_t - \bar X_t|^2 ≍ ε^{1+β} for β<1; the square and the halved exponent are missing, and the averaged solution is denoted \bar X_t (independent of ε). Since this example is used to assert optimality, the display should be corrected.
[§3.2, Eq. (3.27)] The display (3.27) is missing a supremum over x; as written, the left-hand side still depends on x, so the displayed bound with C_T(1+|x|) is not a uniform estimate in x.
[Example 6.2] The sentence claiming that Theorems 3.5 and 3.9 imply sup |EX^ε_t - E\bar X^ε_t| ≤ Cε is not a direct consequence of Theorem 3.9, because φ(x)=x is not in C_b^4(R^n). The exact computation in the example already proves this estimate, so the reference to Theorem 3.9 should be removed or justified by an approximation argument.
[Throughout] There are numerous typographical errors: 'Grownall' for Gronwall, 't/greaterorequalslants' for t≥s, '0 ≤ i ≤ 4 and 0 ≤ i ≤ 5' in Remark 2.5 (presumably the second index is j), and the notation in (2.4) for improper integrals over (-∞,0). These should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: rate bounds are derived from the nonautonomous Poisson representation and are checked against exact computations, not fitted.

full rationale

No circularity found. The paper's central quantities—the averaged coefficients (1.5) and the error bounds (3.12), (3.28)—are not fitted to the target errors. The averaged coefficients are defined as integrals of b and sigma sigma* against the evolution system of measures {mu^x_t}, whose existence and exponential-mixing estimates are proved in Proposition 2.6 under Assumption A1. The Poisson solution Phi used in the proof is defined by the explicit representation (2.28), and all derivative estimates in Proposition 2.7 are derived from Assumptions (2.24)-(2.25) and the moment estimates of the frozen SDE, not assumed. The rate terms Lambda_gamma and Lambda arise as consequences of these estimates; Lemma 3.6 is an analytic comparison between sup |Lambda_gamma|^2 and integral alpha Lambda^2 ds, not a fit. Example 6.1 computes the strong error exactly in a one-dimensional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck-type model and confirms the general rate, which is independent support rather than circularity. The self-citations (e.g., [29], [38], [39]) motivate the technique and situate the problem; none supplies the nonautonomous Poisson theorem or the rate bounds. The only concern noted in review is an unproved extension of Proposition 2.7 to the r-dependent family F^t in Theorem 3.9, where the bound on d_r Phi^t is asserted via 'Proposition 2.7 and its proof' without a full derivation; that is a correctness gap, not a circular reduction, and the general framework still has independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims depend on structural conditions on the coefficients, not on fitted constants. The rates in Theorems 3.5 and 3.9 contain only alpha, Lambda, Lambda_gamma, T, x, and y; the periodic and convergent cases add tau and phi. This is a low-free-parameter construction.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Dissipativity and derivative bounds of f,g in Assumption A1 (equations (2.2)-(2.4)): two-sided alpha with divergent integrals and finite Lambda_gamma.
Guarantees a unique evolution system of measures via Lemma 2.4 and the nonautonomous Poisson solution (2.28).
domain assumption Boundedness and Lipschitz or regularity conditions on b and sigma in B2 and B3, including uniform ellipticity (3.20) for the weak case.
Controls remainder terms and provides fourth-order derivatives of the averaged coefficients.
domain assumption Convergence condition B4 with liminf alpha(t) > 0 and phi(t) -> 0, or tau-periodicity condition B5 for epsilon-independent averaged equations.
Selects the two regimes where the averaged coefficients have limits independent of epsilon.
domain assumption Reduction of general time dependence to coefficients depending only on t/epsilon via the augmented process (t,X_t), attributed to [29].
Restricts the class of time-inhomogeneous systems; the paper does not reprove this reduction.
standard math Standard stochastic calculus: Ito formula, Gronwall inequality, L2 Cauchy convergence, and existence of strong solutions.
Backbone of all a priori estimates and the construction of the limit process eta_t.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Averaging principles for time-inhomogeneous multi-scale SDEs via nonautonomous Poisson equations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TEUFUUY4

@misc{pith2026241209850,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Averaging principles for time-inhomogeneous multi-scale SDEs via nonautonomous Poisson equations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TEUFUUY4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.09850}
}

read the original abstract

The purpose of this paper is to establish asymptotic behaviors of time-inhomogeneous multi-scale stochastic differential equations (SDEs). To achieve them, we analyze the evolution system of measures for time-inhomogeneous Markov semigroups, and investigate regular properties of nonautonomous Poisson equations. The strong and the weak averaging principle for time-inhomogeneous multi-scale SDEs, as well as explicit convergence rates, are provided. Specifically, we show the slow component in the multi-scale stochastic system converges strongly or weakly to the solution of an averaged equation, whose coefficients retain the dependence of the scaling parameter. When the coefficients of the fast component exhibit additional asymptotic or time-periodic behaviors, we prove the slow component converges strongly or weakly to the solution of an averaged equation, whose coefficients are independent of the scaling parameter. Finally, two examples are given to indicate the effectiveness of all the averaged equations mentioned above.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Strong averaging principle for nonautonomous slow-fast SPDEs driven by $\alpha$-stable processes
math.PR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Strong L^p averaging principle with rates for nonautonomous slow-fast SPDEs driven by α-stable processes, extending prior autonomous and Gaussian-noise results.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

J. Bao, X. Sun, J. Wang and Y. Xie: Quantitative estimates for Lévy driven SDEs with diﬀerent drifts and applications, J. Diﬀerential Equations , 398 (2024), 182–217

work page 2024
[2]

J. Bao, G. Yin and C. Yuan: Two-time-scale stochastic par tial diﬀerential equations driven by α -stable noises: averaging principles, Bernoulli, 23 (2017), 645–669

work page 2017
[3]

Bertram and J.E

R. Bertram and J.E. Rubin: Multi-timescale systems and f ast-slow analysis, Math. Biosci. , 287 (2017), 105–121

work page 2017
[4]

Bogoliubov and Y.A

N.N. Bogoliubov and Y.A. Mitropolsky: Asymptotic Methods in the Theory of Non-linear Oscillation s, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, 1961

work page 1961
[5]

Bréhier: Strong and weak orders in averaging for SPD Es, Stochastic Process

C.E. Bréhier: Strong and weak orders in averaging for SPD Es, Stochastic Process. Appl., 122 (2012), 2553–2593

work page 2012
[6]

Bréhier: Orders of convergence in the averaging pri nciple for SPDEs: the case of a stochastically forced slow component, Stochastic Process

C.E. Bréhier: Orders of convergence in the averaging pri nciple for SPDEs: the case of a stochastically forced slow component, Stochastic Process. Appl. , 130 (2020), 3325–3368

work page 2020
[7]

Cerrai and M

S. Cerrai and M. Freidlin: A veraging principle for stoch astic reaction-diﬀusion equations, Probab. Theory Related Fields, 144 (2009), 137–177

work page 2009
[8]

Cerrai and A

S. Cerrai and A. Lunardi: A veraging principle for nonaut onomous slow-fast systems of stochastic reaction-diﬀusio n equations: the almost periodic case, SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 49 (2017), 2843–2884

work page 2017

Show all 45 references

[9]

P. Chen, J. Lu and L. Xu: Approximation to stochastic vari ance reduced gradient Langevin dynamics by stochastic delay diﬀerentia equations, Appl. Math. Optimization , 85 (2022), no. 15

2022
[10]

Cheng and Z

M. Cheng and Z. Liu: The second Bogolyubov theorem and gl obal averaging principle for SPDEs with monotone coeﬃcients, SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 55 (2023), 1100–1144

2023
[11]

Crisan, P

D. Crisan, P. Dobson, B. Goddard, M. Ottobre and I. Soutt ar: Poisson equations with locally-Lipschitz co- eﬃcients and uniform in time averaging for stochastic diﬀer ential equations via strong exponential stability, to appear in Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat. , arXi...

arXiv
[12]

Da Prato and M

G. Da Prato and M. Röckner: Dissipative stochastic equa tions in Hilbert space with time dependent coeﬃcients, Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Rend. Lincei Mat. Appl. , 17 (2006), 397–403

2006
[13]

Da Prato and M

G. Da Prato and M. Röckner: A note on evolution systems of measures for time-dependent stochastic diﬀerential equations, in: Seminar on Stochastic Analysis, Random Fields and Applicat ions V , 2008, 115–122

2008
[14]

Da Prato and C

G. Da Prato and C. Tudor: Periodic and almost periodic so lutions for semilinear stochastic equations, Stoch. Anal. Appl., 13 (1995), 13–33

1995
[15]

Z. Dong, X. Sun, H. Xiao and J. Zhai: A veraging principle for one dimensional stochastic Burgers equation, J. Diﬀerential Equations , 265 (2018), 4749–4797

2018
[16]

W. E and B. Engquist: Multiscale modeling and computati on, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. , 50 (2003), 1062–1070

2003
[17]

W. E, D. Liu and E. Vanden-Eijnden: Analysis of multisca le methods for stochastic diﬀerential equations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 58 (2005), 1544–1585

2005
[18]

Freidlin and A

M. Freidlin and A. Wentzell: Random Perturbations of Dynamical Systems , third edition, Springer, Heidelberg, 2012

2012
[19]

H. Fu, L. Wan and J. Liu: Strong convergence in averaging principle for stochastic hyperbolic-parabolic equations with two time-scales, Stochastic Process. Appl. , 125 (2015), 3255–3279

2015
[20]

Galtier and G

M. Galtier and G. Wainrib: Multiscale analysis of slow- fast neuronal learning models with noise, J. Math. Neurosci., 2 (2012), 1–64

2012
[21]

Gao: A veraging principle for stochastic Kuramoto-S ivashinsky equation with a fast oscillation, Discrete Con- tin

P. Gao: A veraging principle for stochastic Kuramoto-S ivashinsky equation with a fast oscillation, Discrete Con- tin. Dyn. Syst. A , 38 (2018), 5649–5684

2018
[22]

Givon, I

D. Givon, I. G. Kevrekidis and R. Kupferman: Strong conv ergence of projective integeration schemes for singu- larly perturbed stochastic diﬀerential systems, Comm. Math. Sci. , 4 (2006), 707–729

2006
[23]

Gradinaru and Y

M. Gradinaru and Y. Oﬀret: Existence and asymptotic beh aviour of some time-inhomogeneous diﬀusions, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Probab. Statist. , 49 (2013), 182–207

2013
[24]

Hairer and X.-M

M. Hairer and X.-M. Li, A veraging dynamics driven by fra ctional Brownian motion, Ann. Probab., 48 (2020), 1826–1860

2020
[25]

W. Hong, S. Li, W. Liu and X. Sun: Central limit type theor em and large deviations principle for multi-scale McKean-Vlasov SDEs, Probab. Theory Related Fields , 187 (2023), 133–201

2023
[26]

Khasminskii: On an averaging principle for Itô sto chastic diﬀerential equations, Kibernetica, 4 (1968), 260–279

R.Z. Khasminskii: On an averaging principle for Itô sto chastic diﬀerential equations, Kibernetica, 4 (1968), 260–279. A VERAGING PRINCIPLES FOR TIME-INHOMOGENEOUS MULTI-SCALE SDES 39

1968
[27]

Khasminskii: Stochastic Stability of Diﬀerential Equations , second edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidel- berg, 2012

R.Z. Khasminskii: Stochastic Stability of Diﬀerential Equations , second edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidel- berg, 2012

2012
[28]

Liu: Strong convergence of principle of averaging fo r multiscale stochastic dynamical systems, Commun

D. Liu: Strong convergence of principle of averaging fo r multiscale stochastic dynamical systems, Commun. Math. Sci. , 8 (2010), 999–1020

2010
[29]

W. Liu, M. Röckner, X. Sun and Y. Xie: A veraging principl e for slow-fast stochastic diﬀerential equations with time dependent locally Lipschitz coeﬃcients, J. Diﬀerential Equations , 268 (2020), 2910–2948

2020
[30]

Pardoux and A.Y

E. Pardoux and A.Y. Veretennikov: On the Poisson equati on and diﬀusion approximation. I, Ann. Probab., 29 (2001), 1061–1085

2001
[31]

Pardoux and A.Y

E. Pardoux and A.Y. Veretennikov: On the Poisson equati on and diﬀusion approximation. 2, Ann. Probab., 31 (2003), 1166–1192

2003
[32]

Pardoux and A.Y

E. Pardoux and A.Y. Veretennikov: On the Poisson equati on and diﬀusion approximation. 3, Ann. Probab., 33 (2005), 1111–1133

2005
[33]

Pavliotis and A.M

G.A. Pavliotis and A.M. Stuart: Multiscale Methods: Averaging and Homogenization , Springer, New York, 2008

2008
[34]

B. Pei, Y. Xu and J.L. Wu: Two-time-scales hyperbolic-p arabolic equations driven by Poisson random measures: existence, uniqueness and averaging principles, J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 447 (2017), 243–268

2017
[35]

Röckner, X

M. Röckner, X. Sun and Y. Xie: Strong convergence order f or slow-fast McKean-Vlasov stochastic diﬀerential equations, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat. , 57 (2021), 547–576

2021
[36]

Röckner and L

M. Röckner and L. Xie: Diﬀusion approximation for fully coupled stochastic diﬀerential equations, Ann. Probab., 49 (2021), 1205–1236

2021
[37]

G. Shen, J. Xiang and J. Wu: A veraging principle for dist ribution dependent stochastic diﬀerential equations driven by fractional Brownian motion and standard Brownian motion, J. Diﬀerential Equations , 321 (2022), 381–414

2022
[38]

Sun and Y

X. Sun and Y. Xie: Orders of strong and weak averaging pri nciple for multi-scale SPDEs driven by α -stable process, J. Diﬀerential Equations , 351 (2023), 194–242

2023
[39]

X. Sun, L. Xie and Y. Xie: Strong and weak convergence rat es for slow-fast stochastic diﬀerential equations driven by α -stable process, Bernoulli, 28 (2022), 343–369

2022
[40]

Uda: A veraging principle for stochastic diﬀerentia l equations in the random periodic regime, Stochastic Process

K. Uda: A veraging principle for stochastic diﬀerentia l equations in the random periodic regime, Stochastic Process. Appl., 139 (2021), 1–36

2021
[41]

Veretennikov: On the averaging principle for syst ems of stochastic diﬀerential equations, Math

A.Y. Veretennikov: On the averaging principle for syst ems of stochastic diﬀerential equations, Math. USSR Sborn., 69 (1991), 271–284

1991
[42]

Wainrib: Double averaging principle for periodical ly forced slow-fast stochastic systems, Electron

G. Wainrib: Double averaging principle for periodical ly forced slow-fast stochastic systems, Electron. Commun. Probab., 18 (2013), 1–12

2013
[43]

Wang and A.J

W. Wang and A.J. Roberts: A verage and deviation for slow -fast stochastic partial diﬀerential equations, J. Diﬀerential Equations , 253 (2012), 1265–1286

2012
[44]

F. Wu, T. Tian, J.B. Rawlings and G. Yin: Approximate met hod for stochastic chemical kinetics with two-time scales by chemical Langevin equations, J. Chem. Phys. , 144 (2016), no. 174112

2016
[45]

J. Xu, Y. Miao and J. Liu: Strong averaging principle for slow-fast SPDEs with Poisson random measures, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B , 20 (2015), 2233–2256. Current address , Sun, X.: School of Mathematics and Statistics/RIMS, Jiang su Normal University, Xuzhou, 221116, ...

2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

J. Bao, X. Sun, J. Wang and Y. Xie: Quantitative estimates for Lévy driven SDEs with diﬀerent drifts and applications, J. Diﬀerential Equations , 398 (2024), 182–217

work page 2024

[2] [2]

J. Bao, G. Yin and C. Yuan: Two-time-scale stochastic par tial diﬀerential equations driven by α -stable noises: averaging principles, Bernoulli, 23 (2017), 645–669

work page 2017

[3] [3]

Bertram and J.E

R. Bertram and J.E. Rubin: Multi-timescale systems and f ast-slow analysis, Math. Biosci. , 287 (2017), 105–121

work page 2017

[4] [4]

Bogoliubov and Y.A

N.N. Bogoliubov and Y.A. Mitropolsky: Asymptotic Methods in the Theory of Non-linear Oscillation s, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, 1961

work page 1961

[5] [5]

Bréhier: Strong and weak orders in averaging for SPD Es, Stochastic Process

C.E. Bréhier: Strong and weak orders in averaging for SPD Es, Stochastic Process. Appl., 122 (2012), 2553–2593

work page 2012

[6] [6]

Bréhier: Orders of convergence in the averaging pri nciple for SPDEs: the case of a stochastically forced slow component, Stochastic Process

C.E. Bréhier: Orders of convergence in the averaging pri nciple for SPDEs: the case of a stochastically forced slow component, Stochastic Process. Appl. , 130 (2020), 3325–3368

work page 2020

[7] [7]

Cerrai and M

S. Cerrai and M. Freidlin: A veraging principle for stoch astic reaction-diﬀusion equations, Probab. Theory Related Fields, 144 (2009), 137–177

work page 2009

[8] [8]

Cerrai and A

S. Cerrai and A. Lunardi: A veraging principle for nonaut onomous slow-fast systems of stochastic reaction-diﬀusio n equations: the almost periodic case, SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 49 (2017), 2843–2884

work page 2017