pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.25712 · v2 · pith:TG4K76D4new · submitted 2026-04-28 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Exact results for the Hubbard model on bipartite lattices in spatial dimensions d>1: Seven theorems from the full [SU(2)timesSU(2)timesU(1)]/mathbb{Z}₂² symmetry

J. M. P. Carmelo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 23:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords Hubbard modelbipartite latticesexact theoremsSU(2) symmetryeta-spinselectron correlationscondensed matter
0
0 comments X

The pith

The full [SU(2)×SU(2)×U(1)]/Z₂² symmetry of the Hubbard model on bipartite lattices in d>1 yields seven exact theorems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes seven exact theorems for the Hubbard model with parameters t and U on bipartite lattices such as the square, honeycomb, and cubic ones when the spatial dimension exceeds one. It derives these results directly from the model's complete symmetry group that incorporates both spin and eta-spin degrees of freedom. A sympathetic reader cares because few exact results exist for this model in d>1, yet it remains the basic description of electron correlations in real materials. The theorems supply concrete constraints on the model's behavior without relying on approximations. The resulting framework then supports further exact analysis of systems like cuprate superconductors and graphene.

Core claim

The paper establishes seven exact theorems that follow from the full [SU(2)×SU(2)×U(1)]/Z₂² symmetry for the Hubbard model with transfer integral t and onsite repulsion U on bipartite lattices with N_a sites in spatial dimensions d>1. These theorems provide new physical insight into the model, which serves as the simplest toy model for electronic correlations in condensed-matter systems.

What carries the argument

The full [SU(2)×SU(2)×U(1)]/Z₂² symmetry group realized exactly on the bipartite lattices, which organizes physical spins and physical η-spins to produce the seven theorems.

If this is right

  • The theorems apply directly to the square, honeycomb, cubic, body-centered cubic, face-centered cubic, and diamond lattices.
  • Physical spins and physical η-spins furnish the exact framework that yields the theorems.
  • The results supply a foundation for future exact studies of the Hubbard model and the condensed-matter materials it describes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The theorems could serve as benchmarks for testing numerical methods on the Hubbard model in higher dimensions.
  • Similar symmetry analysis might extend to variants of the model that include next-nearest-neighbor hopping.
  • Ground-state properties in these lattices become more constrained once the theorems are imposed.
  • Connections to other lattice models sharing related symmetries could be investigated.

Load-bearing premise

The full symmetry group is realized exactly on the bipartite lattices considered, without additional terms or boundary effects that would break it.

What would settle it

A concrete counter-example on one of the listed lattices in d>1 that violates any of the seven theorems would falsify the symmetry-based derivation.

read the original abstract

There are few exact results for the Hubbard model on bipartite lattices of spatial dimension $d>1$. Nevertheless, the Hubbard model with transfer integral $t$ and onsite repulsion $U$ on bipartite lattices with $N_a$ sites, such as the square, honeycomb, cubic, body-centered cubic, face-centered cubic, and diamond lattices, provides the simplest toy model for describing electronic correlations in many condensed-matter systems and is therefore a quantum problem of considerable physical interest. Seven exact theorems that provide new physical insight into the model are established. Overall, the exact framework based on physical spins and physical $\eta$-spins for the Hubbard model on bipartite lattices of spatial dimension $d>1$ introduced in this paper offers a robust foundation for future studies of the model, as well as of the condensed-matter materials, such as cuprate superconductors, graphene and graphene-derived systems, and other quantum systems, that it describes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to establish seven exact theorems for the Hubbard model with parameters t and U on bipartite lattices (square, honeycomb, cubic, etc.) in spatial dimensions d>1. These theorems are derived from the full [SU(2)×SU(2)×U(1)]/ℤ₂² symmetry and are said to yield new physical insights; the overall framework based on physical spins and physical η-spins is presented as a robust foundation for future studies of the model and of materials such as cuprates and graphene.

Significance. If the theorems are rigorously established, the work would supply much-needed exact results for the Hubbard model in d>1, where few such results exist. The symmetry-based, parameter-free derivation is a clear strength and could serve as a foundation for analyzing correlated systems without reliance on approximations or numerical fitting.

major comments (1)
  1. [Symmetry framework paragraph] Symmetry-framework paragraph (and abstract): the claim that the full [SU(2)×SU(2)×U(1)]/ℤ₂² symmetry is realized exactly is treated as given, yet no explicit verification is provided that the η-pairing operators commute with the Hamiltonian for finite Na-site lattices under open or irregular boundary conditions. Because the bipartite sublattice structure is not uniformly preserved at edges, this omission is load-bearing for all seven theorems.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that 'seven exact theorems' are established but does not enumerate them or point to the sections containing their derivations; an explicit list with cross-references would improve readability.
  2. Notation for the quotient group ℤ₂² should be introduced with a brief reminder of its physical meaning when first used in the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for acknowledging the potential value of exact results for the Hubbard model in d>1. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Symmetry-framework paragraph (and abstract): the claim that the full [SU(2)×SU(2)×U(1)]/ℤ₂² symmetry is realized exactly is treated as given, yet no explicit verification is provided that the η-pairing operators commute with the Hamiltonian for finite Na-site lattices under open or irregular boundary conditions. Because the bipartite sublattice structure is not uniformly preserved at edges, this omission is load-bearing for all seven theorems.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of the commutation relations would improve the manuscript's rigor. The η-pairing operators commute with the Hubbard Hamiltonian on any bipartite lattice (including finite Na-site systems) because the kinetic term only connects opposite sublattices and the interaction is strictly onsite; this algebraic property is independent of boundary conditions provided the underlying graph remains bipartite. For standard open boundaries on square, honeycomb, or cubic lattices the bipartition is preserved at the edges. We will add a new appendix containing the explicit commutator calculations for representative open-boundary cases and a brief discussion of irregular boundaries that preserve bipartiteness. This revision directly addresses the concern and reinforces the foundation for all seven theorems. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation self-contained: theorems follow from symmetry without reduction to inputs by construction

full rationale

The paper introduces an exact framework based on physical spins and physical η-spins for the Hubbard model on bipartite lattices in d>1 and derives seven theorems directly from the full [SU(2)×SU(2)×U(1)]/Z₂² symmetry. No load-bearing step reduces a prediction or theorem to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or definitional equivalence; the symmetry is stated as realized exactly on the lattices considered, and the theorems are presented as consequences rather than renamings or ansatzes smuggled via prior work. The derivation chain is independent of the target results and does not invoke uniqueness theorems from overlapping authors as external facts. This is the standard, non-circular structure for symmetry-based exact results in quantum many-body physics.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the stated symmetry group is exact for the model on the listed lattices. No free parameters or invented entities appear in the abstract. Axioms are the standard properties of the Hubbard Hamiltonian plus the symmetry realization.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The Hubbard model Hamiltonian on bipartite lattices realizes the full [SU(2)×SU(2)×U(1)]/Z₂² symmetry exactly.
    Invoked in the abstract as the source of the seven theorems.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5723 in / 1222 out tokens · 26304 ms · 2026-05-20T23:56:18.911977+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

119 extracted references · 119 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ifh >0, the ground state is a spin highest-weight state,S z s =S s; ifh <0, it is a spin lowest-weight state,S z s =−S s

    work page

  2. [2]

    In particular, external fields select extremal SU(2) weights but do not mix SU(2) multiplets

    Ifµ >0, the ground state is aη-spin highest-weight state,S z η =S η; ifµ <0, it is aη-spin lowest-weight state,S z η =−S η. In particular, external fields select extremal SU(2) weights but do not mix SU(2) multiplets. Proof 1 - Symmetry and labeling of eigenstates Since the Hamiltonian, Eq. (2), obeys the commuta- tion relations given in Eq. (18), energy ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    The number of irreducible representations ofthe global [SO(4)×U(1)]/Z2 symmetry is Na+3 3

    work page

  4. [4]

    For any fixed signs ofhandµ, each irreducible representation contains exactly one weight subspace (Sz s , Sz η) that hosts the ground state of ˆHfields

    work page

  5. [5]

    edge length

    Consequently, the number of distinct ground-state- selecting (S z s , Sz η) Hilbert-space sectors equals the num- ber of irreducible representations of the global symmetry, number ground−state sectors = Na + 3 3 .(36) Proof 1 - Classification of irreducible representations The relationsN s = (N a −2S τ) andN η = 2S τ imply that 2Ss = (Na −2S τ −N 0 s ) an...

    work page 1989

  6. [6]

    (19), involves the exact energy and momentum eigenstates, the computation of which remains a com- plex, unsolved problem for spatial dimensionsd >1 and allu >0

    Theu-unitary operator ˆVu that defines the quasipar- ticle operators ˜c† ⃗ rj ,σ = ˆV † u c† ⃗ rj ,σ ˆVu and ˜c⃗ rj ,σ = ˆV † u c⃗ rj ,σ ˆVu, Eq. (19), involves the exact energy and momentum eigenstates, the computation of which remains a com- plex, unsolved problem for spatial dimensionsd >1 and allu >0

    work page

  7. [7]

    (15), but a simple form in terms of quasiparticle operators, Eq

    The generator of theτ-translational U(1) symmetry contains an infinite number of terms when expressed in terms of electron operators, Eq. (15), but a simple form in terms of quasiparticle operators, Eq. (21). The second limitation is that, conversely, the Hamiltonian has a simple expression in terms of electron operators, Eq. (2), but an infinite number o...

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Gutzwiller, Effect of correlation on the ferromag- netism of transition metals, Phys

    M. Gutzwiller, Effect of correlation on the ferromag- netism of transition metals, Phys. Rev. Lett.10, 159 (1963)

    work page 1963

  9. [9]

    Hubbard, Electron correlations in narrow energy bands, Proc

    J. Hubbard, Electron correlations in narrow energy bands, Proc. R. Soc. London A276, 238 (1963)

    work page 1963

  10. [10]

    Hubbard, Electron correlations in narrow energy bands

    J. Hubbard, Electron correlations in narrow energy bands. II. The degenerate band case, Proc. R. Soc. Lon- don A277, 237 (1964)

    work page 1964

  11. [11]

    P. W. Anderson, The resonating valence bond state in La 2CuO2 and superconductivity, Science235, 1196 (1987)

    work page 1987

  12. [12]

    F. C. Zhang and T. M. Rice, Effective Hamiltonian for the superconducting Cu oxides, Phys. Rev. B37, 3759 (1988)

    work page 1988

  13. [13]

    P. A. Lee and N. Nagaosa, Gauge theory of the normal state of high-Tc superconductors, Phys. Rev. B46, 5621 (1992)

    work page 1992

  14. [14]

    Dagotto, Correlated electrons in high-temperature superconductors, Rev

    E. Dagotto, Correlated electrons in high-temperature superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.66, 763 (1994)

    work page 1994

  15. [15]

    S. M. Hayden, G. Aeppli, H. A. Mook, T. G. Perring, T. E. Mason, S.-W. Cheong, and Z. Fisk, Comparison of the high-frequency magnetic fluctuations in insulating and superconducting La 2−xSrxCuO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1344 (1996)

    work page 1996

  16. [16]

    Imada, A

    M. Imada, A. Fujimori, and Y. Tokura, Metal-insulator transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys.70, 1039 (1998)

    work page 1998

  17. [17]

    C.-M. Ho, V. N. Muthukumar, M. Ogata, and P. W. Anderson, Nature of spin excitations in two-dimensional Mott insulators: Undoped cuprates and other materials, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 1626 (2001)

    work page 2001

  18. [18]

    Sorella, G

    S. Sorella, G. B. Martins, and F. Becca, Supercon- ductivity in the Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 117002 (2002)

    work page 2002

  19. [19]

    Damascelli, Z

    A. Damascelli, Z. Hussain, and Z.-X. Shen, Angle- resolved photoemission studies of the cuprate supercon- ductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 473 (2003)

    work page 2003

  20. [20]

    Maier, M

    T. Maier, M. Jarrell, T. Pruschke, and M. H. Hettler, Quantum cluster theories, Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 1027 (2005)

    work page 2005

  21. [21]

    P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, and X.-G. Wen, Doping a Mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductiv- ity, Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 17 (2006)

    work page 2006

  22. [22]

    T. A. Maier, D. Poilblanc, and D. J. Scalapino, Dy- namics of the pairing interaction in the Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 237001 (2008)

    work page 2008

  23. [23]

    Comanac, L

    A. Comanac, L. de Medici, M. Capone, and A. J. Mil- lis, Optical conductivity and the correlation strength of high-temperature copper-oxide superconductors, Nat. Phys.4, 287 (2008)

    work page 2008

  24. [24]

    R. S. Markiewicz, J. Lorenzana, and G. Seibold, Gutzwiller magnetic phase diagram of the undoped t−t ′ −UHubbard model, Phys. Rev. B81, 014510 (2010)

    work page 2010

  25. [25]

    T. Das, R. S. Markiewicz, and A. Bansil, Optical model- solution to the competition between a pseudogap phase and a charge-transfer-gap phase in high-temperature cuprate superconductors, Phys. Rev. B81, 174504 (2010)

    work page 2010

  26. [26]

    R. S. Markiewicz, T. Das, and A. Bansil, Failure of t-J models in describing doping evolution of spectral weight in x-ray scattering, optical, and photoemission spectra of cuprates, Phys. Rev. B82, 224501 (2010)

    work page 2010

  27. [27]

    E. Gull, M. Ferrero, O. Parcollet, A. Georges, and A. J. Millis, Momentum-space anisotropy and pseudogaps: A comparative cluster dynamical mean-field analysis of the doping-driven metal-insulator transition in the two- dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B82, 155101 (2010)

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    D. J. Scalapino, A common thread: The pairing inter- action for unconventional superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 1383 (2012)

    work page 2012

  29. [29]

    J. M. P. Carmelo, M. A. N. Ara´ ujo, S. R. White, and M. J. Sampaio, Hubbard-model description of the high- energy spin-spectral-weight distribution in La 2CuO4, Phys. Rev. B86, 064520 (2012)

    work page 2012

  30. [30]

    Seibold, M

    G. Seibold, M. Grilli, and J. Lorenzana, Stripes in cuprate superconductors: Excitations and dynamic di- chotomy, Physica C481, 132 (2012)

    work page 2012

  31. [31]

    T. Das, R. S. Markiewicz, and A. Bansil, Intermedi- ate coupling model of the cuprates, Adv. Phys.63, 151 (2014)

    work page 2014

  32. [32]

    J. P. F. LeBlanc, A. E. Antipov, F. Becca, I. W. Bulik, G. K.-L. Chan, C.-M. Chung, Y. Deng, M. Ferrero, T. M. Henderson, C. A. Jim´ enez-Hoyos, E. Kozik, X.-W. Liu, A. J. Millis, N. V. Prokof´ ev, M. Qin, G. E. Scuseria, H. Shi, B. V. Svistunov, L. F. Tocchio, I. S. Tupitsyn, S. R. White, S. Zhang, B.-X. Zheng, Z. Zhu, and E. Gull, Solutions of the two-d...

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    B. D. Piazza, M. Mourigal, N. B. Christensen, G. J. Nilsen, P. Tregenna-Piggott, T. G. Perring, M. Enderle, 22 D. F. McMorrow, D. A. Ivanov, and H. M. Rønnow, Fractional Excitations in the Square-lattice quantum antiferromagnet, Nat. Phys.11, 62 (2015)

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    R. S. Markiewicz, G. Seibold, J. Lorenzana, and A. Ban- sil, Gutzwiller charge phase diagram of cuprates, includ- ing electron-phonon coupling effects, New J. Phys.17 023074 (2015)

    work page 2015

  35. [35]

    Sch¨ afer, N

    T. Sch¨ afer, N. Wentzell, F.ˇSimkovic IV, Y.-Y. He, C. Hille, M. Klett, C. J. Eckhardt, B. Arzhang, V. Harkov, F.-M. Le R´ egent, A. Kirsch, Y. Wang, A. J. Kim, E. Kozik, E. A. Stepanov, A. Kauch, S. Andergassen, P. Hansmann, D. Rohe, Y. M. Vilk, J. P. F. LeBlanc, S. Zhang, A.-M. S. Tremblay, M. Ferrero, O. Parcollet, and A. Georges, Tracking the footpri...

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Kumar Singh and Y

    D. Kumar Singh and Y. Ban, Effect of strain-induced orbital splitting on the magnetic excitations in undoped cuprates, Phys. Rev. B103, 035122 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Martinelli, D

    L. Martinelli, D. Betto, K. Kummer, R. Arpaia, L. Braicovich, D. Di Castro, N. B. Brookes, M. M. Sala, and G. Ghiringhelli, Fractional spin excitations in the infinite-layer cuprate CaCuO2, Phys. Rev. X12, 021041 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    V. K. Singh, K. Nam, M. Barik, K. Boya, E. Ker- marrec, P. Khuntia, K. H. Kim, S. Bhowal, and B. Koteswararao, Bi2YbO4Cl: A two-dimensional square- lattice compound withJ eff = 1 2 magnetic moments, Phys. Rev. B109, 075128 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Q. Wang, S. Musta, E. Fogh, N. Astrakhantsev, Z. He, I. Biao, Y. Chan, L. Martinelli, M. Horio, O. Ivashko, N. E. Shaik, K. von Arx, Y. Sassa, E. Paris, M. H. Fischer, Y. Tseng, N. B. Christensen, A. Galdi, D. G. Schlom, K. M. Shen, T. Schmitt, H. M. Rønnow, and J. Chang, Magnon interactions in a moderately correlated Mott insulator, Nature Comm.15, 5348 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Singh, H

    A. Singh, H. Y. Huang, K. Tsutsui, T. Tohyama, S. Komiya, J. Okamoto, C. T. Chen, A. Fujimori, and D. J. Huang, Bimagnon dispersion of La 2CuO4 probed by resonant inelastic X-ray scattering, Scient. Rep.15, 34183 (2025)

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    J. Bao, M. Gohlke, J. G. Rau, and N. Shannon, Magnon spectra of cuprates beyond spin wave theory, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L012053 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    Schumm, S

    G. Schumm, S. Zhang, and A. W. Sandvik, Single- particle dispersion and density of states of the half-filled two-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B112, 085109 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Sorella and E

    S. Sorella and E. Tosatti, Semi-metal-insulator transi- tion of the Hubbard model in the honeycomb lattice, Europhys. Lett.19, 699 (1992)

    work page 1992

  44. [44]

    Gonz´ alez, F

    J. Gonz´ alez, F. Guinea, and M. A. H. Vozmediano, Electron-electron interactions in graphene sheets, Phys. Rev. B63, 134421 (2001)

    work page 2001

  45. [45]

    A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, The electronic properties of graphene, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 109 (2009)

    work page 2009

  46. [46]

    Kotov, B

    M. Kotov, B. Uchoa, V. Pereira, A. Castro Neto, and F. Guinea, Electron-electron interactions in graphene: Current status and perspectives, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 1067 (2012)

    work page 2012

  47. [47]

    M. I. Katsnelson,Graphene: carbon in two dimensions, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, 2012)

    work page 2012

  48. [48]

    F. F. Assaad and I. F. Herbut, Pinning the order: The nature of quantum criticality in the Hubbard model on honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. X3, 031010 (2013)

    work page 2013

  49. [49]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo- Herrero, Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature556, 80 (2018)

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    Parra-Mart´ ınez, A

    G. Parra-Mart´ ınez, A. Jimeno-Pozo. V. T. Phong, H. Sainz-Cruz, D. Kaplan, P. Emanuel, Y. Oreg, P. A. Pantale´ on, J.´A. Silva-Guill´ en, and F. Guinea, Band renormalization, quarter metals, and chiral supercon- ductivity in rhombohedral tetralayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 136503 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    K¨ ohl, H

    M. K¨ ohl, H. Moritz, T. St¨ oferle, K. G¨ unter, and T. Esslinger, Fermionic atoms in a three dimensional op- tical lattice: observing Fermi surfaces, dynamics, and interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 080403 (2005)

    work page 2005

  52. [52]

    J¨ ordens, N

    R. J¨ ordens, N. Strohmaier, K. G¨ unter, H. Moritz, and T. Esslinger, A Mott insulator of fermionic atoms in an optical lattice, Nature (London)455, 204 (2008)

    work page 2008

  53. [53]

    Schneider, L

    U. Schneider, L. Hackermuller, S. Will, Th. Best, I. Bloch, T. A. Costi, R. W. Helmes, D. Rasch, and A. Rosch, Metallic and insulating phases of repulsively in- teracting fermions in a 3D optical lattice, Science322, 1520 (2008)

    work page 2008

  54. [54]

    Strohmaier, D

    N. Strohmaier, D. Greif, R. J¨ ordens, L. Tarruell, H. Moritz, and T. Esslinger, Observation of elastic doublon decay in the Fermi-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 080401 (2010)

    work page 2010

  55. [55]

    Sensarma, D

    R. Sensarma, D. Pekker, E. Altman, E. Demler, N. Strohmaier, D. Greif, R. J¨ ordens, L. Tarruell, H. Moritz, and T. Esslinger, Lifetime of double occupancies in the Fermi-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B82, 224302 (2010)

    work page 2010

  56. [56]

    Nagaoka, Ferromagnetism in a narrow, almost half- filledsband, Phys

    Y. Nagaoka, Ferromagnetism in a narrow, almost half- filledsband, Phys. Rev.147, 392 (1966)

    work page 1966

  57. [57]

    E. H. Lieb, Two theorems on the Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 1201 (1989)

    work page 1989

  58. [58]

    Theorie” and “Matrizen

    O. Perron, “Theorie” and “Matrizen”, Math. Ann.64, 248 (1907)

    work page 1907

  59. [59]

    Matrizen

    G. Frobenius, “Matrizen” and “Elementen”, Sitzungs- ber. Kgl. Preuss. Akad. Wiss.Januar bis Juni, 456 (1912)

    work page 1912

  60. [60]

    C. N. Yangηpairing and off-diagonal long-range order in a Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.63, 2144 (1989)

    work page 1989

  61. [61]

    C. N. Yang and S. Zhang, SO(4) Symmetry in a Hub- bard model, Mod. Phys. Lett. B4, 759 (1990)

    work page 1990

  62. [62]

    Demler, W

    E. Demler, W. Hanke, and S.-C. Zhang, SO(5) theory of antiferromagnetism and superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys.76, 909 (2004)

    work page 2004

  63. [63]

    Masumizu and K

    A. Masumizu and K. Sogo, Ward-Takahashi relations for SO(4) symmetry in the Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B72, 115107 (2005)

    work page 2005

  64. [64]

    R. A. Hart, P. M. Duarte, T.-L. Yang, X. Liu, T. Paiva, E. Khatami, R. T. Scalettar, N. Trivedi, D. A. Huse, and R. G. Hulet, Observation of antiferromagnetic cor- relations in the Hubbard model with ultracold atoms, Nature519, 211 (2015)

    work page 2015

  65. [65]

    Mazurenko, C

    A. Mazurenko, C. S. Chiu, G. Ji, M. F. Parsons, M. Kanasz-Nagy, R. Schmidt, F. Grusdt, E. Demler, D. Greif, and M. Greiner, A cold-atom Fermi-Hubbard an- tiferromagnet, Nature545, 462 (2017)

    work page 2017

  66. [66]

    P. T. Brown, D. Mitra, E. Guardado-Sanchez, P. 23 Schauss, S. S. Kondov, E. Khatami, T. Paiva, N. Trivedi, D. A. Huse, and W. S. Bak, Spin-imbalance in a 2D Fermi-Hubbard system, Science357, 1385 (2017)

    work page 2017

  67. [67]

    M. Fava, B. Ware, S. Gopalakrishnan, R. Vasseur, and S. A. Parameswaran, Spin crossovers and superdiffusion in the one-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 102, 115121 (2020)

    work page 2020

  68. [68]

    C. P. Moca, M. A. Werne, A. Valli, T. Prosen, and G. Zar´ and, Kardar-Parisi-Zhang scaling in the Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B108, 235139 (2023)

    work page 2023

  69. [69]

    Shen, Z.-M

    S.-Q. Shen, Z.-M. Qiu, and G.-S. Tian, Ferrimagnetic long-range order of the Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 1280 (1994)

    work page 1994

  70. [70]

    ¨Ostlund and E

    S. ¨Ostlund and E. Mele, Local canonical transforma- tions of fermions, Phys. Rev. B44, 12413 (1991)

    work page 1991

  71. [71]

    J. M. P. Carmelo, S. ¨Ostlund, and M. J. Sampaio, Global SO(3)×SO(3)×U(1) symmetry of the Hubbard model on bipartite lattices, Ann. Phys.325, 1550 (2010)

    work page 2010

  72. [72]

    E. H. Lieb, F. Y. Wu, Absence of Mott transition in an exact solution of the short-range one-band model in one dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett.20, 1445 (1968)

    work page 1968

  73. [73]

    E. H. Lieb and F. Y. Wu, The one-dimensional Hubbard model: A reminiscence, Physica A321, 1 (2003)

    work page 2003

  74. [74]

    Takahashi, One-dimensional Hubbard model at fi- nite temperature, Progr

    M. Takahashi, One-dimensional Hubbard model at fi- nite temperature, Progr. Theor. Phys47, 69 (1972)

    work page 1972

  75. [75]

    P. B. Ramos and M. J. Martins, Algebraic Bethe ansatz approach for the one-dimensional Hubbard model, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.30, L195 (1997)

    work page 1997

  76. [76]

    M. J. Martins and P. B. Ramos, The quantum inverse scattering method for Hubbard-like models, Nucl. Phys. B522, 413 (1998)

    work page 1998

  77. [77]

    F. H. L. Essler, H. Frahm, F. G¨ ohmann, A. Kl¨ umper, and V. E. Korepin,The one-dimensional Hubbard model (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2005)

    work page 2005

  78. [78]

    J. M. P. Carmelo and J. E. C. Carmelo, Finite- temperature charge and spin transport in the 1D Hubbard model accounting for its global [SU (2)×SU(2)×U(1)]/Z2 2 symmetry, Phys. Rev. B111, 115157 (2025)

    work page 2025

  79. [79]

    J. M. P. Carmelo and P. D. Sacramento, Tempera- ture dependence of charge transport in the half-filled one-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B110, L201108 (2024)

    work page 2024

  80. [80]

    J. M. P. Carmelo and P. D. Sacramento, Diffusive charge transport in the gapped one-dimensional Hub- bard model at all finite temperatures, Phys. Rev. B111, L241117 (2025)

    work page 2025

Showing first 80 references.