Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 53 references

Nonequilibrium transport through the Hubbard dimer

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A time-linear iGKBA simulation with a fan of narrow-band leads reads the Hubbard dimer's time- and energy-resolved spectrum from lead currents, revealing correlation-induced shifts, broadenings, and damping of transient oscillations.

desk verdict A neat linear-time trick for energy-resolved spectra, but the key assumption that correlated probe currents reflect the spectral function is under-justified. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.02198 v1 pith:TG5CSMON submitted 2025-06-02 cond-mat.str-el

Yaroslav Pavlyukh , Riku Tuovinen This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords HubbarddimernonequilibriumGreen'sfunctionsiGKBAtime-linearscalingquantumtransportphotoemissionsecondBornapproximationtransientcurrents
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the time- and energy-resolved spectrum of a correlated open quantum system can be obtained from a time-linear simulation, without solving the expensive two-time Kadanoff-Baym equations. The idea is to attach a fan of narrow-band leads at different energies and read the current through them, in direct analogy to a photoemission detector. Applying the iterated generalized Kadanoff-Baym ansatz (iGKBA) to the Hubbard dimer, the authors find correlation-induced shifts and broadenings of spectral peaks and suppression of transient current oscillations compared with Hartree-Fock. If the mapping holds, spectral probes of correlated electron dynamics become computable at linear cost.

What carries the argument

The central object is the iterated generalized Kadanoff-Baym ansatz (iGKBA), which reconstructs the lesser and greater Green's functions beyond the standard GKBA and beyond the wide-band limit at the cost of co-propagating auxiliary embedding correlators with the density matrix. The paper combines this with Lorentzian-shaped tunneling rates that model narrow-band leads as energy-selective detectors, and a generalized Meir-Wingreen formula for the current. This replaces the full two-time Kadanoff-Baym equations, which scale cubically in time, with ordinary differential equations whose cost is linear in propagation time.

What would settle it

Compute the exact spectral function of the U=10 dimer by exact diagonalization and compare its peak positions and widths with the sublead currents J1(ε1) at sublead width 0.1; any disagreement beyond the lead width would show the probe current is not simply the interacting spectrum.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that spectral information about a correlated open quantum system can be obtained from a single time-linear propagation by coupling the system to many narrow-band leads and reading the stationary current through each sublead. For the Hubbard dimer, the authors show that at the Hartree-Fock level these energy-resolved currents reproduce the Landauer-Büttiker result, while at the second-Born level the same currents carry correlation physics: the spectral peaks broaden, their positions shift as the density evolves, and the transient current oscillations that appear in Hartree-Fock are suppressed. This is presented as a direct computational analogue of a photoemission experiment, with the narrow-band leads acting as energy-selective detectors.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes the steady current through a narrow-band probe lead faithfully represents the interacting spectral function of the dimer, even though the relation between J1(ε1) and A(ω) is established only for noninteracting (Landauer-Büttiker) systems.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For the Hubbard dimer, both the Hartree-Fock and second-Born energy-resolved currents can be produced in a single time-linear run, so the spectrum at many detector energies costs no more than the propagation itself.
  • At the second-Born level the current peaks are broader than the Hartree-Fock ones and their positions drift as the dimer's occupation changes, so the transient spectrum and the density must be read together.
  • The transient current oscillations seen at the Hartree-Fock level are suppressed by correlation, matching the damping seen in full Kadanoff-Baym treatments of Hubbard clusters.
  • Because many subleads cover the energy window at once, the setup behaves like a parallel photoemission detector and yields time- and energy-resolved spectra from one simulation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if this lead-current-to-spectrum mapping holds beyond the dimer, the same array of narrow subleads could give time-resolved photoemission-like spectra for larger correlated clusters or molecules at linear cost.
  • The paper leaves satellite-peak resolution to future work; a natural check is to narrow the sublead width and lower the temperature until the satellite weight separates from the quasiparticle peak, which would test the fidelity of the current-based spectrum.
  • Because the authors note that the two-auxiliary-lead extraction scheme cited in the paper is compatible with iGKBA, that scheme could serve as a controlled benchmark for whether the single-fan narrow-band-lead currents are distorted by detector occupation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper applies the iterative generalized Kadanoff-Baym ansatz (iGKBA), a time-linear nonequilibrium Green's function method, to a Hubbard dimer coupled to multiple narrow-band leads. The central idea is to extract energy-resolved spectral information from the current through a set of subleads with different energy centroids, in analogy to photoemission. The authors present Hartree-Fock (HF) and second-Born (2BA) results for the time-dependent and steady-state currents, and report correlation-induced broadening and shifts of spectral peaks as well as a suppression of transient current oscillations. The paper emphasizes the computational efficiency of the approach relative to full two-time Kadanoff-Baym equations.

Significance. If the central mapping between the sublead current J1(ε1) and the interacting spectral function A(ω) is valid, the work offers a computationally attractive route to spectral information for correlated open quantum systems. The paper has clear strengths: the HF currents are checked against the independent Landauer-Büttiker formula, the computational cost of each part is stated explicitly, and the authors are honest about several limitations (incomplete thermalisation, unresolved satellites, the absence of G< within GKBA). The significance is conditional, however, because the correlated 2BA interpretation of J1(ε1) as A(ω) is not derived or numerically validated against a full KBE or exact benchmark.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.3, Eq. (23)] The central identification of the narrow-band-lead current J1(ε1) with the interacting spectral function A(ω) is not established for the correlated 2BA case. The Meir-Wingreen expression for the steady-state current contains the term Γα(ω)G<(ω), and the paper itself states that G<(ω) is not known within GKBA. The rigorous Cohen et al. scheme that eliminates this term is described but explicitly not used because it cannot mimic photoemission. For the finite γ1 and finite bias used in Figs. 3 and 4, the G< contribution need not be negligible, so the reported correlation-induced shifts and broadenings could be artifacts of the nonequilibrium occupation and nonresonant transport channels rather than features of A(ω). Please provide a derivation (e.g., an expansion in the probe coupling) or a numerical validation of the mapping, for instance by comparing the extracted J1(ε1) with A(ω) obtained from the Cohen two-lead protocol or from a full KBE/exact calculation.
  2. [Section 3, Figs. 3(c) and 4(c)] The 2BA results are not benchmarked against full Kadanoff-Baym or exact calculations. The suppression of transient current oscillations and the peak shifts and broadenings are attributed to electronic correlations by comparing 2BA to HF, but HF is not an exact reference for the interacting model, and the iGKBA reconstruction itself adds an approximation. The paper acknowledges that satellite features were not resolved and defers a complete analysis to future work. To support the abstract's claim of revealing correlation-induced spectral changes, the authors should compare at least one of the U=5 or U=10 setups with full KBE (e.g., Ref. [49]) or with exact diagonalization of the open system, or apply the Cohen et al. protocol to verify that the 2BA current indeed tracks A(ω).
  3. [Section 3, Fig. 2(c) and Fig. 3(c)] The stationary-state interpretation of the energy-resolved currents is weakened by incomplete thermalisation. The paper itself explains the small deviations between LB and HF currents for V2=-2 as due to incomplete thermalisation during the first time interval, yet the spectral curves in panels (c) are taken at t=-1 in that same interval. For U=5 and U=10, the relaxation dynamics may be even slower, and the second interval may also not be fully stationary at tf. The authors should quantify stationarity (e.g., show that J1(ε1) has converged with respect to propagation time or that the current is independent of t over a plateau) before interpreting these curves as spectral functions.
  4. [Abstract and Section 3, Figs. 2(d)-4(e)] The time-energy current maps in panels (d) and (e) are presented as 'time- and energy-resolved spectral density' in the abstract and conclusion, but the spectral interpretation is only made for the stationary currents in panels (c). The transient current maps are not converted into a time-dependent spectral function, and it is not shown that the transient features reflect the system's spectral properties rather than the response of the leads and the bias-switch protocol. The text should either provide the mapping for the time-dependent case or restrict the spectral claim to the stationary regime.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, first paragraph] The text gives γ2 = 0.07 for the U=1 calculation, whereas Fig. 2(a) reports γ2 = 0.12; the later statement that γ2 is reduced to 0.07 for U=5 and 10 indicates a typo in the main text.
  2. [Section 2.2, Eq. (16)] Equation (16) defines the density matrix at half-filling via a single parameter a, but in the open-system simulations the density matrix deviates from this form; the text should state more explicitly that Eq. (16) is only the closed-system initial condition.
  3. [Section 2.2, after Eq. (24)] The ramp function sα(t) = cos(π/2 · t/ti)^2 θ(-t) + θ(t) leaves the value of ti unspecified; please give the values used in the simulations.
  4. [General] Since the numerical results rely heavily on the iGKBA method introduced in Ref. [30], a brief summary of the iGKBA reconstruction equations would improve the self-containedness of the paper.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the iGKBA transport simulation is benchmarked against independent analytic and full-KBE results, and the spectral interpretation, though incompletely justified, is not a fit or a self-referential reduction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: adopt the iGKBA method (Ref. [30], the authors' prior work) to propagate the density and compute embedding currents via the generalized Meir-Wingreen expression (Eq. 18); apply a second-Born self-energy to the Hubbard dimer; and interpret the energy-dependent narrow-lead current J1(epsilon1,j) as a probe of the interacting spectral function. None of these steps defines the claimed output in terms of its own inputs. No parameters are fitted to the target spectra: the lead widths, couplings, temperatures, and biases are fixed inputs, and the 2BA self-energy is not tuned to reproduce the reported peaks or broadenings. The Hartree-Fock results are independently cross-checked against the analytic Landauer-Buttiker formula (Eq. 19), and the 2BA oscillation damping is compared with full Kadanoff-Baym results (Ref. [49]). Self-citations to Refs. [6,20,30] supply the formalism, but they do not smuggle in the spectral conclusions; the central claim has independent physical content. The one genuine caveat is the paper's own admission in Sec. 2.3: in Eq. (23) G<(omega) is not known within GKBA, so J1(epsilon1) is not rigorously derived to equal A(omega); the rigorous Cohen two-auxiliary-lead extraction is explicitly not used because it cannot mimic photoemission. This is an unproven mapping and a correctness risk, not a circular reduction: the paper does not define A as J1, nor does it fit parameters to force agreement. Accordingly, the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a chain of approximations (GKBA, iGKBA, second Born) and on a spectral interpretation (probe current equals spectral function) that is not independently validated in the paper. Many lead parameters are chosen by hand. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (7)
  • probe-lead coupling gamma1,j = 0.05
    Chosen to keep the probe weakly invasive; affects peak heights and resolution.
  • right-lead coupling gamma2 = 0.12 (Fig. 2), 0.07 (Figs. 3, 4)
    Set by hand to balance coupling with energy resolution; changed between parameter sets.
  • sublead width Omega1,j = 0.5 (Fig. 2), 0.1 (Figs. 3, 4)
    Controls energy resolution of the spectral scan.
  • right-lead width Omega2 = 10
    Wide-band reservoir approximating a featureless lead.
  • lead inverse temperature beta = 10
    Chosen to approximate sharp Fermi functions without numerical difficulty.
  • bias-switch protocol V2(t) = -2 + 4(1+exp(-25t))^-1
    Specific fast switch from V2=-2 to V2=+2; chosen to probe transient dynamics, ad hoc.
  • sublead grid = 21 leads at epsilon1,j=-5+0.5(j-1) (Fig. 2); 28 leads at -2.7+0.2(j-1) (Figs. 3, 4)
    Energy grid covering the spectral range; chosen by hand.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption GKBA reconstruction of G< and G> (Eq. 1) with mean-field retarded propagator (Eq. 2) is accurate enough for the observables studied.
    The entire method is built on this approximation; corrections via iGKBA are cited to Ref. [30] but not derived here.
  • domain assumption iGKBA (Ref. [30]) correctly reconstructs two-time correlations beyond GKBA.
    The paper uses iGKBA without presenting its equations, relying on the authors' prior PRB paper.
  • domain assumption Second Born self-energy truncation is adequate for the Hubbard dimer out of equilibrium.
    Justified by prior studies [6, 21] and the paper's own HF/2BA comparisons; not benchmarked against exact results here.
  • domain assumption The adiabatic switching protocol produces the equilibrium correlated state.
    The paper states electron density is stationary after switching (Sec. 2.2); incomplete thermalisation is admitted for the first interval in Sec. 3.
  • ad hoc to paper The current through narrow-band leads is a direct proxy for the spectral function.
    Assumed by analogy to photoemission and the Landauer-Buttiker formula; for the interacting case this mapping is not derived (Sec. 2.3).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonequilibrium transport through the Hubbard dimer." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TG5CSMON

@misc{pith2026250602198,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonequilibrium transport through the Hubbard dimer},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TG5CSMON}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.02198}
}
abstract

We apply a computationally efficient approach to study the time- and energy-resolved spectral properties of a two-site Hubbard model using the nonequilibrium Green's function formalism. By employing the iterative generalized Kadanoff-Baym ansatz ($i$GKBA) within a time-linear framework, we avoid the computational cost of solving the full two-time Kadanoff-Baym equations. Spectral information is extracted by coupling the system to multiple narrow-band leads, establishing a direct analogy to photoemission experiments. Our results reveal correlation-induced shifts and broadenings of spectral features, along with a suppression of transient current oscillations. This approach provides a promising avenue for analyzing correlated electron dynamics in open quantum systems.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [49]

    Friesen, M.P., Verdozzi, C., Almbladh, C.-O.: Successes and Failures of Kadanoff- Baym Dynamics in Hubbard Nanoclusters. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103(17), 176404 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.176404

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.176404 2009

  2. [1]

    Hubbard, J.: Electron Correlations in Narrow Energy Bands. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 276(1365), 238–257 (1963) 11

    work page 1963

  3. [2]

    Esslinger, T.: Fermi-Hubbard Physics with Atoms in an Optical Lattice. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 1(1), 129–152 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-conmatphys-070909-104059

    work page 2010

  4. [3]

    Bertini, B., Heidrich-Meisner, F., Karrasch, C., Prosen, T., Steinigeweg, R., ˇZnidariˇ c, M.: Finite-temperature transport in one-dimensional quantum lat- tice models. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93(2), 025003 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/ RevModPhys.93.025003

    work page 2021

  5. [4]

    Science 342(6159), 713–715 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1242308

    Brantut, J.-P., Grenier, C., Meineke, J., Stadler, D., Krinner, S., Kollath, C., Esslinger, T., Georges, A.: A Thermoelectric Heat Engine with Ultracold Atoms. Science 342(6159), 713–715 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1242308

    doi:10.1126/science.1242308 2013

  6. [5]

    Karrasch, C., Kennes, D.M., Heidrich-Meisner, F.: Thermal Conductivity of the One-Dimensional Fermi-Hubbard Model. Phys. Rev. Lett.117(11), 116401 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.116401

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.116401 2016

  7. [6]

    Pavlyukh, Y.: Nonequilibrium Dynamics of the Hubbard Dimer. Phys. Status Solidi B, 2300510 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.202300510

    work page doi:10.1002/pssb.202300510 2024

  8. [7]

    Romaniello, P., Guyot, S., Reining, L.: The self-energy beyond GW: Local and nonlocal vertex corrections. J. Chem. Phys. 131(15), 154111 (2009) https://doi. org/10.1063/1.3249965

    doi:10.1063/1.3249965 2009

Show all 53 references
  1. [8]

    Carrascal, D.J., Ferrer, J., Smith, J.C., Burke, K.: The Hubbard dimer: a density functional case study of a many-body problem. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 27(39), 393001 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/27/39/393001

    2015 doi

  2. [9]

    Frontiers in Chemistry 9, 751054 (2021) https://doi

    Di Sabatino, S., Loos, P.-F., Romaniello, P.: Scrutinizing GW-Based Methods Using the Hubbard Dimer. Frontiers in Chemistry 9, 751054 (2021) https://doi. org/10.3389/fchem.2021.751054

    2021

  3. [10]

    Lipavsk´ y, P., ˇSpiˇ cka, V., Velick´ y, B.: Generalized Kadanoff-Baym ansatz for deriving quantum transport equations. Phys. Rev. B 34(10), 6933–6942 (1986) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.34.6933

    1986 doi

  4. [11]

    Schl¨ unzen, N., Joost, J.-P., Bonitz, M.: Achieving the Scaling Limit for Nonequi- librium Green Functions Simulations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124(7), 076601 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.076601

    2020 doi

  5. [12]

    Joost, J.-P., Schl¨ unzen, N., Bonitz, M.: G1-G2 scheme: Dramatic acceleration of nonequilibrium Green functions simulations within the Hartree-Fock generalized Kadanoff-Baym ansatz. Phys. Rev. B 101(24), 245101 (2020) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevB.101.245101

    2020

  6. [13]

    Pavlyukh, Y., Perfetto, E., Stefanucci, G.: Photoinduced dynamics of organic 12 molecules using nonequilibrium Green’s functions with second-Born, GW, T - matrix, and three-particle correlations. Phys. Rev. B104(3), 035124 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.035124

    2021 doi

  7. [14]

    Cundiff, S.T., Mukamel, S.: Optical multidimensional coherent spectroscopy. Phys. Today 66(7), 44–49 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.2047

    2013 doi

  8. [15]

    Cheng, Y.-C., Fleming, G.R.: Dynamics of Light Harvesting in Photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.60(1), 241–262 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev. physchem.040808.090259

    2009

  9. [16]

    Huang, D., Sampson, K., Ni, Y., Liu, Z., Liang, D., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Li, H., Martin, E., Levinsen, J., Parish, M.M., Tutuc, E., Efimkin, D.K., Li, X.: Quantum Dynamics of Attractive and Repulsive Polarons in a Doped MoSe 2 Monolayer. Phys. Rev. X 13(1), 011029 (202...

    2023

  10. [17]

    Schuurman, M.S., Blanchet, V.: Time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy: the continuing evolution of a mature technique. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24(34), 20012–20024 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CP05885A

    2022 doi

  11. [18]

    Quantum Frontiers 1(1), 15 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/s44214-022-00013-x

    Huang, C., Duan, S., Zhang, W.: High-resolution time- and angle-resolved pho- toemission studies on quantum materials. Quantum Frontiers 1(1), 15 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/s44214-022-00013-x

    2022 doi

  12. [19]

    Sch¨ uler, M., Berakdar, J., Pavlyukh, Y.: Time-dependent many-body treatment of electron-boson dynamics: Application to plasmon-accompanied photoemission. Phys. Rev. B 93(5), 054303 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.054303

    2016 doi

  13. [20]

    Pavlyukh, Y., Perfetto, E., Karlsson, D., Leeuwen, R., Stefanucci, G.: Time- linear scaling nonequilibrium Green’s function methods for real-time simulations of interacting electrons and bosons. I. Formalism. Phys. Rev. B 105(12), 125134 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB...

    2022 doi

  14. [21]

    Romaniello, P., Bechstedt, F., Reining, L.: Beyond the GW approximation: Combining correlation channels. Phys. Rev. B 85(15), 155131 (2012) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.155131

    2012 doi

  15. [22]

    Schl¨ unzen, N., Joost, J.-P., Heidrich-Meisner, F., Bonitz, M.: Nonequilibrium dynamics in the one-dimensional Fermi-Hubbard model: Comparison of the nonequilibrium Green-functions approach and the density matrix renormaliza- tion group method. Phys. Rev. B 95(16), 165139 (20...

    2017

  16. [23]

    Schl¨ unzen, N., Hermanns, S., Scharnke, M., Bonitz, M.: Ultrafast dynamics of strongly correlated fermions — nonequilibrium Green functions and selfen- ergy approximations. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 32(10), 103001 (2020) https: 13 //doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ab2d32

    2020 doi

  17. [24]

    Karlsson, D., Leeuwen, R., Pavlyukh, Y., Perfetto, E., Stefanucci, G.: Fast Green’s Function Method for Ultrafast Electron-Boson Dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127(3), 036402 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.036402

    2021 doi

  18. [25]

    Tuovinen, R., Pavlyukh, Y., Perfetto, E., Stefanucci, G.: Time-Linear Quan- tum Transport Simulations with Correlated Nonequilibrium Green’s Functions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130(24), 246301 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 130.246301

    2023 doi

  19. [26]

    Pavlyukh, Y., Perfetto, E., Stefanucci, G.: Interacting electrons and bosons in the doubly screened GfW approximation: A time-linear scaling method for first- principles simulations. Phys. Rev. B 106(20), 201408 (2022) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevB.106.L201408

    2022

  20. [27]

    Nano Lett

    Tuovinen, R., Pavlyukh, Y.: Electroluminescence Rectification and High Har- monic Generation in Molecular Junctions. Nano Lett. 24(29), 9096–9103 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c02609

    2024 doi

  21. [28]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013)

    Stefanucci, G., Leeuwen, R.: Nonequilibrium Many-Body Theory of Quantum Systems: A Modern Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013)

    2013

  22. [29]

    Hu, J., Xu, R.-X., Yan, Y.: Communication: Pad´ e spectrum decomposition of Fermi function and Bose function. J. Chem. Phys. 133, 101106 (2010) https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.3484491

    2010 doi

  23. [30]

    Pavlyukh, Y., Tuovinen, R.: Open system dynamics in linear time beyond the wide-band limit. Phys. Rev. B 111(24), 241101 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.111.L241101

    2025

  24. [31]

    Kalvov´ a, A., Velick´ y, B.,ˇSpiˇ cka, V.: Beyond the Generalized Kadanoff-Baym Ansatz. Phys. Status Solidi B 256(7), 1800594 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1002/ pssb.201800594

    2019

  25. [32]

    Europhys

    Kalvov´ a, A.,ˇSpiˇ cka, V., Velick´ y, B., Lipavsk´ y, P.: Dynamical vertex correction to the generalized Kadanoff-Baym Ansatz. Europhys. Lett. 141(1), 16002 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/acad9b

    2023 doi

  26. [33]

    Kalvov´ a, A.,ˇSpiˇ cka, V., Velick´ y, B., Lipavsk´ y, P.: Fast corrections to the gen- eralized Kadanoff-Baym ansatz. Phys. Rev. B 109(13), 134306 (2024) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.134306

    2024 doi

  27. [34]

    Kalvov´ a, A., Lipavsk´ y, P.: Short-time character of corrections to the generalized Kadanoff-Baym Ansatz. Eur. Phys. J. B 98(5), 86 (2025) https://doi.org/10. 1140/epjb/s10051-025-00938-x 14

    2025

  28. [35]

    Meir, Y., Wingreen, N.S.: Landauer formula for the current through an interacting electron region. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68(16), 2512–2515 (1992) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.68.2512

    1992

  29. [36]

    Jauho, A.-P., Wingreen, N.S., Meir, Y.: Time-dependent transport in interacting and noninteracting resonant-tunneling systems. Phys. Rev. B 50(8), 5528–5544 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.50.5528

    1994 doi

  30. [37]

    Sch¨ uler, M., Pavlyukh, Y.: Spectral properties from Matsubara Green’s function approach: Application to molecules. Phys. Rev. B 97(11), 115164 (2018) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.115164

    2018 doi

  31. [38]

    Dong, X., Zgid, D., Gull, E., Strand, H.U.R.: Legendre-spectral Dyson equation solver with super-exponential convergence. J. Chem. Phys. 152(13), 134107 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0003145

    2020 doi

  32. [39]

    Fei, J., Yeh, C.-N., Gull, E.: Nevanlinna Analytical Continuation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126(5), 056402 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.056402

    2021 doi

  33. [40]

    Tuovinen, R., Leeuwen, R., Perfetto, E., Stefanucci, G.: Time-dependent Landauer-B¨ uttiker formula for transient dynamics. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 427, 012014 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/427/1/012014

    2013 doi

  34. [41]

    Tuovinen, R., Perfetto, E., Stefanucci, G., Van Leeuwen, R.: Time-dependent Landauer-B¨ uttiker formula: Application to transient dynamics in graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. B 89(8), 085131 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.89.085131

    2014

  35. [42]

    Ridley, M., MacKinnon, A., Kantorovich, L.: Current through a multilead nano- junction in response to an arbitrary time-dependent bias. Phys. Rev. B 91(12), 125433 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.125433

    2015 doi

  36. [43]

    Ridley, M., MacKinnon, A., Kantorovich, L.: Fluctuating-bias controlled electron transport in molecular junctions. Phys. Rev. B 93(20), 205408 (2016) https:// doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.205408

    2016 doi

  37. [44]

    Ridley, M., Talarico, N.W., Karlsson, D., Lo Gullo, N., Tuovinen, R.: A many- body approach to transport in quantum systems: from the transient regime to the stationary state. J. Phys. A 55(27), 273001 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1751-8121/ac7119

    2022

  38. [45]

    Ridley, M., Bellassai, L., Moskalets, M., Kantorovich, L., Tuovinen, R.: Photon- assisted stochastic resonance in nanojunctions. Phys. Rev. B 111(9), 094309 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.111.094309

    2025 doi

  39. [46]

    Cohen, G., Gull, E., Reichman, D.R., Millis, A.J.: Green’s Functions from Real-Time Bold-Line Monte Carlo Calculations: Spectral Properties of the 15 Nonequilibrium Anderson Impurity Model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112(14), 146802 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.146802

    2014 doi

  40. [47]

    Cohen, G., Reichman, D.R., Millis, A.J., Gull, E.: Green’s functions from real- time bold-line Monte Carlo. Phys. Rev. B 89(11), 115139 (2014) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.115139

    2014 doi

  41. [48]

    Cosco, F., Tuovinen, R., Lo Gullo, N.: Interacting Electrons in a Flat-Band Sys- tem within the Generalized Kadanoff-Baym Ansatz. Phys. Status Solidi B261(9), 2300561 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.202300561

    2024 doi

  42. [51]

    Khosravi, E., Uimonen, A.-M., Stan, A., Stefanucci, G., Kurth, S., Van Leeuwen, R., Gross, E.K.U.: Correlation effects in bistability at the nanoscale: Steady state and beyond. Phys. Rev. B 85(7), 075103 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.85.075103

    2012

  43. [52]

    Puig Von Friesen, M., Verdozzi, C., Almbladh, C.-O.: Kadanoff-Baym dynamics of Hubbard clusters: Performance of many-body schemes, correlation-induced damp- ing and multiple steady and quasi-steady states. Phys. Rev. B 82(15), 155108 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.155108

    2010 doi

  44. [53]

    Strange, M., Rostgaard, C., H¨ akkinen, H., Thygesen, K.S.: Self-consistent GW calculations of electronic transport in thiol- and amine-linked molecular junc- tions. Phys. Rev. B 83(11), 115108 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB. 83.115108

    2011 doi

  45. [54]

    My¨ oh¨ anen, P., Tuovinen, R., Korhonen, T., Stefanucci, G., Leeuwen, R.: Image charge dynamics in time-dependent quantum transport. Phys. Rev. B 85(7), 075105 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.075105 16

    2012 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.