Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 72 references

The ALMA-ATOMS survey: Vibrationally excited HC$_3$N lines in hot cores

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Vibrationally excited cyanoacetylene in hot cores is lit up by mid-infrared dust radiation, not by collisions with hydrogen molecules.

desk verdict Useful HC3N* survey catalog, but the 'collisions ineffective' claim rests on an 8x underestimate of n(H2). read the letter →

arxiv 2412.12546 v2 pith:TIYE76DL submitted 2024-12-17 astro-ph.GA

Li Chen , Sheng-Li Qin , Tie Liu , Paul F. Goldsmith , Xunchuan Liu , Yaping Peng , Xindi Tang , Guido Garay
show 21 more authors
Zhiping Kou Mengyao Tang Patricio Sanhueza Ziyang Li Prasanta Gorai Swagat R. Das Leonardo Bronfman Lokesh Dewangan Pablo García Shanghuo Li Chang Won Lee Hong-Li Liu L. Viktor Tóth James O. Chibueze Jihye Hwang Xiaohu Li Fengwei Xu Jiahang Zou Wenyu Jiao Zhenying Zhang Yong Zhang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords HC3Nvibrationallyexcitedmoleculeshotcoresmid-infraredpumpingcollisionalexcitationmassivestarformationradiolineobservationsastrochemistry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that the vibrationally excited states of cyanoacetylene (HC3N) seen in hot cores, the compact warm gas around forming massive stars, are populated by absorbing mid-infrared photons from hot dust rather than by collisions with hydrogen molecules. Using 3 mm observations of 60 hot cores, the survey detects these vibrationally excited lines in 52 cores and fits excitation temperatures and column densities in 29 of them. The rotation temperatures average near 235 K, and the derived H2 number densities fall below the collisional critical density in all but one of the fitted cores, which the authors read as evidence that collisional excitation is ineffective. The conclusion matters because it turns HC3N* lines into tracers of the infrared radiation field around young massive stars rather than merely of gas density.

What carries the argument

The argument pivots on the critical density ncrit for collisional excitation of the lowest HC3N vibrational levels, taken as 4e8 $cm^{-3}$ for v7=1 at 300 K, with higher vibrational states requiring much larger densities. The survey derives H2 number densities from 3 mm dust continuum using a dust temperature adopted from complex organic molecule tracers, a gas-to-dust ratio, and a fixed dust opacity, then classifies each core by how many vibrational states are detected. Because nearly every fitted core has n(H2) below ncrit, the authors conclude that collisions cannot sustain the observed vibrational population and that mid-infrared pumping must be the dominant excitation route.

What would settle it

Observe a hot core at sub-arcsecond resolution, measure the local H2 density at the HC3N* line-forming region, and characterize the local mid-infrared field: a bright v7=1 line arising from gas shown to be denser than 4e8 $cm^{-3}$ while embedded in a weak mid-infrared environment would rule out infrared pumping as the dominant excitation mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in hot cores the vibrational population of HC3N is pumped by radiation: molecules absorb mid-infrared photons from warm dust and climb from the ground vibrational state into states such as v7=1, v7=2, v6=1, v5=1, and v4=1. The observed support is that 52 of 60 hot cores show at least one HC3N* line, that hotter cores show more vibrational states, and that the derived H2 densities are below the critical densities for collisional excitation of the low-lying vibrational modes in 28 of the 29 cores that could be fitted. The paper also reports two column-density thresholds, about 1.9e16 and 7.6e16 $cm^{-2}$, that separate cores with few vibrational states from those with many, and it finds no significant difference in rotation temperature between cores with and without ultra-compact Hii regions.

Load-bearing premise

The comparison assumes that the H2 number density averaged over a 1.2-1.9 arcsec beam (about 2000-20000 au) is representative of the gas that actually emits the HC3N* lines, so that comparing that average with the 300 K critical density is a meaningful test of whether collisions matter.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • HC3N* lines can serve as a diagnostic of the mid-infrared radiation field in hot cores rather than simply a probe of gas density.
  • Counting how many HC3N* states appear in a core offers a quick observational classification of the core's heating environment.
  • The two column-density thresholds, roughly 1.9e16 and 7.6e16 cm^-2, mark the stages at which higher-energy vibrational states begin to appear.
  • In the single core whose H2 density exceeds the v7=1 critical density, collisional excitation may become relevant, making it a natural test case for the boundary between pumping regimes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If mid-IR pumping is the dominant route, HC3N* column densities could in principle be turned into estimates of the local dust radiation field, but doing so would require radiative-transfer modeling that accounts for line optical depth and beam dilution.
  • Higher-resolution observations that resolve the line-forming region might uncover clumps denser than the beam-averaged value, which would raise the estimated collisional contribution.
  • The same pumping logic should apply to other small linear molecules with low-lying bending vibrations, so vibrationally excited lines of related cyanopolyynes may also trace infrared fields rather than density alone.
  • A clean test of the mechanism would be to compare HC3N* line intensities with the mid-infrared luminosity of the embedded protostars: a tight correlation would confirm radiative pumping, while the absence of one would point back toward collisions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a survey of vibrationally excited HC3N (J=11-10) lines in 60 hot cores using ALMA-ATOMS Band 3 data. Detections are reported in 52 cores; for 29 cores with at least three available lines, XCLASS LTE fits yield rotation temperatures between 160 and 335 K and HC3N* column densities of about 7e15 to 1.7e18 cm^-2. The authors derive H2 masses, column densities, and number densities from the 3 mm dust continuum, find correlations between the number of detected HC3N* states and the derived column density and gas temperature, and conclude that HC3N* excitation is mainly driven by mid-IR pumping from hot dust, with collisional excitation ineffective because most cores have n(H2) below the v7=1 critical density of 4e8 cm^-3.

Significance. If the central conclusion were robust, this paper would establish vibrationally excited HC3N as a tracer of the mid-IR radiation field in hot cores rather than a purely density-sensitive tracer, with consequences for interpreting HC3N* line surveys. The observational catalog—52 detections, 29 fitted cores, line frequencies, XCLASS parameters, and continuum-derived core properties—is a useful community resource, and the authors provide an independent cross-check of their rotation temperatures via rotational temperature diagrams. The main weakness is that the load-bearing comparison between n(H2) and n_crit is affected by a systematic error in the radius definition and by beam averaging, so the unqualified conclusion is currently stronger than the data support.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 3.2.1–3.2.2, Eq. (6), Tables C.1–C.4, Fig. 9] The definition of R_core in Sec. 3.2.1 as sqrt(theta_maj * theta_min) is a geometric mean of FWHM diameters, but Eq. (6) uses it directly as the radius of a uniform sphere. This underestimates the sphere volume by a factor of 8 (since (FWHM/2)^3 vs. FWHM^3) and therefore underestimates n(H2) by a factor of 8. With this correction, several entries in Tables C.1–C.4 approach or exceed the v7=1 critical density of 4e8 cm^-3: I18507+0110 is already above it (5.0e8 cm^-3), and I17016-4124c1 (2.5e8 -> 2.0e9), I19095+0930 (2.0e8 -> 1.6e9), and I15254-5621 (1.5e8 -> 1.2e9) would all cross it. The statement that 28/29 fitted cores are below n_crit is therefore not supported by the written formula. The authors should recompute n(H2) using a consistent radius (e.g., R_core/2) and propagate the effect into all density-dependent inferences and into the Abstract and Sect. 5 conclusions.
  2. [Sec. 3.3, Sec. 4.3, Fig. 3] Even with a corrected radius, Eq. (6) gives a source-averaged uniform-sphere density, whereas HC3N* emission arises from the central, densest part of the core. The paper itself notes in Sec. 3.3 that the 3 mm data are unable to resolve the emission distribution. For a plausible power-law density profile with p = 1.5–2, the density at the inner radius where v7=1 is excited is one to two orders of magnitude above the beam-averaged value, so the simple comparison of the averaged n(H2) with n_crit is not a secure test of whether collisions are effective in the emitting gas. I request a quantitative test: either use the observed continuum radial profiles to estimate central densities, or explicitly state that the conclusion applies only to beam-averaged densities and acknowledge that collisional excitation may be significant in the inner regions.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 4.3] The sentence 'All hot cores in our sample except for I18507+0110, for which n(H2) is lower than ncrit' is internally inconsistent with Table C.3, which lists n(H2) = 5.0e8 cm^-3 for I18507+0110, above 4e8 cm^-3; the text should read 'higher'. After the radius correction in the major comment, additional cores will also have n(H2) > n_crit, so the wording should be revised to reflect the actual exceptions.
  2. [Table C.1] The dust temperature for I18316-0602 is listed as 108 ± 204 K; the uncertainty is larger than the value and the lower bound is unphysical, suggesting a typographical error that should be corrected.
  3. [Abstract and Sect. 5, item (5)] The phrase 'collisional excitation is ineffective' is stated without qualification even though I18507+0110 already has n(H2) above the v7=1 critical density in the current tables; consider qualifying the conclusion to 'collisional excitation is ineffective for most cores' or to specific density regimes.
  4. [Sec. 3.1] The abbreviation HC3N* is used in the Abstract before it is formally defined in the Introduction; please define it at first use.
  5. [Fig. 7] The linear fits in the two panels are labeled only by the fitted equation; adding the correlation coefficient or reduced chi-squared would let the reader judge the claimed tightness of the relation for different excitation types.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central mid-IR pumping conclusion is anchored to an external critical-density benchmark and to independently fitted dust-continuum densities, not to a self-referential fit.

full rationale

The paper's central inference (Abstract; Sect. 5 item 5) is that HC3N* excitation is mainly driven by mid-IR pumping because the measured H2 number densities lie below the v7=1 critical density of 4e8 cm^-3 (Sect. 4.3, Fig. 9). The two inputs to this comparison are independent of each other and of the conclusion: n(H2) is obtained from 3 mm dust continuum via Eqs. (3)-(6) (Hildebrand 1983; Ossenkopf & Henning 1994), while n_crit is taken from external quantum-chemical and experimental work (Wyrowski et al. 1999; Leach et al. 2014; CDMS/JPL line data). The LTE rotation temperatures and HC3N* column densities are fitted with XCLASS using externally catalogued line parameters and are cross-checked against an independent rotational temperature diagram (Sect. 3.2.2, Appendix E). Citations to Liu et al. (2020) and Qin et al. (2022) supply the ATOMS sample, distances, and adopted dust temperatures; these are project data papers with overlapping authors, but the key comparison does not reduce to them. The correlation between the number of detected states and fitted T_rot or column density is partly a selection/fit coupling, but it is not used as the derivation of the main conclusion. The skeptically noted volume convention for R_core (using the geometric-mean FWHM as a sphere radius in Eq. 6) is a physical or calibration concern that could bias n(H2), but it is not a case of a fitted input being renamed as a prediction, so it does not constitute circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on dust-based H2 densities and critical-density comparisons rather than on new physics. No invented entities are introduced. The main fitted quantities are XCLASS rotation temperatures and column densities, plus the adopted dust temperatures and post hoc thresholds. The key assumptions are LTE, optically thin dust and free-free emission, and the critical-density criterion.

free parameters (5)
  • Rotation temperature T_rot per core = 160-335 K across 29 cores (Table B.1)
    Fitted by XCLASS under LTE to the observed HC3N* line intensities; used for temperature comparisons and Fig. 2, and for the claim that hotter cores show more excited states.
  • HC3N* column density N per core = 6.9e15 to 1.7e18 cm^-2 (Table B.1)
    Fitted by XCLASS; used to define excitation-type thresholds and abundances.
  • Dust temperature T_d per core = 100-230 K (Tables C.1-C.4)
    Adopted from Qin et al. (2022) COM temperatures with a selection rule (CH3OCHO first, then C2H5CN, then CH3OH). Directly enters H2 column, mass, number density, and abundance; its uncertainty is not propagated into the quoted errors.
  • Distinguishing HC3N* column-density thresholds = 1.9e16 and 7.6e16 cm^-2
    Chosen by eye from Fig. 8 to separate excitation types 2/3, 5/6, and 7; reported as a quantitative result without a statistical test.
  • Peak-separation threshold = 4500 au
    Hand-picked cutoff to separate 'significant' from 'small' peak offsets between HC3N* and UC H ii/continuum emission in Figs. 4-6.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption LTE holds for the vibrationally excited HC3N lines, so a single rotation temperature and column density describe all observed states.
    Invoked in Sect. 3.1 for XCLASS fitting and in Appendix E for RTD. Vibrationally excited states may deviate from LTE when IR pumping dominates, which is exactly the paper's conclusion; the consistency check with RTD does not remove this assumption because RTD also assumes LTE and optically thin emission.
  • domain assumption The 3 mm dust continuum is optically thin and can be converted to gas mass and H2 column density with a single dust opacity (0.24 cm^2 g^-1), a gas-to-dust ratio from Giannetti et al. (2017), and mean molecular weight 2.8.
    Used in Eqs. (3)-(6), Sect. 3.2.2. These choices enter n(H2), the quantity compared to critical densities for the central excitation-mechanism conclusion.
  • domain assumption Free-free emission from UC H ii regions is optically thin at 99 GHz with T_e=6000 K and N(He+)/N(H+)=0.08, so S_ff can be estimated from the H40alpha integrated intensity and subtracted.
    Sect. 3.2.1, Eq. (1). Affects the dust fluxes, hence H2 densities, for the 20 UC H ii-associated cores.
  • domain assumption If n(H2) is below n_crit for a given vibrational level, collisional excitation is ineffective, so the observed population must come from mid-IR pumping; the relevant critical densities are those for 300 K from Wyrowski et al. (1999).
    Sect. 4.3 and Fig. 9. This is the logical bridge from measured densities to the central conclusion; it neglects radiative trapping, chemical excitation, and the possibility that beam-averaged densities underestimate peak densities.
  • domain assumption The hot cores in the sample, selected via COM emission in Qin et al. (2022), are representative of hot cores and the continuum emission traces the same gas that emits HC3N*.
    Sect. 2.2 and 3.2. Sample selection and the assumption that dust continuum and HC3N* are co-spatial underpin the density and abundance comparisons.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The ALMA-ATOMS survey: Vibrationally excited HC$_3$N lines in hot cores." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TIYE76DL

@misc{pith2026241212546,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The ALMA-ATOMS survey: Vibrationally excited HC$_3$N lines in hot cores},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TIYE76DL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.12546}
}
abstract

Interstellar molecules are excellent tools for studying the physical and chemical environments of massive star-forming regions. In particular, vibrationally excited HC$_3$N (HC$_3$N*) lines are the key tracers for probing hot cores environments. We present the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) 3 mm observations of HC$_3$N* lines in 60 hot cores, aiming to investigate how physical conditions affect the excitation of HC$_3$N* transitions. We have used the XCLASS for line identification. Under the assumption of local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE), we derived the rotation temperature and column density of HC$_3$N* transitions in hot cores. Additionally, we calculated the H$_2$ column density and number density, along with the abundance of HC$_3$N* relative to H$_2$, to enable a comparison of the physical properties of hot cores with different numbers of HC$_3$N* states. We have detected HC$_3$N* lines in 52 hot cores, in which 29 cores showing more than one vibrationally excited state. Hot cores with higher gas temperatures have more detections of these vibrationally excited lines. The excitation of HC$_3$N* requires dense environments, with its spatial distribution influenced by the presence of UC Hii regions. The observed column density of HC$_3$N* contributes to the number of HC$_3$N* states in hot core environments. After analyzing the various factors influencing HC$_3$N* excitation in hot cores, we conclude that the excitation of HC$_3$N* is mainly driven by mid-IR pumping, while collisional excitation is ineffective.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.12546 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Sample spectra of HC3N* in SPW 8 for four typical hot cores. The black lines show the observed spectra at sky frequencies, and the red lines show the XCLASS modeled spectra using the best-fit parameters for vibrationally excited HC3N lines. The complete spectra in SPW 8 for other hot cores are available in Appendix D (on Zenodo). 1274 K. We used XCLASS to fit the physical parameters, in￾cluding rotation temperature,… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Histogram of rotation temperatures of vibrationally ex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Spatial distribution of 7 HC3N* lines of hot cores in IRAS 16348-4654 (top row) and IRAS 18056-1952 (bottom row). The background image of each panel from left to right is the moment-0 map of the (a) v7=1, Eu=349.77530 K, (b) v7=2, Eu=670.68918 & 673.96249 & 673.96308 K, (c) v6=1, Eu=746.53960 K, Eu=1065.29153 & 1066.4191 K, (d) v5=1 Eu=983.03920 K, (e) v7=3, Eu=990.39731 K, (f) v6=v7=1, and (g) v4=1, Eu=1274.35207 K… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Spatial distributions of HC3N v7=1 emission in 20 sources associated with UC Hii regions. The background images are moment-0 maps of v7=1 emission. The white contours represent the intensity of continuum emission, with contour levels ranging from 10% to 90% of the peak…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Spatial distribution of HC3N v7=1 in 25 sources without UC Hii regions. The background images are moment-0 maps of v7=1 emissions. The white contours represent the intensity of continuum emission, with contour levels ranging from 10% to 90% of the peak values in steps …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Histogram of the separations (angular distances) between the peak of the HC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Scatter plot of the peak flux vs. integrated flux for sources associated with UC H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Scatter plot of the distribution of the HC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Scatter plot of the distribution of H2 number density as a function of upper level energy. The different markers represent different types of hot cores with different numbers of HC3N* emission lines. The horizontal dashed red line represents the crit￾ical density of 4×…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M., et al

    Afflerbach , A., Churchwell , E., Acord , J. M., et al. 1996, , 106, 423

    work page 1996

  2. [2]

    Armentrout , W. P. 2018, PhD thesis, West Virginia University

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Belloche , A., M \"u ller , H. S. P., Menten , K. M., Schilke , P., & Comito , C. 2013, , 559, A47

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    A., Snell , R

    Bergin , E. A., Snell , R. L., & Goldsmith , P. F. 1996, , 460, 343

    work page 1996

  5. [5]

    T., et al

    Bonfand , M., Belloche , A., Garrod , R. T., et al. 2019, , 628, A27

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    2024, , 687, A163

    Bonfand , M., Csengeri , T., Bontemps , S., et al. 2024, , 687, A163

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    2022, , 134, 114501

    CASA Team , Bean , B., Bhatnagar , S., et al. 2022, , 134, 114501

    2022

  8. [8]

    S., Osamu , K., & Masaki , M

    Chung , H. S., Osamu , K., & Masaki , M. 1991, Journal of Korean Astronomical Society, 24, 217

    work page 1991

Show all 72 references
  1. [9]

    2002, , 40, 27

    Churchwell , E. 2002, , 40, 27

    2002

  2. [10]

    Condon , J. J. & Ransom , S. M. 2016, Essential Radio Astronomy

    2016

  3. [11]

    & Aalto , S

    Costagliola , F. & Aalto , S. 2010, , 515, A71

    2010

  4. [12]

    2000, , 361, 1058

    de Vicente , P., Mart \' n-Pintado , J., Neri , R., & Colom , P. 2000, , 361, 1058

    2000

  5. [13]

    P., Schlemmer , S., Schilke , P., Stutzki , J., & M \"u ller , H

    Endres , C. P., Schlemmer , S., Schilke , P., Stutzki , J., & M \"u ller , H. S. P. 2016, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 327, 95

    2016

  6. [14]

    B., Cernicharo , J., Viti , S., et al

    Esplugues , G. B., Cernicharo , J., Viti , S., et al. 2013, , 559, A51

    2013

  7. [15]

    M., Beltr \'a n , M

    Frau , P., Girart , J. M., Beltr \'a n , M. T., et al. 2010, , 723, 1665

    2010

  8. [16]

    A., & Goicoechea , J

    Gerin , M., Neufeld , D. A., & Goicoechea , J. R. 2016, , 54, 181

    2016

  9. [17]

    2017, , 606, L12

    Giannetti , A., Leurini , S., K \"o nig , C., et al. 2017, , 606, L12

    2017

  10. [18]

    F., Krotkov , R., & Snell , R

    Goldsmith , P. F., Krotkov , R., & Snell , R. L. 1985, , 299, 405

    1985

  11. [19]

    Goldsmith , P. F. & Langer , W. D. 1999, , 517, 209

    1999

  12. [20]

    F., Snell , R

    Goldsmith , P. F., Snell , R. L., Deguchi , S., Krotkov , R., & Linke , R. A. 1982, , 260, 147

    1982

  13. [21]

    2021, , 253, 2

    He , Y.-X., Henkel , C., Zhou , J.-J., et al. 2021, , 253, 2

    2021

  14. [22]

    & van Dishoeck , E

    Herbst , E. & van Dishoeck , E. F. 2009, , 47, 427

    2009

  15. [23]

    Hildebrand , R. H. 1983, , 24, 267

    1983

  16. [24]

    K., Belloche , A., & Garrod , R

    J rgensen , J. K., Belloche , A., & Garrod , R. T. 2020, , 58, 727

    2020

  17. [25]

    L., Evans , N

    Kauffmann , J., Bertoldi , F., Bourke , T. L., Evans , N. J., I., & Lee , C. W. 2008, , 487, 993

    2008

  18. [26]

    D., Lal , D

    Khan , S., Pandian , J. D., Lal , D. V., et al. 2022, , 664, A140

    2022

  19. [27]

    G., Aikin , A

    Kunde , V. G., Aikin , A. C., Hanel , R. A., et al. 1981, , 292, 686

    1981

  20. [28]

    A., Mahjoub , A., et al

    Leach , S., Garcia , G. A., Mahjoub , A., et al. 2014, , 140, 174305

    2014

  21. [29]

    & Goldsmith , P

    Li , D. & Goldsmith , P. F. 2012, , 756, 12

    2012

  22. [30]

    2017, , 466, 248

    Li , S., Wang , J., Zhang , Z.-Y., et al. 2017, , 466, 248

    2017

  23. [31]

    2021, , 505, 2801

    Liu , H.-L., Liu , T., Evans , Neal J., I., et al. 2021, , 505, 2801

    2021

  24. [32]

    J., Kim , K.-T., et al

    Liu , T., Evans , N. J., Kim , K.-T., et al. 2020, , 496, 2790

    2020

  25. [33]

    2024, , 271, 3

    Liu , X., Liu , T., Shen , Z., et al. 2024, , 271, 3

    2024

  26. [34]

    2020, , 894, L14

    Lu , X., Cheng , Y., Ginsburg , A., et al. 2020, , 894, L14

    2020

  27. [35]

    2024, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 24, 065003

    Luo , A.-X., Liu , H.-L., Li , G.-X., Pan , S., & Yang , D.-T. 2024, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 24, 065003

    2024

  28. [36]

    Mallinson , P. D. & Fayt , A. 1976, Molecular Physics, 32, 473

    1976

  29. [37]

    G., Harada , N., et al

    Mart \' n , S., Mangum , J. G., Harada , N., et al. 2021, , 656, A46

    2021

  30. [38]

    Mauersberger , R., Henkel , C., & Sage , L. J. 1990, , 236, 63

    1990

  31. [39]

    P., Waters , B., Schiebel , D., Young , W., & Golap , K

    McMullin , J. P., Waters , B., Schiebel , D., Young , W., & Golap , K. 2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 376, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI, ed. R. A. Shaw , F. Hill , & D. J. Bell , 127

    2007

  32. [40]

    2017, , 598, A7

    M \"o ller , T., Endres , C., & Schilke , P. 2017, , 598, A7

    2017

  33. [41]

    2018, , 56, 41

    Motte , F., Bontemps , S., & Louvet , F. 2018, , 56, 41

    2018

  34. [42]

    u ller , H. S. P., Schl \

    M \"u ller , H. S. P., Schl \"o der , F., Stutzki , J., & Winnewisser , G. 2005, Journal of Molecular Structure, 742, 215

    2005

  35. [43]

    M \"u ller , H. S. P., Thorwirth , S., Roth , D. A., & Winnewisser , G. 2001, , 370, L49

    2001

  36. [44]

    & Henning , T

    Ossenkopf , V. & Henning , T. 1994, , 291, 943

    1994

  37. [45]

    F., et al

    Pagani , L., Favre , C., Goldsmith , P. F., et al. 2017, , 604, A32

    2017

  38. [46]

    2017, , 837, 49

    Peng , Y., Qin , S.-L., Schilke , P., et al. 2017, , 837, 49

    2017

  39. [47]

    M., Poynter , R

    Pickett , H. M., Poynter , R. L., Cohen , E. A., et al. 1998, , 60, 883

    1998

  40. [48]

    2022, , 511, 3463

    Qin , S.-L., Liu , T., Liu , X., et al. 2022, , 511, 3463

    2022

  41. [49]

    2018, , 98, 052708

    Rankovi \'c , M., Nag , P., Zawadzki , M., et al. 2018, , 98, 052708

    2018

  42. [50]

    Rico-Villas , F., Mart \' n-Pintado , J., Gonz \'a lez-Alfonso , E., Mart \' n , S., & Rivilla , V. M. 2020, , 491, 4573

    2020

  43. [51]

    2021, , 502, 3021

    Rico-Villas , F., Mart \' n-Pintado , J., Gonz \'a lez-Alfonso , E., et al. 2021, , 502, 3021

    2021

  44. [52]

    Rosen , A. L. 2022, , 941, 202

    2022

  45. [53]

    2022, , 516, 1983

    Saha , A., Tej , A., Liu , H.-L., et al. 2022, , 516, 1983

    2022

  46. [54]

    Schilke , P., Guesten , R., Schulz , A., Serabyn , E., & Walmsley , C. M. 1992, , 261, L5

    1992

  47. [55]

    Shaver , P. A. 1970, , 5, 167

    1970

  48. [56]

    2018, , 856, 141

    Tang , M., Liu , T., Qin , S.-L., et al. 2018, , 856, 141

    2018

  49. [57]

    K., & Minamidani , T

    Taniguchi , K., Saito , M., Sridharan , T. K., & Minamidani , T. 2018, , 854, 133

    2018

  50. [58]

    A., et al

    Taniguchi , K., Sanhueza , P., Olguin , F. A., et al. 2023, , 950, 57

    2023

  51. [59]

    Taniguchi , K., Tanaka , K. E. I., Zhang , Y., et al. 2022, , 931, 99

    2022

  52. [60]

    Thorwirth , S., M \"u ller , H. S. P., & Winnewisser , G. 2000, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 204, 133

    2000

  53. [61]

    Turner , B. E. 1971, , 163, L35

    1971

  54. [62]

    van Dishoeck , E. F. 2018, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 332, Astrochemistry VII: Through the Cosmos from Galaxies to Planets, ed. M. Cunningham , T. Millar , & Y. Aikawa , 3--22

    2018

  55. [63]

    2015, , 575, A84

    Velilla Prieto , L., S \'a nchez Contreras , C., Cernicharo , J., et al. 2015, , 575, A84

    2015

  56. [64]

    F., et al

    Wang , J., Li , D., Goldsmith , P. F., et al. 2020, , 889, 129

    2020

  57. [65]

    Wyrowski , F., Schilke , P., & Walmsley , C. M. 1999, , 341, 882

    1999

  58. [66]

    Yamada , K. M. T. & Creswell , R. A. 1986, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 116, 384

    1986

  59. [67]

    2019, , 489, 4497

    Yu , N., Wang , J.-J., & Xu , J.-L. 2019, , 489, 4497

    2019

  60. [68]

    2021, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 21, 014

    Yue , Y.-H., Qin , S.-L., Liu , T., et al. 2021, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 21, 014

    2021

  61. [69]

    & Li , G.-X

    Zhang , C.-P. & Li , G.-X. 2017, , 469, 2286

    2017

  62. [70]

    I., Dewangan , L

    Zinchenko , I. I., Dewangan , L. K., Baug , T., Ojha , D. K., & Bhadari , N. K. 2021, , 506, L45

    2021

  63. [71]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sent...

  64. [72]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.